Early Suppression of Macrophage Gene Expression by Leishmania braziliensis

Abstract

Leishmania braziliensis is an intracellular parasite that resides mostly in macrophages. Both the parasite genome and the clinical disease manifestations show considerable polymorphism. Clinical syndromes caused by L. braziliensis include localized cutaneous (CL), mucosal (ML), and disseminated leishmaniasis (DL). Our prior studies showed that genetically distinct L. braziliensis clades associate with different clinical types. Herein, we hypothesized that: (1) L. braziliensis induces changes in macrophage gene expression that facilitates infection; (2) infection of macrophages with strains associated with CL (clade B), ML (clade C), or DL (clade A) will differentially affect host cell gene expression, reflecting their different pathogenic mechanisms; and (3) differences between the strains will be reflected by differences in macrophage gene expression after initial exposure to the parasite. Human monocyte derived macrophages were infected with L. braziliensis isolates from clades A, B, or C. Patterns of gene expression were compared using Affymetrix DNA microarrays. Many transcripts were significantly decreased by infection with all isolates. The most dramatically decreased transcripts encoded proteins involved in signaling pathways, apoptosis, or mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Some transcripts encoding stress response proteins were up-regulated. Differences between L. braziliensis clades were observed in the magnitude of change, rather than the identity of transcripts. Isolates from subjects with metastatic disease (ML and DL) induced a greater magnitude of change than isolates from CL. We conclude that L. braziliensis enhances its intracellular survival by inhibiting macrophage pathways leading to microbicidal activity. Parasite strains destined for dissemination may exert a more profound suppression than less invasive L. braziliensis strains that remain near the cutaneous site of inoculation.

Introduction

Leishmaniasis refers to a spectrum of human diseases caused by protozoan parasites belonging to the genus Leishmania, subgenus either Leishmania or Viannia. All forms of leishmaniasis are initiated when the promastigote form of the parasite is introduced into the skin of a mammalian host during a sand fly bite, after which they enter local phagocytic cells. Thereafter, parasites convert to their intracellular amastigote form and reside intracellularly. Most parasites reside in host macrophages throughout chronic infection. Amastigotes multiply and spread to new phagocytes, disseminating through host tissues in a pattern dictated primarily by the particular species of the organism. Productive infections may be either asymptomatic, or lead to different clinical syndromes involving internal organs, skin and/or mucosal surfaces (Azulay and Azulay Junior, 1995; Murray et al., 2005).

Leishmania braziliensis, a member of the Leishmania and Viannia sub-genus, is prevalent in Latin America. L. braziliensis causes at least three clinical types of tegumentary disease: localized cutaneous (CL), mucosal (ML), and disseminated leishmaniasis (DL) (Costa et al., 1986; Carvalho et al., 1994; Azulay and Azulay Junior, 1995; Bacellar et al., 2002; Turetz et al., 2002; Murray et al., 2005). The most striking feature differentiating CL from either ML or DL is the degree of metastasis of the microorganism, with consequent disease manifestations limited to or distant from the original inoculation site. Localized cutaneous leishmaniasis causes ulcerated lesions restricted to the parasite entry site in the skin, whereas ML is defined by spread of lesions to non-adjacent mucosal surfaces of upper digestive and airways tracts. DL is characterized by parasite dissemination causing lesions throughout skin sites of the infected patient (Machado et al., 2011).

Individuals living in the region of Corte de Pedra in the state of Bahia, Northeast Brazil, can be afflicted with any of the above three phenotypes of L. braziliensis disease.

With the current study we want to follow up our prior observation that L. braziliensis isolates derived from individuals with different clinical syndromes can be distinguished by polymorphic markers in the L. braziliensis genome, and these markers distinguish separate clades of L. braziliensis (Schriefer et al., 2004; Queiroz et al., 2012; Guimaraes et al., 2016). We have used this information to track parasite isolates during their movement through time and geographic parts of endemic areas (Schriefer et al., 2004, 2009). The goal of the current study was to discern whether these genotypic differences lead to detectable differences in host macrophage responses. Because the earliest responses seem to be critical in leishmaniasis, we used a model that would be most relevant to initial infection of a naïve host with L. braziliensis. Three clades corresponding to each of the predominant forms of tegumentary leishmaniasis in the region were studied. Specifically, clade A contains primarily isolates from individuals with DL, clade B contains isolates from CL subjects, and isolates from individuals with ML are concentrated in clade C (Schriefer et al., 2004).

Successful infection and ultimate dissemination of microorganisms throughout the host likely depends, in part, on the very early parasite–host cell interactions. Other studies have documented different patterns of gene expression in host macrophages after phagocytosis of different Leishmania species (Chaussabel et al., 2003; Ettinger and Wilson, 2008). Due to the severity and the diverse clinical forms of disease caused by L. braziliensis, we hypothesized that macrophage responses to the Leishmania subgenus Viannia braziliensis might be unique, and that these responses may differ between infections initiated by the distinct clades of L. braziliensis. The purpose of the current study, therefore, was to characterize and compare the initial changes in macrophage gene expression after phagocytosis of the three distinct L. braziliensis isolates from the three different clades. Similar to other investigators, we chose to focus on changes that occur at the earliest steps of infection based on the assumption that the patterns of gene expression at the very onset of infection initiate the environment that locally lead to the immunopathologic changes that occur later in disease.

Materials and Methods

Parasites

Leishmania braziliensis isolates were originally derived from individuals with CL, ML, or DL diagnosed in the medical clinic in Corte de Pedra, Bahia, Brazil. The three types of leishmaniasis were defined are as follows. Localized cutaneous leishmaniasis consisted of an ulcerated skin lesion at a single body site with no more than two secondary or satellite lesions, without clinical evidence of mucosal involvement. Mucosal leishmaniasis was defined as the presence of an inflamed or ulcerated mucosal lesion at a site that was non-contiguous with any cutaneous lesion. ML most frequently involved the nasal septum, oropharyngeal cavity, and/or larynx. Disseminated leishmaniasis was defined as 10 or more skin lesions of mixed type (acneiform, papular, nodular, and/or ulcerated) located in two or more body parts (head, trunk, arms, and legs). A diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis was made by isolation of parasites in culture from an aspirate or biopsy of a cutaneous or mucosal lesion. Additionally, all patients had a positive delayed hypersensitivity skin response to leishmania antigen (Montenegro Test).

Leishmania braziliensis isolates used in the present study were cultured from aspirates of lesion borders suspended in liver infusion tryptose/Novy, McNeal, Nicolle (LIT/NNN) medium then expanded in Schneider’s medium complemented with 10% heat inactivated fetal calf serum and 2 mM L-glutamine. Species determination was based upon HSP-70 PCR-RFLP (Garcia et al., 2004; Montalvo et al., 2010) and confirmed by real time PCR (Weirather et al., 2011). Parasites were frozen in 10% DMSO, 90% growth medium in liquid nitrogen and thawed prior to macrophage infection studies. All studies were conducted with parasites in stationary phase of growth.

Human Studies Approvals

Studies were approved by Institutional Review Boards of the Federal University of Bahia (document of approval: CAAE– 3041.0.000.054.07) and The University of Iowa. Study subjects were healthy adults over age 18, and written consent was obtained from all of them.

Macrophages and Macrophage Infections

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from normal healthy male volunteers from Salvador, Brazil, who resided outside of regions endemic for L. braziliensis infection. Monocytes were separated from peripheral blood by Ficoll hypaque density sedimentation, and adherence to plastic. Cells were maintained in Teflon vials in 20% autologous serum, 2 mM L-glutamine in RPMI 1640 with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (reagents from GIBCO). After a 5 days culture at 37°C and 5% CO₂, differentiated monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) were suspended in 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), 2 mM L-glutamine in RPMI 1640 with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco/ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, United States) [RP-10] and allowed to adhere to glass coverslips for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO₂. Non-adherent cells were removed by rinsing, then adherent MDMs were incubated overnight in RP-10 at 37°C, 5% CO₂.

Monocyte-derived macrophages from each of four donors were incubated in RP-10 with stationary phase L. braziliensis promastigotes from each of the three clades at a 2:1 parasite:MDM ratio. Incubations were synchronized by centrifugation at 60 ×g for 4 min at 4°C, and transferred to 37°C, 5% CO₂. The synchronization step greatly enhances the efficiency of parasite infection, enabling experiments to achieve infection of a majority of MDMs on the coverslip (Rodriguez et al., 2004). Control MDMs were treated in parallel but parasites were not added. After 1 h, free parasites were removed by rinsing and the RP-10 cultures were returned to 37°C, 5% CO₂ for an additional 3 h.

Duplicate coverslips from MDM-parasite co-cultures were removed, fixed in methanol and stained with Wright Giemsa (Diff Quik Hema 3, Fisher Scientific) to document the parasite loads. From the remaining samples, total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). RNA was treated with DNaseI and purified with Qiagen RNeasy mini-kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNA quality was checked with the Agilent Model 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, United States). The numbers of MDMs with internalized parasites were quantified microscopically. Sets of samples from a single donor in which all three infected conditions contained at least 80% of the macrophages with intracellular parasites, and in which all four conditions generated highly pure RNA, were chosen for microarrays.

Microarrays

cDNA was generated from 50 ng of total RNA and amplified with SPIA, a small sample PCR-based isothermal amplification method, using the Ovation Pico RNA Amplification System, v2 (NuGEN Technologies, Cat. #3100) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amplified SPIA cDNA product was purified through a QIAGEN QIAquick PCR Purification column (QIAGEN Cat #28104), according to modifications from NuGEN, then 3.75 μg of this product were fragmented (average fragment size = 85 bases) and biotin labeled using the NuGEN FL-Ovation cDNA Biotin Module, v2 (NuGEN Technologies, Cat. #4200) per the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting biotin-labeled cDNA was hybridized to the Human U133+2.0 arrays (Cat #900470) at 45°C for 18 h. Arrays were washed and subject to secondary labeling with fluorescent probes per the Affymetrix protocols. Arrays and associated procedures were performed at The University of Iowa DNA Core facility.

After quality assessment using affyQCReport (Gautier et al., 2004), data were imported into Partek (PartekGS, St. Louis, MO, United States) and normalized using gcRMA (Irizarry et al., 2003). Arrays were compared by both ANOVA and paired t-test models, using the Partek batch correction feature to correct for the different hybridization sets. Significance was assessed based on p-value with step-up FDR multiple testing correction and fold change cutoffs. Identification of cellular pathways possibly affected in macrophages by infection with parasites was carried out using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, QIAGEN). All transcript abundance results consist in the positive or negative fold change (i.e., ratio) in the expression of the genes in infected as compared to non-infected MDMs.

The affymetrics DNA micro array chip includes internal controls of base line gene expression across samples, that include GAPDH and β-actin, besides a number of internal positive and negative controls at the edges of the chip. This allows the ‘affyQCReport’ software tool to assess basal gene expression level within and between chips, using the GAPDH/β-actin expression ratios, and to evaluate the uniformity of test cDNA hybridization, and thus the expression reading throughout the entire chip area. Only those experiments that passed these tests were further analyzed in this study.

Validation of Selected Changes in Gene Expression

Transcripts selected for validation were significantly expressed in all samples, and changes in gene expression were statistically significant considering all four replicate samples in microarrays by ANOVA. Changes in expression observed on microarrays were validated by reverse transcriptase followed by qPCR to document gene expression in RNA samples from replicate MDM samples incubated without or with the representatives of L. braziliensis clades. cDNA was generated using the Superscript III First Strand Synthesis System kit (Invitrogen/ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, United States) and random hexamers, followed by RNase H treatment according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Taqman and primer pairs for qPCR were purchased from Applied Biosciences, Inc. (ABI, Foster City, CA, United States). Data were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method (Tricarico et al., 2002).

Statistical Analyses Other Than Microarrays

Differences in the percent of macrophages infected, or in the numbers of intracellular parasites per infected macrophage between the clades were compared using chi-square or one-way ANOVA, respectively. RT-qPCR expression data were analyzed for significant changes between donors using ANOVA. Changes in expression of individual transcripts were tested for significance by paired t-test. Comparisons of gene expression profiles between clades employed Friedman’s and paired one-tailed Wilcoxon tests. For experiments other than microarrays, comparisons were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with either Partek or Prism GraphPad software.

Results

MDM Infections

Peripheral blood monocyte derived macrophages from four human donors were incubated in vitro with medium alone, or with each of three strains of L. braziliensis representative of clades A, B, or C under conditions promoting parasite phagocytosis. The three parasite strains used for all infections included one derived from an individual with CL (clade B), one from an individual with ML (clade C) and one from a subject with DL (clade A). Considering our prior observation that the 4 h time was optimal for microarray studies using L. infantum (Ettinger and Wilson, 2008), we chose the 4 h time point to compare responses to different strains of L. braziliensis. Figure 1 shows that a large proportion of the MDMs contained intracellular parasites (Figure 1A; clade A 83 ± 5%, clade B 81 ± 8%, clade C 81 ± 7%, mean ± SD), with a mean of 5 parasites in each cell (Figure 1B; clade A 5.0 ± 0.6, clade B 5.6 ± 1.1, clade C 5.3 ± 1.4, mean ± SD). Neither the percent of MDMs infected nor the number of intracellular parasites per macrophage differed statistically between donors or between parasite clades within each donor (chi-square and one-way ANOVA, respectively).

FIGURE 1.

Parasite loads in infected MDMs used for microarrays. (A) The percentage of macrophages infected at a 2:1 (parasite:macrophage) ratio for 4 h with each isolate of Leishmania braziliensis from clades A, B, or C was quantified microscopically in four replicated donors (chi-square, p > 0.05). (B) Mean number of intracellular L. braziliensis parasites per infected macrophage in A (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). (C) Kinetics of the proportion of macrophages infected with isolates of L. braziliensis from clades A or B in four replicated donors, at a 2:1 (parasite:macrophage) ratio for 30 min to 48 h (chi-square from 4 to 48 h data points, p > 0.05). (D) Kinetics of the mean number of intracellular L. braziliensis parasites per infected macrophage in C (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Pearson’s correlation, R²= 0.93, p = 0.037, for data combined between clades A and B parasites represented in the figure versus time post-infection). Data show mean ± SE after quantifying at least 400 macrophages per condition in MDMs from each donor.

We then checked changes in levels of MDM infections overtime. The proportion of MDM infected with L. braziliensis peaked at 4 h and remained constant up to 48 h, when last assessed (Figure 1C; chi-square, p > 0.05). However, the numbers of parasites per infected MDM continuously increased throughout the kinetics experiment (Figure 1D; one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05; Pearson’s correlation, R²= 0.93, p = 0.037, for data combined between clades A and B parasites represented in the figure versus time post-infection).

Global Changes in Gene Expression Among Infected MDM

All transcripts that were significantly expressed in infected MDMs were considered in our analyses. Data were first analyzed within each donor for the change in expression between the infected versus the uninfected MDM conditions for each clade. Transcripts that were statistically significantly changed considering all four donors were determined using ANOVA with FDR multiple testing correction. Changes in gene expression induced by the three different clades in all four donors were compared using ANOVA. All transcripts noted in this report were selected because of a significance level of at least p < 0.0001. Most changes were at least twofold (i.e., Log₂ = 1.0), with exceptions noted in specific instances.

Most transcripts were unchanged by infection, as expected. Examples of transcripts encoding proteins relevant to cellular functions that did not change in macrophages infected with any of the three clades included MTCH2 (mitochondrial carrier 2; overall p = 0.9562), TLL5 (tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 5; overall p = 0.9556) and PLOD2 (procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 2; overall p = 0.9552) amongst many others.

More than 500 expressed transcripts were significantly changed to the p < 0.0001 level upon infection with any of the three strains of L. braziliensis. A comprehensive list of transcripts that changed and met the above significance criteria can be found in the Supplementary Table 1. Among the 576 altered transcripts, 487 were altered in macrophages infected with clade A, 156 in macrophages infected with clade B and 318 in macrophages infected with clade C. Considering all the transcripts whose abundance changed by the significance criteria, 471 transcripts were down-regulated whereas 89 were up-regulated. Significantly altered transcripts were classified according to functional pathways. The host processes affected by L. braziliensis phagocytosis distributed into four main categories: signal propagation, mitochondrial function, apoptosis, and response to external environment. The predominant pathways and genes whose expression was altered by L. braziliensis infection, and the changes in expression for each clade, are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Examples of human monocyte derived macrophage genes whose expression was significantly changed by infection with L. braziliensis belonging to clades A, B, or C from Corte de Pedra (Statistical analyses by one-way ANOVA).

Functional group	Gene	p-Value			Log2 change in expression relative to uninfected MDMs			Gene description
		A	B	C	Clade
					A	B	C
Decreased expression
Signal propagation
Surface receptors	TLR8	9.15004e-005	0.0017291	8.18538e-005	-2.5	-1.9	-2.5	Toll-like receptor 8
	IL-12RB1	5.44261e-005	0.000572767	0.00147462	-1.8	-1.5	-1.5	Interleukin 12 receptor, beta one subunit
	IL-15RA	2.01434e-005	0.000597875	0.000135149	-2.2	-1.7	-1.9	Interleukin 15 receptor, alpha subunit
Signal transduction	MYD88	3.33232e-005	0.000460159	0.000161814	-1.7	-1.5	-1.6	Myeloid differentiation primary response (88); Activates NF-kB
	PELI1	0.000140615	0.00015842	4.70314e-005	-1.9	-1.9	-2.1	Pellino-related intracellular-signaling molecule; Activates NF-kB
	ECT2	6.22083e-005	0.000954735	0.00019954	-2.6	-2.0	-2.3	Epithelial cell transfer sequence 2 oncogene; Activates NF-kB
	VISA	0.000291381	4.07134e-005	0.000187217	-1.7	-2.0	-1.8	Virus-induced signaling adapter; Activates NF-kB
	NOD2	3.23249e-005	9.92379e-006	1.90858e-005	-2.4	-2.7	-2.5	Nuclear-binding oligomerization domain contining 2; Activates NF-kB
	STAT1	6.06884e-005	0.00179476	3.96141e-005	-1.4	-1.2	-1.4	Signal transduction and activation of transcription 1 JAK-STAT pathway
	STAT5A	3.97644e-005	0.00148146	0.000634802	-1.6	-1.4	-1.4	Signal transduction and activation of transcription 5 JAK-STAT pathway
	TYK2	2.32594e-005	0.000160678	3.71196e-005	-1.8	-1.6	-1.7	Non-receptor member of JAK family; JAK-STAT pathway
	JAK2	2.8929e-005	6.75267e-005	1.48982e-005	-2.2	-2.1	-2.4	Janus kinase 2; JAK-STAT pathway
	MAP2K5	0.00868219	0.000126235	9.53199e-006	-1.2	-1.5	-1.7	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5; MAPK pathway
	MAP2K3	6.23796e-005	0.000128993	6.32058e-005	-1.9	-1.8	-1.9	Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3; MAPK pathway
	ICK	7.68298e-005	0.000600357	3.15881e-005	-2.3	-1.9	-2.5	Intestinal cell (MAK-like) kinase; Possibly MAPK pathway
	TRAF7	2.50164e-005	0.000317723	0.0002048	-1.4	-1.3	-1.3	TNF receptor-associated factor 7; MKKK of MAPK pathway
	PLCB2	1.7885e-005	5.43495e-005	3.08817e-006	-1.7	-1.6	-1.9	Phospholipase C, beta 2 chain; Activates Phospholipase C
	CAMKK2	8.90843e-006	0.000102443	1.61629e-005	-1.9	-1.6	-1.8	Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2
	MFNG	4.41145e-005	0.00259564	0.00011307	-1.9	-1.5	-1.8	Manic fringe; Notch signaling pathway
Transcriptional regulators	TRERF1	4.08183e-005	0.00106701	0.000153032	-1.9	-1.6	-1.5	Transcriptional regulator
Nuclear pore function	XPO6	7.73493e-005	0.000158596	3.54427e-005	-1.5	-1.5	-1.6	Exportin 6; nuclear pore protein transporter
	RANBP10	2.96201e-005	0.000235132	0.000147206	-2.0	-1.7	-1.8	RAN binding prot 10; nuclear pore transport
	NUP62	4.25576e-005	0.000737207	0.000128261	-1.4	-1.3	-1.4	Nucleoporin 62 kDa
	NUP93	6.71235e-005	0.00070184	0.000213948	-1.6	-1.4	-1.5	Nucleoporin 93 kDa
	NUP214	1.07315e-005	0.00204607	0.00011174	-1.8	-1.3	-1.6	Nucleoporin 214 kDa
Mitochondrial function
Electron transport	ISCU	5.90789e-006	4.1835e-005	1.09868e-005	-1.5	-1.4	-1.5	Iron–sulfur cluster scaffold homolog
	ISCA2	1.49189e-005	0.000379011	2.9555e-005	-2.4	-1.8	-2.3	Iron–sulfur cluster assembly 2 homolog
	NDUFA11	1.61998e-005	0.000285867	7.42091e-006	-1.4	-1.3	-1.4	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFC1	3.5465e-005	0.000959163	4.37207e-005	-1.4	-1.3	-1.4	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFB10	9.64108e-006	0.000432758	5.43291e-005	-1.5	-1.3	-1.4	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFV3	4.55964e-006	0.000170585	1.11309e-005	-1.8	-1.5	-1.7	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFS3	3.86571e-007	1.31216e-005	8.56046e-007	-1.6	-1.4	-1.5	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFS2	3.55512e-005	0.000983593	0.000288838	-1.7	-1.4	-1.5	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	NDUFB8	8.34828e-005	0.000590415	0.0012524	-1.3	-1.2	-1.2	NADH dehydrogenase subunit, mitochondrial encoded
	TFAM	3.42623e-005	0.00349217	8.02956e-005	-1.5	-1.3	-1.5	Transcription factor A, mitochondrial; encoded in the nucleus
Mitochondrial protein	MRPS14	8.24489e-005	0.000132693	0.000467884	-2.3	-2.2	-2.0	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S14; encoded in the nucleus
synthesis	MRPS35	1.0742e-005	0.00014928	1.28405e-005	-1.5	-1.4	-1.5	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S35; encoded in the nucleus
	MRPL16	2.17496e-005	0.000230342	8.89629e-005	-2.0	-1.7	-1.8	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L16; encoded in the nucleus
	MRPL19	0.000265737	0.00231705	7.0312e-005	-1.8	-1.5	-1.9	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L19; encoded in the nucleus
	MRPL41	4.5838e-005	0.00148749	0.000301997	-1.7	-1.4	-1.5	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L41; encoded in the nucleus
	MRPL52	7.55371e-005	0.00318154	0.00012328	-1.5	-1.3	-1.5	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L52; encoded in the nucleus
	MRP63	8.37002e-005	0.00353342	0.000356301	-1.6	-1.4	-1.5	Mitochondrial ribosomal protein 63; encoded in the nucleus
	PDHB	8.56049e-005	0.00209902	0.000120183	-1.8	-1.5	-1.7	Pyruvate dehydrogenase (lipoamide) beta
Apoptosis
	TP53	0.000833372	0.0018592	7.78129e-005	-1.5	-1.5	-1.8	Tumor protein p53; Tumor suppressor
	MAPK14	2.07957e-005	0.000172754	5.78548e-005	-1.7	-1.5	-1.6	Phosphorylates and activates TP53
	FRAP1	7.21564e-005	0.000895603	0.000148447	-2.2	-1.8	-2.0	Phosphorylates and activates TP53
	YPEL3	1.10105e-005	0.000141583	2.17379e-005	-2.9	-2.2	-2.7	Tumor suppressor directly induced by TP53
	MRPL41	4.5838e-005	0.00148749	0.000301997	-1.7	-1.4	-1.5	TP53 translocation to mitochondrion
Parkinson’s disease
	LRRK2	0.000111713	0.00051427	7.7878e-005	-3.9	-3.1	-4.1	PARK8; Induces apoptosis; Interacts with PARKIN and DJ-1
	DJ-1	8.46957e-006	0.0013984	0.000116928	-1.3	-1.2	-1.2	PARK7; Redox-sensitive chaperone and sensor of oxidative stress
	NUB1	0.000155931	0.000373989	6.53521e-005	-1.7	-1.6	-1.7	Negative regulator of ubiquitin-like proteins 1; Part of Lewy bodies
Increased expression
Transcriptional regulation	HIC1	5.26337e-005	0.000501033	0.00023281	3.6	2.7	2.9	Transcription repressor Hypermethylated in Cancer 1
Apoptosis	ETS2	4.80848e-005	0.000607089	0.000184372	2.4	1.9	2.1	Probably transcriptional activator of TP53
Proteasomal degradation
	UBC	7.4032e-005	0.00237149	0.000111829	1.2	1.1	1.2	Ubiquitin C; proteasome
	UBAP1	3.48504e-005	0.000293469	0.000225023	1.5	1.4	1.4	Ubiquitin associated protein 1 target ubiquitinilation
	SPSB1	7.87991e-005	0.000339641	0.000157297	2.4	2.1	2.2	Substrate recognition-E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase complex
	KLHL21	5.79205e-005	0.000134488	3.97511e-005	1.7	1.6	1.7	Kelch-like 21; Adapter of an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase complex
	USP12	9.3778e-005	0.000972177	0.000104449	1.6	1.4	1.5	Ubiquitin specific peptidase 12; Deubiquitinating enzyme
Environmental response
Metal binding	MT1M	9.05665e-005	0.000215829	2.07091e-005	7.6	6.3	11.0	Metallothionein 1M
	MT1X	0.000232234	0.000598304	5.30768e-005	2.7	2.4	3.2	Metallothionein 1X
	MT1F	0.000211204	0.000573519	4.83875e-005	2.6	2.4	3.2	Metallothionein 1F
	MT1E	8.88948e-006	2.39768e-005	2.1035e-006	3.4	3.0	4.2	Metallothionein 1E
	MT1G	1.43444e-006	6.48199e-006	4.16245e-007	2.7	2.4	3.1	Metallothionein 1G
	MT1H	1.17455e-005	4.00175e-005	3.2461e-006	2.7	2.4	3.1	Metallothionein 1H
Antioxidant response	TXNRD1	5.75177e-006	6.15629e-006	2.27237e-006	1.3	1.3	1.4	Thioredoxin reductase 1
Stress response	HSPA1A	7.71182e-005	0.000256787	5.82824e-005	5.8	4.6	6.1	Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A

Down-Regulated MDM Transcripts

The overwhelming majority (84.2%) of transcripts that were significantly altered by infection with any of the three L. braziliensis clades were repressed (Figure 2). Selected noteworthy transcripts, and p-values for each listed transcript (ANOVA), are displayed in Table 1. Genes belonging to three of the four categories mentioned above were predominantly down-regulated. The category with the largest number of significantly down-regulated transcripts encoded components of cellular signaling pathways. These included mRNAs encoding cell surface receptors, signal transduction proteins and one transcriptional regulator. Transcripts encoding nuclear permeability factors were also diminished.

FIGURE 2.

Global changes in infected MDM gene expression. MDMs from four healthy human donors were infected at a 2:1 (parasite:MDM) ratio with each of three isolates of L. braziliensis from clades A, B, or C (Schriefer et al., 2004). The clades A, B, and C isolates were drawn from patients with DL, CL, and ML, respectively. After 4 h, total RNA was extracted and processed for hybridization to Affymetrix human transcript microarrays. Fold changes were calculated by comparing fluorescence data representing the abundance of each transcript in infected versus uninfected MDMs from the same donor. Each dot in the figure represents the average fold change in abundance of each transcript in all four donors. Eighty-nine transcripts were significantly increased, and 471 transcripts were significantly decreased after MDM infection with each of the three L. braziliensis isolates (one-way ANOVA for repressed transcripts among MDM infected with clades A, B, or C, p < 0.0001).

The most highly repressed transcript encoding a cell surface receptor was Toll-like receptor 8, the receptor that senses single stranded RNA within the host cell. Also affected was the transcript for MyD88, a binding protein necessary for function of many TLRs, including TLR8 (Kenny and O’Neill, 2008). Transcripts encoding cytokine receptors or signaling intermediates in cytokine-initiated cascades that were down-modulated included subunits of receptors for IL-12 (IL12Rβ1), IL15 (IL15Rα), and IL-10 (IL10Rβ). Proteins transducing signals from cytokine receptors were also down-regulated, most notably Jak2, STAT1, STAT5A, TYK2, and two MAP kinase kinases (MAP2K5 and MAP2K3). Both the TLR and Jak-STAT pathways can converge on the transcription factor NF-κB (Oeckinghaus et al., 2011); thus these modifications could result in diminished pro-inflammatory responses. Overall, forty transcripts encoding signaling intermediates or transcriptional regulators were significantly affected at a p < 0.0001 level, and 35 of these (87.5%) were down-regulated. Surprisingly, transcripts encoding components of nuclear pores were also down-modulated by L. braziliensis infection, including two transcripts encoding Ran binding proteins (nuclear exportin 6, XPO6; and RBP10) and three nucleoporins (NUP62, NUP93, and NUP214).

Several transcripts encoding proteins that function in the mitochondrion were significantly decreased. These included proteins important for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. The down-modulated nuclear-encoded proteins ISCU and ISCA2 are two of the three peptides that are translocated into the mitochondrion to serve as scaffold proteins for the biogenesis of iron–sulfur clusters (Rouault and Tong, 2005). These clusters are involved in electron transfer chains of both Complex I and Complex II during oxidative phosphorylation. In addition to the above, expression of all seven mitochondrially-encoded subunits of the NADH dehydrogenase constituting Complex I were significantly suppressed, possibly decreasing essential components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Andreyev et al., 2005). Transcripts encoding additional proteins responsible for mitochondrial protein synthesis were also suppressed, including one of two subunits of the major mitochondrial transcription factor TFAM and seven mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MPRS 14, 35; MPRL 16, 19, 41, 52; MRP 63). Complex I and other mitochondrial proteins are essential for translocating protons across the mitochondrial inner membrane and generating the electrochemical potential gradient necessary for ATP production, generation of reactive oxygen species, and promoting apoptosis (Chomova and Racay, 2010). Thus, the above observations could have implications for macrophage programmed cell death, as well as cellular metabolic activity.

Other transcripts involved in the intrinsic apoptosis pathway (Jin and El-Deiry, 2005) that were suppressed by L. braziliensis exposure included TP53, which encodes tumor protein 53 or p53, and LRRK2, the major late-onset familial Parkinson’s disease associated gene [also called PARK 8 (Paisan-Ruiz et al., 2004; Zimprich et al., 2004)]. Expression of proteins that participate in p53 function were also decreased: MAPK14 and FRAP1 phosphorylate and activate p53; YPEL3 is induced by p53; MRPL41 stabilizes p53 and enhances its translocation into the mitochondrion (Kelley et al., 2010). LRRK2 (PARK 8) is hypothesized to play a role upstream of the MAPK pathway and to mediate both familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease by inducing intrinsic neuronal apoptosis (Zimprich et al., 2004; Healy et al., 2008; Lin et al., 2009). Other genes that associate with Parkinson’s disease that were also repressed were NUB1 which encodes a Lewy body protein, and DJ-1 (aka PARK7) whose product can bind LRRK2 and is associated with a recessive form of Parkinson’s disease (Bonifati, 2007).

Up-Regulated MDM Transcripts

Only 15.8% of transcripts significantly influenced by MDM infections were up-regulated (Figure 2 and Table 1). Noteworthy up-regulated transcripts include the negative regulator of transcription HIC1, and a transcription factor activating the apoptosis protein TP53, ETS2 (Venanzoni et al., 1996). It is possible that the latter was induced in response to down-regulated expression of TP53 itself. Many of the other up-regulated transcripts encoded genes involved in response to environment conditions, sometimes involved in the cellular response to stress. Similar to our prior report, transcripts encoding several metallothionein proteins were highly up-regulated (Ettinger and Wilson, 2008). Metallothioneins are important for metal chelation and regulating cellular content of zinc. Because of their high cysteine content, metallothioneins not only chelate metal ions, but in some situations they can play a protective role against oxidant toxicity (Namdarghanbari et al., 2011). The transcript for thioredoxin reductase was also increased, as was the transcript of the HSP70 family member HSPA1A. Several transcripts encoding proteins associated with ubiquitin targeting were increased, suggesting an increase in proteins acting as chaperones for misfolded or damaged proteins targeted for degradation in the proteasome (Wong and Cuervo, 2010).

Validation of Micro-Array Findings

Selected microarray findings were validated in two manners. First, amongst the transcripts that were significantly changed by L. braziliensis infection, some were chosen for validation using the original mRNAs employed in microarray hybridization. The transcripts were chosen to reflect a spectrum ranging from highly induced to highly repressed. Validation of mRNA changes was done by reverse transcriptase-qPCR. The mean fold changes according to each method are shown in Table 2. In all 30 conditions evaluated by RT-qPCR, the relative abundance of transcripts changed in the same direction as the microarray. Not surprisingly, there were differences in the magnitude of fold change between the two methods. Nonetheless the 10 transcripts fell into the same approximate rank order from highest to lowest fold change in expression, differing in order by 0–2 positions when aligned according to microarray versus RT-qPCR data.

Table 2.

Changes in expression of 10 transcripts in MDMs infected with L. braziliensis isolates belonging to each clades (A, B, or C) were documented in independent assays of gene expression in four MDM donors.

Transcript	Clade	Fold change
		Microarray (n = 4)	qPCR (n = 4)
MT1M	A	7.653	2.660
MT1M	B	6.269	2.405
MT1M	C	11.048	4.945
HSPA1A	A	5.763	4.869
HSPA1A	B	4.563	3.249
HSPA1A	C	6.101	4.414
MT1X	A	2.662	3.880
MT1X	B	2.384	2.898
MT1X	C	3.203	5.642
TXNRD1	A	1.337	1.524
TXNRD1	B	1.334	1.560
TXNRD1	C	1.377	1.855
UBC	A	1.179	1.444
UBC	B	1.111	1.283
UBC	C	1.170	1.351
DJ-1	A	0.406	0.843
DJ-1	B	0.435	0.949
DJ-1	C	0.435	0.985
TRERF1	A	0.268	0.453
TRERF1	B	0.330	0.486
TRERF1	C	0.354	0.574
IL-15RA	A	0.435	0.624
IL-15RA	B	0.536	0.541
IL-15RA	C	0.467	0.694
TLR8	A	0.178	0.435
TLR8	B	0.268	0.458
TLR8	C	0.178	0.482
LRRK2	A	0.067	0.537
LRRK2	B	0.117	0.553
LRRK2	C	0.058	0.482

Data show the mean (log₂)-fold induction of transcripts in infected relative to uninfected MDMs 4 h after parasite exposure. Results from the original DNA microarrays (3^rd column) are compared to new reverse transcriptase qPCR assays (4^th column). All changes from uninfected were statistically significant (microarray: see Table 1; qPCR results: p < 0.05 by paired t-test).

Second, beyond validation with original microarray samples, we tested whether there would be similar changes in gene expression in MDMs from additional human blood donors. Selected transcripts that were validated by RT-qPCR are shown in Figure 3, showing down-modulated transcripts in panels A through H, and up-regulated transcripts in panels I through L. Although some of the minimally changed did not reach significance compared to uninfected MDMs, the overall directions of changes were concordant between data from new donors and original microarray results.

FIGURE 3.

qPCR validation of changes in gene expression observed on microarrays. Validation performed using RNA samples of additional blood donors different than those included in microarray analysis shown in Figure 2. (A–H) Shows RT-qPCR of selected MDM transcripts whose expression was down-regulated, according to Affymetrix microarrays. (I–L) Shows RT-qPCR of selected MDM transcripts whose expression was up-regulated. Data consist in the average fold change elicited by each L. braziliensis clade representative relative to uninfected MDMs from the same donor.

MDM Transcripts Regulation According to Infection With L. braziliensis Clade

Transcripts of MDMs infected with L. braziliensis isolates belonging to each of the three different clades were regulated in the same general direction (induction/repression). However, the magnitude of change for many transcripts differed between the clades (Figure 4). Aggregate analysis of the MDM gene expression profiles, employing the built-in clustering capability of the Partek Genomics Suite (Partek, Inc., Chesterfield, MO, United States), was used to compare changes in gene expression induced by infection with parasite strains associated with metastatic diseases [clades A (DL), C (ML)] and with localized CL (clade B). As illustrated in Figure 4A, the overlap between transcripts significantly altered by infection with clades C and A was greater than the overlap between either clades C and B or clades A and B. The magnitude by which each of the parasite isolates suppressed the 471 down-modulated transcripts is plotted according to clade in Figure 4B. Although all changes were in the same direction, the plot illustrates that the magnitude of change was similar between isolates belonging to clades A and C, and both were more intense than changes induced by the clade B isolate. The difference between the suppressive effects of parasite isolates on gene expression was statistically significant (Figure 4B, Friedman’s test, p = 0.002; Figure 2, ANOVA, p < 0.0001).

FIGURE 4.

Gene expression profiles from the microarrays described and illustrated in Figure 2 were collated according to the number of significantly altered transcripts in MDM infected with isolates from each of the three representatives of L. braziliensis clades (A, B, or C). (A) Venn diagram of the distribution of transcripts with changes in expression that reached statistical significance upon infection of MDMs with each L. braziliensis parasite. Sectors indicate the numbers of transcripts that were uniquely changed due to infection with one parasite clade, or transcripts that were changed by infection with more than one parasite clade (evaluation of gene expression employed ANOVA for detecting transcripts significantly affected by infections, and paired Student’s t-test for comparing the expression elicited by clades of parasites in infected MDM). (B) The magnitude of change in expression of 471 genes in MDM infected with each of the three L. braziliensis isolates is illustrated. Values represent the fold changes in expression of the 471 genes for which transcript abundance was significantly decreased by infection with any of the three parasite isolates tested. L. braziliensis isolates belong to clade A (DL; blue), clade B (CL; green), or clade C (ML; red). Each position on the x-axis corresponds to a single gene, plotted against its fold change in expression on the y-axis (Friedman’s test p < 0.002 for pair-wise comparisons between MDM infected with different parasite clades).

We questioned whether additional parasite isolates belonging to clades A, B, or C would yield the same or different effects on macrophage gene expression. MDMs from eight new subjects were infected in parallel with nine L. braziliensis isolates, including three isolates from each of the three clades A, B, or C, respectively. The average fold changes in two of the most down-regulated transcripts (LRRK2 and TLR8) and two of the most up-regulated transcripts (HSPA1A and MT1M) were determined by RT-qPCR. In each case, the direction of fold change in MDMs from the new donors to a larger set of parasite isolates was similar to that observed in the original MDMs responding to the initial three parasite isolates (Figure 5). Furthermore, in each case the changes induced by clades A and C isolates were similar to each other, but different from changes induced by clade B (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

Changes in LRRK2, TLR8, HSPA1A, and MT1M expression were documented in independent assays of MDMs from eight additional human donors, distinct from those of experiments depicted in Figures 1–4. MDMs were infected with three representative L. braziliensis isolates of each clade (A, B, or C) used in microarray experiments. Data derived from total RNA extracted after 4 h of MDM infection at a MOI of two parasites per macrophage (2:1). The relative abundance of transcripts was assessed by RT-qPCR. p-Values correspond to pair-wise comparisons by one tailed paired Wilcoxon test.

Kinetics of Selected Transcripts in Infected MDM

We evaluated the duration of change in expression of twenty significantly affected MDM genes up to 48 h post-infection of MDM from eight different donors. The transcripts were chosen to reflect the range of expressions detected by the micro array experiments. These data, shown in Table 3, indicate that the changes in expression of the chosen transcripts peaked at either 4 or 24 h. Considering all transcripts and all time points tested, the following transcripts reached significance: IL10RB, MYD88H, TRERF1, PARK7, UBC, MT1M, NDUFA11, and NUP214. Biological relevance would require a secondary study of protein abundance, but these data lead us to conclude that the kinetics of gene expression is dynamic over the first 48 h after macrophage infection, and that at least some transcripts reaching signficance at 4 h remained elevated or suppressed at 24 h.

Table 3.

Expression kinetics of 21 transcripts significantly induced or repressed in human monocyte derived macrophages of eight donors after 4 h infection with an L. braziliensis isolate of a cutaneous leishmaniasis patient from Corte de Pedra, Brazil.

Transcript	4 h Mean (SE)	24 h Mean (SE)	48 h Mean (SE)	4 h × 24 h × 48 h p-value	4 h × 24 h p-value	4 h × 48 h p-value
LRRK2	0.44 (0.11)	0.64 (0.19)	0.30 (0.09)	0.2637	0.3751	0.3565
NUP214	0.55 (0.07)	1.17 (0.10)	0.86 (0.21)	0.0162*	0.0008***	0.1407
TRERF1	0.55 (0.11)	1.58 (0.40)	1.01 (0.27)	0.1443	0.0484*	0.1874
TP53	0.60 (0.10)	0.88 (0.15)	0.73 (0.19)	0.3708	0.1747	0.6276
IL10RB	0.60 (0.13)	1.18 (0.09)	0.53 (0.17)	0.0395*	0.0087**	0.8201
MAPK14	0.62 (0.12)	0.89 (0.21)	0.71 (0.17)	0.3497	0.2053	0.6732
TLR8	0.68 (0.15)	1.23 (0.29)	0.53 (0.18)	0.1667	0.2021	0.4237
NDUFA11	0.70 (0.08)	2.11 (0.57)	0.57 (0.19)	0.0490*	0.0430*	0.5232
PARK7	0.73 (0.05)	1.23 (0.07)	0.76 (0.19)	0.0304*	0.0001***	0.8683
XPO6	0.77 (0.10)	1.56 (0.47)	0.94 (0.30)	0.2905	0.1462	0.6111
MYD88H	0.85 (0.11)	1.64 (0.26)	0.68 (0.17)	0.0104*	0.0384*	0.4681
FRP1	0.86 (0.27)	1.61 (0.26)	0.94 (0.23)	0.1498	0.1212	0.8445
NUP93	1.02 (0.24)	1.06 (0.05)	0.98 (0.23)	0.9414	0.8573	0.9014
IL15RA	1.32 (0.40)	1.37 (0.28)	0.92 (0.22)	0.5385	0.9363	0.4214
NUB1	1.35 (0.37)	2.40 (0.56)	0.86 (0.27)	0.0929	0.2262	0.3887
UBC	1.39 (0.30)	3.27 (0.82)	0.77 (0.21)	0.0244*	0.0154*	0.1336
TXRND1	1.85 (0.28)	2.44 (0.68)	0.87 (0.25)	0.0621	0.3381	0.0730
MT1X	2.66 (0.69)	1.50 (0.30)	1.24 (0.41)	0.1087	0.1084	0.1095
MT1M	3.20 (0.71)	3.25 (1.04)	0.78 (0.29)	0.0214*	0.9564	0.0058**
HSPA1A	4.45 (2.14)	2.84 (0.90)	2.43 (1.44)	0.6523	0.5278	0.5245

Statistical comparisons of three time points were done by ANOVA; comparisons between two times utilized Student’s t-test. ^∗p < 0.05; ^∗∗p < 0.01; ^∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Discussion

Previous studies have directly or indirectly underscored the influences of both parasite and host on the clinical phenotypes of diseases caused by L. braziliensis (Kahl et al., 1991; Cabrera et al., 1995; Saravia et al., 1998, 2002; Schriefer et al., 2004, 2009; Castellucci et al., 2005, 2006; Salhi et al., 2008). In the present report, we tested whether the initial contact between human macrophages and genetically distinct L. braziliensis strains derived from individuals with different clinical forms of tegumentary leishmaniasis might lead to diverse gene expression patterns in the host macrophage. The L. braziliensis isolates we examined were chosen from representative individuals with either metastatic (disseminated or mucosal) forms of leishmaniasis, or localized (cutaneous) leishmaniasis. Each isolate had previously been typed as belonging to the three genetically distinct clades that correspond to the different forms of disease (A, C, or B, respectively) (Schriefer et al., 2004).

Remarkably, the parasites associated with the two forms of metastatic leishmaniasis (clades A and C) elicited changes in host macrophage gene expression that were more similar to each other than those induced by the isolate from a subject with localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (clade B). The differences primarily observed were in the magnitude of induction or repression of the affected transcripts, caused by the L. braziliensis from subjects with ML or DL as compared to the strain from a subject with CL.

Leishmania braziliensis infection down-regulated the expression of the majority of the significantly affected MDM transcripts. This is similar to the overall suppression of gene expression observed in other studies of murine and human macrophage infections with Leishmania spp. (Matlashewski and Buates, 2001; Chaussabel et al., 2003; Ettinger and Wilson, 2008; Gregory et al., 2008).

Prior work has suggested that there may be an overall suppression of pathways transducing signals from the extracellular environment in leishmania-infected macrophages. A report by Moore et al. was one of the earliest accounts indicating that Leishmania spp. infection of macrophages impairs the transmission of information from the macrophage surface to the nucleus (Moore et al., 1993). Subsequent reports showed that the initial contact between leishmania parasites and the host cell led to a transient activation of signaling mechanisms, but many signaling pathways are suppressed during established infection (Engwerda et al., 2004). Signaling through Jak/STAT and MAPK with resultant suppressed NF-κB activation are some of the most dramatically affected pathways (Junghae and Raynes, 2002; Bhardwaj et al., 2005; Forget et al., 2005; Ben-Othman et al., 2008; Calegari-Silva et al., 2009; Matte and Descoteaux, 2010). Changes leading to impaired regulatory mechanisms cited include protein phosphorylation state and targeting to the proteasome for degradation (Bhardwaj et al., 2005; Forget et al., 2005).

The current study also documents a general down-regulation of genes involved in transducing signals from TLRs or cytokines, all the way to the host cell nucleus. Taken together, these observations lead us to speculate that the changes in outside-inside signaling transcripts, primarily in a downward direction, creates an environment of anergy and paralyzes cellular functions just after host–cell invasion, which benefit the parasite.

Observations in the current study raise the hypothesis that infection with L. braziliensis may suppress or modify iron–sulfur clusters biogenesis and/or mitochondrial respiration. It remains to be seen whether subtle decreases in transcripts encoding components of Complex I is capable of affecting the generation of the electron potential at the mitochondrial inner membrane. Nonetheless evidence suggests that Complex I is involved in cellular apoptosis, and it is tempting to speculate that these changes might result in diminished mitochondrial signals leading to death of the infected cell. Indeed, the ability of Leishmania spp. infection to inhibit host cell apoptosis has long been recognized as a strategy promoting parasite persistence and survival (Moore and Matlashewski, 1994; Lisi et al., 2005; Ruhland et al., 2007).

Despite two reports showing that L. major infection of the murine RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line suppresses cytochrome c release from the mitochondrion, in part mediated by BCL-XL, preventing activation of caspases (Akarid et al., 2004; Donovan et al., 2009), our study did not reveal significant changes in expression of BCL-2 family members in human macrophages infected with L. braziliensis. However, transcripts encoding proteins involved in two major triggers of intrinsic pathway apoptosis were down-regulated. These were (1) TP53 and proteins that control its activation, stabilization, and translocation into the mitochondrion; and (2) LRRK2, which attaches to the mitochondrion and mediates apoptosis by a still poorly understood mechanism. Regarding LRRK2, SNPs in this gene are associated with the multibacillary form of human infection with Mycobacterium leprae (Zhang et al., 2009), another intracellular pathogen.

Leishmania braziliensis can lead to diverse manifestations in infected humans. CL can disseminate if left undiagnosed and untreated for an extended time period or when occurring in malnourished individuals. Disseminated forms of tegumentary leishmaniasis are also more common in individuals who harbor particular polymorphic risk-associated alleles compared to other genotypes (Llanos-Cuentas et al., 1984; Cabrera et al., 1995; Alcais et al., 1997; Turetz et al., 2002; Castellucci et al., 2005, 2006; Machado-Coelho et al., 2005; Salhi et al., 2008). Our prior reports suggested that genetic polymorphism of the parasite itself is also associated with the diversity of diseases caused by this parasite (Schriefer et al., 2004; Queiroz et al., 2012). The current report extends our understanding by showing that L. braziliensis strains belonging to distinct clades lead to subtle but consistently distinct behaviors upon interaction with human MDMs. The study leads to the hypothesis that prolonged macrophage survival due to a decrease in apoptosis, and a greater suppression of the responses to external stimuli may correspond to part of the mechanism that favor dissemination.

A practical limitation of this study was that full evaluation of the effects of parasite clade on global macrophage gene expression was performed with one representative of each major clade, using biological replicates to enable statistical evaluation. We were able to improve on this by doing validation with a larger set of strains per L. braziliensis clade, though validation was done on a limited number of transcripts. Although logistics did not allow us to examine a larger set of strains in this report, these data do lead us to relevant hypotheses that merit validation in further studies with a larger array of parasite lines from additional infected patients. Ongoing tests must be done before there will be ample comparisons leading to the mechanisms and consequences of host cell invasion by distinct groups of L. braziliensis isolates.

It must be emphasized that the current study focused on genetically distinct strains of L. braziliensis. These findings, as well as our previous molecular epidemiology observations on the associations between L. braziliensis genotypes and clinical forms of ATL (Queiroz et al., 2012; Guimaraes et al., 2016) undoubtedly work in concert with host genotype, health status of the host, coinfections, and epidemiologic factors to fully account for the polymorphic outcomes of infection. Examples of determinants shown to contribute different clinical phenotypes of L. braziliensis infection include concurrent infections (Meireles et al., 2017; Martinez et al., 2018), pregnancy (Morgan et al., 2007; Guimaraes et al., 2009), and the genetic background of the human host (Castellucci et al., 2005, 2006, 2014).

It should also be pointed out that these observations reflect the earliest events in the host–parasite relationship, and thus the immediate handling of infection by one of its preferred host cell types. These early events can initiate parasite killing or survival, and recruitment of additional host cells to infected tissues, to name some functional effects. In addition to the changes highlighted in Section “Results,” further studies could be used to probe differences that might lead to parasite dissemination versus containment at the local site. Relevant functions would include microbicidal response, survival of the infected cell, and recruitment of host cells that might promote parasite transport out of infected tissues (Charmoy et al., 2010; Goncalves et al., 2011; Ribeiro-Gomes et al., 2012). It is thus relevant that among transcripts up-regulated by infection with the “disseminating” clades A and C, but to a lesser extent clade B (localized disease), are a number of macrophage heat shock or stress response proteins, whereas transcripts relevant to inflammatory response pathways (TLR8, STAT1, TNFSF13B, SYK) in macrophages were down-regulated. These observations will warrant validation, followed by further examination of cellular interactions with respect to function of the implicated pathways. We expect that infected macrophages from chronically infected animals would present quite different patterns of gene expression, reflecting the inflammatory processes occurring in infected tissues at these time points. As there are multiple differences in the degree of transcript expression between clades A–C and clade B, we hypothesize that subtle differences in the degree of transcript suppression or stimulation may collectively contribute toward differences in disease manifestations including parasite dissemination. Finally, our observations also warrant future examination of protein abundance and/or function of the implicated pathways.

Author Contributions

RS and VA performed parasite and macrophage isolation and cultivation, infection experiments, cultured cells RNA extractions, and data analyses. TB performed DNA micro array experiments and data analyses. NE standardized the macrophage culturing and differentiation in the lab, and helped in the micro array data analyses. LG and LA helped in macrophage culturing and infection experiments, and performed annotation of significantly expressed genes and pathways. LHG, PM, and EC were responsible for clinical work in the field that resulted in all isolates of L. braziliensis explored in the study, and were involved in the design of the research. MW and AS were responsible for team coordination, study design, data interpretation, and manuscript preparation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02464/full#supplementary-material