Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Oct 4;21:449–465. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.129

2-(1,3-Oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine and 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl) pyridine

Wioletta Ochędzan-Siodłak 1,, Anna Bihun-Kisiel 1, Dawid Siodłak 1, Anna Poliwoda 1, Błażej Dziuk 1
PMCID: PMC6198059  PMID: 30364733

Abstract

The data presented in this article are related to research articles “Titanium and vanadium catalysts with oxazoline ligands for ethylene-norbornene (co)polymerization (Ochędzan-Siodłak et al., 2018). For the title compounds, 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox) and 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box), the single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurement together with NMR, GC, MS, DSC analysis, like also the method of crystallization are presented.

Keywords: Ligands, Oxazoline, Pyridine, Conformation, Association


Specifications table

Subject area Chemistry
More specific subject area Organic Chemistry, Ligands for Catalysts
Type of data Figures, tables, text file.
X-ray (table, figures), GC–MS (Figures), 13C NMR (figures), DSC (figures), synthesis (text)
How data was acquired X-ray (Xcalibur diffractometer),
NMR (Bruker Ultrashield spectrometer 400 MHz, solvent DMSO-d6),
GC–MS (Hewlett Packard HP7890 A GC system)
DSC (2010 TA calorimeter)
Data format X-ray (analyzed), GC–MS (raw), NMR (raw), DSC (raw)
Experimental factors Crystallization at room temperature. Py-ox - highly anhydrous toluene/hexane mixture, Py-box - DMSO-d6 in NMR tube.
Experimental features Highly anhydrous condition for crystals are required.
Data source location City: Opole, Country: Poland, Latitude: N 50°4023.981, Longitude: E 17°5553.173, (Lat,Long: 50.673328, 17.93143699999996),
Data accessibility The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre no. CCDC 1815355 and CCDC 1580983 (http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, email:deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.).

Value of the data

  • X-Ray structural information for Py-ox and Py-box compounds not coordinated by metal atom is presented.

  • Conformation and association pattern in the crystal state is shown.

  • Crystallization methods are shown.

  • Purification for Py-ox is improved.

1. Data

The presented compounds, 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox) and 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box), are commonly applied as ligands for complexes with transition metals: cobalt [2], rhenium [3], platinum and palladium [4], [5] for Py-ox, as well as copper [6], [7], ruthenium [8], [9], [10], [11], rhodium [12], manganese [13], silver [14], nickel [15], cobalt [16], terbium [17], and iron [18], in the case of Py-box. Some of them reveal catalytic properties. In our work, the Py-ox and Py-box compounds were applied as ligands for titanium and vanadium complexes, which turned out to be active in polymerization of ethylene and copolymerization of ethylene with norbornene [1]. The X-Ray information for Py-ox and Py-box compounds can be important for comparative studies, to show differences between these compounds not coordinated by metal atom and applied as ligands. It can help to understand dependence between the structure and activity of the designed complexes. The presented crystallization methods are worth to notice. The improved method of purification enable to obtain the studied compound of high quality.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Synthesis

2.1.1. 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox)

The synthesis was performed mainly according to Stokes et al. [19]. The crude product was subjected to flash chromatography using the MeOH: AcOEt (1:4) mixture as eluent. Yield 60%. Elemental analysis C8H8N2O results: calculated C 64.85%, H 5.44%, N 18.91%, experimental C 64.92%, H 5.45%, N 19.09%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.65 (1H, J = 4.5 Hz, d), 7.99 (1H, J = 8.0 Hz, d), 7.93 (1H, J = 7.8 Hz, td), 7.54 (1H, m), 4.45 (2H, J = 9.6 Hz, t), 4.00 (2H, J = 9.6 Hz, t). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 162.98, 149.53, 146.52, 137.09, 125.90, 123.80, 67.66, 54.61. GC–MS M+ 148 m/e. Melting temperature 57.0 (54.6–60.0) °C.

2.1.2. 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box)

The synthesis was performed mainly according to Zhu et al. [20]. Yield 76%. Elemental analysis C11H11N3O2 results: calculated C 64.82%, H 5.10%, N 19.34%, experimental: C 64.88%, H 5.12%, N 19.39%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.11 (2H, J1 = 1.2 Hz, J2 = 7.2 Hz, t), 8.02(1H, J1 = 6.4 Hz, J2 = 2.4 Hz, q), 4.45 (4H, J = 9.6 Hz, t), 4.01 (4H, J = 9.6 Hz, t). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 163.10, 147.01, 138.46, 126.00, 68.28, 55.13. GC–MS M+ 217 m/e. Melting temperature 160.6 (159.4–163.0) °C.

2.2. Crystallization

2.2.1. 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox)

The crystals were obtained at room temperature from highly anhydrous toluene/hexane mixture. The solvents were freshly distilled over sodium. The highly anhydrous conditions are crucial. All operations were performed in a glove-box filled with argon. Py-ox (20 mg) was placed in a 5 ml snap cap vial with plastic cap and dissolved in toluene (1 ml). Then, hexane (1 ml) was added and the solution was left to stand at room temperature for a week.

2.2.2. 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box)

The crystals of appropriate quality were obtained at room temperature from DMSO-d6 solution by long standing time in NMR tube. All operations were performed in a glove-box filled with argon. DMSO-d6 solvent from sealed glass ampoules was applied. Py-box (15 mg) and DMSO-d6 (0.6 ml) was placed in NMR tube and the cap was sealed by a parafilm. The solution was left to stand at room temperature for a month.

2.3. X-ray

The single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments were performed at 293.0(1)K on the Xcalibur diffractometer, equipped with a CCD area detector and a graphite monochromator for the MoKα radiation. The reciprocal space was explored by ω scans with detector positions at 60 mm distance from the crystal. The diffraction data processing of studied compounds (Lorentz and polarization corrections were applied) were performed using the CrysAlis CCD [21], [22]. Both structures Py-ox and Py-box were solved in the C2 and P2/n space group respectively, by direct methods and refined by a full-matrix least-squares method using SHELXL14 program [23], [24]. The H atoms were found based on geometrical parameters. In both structures H atoms were refined using a riding model. The structure drawings were prepared using SHELXTL and Mercury programs [25] (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Table 1, Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Molecular conformation of Py-ox (a) and Py-box (b) with atom labeling and the displacement ellipsoids at 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Association of molecule in the crystal structure. Hydrogen contacts are marked by dashed lines. The numbers of atoms and distances are omitted for clarity. All geometric parameters are in Table 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The crystal packing scheme of the title compounds. A view along the c axis of the crystals packing.

Table 1.

X-ray experimental details for 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox) and 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl) pyridine (Py-box).

Py-ox Py-box
Chemical formula C8H8N2O C11H11N3O2
Mr 148.16 217.23
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2 Monoclinic, P2/n
a, b, c (Å) 10.2571 (7), 10.0159 (6), 14.4647 (9) 6.4904 (8), 6.5835 (11), 11.9080 (19)
β (°) 97.497 (6) 94.215 (13)
V3) 1473.31 (16) 507.45 (13)
Z 8 2
Measurement temperature 293.0(1) 293.0(1)
µ (mm−1) 0.09 0.10
Crystal size (mm) 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 0.5 × 0.4 × 0.3
Crystal colour Colourless
Crystal description Plate
Data collection
Radiation wavelength 0.71073
Radiation type MoKα
Source fine-focus sealed tube
Measurement device type Xcalibur
Detector area resolution 1024 × 1024 with blocks 2 × 2
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and observed [I>2σ(I)] reflections 5,034, 2786, 1587 3,172, 993, 459
Rint 0.018 0.048
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.617 0.616
Refinement
R[F2>2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.030, 0.077, 0.86 0.057, 0.173, 0.87
No. of reflections 2786 993
No. of parameters 200 75
No. of restraints 1 0
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.11, −0.09 0.22, −0.18

Table 2.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for Py-ox and Py-box molecules.

Structure 2 (Py-ox)
N1A-C2A 1.386 (7) C5B-H5B 0.9300
N1A-C6A 1.394 (6) C7A-N8A 1.292 (7)
C2A-C3A 1.367 (8) C7A-O11A 1.314 (6)
C2A-H2A 0.9300 C6B-C7B 1.478 (7)
N1B-C6B 1.360 (6) N8A-C9A 1.423 (7)
N1B-C2B 1.393 (7) C7B-N8B 1.289 (6)
C3A-C4A 1.400 (8) C7B-O11B 1.292 (7)
C3A-H3A 0.9300 C9A-C10A 1.518 (8)
C2B-C3B 1.344 (9) C9A-H9AA 0.9700
C2B-H2B 0.9300 C9A-H9AB 0.9700
C4A-C5A 1.307 (8) N8B-C9B 1.427 (7)
C4A-H4A 0.9300 C10A-O11A 1.470 (7)
C3B-C4B 1.361 (9) C10A-H10A 0.9700
C3B-H3B 0.9300 C10A-H10B 0.9700
C5A-C6A 1.335 (6) C9B-C10B 1.513 (8)
C5A-H5A 0.9300 C9B-H9BA 0.9700
C4B-C5B 1.345 (7) C9B-H9BB 0.9700
C4B-H4B 0.9300 O11B-C10B 1.488 (6)
C6A-C7A 1.464 (7) C10B-H10C 0.9700
C5B-C6B 1.342 (6) C10B-H10D 0.9700
C2A-N1A-C6A 116.2 (5) C5B-C6B-C7B 119.1 (5)
C3A-C2A-N1A 122.5 (6) N1B-C6B-C7B 117.4 (5)
C3A-C2A-H2A 118.8 C7A-N8A-C9A 106.3 (5)
N1A-C2A-H2A 118.8 N8B-C7B-O11B 119.6 (6)
C6B-N1B-C2B 115.8 (5) N8B-C7B-C6B 120.4 (6)
C2A-C3A-C4A 116.1 (6) O11B-C7B-C6B 120.0 (5)
C2A-C3A-H3A 122.0 N8A-C9A-C10A 106.9 (6)
C4A-C3A-H3A 122.0 N8A-C9A-H9AA 110.3
C3B-C2B-N1B 121.2 (6) C10A-C9A-H9AA 110.3
C3B-C2B-H2B 119.4 N8A-C9A-H9AB 110.3
N1B-C2B-H2B 119.4 C10A-C9A-H9AB 110.3
C5A-C4A-C3A 123.3 (6) H9AA-C9A-H9AB 108.6
C5A-C4A-H4A 118.3 C7B-N8B-C9B 105.7 (5)
C3A-C4A-H4A 118.3 O11A-C10A-C9A 101.9 (4)
C2B-C3B-C4B 120.0 (6) O11A-C10A-H10A 111.4
C2B-C3B-H3B 120.0 C9A-C10A-H10A 111.4
C4B-C3B-H3B 120.0 O11A-C10A-H10B 111.4
C4A-C5A-C6A 119.6 (6) C9A-C10A-H10B 111.4
C4A-C5A-H5A 120.2 H10A-C10A-H10B 109.3
C6A-C5A-H5A 120.2 N8B-C9B-C10B 106.8 (4)
C5B-C4B-C3B 120.2 (6) N8B-C9B-H9BA 110.4
C5B-C4B-H4B 119.9 C10B-C9B-H9BA 110.4
C3B-C4B-H4B 119.9 N8B-C9B-H9BB 110.4
C5A-C6A-N1A 122.4 (5) C10B-C9B-H9BB 110.4
C5A-C6A-C7A 118.1 (5) H9BA-C9B-H9BB 108.6
N1A-C6A-C7A 119.6 (5) C7A-O11A-C10A 106.8 (5)
C6B-C5B-C4B 119.1 (5) C7B-O11B-C10B 106.1 (5)
C6B-C5B-H5B 120.5 O11B-C10B-C9B 101.7 (5)
C4B-C5B-H5B 120.5 O11B-C10B-H10C 111.4
N8A-C7A-O11A 118.1 (5) C9B-C10B-H10C 111.4
N8A-C7A-C6A 122.8 (5) O11B-C10B-H10D 111.4
O11A-C7A-C6A 119.1 (6) C9B-C10B-H10D 111.4
C5B-C6B-N1B 123.6 (5) H10C-C10B-H10D 109.3



Symmetry code(s): (i) −x+1/2, y, −z+1/2.



Structure 1 (Py-Box)
N1-C2i 1.355 (3) C5-O9 1.316 (4)
N1-C2 1.355 (3) N6-C7 1.448 (4)
C2-C3 1.381 (4) C7-C8 1.502 (4)
C2-C5 1.468 (4) C7-H7A 0.9700
C3-C4 1.380 (4) C7-H7B 0.9700
C3-H3 0.9300 C8-O9 1.471 (3)
C4-C3i 1.380 (4) C8-H8A 0.9700
C4-H4 0.9300 C8-H8B 0.9700
C5-N6 1.293 (3)
C2i-N1-C2 116.0 (4) N6-C7-C8 105.1 (2)
N1-C2-C3 123.4 (3) N6-C7-H7A 110.7
N1-C2-C5 116.5 (3) C8-C7-H7A 110.7
C3-C2-C5 120.0 (2) N6-C7-H7B 110.7
C4-C3-C2 119.5 (3) C8-C7-H7B 110.7
C4-C3-H3 120.2 H7A-C7-H7B 108.8
C2-C3-H3 120.2 O9-C8-C7 104.0 (3)
C3i-C4-C3 118.1 (4) O9-C8-H8A 110.9
C3i-C4-H4 121.0 C7-C8-H8A 110.9
C3-C4-H4 121.0 O9-C8-H8B 110.9
N6-C5-O9 118.1 (2) C7-C8-H8B 110.9
N6-C5-C2 121.0 (3) H8A-C8-H8B 109.0
O9-C5-C2 120.9 (2) C5-O9-C8 105.8 (2)
C5-N6-C7 106.9 (2)

2.3.1. 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox)

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

2.3.2. 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box)

Image 4

Image 5

Image 6

2.4. NMR

Bruker Ultrashield spectrometer 400 MHz, solvent DMSO-d6, TMS standard. Concentration: 15 mg in 0.6 ml (Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

1H NMR spectrum for 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox) in DMSO-d6.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

13C NMR spectrum for 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox) in DMSO-d6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

1H NMR spectrum for 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box) in DMSO-d6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

13C NMR spectrum for 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box) in DMSO-d6.

2.5. GC–MS

Hewlett Packard HP7890 A GC system, equipped with 7000 GC/MS triple-quadrupol and HP-5 capilar 300 m × 0.32 mm column with 0.25 µm dimethylpolysilloxane stationary phase, dopped by 5% of phenylpolysilloxane (Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

GC analysis of 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

MS analysis of 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

GC analysis of 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

MS analysis of 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box).

2.6. DSC

The melting temperatures were measured by differential scanning calorimetry DSC 2010 TA instrument calorimeter equipped with an automated sampler. The data were collected with the heat/cool/heat cycle at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere (Figs. 12 and 13).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

DSC analysis of 2-(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-ox).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

DSC analysis of 2,6-bis(1,3-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine (Py-box).

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.129.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material.

mmc1.pdf (325.7KB, pdf)

.

References

  • 1.Ochędzan-Siodłak W., Bihun-Kisiel A., Siodłak D., Poliwoda A., Dziuk B. Titanium and vanadium catalysts with oxazoline ligands for ethylenenorbornene (co)polymerization. Eur. Polym. J. 2018;106:148–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guo J., Liu H., Bi J., Zhang C., Zhang H., Bai C., Hu Y., Zhang X. Pyridine-oxazoline and quinoline-oxazoline ligated cobalt complexes: synthesis, characterization, and 1,3-butadiene polymerization behaviors. Inorganica Chim. Acta. 2015;435:305–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nganga J.K., Samanamu C.R., Tanski J.M., Pacheco C., Saucedo C., Batista V.S., Grice K.A., Ertem M.Z., Angeles-Boza A.M. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 catalyzed by Re(pyridineoxazoline)(CO)3Cl. Complexes Inorg. Chem. 2017;56:3214–3226. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paschke N., Röndigs A., Poppenborg H., Wolff J.E.A., Krebs B. Reaction of the diaqua(2-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-oxazoline)platinum(II) and -palladium(II) dications with the model nucleobases 1-methylthymine and 1-methyluracil: syntheses, spectroscopic properties and X-ray crystal structures. Inorganica Chim. Acta. 1997;264:239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fedorov B.S., Golovina N.I., Strukov G.V., Kedrov V.V., Boiko G.N., Shilov G.V., Barinova L.S., Trofimova R.F., Atovmyan L.O. Synthesis and the crystal structures of N-(2-nitroxyethyl)isonicotinamide and its complexes with PdCl2 and PtCl2 as potential antitumor medicines. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001;50:520–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kuai H.W., Cheng X.C., Li D.H., Hu T., Zhu X.H. Syntheses, characterization and properties of silver, copper and palladium complexes from bis(oxazoline)-containing ligands. J. Solid State Chem. 2015;228:65–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhu Y.Y., Cui C., Li N., Wang B.W., Wang Z.M., Gao S. Constructing a series of azide‐bridged CuII magnetic low‐dimensional coordination polymers by using Pybox ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013;17:3101–3111. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Doberer D., Slugovc C., Schmid R., Kirchner K., Mereiter K. Coordination chemistry of 2,6-bis(oxazolinyl)-pyridine ruthenium complexes. Monatsh. Chem. 1999;130:717–723. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cuervo D., Menendez-Pedregal E., Diez J., Gamasa M.P. Mononuclear ruthenium(II) complexes bearing the (S,S)-iPr-pybox ligand. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011;696:1861–1867. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Motoyama Y., Kurihara O., Murata K., Aoki K., Nishiyama H. Chiral ruthenium−bis(oxazolinyl)pyridine complexes of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds: enantioface-selective coordination of olefins. Organometallics. 2000;19:1025–1034. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nishiyama H., Itoh Y., Sugawara Y., Matsumoto H., Aoki K., Itoh K. Chiral ruthenium(ii)–bis(2-oxazolin-2-yl)pyridine complexes. Asymmetric catalytic cyclopropanation of olefins and diazoacetates. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995;68:1247–1262. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nishiyama H., Niwa E., Inoue T., Ishima Y., Aoki K. Novel metallacycle complexes from bis(oxazolinyl)pyridine−rhodium(i) species and diynes. Organometallics. 2002;21:2572–2574. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu N., Jia L.-H., Wu Z.-Q., Zhu Y.-Y., Wang B.-W., Gao S. Wuji Huaxue Xuebao (Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. ) 2014;30:1660. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dai C.H., Mao F.L., Naturforsch Z. Helical chain Ag(I) complexes with a tridentate N-donor ligand: syntheses, structural characterization, and properties. Z. Naturforsch. B: J. Chem. Sci. 2015;70:851–856. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang Y.H., Zahng Y., Yue Q., Gan C.G. Synthesis, characterization and crystal structure of Ni(Pybox)(SCN)2(CH3OH) Huaxue Yanjiu Yu Yingyong(Chem. Res. Appl.) 2011;23:1525. (Chin) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guo J., Wang B., Bi J., Zhang C., Zhang H., Bai C., Hu Y., Zhang X. Synthesis, characterization and 1,3-butadiene polymerization studies of cobalt dichloride complexes bearing pyridine bisoxazoline ligands. Polymer. 2015;59:124–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Bettencourt-Dias A., Barber P.S., Viswanathan S., de Lill D.T., Rollett A., Ling G., Altun S. Para-derivatized pybox ligands as sensitizers in highly luminescent Ln(III) complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2010;49:8848–8861. doi: 10.1021/ic101034y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu Y.Y., Li H.Q., Ding Z.Y., Lu X.J., Zhao L., Meng Y.S., Liu T., Gao S. Spin transitions in a series of [Fe(pybox)2]2+ complexes modulated by ligand structures, counter anions, and solvents. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016;3:1624–1636. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stokes B.J., Opra S.M., Sigman M.S. Palladium-catalyzed allylic cross-coupling reactions of primary and secondary homoallylic electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11408–11411. doi: 10.1021/ja305403s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu Y.Y., Cui C., Li N., Wang B.W., Wang Z.M., Gao S. Constructing a series of azide-bridged CuII magnetic low-dimensional coordination polymers by using pybox ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013;17:3101–3111. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.CrysAlis CCD, Oxford Diffraction Ltd. Abingdon, England, 2002.
  • 22.CrysAlis RED, Oxford Diffraction Ltd. Abingdon, England, 2002.
  • 23.Sheldrick G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. A. 2008;64:112–122. doi: 10.1107/S0108767307043930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sheldrick G.M. New features added to the refinement program SHELXL since 2008 are described and explained. Acta Cryst. 2015;C71:3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Macrae C.F., Bruno I.J., Chisholm J.A., Edgington P.R., McCabe P., Pidcock E., Rodriguez-Monge L., Taylor R., van de Streek J., Wood P.A. Mercury CSD 2.0 - new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008;41:466–470. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material.

mmc1.pdf (325.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES