Abstract
Therapeutic resistance of neoplasms is mainly attributed to gradual evolution of mutational profile1. Here, we demonstrate a microRNA-mediated mechanism that effectively improves fitness of SKBR3 mammary carcinoma cells by cytoplasmic reprogramming. The reprogramming is triggered by endogenous miR4673 transcribed from notch-1 locus. The miRNA downregulates cdk-18, a cyclin-dependent kinase that regulates M-G1 transition in cycling cells2,3. Suppression of cdk-18 triggers mitophagy and autophagy. Due to high autophagic flux, oestrogen receptor-1+/progesterone receptor+/p53+ (Esr1+/Pr+/p53+) SKBR3 cells are coerced into an Esr1−/Prlow/p53−profile. Increased mitophagy in combination with proteasomal degradation of p53 transiently arrests the cycling cells at G0 and enhances radio-resistance of the SKBR3 population. These findings highlight the impact on cancer therapy of non-encoded neoplastic resistance, arising as a consequence of miRNA-mediated autophagic reprogramming that uncouples phenotype and genotype.
Introduction
Tumour resistance attributed to clonal evolution of neoplastic cells, poses a major challenge for cancer therapy4. Clonality of neoplastic cells is mainly considered to reflect heterogeneity of mutational landscape5. In the proposed linear evolutionary model, the mutational landscape is shaped by selection for phenotypes that improve the fitness profile of neoplastic cells in a step-wise and protracted manner. Recent reports suggest, however, alternative routes to tumour resistance. One such mechanism is clonal competition that leads to oscillatory dominance of resistance subclones in response to treatment6. Similar reports of alternating phenotypic reversal6 suggest a more dynamic non-linear nature of tumour resistance that is not necessarily encoded. While, upstream mediators of “non-encoded” tumour resistance remain largely unknown, improved survival of a neoplastic population is underpinned by enhanced apoptotic threshold7,8.
Enhanced apoptotic threshold is typically caused by mutations that impair genomic surveillance mechanisms. In particular, loss-of-function mutations of the tumour suppressor gene p53 are associated with resistance to apoptosis9. While p53 has a short half-life in normal cells, DNA damage, among other sources of cellular stress, can stabilise p5310. The stabilised p53 in turn communicates cell cycle arrest and activates apoptotic signalling10. However, apoptosis is avoided if p53 activates concomitant autophagy as a pro-survival mechanism11. The increased autophagic flux promotes rapid degradation of p53 and prevents excessive accumulation of stable p53 and subsequent apoptosis11. Neoplastic cells commonly utilise the latter phenomenon to bypass p53-induced apoptosis via increased autophagic flux12. To that end, microRNAs are emerging as key regulators of autophagy in neoplastic cells13. While microRNAs inhibit various stages of the autophagy cascade from induction to vesicle nucleation14, there is no evidence for the positive induction of autophagy. Herein, we report efficient induction of autophagy by miRNA-4673 encoded in intron 4 of human notch-1 locus. The miRNA-induced autophagic flux depletes cytoplasmic p53 and improves post-radiation survival of neoplastic cells. The observed non-encoded induction of resistance is underpinned by miRNA-mediated cytoplasmic reprogramming.
Results
MiR4673 was initially detected in clinical samples of breast cancer patients15. Transcript level of miR4673 in neoplastic breast tissue is significantly higher than other tissues (Fig. 1a). We, therefore, selected the SKBR3 mammary carcinoma cell line with an extra copy of ligand-independent Erbb-2 (Her2) and high endogenous expression of miR4673 (Fig. 1a) to study potential involvement of miR4673 in induction/suppression of non-encoded resistance mechanisms.
Amplified miR4673 activity uncouples phenotype from genotype
In SKBR3 cells, signalling input from an additional copy of erbb-2 informs the neoplastic phenotype. Hyperactive erbb2 inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β)16 that activates MDM2 by phosphorylation. As a result, MDM2-dependent degradation of p53 is abolished17 (Fig. 1b). Likewise, catenin-β1 (key Wnt mediator) evades GSK3β-mediated degradation (Fig. 1b). We initially investigated the impact of miR4673 signalling on p53 and catenin-β1 as phenotypic landmarks of SKBR3 cells. Amplification of endogenous miRNA signalling (miRend) by an exogenous dose of the naked pre-miRNA (miRend+exo) significantly expanded the p53-/p21− population at the cost of p53+/p21+ cells within 24 h (45 to 86%; Fig. 1c, d). Quenching of the endogenous miRNA by application of an antisense RNA (ASΔzen, 100 nM, 2 × 105 cells) largely reversed the observed phenomenon (45 to 14%; Fig. 1c, d) within the same timeframe. A similar bistable trend following amplification/inhibition of the endogenous miRNA signalling was noted for catenin-β1 (Fig. 1c). Concurrent reduction in miRend+exo cells of both intracellular Notch-1 and antagonistic catenin-β118, hinted at a non-selective depletion of the intracellular protein pool (Fig. 1c, d).
MiR4673 does not target p53, catenin-β1, notch-1 and erbb-2 directly. Hence, offsetting the anti-catabolic signalling input from hyperactive Erbb2 can be accomplished by post-transcriptional (Ago2-dependent RNA silencing) and/or post-translational (mTOR-dependent autophagy) mechanisms (Fig. 1c, d bottom). As predicted, miRend+exo cells demonstrated Ago2high/mTORlow profile in contrast to the Ago2low/mTORhigh fingerprint of ASΔzen cells. The miR-mediated Ago2high profile communicates enhanced Ago2-dependent RNA silencing19. The mTORlow profile, on the other hand, is consistent with increased autophagic flux20. In addition to autophagy, downregulation of mTOR reduces protein synthesis via ribosomal S6 kinase21 and 4E-BP1 (Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Binding Protein 1)22. The findings suggest that the Ago2high/mTORlow profile uncouples genotype and phenotype by non-selective depletion of intracellular protein reservoir. We, therefore, investigated potential impact of phenotypic uncoupling on the breast cancer diagnostic fingerprint23 informed by availability of Esr1, Pr, and Erbb2 proteins.
Phenotype/genotype uncoupling distorts the diagnostic portrait of neoplastic cells
Forced signalling by the microRNA (miRend+exo) coerced an Esr− and Prlow molecular profile in the neoplastic cells (Fig. 2a) similar to the miR-induced depletion of catenin-β1 and p53. The miRNA also restored normal membranous representation of Erbb2 in Erbb2high neoplastic cells by overriding transcriptional input from the extra copy of the gene (Fig. 2a). In agreement with our findings, proteasomal degradation can effectively exhaust the cellular reservoir of Erbb224 and ESR-125 despite active transcription and translation. The supervisory dominance of proteasomal activity over transcription is often invoked during development to offset transcriptional noise and induce signalling robustness26. The same capacity is recapitulated in response to stressors where p27 induces autophagy and cell cycle arrest as a pro-survival mechanism27. Interestingly, we noted re-emergence of nuclear Ki-67 (Fig. 2a) following inhibition of the endogenous miRNA (ASΔzen) that suggests entry into the interphase28. One interpretation is that enhanced protein degradation in miRend+exo SKBR3 cells impacts on availability of cyclins and arrests the cells at G0 phase. In a parallel scenario, serum starvation arrests cycling cells at G0 by upregulating autophagy29. The quiescent cells arrested at G0 are expected to become more resistant to stressors due to autophagy. As expected, the miRend+exo cells changed morphology, became more adherent and demonstrated higher survival rate and faster recovery following UVC irradiation (Fig. 2b). Enforced adherence to matrix suggested stabilised integrin-based focal adhesions. Focal adhesion kinase signalling, in turn, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p2730 and improves tolerance to DNA damage31 caused by irradiation. We, therefore, sought a molecular mechanism that explains the increased protein degradation and G0 arrest instructed by miR4673 signalling.
A faux stress signal improves fitness of neoplastic cells by invoking a G0 molecular signature
We identified Cdk-18, the closest mammalian homologue of yeast Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase, as a potential target of miR4673 (Fig. 3a). In yeast, Pho85 acts as a nutrient sensor32 that licences M-G1 transition in cell cycle3. Pho85 downregulates autophagy33 to propel cell cycle progression after mitosis. In response to nutrient deprivation, pho85 induces arrest at G0 to improve the survival of yeast cells. Likewise, the human homologue (PCTAIRE Protein Kinase 3 or cdk-18) acts downstream of cyclin-A234 to drive cell cycle progression. The impact on cell cycle of Cdk-18 occurs in part by relieving endoplasmic reticulum stress35 and concomitant autophagy36 to restore activity of cyclins that drive progression through G1/S37. Sequential application of exogenous miRNA (200 nM, 2 × 105 cells) resulted in near-complete post-transcriptional inhibition of cdk-18 (Fig. 3a). The inhibition of cdk-18 inactivates cofilin34 that manifests as reduced actin depolymerisation in miRend+exo cells (Fig. 3b). The miR4673-mediated suppression of Cdk-18 also explains the upregulated autophagy/mitophagy in miRend+exo cells35 (Fig. 3b). The diminished mitochondrial activity subsequent to mitophagy not only contributes to radio-resistance38 (Fig. 2b) but can also indirectly trigger redox-dependent polymerisation of actin microfilaments39 (Fig. 3b). Enhanced mitophagy downstream to miR4673 signalling effectively offsets Paclitaxel-induced perinuclear localisation of mitochondria shown to trigger apoptosis by imposing an oxidative burden on the nucleus40 (Fig. 3b). Arguably, communication of faux nutrient deprivation signal (Cdk-18− equivalent to Pho85−) by miR4673 triggers a key stress-response with concomitant autophagy/mitophagy that improves plasticity and survival capacity of neoplastic cells. The application of exogenous miRNA-4673 enhanced the induction of autophagy and progression to autophagosome formation and subsequent degradation of the cargo (Fig. 4a–d). The inhibition of autophagic flux partially restored the molecular profile of SKBR3 cells in miRend + exo cells (Fig. 4e, f). The latter also explains entry into interphase following the suppression of miR4673 (ki-67+ ASΔzen cells in Fig. 2a) that communicates an absence of stressors. We further dissected the impact of faux metabolic stress (cdk-18− profile) on transcriptional fingerprint of cycling miRend+exo cells.
The cateninβ1-cylinD1-retinoblastoma axis, as the major propellant of cell cycle41,42, was focused upon. A key transcriptional signature of miRend+exo cells was downregulation of cyclin-D1 short isoform that lacks the cyclin box required for cdk4/6-mediated phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein41 (Fig. 5a). A similar trend was evident in alternative splicing of catenin-β1 following the amplification of miR4673. The transcriptional suppression of truncated cyclin-D1 eliminates decoy protein (alternatively spliced with no cyclin box) that can inhibit the Rb-E2f cascade at G0 (Fig. 5a). The elimination of decoy truncated catenin-β1 (with actin binding and phosphorylation domains) enhances the phosphorylation likelihood of full length protein required for trans-signalling43 (Fig. 5a). Transcriptional repression of Notch-1 (antagonist of catenin-β1) further energises the activated cateninβ1-cylinD1-Rb axis at M-G1 transition during cell cycle. Activation of the latter axis in G0-arrested cdk-18−/miRend+exo cells occurs in anticipation of progress into G1. Enhanced autophagy, by proteasomal degradation (Fig. 1c), offsets the activity of cateninβ1−cylinD1-Rb axis and arrests the miRend+exo cells at G0. Another prominent transcriptional change following amplified miR4673 signalling was silencing of Brca2 and X-Ray Repair Cross Complementing 3 (Xrcc3). Brca2 and Xrcc3 are critical components of homologous recombination (HR) machinery44,45. Inhibition of BRCA2 and XRCC3, which suggests inactivation of HR, is also a signature of G0/early G146. The inhibition of HR alters the balance in favour of error-prone non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). The remarkably accelerated dynamics of NHEJ compared to HR in repairing DNA breaks (≈30 min versus > 7 h)47 contributes to post-radiation survival and recovery48,49 of miRend+exo SKBR3 cells. Transcriptional silencing of Brca2 may in part reflect the depletion of upstream activator ESR-1 by autophagy (Fig. 2a)50. On the other hand, the mitophagy-mediated switch to glycolysis exhausts the cellular supply of NAD+ and decreases NAD+/NADH ratio that in turn triggers transcriptional silencing of brca-151. The findings point to a stress signature invoked by endogenous miR4673 signalling compatible with G0 molecular fingerprint (Fig. 5b). The latter is aligned to the ancestral role of Pho85 (Cdk-18 homologue) in signalling G0 arrest in response to stressors3. Hence, suppression of cdk-18 by miR4673 communicates a faux stress signal analogous to stress-mediated inhibition of Pho85 that triggers pro-survival autophagy and stress adaptation. In addition to G0 lengthening, downregulation of brca1, brca2, and xrcc3 combined with proteasomal degradation of p53 can potentially relax the G1-S checkpoint and accelerate interphase during which cells are more susceptible to DNA damage (Fig. 5c). Acceleration of interphase by suppressing the G1 checkpoint is a feature of embryonic stem cells52 and it is not uncommon for neoplastic cells to recapitulate aspects of ontogeny. In our proposed model for reprogramming of cell cycle by miR4673 activity, miRend+exo cells dwell longer in G0 (stress-resistant phase) and progress more rapidly through G1 (sensitive phase).
We confirmed miR4673-induced cell cycle reprogramming by dissecting the population growth dynamics of miRend+exo cells SKBR3 cells. In contrast to smooth exponential growth of control cells, sequential application of the exogenous miRNA induced periods of dormancy followed by episodic population growth (Fig. 6a). This behaviour was consistent with transient cell cycle arrest at G0 (dormancy) followed by fast synchronised cycling and division (episodic population growth) (Fig. 6b). The unchanged growth rate despite arrest at G0 indicated a reciprocal shortening of interphase (Fig. 6a). Reprogramming of cell cycle by miR4673 can potentially improve resistance profile of the neoplastic cells by lengthening G0 (resistant phase) and simultaneous shortening of interphase (sensitive phase). We next explored endogenous transcriptional oscillations of miR4673 and the associated downstream genes that instruct windows of resistance in neoplastic populations. The cells were first synchronised at G0 by serum starvation. Subsequent to addition of serum, a high-resolution temporal fingerprint of endogenous miR4673 and associated genes, that instruct the population fitness of SKBR3 cells, was generated.
Endogenous oscillations of miR4673 and the downstream cascade portray a variable resistance landscape
Transcriptional activity of the endogenous miRNA and the host gene notch-1 oscillated with a periodicity of 2 h (Fig. 7). These results are consistent with the reported periodicity of notch-1 oscillations53. Notably, amplitude of the miRNA oscillation ([max]:[min]≈80-fold) was much higher than notch-1 oscillation ([max]:[min]≈3-fold). In addition, notch-1 oscillation lagged behind that of the endogenous miRNA by 1 h. Concurrent oscillation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress was measured based on shift in the alternative spliced product of X-Box Binding Protein 1 (xbp-1)54. High endoplasmic reticulum stress (characterised by abundance of short alternative splicing product of xbp-1) temporally accorded with peak miR4673 transcriptional activity (Fig. 7a). The transcription of rad51 recombinase (a core component of HR) and PPP1R13B (ASPP1; a positive regulator of p53 activity) and xrcc3 showed a periodicity of 1–1.5 h and was repressed concurrent with the second peak activity of miR4673 (Fig. 7). Transcription from brca-1 was, however, totally in phase with oscillations of miR4673 and showed a periodicity of 2 h. We fingerprinted Snail family members as potent inducers of G0 arrest and neoplastic resistance55. The transcriptional fingerprint of twist-1, a trans-acting partner for notch-156, was temporally aligned to the latter gene and showed a periodicity of 2 h (Fig. 7). The transcriptional oscillation of snai-2 as a downstream target of Notch-157 accorded with twist-1 expression (periodicity: 1.5 h). These oscillatory fingerprints foreshadow the alignment of endogenous miR4673 oscillations to the windows of resistance that occur at intervals of ≈2 h. We, therefore, tested the contribution of miR4673 to the adaptation of SKBR3 cells to the acute stressor, ionising radiation.
Endogenous signalling by miR4673 improves the survival likelihood of SKBR3 cells
We modelled the contribution of endogenous miR4673 to post-radiation survival of the neoplastic cells based on Poisson statistics and assumption of “single-target single-hit”58. The binary model assumes that a single exposure to the radiation is sensitive enough to kill the impacted cell. Hence if the radiation hits a cell “k” times, the likelihood of escape from the impact of radiation or P(k = 0) in Poisson probability space corresponds to:
Where m (dose correction parameter) is proportional to the probability of exposure to the radiation. To measure endogenous variability in resistance, SKBR3 cells were exposed to ionising radiation at sequential time points 1 h apart. Notably, the post-radiation survival rate (SR) of control SKBR3 cells (with endogenous miR4673) oscillated with a periodicity of 2–3 h (Fig. 8a). The endogenous difference between the maximum SR (t3) and the minimum SR (t1) in the control group based on Poisson statistics
indicated ≈2.5-fold reduction of the impact of radiation on population from t1 to t3 (measured based on day 1 post-radiation SR). We then translated the ≈2.5-fold reduction of radiation impact at a population-level to the improved fitness of individual cells based on the growth of parameter “m” from t1 to t3
The growth by 1.14 unit of the parameter “m”, that is given a default value of 1 based on the “one hit one target” model, corresponds to a halved probability of death by irradiation for individual cells. Therefore, two hits are required to cause lethality based on Poisson’s model. On the other hand, a single exogenous dose of miR4673 (Fig. 8b, c) reduced the impact of radiation on neoplastic cells at t4 by
where m2 and m refer to irradiated miRendo+exo and control groups, respectively. Enhanced survival rate after exogenous application of miR4673 at t4 (2.4-fold) approached the maximal endogenous radio-resistance (2.5-fold). Further, amplified miR4673 signalling enhanced the incidence of radio-resistant periods by two fold at 100 nM (Fig. 8b) and by three fold at 200 nM (Fig. 8c). Remarkably, a second dose of radiation at day 19 triggered a reversal of the survival profile at t3 in the control group (dotted lines in Fig. 8a–c) and at t4 in the miRendo+exo population consistent with the non-encoded nature of radio-resistance. The application of Chloroquine reduced the mean survival rate in both miRend and miRend+exo SKBR3 cell to ≈10% (Fig. 8d). We, therefore, propose a model for the miR473-induced enhancement of neoplastic fitness profile (Fig. 8e) where 50% increased resistance of individual neoplastic cells anticipates a 2.5-fold improvement of the population survival rate at any time point. In our proposed model, miR4673 signalling also increases the incidence of resistant temporal windows.
Discussion
The findings reported herein attest to plasticity of molecular signatures that inform non-encoded resistance in a neoplastic population. Plasticity results from miR4673 signalling that upregulates proteasomal degradation and overrides the transcriptional fingerprint of SKBR3 cells. The resultant phenotypic uncoupling significantly improves fitness profile of the neoplastic population. Phenotypic uncoupling is particularly manifest in the repressed profile of p53 following the amplification of miR4673.
Tumour suppressor p53 is a key target of human oncogenic miRNAs. MiR-125b, for example, downregulates p53 by targeting the 3ˊ-untranslated region (UTR) of the transcript in human neuroblastoma cells and human lung fibroblast cells59. Likewise, miR504-mediated suppression of p53 enhances the resistance of neoplastic cells by increasing the threshold of apoptosis60. Hybridisation to the UTR, however, triggers partial inhibition of the targeted transcript61. In contrast, indirect inhibition of p53 by miR4673-mediated autophagy leads to near-complete suppression of the protein. Direct targeting of xrcc3 by miR4673 complemented indirect suppression of p53. Notably, loss-of-function mutations of XRCC3 attenuate the apoptotic signalling in neoplastic cells62. At a population-level, reprogramming of cell cycle by miR4673 (transient arrest at G0 followed by accelerated interphase) maximises the resistance of neoplastic cells. Enhanced autophagy is the key to the major phenotypic manifestations of miR4673 signalling.
The autophagy-mediated nuclear uncoupling reflects a developmental capacity to reprogram the proliferating cells by depletion of cytoplasmic protein repertoire63. The most remarkable example of the nuclear uncoupling occurs during reprogramming of the highly differentiated oocyte into undifferentiated zygote by complete degradation of maternal proteins64. Mitophagy is also commonly employed in physiological processes 65. Differentiation of the reticulocytes, for example, is governed by amplified mitophagy66. Recapitulation of autophagy-mediated reprogramming enables neoplastic cells to adapt to stressful situations 67. In response to the application of anticancer drugs autophagy can act as a pro-survival mechanism68. Autophagy also improves resistance to ionising radiation69. The induction of autophagy by miR4673 is unique as most reported human microRNAs are negative regulators of autophagy14. Some other aspects of the autophagic reprograming by miR4673 are also worthy of attention.
A distinguishing feature of signalling by miR4673 is system-level interactions that complement autophagy-mediated reprogramming and enhance the potency of the microRNA signalling. Suppression by autophagy of p53, for example, is complemented by transcriptional inhibition of xrcc3. Another distinguishing feature of miR4673 signalling is acute endogenous oscillations of the miRNA (every 2 h). These transcriptional oscillations are aligned to temporal behaviour of notch-1, the host locus of miR4673. Transcription from Notch-1 locus and the associated downstream mediators oscillates with a periodicity of 2 h53. The transcriptional oscillations of miR4673 accommodate windows of neoplastic resistance with potential implication for therapy. The phenotypic variability may also impact on the accuracy of diagnosis by distorting the molecular fingerprint of tumours. Finally, the non-encoded nature of the described reprogramming mechanism suggests that the capacity may be available to other neoplastic cells with active transcription from notch-1 locus. Even in the absence of active transcription, epigenetic remodelling may unlock this capacity and alter the behaviour and molecular profile of the neoplasm acutely.
From a diagnostic perspective, cytoplasmic reprogramming by autophagy can potentially alter the molecular fingerprint of neoplastic cells. Non-encoded reprogramming of SKBR3 cells by miR4673, for example, communicates a Esr1-/Prlow/erbb2low subtype that can potentially indicate more aggressive treatment options. In parallel, the enhanced fitness profile not only improves real-time survival of neoplastic cells but also facilitates accumulation of iatrogenic genetic changes that may in turn propel a switch from non-encoded to encoded (genetic) resistance associated with poor prognosis70.
From a therapeutic perspective, non-encoded homogeneity is not without consequences. Our findings demonstrate that miR4673 improves radiation resistance of SKBR3 cells by 50% that translates into a 2.4-fold higher survival rate of the population. The improved fitness results from increased mitophagy that enhances anti-oxidant capacity of the neoplastic cells. The inhibition of homologous recombination machinery to empower non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) cascade also improves DNA repair capacity. This effect is particularly manifest in resistance to ionising radiation where accumulating evidence indicates an indispensable role of NHEJ in repair of DNA damage48,49,71.
In conclusion, we have uncovered a non-coded route to tumour resistance (as opposed to mutational resistance) that results from intrinsic oscillations of miR4673 expressed at high levels in breast cancer. The signalling cascade utilised by the microRNA may be targeted to reveal the true molecular fingerprint of tumour by inhibition of the autophagic reprogramming. Suppression of the endogenous miRNA may also improve the response to therapy.
Methods
Materials and reagents
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. unless stated otherwise. All primers were purchased from IDT DNA.
Cell culture
SKBR3 cell line was purchased from ATCC cell bank (ATCC® HTB-30™). Cells were cultured in standard McCoys-5A medium (Sigma-Aldrich®, M4892) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco™) and were split at ≈75% confluence. All the experiments were performed at a similar confluency rate. Serum starvation method was utilised to synchronise the cycling cells at G0.
Electroporation
For electroporation, cells were harvested and resuspended in a modified “Intracellular buffer”72 composed of HEPES (200 nM), MgCl2 (1.35 μΜ), Glutathione (10 μΜ) pH: 7.4. ECM-830 square wave generator (Harvard Apparatus BTX) was used for electroporation. The settings were 4 pulses of 1.6 kV/cm, 710 μs, at intervals of 1 s. After electroporation cells were transferred into T25 flasks (Falcon®). Naked microRNA-4673 was applied at 400 nM/2 × 106 cells. Inhibition of the endogenous miRNA was achieved by utilising 2′-O-Methyl antisense RNA inhibitors (application dose: 200 nM/2 × 106 HNPs) rendered RNAse-resistant by terminal N,N-diethyl-4-(4-nitronaphthalen-1-ylazo)-phenylamine (ZENTM, IDTDNA).
UVC irradiation
SkBr3 cells were were collected and transferred into a 6-well-plate and cultured for 2 days. A 30 Watt UVC generator at a distance of 40 cm from the plate was used as a source of ionising radiation. The UVC lamp was turned on for 3 × 20 s with 10 s intervals. The cells were then immediately supplemented with fresh McCoys media.
RNA isolation
RNA was isolated using a Trizol reagent. Bromochloro (0.1 M) was added per 1 ml TRIzol® Reagent (Ambion, 15596018). The tubes were vortex then centrifuged for 15 min at 12000 g at 4 °C. The aqueous phase was mixed with 2 μl of 5 μg/μl linear polyacrylamide (ambion) and 500 μl of isopropanol. The solution was then vortexed then left to incubate at room temperature. The solution was then centrifuged for 1 h at 20,000 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded followed by the pellet being washed with 1 ml of ice cold 200-proof ethanol. The sample was then vortexed followed by centrifugation for 30 min at 12,000 × g at 4 °C and the supernatant was discarded. The RNA pellet was left to air dry, then resuspended in 50 μl of RNAse free H2O (Ambion™ AM9937) and stored at ‒80 °C.
Reverse transcription
After DNase treatment, reverse transcription of extracted RNA was carried out by using a mixture of reverse primers (2pmole/primer, 4 μl total RNA, 1 μl dNTP mix (10 mM each), 4 μl of 5x First-Strand Buffer, 1 μl of 0.1 M diothiothreitol (DTT), 1 μl of RNAseOUT (40U/μl), 1 μl (200U) of Superscript-III reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcription was performed at 50 °C for 1 h.
Real-time qPCR
Real-time quantitative PCR (38 cycles) was performed using SensiFAST™ SYBR® Lo-ROX reagents (BIOLINE®). Reaction mix comprised of 2 μl of cDNA, 400 nM inner primers (1.5 μl/primer), 10 μl of 2x SensiFAST SYBR Lo-ROX Mix, and 5 μl of PCR-grade water on a Stratagene® Mx3000P real-time PCR instrument. Average efficiency of PCR amplification for each gene of interest was quantified based on a linear regression model using the LineRegPCR software73. The relative (normalised to β-actin) expression ratio of gene of interest (test: control) was then calculated using the efficiency of amplification (Eff.) values based on the method proposed by Pffai74 as follows:
To generate the temporal fingerprints of genes, we used a variation of the above method:
Where min. refers to the time point with minimum expression level of the gene of interest and all other time points are normalised to min.
Melt curve analysis and visual inspection of the amplified products on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed the presence of target amplicons. Relative expression of transcripts for each gene was plotted as ratio between the average concentration of transcript in the test and control groups normalised to the average concentration of β-actin transcripts in both groups (above formula). The primers used in the current study are presented at Supplementary Table 1.
Stem-loop PCR for detection of endogenous miRNA
Small RNA from proliferating HNPs was isolated using mirVana™ miRNA isolation Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Detection of the miRNA-4673 was accomplished using stem-loop PCR as described elsewhere75. Specific primers were designed for reverse transcription and stem-loop RT-PCR amplification of the miRNA as shown in Supplementary Table 2. Reverse transcription of the extracted small RNA was carried out using a mixture of 1 μl of 5 μM room temperature (RT) primer, 4 μl total RNA, 1 μl dNTP Mix (10 mM each), 4 μl of 5x First-Strand Buffer, 2 μl of 0.1 M DTT, 1 μl of RNaseOUT (40 units/μl), 1 μl (200 units) of SuperScript-III reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcription was performed at 16 ˚C for 30 min followed by 42 ˚C for 30 min. PCR reaction (35 cycles) comprised 4 μl of template cDNA, 1 μl of 5 μM forward/reverse primers, 12.5 μl of HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen) and 6 μl of PCR-grade water. PCR amplification was achieved through 40 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 15 s) and annealing (60 °C, 45 s). After PCR amplification, products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel at 5 V/cm, stained in SYBR Gold for 45 min and destained in 1 × TAE buffer for 30 min before imaging. Imaging was performed using the MultiDoc-It™ Imaging System.
Immunohistochemistry
After blocking in incubation buffer containing 0.1 M PBS, 1% BSA, 0.1% Tween-20, and 5% normal goat serum (for detection with rabbit Abs) or 5% normal rabbit serum (for detection with mouse Abs) for 40 min, sections were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 ˚C and secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature as per Supplementary Table 3. Specificity controls were carried out by incubating sections with rabbit or mouse IgG negative control antibodies.
Primary antibody characterisation
Mouse monoclonal anti-p53 antibody (Abcam, catalogue no. ab26) recognises both mutant forms and wild-type human p53. The immunogen is gel-purified p53-beta-galactosidase fusion protein containing murine p53 from aa14-389 (derived from pSV53C cDNA clone). Mapping has demonstrated specificity to amino acids 213 to 217 on human p53 protein. The lysate from NIH/3T3 cells treated with 1 M doxorubicin for 24 h revealed a single band at 50 kDa corresponding to molecular weight of P53 [manufacturer’s technical information].
Rabbit polyclonal anti-P21 (Abcam, catalogue no. ab109199) detects a clean band at 21 kDa corresponding to p21, as well as a cross-reacting band at 26 kDa [manufacturer’s technical information]. The immunogen is a synthetic peptide conjugated to KLH derived from within residues 100 to the C-terminus of Human p21.
Rabbit polyclonal anti-Notch-1 (Abcam, catalogue no. ab8925) recognises an epitope (VLLSRKRRRQHGQC) that is only exposed after gamma secretase cleavage and is not accessible in the uncleaved form. The immunogen is human N-terminal sequence of the cleaved Notch-1 intracellular domain (amino acids 1755–1767).
Mouse monoclonal anti-tapa1 antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab79559) in Western blot recognises the low-molecular weight 26 kDa subunit of human tapa1. Immunogen is MOLT4 (human T-ALL cell line)
Monoclonal anti-mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab2732) was raised in Rabbit, which was immunised with a proprietary synthetic peptide within Human mTOR (aa 200–250). Western blotting shows a band at ≈ 250 kDa.
Mouse monoclonal anti-argonaute-2 (Ago2) antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab57113). The immunogen is recombinant fragment corresponding to human Ago2 aa483-859 and in western blots the antibody recognises a band of molecular weight 97 kDa.
The nestin antibody (Millipore, Bedford, MA; cat. no. MAB5326; clone 10C2) was raised in mouse by using a fusion protein. The antibody reacts specifically with human nestin and it recognises a major band at 200–220 kDa in western blot of human umbilical vein endothelial-cell (HUVEC) lysates (manufacturer’s technical information).
Polyclonal anti-Catenin-β1 antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab6302) was raised in Rabbit immunised with synthetic peptide (PGDSNQLAWFDTDL) conjugated to KLH and corresponding to amino acids 768–781 of Human β-Catenin. The antibody does not cross-react with a-catenin or γ-catenin (plakoglobin). In western blotting of extracts from Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cultured cells the antibody recognises a single band of 94 kDa molecular weight.
Monoclonal anti-Oestrogen Receptor α1 (ESR1) antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab32063) was raised in Rabbit immunised with a proprietary synthetic peptide. In western blots the antibody recognises a single band at molecular weight of 60 kDa.
Mouse monoclonal anti-Progesterone Receptor (PGR) antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab2765). The antibody detects the B form of progesterone receptor and does not cross-react with oestrogen receptor or glucocorticoid receptor. The immunogenicity corresponds to chicken progesterone receptor and is purified using chick oviduct cytosol. Western blots detected a single band at 99 kDa.
Mouse monoclonal anti-Erbb2 antibody (Abcam; cat. no. Ab16901) was immunised with a synthetic peptide (TAENPEYLGLDVPV) which corresponds to C terminal amino acid 1242–1255 of human c-Erbb2.
Mouse monoclonal anti Ki-67 antibody (Dako, catalogue No. M72404) detects a nuclear protein Ki-67 antigen. The Ki-67 antigen is preferentially expressed during all active phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2 and M-phases), but it is absent in resting cells (G0-phase)76. Two isoforms of 345 and 395 kDa have been identified77. In western blotting of lysates of the multiple myeloma cell line, IM-9, the antibody labels bands of 345 and 395 kDa, identical to isoforms of Ki-67 protein (manufacturer’s technical information).
Autophagy inhibitors
To inhibit the autophagic flux, Bafilomycin A1 (Sigma) and Chloroquine (Sigma) were applied at a final concentration of 10 nM and 50 μM, respectively. The cells were incubated with the inhibitors for 16 h and then processed for immunohistochemical staining as outlined before.
Western blotting
Extracted proteins were separated re-separated by PAGE using gradient 5 to 12% minigels, transferred to 0.2-μm nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) and blocked for ≥ 2 h with 3% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) in 0.1 M Tris buffered salts solution pH 7.4 (TBS). Blotted antigens were incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti-HSP-70 (2 μg/ml, Abcam ab2897), rabbit monoclonal anti-Beclin-1(2 μg/ml, Abcam ab207612), rabbit polyclonal antiLC3β (1 μg/ml Abcam ab51520) and rabbit polyclonal anti-p62 (2 μg/ml Abcam ab91526), 0.05% Tween20/TBS for 2 h, washed and subsequently incubated with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated secondary antibody (goat-anti rabbit/mouse IgG, DAKO, Denmark) diluted 1:1500 in Tween20/TBS for 2 h. Bound antibody was visualised with AP substrate (BioRad).
Live-imaging analysis of pftLC3 autophagy reporter
The autophagy reporter plasmid, ptfLC3, was a gift from Tamotsu Yoshimori (Addgene plasmid #21074). SKBR3 cells were electroporated with the reporter plasmid alone or in combination with miR4673 as described before. For live-imaging analysis cells were cultured in 6-well plates overnight and transferred into the live-imaging platform (Leica DMI6000B live cell imaging microscope). Phase contrast images were captured every 30 min for 16 h from multiple wells (20x magnification). To analyse mitotic activity, images were imported into FIJI (ImageJ) platform.
Transmission electron microscopy
For TEM analysis, samples were fixed in Karnovsky’s fixative overnight at room temperature followed by post-fixation in OsO4 for 1 h. Preparations were dehydrated in graded alcohols and embedded in low viscosity resin (TAAB Laboratory and Microscopy, United Kingdom). Ultrathin sections were mounted on Pioloform/formvar coated slot grids, stained in uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined in a Phillips CM120 BioTWIN electron microscope.
Bioinformatics analysis
The expression profile of miR4673 in various human tissues was extracted from the miRmine database as per Supplementary Table 4. The raw output was analysed and a graph generated using the GraphPad software.
Quantification and statistical analysis
SPSS statistical software (SPSS v.16, Chicago, Illinois, US) was used for the statistical analysis of data. The relative expression levels of genes of interest were compared using non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. In the present study, a p-value < 0.01 was considered as statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank professor Neil Hunter for critical review of the manuscript.
Authors' contributions
R.F. conceived the idea, designed the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. K.D. assisted in design of experiments and performed the experiments and assisted in analysis of the results and writing the manuscript. M.S. performed electron microscopy. This study was supported by NIDCR grant R01 DE015272-07 and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council grant 512524.3.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by G. M. Fimia
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-1088-6).
References
- 1.Marusyk A, Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1805;105-117:2010. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aerne BL, Johnson AL, Toyn JH, Johnston LH. Swi5 controls a novel wave of cyclin synthesis in late mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998;9:945–956. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.4.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tennyson CN, Lee J, Andrews BJ. A role for the Pcl9-Pho85 cyclin-cdk complex at the M/G1 boundary in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;28:69–79. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Ratain MJ, Siu LL. Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature. 2013;501:355–364. doi: 10.1038/nature12627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science. 1976;194:23–28. doi: 10.1126/science.959840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Keats JJ, et al. Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120:1067–1076. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-405985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fisher DE. Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the threshold. Cell. 1994;78:539–542. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90518-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reed JC. Dysregulation of apoptosis in cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:2941–2953. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, Housman DE. p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell. 1993;74:957–967. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90719-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ashcroft Margaret, Vousden Karen H. Regulation of p53 stability. Oncogene. 1999;18(53):7637–7643. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reinhart BJ, et al. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2000;403:901–906. doi: 10.1038/35002607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mathew R, Karantza-Wadsworth V, White E. Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:961–967. doi: 10.1038/nrc2254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gozuacik D, Akkoc Y, Ozturk DG, Kocak M. Autophagy-Regulating microRNAs and Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2017;7:65. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Frankel LB, Lund AH. MicroRNA regulation of autophagy. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:2018–2025. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Persson H, et al. Identification of new microRNAs in paired normal and tumor breast tissue suggests a dual role for the ERBB2/Her2 gene. Cancer Res. 2011;71:78–86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zaoui K, Benseddik K, Daou P, Salaun D, Badache A. ErbB2 receptor controls microtubule capture by recruiting ACF7 to the plasma membrane of migrating cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:18517–18522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000975107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kulikov R., Boehme K. A., Blattner C. Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3-Dependent Phosphorylation of Mdm2 Regulates p53 Abundance. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2005;25(16):7170–7180. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7170-7180.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jin YH, et al. Beta-catenin modulates the level and transcriptional activity of Notch1/NICD through its direct interaction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1793:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chendrimada TP, et al. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005;436:740–744. doi: 10.1038/nature03868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:132–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Magnuson B, Ekim B, Fingar DC. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem. J. 2012;441:1–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gingras AC, et al. Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1422–1437. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Osborne CK, Yochmowitz MG, Knight WA, 3rd, McGuire WL. The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer. 1980;46:2884–2888. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2884::AID-CNCR2820461429>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marx C, Held JM, Gibson BW, Benz CC. ErbB2 trafficking and degradation associated with K48 and K63 polyubiquitination. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3709–3717. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Valley CC, Solodin NM, Powers GL, Ellison SJ, Alarid ET. Temporal variation in estrogen receptor-alpha protein turnover in the presence of estrogen. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008;40:23–34. doi: 10.1677/JME-07-0067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Muratani M, Tansey WP. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4:192–201. doi: 10.1038/nrm1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liang J, et al. The energy sensing LKB1-AMPK pathway regulatesp27(kip1) phosphorylation mediating the decision to enter autophagy or apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:218–224. doi: 10.1038/ncb1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sobecki M, et al. Cell-cycle regulation accounts for variability in Ki-67 expression levels. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2722–2734. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shang L, et al. Nutrient starvation elicits an acute autophagic response mediated by Ulk1 dephosphorylation and its subsequent dissociation from AMPK. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:4788–4793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100844108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bryant P, Zheng Q, Pumiglia K. Focal adhesion kinase controls cellular levels of p27/Kip1 and p21/Cip1 through Skp2-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:4201–4213. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01612-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tavora B, et al. Endothelial-cell FAK targeting sensitizes tumours to DNA-damaging therapy. Nature. 2014;514:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature13541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang D, Friesen H, Andrews B. Pho85, a multifunctional cyclin-dependent protein kinase in budding yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 2007;66:303–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang Z, Wilson WA, Fujino MA, Roach PJ. Antagonistic controls of autophagy and glycogen accumulation by Snf1p, the yeast homolog of AMP-activated protein kinase, and the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21:5742–5752. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.17.5742-5752.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matsuda S, et al. PCTAIRE kinase 3/cyclin-dependent kinase 18 is activated through association with cyclin A and/or phosphorylation by protein kinase A. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:18387–18400. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.542936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Palmer KJ, Konkel JE, Stephens DJ. PCTAIRE protein kinases interact directly with the COPII complex and modulate secretory cargo transport. J. Cell. Sci. 2005;118:3839–3847. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ogata M, et al. Autophagy is activated for cell survival after endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:9220–9231. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01453-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vijayaraghavan S, et al. CDK4/6 and autophagy inhibitors synergistically induce senescence in Rb positive cytoplasmic cyclin E negative cancers. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15916. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhu L, Mou C, Yang X, Lin J, Yang Q. Mitophagy in TGEV infection counteracts oxidative stress and apoptosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7:27122–27141. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dalle-Donne I, Giustarini D, Rossi R, Colombo R, Milzani A. Reversible S-glutathionylation of Cys 374 regulates actin filament formation by inducing structural changes in the actin molecule. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003;34:23–32. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Al-Mehdi AB, et al. Perinuclear mitochondrial clustering creates an oxidant-rich nuclear domain required for hypoxia-induced transcription. Sci. Signal. 2012;5:ra47. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Narasimha, A. M., et al. Cyclin D activates the Rb tumor suppressor by mono-phosphorylation. eLife3(2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Shtutman M, et al. The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:5522–5527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Valenta T, Hausmann G, Basler K. The many faces and functions of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 2012;31:2714–2736. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Powell SN, Kachnic LA. Roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in homologous recombination, DNA replication fidelity and the cellular response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene. 2003;22:5784–5791. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brenneman MA, Weiss AE, Nickoloff JA, Chen DJ. XRCC3 is required for efficient repair of chromosome breaks by homologous recombination. Mutat. Res. 2000;459:89–97. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8777(00)00002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Orthwein A, et al. A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells. Nature. 2015;528:422–426. doi: 10.1038/nature16142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mao Z, Bozzella M, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. Comparison of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination in human cells. DNA Repair. (Amst.). 2008;7:1765–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Deriano L, et al. Human chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells can escape DNA damage-induced apoptosis through the nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway. Blood. 2005;105:4776–4783. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sak A, et al. Selective inactivation of DNA-dependent protein kinase with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides: consequences for the rejoining of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitivity of human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6621–6624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jin W, et al. Estrogen receptor (ER) beta or p53 attenuates ERalpha-mediated transcriptional activation on the BRCA2 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:29671–29680. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802785200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Di LJ, Fernandez AG, De Siervi A, Longo DL, Gardner K. Transcriptional regulation of BRCA1 expression by a metabolic switch. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010;17:1406–1413. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fluckiger AC, et al. Cell cycle features of primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:547–556. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kageyama R, Masamizu Y, Niwa Y. Oscillator mechanism of Notch pathway in the segmentation clock. Dev. Dyn. 2007;236:1403–1409. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hirota M, Kitagaki M, Itagaki H, Aiba S. Quantitative measurement of spliced XBP1 mRNA as an indicator of endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2006;31:149–156. doi: 10.2131/jts.31.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vega S, et al. Snail blocks the cell cycle and confers resistance to cell death. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1131–1143. doi: 10.1101/gad.294104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bernard F, Krejci A, Housden B, Adryan B, Bray SJ. Specificity of Notch pathway activation: twist controls the transcriptional output in adult muscle progenitors. Development. 2010;137:2633–2642. doi: 10.1242/dev.053181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Niessen K, et al. Slug is a direct Notch target required for initiation of cardiac cushion cellularization. J. Cell. Biol. 2008;182:315–325. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bodgi L, et al. Mathematical models of radiation action on living cells: From the target theory to the modern approaches. A historical and critical review. J. Theor. Biol. 2016;394:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Le MT, et al. MicroRNA-125b is a novel negative regulator of p53. Genes Dev. 2009;23:862–876. doi: 10.1101/gad.1767609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hu Wenwei, Chan Chang S., Wu Rui, Zhang Cen, Sun Yvonne, Song Jun S., Tang Laura H., Levine Arnold J., Feng Zhaohui. Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504. Molecular Cell. 2010;38(5):689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lytle JR, Yario TA, Steitz JA. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5’ UTR as in the 3’ UTR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:9667–9672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703820104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hinz JM, Helleday T, Meuth M. Reduced apoptotic response to camptothecin in CHO cells deficient in XRCC3. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:249–253. doi: 10.1093/carcin/24.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in mammalian development and differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:823–830. doi: 10.1038/ncb0910-823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stitzel ML, Seydoux G. Regulation of the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Science. 2007;316:407–408. doi: 10.1126/science.1138236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wu Y, et al. Autophagy and mTORC1 regulate the stochastic phase of somatic cell reprogramming. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:715–725. doi: 10.1038/ncb3172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schweers RL, et al. NIX is required for programmed mitochondrial clearance during reticulocyte maturation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:19500–19505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708818104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Murrow L, Debnath J. Autophagy as a stress-response and quality-control mechanism: implications for cell injury and human disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2013;8:105–137. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020712-163918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sui X, et al. Autophagy and chemotherapy resistance: a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e838. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chaachouay H, et al. Autophagy contributes to resistance of tumor cells to ionizing radiation. Radiother. Oncol. 2011;99:287–292. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hudis CA, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need. Oncologist. 2011;16(Suppl 1):1–11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-S1-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kim CH, Park SJ, Lee SH. A targeted inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase sensitizes breast cancer cells following ionizing radiation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002;303:753–759. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.038505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.van den Hoff MJ, Moorman AF, Lamers WH. Electroporation in ‘intracellular’ buffer increases cell survival. Nucl. Acids Res. 1992;20:2902. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.11.2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci. Lett. 2003;339:62–66. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01423-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucl. Acids Res. 2001;29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen C, et al. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucl. Acids Res. 2005;33:e179. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gerdes J, et al. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J. Immunol. 1984;133:1710–1715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gerdes J, et al. Immunobiochemical and molecular biologic characterization of the cell proliferation-associated nuclear antigen that is defined by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Am. J. Pathol. 1991;138:867–873. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Panwar B, Omenn GS, Guan Y. miRmine: a database of human miRNA expression profiles. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1554–1560. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.