Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess different patterns of the human embryo secretome analysed as protein levels in culture media. Furthermore, analyses to correlate protein levels with quality and timing to development of human embryos were performed.
Material and methods: Human day-2 cryopreserved embryos were cultured for four days in an EmbryoScope® with a time-lapse camera, and embryo quality was evaluated retrospectively. After culture, the media were collected and relative levels of secreted proteins were analysed using Proseek Multiplex Assays. Protein levels were evaluated in relation to timing to development and the ability to form a blastocyst.
Results: Specific patterns of timing of development of blastocysts were found, where a difference in time to start of cavitation was found between high- and low-quality blastocysts. There appeared to be a correlation between specific protein patterns and successful formation of morulae and blastocysts. Embryos developing into blastocysts had higher levels of EMMPRIN than arrested embryos, and levels of caspase-3 were lower in high- versus low-quality blastocysts. Also, higher levels of VEGF-A, IL-6, and EMMPRIN correlated with shorter times to morula formation.
Conclusions: The secretome and timing to development differ in embryos forming blastocysts and those that become arrested, and in high- versus low-quality blastocysts. The levels of certain proteins also correlate to specific times to development.
Keywords: Blastocyst, caspase-3, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer, interleukin-6, prediction, secretome, time-lapse, vascular endothelial growth factor A
Introduction
Infertility affects about 15% of all couples of reproductive age. Assisted reproduction through in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be used as a treatment for these couples. IVF has been performed routinely for many years, although pregnancy rates have not improved much in recent years, and, according to Calhaz-Jorge and colleagues (1) and the Swedish National Quality Register for Assisted Fertilisation (Q-IVF; www.medscinet.com/qivf), the success rate after IVF treatment in Sweden as of today is approximately 25–30%. Success rate is measured as live born infants after IVF treatment. There is a demand for improved prediction models to increase the implantation rate. Early prediction of the viability of human embryos developed and matured in vitro still remains challenging. The predominant non-invasive technique for selecting embryos is based on morphology (2), where variables such as timing of cleavage and blastocyst formation as well as developmental kinetics are evaluated. The morphological approach, however, is inadequate for prediction of embryo quality and success rate after transfer, meaning a live born infant. In recent years several studies have been performed that have been focused on the development of new and more sophisticated non-invasive methods for evaluation of embryo quality (3–5). Among the methods used, different approaches have been investigated, including proteomics, metabolomics, and genomics (6–8). The prediction models used in IVF clinics today are mainly based on general health factors such as body mass index (BMI), age, smoking, and reason for infertility, as well as biological markers and finally morphology of the embryo during development.
Monitoring embryo development by means of a time-lapse technique has improved embryo selection during IVF, although the method is considered subjective and non-standardized (9). In recent years, more quantitative methods and algorithms for embryo selection have been sought, and new algorithms aimed at use in clinical praxis are being evaluated frequently (10–15). Differences in protein expression related to the development and viability of the early embryo have been described by Katz-Jaffe and McReynolds (16). Until day 3, when the human embryo consists of four to six cells, maternal transcripts and proteins support embryo development and differentiation. Zygotic genome activation starts at day 3, whereas most of the maternal transcripts rapidly disappear and are replaced by novel embryonic transcripts. During these early stages in embryo development, the embryos produce soluble ligands and receptors for various autocrine and paracrine factors that support the need of the growing embryo and make the endometrium receptive for it (17). The secretome, defined as proteins secreted at any given time or under certain physiological conditions, constitutes an important group of proteins that control and regulate a multitude of biological and physiological processes (18).
Secretome analysis of culture medium, in which the embryo grows, represents a non-invasive method of retrieving information about the quality of the embryo, which together with morphology and time-lapse data could aid in the decision concerning embryo selection for transfer.
In order to develop and improve the prediction models for IVF treatment, we analysed the secretome of individual human embryos that developed into blastocysts, compared with that from arrested embryos, using Proseek Multiplex Assays (Olink Bioscience, Sweden). We also investigated if the different protein levels in the secretome corresponded to the times to different developmental stages of embryos that did and did not develop into blastocysts.
Materials and methods
Human embryo culture
Couples that had undergone IVF treatment at the Centre for Reproduction, Uppsala University Hospital or the Carl von Linné Clinic in Uppsala were asked to donate surplus cryopreserved embryos (n = 47) that, according to Swedish law, otherwise had to be destroyed after the maximum allowed storage time of five years. At the Centre for Reproduction and the Carl von Linné Clinic oocytes were inseminated in fertilization medium (G-IVF™ Plus, Vitrolife®, Sweden and Sydney IVF, Cook®, Australia, respectively) and transferred to cleavage medium (G1™ Plus, Vitrolife®, Sweden and Sydney IVF, Cook®, Australia, respectively) after evaluation of fertilization (19). Only zygotes with two pro-nuclei were selected for further culture. The embryos were further cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and with 6% CO2/6% O2. On day 2, only embryos with four blastomeres, <20% fragmentation, and without abnormalities were cryopreserved at the Centre for Reproduction. Embryo scoring was routinely performed by two embryologists. At the Carl von Linné Clinic only embryos with four to six blastomeres, <20% fragmentation, a visible single nucleus in at least 50% of the blastomeres, and without major variation in blastomere size were cryopreserved on day 2. At both sites, embryos were scored 42–44 hours after insemination and cryopreserved (Cryopreservation Kit; Sydney IVF, Cook®, Australia).
Embryo culture for the study experiments was performed at the Centre for Reproduction, Uppsala University Hospital. A total of 47 embryos were used in four individual experiments.
Human day-2 cryopreserved embryos were thawed (Sydney IVF Thawing kit, Cook®, Australia), and viable embryos were transferred to an EmbryoScope® (Unisense FertiliTech, Aarhus, Denmark), where they were cultured for four days (i.e. until day 6 after fertilization) in equilibrated cleavage-stage medium containing human serum albumin, insulin, salts, amino acids, and penicillin G (CCM™, Vitrolife®, Sweden) in 6% CO2 and 6% O2 at 37 °C. As controls to detect background levels of proteins in the culture media, culture media without embryos were used. Embryo quality was evaluated retrospectively using standard morphological criteria for cleavage-stage embryos, according to the system developed by Gardner et al. (20) and Hardarson et al. (21) using time-lapse photography generated by the EmbryoScope®. Scoring is based on different timing to development as well as on any abnormal features such as fragmentation, multi-nuclei, or irregular cell divisions; 6 is the highest score (hatched embryo) and 1 the lowest. The trophectoderm and the inner cell mass are also scored, where A is the highest, reflecting evenly shaped cells in the trophectoderm and normal size and shape of the inner cell mass. In our study, high-quality embryos scored ≥4BB and low-quality embryos <4BB, where 4 indicates that the embryo had developed into a blastocyst where the cavity is greater than the original volume of the embryo and the zona pellucida is thinned. Furthermore, letter B indicates that the inner cell mass is easily discernible, with many cells loosely grouped. A trophectoderm scored as B (the second letter) reflects few cells forming a loose epithelium.
After four days of culture in the EmbryoScope® the culture medium was collected (20 μL). All samples were stored at –70 °C until further analysis.
Multiplex proximity extension assay
The relative levels of proteins secreted into embryo culture medium were analysed by using Proseek Multiplex Assays (Olink Bioscience, Sweden), based on proximity extension assay (PEA) technology (22,23). The assay has sensitivity down to fg/mL and detects relative protein values in 1 μL samples that can be used for comparison between groups, but not for absolute quantification. The PEA technique with combined double antibodies and subsequent qRT-PCR results in high specificity and can be multiplexed without introducing cross-reactivity (22,23). For this study the Multiplex Oncology I v296 × 96 panel was chosen, as many of the tumour-associated proteins are of importance for normal biological processes such as angiogenesis, cell–cell signalling, growth control, and inflammation. For quantification in the PEA, the Fluidigm BioMark™ HD real-time PCR platform was used (23). Each plate was run with three negative assay controls (buffer) and three inter-plate assay controls. Every sample was also spiked with two incubation controls (green fluorescent protein and phycoerythrin), one extension control, and one detection control.
The platform provides normalized protein expression (NPX) data on a Log2 scale, where a high protein value corresponds to a high protein concentration. For each protein, a limit of detection was calculated (mean for the negative control + three standard deviations), and measurements below this limit were removed from further analyses. For a protein to be detected, the limit was set to >0.3 Cq above limit of detection (LOD).
The relative levels of the 92 human proteins were measured in 47 samples of embryo culture medium and two controls (fresh culture medium and conditioned culture medium). To rule out any influence of the mineral oil covering the wells during culture of the embryos, protein levels in the mineral oil were also analysed.
Statistical analyses
All data, including demographic data, timing to development, and protein levels in the culture media, were not normally distributed, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for statistical comparisons. The data are presented as median and range (minimum–maximum). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess predictive ability concerning the development of blastocysts at arbitrarily chosen time points in connection with morula formation. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at the optimal cut-off time point chosen. Correlation between protein levels and time to morula formation was calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, where the obtained coefficient is a measurement of the strength of the correlation between protein levels and time to morula formation. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v. 20.0 (IBM-SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows software package.
Ethics approval and research performance
The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board, Uppsala, Sweden (2008/689-32; 2012/328). Informed consent was obtained from each couple who donated embryos for the study. All research methods were performed according to relevant guidelines and regulations.
Results
Human embryo development
Among the embryos used for culture, 63.8% (n = 30) developed into blastocysts, and the remaining 36.2% (n = 17) were considered arrested. The majority of blastocysts, 76.7% (n = 23) were high-quality blastocysts (≥4BB), whereas 23.3% (n = 7) were of low quality (<4BB). As shown in Table I, a significant difference in the percentage of viable cells after thawing was noted between embryos that developed into blastocysts and those that did not (i.e. were arrested) (P = 0.001), and there was also a significant difference when high- and low-quality blastocysts were compared (Table II) (P = 0.005).
Table II.
Low-quality blastocysts (n = 7) | High-quality blastocysts (n = 23) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of cells at start, median (range) | 4 (4–7) | 4 (3–8) | 0.277 |
Number of viable cells at start, median (range) | 4 (3–5) | 4 (3–8) | 0.900 |
Percentage viable cells at start, median (range) | 83.33 (71–100) | 100 (75–100)** | 0.005 |
P < 0.01 compared with low-quality blastocysts, Mann–Whitney U test.
Timing of development
The times to different developmental stages after thawing of the embryos were retrieved from the EmbryoScope®. When comparing embryos that developed into blastocysts with those that were arrested, significantly shorter times to formation of a morula (51.4 h versus 61.6 h; P = 0.008) (Table III) and start of cavitation (63.0 h versus 83.9 h; P = 0.001) (Table III) were observed. Also, embryos developing into high-quality blastocysts displayed a significantly shorter time to the start of cavitation compared with those that developed into low-quality blastocysts (61.1 h versus 69.7 h; P = 0.039) (Table IV), and there was a tendency towards a shorter time to formation of a morula (50.6 h versus 57.2 h; P = 0.059) (Table IV).
Table III.
Arrested embryos n = 17 |
Blastocysts n = 30 |
P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | median h (range) | n | median h (range) | ||
Time to first cleavage | 16 | 18.0 (3.1–36.9) | 30 | 11.8 (3.1–35.4)b | 0.067 |
Time to morula | 10 | 61.6 (46.4–78.9) | 29 | 51.4 (31.3–72.1)** | 0.008 |
Time to start of cavitation | 5 | 83.9 (75.3–94.2) | 30 | 63.0 (42.4–79.4)*** | 0.001 |
Time to start of expansion | 2 | 88.3 (86.6–90.0) | 30 | 71.2 (47.9–88.1)a | 0.029 |
Time to start of hatching | 8 | 87.2 (70.6–94.1) | N/A |
P < 0.01 compared with arrested embryos, Mann–Whitney U test.
P < 0.001 compared with arrested embryos, Mann–Whitney U test.
Owing to the low number of arrested embryos that started to expand, the significant difference in time to this stage is not noted.
Tendency.
Table IV.
Low-quality blastocysts n = 7 |
High-quality blastocysts n = 23 |
P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | median h (range) | n | median h (range) | ||
Time to first cleavage | 7 | 9.3 (3.1–24.6) | 23 | 13.1 (4.3–35.4) | 0.477 |
Time to morula | 6 | 57.2 (45.9–67.3) | 23 | 50.6 (31.3–72.1)a | 0.059 |
Time to start of cavitation | 7 | 69.7 (56.6–79.3) | 23 | 61.1 (42.4–79.4)* | 0.039 |
Time to start of expansion | 7 | 79.0 (60.9–88.1) | 23 | 66.9 (47.9–87.4) | 0.091 |
Time to start of hatching | 8 | 87.2 (70.6–94.1) | N/A |
P < 0.05 compared with low-quality blastocysts, Mann–Whitney U test.
Tendency.
Secretomics of developing embryos
In culture medium collected from human embryos on developmental day 6, nine proteins were detected that were at a higher concentration than background levels in conditioned medium, i.e. culture medium without embryo (Figure 1; Table V). The proteins were vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), interleukin-6 (IL-6), extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN), placental growth factor (PlGF), cystatin B, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), caspase-3, epididymal secretory protein (HE-4), and interleukin-8 (IL-8). The levels of EMMPRIN were significantly higher in connection with embryos developing into blastocysts versus arrested embryos (P = 0.003; Figure 1; Table V). There was also a tendency towards higher levels of IL-6 and lower levels of caspase-3 in connection with blastocysts versus arrested embryos (P = 0.059 and 0.076, respectively). In high-quality blastocyst culture media, the levels of caspase-3 differed significantly compared with those in culture media from low-quality blastocysts (P = 0.043; Figure 2; Table VI). Furthermore, a tendency towards higher levels of VEGF-A (P = 0.052) was noted in culture media from blastocysts of high quality versus blastocysts of low quality.
Table V.
Arrested embryos n = 17 |
Blastocysts n = 30 |
P value | Background CCM™ medium |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | median (range) | n | median (range) | conditioned medium | fresh medium | |||
VEGF-A | 17 | 2.3 (2.0–3.2) | 28 | 2.4 (1.8–4.6) | 0.472 | 2.1 (2.1–2.1) | 2.1 (2.0–2.2) | |
IL-6 | 15 | 2.1 (1.1–4.9) | 28 | 3.2 (0.9–5.3)a | 0.059 | n.d. | n.d. | |
EMMPRIN | 17 | 2.9 (2.7–4.2) | 28 | 3.3 (2.6–4.2)** | 0.003 | 2.3 (2.3–2.3) | 2.4 (2.4– 2.4) | |
PlGF | 17 | 0.8 (0.5–2.7) | 27 | 0.8 (0.5–4.6) | 0.274 | 0.6 (0.6–0.7) | 0.6 (0.5–0.6) | |
Cystatin B | 17 | 1.4 (0.8–2.2) | 27 | 1.3 (0.8–3.5) | 0.752 | 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | |
EpCAM | 17 | 3.5 (2.6–5.5) | 28 | 3.6 (2.7–7.2) | 0.489 | 2.9 (2.9–2.9) | 2.8 (2.8–2.9) | |
Caspase-3 | 15 | 1.8 (0.8–2.5) | 28 | 1.4 (0.4–5.3)a | 0.076 | n.d. | n.d. | |
HE-4 | 16 | 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | 28 | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.980 | n.d. | n.d. | |
IL-8 | 16 | 0.9 (0.6–3.7) | 24 | (0.5–6.1) | 0.978 | 0.8 (0.8 – 0.8) | n.d. |
P < 0.01 compared with arrested embryos, Mann–Whitney U test.
Tendency.
n.d. = not detected.
Table VI.
Low-quality blastocysts n = 7 |
High-quality blastocysts n = 23 |
P value | Background CCM™ medium |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | median (range) | n | median (range) | conditioned medium | fresh medium | ||
VEGF-A | 6 | 1.9 (1.8–3.5) | 22 | 2.4 (2.1–4.6)a | 0.052 | 2.1 (2.1–2.1) | 2.1 (2.0–2.2) |
IL-6 | 6 | 2.5 (0.9–4.7) | 22 | 3.2 (1.1–5.3) | 0.369 | n.d. | n.d. |
EMMPRIN | 6 | 3.3 (3.1–3.8) | 22 | 3.3 (2.6–4.2) | 0.822 | 2.3 (2.3–2.3) | 2.4 (2.4–2.4) |
PlGF | 5 | 0.7 (0.5–2.3) | 22 | 0.8 (0.6–4.6) | 0.413 | 0.6 (0.6–0.7) | 0.6 (0.5–0.6) |
Cystatin B | 6 | 1.2 (0.8–2.0) | 21 | 1.3 (1.0–3.5) | 0.597 | 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) |
EpCAM | 6 | 3.4 (2.7–4.6) | 22 | 3.7 (2.7–7.2) | 0.261 | 2.9 (2.9–2.9) | 2.8 (2.8–2.9) |
Caspase-3 | 6 | 1.8 (1.3–2.6) | 22 | 1.2 (0.4–5.3)* | 0.043 | n.d. | n.d. |
HE-4 | 6 | 0.6 (0.4–0.9) | 22 | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.495 | n.d. | n.d. |
IL-8 | 3 | (1.0–1.7) | 21 | (0.5–6.1) | 0.123 | 0.8 (0.8–0.8) | n.d. |
P < 0.05 compared with low-quality blastocysts, Mann–Whitney U test.
Tendency.
n.d.: not detected.
Time to morula formation and protein levels
Based on the finding that a shorter time to morula formation is associated with development of blastocysts (Table III), receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed regarding the prediction of blastocyst development at arbitrarily chosen time points, and a cut-off value was defined (Figure 3). At a value of 51.2 h to morula formation, a sensitivity level of 48% and specificity of 90% to predict development of a blastocyst with an accuracy of 79% was found.
Two groups were defined using the cut-off time for morula formation. The secretome was analysed, focusing on the proteins that differed between embryos developing into blastocysts and those that did not, as well as between high-quality and low-quality blastocysts (Tables V and VI). The levels of VEGF-A, IL-6, and EMMPRIN were significantly higher in connection with embryos with a shorter time to morula formation compared with those that developed more slowly (P = 0.016, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively; Figure 4; Table VII). The levels of caspase-3 were also investigated, since differences had been detected between high-quality and low-quality blastocysts, but no significant differences were found between embryos with a shorter time to morula formation compared with those that developed more slowly (P = 0.858; Figure 4; Table VII).
Table VII.
Faster than 51.2 hours |
Slower than 51.2 hours |
P value | Background CCM™ medium |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | median (range) | n | median (range) | conditioned medium | fresh medium | ||
VEGF-A | 14 | 2.5 (2.1–4.6) | 22 | 2.2 (1.8–3.9)* | 0.016 | 2.1 (2.1–2.1) | 2.1 (2.0–2.2) |
IL-6 | 14 | 4.0 (1.1–5.3) | 23 | 2.3 (0.9–4.2)** | 0.004 | n.d. | n.d. |
EMMPRIN | 14 | 3.4 (2.8–4.2) | 23 | 3.1 (2.6–3.9)** | 0.002 | 2.3 (2.3–2.3) | 2.4 (2.4– 2.4) |
Caspase-3 | 14 | 1.2 (0.9–5.3) | 22 | 1.5 (0.4–2.5) | 0.858 | n.d. | n.d. |
P < 0.05 compared with embryos developing faster to morula, Mann–Whitney U test.
P < 0.01 compared with embryos developing faster to morula, Mann–Whitney U test.
A correlation analysis was performed concerning protein levels in the media and time to morula formation (Figure 5). Significantly higher levels of VEGF-A (P = 0.023), IL-6 (P = 0.003), and EMMPRIN (P = 0.001) were detected in connection with embryos developing more quickly to morula stage compared with those that developed more slowly (Figure 5).
Discussion
Human embryo development and maturation have to occur in a chronological order following certain critical steps. Timing of development and protein expression patterns might theoretically be used for prediction of viability of human embryos in connection with IVF. In our study, specific patterns of timing of development of blastocysts were found, where shorter time to morula stage correlated with the development of blastocysts, a result which is supported by those of other studies (24). Furthermore, we found that in culture medium there is a correlation between the levels of specific proteins and the formation of morulae and blastocysts. Among the detected proteins, VEGF-A, IL-6, and EMMPRIN (also known as CD147 or basigin) have been reported before as biomarkers of embryo development (17, 25–27), whereas, to our knowledge, this is the first time that PlGF, cystatin B, EpCAM, caspase-3, HE-4, and IL-8 have been detected in the secretome from early embryos and blastocysts. Interestingly, when comparing blastocysts and arrested embryos, the relative protein levels of EMMPRIN differed significantly. Furthermore, levels of IL-6 and caspase-3 in culture media tended to differ between blastocysts and arrested embryos. When analysing blastocysts only, levels of caspase-3 were significantly lower, and those of VEGF-A tended to be higher in high-quality blastocysts compared with low-quality ones, which might suggest that these proteins could be considered as potential markers of the development of high-quality blastocysts.
EMMPRIN is a multifunctional transmembrane glycoprotein receptor with various binding partners (28). A soluble form of EMMPRIN, which can be cleaved from the full-length protein in the presence of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), has been described (29). In agreement with our results, transcripts for EMMPRIN have been detected in human blastocysts (27), being secreted at a higher level in embryos that reached the blastocyst stage, and it has also been shown to be highly up-regulated in murine blastocysts (30). EMMPRIN is of importance in early pregnancy for adequate implantation, invasion, and differentiation of trophoblasts (31), and in most EMMPRIN-null mice the embryos fail to implant (32). Further, the protein is implicated in tumour biology, where it can increase migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis by enhancing the expression of MMPs and VEGF-A, among other things (28). Expression of EMMPRIN in association with exosome release has been reported for e.g. vessel formation, where the exosomes are released from cardiomyocytes and mesenchymal cells (33). Also, exosomes are released from bovine embryos during culturing, and these exosomes are important for blastocyst formation and quality (34). To our knowledge, there is no information on whether human embryos release exosomes, but one could assume that it is the case. However, the effect of human embryo-derived exosomes and their secreted proteins has been difficult to elucidate (35). Also, there are no reports on exosome-released EMMPRIN in human embryos.
Expression of VEGF-A has been suggested to promote implantation of the embryo and its vascular development (17), and expression of receptors for VEGF-A in the endometrium has, furthermore, been shown to be crucial for successful implantation (36). Early expression of VEGF-A in human embryos has been shown in 3-cell-stage embryos as well as in blastocysts (17,25).
Caspase-3 is an effector caspase involved in apoptosis. Transcripts for caspase-3 are found in human oocytes and in preimplantation embryos at all stages (with <20% fragmentation) (37).
IL-6 is produced by the growing embryo, and blastocysts that secrete it seem to become implanted to a greater extent than blastocysts that do not (11). We found that IL-6 was secreted at a higher level in embryos that reached the blastocyst stage than in arrested embryos. IL-6 plays an important role in preimplantation development of the embryo, and there is growing evidence that it is of importance for blastocyst hatching, implantation, establishment of the placenta, and immune tolerance of the pregnancy (38, 39). The IL-6 receptor is found on blastocysts, trophoblasts, and endometrium (26).
Although not significant when comparing high- and low-quality blastocysts, expression levels of PlGF, cystatin B, EpCAM, HE-4, and IL-8 in culture media are of interest. Previous research has concerned attempts to establish the role of PlGF in embryogenesis and implantation, but PlGF has not been detected in culture medium from human embryos (11). Thus, our study is the first to show that PlGF, as a protein, is secreted from human embryos in culture, and we suggest that the reason for detection in our study is the sensitivity of the PEA method used. The finding is in line with the results of a recent study carried out to investigate the gene expression profile of trophectoderm cells from day-5 blastocysts, where PlGF expression was reported to be up-regulated (40). The receptor for PlGF, kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), was up-regulated in endometrial cells at the same time (40). These findings suggest that PlGF has an autocrine role in trophoblast function during early embryo development and also a paracrine role in the subsequent angiogenesis of implantation and placentation, since trophectoderm cells at this stage were found without expression of KDR (40, 41).
The proteins cystatin B, EpCAM, HE-4, and IL-8 are all of known relevance as regards human embryo development (42,43), HE-4 being a protease inhibitor involved in sperm maturation (42,43). Cystatin B has a role in protecting against the proteases leaking from lysosomes. One could speculate that cystatin B might be secreted by surrounding blastomeres expressing caspase-3 in the embryo, as an attempt to inhibit the release of lysosomal proteases from dying cells. EpCAM is a transmembrane glycoprotein and is known as a surface marker on undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells, where it is of relevance for embryonic stem cell proliferation and differentiation (44,45). EpCAM up-regulates the expression of FABP5, MYC, and cyclins A and E, all proteins known to be important for numerous biological processes, e.g. fatty acid and glucose metabolism processes and cell cycle regulation. Previous investigators reported that the presence of human blastocysts up-regulates the production of IL-8 by epithelial cells of the endometrium, but they failed to detect secretion of IL-8 by arrested embryos and blastocysts (46). However, they used a much smaller sample volume and a less sensitive assay, which might explain the lack of detection. Both receptors for IL-8 (CXCR1 and CXCR2) are expressed in the human endometrium (47), suggesting a role for IL-8 in the cross-talk between blastocyst and endometrium.
The most commonly used technique for selecting embryos for transfer is based on embryo morphology (2), where timing of development is studied. This is, however, a non-standardized method and limited due to inter-individual variability, since evaluation of morphology is performed manually. In previous studies, the impact of using time-lapse photography has been shown to correlate well with increased success rates after IVF treatment (48). Timing to morula formation has been shown to be crucial for the ability of the embryo to develop into a blastocyst (24), and our results are in agreement with this. We also conclude that timing to morula formation is of major importance as regards the formation of high-quality blastocysts. We also showed that the levels of protein expression and time to morula formation were significantly correlated. The protein levels of VEGF-A, IL-6, and EMMPRIN were significantly higher in the embryos that had a shorter time to morula formation.
The detection method used for analysing proteins involved only 1 μL of culture medium. The multiplex proximity extension assay (PEA) is a unique and highly sensitive method that involves two dedicated antibodies and a qRT-PCR set-up. This technology can be multiplexed without introducing cross-reactivity (22,23). The benefit of the method is the possibility of detecting several proteins at the same time in a small volume. For this purpose, a panel of 92 known biomarker proteins was used, many of which have been found to be of relevance in embryogenesis, implantation, and early trophoblast invasion. This technology could be an alternative method to detect biomarkers in culture medium on a routine basis, and be a complement to the predictive methods used today. We have previously tried to analyse these protein levels by mass spectrometry but failed as a result of the high content of other compounds in the culture media that masked the differences in protein levels. With PEA it is possible to detect small differences in protein levels, which is of great importance when analysing the secretome from a few cells.
Finally, a number of proteins that we expected to detect were not identified. These proteins include heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha), tumour necrosis factor (TNF, formerly known as TNF-alpha), and C-X-C motif chemokine 13 (CXCL13) (17). The lack of detection of these proteins could have several explanations. Potentially, embryos that are arrested in development may discharge proteases that could degrade secreted proteins, making the comparison between blastocysts and arrested embryos more complicated.
One limitation of this study is that the samples were collected when ending embryo culture on day 6, meaning that the protein analysis reflects a pool of proteins secreted throughout that period of embryo development. Also, these results are true for cryopreserved embryos that have been cultured after thawing. Embryos cultured from fertilization until transfer to the woman might show other protein levels in the secretome, especially if cultured in one-step medium.
One could argue that this study is based on a small sample size. However, this study should be considered as a pilot study that needs to be repeated not only with a prospective study design, but with a larger sample size. The embryos were surplus embryos, but they were originally cryopreserved for transfer at a later stage, meaning that they were not discarded as a result of poor quality, or arrested early in development. Also, there have been reports that the culture media themselves contain undeclared proteins (49), and we did detect some of the proteins of the Multiplex Oncology I v296 × 96 panel in the culture media, but the proteins that we detected in the secretome were above background levels, meaning levels detected in culture media without any embryos.
A strength of this study is that the samples were of human origin, handled and cultured according to strict routines, and not based on animal studies. In addition, the secretome was detected in the culture media and not in the embryo per se. In addition, differences in protein levels were detected in a very small volume of culture medium, which is promising when searching for methods to be used in routine laboratories in order to improve the decision models for embryo transfer.
In conclusion, timing to development and the secretome seem to differ between embryos forming blastocysts of high quality compared with low quality, as well as arrested embryos. The findings are of relevance for embryo selection and might, hopefully, after extended investigations, be of importance in clinical practice where a theoretical specific protein pattern in combination with timing of development might help the embryologist to choose the most optimal embryo for transfer when performing IVF.
Biographies
Karin E Lindgren, PhD at the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, and Embryologist at the Reproduction Centre, Akademiska University Hospital, both in Uppsala, Sweden.
Fatma Gülen Yaldir, Embryologist at the Reproduction Centre, Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Julius Hreinsson, Embryologist and Laboratory Director at the Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan Holte, Physician and Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and founder of the Carl von Linné Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin Kårehed, Researcher at the Department of Women’s and Children's Health, Uppsala University, and Physician at the Oncology Department, Akademiska University Hospital, both in Uppsala, Sweden.
Inger Sundström, Professor at the Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, and Chief Physician at Women's Healthcare Department, Akademiska University Hospital, both in Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena Kaihola, Researcher at the Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena Åkerud, Professor at the Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Physician and Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and founder of GynHälsan, Uppsala, Sweden.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Family Planning Foundation in Uppsala, Sweden, the Swedish Research Council [grant number FF-2017-477], the Swedish Society of Medicine, and Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare, Stockholm, Sweden. None of the funding sources had any involvement in conducting this research or in the preparation of this article.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all couples who donate embryos to research, and the staff at the Centre for Reproduction, the Carl von Linné Clinic, and Olink Bioscience.
Disclosure statement
None of the authors reports any declarations of interest.
Arrested embryos (n = 17) | Blastocysts (n = 30) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of cells at start, median (range) | 4 (3–8) | 4 (3–8) | 0.573 |
Number of viable cells at start, median (range) | 3 (1–6) | 4 (3–8)** | 0.002 |
Percentage viable cells at start, median (range) | 75 (25–100) | 100 (71–100)*** | 0.001 |
P < 0.01 compared with arrested embryos, Mann–Whitney U test.
P < 0.001 compared with arrested embryos, Mann–Whitney U test.
References
- 1.Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Mocanu E, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1957–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gardner DK, Sakkas D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer–a review. Placenta. 2003;24(Suppl B):S5–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Krisher RL, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Omics as a window to view embryo viability. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:333–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gardner DK, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Treff NR. Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:727–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Noli L, Khalaf Y, Farcomeni A, et al. MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:225–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rodgaard T, Heegaard PM, Callesen H. Non-invasive assessment of in-vitro embryo quality to improve transfer success. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:585–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thompson JG, Brown HM, Sutton-McDowall ML. Measuring embryo metabolism to predict embryo quality. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Galliano D, Pellicer A. MicroRNA and implantation. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1531–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lundin K, Ahlstrom A. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability markers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:459–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katz-Jaffe MG, McReynolds S, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15:271–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dominguez F, Meseguer M, Aparicio-Ruiz B, Piqueras P, Quinonero A, Simon C. New strategy for diagnosing embryo implantation potential by combining proteomics and time-lapse technologies. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:908–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Diamond MP, Suraj V, Behnke EJ, Yang X, Angle MJ, Lambe-Steinmiller JC, et al. Using the Eeva Test adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:61–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.VerMilyea MD, Tan L, Anthony JT, Conaghan J, Ivani K, Gvakharia M, et al. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:729–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vaegter KK, Lakic TG, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:641–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rhenman A, Berglund L, Brodin T, Olovsson M, Milton K, Hadziosmanovic N, et al. Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:28–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Katz-Jaffe MG, McReynolds S. Embryology in the era of proteomics. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1073–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thouas GA, Dominguez F, Green MP, Vilella F, Simon C, Gardner DK. Soluble ligands and their receptors in human embryo development and implantation. Endocr Rev. 2015;36:92–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hathout Y. Approaches to the study of the cell secretome. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2007;4:239–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kawamura K, Chen Y, Shu Y, Cheng Y, Qiao J, Behr B, et al. Promotion of human early embryonic development and blastocyst outgrowth in vitro using autocrine/paracrine growth factors. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hardarson T, Van Landuyt L, Jones G. The blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(Suppl 1):i72–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lundberg M, Eriksson A, Tran B, Assarsson E, Fredriksson S. Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Björkesten J, Bucht Thorsen S, Ekman D, et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Motato Y, de los Santos MJ, Escriba MJ, Ruiz BA, Remohi J, Meseguer M. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:376–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hwu YM, Chen CP, Li SH, Chen PW, Lee RK, Fleming S. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1830–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharkey AM, Dellow K, Blayney M, Macnamee M, Charnock-Jones S, Smith SK. Stage-specific expression of cytokine and receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in human preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:974–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Herubel F, El Mouatassim S, Guerin P, Frydman R, Menezo Y. Genetic expression of monocarboxylate transporters during human and murine oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Zygote. 2002;10:175–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Muramatsu T. Basigin (CD147), a multifunctional transmembrane glycoprotein with various binding partners. J Biochem. 2016;159:481–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tang Y, Kesavan P, Nakada MT, Yan L. Tumor-stroma interaction: positive feedback regulation of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) expression and matrix metalloproteinase-dependent generation of soluble EMMPRIN. Mol Cancer Res. 2004;2:73–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ding NZ, He CQ, Yang ZM. Quantification of basigin mRNA in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos by competitive RT-PCR. Zygote. 2002;10:239–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee CL, Lam MP, Lam KK, Leung CO, Pang RT, Chu IK, et al. Identification of CD147 (basigin) as a mediator of trophoblast functions. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2920–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Igakura T, Kadomatsu K, Kaname T, Muramatsu H, Fan QW, Miyauchi T, et al. A null mutation in basigin, an immunoglobulin superfamily member, indicates its important roles in peri-implantation development and spermatogenesis. Dev Biol. 1998;194:152–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vrijsen KR, Maring JA, Chamuleau SA, Verhage V, Mol EA, Deddens JC, et al. Exosomes from cardiomyocyte progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells stimulate angiogenesis via EMMPRIN. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:2555–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qu P, Qing S, Liu R, Qin H, Wang W, Qiao F, et al. Effects of embryo-derived exosomes on the development of bovine cloned embryos. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0174535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Machtinger R, Laurent LC, Baccarelli AA. Extracellular vesicles: roles in gamete maturation, fertilization and embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:182–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krussel JS, Casan EM, Raga F, Hirchenhain J, Wen Y, Huang HY, et al. Expression of mRNA for vascular endothelial growth factor transmembraneous receptors Flt1 and KDR, and the soluble receptor sflt in cycling human endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:452–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jurisicova A, Antenos M, Varmuza S, Tilly JL, Casper RF. Expression of apoptosis-related genes during human preimplantation embryo development: potential roles for the Harakiri gene product and Caspase-3 in blastomere fragmentation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9:133–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Prins JR, Gomez-Lopez N, Robertson SA. Interleukin-6 in pregnancy and gestational disorders. J Reprod Immunol. 2012;95:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Seshagiri PB, Vani V, Madhulika P. Cytokines and blastocyst hatching. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75:208–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Haouzi D, Dechaud H, Assou S, Monzo C, de Vos J, Hamamah S. Transcriptome analysis reveals dialogues between human trophectoderm and endometrial cells during the implantation period. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1440–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shore VH, Wang TH, Wang CL, Torry RJ, Caudle MR, Torry DS. Vascular endothelial growth factor, placenta growth factor and their receptors in isolated human trophoblast. Placenta. 1997;18:657–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Granato T, Porpora MG, Longo F, Angeloni A, Manganaro L, Anastasi E. HE4 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;446:147–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jodar M, Sendler E, Krawetz SA. The protein and transcript profiles of human semen. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363:85–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lu TY, Lu RM, Liao MY, Yu J, Chung CH, Kao CF, et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule regulation is associated with the maintenance of the undifferentiated phenotype of human embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:8719–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ng VY, Ang SN, Chan JX, Choo AB. Characterization of epithelial cell adhesion molecule as a surface marker on undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28:29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caballero-Campo P, Dominguez F, Coloma J, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Pellicer A, et al. Hormonal and embryonic regulation of chemokines IL-8, MCP-1 and RANTES in the human endometrium during the window of implantation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:375–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dominguez F, Galan A, Martin JJ, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Hormonal and embryonic regulation of chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR4, CCR5 and CCR2B in the human endometrium and the human blastocyst. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9:189–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wong C, Chen AA, Behr B, Shen S. Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:120–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dyrlund TF, Kirkegaard K, Poulsen ET, Sanggaard KW, Hindkjaer JJ, Kjems J, et al. Unconditioned commercial embryo culture media contain a large variety of non-declared proteins: a comprehensive proteomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2421–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]