Skip to main content
Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation logoLink to Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
. 2018 Sep 26;5(6):e506. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000506

FDG-PET abnormalities leading to the diagnosis of an unusual case of probable neurosarcoidosis

Yujie Wang 1,, James Andrews 1, Paula Jenkins Colon 1, Annette Wundes 1
PMCID: PMC6192693  PMID: 30345332

Sarcoidosis is a systemic illness of unknown etiology, characterized histologically by the formation of noncaseating granulomata in the affected tissue. The most common sites of involvement include the pulmonary system; however, neurologic involvement may be seen as well, though typically presenting with systemic findings.1 Diagnosing sarcoidosis is challenging due to the lack of reliable serum or imaging markers and hence typically relies on tissue diagnosis.1 Although fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been used in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, its role is not well established.24 FDG-PET is an imaging technique wherein FDG, a glucose analogue, is introduced into the body, where it is metabolized with varied rates by different cells.24 Certain conditions, such as malignancy or inflammatory disease, demonstrate increased metabolism and therefore uptake of FDG, which is visualized by PET scan. We report a case of probable neurosarcoidosis presenting with an unusual pattern of FDG uptake without concomitant brain MRI findings.

Case report

A 48-year-old woman with generalized anxiety disorder presented with 1 month of recurrent fevers of unclear etiology, pancytopenia, and progressive neurologic symptoms including dysarthria, vertigo, diplopia, and severe gait ataxia with inability to walk. Her neurologic symptoms had a waxing and waning course, worse during febrile episodes. Her examination was notable for dysconjugate gaze with left eye exotropia, multidirectional nystagmus, and gait instability. She underwent multiple brain MRI scans with gadolinium contrast (sequences: sagittal and axial T1 precontrast, axial T1 postcontrast, sagittal and coronal T1 fat sat postcontrast, axial T2 FLAIR, sagittal and axial T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and apparent diffusion coefficient), which demonstrated mild generalized volume loss and mega cisterna magna, but no other abnormal findings (figure). MRI of her cervical spine was unremarkable. Extensive infectious workup was unrevealing (negative bacterial culture, bacterial PCR, mycobacterial PCR, fungal PCR, and viral PCR [varicella zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, enterovirus], toxoplasma immunoglobulin M/immunoglobulin G, Bartonella Ab, Borrelia species Ab, Treponema pallidum, Lyme disease, QuantiFERON Gold, and HIV). Laboratory studies showed positive antinuclear antibody, with homogenous and speckled pattern at 1:320, indeterminate antichromatin and negative anti-dsDNA, complement levels, and antiphospholipid antibody panel. A paraneoplastic panel was negative. CSF analysis showed 3 red blood cells, 11 white blood cells (92% lymphocytes), protein 45 (mg/dL), and glucose 97 (mg/dL). Serum and CSF angiotensin-converting enzyme levels were within normal limits. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was notable for mild bilateral axillary lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and a left ovarian cystic lesion. Pelvic ultrasound showed a benign-appearing left ovarian cyst, and her mammogram was negative. A bone marrow biopsy demonstrated no evidence of malignancy and was normal. Given the concern for malignancy, whole-body FDG-PET CT scan was performed (2 days after the most recent brain MRI), which showed diffusely increased FDG uptake in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres, splenomegaly, and FDG avid subpectoral and mesenteric lymph nodes not detected on previous CT (figure). She underwent excisional biopsy of a right axillary lymph node, which on histopathology demonstrated numerous well-formed, nonnecrotizing granulomata. Gomori methenamine silver and acid-fast stains were negative for fungi and acid-fast bacteria, respectively. Flow cytometry performed on peripheral blood, CSF, and the right axillary lymph node did not identify any abnormal B- or T-cell populations. She was diagnosed as probable neurosarcoidosis, with biopsy that confirmed systemic sarcoidosis in the context of a consistent clinical neurologic syndrome. A brain biopsy was considered but deferred given the risk. Her fevers and neurologic symptoms promptly improved after initiation of an empiric three-day course of IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily, followed by a slow oral prednisone taper. She was placed on mycophenolate mofetil for maintenance therapy. At 1 month after discharge, her neurologic symptoms had completely resolved, and she returned to work. At 6 months clinic follow-up, she had no residual symptoms or neurologic signs and had no recurrent episodes. At 22 months electronic and phone follow-up, she continued to report stability without residual symptoms. Repeat FDG-PET scan was considered to determine change in hypermetabolic activity after treatment, but could not be obtained because of cost barriers.

Figure. FDG-PET, lymph node biopsy, and brain MRI.

Figure

(A) FDG PET CT coronal and sagittal images, showing diffusely increased FDG uptake in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. Increased FDG uptake was also seen in the right axillary and mesenteric lymph nodes. (B) H&E stain of the right axillary lymph node biopsy with histology finding of noncaseating granuloma. Stains for microorganism were negative (Warthin-Starry, Gomori methenamine silver, acid-fast bacillus). (C–E) Brain MRI performed 2 days before FDG PET. (C) Axial T1 precontrast sequence with mild generalized volume loss and mega cisterna magna. (D) Axial T1 postcontrast sequence with no abnormal enhancement. (E) Axial T2 sequence with no signal abnormalities. FDG PET = fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; H&E = hematoxylin and eosin.

Discussion

We present a unique case of probable neurosarcoidosis with a clinical presentation and a pattern of diffuse cerebellar involvement that has not been previously reported in the literature to our knowledge.1,5,6 Extensive diagnostic workup with MRI, CSF analysis, and serologic studies was unrevealing, and the diagnosis was uncertain until FDG-PET discovered cerebellar pathology and additional lymphadenopathy, eventually allowing confirmation of systemic sarcoidosis. FDG-PET is often used in the workup of malignancy, and more recently, it has become increasingly established to identify hypermetabolic extrapulmonary sites of sarcoidosis.3,7 However, FDG-PET findings of CNS activity are not well established to diagnose neurosarcoidosis. Our case demonstrates that FDG-PET may show abnormal metabolic activity in the brain even when conventional MRI imaging is unrevealing. Such discrepancy between MRI and FDG-PET findings has been previously reported in 2 cases of spinal sarcoidosis.4,5 In addition, FDG-PET may identify lesions amenable to biopsy even when conventional imaging techniques do not. In summary, FDG-PET may have a critical role in contributing to the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis, especially when serologic studies and conventional imaging remain nondiagnostic.

Author contributions

Y. Wang: major role in the acquisition of data, analysis of the data, and drafting the manuscript for intellectual content. J. Andrews: analysis of the data and revising the manuscript for intellectual content. P. Jenkins Colon: major role in the acquisition of data and revising the manuscript for intellectual content. A. Wundes: major role in the acquisition of data, analysis of the data, and revising the manuscript for intellectual content.

Study funding

No targeted funding.

Disclosure

Y. Wang reports no disclosures; J. Andrews served on the editorial board for Arthritis Care and Research, received research support from NIH/NIA, NIH/NIAMS; P. Jenkins Colon reports no disclosures; A. Wundes received speaker honoraria from Multiple Sclerosis Association of America, received research support from Biogen, Alkermes, NMSS. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/NN.

References

  • 1.Nowak DA, Widenka DC. Neurosarcoidosis: a review of its intracranial presentation. J Neurol 2011;248:363–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dubey N, Miletich RS, Wasay M, Mechtler LL, Bakshi R. Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. J Neurol Sci 2002;205:77–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sobic-Saranovic D, Artiko V, Obradovic V. FDG PET imaging in sarcoidosis. Semin Nucl Med 2013;43:404–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang JF, Aksamit AJ, Staff NP. MRI and PET imaging discordance in neurosarcoidosis. Neurology 2012;79:1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bartels S, Kyavar L, Blumstein N, et al. FDG PET findings leading to diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:85–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fuller GN, Guiloff RJ. Clinical reports: cerebellar syndrome in sarcoidosis. Postgrad Med J 1987;63:1083–1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pekarski E, Benali K, Rouzet F. Nuclear imaging in sarcoidosis. Semin Nucl Med 2018;48:246–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology

RESOURCES