Abstract
Background
Escherichia coli is an important opportunistic pathogen that could cause inflammation of the udder in dairy cows resulting in reduced milk production and changes in milk composition and quality, and even death of dairy cows. Therefore, mastitis is the main health issue which leads to major economic losses on dairy farms. Antibiotics are routinely used for the treatment of bovine mastitis. The ability to form biofilm increases the antibiotic resistance of E. coli. Nanoparticles (NPs), a nanosized, safe, and highly cost-effective antibacterial agent, are potential biomedical tools. Given their antibacterial activities, silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) have a broad range of applications.
Methods
In this study, we performed antibacterial activity assays, biofilm formation assays, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) experiments, and real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) experiments to investigate the antibacterial and anti-biofilm effect of quercetin, Ag NPs, and Silver-nanoparticle-decorated quercetin nanoparticles (QA NPs) in E. coli strain ECDCM1.
Results
In this study, QA NPs, a composite material combining Ag NPs and the plant-derived drug component quercetin, exhibited stronger antibacterial and anti-biofilm properties in a multi-drug resistant E. coli strain isolated from a dairy cow with mastitis, compared to Ag NPs and Qe.
Discussion
This study provides evidence that QA NPs possess high antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities. They proved to be more effective than Ag NPs and Qe against the biofilm formation of a multi-drug resistant E. coli isolated from cows with mastitis. This suggests that QA NPs might be used as a potential antimicrobial agent in the treatment of bovine mastitis caused by E. coli.
Keywords: Biofilm, Bovine mastitis, Escherichia coli, Quercetin, Silver nanoparticles
Introduction
Mastitis, an infection or inflammation of the parenchyma of the mammary gland, is considered to be one of the most frequent and troublesome diseases in dairy cows and results in significant economic losses to the dairy industry worldwide (Halasa et al., 2007; Miller et al., 1993). Escherichia coli may cause mastitis which can result in death due to severe endotoxaemia (Kempf et al., 2016).
Antimicrobials are used frequently for treatment and prevention of clinical E. coli mastitis in cows (Srinivasan et al., 2007). However, due to the extensive use of antibacterial agents in bovine mastitis, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the frequent reoccurrence of chronic bovine mastitis has become a critical issue (Chambers, 2001; Gomes & Henriques, 2016). Another major reason for antibiotic resistance and recurrence of inflammation is bacterial biofilm formation inside the udder tissue (Atulya et al., 2014; Davies, 2003; Olson et al., 2002). Biofilms are defined as communities of microorganisms growing on biotic and abiotic surfaces that tightly adhered to each other in a self-produced extracellular matrix of exopolysaccharide (EPS), proteins, and DNA (Costerton et al., 1987; Prigent-Combaret et al., 2001). In E. coli, various cell surface appendages such as flagella, type I fimbriae, and curli as well as the production of the EPS (such as cellulose, colanic acid, etc.) participate in early adhesion steps (Cookson, Cooley & Woodward, 2002; Pratt & Kolter, 1998). During the maturation of the biofilm, multiplication of bacterial cells cause an expansion of the microcolonies (Prigent-Cmbaret et al., 2000; Reisner et al., 2003; Srinivasan et al., 2007). Therefore, biofilms can become hundreds of micrometers in depth and display complex structural and functional architecture (Costerton et al., 1987; Pratt & Kolter, 1998; Prigent-Cmbaret et al., 2000; Prigent-Combaret et al., 2001). The biofilm can protect E. coli against antibiotic therapy and host defense in bovine mastitis (Dantas et al., 2008; Melchior, Vaarkamp & Fink-Gremmels, 2006; Xue, Chen & Shang, 2014). Therefore, the capacity of E. coli to form biofilms can result in persistent inflammatory infection in the bovine mammary gland, which is difficult to prevent, control, or eradicate (Labbate et al., 2004; Ren et al., 2005).
In recent years, nanoparticles, safe, cost effective bactericidal materials, which are gaining popularity, and have been used successfully as carriers of therapeutic agents, in diagnostics of chronic diseases (Gomes & Henriques, 2016; Hong et al., 2008; Martinez-Gutierrez et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2008). In addition, although silver is toxic to microorganisms, it is less dangerous to mammalian cells than other metals (Morones et al., 2005; Sondi & Salopeksondi, 2004; Sun et al., 2017; Zhao & Stevens Jr , 1998). Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs or nanosilver), a kind of nanosized silver particle, are widely used NPs and show strong biocidal effects on a broad spectrum of bacterial pathogens, including E. coli (Morones et al., 2005; Sondi & Salopeksondi, 2004). However, Choi et al. (2010) demonstrated that biofilm formation in E. coli significantly increased resistance to Ag NPs. Hence, the synergistic effect of Ag NPs and other antimicrobial agents, especially plant-derived drugs, has gotten a lot of attention (Gomes & Henriques, 2016). Previous reports show that plant-derived drugs have the advantage of not inducing resistance after prolonged exposure and are easily obtained (Domadia et al., 2007; Ohno et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2017). 3, 3′, 4′, 5, 7-Pentahydroxyflavone (quercetin, Qe), a kind of flavonoid compound, is commonly present in various foods including onions, fruits, and vegetables (Smith et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2017). Silver-nanoparticle-decorated quercetin nanoparticles (QA NPs) showed highly effective antibacterial activity against drug-resistant E. coli (Sun et al., 2017). However, whether QA NPs affect biofilm formation of E. coli has not been reported. In this study, we examined the effects of QA NPs on growth and biofilm formation of E. coli isolated from a dairy cow with mastitis, and explored the regulatory role of QA NPs in biofilm-associated gene expression.
Materials and Methods
Strains and materials
The multi-drug resistant E. coli strain ECDCM1 used in this study was isolated from a dairy cow with mastitis. Strain ECDCM1 was stored at −80 °C. Before each experiment, it was first cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates which contained 10 g/L Bacto Tryptone (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), 5 g/L yeast extract (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), 10 g/L NaCl (Sangon, Shanghai, China), and 20 g/L agar powder (Sangon, Shanghai, China) for 16 h at 37 °C in air supplied with 5% CO2. QA NPs were synthesized according to a previous study (Sun et al., 2017).
Antibacterial activity assays
Antibacterial activity assays were performed according to the following methods (Chen et al., 2015). Colonies of strain ECDCM1 were placed into 3 mL of Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and cultivated at 37 °C with shaking at 180 rpm for 16 h. The overnight cultures were inoculated into fresh MH broth and diluted to a final concentration (600 nm) of 0.03 before being dispensed into 96-well plates (Costar, Corning, Steuben, NY) containing Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs at the concentrations from 0 mg/mL to 10 mg/ mL, respectively. The bacteria with or without addition of Qe, Ag NPs, and QA NPs were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h, and then 10-fold serial dilutions of cultures were performed by successive transfer (0.1 mL) through six microfuge tubes containing 0.9 mL of MH. Next, 100 µL dilutions were dropped on MH agar plates. After cultivating for 16 h at 37 °C, viable colonies were counted and compared between the control and test groups via their colony-forming units on MH agar plates. The survival rates of the control groups without exposure to Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs were designated as 100%. Experiments were repeated three times with three parallels.
Biofilm formation assay
Biofilm formation in sterile 96-well plates or 15 mm ×150 mm glass tubes was produced as described previously and modified as follows (Chen et al., 2015; Rezaei et al., 2013). Briefly, E. coli strain ECDCM1 was grown for 16 h in LB medium and diluted to a ratio of 1:50 into fresh LB medium containing 0.5% milk solution. The different concentrations of Qe, Ag NPs, and QA NPs, respectively, were added to the LB medium with 0.5% milk solution and E. coli cells. The contents were then transferred into 96-well plates and 15 mm ×150 mm glass tubes and incubated without shaking at 37 °C for 72 h and 48 h, respectively. After incubation, the growth medium was decanted, and the wells were washed three times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS pH 7.4) and air-dried. On observation the biofilms attached to the glass tubes were photographed. In addition, the biofilms attached to 96-well plates were determined quantitatively using crystal violet assay (Chen et al., 2015; O’Toole, 2011). First, the biofilm-formation cells were fixed with 100% methanol for 5 min. After decanting the methanol, the wells were air-dried and stained for 15 min with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet (CV, Sangon, Shanghai, China). Next, excess stain was gently rinsed with distilled water and air-dried overnight. Finally, the CV remaining in the wells was dissolved in 33% glacial acetic acid (Sangon, Shanghai, China) and was subsequently read using a MicroELISA autoreader (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) at a wavelength of 492 nm in single wavelength mode. Absorbance data from three replicate wells were averaged to obtain each data point.
Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM XL20, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was used to investigate the structural modifications of biofilms after treatment with Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs. For biofilm formation, the overnight E. coli strain ECDCM1 was diluted to a ratio of 1:50 into fresh LB medium complemented with 0.5% milk solution. The cultures were added to 12-well plates (Costar; Corning, Steuben, NY, USA), when necessary, Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs were added for a final concentration of 5 µg/mL. Sterile 18 mm ×18 mm coverslips were placed in the wells and served as the attaching surface for the cells. The plates were incubated for 15 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the coverslips were taken out and washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4). The preparation of the samples for SEM was performed as follows(Sun et al., 2017) . The samples were fixed overnight with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sangon, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C and subsequently dehydrated using serial ethanol concentrations: 30, 50, 70, 80, 95 and 100%. Each ethanol treatment lasted for 20 min at 4 °C and, finally, the cover slips were freeze-dried overnight.
Total RNA isolation, cDNA generation, and real-time PCR processing
The transcript levels of the biofilm-formation related genes, which are bcsA (encoding the catalytic subunit of bacterial cellulose synthase), csgA (encoding the major subunit of curli fibers), fliC (encoding the basic subunit of E. coli flagellar filament structural protein), fimA (encoding the major subunit of E. coli type 1 fimbriae), motA (encoding a protein that enables flagellar motor rotation), and wcaF (encoding a putative acetyltransferase involved in colanic acid biosynthesis) were tested by performing real-time reverse transcription-PCR experiments. First, overnight cultures of E. coli strain ECDCM1 were diluted to a ratio of 1:50 into fresh LB medium complemented with 0.5% milk solution and 5 µg/mL of Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs were added. The contents were transferred to 12-well plates and grown to the exponential phase at 37 °C without shaking. E. coli cells were then collected by centrifugation and resuspended in Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) containing 10 g/L lysozyme. After incubation for 5 min at 37 °C, total RNA was extracted from cells using the Trizol reagent (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and residual DNA was removed using DNaseI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Next, real-time RT-PCR was performed using the PrimeScript 1st Strand cDNA synthesis kit, SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and a StepOne real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Last, differences of gene expression were calculated by ΔΔCt (where Ct = cycle threshold) method using the 16S rDNA gene as the housekeeping gene, normalized by subtracting the Ct value of 16S cDNA from target cDNA. All of the real-time RT-PCR assays were repeated at least two times with similar results. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1, and the PCR amplification efficiency was controlled between 1.93 and 2.09.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
Primer name | Oligonucleotide (5′–3′) |
---|---|
rt-16s-f | TTTGAGTTCCCGGCC |
rt-16s-r | CGGCCGCAAGGTTAA |
rt-bcsA-f | GATGGTACAAATCTTCCGTC |
rt-bcsA-r | ATCTTGGAGTTGGTCAGGCT |
rt-csgA-f | AGCGCTCTGGCAGGTGTTGT |
rt-csgA-r | GCCACGTTGGGTCAGATCGA |
rt-fliC-f | CCTGAACAACACCACTACCA |
rt-fliC-r | TGCTGGATAATCTGCGCTTT |
rt-motA-f | GGCAATAATGGCAAAGCGAT |
rt-motA-r | CAGCGAAAACATCCCCATCT |
rt-wcaF-f | TCTCGGTGCCGAAAGGGTTC |
rt-wcaF-r | ATTGACGTCATCGCCGACCC |
rt-fimA-f | TGCTGTCGGTTTTAACATTC |
rt-fimA-r | ACCAACGTTTGTTGCGCTAC |
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS (ver. 19.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) by a one-way ANOVA method; the test results were shown as mean ± SD. The paired t-test was used for statistical comparisons between groups. The level of statistical significance was set at a P-value of ≤0.05.
Results
Antibacterial effect of QA NPs on E. coli strain ECDCM1
Since QA NPs were synthesized with the raw material Qe and Ag NPs, the survival rates of E. coli strain ECDCM1 exposed to Qe and Ag NPs were firstly detected. As shown in Figs. 1A and 1B, Qe and Ag NPs did not affect the survival rates of E. coli strain ECDCM1 at concentrations of 0.5 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, and 5 µg/mL; and when the concentrations of Qe and Ag NPs reached 10 µg/mL, the survival rates of E. coli strain ECDCM1 were approximately 74% and 52%, respectively, compared with the control group without exposure to Qe or Ag NPs. However, except for the 0.5 µg/mL concentration of QA NPs, the survival rate of E. coli strain ECDCM1 decreased accordingly with the increase of the concentration of QA NPs, and when the concentration of QA NPs reached 10 µg/mL, the survival rate of cells dropped to 0%. These data indicated that QA NPs had a higher antibacterial activity against E. coli strain ECDCM1 than Qe and Ag NPs.
Inhibitory effect of QA NPs on biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1
The biofilm was formed both in glass tubes and in a 96-well plate to examine the influence of QA NPs on biofilm formation capacity of E. coli strain ECDCM1. As shown in Figs. 2A–2C, Qe, Ag NPs, and QA NPs have no apparent effect on biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1 at concentrations of 1 µg/mL and 5 µg/mL, and at concentration of 10 µg/mL, biofilm formation shows only a slight decrease; however, when the concentration reached 20 µg/mL, biofilm formation is highly inhibited. Especially, at the concentration of 20 µg/mL, QA NPs almost inhibited biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1 on glass tubes to an invisible extent. In addition, the quantity of biofilm formation on the 96-well plates was tested using a MicroELISA autoreader (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). We found that the biomass significantly decreased with the increase of QA NPs compared with that of Ag NPs, and the biomass did not decrease until the concentration of Qe reached 20 µg/mL (Figs. 2D–2F).
To further investigate the effect of QA NPs on the biofilm integrity of E. coli strain ECDCM1, we performed a SEM experiment. Results showed that biofilm of the control group were compact and integral (Fig. 3A). When 5 µg/mL concentrations of different agents were added, biofilms were damaged to varying degrees. As shown in Fig. 3B, when the cultures are exposed to Qe, the biofilms are hardly damaged, and the biofilm forms were similar to that of the control group. Meanwhile, biofilms of the Ag NPs treatment group were only in slight surface crack (Fig. 3C). However, biofilms of the QA NPs treatment group were seriously damaged (Fig. 3D), indicating that QA NPs highly damaged the biofilm integrity of E. coli strain ECDCM1. These results illustrated that QA NPs exhibited stronger inhibition against biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1 than both Qe and Ag NPs.
QA NPs decrease the transcription of biofilm-associated genes in E. coli strain ECDCM1
To further confirm the inhibitory effect of QA NPs on biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1, the transcript levels of biofilm-associated genes (bcsA, csgA, fliC, fimA, motA, and wcaF) were tested by performing real-time RT-PCR experiments. Results showed that the transcript levels of bcsA, csgA, fliC, fimA, motA, and wcaF were significantly decreased upon the addition of Qe, Ag NPs, or QA NPs; moreover, with the addition of QA NPs, the transcript levels of bcsA, csgA, fliC, fimA, motA, and wcaF decreased to lower extents than with that of Qe and Ag NPs (Fig. 4), indicating that the anti-biofilm effect of QA NPs was strongest among the three antimicrobial agents. These results confirmed that QA NPs efficiently inhibited biofilm formation of E. coli strain ECDCM1 by decreasing transcription of biofilm-associated genes bcsA, csgA, fliC, fimA, motA, and wcaF.
Discussion
Bacteria in biofilms usually induce chronic mastitis characterized by prolonged inflammation and respond poorly to conventional treatments (Dean, Bishop & Hoek, 2011; Secor et al., 2011). The antibiotic therapy is the important strategy for bovine mastitis treatment (Saini et al., 2012; Saini et al., 2013; Yuan, Peng & Gurunathan, 2017). However, due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, the emergence of bacterial resistance among bacteria has become a serious problem in cows with mastitis (Gomes & Henriques, 2016). Moreover, the biofilm formation is associated with the increase of bacterial resistance to antibiotics (Dantas et al., 2008; Davies, 2003). Hence, there is an urgent need for inhibition of the bacterial biofilm formation for controlling bovine mastitis. Plant-derived drugs are new biologically active agents with antimicrobial activity (Gomes & Henriques, 2016). For example, the plant extract ursolic acid inhibited biofilm formation of E. coli (Ren et al., 2005), and the ethanol extract of Sanguisorba officinalis strongly inhibited the biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Chen et al., 2015).
In this study, the strain we used is a clinical multidrug resistant E. coli strain which is resistant to a variety of antibiotics, and also has a strong capacity to form biofilms. This kind of strains always causes infections which are difficult to cure. Our data showed that 1 µg/mL QA NPs significantly inhibited the growth of strain ECDCM1. Furthermore, at concentration of 5 µg/mL, QA NPs can disintegrate the structure of biofilm and even kill bacteria in the biofims. These data indicated that QA NPs were comparable to a kind of highly effective antibiotic. In addition, Ag NPs, the most widely used NPs, and Qe, a plant-derived ingredient, are both readily available and not expensive. Thus, the complex QA NPs might have high application value and deveolpment potential in therapy for bovine mastitis.
Conclusions
This study found that QA NPs, a composite material combining Ag NPs and the plant-derived drug component quercetin (Kareem & Al-Hamadani, 2016), can strongly inhibit the biofilm formation of an E. coli strain isolated from a dairy cow with mastitis by decreasing transcription of biofilm-associated genes bcsA, csgA, fliC, fimA, motA, and wcaF.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Xiuhong Zhou for the technical assistance on scanning electron microscope.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31672571). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Dongdong Sun, Email: sunddwj@126.com.
Ting Xue, Email: xuet@ahau.edu.cn.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Lumin Yu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Fei Shang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.
Xiaolin Chen and Jingtian Ni analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables.
Li Yu and Ming Zhang authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.
Dongdong Sun conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.
Ting Xue conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.
References
- Atulya et al. (2014).Atulya M, Mathew AJ, Rao JV, Rao CM. Influence of milk components in establishing biofilm mediated bacterial mastitis infections in cattle: a fractional factorial approach. Research in Veterinary Science. 2014;96:25–27. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chambers (2001).Chambers HF. The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2001;7:178–182. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen et al. (2015).Chen X, Shang F, Meng Y, Li L, Cui Y, Zhang M, Qi K, Xue T. Ethanol extract of Sanguisorba officinalis L. inhibits biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an ica-dependent manner. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015;98:8486–8491. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi et al. (2010).Choi OY, Yu CP, Fernández GE, Hu ZQ. Interactions of nanosilver with Escherichia coli cells in planktonic and biofilm cultures. Water Research. 2010;44:6095–6103. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cookson, Cooley & Woodward (2002).Cookson AL, Cooley WA, Woodward MJ. The role of type 1 and curli fimbriae of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in adherence to abiotic surfaces. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2002;292:195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costerton et al. (1987).Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1987;41:435–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dantas et al. (2008).Dantas G, Sommer MOA, Oluwasegun RD, Church GM. Bacteria subsisting on antibiotics. Science. 2008;320:100–103. doi: 10.1126/science.1155157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies (2003).Davies D. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2003;2:114–122. doi: 10.1038/nrd1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean, Bishop & Hoek (2011).Dean SN, Bishop BM, Hoek MLV. Natural and synthetic cathelicidin peptides with anti-microbial and anti-biofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiology. 2011;11:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Domadia et al. (2007).Domadia P, Swarup S, Bhunia A, Sivaraman J, Dasgupta D. Inhibition of bacterial cell division protein FtsZ by cinnamaldehyde. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2007;74:831–840. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes & Henriques (2016).Gomes F, Henriques M. Control of bovine mastitis: old and recent therapeutic approaches. Current Microbiology. 2016;72:377–382. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0958-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halasa et al. (2007).Halasa T, Huijps K, Øster O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly. 2007;29:18–31. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2007.9695224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong et al. (2008).Hong B, Kai J, Ren Y, Han J, Zou Z, Chong HA, Kang KA. Highly sensitive rapid, reliable, and automatic cardiovascular disease diagnosis with nanoparticle fluorescence enhancer and mems. Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology. 2008;614:265–273. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74911-2_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kareem & Al-Hamadani (2016).Kareem AA, Al-Hamadani AH. Synergistic effects of biosynthesized nanoparticles combined with antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016;2:128–138. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kempf et al. (2016).Kempf F, Slugocki C, Blum SE, Leitner G, Germon P. Genomic comparative study of Bovine Mastitis Escherichia coli. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0147954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labbate et al. (2004).Labbate M, Shu YQ, Kai SK, Rice SA, Givskov M, Kjelleberg S. Quorum sensing-controlled biofilm development in Serratia liquefaciens MG1. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186:692–698. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.3.692-698.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez-Gutierrez et al. (2013).Martinez-Gutierrez F, Boegli L, Agostinho A, Bach H, Ruiz F, James G. Anti-biofilm activity of silver nanoparticles against different microorganisms. Biofouling. 2013;29:651–660. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2013.794225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melchior, Vaarkamp & Fink-Gremmels (2006).Melchior MB, Vaarkamp H, Fink-Gremmels J. Biofilms: a role in recurrent mastitis infections? Veterinary Journal. 2006;171:398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller et al. (1993).Miller GY, Bartlett PC, Lance SE, Anderson J, Heider LE. Costs of clinical mastitis and mastitis prevention in dairy herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1993;202:1230–1236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morones et al. (2005).Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramírez JT, Yacaman MJ. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:2346–2353. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohno et al. (2003).Ohno T, Kita M, Yamaoka Y, Imamura S, Yamamoto T, Mitsufuji S, Kodama T, Kashima K, Imanishi J. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2003;8:207–215. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2003.00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson et al. (2002).Olson ME, Ceri H, Morck DW, Buret AG, Read RR. Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2002;66:86–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Toole (2011).O’Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2011;47:e2437–e2437. doi: 10.3791/2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pratt & Kolter (1998).Pratt LA, Kolter R. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Molecular Microbiology. 1998;30:285–293. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prigent-Cmbaret et al. (2000).Prigent-Cmbaret C, Prensier G, Le TT, Vidal O, Lejeune P, Dorel C. Developmental pathway for biofilm formation in curli-producing Escherichia coli strains: role of flagella, curli and colanic acid. Environmental Microbiology. 2000;2:450–464. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prigent-Combaret et al. (2001).Prigent-Combaret C, Brombacher E, Vidal O, Ambert A, Lejeune P, Landini P, Dorel C. Complex regulatory network controls initial adhesion and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli via regulation of the csgD gene. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183:7213–7223. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7213-7223.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reisner et al. (2003).Reisner A, Haagensen JA, Schembri MA, Zechner EL, Molin S. Development and maturation of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilms. Molecular Microbiology. 2003;48:933–946. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren et al. (2005).Ren D, Zuo R, González Barrios AF, Bedzyk LA, Eldridge GR, Pasmore ME, Wood TK. Differential gene expression for investigation of Escherichia coli biofilm inhibition by plant extract ursolic acid. Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:4022–4034. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4022-4034.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rezaei et al. (2013).Rezaei M, Moniri R, Mousavi SGA, Shiade MJ. Prevalence of biofilm formation among Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus isolated from nasal carriers. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2013;6:e9601. doi: 10.5812/jjm.9601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saini et al. (2012).Saini V, Mcclure JT, Scholl DT, Devries TJ, Barkema HW. Herd-level association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus isolates on Canadian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95:1921–1929. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saini et al. (2013).Saini V, Mcclure JT, Scholl DT, Devries TJ, Barkema HW. Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013;96:4965–4976. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Secor et al. (2011).Secor PR, James GA, Fleckman P, Olerud JE, Mcinnerney K, Stewart PS. Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm and Planktonic cultures differentially impact gene expression, mapk phosphorylation, and cytokine production in human keratinocytes. BMC Microbiology. 2011;11:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith et al. (2016).Smith AJ, Oertle J, Dan W, Prato D. Quercetin: a promising flavonoid with a dynamic ability to treat various diseases, infections, and cancers. Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2016;07:83–95. doi: 10.4236/jct.2016.72010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sondi & Salopeksondi (2004).Sondi I, Salopeksondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science. 2004;275:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srinivasan et al. (2007).Srinivasan V, Gillespie BE, Lewis MJ, Nguyen LT, Headrick SI, Schukken YH, Oliver SP. Phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolated from dairy cows with mastitis. Veterinary Microbiology. 2007;124:319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun et al. (2017).Sun D, Zhang W, Mou Z, Chen Y, Guo F, Yang E, Wang W. Transcriptome analysis reveals silver nanoparticle-decorated quercetin antibacterial molecular mechanism. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9:10047–10060. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xue, Chen & Shang (2014).Xue T, Chen X, Shang F. Short communication: effects of lactose and milk on the expression of biofilm-associated genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a dairy cow with mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2014;97:6129–6134. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Peng & Gurunathan (2017).Yuan YG, Peng QL, Gurunathan S. Effects of silver nanoparticles on multiple drug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureusandPseudomonas aeruginosafrom mastitis-infected goats: an alternative approach for antimicrobial therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:569–590. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2008).Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles in medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2008;83:761–769. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao & Stevens Jr (1998).Zhao G, Stevens Jr SE. Multiple parameters for the comprehensive evaluation of the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to the silver ion. Biometals. 1998;11:27–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1009253223055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data are provided in the Supplemental Files.