Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205070

Biosynthetic pathway and optimal conditions for the production of indole-3-acetic acid by an endophytic fungus, Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109

Tosapon Numponsak 1, Jaturong Kumla 1, Nakarin Suwannarach 1, Kenji Matsui 2, Saisamorn Lumyong 1,3,*
Editor: Sabrina Sarrocco4
PMCID: PMC6193638  PMID: 30335811

Abstract

Endophytic fungi are known to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which can stimulate plant growth. Twenty-seven isolates of endophytic fungi were isolated from Coffea arabica in northern Thailand. Only one isolate (CMU-A109) produced IAA in vitro. This isolate was identified as Colletotrichum fructicola based on morphological characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analysis of a combined five loci (internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA, actin, β-tubulin 2, chitin synthase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes). Identification of a fungal IAA production obtained from indole 3-acetamide (IAM) and tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity is suggestive of IAM routed IAA biosynthesis. The highest IAA yield (1205.58±151.89 μg/mL) was obtained after 26 days of cultivation in liquid medium supplemented with 8 mg/mL L-tryptophan at 30°C. Moreover, the crude fungal IAA could stimulate coleoptile elongation of maize, rice and rye. This is the first report of IAA production by C. fructicola and its ability to produce IAA was highest when compared with previous reports on IAA produced by fungi.

Introduction

Endophytic fungi are defined as the fungi that colonize plant tissues without causing any disease-related symptoms [13]. Colonization by endophytic fungi can improve the ecological adaptation of the host plant by enhancing its growth and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [4, 5]. Several studies have reported the potential of endophytic fungi to produce bioactive compounds that protect the host plant against microbial influences and promote plant growth in both volatile and non-volatile substance productions [68]. Many studies have shown that plant growth promotion may be attributed to the secretion of plant-growth promoting secondary metabolites (phytohormones e.g. auxins, cytokinins, ethylene and gibberellins, and siderophore) and the ability to mobilize insoluble phosphate and provide nitrogen to their host plants by endophytic fungi [913].

Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is a dominant type of auxin found in plants and is involved in the growth responses of plants for the regulation of cell elongation, cell division, cell differentiation and root initiation [14, 15]. IAA has been produced not only in plants, but also by plant-associated microorganisms including ectomycorrhizal, endophytic, pathogenic, phyllosphere and rhizospheric microbes [1620]. The main precursor for the IAA synthesis is L-tryptophan (L-Trp) and there are at least five different pathways that have been described for the IAA biosynthetic pathway in microorganisms including the indole-3-acetamide (IAM), indole-3-pyruvate (IPyA), tryptamine (TAM), indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN), and tryptophan side-chain oxidase (TSO) pathways [21, 22]. The IAM, IAN and TPyA pathways are considered the major IAA biosynthesis pathways in bacteria [23]. IAA production via TSO pathways was only reported in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 [24]. Some fungi (e.g. C. acutatum, Fusarium proliferatum, F. fujikuroi, F. oxysporum, Muscodor cinnamomi, Piriformospora indica, Ustilago esculenta and U. maydis) and yeasts (Aureobasidium pullulans, Cryptococcus flavus, Hannaella coprosmaensis, Pseudozyma aphidis, Rhodosporidium paludigenum, Rhodotorula graminis, Saccharomromyces cerevisiae and Sporisorium reilianum) mainly use IAM and IPyA pathways for IAA biosynthesis [2533]. However, there is still a need for further research on the IAA produced by endophytic fungi, as well as investigations of their IAA biosynthesis pathway. In this study, the endophytic fungi were isolated from coffee plants and their in vitro IAA production ability was investigated. The IAA synthesis pathway of the IAA producer fungi was identified. The highest IAA producer was selected and the optimal conditions for IAA production were determined. Moreover, the biological effect of crude fungal IAA was also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

No specific permits were required to carry out research in the coffee plantation. This area did not involve endangered or protected species in Thailand. Permission to coffee plant samples was granted by the Highland Research and Training Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Fungal isolation

Endophytic fungi were isolated from healthy mature leaves and stems of coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.) collected from Khun Changkean of Highland Research and Training Center, Faculty of Agricultural, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (18°50'43.0"N, 98°54'26.0"E) in November 2012. The coffee leaves and stems were washed in running tap water for 15 min and cut into small pieces (5 mm2 leaf and 1 mm length stem). The cut samples were triple surface-sterilized method (70% ethanol for 1 min, 2% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min and 95% ethanol for 30 sec) [34] under a laminar flow hood. Twenty-five leaf and stem pieces were placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 50 ppm of chloramphenicol and 35 ppm of Rose Bengal. The plates were incubated at 25°C. The fungi growing out from the tissue samples were transferred to fresh PDA plates. The pure cultures were preserved on PDA slants for the short-term and 20% glycerol at -20°C for the long-term at The Culture Collection of the Sustainable Development of Biological Resources (SDBR) Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai and Thailand Bioresource Research Center, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand.

Identification of IAA producing fungal endophyte

Morphological studies

Conventional morphological characters were used to tentatively identify the selected IAA producing endophytic fungi. Colony characteristics including aerial mycelium, density and pigment production were recorded. Micromorphological characteristics were examined using a light microscope (Olympus CX51, Japan). Size data of the anatomical features are based on at least 50 measurements of each structure.

Molecular studies

Molecular techniques were used to confirm the identification of IAA producing endophytic fungi. Genomic DNA was extracted from one week-old fungal mycelia on PDA (1–5 mg) using a DNA Extraction Mini Kit (FAVORGEN, Taiwan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA), actin (ACT), β-tubulin 2 (TUB2), chitin synthase (CHS-1) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genes were amplified with primers and annealing temperatures following the previous studies [3538] as presented in Table 1. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 20 μL reaction containing 1.0 μL DNA template, 1.0 μL of each forward and reverse primers, 10.0 μL 2X Quick Taq HS DyeMix (TOYOBO, Japan) and 7 μL deionized water, and the following thermal conditions: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 2 min, the temperatures dependent on the amplified gene (Table 1) for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min, and a final 72°C for 10 min on a peqSTAR thermal cycler (PEQLAB Ltd., UK). PCR products were checked on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide under UV light. PCR products were purified using a PCR clean up Gel Extraction NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). The purified PCR products were directly sequenced. Sanger sequencing was carried out by 1ST Base Company (Kembangan, Malaysia) using the PCR primers mentioned above. Sequences were used to query GenBank via BLAST (http://blast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/top-e.html).

Table 1. Details of primers, annealing temperature and the obtained product size of the amplification of gene targets in this study.
Region Primer name Orientation Reference Annealing temperature (°C) Obtained product size (bp)
ITS ITS5 Forward [35] 54 589
ITS4 Reverse
ACT ACT512F Forward [36] 58 285
ACT783R Reverse
TUB2 T1 Forward [37] 52 743
T22 Reverse
GAPDH GSF1 Forward [38] 60 278
GSR1 Reverse
CHS-1 CHS-79F Forward [36] 50 297
CHS-345R Reverse

For phylogenetic analysis, the sequences obtained from this study and from previous studies along with sequences from GenBank database were used. The multiple sequence alignment was carried out using MUSCLE [39]. A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree from a combined ITS, ACT, TUB2, GAPDH and CHS-1 sequences was constructed using RAxML v7.0.3 [40], applying the rapid bootstrapping algorithm for 1000 replications using the GTRGAMMA model. The ML trees were viewed with TreeView32 [41]. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were carried out using the Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMCMC) method in MrBayes version 3.2 [42].

Determination of fungal indole compound production

One fungal disc (5 mm in diameter) was inoculated into 5 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB) supplemented with 2 mg/mL L-Trp (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), pH 6.0, in 18 (internal diameter) × 180 mm test tubes and incubated in the dark on a shaker for one week at room temperature (25±2ºC). The fungal culture was collected by centrifugation at 1250 × g for 5 min. The colorimetric assay [43] was performed to determine fungal indole compound production. The fungal culture was mixed with Salkowski’s reagent (1 mL of 0.5 mol/L FeCl3 in 50 mL of 35% HClO4) in ratios of 1:2 (v/v), respectively, and incubated in the dark for 30 min. The pink to red color was considered positive for IAA production. Three replications were made.

Extraction of fungal indole metabolites

The fungal IAA supernatant was acidified to pH 4.0 by using 1 mol/L HCl and mixed twice with ethyl acetate at double the volume of the supernatant. The extracted ethyl acetate was dried using a rotary evaporator. The crude extract was dissolved in methanol and kept at -20°C.

Detection and quantification of fungal IAA and related indole compounds

Thin layer chromatography

The crude ethyl acetate extract of fungal IAA was applied to of thin layer chromatography (TLC) plate (Silica gel G F257, thickness 0.25 mm, Merck, Germany). The chromatogram was performed in the mobile phase that contained n-hexane: ethyl acetate: isopropanol: acetic acid (40:20:5:1, v/v/v/v) following the study of Chung et al. [16]. Spots with Rf values identical to standards of L-Trp, IAA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), tryptophol (TOL; Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan), IPyA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), IAM (Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan), TAM (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), indole-3-lactic acid (ILA; Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan) and IAN (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were identified under UV light (254 nm) and after sprayed with Ehmann’s [44], Ehrlich’s [44] and Salkowski’s reagents.

High performance liquid chromatography

The quantification of fungal IAA was performed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) according to the method described by Szkop and Bielawski [45] with some modifications. The Shimadzu Prominence UFLC system was used, equipped with an LC-20 AD pump, SIL20ACHT autosampler, CTO-20 AC column oven, CBM-20A system controller and SPD-20A photodiode array detector. Ten microliters of the sample were injected to the Mightysil RP-18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column heated at 40°C. The gradient elution was applied. The solvent A consisted of 2.5 : 97.5% (v/v) acetic acid : deionzed water, pH 3.8 (the final pH was adjusted by 10 mol/L KOH) and solvent B consisted of 80 : 20% (v/v) acetonitrile : deionzed water. The mobile phase start with solvent A: solvent B at 80 : 20%, changing to 50 : 50%, 0 : 100% and 80 : 20% at 25, 31 and 33 min, respectively. The total run time was 40 min and a flow rate of mobile phase was set to 0.5 mL/min. The injection volume was 10 μL. The detection wavelengths were 280 and 350 nm. Retention times of the samples were determined by comparing them with the L-Trp, IAA, TOL, IPyA, IAM, TAM, ILA and IAN standards and further by co-injections. Quantification of fungal IAA and related indole compounds were carried out with the calibration curve constructed with various indole compounds.

Determination of IAA biosynthesis pathway of selected IAA producing isolate

IAA production from intermediate indole compound cultivation

To analyze the IAA biosynthetic pathway of the selected fungus, five mycelial discs were cultivated with 5 mL of basal liquid medium (2.0 g NaNO3, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g KCl, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 10.0 g glucose and 15.0 g agar per liter of distilled water, pH 6.0) supplemented with 2 mg/mL of each indole intermediate compound (IAM, IAN, IPyA and TAM) in 18 × 180 mm test tubes at 30°C under shaking conditions at 120 rpm in the darkness for one week. Cultured filtrates were sampled every day and were then extracted. The crude extracts were examined in terms of the IAA and intermediate indole compound production by HPLC techniques, as has been described above. Three replications were made.

Tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity

The fungus was cultivated in the basal liquid medium supplemented with 2 mg/mL of L-Trp at 30°C under shaking conditions at 120 rpm in the darkness for five days. Mycelia were filtrated and washed twice with Tris-HCl buffer (50 mmol/L, pH 7.8) and resuspended in 4 mL of the same buffer. Mycelia were lysed by sonication with an Ultrasonic disruptor UD-201 (Tomy Seiko, Japan). After sonication, lysate was centrifuged (1250 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and clear supernatant was used as a source of enzyme. Determination of tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity followed the method described by Mujahid et al. [46] with some modifications. Enzyme assay was carried out in the final volume of 1 mL Tris buffer (50 mmol/L, pH 7.8) containing 0.5 mL of L-Trp and 0.5 mL of enzyme extract. Reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 25 min and then stopped by addition of 100 μL of 5 mol/L HCl. Reaction mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. The formation of IAM was analyzed by HPLC techniques as mentioned above. Three replications were made.

Optimal conditions for fungal IAA production

One fungal isolate (CMU-A109) showing the ability to produce IAA was obtained and used to identify the optimal conditions for IAA production, including L-Trp concentration, temperature and cultivation period. The effect of L-Trp concentration on IAA produced by isolate CMU-A109 was studied by inoculating fungal disc (5 mm in diameter) into 18 × 180 mm test tubes containing 5 mL PDB supplemented with different concentrations of L-Trp (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mg/mL) and shaken in the darkness at room temperature (25±2ºC) for one week. The fungal supernatants were then harvested and the estimated levels of IAA production were measured by HPLC. Three replications were made. The concentration of L-Trp that gave the highest level of IAA was selected for further experiments.

Different temperatures for fungal IAA production were examined. Cultivation was performed in the darkness at various temperatures (22ºC, room temperature (25±2ºC), 30ºC and 37°C) on a shaker at 120 rpm. The fungal supernatants were harvested and the amount of IAA was determined after one week of cultivation. This treatment was carried out in triplicate.

The effects of the cultivation period on IAA production were studied. The fungal discs were cultivated in liquid medium and incubated in the dark on a shaker with 120 rpm at 30°C for 30 days. The amount of fungal IAA was evaluated every 2 days. Three replications were made.

Biological activities of fungal IAA

Biological activity of fungal IAA produced by isolate CMU-A109 was determined with the coleoptile elongation of corn (Zea mays L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.) and rye (Secale cereal L.) [17, 20]. Crude fungal IAA was dissolved in 0.5 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH, and then diluted with sterile distilled water. Crude fungal IAA solution (containing 20 and 30 μg/mL of IAA and IAM, respectively) was used in this experiment. The positive control consisted of the stock solution of 20 μg/mL IAA, 30 μg/mL, IAM and IAA mixed with IAM (20 μg/mL IAA mixed with 30 μg/mL IAM), and sterile distilled water was used as the negative control. The seed were surface disinfested in a mixture of 0.2% Tween 80 and 2% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, followed by rinsing three times in sterile water. The surface disinfested seeds were placed on 1.5% water agar and incubated at 25ºC. After 3 days, 1.5−2.0 mm tips of the coleoptiles from seedlings non-colonized by fungi and bacteria were removed and adjusted to 10 mm lengths. Sections of coleoptiles were floated in distilled water for 2 h before being used. For each treatment, ten coleoptile segments were floated in a 9 cm Petri dish containing 20 mL of each solution and were then incubated in the dark at 25ºC. After 24 h, the length of the coleoptile segments was measured. Each treatment was conducted with five replicates.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS program version 20 for Windows. Tukey’s range test was used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) between the mean values of each treatment.

Results

Fungal isolation and identification of IAA producing isolate

Twenty-seven endophytic fungi isolates were obtained from arabica coffee. Ten isolates were obtained from stem tissues and 17 isolates were obtained from leaf tissues. Only one isolate (CMU-A109) displayed positive IAA production when tested by colorimetric assay of Salkowski’s reagent as indicated by red color formation, while the uncultivated medium displayed a negative reaction.

Colonies of isolate CMU-A109 on PDA grew to 80−85 mm at 25°C in the darkness after one week (Fig 1A). Colonies were cottony, white to pale grey and the reverse side was white to pale yellow in color. Sclerotia were absent. Mycelia were superficial and immersed. Hyphae were branched, septate, and hyaline to dark brown in color and 2−3 μm wide. Appressoria were 4.0−9.5 × 3.5−7.5 μm, mostly formed from mycelia, they were brown to dark brown in color, ovoid, clavate and slightly irregular to irregular in shape while often becoming complex with age (Fig 1B). Conidiophores were reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells were cylindrical to ampulliform, hyaline, smooth, straight to curved and wider at the base, 7−18 × 1−3 μm (Fig 1C). Conidia were 9.7−14 × 3−4.5 μm (n = 50), commonly one-celled, smooth-walled with a large guttule at the centre, hyaline, cylindrical with obtuse to slightly rounded ends that were sometimes oblong (Fig 1D). Based on morphological observations, this fungal isolate was initially identified as belonging to the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex [47, 48].

Fig 1. Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic tree of Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109.

Fig 1

A. Colony on potato dextrose agar at 25°C for one week. B. Appressoria. C. Conidiophore and conidia. D. Conidia. E. Phylogram derived from maximum likelihood analysis of a combined five-gene loci (ITS, ACT, TUB2, CHS-1 and GAPDH) from Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 and related species. Colletotrichum boninense and Colletotrichum hippeastri were used as the outgroup. The numbers above branches represent maximum likelihood bootstrap percentages (left), Bayesian posterior probabilities (right) and the species described in this study is shown in bold. Bar A = 10 mm, B and C = 5 μm, D = 1 μm, E = the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Molecular methods were used to confirm the identity of the isolate. The ITS, ACT, TUB2, CHS-1 and GAPDH sequences of isolate CMU-A109 were deposited in GenBank database under accession KT378065, MG717492, MG717493, MG717494 and MG717495, respectively. A phylogram of the combined five-gene loci (ITS, ACT, TUB2, CHS-1 and GAPDH) is presented in Fig 1E. Our phylogenetic results assigned isolate CMU-A109 to C. fructicola species. The species was clearly distinguished from other Colletotrichum species and formed a sister taxon to C. nupharicola with BS support of 82% and PP value support of 0.86. Therefore, isolate CMU-A109 was identified as C. fructicola based on molecular characteristics. A pure culture was deposited in the Culture Collection of the SDBR Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University and Thailand Bioresource Research Center, Thailand under number SDBR-CMU-A109 and TBRC9265, respectively.

Detection and quantification of IAA production by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109

A combination of TLC and chromogenic reagents can provide another means for the verification of indole derivatives. The Rf values of each indole compound, crude fungal culture and crude uncultivated medium, which were applied in UV and chemical reagents, are presented in Fig 2 and Table 2. L-Trp and TAM were not separated under the conditions used (Rf = 0.0). IPyA was easily resolved into bands corresponding to IAA and other unknown compounds that are indicative of the instability of IPyA. The TLC chromatogram of a crude extract obtained from C. fructicola CMU-A109 revealed the same Rf values with those of IAM (0.24) and IAA (0.68) standards under UV light and spraying by Salkowski’s, Ehrlich’s and Ehmann’s reagents.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Identification of indole compounds produced by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 using thin layer chromatography technique under UV light (A), and chromogenic reaction reagents; Salkowski (B), Ehrlich (C) and Ehmann (D). Lane 1 = L-Trp, Lane 2 = TAM, Lane 3 = IAM, Lane 4 = ILA, Lane 5 = IPyA, Lane 6 = IAA, Lane 7 = TOL, Lane 8 = IAN, Lane 9 = uncultivated liquid medium, Lanes 10 and 11 = crude extract of fungal culture.

Table 2. Identification of indole compounds extracted from a culture of Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 using chromogenic reagents after TLC separation.

Sample Lane Rf value UV Chromogenic reagent
Salkowski Ehrlich Ehmann
L-Trp 1 0.00 + Yellow Violet Blue green
TAM 2 0.00 + Yellow Violet Green
IAM 3 0.24 + Violet Violet pink Blue
ILA 4 0.21 + Yellow Violet Blue
IPyA 5 0.48 +
IAA 6 0.68 + Violet red Violet red Blue
TOL 7 0.58 + Yellow Violet blue Blue green
IAN 8 0.78 + Blue green Orange pink Blue
Crude uncultured medium 9 0.00 + Yellow Violet Blue green
Crude fungal culture 10 0.24 + Violet Violet pink Blue
0.68 + Violet red Violet pink Blue
Crude fungal culture 11 0.24 + Violet Violet pink Blue
0.68 + Violet red Violet pink Blue

“−” = no reaction.

The HPLC analysis was conducted to more precisely identify the fungal IAA and other indole compounds. Under the relevant conditions, the retention times of L-Trp, TAM, ILA, IAM, IAA, IPyA, TOL, and IAN were 7.7, 10.4, 12.9, 13.7, 18.4, 19.1, 20.1 and 27.2 min, respectively (Fig 3A). The ethyl acetate extract of C. fructicola CMU-A109 showed a peak that corresponded to the IAA standard, with a maximum absorption value of 279 nm (Fig 3B). The identification of fungal IAA was confirmed by a co-injection with the IAA standard. The fungal IAA levels were also quantified by HPLC. Colletotrichum fructicola isolate CMU-A109 produced IAA at the level of 662.96±56.18 μg/mL. The HPLC chromatogram presented fungal IAM in crude fungal culture with a maximum absorption value of IAM at 230 nm. Identification of fungal IAM was confirmed by co-injection with the IAM standard. No correspondence of the IAA and IAM peaks was presented in the uncultivated medium extract (Fig 3C).

Fig 3. Identification of indole compounds produced by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 using high performance liquid chromatography technique.

Fig 3

A. Indole compounds standard, B. Crude extract of fungal culture, C. Uncultivated liquid medium.

Determination of IAA biosynthesis pathway of Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109

IAA production from intermediate indole compound

The IAA production by C. fructicola CMU-A109 by IAM, TAM, IPyA and IAN was examined by HPLC techniques. Fungal IAA was presented in the crude fungal culture with IAM (S1 Fig). No correspondence of the IAA peak was presented in the crude fungal culture with TAM, IPyA and IAN. Therefore, C. fructicola CMU-A109 produced IAA from IAM.

Tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity

HPLC analysis of the enzyme reaction mixture indicated the formation of IAM and IAA at retention times of 13.9 and 18.7 min, respectively. This corresponds to the IAA and IAA standards (Fig 4), which indicates that the crude lysate of C. fructicola CMU-A109 has tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity.

Fig 4. Tryptophan 2-monooxygenase activity of Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 and high performance liquid chromatography detection.

Fig 4

A. Indole compound standards, B. Reaction mixture of L-Trp and enzyme extract, C. Enzyme extract.

Optimal conditions for fungal IAA production by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109

Fungal IAA production was estimated with different concentrations of L-Trp by C. fructicola CMU-A109. The amount of fungal IAA is shown in Fig 5A. Maximum IAA production (799.18±65.00 μg/mL) was observed in the liquid medium supplemented with 8 mg/mL L-Trp when shaken in the darkness at room temperature for 7 days.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Effects of L-Trp concentration (a), temperature (b) and cultivation period (c) on fungal IAA production by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109. The results are means of three replicates ± SD. Different letters above each bar in the same parameter indicate the significant difference (P<0.05).

The IAA production by C. fructicola CMU-A109 at different temperatures is shown in Fig 5B. The results indicated that this fungus could produce IAA at all of the tested temperatures in this study and the maximum IAA yield (862.26±28.03 μg/mL) was observed at 30ºC, followed by that at room temperature (752.75±62.30 μg/mL). The lowest IAA yield (70.39±7.23 μg/mL) was recorded at 37ºC.

The effects of the cultivation period on the IAA production of C. fructicola CMU-A109 are shown in Fig 5C. The results indicated that the IAA yield increased from 0 to 26 days. The highest IAA yield was found (1205.58±151.89 μg/mL) at 26 days after cultivation.

Biological activity of fungal IAA

Elongation of rice, corn and rye coleoptile segments induced by crude IAA extract of C. fructicola CMU-A109 is shown in Fig 6. The lengths of all coleoptiles treated with fungal IAA were not statistically different from those of the IAA, IAM and IAA mixed IAM treatments. However, the values were significantly higher than the distilled water treatment.

Fig 6. Coleoptile elongation of rice, corn and rye.

Fig 6

Data are mean of five replicates. Error bar at each point indicates ± SD. Different letters above each bar indicates the significant difference (P<0.05). IAA = 20 μg/mL IAA treatment, IAM = 30 μg/mL IAM treatment, IAA+IAM = mixed 20 μg/mL IAA and 30 μg/mL IAM, Fungal IAA = crude fungal IAA treatment (contained 20 μg/mL IAA and 30 μg/mL IAM) and distilled water = distilled water treatment.

Discussion

IAA production by plant-associated microorganisms have been broadly studied and reported [7, 12, 20, 33]. In this study, C. fructicola CMU-A109 isolated from arabica coffee produced IAA in liquid medium supplemented with L-Trp at the IAA level 662.96 μg/mL. The results are similar to those of previous studies that found that the pure culture of endophytic fungi (e.g. Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus fumigatus, Chaetomium globosum, Chrysosporium pseudomerdarium, C. acutatum, C. gloeosporioides, Fusarium spp., M. cinnamomi, Paecilomyces spp., Penicillium spp., Phoma spp. and Tulasnella sp.) could produce IAA after being cultured in liquid medium supplemented with L-Trp [7, 1013, 16, 17, 19, 49]. However, the present study provides the first report of IAA produced by C. fructicola. Indole derivatives as intermediate compounds give clues for identification of the IAA biosynthetic pathway. Reports on the IAA biosynthetic pathway of microbes are limited [22] and there is a need to more clearly understand the IAA production pathway of microorganisms. Consequently, a different biosynthesis pathway of IAA has been proposed for various microbial species [21, 22, 50] and it has been determined that a single species contained more than one pathway [22, 51]. Our study found that C. fructicola produced IAA from IAM, which was confirmed by the fungal IAA production from IAM and tryptophan 2-monooxygenease activities. Similarly, previous studies have reported synthesis of IAA via the IAM pathway in C. gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene, F. proliferatum, F. verticillioides, F. fujikuroi and F. oxysporum [25, 31, 52]. However, Chung et al. [16] and Shilts et al. [53] reported synthesis of IAA by multiple pathways in C. acutatum (IAM and IPyA pathways). IAA production through the IPyA pathway was found in Piriformospora indica, Rhodosporidium paludigenum, Rhizoctonia cerealis, R. solani, Ustilago maydis and U. esculenta [26, 27, 30, 33, 54].

L-tryptophan concentration, temperature and cultivation period affected microbial IAA production. IAA produced by C. fructicola CMU-A109 increased when L-Trp concentration was increased to 8 μg/mL, IAA levels decreased when high concentration was used. This result is similar to those of previous reports, which indicated that the L-Trp concentration significantly affects microbial IAA synthesis. For example, Chutima and Lumyong [17] reported that the IAA level of C. fructicola CMU-AU 006 and Tulasnella sp. CMU-SLP 007 increased along with increased L-Trp concentrations but decreased after the L-Trp concentration reached 6 mg/mL. Bose et al. [55] found that the optimum L-Trp concentration for IAA produced by Pleurotus ostreatus was 1 mg/mL. Kumla et al. [20] reported that the maximum IAA level of different ectomycorrhizal fungi was found at levels of 2 mg/mL (Astraeus odoratus, Pisolithus albus, and Scleroderma sinnamariense) and 4 mg/mL (Phlebopus portentosus), which were optimal L-Trp concentrations. However, the concentration values decreased after adding L-Trp to the culture medium in higher amounts than the optimal L-Trp concentration. In this study, the optimal temperature for IAA production by C. fructicola CMU-A109 was 30ºC. This is in accordance with findings of previous studies, which reported that endophytic fungi normally produced IAA at temperatures between 25 to 30ºC [7, 1113, 17, 50]. Moreover, 30ºC was the optimal temperature for IAA synthesis of a wide range of microbes such as Lentinus sajor-caju [56], Streptomyces sp. CMU-H009 [57], Pantoea agglomerans strain PVM [58] and some ectomycorrhizal fungi; A. odoratus, Ph. portentosus, Pi. albus and S. sinnamariense [20]. Our results indicated that the cultivation period affected the IAA production of C. fructicola CMU-A109. This result is supported by previous studies that have indicated that IAA production varies greatly among different microbial species, and our result also correlates with the finding that L-Trp availability in the culture medium is associated with microbial growth [20, 55, 57]. Moreover, the highest level of IAA was recorded when microbes were grown in the stationary phase [12, 20, 43]. Under the optimal conditions for in vitro IAA production, bacteria producing IAA ranged from 26.63 to 6100 μg/mL, respectively [5761]. Previous reports have shown that the in vitro IAA level produced by fungi under the optimal conditions ranged from 40.76 to 563.80 μg/mL [12, 20, 32, 33, 55, 56, 62]. Interestingly, C. fructicola CMU-A109 produced IAA 1205.58±151.89 μg/mL under optimal conditions and its ability to produce IAA was highest when compared with previous reports on IAA produced by fungi.

Crude fungal IAA of C. fructicola CMU-A109 promoted the elongation of corn, rice and rye coleoptile segments. Similarly, IAA production by endophytic fungi (C. gloeosporioides CMU-AU 006, Tulasnella sp. CMU-SLP 007, Tulasnella sp. CMU-NUT 013 and M. cinnamomi) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (A. odoratus, Pi. albus, Ph. portentosus and S. sinnamariense) stimulated oat and rice coleoptile elongation [7, 12, 20]. In addition, the lengths of wheat coleoptile segments were significantly increased by IAA production from Pleurotus ostreatus [55].

Conclusion

The endophytic fungus, C. fructicola CMU-A109 isolated from leaf tissues of coffee plant produced IAA in vitro via the IAM pathway. The highest IAA yield was obtained after 26 days of cultivation in liquid medium supplemented with 8 mg/mL L-Trp at 30°C. Crude fungal IAA stimulated coleoptile elongation as plays an important role in plant-growth promotion. Further study of this fungal isolate is required to evaluate its plant growth promoting abilities for the purposes of developing fungal inoculum. In addition, any pathogenicity needs to be tested.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Identification of IAA produced by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 using intermediate indole compounds.

A. Indole compounds standard, B. Cultivation with IAM, C. Cultivation with TAM, D. Cultivation with IPyA, E. Cultivation with IAN.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mr. Russell K. Hollis and Dr. Eric H.C. McKenzie for English proof reading.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under Research-Team Association Grant (RTA5580006) (http://www.trf.or.th); Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) in Core-to-Core Program (http://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-core_to_core); Center of Excellence on Biodiversity (BDC), The Office of The Higher Education Commission, (BDC-PG2-159010) (http://www.bdc-perdo.com); and The Center of Excellence for Renewable Energy, Chiang Mai University (http://www.cmu.ac.th).

References

  • 1.Carroll G. Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves: from latent pathogen to mutualistic symbiont. Ecology 1988;69: 2–9. 10.2307/1943154 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stone JK, Polishook JD, White JRJ (2004). Endophytic fungi In: Mueller G, Bills GF, Foster MS, editors. Biodiversity of fungi: Inventory and monitoring methods. Elsevier: Burlington; 2004. pp. 241–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009;182: 314–330. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bae H, Sicher RC, Kim MS, Kim SH, Strem MD, Melnick RL, Bailey BA. The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. J Exp Bot. 2009;60: 3279–3295. 10.1093/jxb/erp165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pineda A, Zheng SJ, van Loon JJA, Pieterse CMJ, Dicke M. Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15: 507–514. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morath SU, Hung R, Bennett JW. Fungal volatile organic compounds: A review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol Rev. 2012;26: 73–83. 10.1016/j.fbr.2012.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Matsui K, Lumyong S. Characterization and efficacy of Muscodor cinnamomi in promoting plant growth and controlling Rhizoctonia root rot in tomatoes. Biol Control. 2015;90: 25–33. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen XM, Dong HL, Hu KX, Sun ZR, Chen J, Guo SX. Diversity and antimicrobial and plant-growth-promoting activities of endophytic fungi in Dendrobium loddigesii Rolfe. J Plant Growth Regul. 2010;29: 328–337. 10.1007/s00344-010-9139-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dai CC, Yu BY, Li X. Screening of endophytic fungi that promote the growth of Euphorbia pekinensis. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7: 3505–3509. 10.5897/ajb07.738 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Waqas M, Khan AL, Kamran M, Hamayun M, Kang SM, Kim YH, Lee IJ. Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indole acetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules. 2012;17: 10754–10773. 10.3390/molecules170910754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Waqas M, Khan AL, Lee IJ. Bioactive chemical constituents produced by endophytes and effects on rice plant growth. J Plant Interact. 2014;9: 478–487. 10.1080/17429145.2013.860562 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Khan AL, Hamayun M, Kang SM, Kim YH, Jung HY, Lee JH, Lee IJ. Endophytic fungal association via gibberellins and indole acetic acid can improve plant growth under abiotic stress: an example of Paecilomyces formosus LHL10. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12: 3 10.1186/1471-2180-12-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan AR, Ullah I, Waqas M, Shahzad R, Hong SJ, Park GS, Jung BK, Lee IJ, Shin JH. Plant growth-promoting potential of endophytic fungi isolated from Solanum nigrum leaves. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31: 1461–1466. 10.1007/s11274-015-1888-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Quint M, Gray WM (2006) Auxin signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9: 448–453. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61: 49–64. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chung KR, Shilts T, Ertürk Ü, Timmer LW, Ueng PP. Indole derivatives produced by the fungus Colletotrichum acutatum causing lime anthracnose and postbloom fruit drop of citus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003; 226:23–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chutima R, Lumyong S. Production of indole-3-acetic acid by Thai native orchid-associated fungi. Symbiosis. 2012;56: 35–44. 10.1007/s13199-012-0158-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dolatabadi HK, Goltapeh EM, Moieni A, Varma A. Evaluation of different densities of auxin and endophytic fungi (Piriformospora indica and Sebacina vermifera) on Mentha piperita and Thymus vulgaris growth. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11: 1644–1650. 10.5897/AJB10.1336 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khan AL, Waqas M, Hussain J, Al-Harrasi A, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Hosni K, Kim MJ, Adnan M, Lee IJ. Endophytes Aspergillus caespitosus LK12 and Phoma sp. LK13 of Moringa peregrine produce gibberellins and improve rice plant growth. J Plant Interact. 2014;9: 731–737. 10.1080/17429145.2014.917384 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumla J, Suwannarach N, Bussaban B, Matsui K, Lumyong S. Indole-3-acetic acid production, solubilization of insoluble metal minerals and metal tolerance of some sclerodermatiod fungi collected from northern Thailand. Ann Microbiol. 2014;64: 707–720. 10.1007/s13213-013-0706-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3: a001438 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007;31: 425–448. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Duca D, Lorv J, Patten CL, Rose D, Glick BR. Indole-3-acetic acid in plant-microbe interactions. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106: 85–125. 10.1007/s10482-013-0095-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oberhansli T, Defago G, Haas D. Indole-3-acetic-acid (IAA) synthesis in the biocontrol strain CHA0 of Pseudomonas fluorescens–role of tryptophan side-chain oxidase. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137: 2273–2279. 10.1099/00221287-137-10-2273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Robinson M, Riov J, Sharon A. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis in Collectotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64: 5030–5032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chung KR, Tzeng DD. Biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid by the gall-inducing fungus Ustilago esculenta. J Biol Sci. 2004;4: 744–750. 10.3923/jbs.2004.744.750 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reineke G, Heinze B, Schirawski J, Buettner H, Kahmann R, Basse CW. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis in the smut fungus Ustilago maydis and its relevance for increased IAA levels in infected tissue and host tumour formation. Mol Plant Pathol 2008;9: 339–355. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00470.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xin G, Glawe D, Doty SL. Characterization of three endophytic, indole-3-acetic acid producing yeasts occurring in Populus trees. Mycol Res. 2009; 113:973–980. 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rao RP, Hunter A, Kashpur O, Normanly J. Aberrant synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae triggers morphogenic transition, a virulence trait of pathogenic fungi. Genet Soc Am. 2010; 185:211–220. 10.1534/genetics.109.112854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hilbert M, Voll LM, Ding Y, Hofmann J, Sharma M, Zuccaro A. Indole derivative production by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is not required for growth promotion but for biotrophic colonization of barley roots. New Phytol 2012;196: 520–534. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04275.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsavkelova E, Oeser B, Oren-young L, Israeli M, Sasson Y, Tudzynski B, Sharon A. Identification and functional characterization of indole-3-acetamide-mediated IAA biosynthesis in plant-associated Fusarium species. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49: 48–57. 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sun P, Fang W, Shin L, Wei J, Fu S, Chou J. Indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts in the phyllosphere of the carnivorous plant Drosera indica L. PLoSOne 2014;9: e114196 10.1371/journal.pone.0114196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nutaratat P, Srisuk N, Arunrattiyakorn P, Limtong S. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthetic pathways in the basidiomycetous yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198: 429–437. 10.1007/s00203-016-1202-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Suwannarach N, Bussaban B, Nuangmak W, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Lumyong S. Diversity of endophytic fungi associated with Cinnamomum bejolghota (Lauraceae) in northern Thailand. Chiang Mai J Sci. 2012; 39: 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics In: Gelfand MA, Sninsky DH, Innis JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, California: Academic Press; 1990. p 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carbone I, Kohn LM. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91: 553–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997;7: 103–116. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guerber JC, Liu B, Correll JC, Johnston PR. Characterization of diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum sensu lato by sequence analysis of two gene introns, mtDNA and intron RFLPs, and mating compatibility. Mycologia. 2003;95: 872–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006;22: 2688–2690. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Page RD. TreeView. Glasgow: Glasgow University; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Sette LD, Passarini MRZ, Delarmelina C, Salati F, Duarte MCT. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi from coffee plants. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22: 1185–1195. 10.1007/s11274-006-9160-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsavkelova EA, Cherdyntseva TA, Botina SG, Netrusov AI. Bacteria associated with orchid roots and microbial production of auxin. Microbiol Res. 2007;162: 69–76. 10.1016/j.micres.2006.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ehmann A. The van Urk-Salkowski reagent-a sensitive and specific chromogenic reagent for silica gel thin-layer chromatographic detection and identification of indolederivatives. J Chromatogr. 1997;132: 267–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Szkop M, Bielawski W. A simple method for simultaneous RP-HPLC determination of indolic compounds related to bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103: 683–691. 10.1007/s10482-012-9838-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mujahid M, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Production of indole-3-acetic acid and related indole derivatives from L-tryptophan by Rubrivivax benzoatilyticus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 89:1001–1008. 10.1007/s00253-010-2951-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Prihastuti H, Cai L, Chen H, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD. Characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with coffee berries in northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2009;39: 89–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lui F, Weir BS, Damm U, Crous PW, Wang Y, Lui B, Wang Y, Zhang M, Cai L. Unravelling Colletotrichum species associated with Camellia: employing ApMat and GS loci to resolve species in the C. gloeosporioides complex. Persoonia 2015;35: 63–86. 10.3767/003158515X687597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Syamsia, Kuswinanti T, Syam’un E, Masniawati A. The potency of endophytic fungal isolates collected from local aromatic rice as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) producer. Procedia Food Sci. 2015;3: 96–103. 10.1016/j.profoo.2015.01.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pedraza RO, Ramirez-Mata A, Xiqui ML, Baca BE. Aromatic amino acid aminotransferase activity and indole-3-acetic acid production by associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;233: 15–21. 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.01.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Patten C, Glick B. Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol. 1996;42: 207–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maor R, Haskin S, Levi-Kedmi H, Sharon A. In planta production of indole-3-actic acid by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70: 1852–1854. 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1852-1854.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shilts T, Erturk U, Patel N, Chung K. Physiological regulation of biosynthesis of phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid and other indole derivatives by the citrus fungal pathogen Colletotrichum acutatum. J Biol Sci. 2005;5: 205–210. 10.3923/jbs.2005.205.210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Furukawa T, Koga J, Adachi T, Kishi K, Syōno K. Efficient conversion of L-tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid and /or tryptophol by some species of Rhizoctonia. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996;37: 899–905. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bose A, Shah D, Keharia H. Production of indole-3-acetic-acid (IAA) by white rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus under submerged condition of Jatropha seedcake. Mycology. 2014;4: 103–111. 10.1080/21501203.2013.823891 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yurekli F, Geckil H, Topcuoglu F. The synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid by the industrially important white-rot fungus Lentinus sajor-caju under different culture conditions. Mycol Res. 2003;107: 305–309. 10.1017/S0953756203007391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S. Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces sp. isolated from some medicinal plant rhizosphere soils. EurAsia J BioSci. 2010;4: 23–32. 10.5053/ejobios.2010.4.0.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abd-Alla MH, El-Sayed ESA, Rasmey AHM. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by Streptomyces atrovirens isolated from rhizospheric soil in Egypt. J Biol Earth Sci. 2013;3: B182–B193. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Apine OA, Jadhav JP. Optimization of medium for indole-3-acetic acid production using Pantoea agglomerans strain PVM. J Appl Microbiol. 2011; 110: 1235–1244. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04976.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dasri K, Kaewharn J, Kanso S, Sangchanjiradet S. Optimization of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production by rhizobacteria isolated from epiphytic orchids. KKU Res J. 2014;19: 268–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harikrishnan H, Shanmugaiah V, Balasubramanian N. Optimization for production of indole acetic acid (IAA) by plant growth promoting Streptomyces sp. VSMGT1014 isolated from rice rhizosphere. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3: 158–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mahmoud GA, Mostafa HHA (2017) Statistical optimization as a powerful tool for indole acetic acid production by Fusarium oxysporum. Eur J Biol Res. 2017;7: 315–323. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Identification of IAA produced by Colletotrichum fructicola CMU-A109 using intermediate indole compounds.

A. Indole compounds standard, B. Cultivation with IAM, C. Cultivation with TAM, D. Cultivation with IPyA, E. Cultivation with IAN.

(TIF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES