Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exploits an extensive network of host proteins to maintain chronic infection. Using RNA-Seq technology, we identified 30 host genes that were differentially expressed in cell culture grown HCV (HCVcc)-infected cells. Of these candidate genes, we selected solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2) for further investigation. SLC3A2, also known as CD98hc, is a member of the solute carrier family and encodes a subunit of heterodimeric amino acid transporter. SLC3A2 and LAT1 constitute a heterodimeric transmembrane protein complex that catalyzes amino acid transport. In this study, we showed that HCV upregulated both mRNA and protein expression levels of SLC3A2 and this upregulation occurred through NS3/4A-mediated oxidative stress. HCV also elevated SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level and thus mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling was activated. We further showed that L-leucine transport level was significantly increased in Jc1-infected cells as compared with mock-infected cells. Using RNA interference technology, we demonstrated that SLC3A2 was specifically required for the entry step but not for other stages of the HCV life cycle. These data suggest that SLC3A2 plays an important role in regulating HCV entry. Collectively, HCV exploits SLC3A2 for viral propagation and upregulation of SLC3A2 may contribute to HCV-mediated pathogenesis.
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the major prevalent pathogen of chronic liver diseases, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, it is estimated that approximately 80 million people worldwide are chronically infected with HCV1. HCV is an envelope virus with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA that belongs to the genus Hepacivirus within the family Flaviviridae. The genome of HCV contains 9,600 nucleotides which encodes a single polyprotein of 3,010 amino acids, which is processed by cellular and viral proteases into three structural proteins (core, E1, and E2) and seven nonstructural (NS) proteins (p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B)2. Although numerous direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are currently available to treat HCV patients, sustained virologic responses are still low in certain HCV genotypes. Moreover, the prices of DAAs are still too high and unaffordable for more than 95% of HCV patients worldwide3. Because of intrinsic nature of RNA genome of HCV, resistant-associated mutants to DAAs occur naturally due to low genetic barriers to drug resistance. Since viruses depend highly on host cellular proteins in all steps of the viral life cycle for their own propagation, host-targeting antivirals may have advantages in high genetic barriers to resistance and a potential for pan-genotypic antiviral activity. Therefore, blocking any step of the virus life cycle results in an efficient blockade of viral production and thus could be a potential target for viral therapy.
Solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2), a gene encoding for a subunit of heterodimeric amino acid transporter, belongs to CD98 family and regulates intracellular amino acid levels. The CD98 family is composed of widely expressed cell surface disulfide-linked 125-kDa heterodimeric type II membrane glycoproteins containing an 80-kDa glycosylated heavy chain (SLC3A2) and a 45-kDa non-glycosylated light chain (LAT1)4,5. SLC3A2 consists of three domains, including the extracellular domain, the transmembrane domain, and the cytoplasmic domain4. SLC3A2 together with another subunit functions as an amino acid transporter and integrin signaling enhancer6. SLC3A2 is a glycosylated protein consisting of 529 amino acids7,8. SLC3A2 is required to protect the cells from oxidative stress through leucine transport via amino acid transporters6. Growing evidences show that SLC3A2 deletion induces strong impairment of cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, and it is overexpressed in highly proliferative cells in both physiological and pathological conditions6–10. Furthermore, changes in SLC3A2 levels potentially affect cell growth and survival through modulation of leucine-mediated mTOR activation11.
In an attempt to develop host-targeted agents (HTAs), we recently performed transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis and identified 30 host genes which were upregulated in HCV-infected cells12. In the present study, we selected SLC3A2 and showed that HCV upregulated SLC3A2 expression via oxidative stress. Furthermore, SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level was increased in the context of HCV replication, suggesting that HCV might regulate leucine transporter to promote cell proliferation via mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. We further showed that SLC3A2 was involved in the entry step of the HCV life cycle. These data suggest that HCV modulates SLC3A2 to provide a favorable milieu for viral propagation.
Results
HCV upregulates SLC3A2 expression level
Using RNA-Seq technology, we recently identified 30 host genes that were highly differentially expressed in the context of HCV infection12. Among these genes, we selected SLC3A2 to investigate the possible involvement of amino acid transporter function of SLC3A2 in HCV propagation. To validate the increase of SLC3A2 expression in HCVcc-infected cells, Huh7.5 cells infected with either mock or Jc113 were harvested at 2-day intervals. We showed that mRNA levels of SLC3A2 were noticeably increased at day 6, and its levels were doubled at day 8 in Jc1-infected cells compared with the level in mock-infected cells (Fig. 1A). Consistently, protein level of SLC3A2 was also gradually increased during the course of HCV infection (Fig. 1B). Moreover, both mRNA (Fig. 1C) and protein (Fig. 1D) levels of SLC3A2 were considerably upregulated in Huh7 cells harboring HCV subgenomic replicon as compared to those in interferon-cured and parental Huh7 cells. These data clearly indicate that HCV upregulates SLC3A2 expression.
HCV upregulates SLC3A2 expression via redox signaling
It has been previously reported that HCV regulates ROS signaling cascade, leading to oxidative stress14–18. It is also known that SLC3A2 protects cells from oxidative stress by activating amino acid transporter system6. To investigate if the reactive oxygen species (ROS) is involved in upregulation of SLC3A2 in HCV infected cells, Huh7.5 cells were treated with increasing amounts of H2O2 for 24 h and then both protein and mRNA levels of SLC3A2 were analyzed by either immunoblot analysis and qRT-PCR, respectively. Figure 2A shows that protein levels of SLC3A2 in Huh7.5 cells were gradually increased by H2O2. Consistently, mRNA levels of SLC3A2 were significantly increased by H2O2. To corroborate these results, Huh7.5 cells were either mock infected or infected with Jc1. The cells were then treated with either NAC, an antioxidant agent, or BAPTA-AM, an intracellular Ca2+ chelator. As expected, both protein and mRNA expression levels of SLC3A2 were increased by HCV infection (Fig. 2B, lane 2). However, HCV-induced SLC3A2 expression levels were gradually decreased by NAC in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4). Meanwhile, BAPTA-AM displayed no effect on protein and mRNA expression levels of SLC3A2 in HCV-infected cells (Fig. 2C). Taken together, these data suggest that oxidative stress is involved in upregulation of SLC3A2 in the context of HCV infection.
SLC3A2 expression level is upregulated by NS3/4A
Since SLC3A2 expression levels are increased in both HCV infected cells and HCV replicon cells, nonstructural proteins may be responsible for this upregulation. To explore this hypothesis, Huh7.5 cells were transfected with either vector or increasing amounts of individual HCV protein expression plasmid and then SLC3A2 protein expression was analyzed by immunoblot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A, NS3/4A markedly increased SLC3A2 protein expression level. Since SLC3A2 protein expression level was also minimally increased by E1E2, we further explored the possible involvement of E1E2 on SLC3A2 expression by infecting Huh7.5 cells with either VSVpp or HCVpp derived from either H77 or JFH1. Figure 3B shows that SLC3A2 protein expression was not upregulated by E1E2, indicating that HCV NS3/4A specifically upregulated SLC3A2 protein level. Consistently, mRNA level of SLC3A2 was also significantly increased by NS3/4A but not by other HCV proteins (Fig. 3C). It has been previously reported that NS3/4A showed an approximately 11-fold increase in ROS level in Huh7.5.1 cells18. To investigate whether SLC3A2 upregulation was modulated by NS3/4A-induced ROS, Huh7.5 cells transfected with NS3/4A plasmid were treated with NAC. As shown in Fig. 3D, protein level of SLC3A2 was markedly increased by NS3/4A. However, NS3/4A-induced SLC3A2 protein level was decreased to basal level by NAC in a dose-dependent manner (left panel). Consistently, mRNA level of SLC3A2 was significantly reduced by NAC (Fig. 3D, right panel), indicating that NS3/4 A played a crucial role in upregulation of SLC3A2.
SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level was increased in the context of HCV infection
SLC3A2 (CD98) and LAT1 (SLC7A5) constitute a heterodimeric transmembrane protein complex that catalyzes amino acid transport19. We therefore wondered whether LAT1 expression level was also upregulated by HCV infection. For this purpose, Huh7.5 cells were either mock-infected or infected with Jc1 and then both mRNA and protein levels of LAT1 were determined. Figure 4A shows that mRNA levels of LAT1 were gradually increased during Jc1 infection (upper panel). Consistently, protein levels of LAT1 were markedly increased in the context of HCV infection (Fig. 4A, lower panel). We next investigated whether SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric complex level was also modulated by HCV infection. We first examined whether SLC3A2 formed a heterodimeric complex with LAT1 in hepatic cells. For this purpose, Huh7.5 cells treated with either reducing or non-reducing buffer were subjected to native gel electrophoresis and analyzed by immunoblot analysis. As shown in Fig. 4B, the same size of heterodimeric complex was detected by either anti-SLC3A2 or anti-LAT1 antibodies in cells treated with non-reducing buffer (lane 2). However, this complex was not detectable under reducing condition (Fig. 4B, lane 1), suggesting that both SLC3A2 and LAT1 formed a heterodimeric complex via disulfide bonds. To determine how HCV modulated SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric complex level, Huh7.5 cells were either mock-infected or infected with Jc1 and then total cell lysates harvested at the indicated time points were analyzed under non-reducing condition. Figure 4C shows that protein mass corresponding to the SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric complex was detected in both mock- and Jc1-infected cells. Of note, SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level was markedly increased in the context of HCV infection.
HCV modulates SLC3A2/LAT1 complex to promote cell proliferation
It has been previously reported that HCV activates the mTORC1 signaling20, and SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric amino acid transporter regulates mTORC1 signaling through transporting leucine into the cells7,8. To investigate the involvement of SLC3A2/LAT1 on amino acid transport, Huh7.5 cells treated with the indicated siRNAs were either left untreated or treated with L-leucine and then glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity was determined. Because L-leucine stimulates GDH, L-leucine transport is measured by GDH activity. Figure 5A showed that GDH activity was significantly increased in the presence of L-leucine. Of note, L-leucine-induced GDH activity was significantly decreased in both SLC3A2-silenced cells and SLC3A2/LAT1-knockdown cells. To further investigate whether amino acid level is upregulated by HCV infection, Huh7.5 cells infected with either mock or Jc1 were treated with L-leucine and GDH activity was determined. We showed that GDH activity was increased with L-leucine treatment in mock-infected cells (Fig. 5B). Importantly, GDH activity was significantly increased in Jc1-infected cells and Jc1-induced GDH activity was further enhanced in the presence of L-leucine. These data indicate that HCV increases SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level to facilitate amino acid transport in HCV-infected cells. In addition, the mTORC1 pathway known to regulate cell proliferation is mainly mediated through eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binding protein 1 (4EBP1)21,22. We showed that phosphorylation level of 4EBP1 was markedly increased in HCV-infected cells as compared with mock-infected cells (Fig. 5C). These data indicated that 4EBP1, downstream target of mTORC1, was activated in HCV infected cells, suggesting that mTORC1 signaling was upregulated by SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric amino acid transporter. To further corroborate this result, Huh7.5 cells infected with either mock or Jc1 were treated with BCH, an inhibitor of L-Leucine transporter, and then total cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Figure 5D shows that HCV-induced 4EBP1 phosphorylation level was gradually decreased with increasing amounts of BCH. We further showed that treatment of the same concentration of BCH displayed no effect on cell viability, demonstrating that the effect of BCH was specific to L-Leucine transporter (Fig. 5E). We further evaluated the role of SLC3A2/LAT1 complex in cell proliferation. Huh7.5 cells infected with either mock or Jc1 were treated with either vehicle (NH4OH) or BCH and then cell proliferation was analyzed by WST assay. As shown in Fig. 5F, BCH significantly decreased cell growth in HCV-infected cells as compared with mock-infected cells, suggesting that leucine uptake by SLC3A2/LAT1 transporter was required for cell proliferation. To further confirm this result, Huh7.5 cells infected with either mock or Jc1 were transfected with either negative siRNA or siRNAs targeting both SLC3A2 and LAT1 (double). Figure 5G verified that cell growth in HCV-infected cells was significantly decreased in SLC3A2 and LAT1 knockdown cells as compared with mock-infected cells. Collectively, these data suggest that HCV modulates SLC3A2/ LAT1 complex through mTORC1 signaling pathway to promote cell proliferation.
SLC3A2 is required for HCV propagation
To explore the possible involvement of SLC3A2 in HCV propagation, Huh7.5 cells transfected with either negative control siRNA or SLC3A2-specific siRNA were infected with Jc1, and then both mRNA and protein levels were determined. Silencing of SLC3A2 significantly suppressed RNA expression level of HCV (Fig. 6A, upper panel). Consistently, protein expression levels of HCV were impaired in SLC3A2 knockdown cells (Fig. 6A, lower panel). To further investigate the role of SLC3A2 in HCV propagation, naïve Huh7.5 cells were infected with Jc1 in supernatant harvested from the primary infection, and then both RNA and protein levels of HCV were analyzed. As shown in Fig. 6B, viral infectivity determined by both viral RNA and protein levels in the second infection was markedly decreased by knockdown of SLC3A2. Moreover, treatment of the same concentration of siRNAs displayed no cytotoxicity in the cells, indicating that the silencing effect was specific to SLC3A2 (Fig. 6C). To rule out the off-target effect of a SLC3A2 siRNA, we generated an siRNA-resistant SLC3A2 mutant. Figure 6D showed that exogenous expression of the siRNA-resistant SLC3A2 mutant, but not of the wild-type SLC3A2, restored the HCV protein expression levels (lane 3 versus lane 4). Collectively, these data suggest that SLC3A2 is specifically required for HCV propagation.
SLC3A2 is not involved in the replication, translation, and virion production steps of the HCV life cycle
To investigate which step of the HCV life cycle was required for SLC3A2, we analyzed the SLC3A2 expression level in Huh7 cells harboring HCV subgenomic replicon by silencing of SLC3A2. As shown in Fig. 7A, knockdown of SLC3A2 displayed no effect on intracellular HCV RNA (left panel) and protein (right panel) levels in replicon cells derived from genotype 1b. We next investigated whether SLC3A2 was involved in HCV internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-mediated translation. For this purpose, Huh7.5 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated siRNAs together with pRL-HL and a β-galactosidase plasmid, and then luciferase activity was determined as we reported previously12. Figure 7B demonstrated that silencing of SLC3A2 exerted no effects on HCV IRES-mediated translation. To examine if SLC3A2 was required for a later stage of the HCV life cycle, Huh7.5 cells were first infected with Jc1 for 48 h and then further transfected with either a negative siRNA or a siRNA targeting SLC3A2 or an apolipoprotein E (ApoE) siRNA as a control. At 48 h after transfection, both RNA and protein levels were determined. Figure 7C shows that silencing of SLC3A2 displayed no effect on both RNA and protein levels of HCV (upper panel). To verify this result, naïve Huh7.5 cells were infected with HCV derived from culture supernatant harvested from the first infection. As shown in Fig. 7C (lower panels), silencing of SLC3A2 had no discernible effect on viral infectivity. All these data indicated that SLC3A2 was not involved in the replication, translation, and virion production steps of the HCV life cycle.
SLC3A2 is required in the entry step of the HCV life cycle
Since SLC3A2 was not involved in replication and production steps, one remaining possibility was that SLC3A2 might play a role in the entry step of the HCV life cycle. To explore this possibility, we performed viral entry assays using HCVpp derived from either H77 or JFH1. The vesicular stomatitis glycoprotein G (VSVpp) was used as a control. As shown in Fig. 8A, HCVpp entry was impaired in SLC3A2 knockdown cells in both genotypes. However, VSVpp entry was not altered by knockdown of SLC3A2. To further verify the involvement of SLC3A2 in the HCV entry, Huh7.5 cells transfected with either negative or SLC3A2-specific siRNA were further transfected with either Flag-tagged wild-type SLC3A2 or siRNA-resistant SLC3A2 mutant plasmid. At 24 h after transfection, cells were infected with HCVpp derived from either H77 or JFH1. As shown in Fig. 8B, HCV entry was recovered by siRNA-resistant SLC3A2 mutant, but not by wild-type SLC3A2, indicating that SLC3A2 was specifically required for HCV entry. To further confirm this result, we performed viral entry assays using HCV like particle (HCV-LP) as we described previously23. In this system, HCV-LP can undergo single cycle infection without producing virions. We produced HCV-LP as depicted in Fig. 8C (left panel). Huh7.5 cells were transfected with either negative siRNA or siRNA targeting SLC3A2 and then infected with HCV-LP for 48 h. As shown in Fig. 8C (right panel), HCV-LP luciferase activity was significantly reduced in SLC3A2 knockdown cells as compared to the negative control. To further investigate the precise involvement of SLC3A2 in HCV entry, we divided HCV infection steps into attachment/binding and entry/fusion steps. To analyze if SLC3A2 was required during attachment/binding step, Huh7.5 cells were transfected with either negative control siRNA or SLC3A2-specific siRNA for 48 h and then incubated with Jc1 inoculum for 2 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, bound virions were determined by HCV RNA levels. As shown in Fig. 8D, silencing of SLC3A2 displayed no effect on HCV binding to the host cells (left panel). To determine if SLC3A2 was required during entry/fusion step, Huh7.5 cells transfected with either negative control siRNA or SLC3A2-specific siRNA for 48 h were incubated with Jc1 inoculum for 2 h at 4 °C and washed with PBS to remove unbound virions. Temperature was then shifted to 37 °C for 4 h to allow virions to internalize the host cells. The cells were trypsinized and non-internalized virions were washed away with PBS. Virion entry was determined by analyzing intracellular HCV RNA levels. Figure 8D demonstrated that HCV RNA level was significantly decreased in SLC3A2 knockdown cells (right panel), indicating that SLC3A2 is a host factor required at a post-binding step in HCV entry. Since SLC3A2 regulated HCV entry and mTORC1 signaling in complex with LAT1, we postulated that HCV envelope protein might be associated with SLC3A2. For this purpose, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with Flag-tagged SLC3A2 and either vector or V5-tagged E2 expression plasmid. Total cell lysates harvested at 36 h after transfection were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody and bound protein was detected by an anti-E2 antibody. We showed that SLC3A2 interacted with HCV E2 protein (Fig. 8E). To verify this result, the same cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-V5 antibody and bound protein was analyzed by immunoblot assay using an anti-Flag antibody. Reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation experiment confirmed that E2 interacted with SLC3A2 (Fig. 8F). However, LAT1 did not interact with HCV E2 (Fig. 8G), further confirming that SLC3A2 specifically interacted with E2 protein. Collectively, these data suggest that HCV may coopt host SLC3A2 protein via E2 to facilitate viral entry.
Discussion
SLC3A2 (also known as CD98 heavy chain, CD98hc) and large neutral amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) form a heterodimer and interact with integrins. SLC3A2 regulates the expression and distribution of the light chains to modulate amino acid transport, and overexpression of SLC3A2 promotes tumorigenesis6. Indeed, SLC3A2 was overexpressed in many cancer cell lines, including lung, colon, and breast24, and it is also known as a novel marker for renal cancer25. Our recent proteomic analysis data show that SLC3A2 is highly expressed in HCVcc-infected cells12. In the present study, we for the first time showed that both mRNA and protein expression levels of SLC3A2 were upregulated in the context of HCV replication. We also demonstrated that ROS significantly increased SLC3A2 expression levels. It has been previously reported that HCV induces ROS production in hepatoma cells16. Using NAC, we verified that the upregulation of SLC3A2 expression in HCV-infected cells was mediated by oxidative stress. Since core, NS3/4A, and NS5A proteins are involved in ROS production14–16, why NS3/4A but not core and NS5A upregulate SLC3A2 expression needs further studies. We tempted to speculate that protease enzymatic activity of NS3/4A together with ROS may be involved in SLC3A2 upregulation by unknown mechanism.
Since NS3/4A-induced mRNA and protein levels of SLC3A2 are markedly decreased by NAC (Fig. 3D), HCV upregulates SLC3A2 expression level via NS3/4A-mediated oxidative stress.
SLC3A2 forms a complex with LAT1 for amino acid transport activity4,5,7. We demonstrated that LAT1 expression level was gradually increased during HCV infection and SLC3A2/LAT1 complex level was also elevated in Jc1-infected cells. SLC3A2/LAT1 complex plays a critical role in the uptake of extracellular leucine, which subsequently leads to mTORC1 activation24,26. By siRNA-mediated silencing of SLC3A2/LAT1, we verified that SLC3A2/LAT1 complex was involved in L-leucine transport. Importantly, L-leucine transport level was significantly increased in Jc1-infected cells as compared with mock-infected cells. All these data indicate that the increase in amino acid transport in HCV-infected cells may be due to enhanced SLC3A2/LAT1 expression level. We then investigated the phosphorylation level of 4EBP1, a downstream target protein of mTORC1, in HCV infected cells. As expected, phospho-4EBP1 level was remarkably increased by HCV infection and HCV-induced phospho-4EBP1 level was pronouncedly decreased by BCH, indicating that SLC3A2/LAT1 complex was upregulated by HCV. Furthermore, cell proliferation was significantly decreased in both BCH-treated and SLC3A2/LAT1 knockdown cells, suggesting that HCV promoted cell proliferation by increasing leucine transport via mTORC1 signaling pathway for persistent infection.
Oxidative stress is an event of enhanced formation of ROS in the cells27. ROS plays an important role in determining the progression of HCV-induced liver pathogenesis28. Oxidative stress in HCV-infected cells occurs by a combination of chronic inflammation and proteins encoded by HCV. HCV core, NS3/4A, and NS5A proteins primarily cause an increase in ROS production14–16. In addition to ROS production, the mTORC1 can be also activated by HCV infection17,18. It has been previously reported that HCV NS5A activates mTOR signaling pathway to promote persistent infection29. mTORC1 consists of mTOR, raptor, mLST8, PRAS40, and DEPTOR. mTOR, core component of mTORC1/2, is a serine/threonine kinase that is involved in the regulation of multiple cellular processes, including cell growth, proliferation, protein synthesis, and survival. mTORC1 is activated by amino acids such as leucine and hormones, including leptin, insulin, and IGF-120. However, the mechanism by which HCV hijacks mTORC1 signaling pathway has not been fully understood.
We then assessed the functional role of SLC3A2 in HCV propagation. Knockdown of SLC3A2 impaired both RNA and protein expressions of HCV, implying that SLC3A2 positively regulated HCV propagation. Using an HCVpp entry assay, we showed that HCV entry was impaired in SLC3A2 knockdown cells. By analyzing the precise involvement of SLC3A2 in HCV infection, we further showed that SLC3A2 was specifically required for post-binding step in the HCV entry. This result suggests that SLC3A2 may be a novel host cofactor involved in HCV entry. HCV entry is a complex process that requires multiple cell surface factors, including CD81, scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), claudin 1 (CLDN1), occludin (OCLN), and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 cholesterol absorption receptor (NPC1L1)30–34. Furthermore, HCV internalizes the host cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis35. We also demonstrated that SLC3A2 interacted with HCV E2 protein. It has been previously reported that HCV E2 interacts with SR-BI at post-binding step to enhance viral infectivity33. Moreover, CD81 interacts with HCV E2 via a series of discontinuous amino acid residues in the large extracellular loop36 and CD81 acts as a post-binding entry molecule37. Likewise, SLC3A2 may interact with E2 to facilitate HCV entry into the host cells. Interestingly, SLC3A2 has been also implicated in vaccinia virus entry38. Although SLC3A2 is identified as an additional cofactor involved in HCV entry, how SLC3A2 functions in conjunction with those already known cofactors in HCV entry needs further studies. In summary, HCV upregulated SLC3A2 expression levels via NS3/4A-mediated oxidative stress. Furthermore, HCV increased the SLC3A2/LAT1 heterodimeric amino acid transporter level to promote viral propagation. Our study provides some compelling evidence showing that SLC3A2 is an essential cellular cofactor required for HCV entry and thus SLC3A2 could be a potential therapeutic target to interrupt HCV propagation.
Methods
Plasmid constructions and DNA transfection
Total cellular RNAs were isolated from Huh7 cells by using RiboEx (GeneAll), and full-length SLC3A2 was amplified by a primer set (sense, 5′-AAG CGG CCG CTA TGG AGC TAC AGC CT-3′; antisense, 5′-AAG GTA CCT CAG GCC GCG TAG GGG AA-3′) from cDNA synthesized by using a cDNA synthesis kit (Toyobo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were inserted into the BamH1 and Xba1 sites of plasmid pEF-V5-His (Invitrogen) to generate V5-tagged SLC3A2, and the Not1 and Kpn1 sites of the p3xFlag-CMV10 vector (Sigma-Aldrich) to generate Flag-tagged SLC3A2 expression plasmid. Myc-tagged HCV core, NS3, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B, V5-tagged HCV E2, E1E2, NS3/4A plasmids were described previously12,39. All DNA transfections were performed by using polyethyleneimine (Sigma-Aldrich) as we described previously12.
Cell culture
All cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 1% non-essential amino acids in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Huh7 cells harboring HCV subgenomic replicon derived from genotype 1b were grown as described elsewhere12.
Antibodies and chemicals
Antibodies were purchased from the following sources: SLC3A2 (catalogue #2671), mTOR (#2983), phospho-mTOR (#5536), 4EBP1 (#9644), and phospho-4EBP1 (#2855) antibodies were from Cell Signaling, Flag (#SLBQ 7119V) and β-actin (#103M4784V) antibodies were from Sigma-Aldrich, LAT1 (sc-53550) and Myc (#D0618) antibodies were from Santa Cruz, V5 (#1865511) antibody was from Invitrogen. HCV core, NS3, NS5A, and NS5B antibodies have been described elsewhere23. HCV E2 antibody was a gift from Dr. Jean Dubuisson (Institut Pasteur de Lille). N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) (#616-91-1), an antioxidant agent, and 2-aminobicyclo [2.2.1] heptane-2-carboxylic acid (BCH) (#20448-79-7), L-leucine transporter inhibitor, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. BAPTA-AM (BML-CA411-0025), an intracellular Ca2+ chelator, was purchased from Enzo.
Immunoblot analysis
Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in either radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (20 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 10 mM NaF, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail) for reducing samples or native lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA and protease inhibitors) for non-reducing samples for 15 min on ice and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay kit (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of proteins were subjected to either SDS-PAGE or non-denaturing native PAGE, and electro-transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-Tween (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, and 0.25% Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h, and then incubated with the indicated primary and secondary antibodies, respectively. Proteins were detected using an ECL kit (Abfrontier).
RNA interference
siRNAs targeting SLC3A2 (SLC3A2 siRNA #1, 5′-CUC AAC UUC UCC GAC UCU A-3′ and SLC3A2 siRNA #2, 5′-CAG AUC CUG AGC CUA CUC GAA-3′), LAT1 (5′-CUC UUU GCC UAU GGA GGA U-3′) and the universal negative control siRNA were purchased from Bioneer (South Korea). An siRNA targeting the 5′ nontranslated region (NTR) of the HCV Jc1 virus (5′-CCU CAA AGA AAA ACC AAA CUU-3′) was used as a positive control12. Jc1 is the most efficient GT2a/2a chimera construct consisting of J6CF- and JFH1-derived sequences that yields infectious titers 100- to 1,000-fold higher than the parental isolate and all other chimeras13. siRNA transfection was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMax reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
WST assay
Cells seeded on 48-well plates were either transfected with the indicated siRNAs or treated with 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptanecarboxylic acid (BCH), a SLC3A2/LAT1 transporter inhibitor, for 96 h. Cell viability was measured by incubating cells with water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST) (Dail Lab) for 1 h at 37 °C. The plate was shaken for 1 min and then aqueous layer in each well was transferred into 96-well plate. The absorbance was measured at 450/650 nm as reported previously12.
Luciferase reporter assay
Huh7.5 cells were cotransfected with a pRL-HL plasmid containing the Renilla luciferase gene under the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter and the firefly luciferase gene under the control of the HCV IRES and the plasmid indicated in the figures together with the pCH110 reference plasmid. After 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested and then dual-luciferase assays were performed as we described previously23.
HCV pseudoparticle entry assay
HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) with E1 and E2 glycoproteins derived from genotype 1a (H77) or genotype 2a (JFH1) and vesicular stomatitis virus pseudoparticles (VSVpp) were generated as we described previously23. Briefly, approximately 2.5 × 106 HEK293T cells were transfected with 2.5 μg of HCV E1E2 or VSV G envelope expressing plasmid, 7.75 μg of Gag-Pol (polymerase) packaging plasmid, and 7.75 μg of transfer vector encoding the firefly luciferase reporter protein by using polyethyleneimine (Sigma-Aldrich). At 48 h after transfection, supernatants containing HCVpp or VSVpp were collected. For the infection assay, Huh7.5 cells were transfected with siRNAs for 48 h and then infected with either HCVpp or VSVpp for 6 h. Cells were then replaced with fresh culture media. At 48 h postinfection, cells were harvested and luciferase activity was determined.
Binding and entry assays
Approximately 0.6 × 105 Huh7.5 cells seeded on 12-well plate were transfected with either negative control siRNA or SLC3A2 siRNA for 48 h. For HCV binding assay, cells were incubated with Jc1 at 4 °C for 2 h to allow virions for binding but not to internalize the target cells. After washing cells with PBS, bound virions were measured by qRT-PCR. For HCV entry assay, cells were also incubated with Jc1 at 4 °C for 2 h, washed with PBS and then temperature was shifted to 37 °C for 4 h to allow virions to internalize the cells. Cells were then trypsinized and washed twice with PBS to remove non-internalized virions. HCV entry was indirectly determined by analyzing the intracellular HCV RNA levels by qRT-PCR12,23.
Quantification of RNA
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments were performed as we reported previously12,23.
Single-cycle HCV infection
Single-cycle infectious HCV (HCVsc) was generated from a replicon trans-packaging system as previously described23. Briefly, Huh7.5 cells were cotransfected with pHH/SGR-Luc plasmid which carries a bicistronic HCV subgenomic replicon (NS3-NS5) firefly luciferase reporter with a Pol I promoter/terminator, and a HCV core-NS2 expression plasmid by using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Culture medium containing HCV-like infectious particle (HCV-LP) was collected at 5 days after transfection. For single-cycle HCV infection assay, Huh7.5 cells were pretreated with either negative control siRNA or siRNA targeting SLC3A2 for 48 h and then infected with HCVsc. At 48 h postinfection, cells were harvested and luciferase activity was determined.
Immunoprecipitation
HEK293T cells were cotransfected with V5-tagged E2 and either Flag-tagged SLC3A2 or Flag-tagged LAT1. Total amounts of DNA were adjusted by adding an empty vector. At 30 h after transfection, cells were harvested and immunoprecipitation assay was performed as we described previously12,23. Cells were lysed in buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 0.2% NP-40, and protease inhibitor cocktail, and then incubated for 10 min on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the indicated antibody. The samples were further precipitated with 40 μl of protein A beads (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were subsequently washed five times in washing buffer, and then bound proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis.
SLC3A2/LAT1 transporter inhibitor assay
SLC3A2/LAT1 transporter inhibitor, 2-aminobicyclo-(2,2,1)-heptane-carboxylic acid (BCH), was dissolved in 1N NH4OH and stored at room temperature. Final concentration of NH4OH in the medium was 200 μM. Huh7.5 cells were pre-incubated with various amounts of BCH in 1 h and then infected with Jc1 in the presence of BCH. At 48 h postinfection, cells were harvested and both RNA and protein levels were determined.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was determined by WST assay. Huh7.5 cells were either mock-infected or infected with Jc1 for 4 days and then treated with either NH4OH (vehicle) or BCH. Cells were re-plated onto 96-well plates at a density of ~2 × 103 cells per well. At the indicated time intervals after chemical treatment, 10 μL of WST solution was added to each well to determine cell growth.
Analysis of GDH enzymatic activity
Leucine stimulates GDH activity in hepatocytes40. In order to measure L-leucine uptake in Huh7.5 cells, the enzymatic activity of GDH was analyzed by using a GDH Activity Colorimetric Assay kit (BioVision, Catalog #K729-100) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. GDH activity was measured OD at 450 nm in a VersaMax Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices USA).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis. The asterisks on the figures indicate significant differences (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Ralf Bartenschlager (University of Heidelberg) for Jc1 construct and Dr. Charles Rice (The Rockefeller University) for Huh7.5 cells. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2018R1A2B2005390). This work was also funded by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) (2017R1C1B2004989).
Author Contributions
N.N.N. performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; S.C.T., T.T.L., T.T.N., H.T.P., L.P.N., H.N.M., J.W.C. performed experiments; Y.S.L. designed experiments, performed experiments; S.S.H. analyzed data; S.B.H. designed experiments, supervised the study and wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ngan N. T. Nguyen, Yun-Sook Lim and Lap P. Nguyen contributed equally.
References
- 1.Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2014;61:S45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suzuki T, Ishii K, Aizaki H, Wakita T. Hepatitis C viral life cycle. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007;59:1200–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Webster DP, Klenerman P, Dusheiko GM. Hepatitis C. Lancet. 2015;385:1124–1135. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62401-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cantor JM, Ginsberg MH. CD98 at the crossroads of adaptive immunity and cancer. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:1373–1382. doi: 10.1242/jcs.096040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ip H, Sethi T. CD98 signals controlling tumorigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2016;81:148–150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de la Ballina LR, et al. Amino acid transport associated to cluster of differentiation 98 heavy chain (CD98hc) is at the cross-road of oxidative stress and amino acid availability. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:9700–9711. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.704254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wagner CA, Lang F, Broer S. Function and structure of heterodimeric amino acid transporters. Am. J. Physiol. Cell physiol. 2001;281:1077–1093. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.4.C1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Palacin M, Estevez R, Bertran J, Zorzano A. Molecular biology of mammalian plasma membrane amino acid transporters. Physiol. Rev. 1998;78:969–1054. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.4.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poettler M, et al. CD98hc (SLC3A2) drives integrin-dependent renal cancer cell behavior. Mol. Cancer. 2013;12:169. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feral CC, et al. CD98hc (SLC3A2) mediates integrin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:355–360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404852102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nicklin P, et al. Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy. Cell. 2009;136:521–534. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Than TT, et al. Ankyrin repeat domain 1 is up-regulated during hepatitis C virus infection and regulates hepatitis C virus entry. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:20819. doi: 10.1038/srep20819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pietschmann T, et al. Construction and characterization of infectious intragenotypic and intergenotypic hepatitis C virus chimeras. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:7408–7413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504877103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ivanov AV, Bartosch B, Smirnova OA, Isaguliants MG, Kochetkov SN. HCV and oxidative stress in the liver. Viruses. 2013;5:439–469. doi: 10.3390/v5020439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang T, Weinman SA. Causes and consequences of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation in hepatitis C. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006;21(Suppl 3):S34–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li Y, Boehning DF, Qian T, Popov VL, Weinman SA. Hepatitis C virus core protein increases mitochondrial ROS production by stimulation of Ca2+ uniporter activity. FASEB J. 2007;21:2474–2485. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7345com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Garcia-Mediavilla MV, et al. Differential contribution of hepatitis C virus NS5A and core proteins to the induction of oxidative and nitrosative stress in human hepatocyte-derived cells. J. Hepatol. 2005;43:606–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pal S, et al. Hepatitis C virus induces oxidative stress, DNA damage and modulates the DNA repair enzyme NEIL1. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010;25:627–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06128.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Napolitano L, et al. LAT1 is the transport competent unit of the LAT1/CD98 heterodimeric amino acid transporter. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015;67:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shrivastava S, Bhanja Chowdhury J, Steele R, Ray R, Ray RB. Hepatitis C virus upregulates Beclin1 for induction of autophagy and activates mTOR signaling. J. Virol. 2012;86:8705–8712. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00616-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.George A, et al. Hepatitis C virus NS5A binds to the mRNA cap-binding eukaryotic translation initiation 4F (eIF4F) complex and up-regulates host translation initiation machinery through eIF4E-binding protein 1 inactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:5042–5058. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Batool A, Aashaq S, Andrabi KI. Reappraisal to the study of 4E-BP1 as an mTOR substrate-A normative critique. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2017;96:325–336. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Park C, et al. Pim kinase interacts with nonstructural 5A protein and regulates hepatitis C virus entry. J. Virol. 2015;89:10073–10086. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01707-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Q, Holst J. L-type amino acid transport and cancer: targeting the mTORC1 pathway to inhibit neoplasia. Amer. J. Cancer Res. 2015;5:1281–1294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prager GW, et al. CD98hc (SLC3A2), a novel marker in renal cell cancer. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;39:304–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dodd KM, Tee AR. Leucine and mTORC1: a complex relationship. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302:E1329–1342. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00525.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fu N, Yao H, Nan Y, Qiao L. Role of Oxidative stress in hepatitis C virus induced hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr. Cancer Drug. Targets. 2017;17:498–504. doi: 10.2174/1568009616666160926124043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Medvedev R, Ploen D, Hildt E. HCV and oxidative stress: Implications for HCV life cycle and HCV-associated pathogenesis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016;2016:9012580. doi: 10.1155/2016/9012580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Peng L, Liang D, Tong W, Li. J, Yuan Z. Hepatitis C virus NS5A activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, contributing to cell survival by disrupting the interaction between FK506-binding protein 38 (FKBP38) and mTOR. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:20870–20881. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.112045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Evans MJ, et al. Claudin-1 is a hepatitis C virus co-receptor required for a late step in entry. Nature. 2007;446:801–805. doi: 10.1038/nature05654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lindenbach BD, Rice CM. The ins and outs of hepatitis C virus entry and assembly. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:688–700. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scheel TK, Rice CM. Understanding the hepatitis C virus life cycle paves the way for highly effective therapies. Nat. Med. 2013;19:837–849. doi: 10.1038/nm.3248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zahid MN, et al. The postbinding activity of scavenger receptor class B type I mediates initiation of hepatitis C virus infection and viral dissemination. Hepatology. 2013;57:492–504. doi: 10.1002/hep.26097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Flint M, et al. Diverse CD81 proteins support hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 2006;80:11331–11342. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00104-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sharma NR, et al. Hepatitis C virus is primed by CD81 protein for low pH-dependent fusion. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:30361–30376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.263350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhu YZ, et al. Significance of palmitoylation of CD81 on its association with tetraspanin-enriched microdomains and mediating hepatitis C virus cell entry. Virology. 2012;429:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhu YZ, Qian XJ, Zhao P, Qi ZT. How hepatitis C virus invades hepatocytes: the mystery of viral entry. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3457–3467. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schroeder N, Chung CS, Chen CH, Liao CL, Chang W. The lipid raft-associated protein CD98 is required for vaccinia virus endocytosis. J. Virol. 2012;86:4868–4882. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06610-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Min S, et al. Abl tyrosine kinase regulates hepatitis C virus entry. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang T, et al. L-leucine stimulates glutamate dehydrogenase activity and glutamate synthesis by regulating mTORC1/SIRT4 pathway in pig liver. Anim. Nutr. 2018;3:329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]