Enzyme replacement therapy in India: Lessons and insights

“Extreme remedies are very appropriate for extreme diseases”—Hippocrates. This philosophy has been epitomized by the “bench to bedside” success story of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). LSDs are a group of rare inborn errors of metabolism which are progressive, devastating multisystem disorders impairing growth, vision, ambulation, cardiac, or pulmonary function, causing debilitating bone and joint disease and invariably attenuating life span.[1] Each disorder is a result of a deficiency of any one of the 50 lysosomal enzymes, activator proteins, or membrane transport proteins.[2] Incidence of LSDs in India is not known; however, it is 1 in 5000–8000 live births in the United States, Europe, and Australia.[3] Globally, the most common LSDs with an incidence of 1 in 60,000–120,000 are Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, and mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type I.[4]

Before 1990, treatment was palliative, although bone marrow transplant was performed for several LSDs since 1980s with variable results.[5] Hope for treatment of LSDs became a reality with development of ERT. In the early 1970s, Brady et al., at the National Institute of Health, USA, were the first to successfully demonstrate clinical proof of efficacy of ERT by administration of purified human placental glucocerebrosidase intravenously in a 15-year-old and a 51-year-old patient with Gaucher disease.[6] This placenta-derived product was the first ERT to be marketed in 1991 as alglucerase.

Currently, ERT is manufactured using the DNA recombinant technology and is available commercially for 10 LSDs [Table 1].[7,8] This rapid stride is because of (i) the Orphan Drugs Act of 1983 in the United States, which provided pharmaceutical companies economic incentives to develop therapeutic products for rare diseases[9] and (ii) development of disease-specific knock-out mouse or animal models such as Japanese quail for Pompe disease and cat and dog for MPS type I.[8]

Table 1.

Current globally marketed ERT products

Disease	Product	Company	US FDA* approval/EU EMA† approval	Treatment in India	Dose/frequency (IV infusion)	Approximate annual cost (INR) - 10 kg child
Gaucher	Imiglucerase	Sanofi-Genzyme	1994/1997	2002	60 units/kg/EOW‡	40 lakhs
	Velaglucerase α	Shire HGT	2010/2010	2014	60 units/kg/EOW	70 lakhs
	Taliglucerase α	Protalix	2012/not approved	No information	60 units/kg q EOW	No information
Fabry	Agalsidase β	Sanofi-Genzyme	2003/2001	2005	1 mg/kg EOW	20 lakhs
	Agalsidase α	Shire HGT	Not approved/2001	2014	0.2 mg/kg EOW	20 lakhs
Pompe	Alglucosidase α	Sanofi-Genzyme	2006/2006	2008	20 mg/kg EOW	49 lakhs
MPS§ I	Laronidase	Sanofi-Genzyme	2003/2003	2006	0.58 mg/kg weekly	46 lakhs
MPS II	Idursulfase	Shire HGT	2006/2007	2014	0.5 mg/kg weekly	1 crore
MPS IVA	Elosulfase α	BioMarin	2014/2014	No information	2 mg/kg weekly	1.3crores
MPS VI	Galsulfase	BioMarin	2005/2006	2017	1 mg/kg weekly	1.1 crore
MPS VII	Vestronidase α	Ultragenyx	November 2017	Not available	4 mg/kg EOW	No information
Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency	Sebelipase α	Alexion	2015/2015	Not available	1-3 mg/kg weekly	3.2 crores
Neuronal ceroidlipofuscinosis type 2	Cerliponase α	BioMarin	2017/2017	Not available	300 mg EOW Intraventricular	4.7 crores

*FDA: Food and drug administration, ^†EMA: European Medicines Agency, ^‡EOW: Every other week, ^§MPS: Mucopolysaccharidosis

Enzyme Replacement Therapy in India

The first publication of ERT was from BARC Hospital, Mumbai, which described a 5-year-old boy who started receiving human placenta-derived alglucerase (Ceredase^®) since 1999.[10] Limited production of alglucerase because of limited availability of human placentae spurred the development of a DNA recombinant product analog of human β-glucocerebrosidase, imiglucerase.[11] Subsequently in the year 2002, patients who were initially being treated with alglucerase were transitioned to imiglucerase therapy.

Procuring ERT in the early days was a lengthy process involving obtaining approval from manufacturer through charitable initiative, gathering documents including a prescription (countersigned by a doctor in government health service), certificate from the treating physician and a “P” license from the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), for import of drugs for personal use. Since the year 2015, patients can fill Form 12A online (SUGAM web portal, https://cdscoonline.gov.in/CDSCO/Drugs_Personal) to get the import license (Form 12-B) and obtain the custom duty exemption certificate from DGHS.

ERT for diseases other than Gaucher disease was introduced in India in the ensuing years [Table 1]. Of these products, imiglucerase, agalsidase β, laronidase, and alglucosidase α already have marketing authorization from DGHS, whereas application for registering velaglucerase α, agalsidase β, and idursulfase are in the process. Major centers having expertise in administering ERT are situated in Bengaluru (Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health & Center for Human Genetics), Chennai (Fetal Care Research Foundation), Hyderabad (Rainbow Children's Hospital), Kochi (Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences), Lucknow (Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences), Mumbai (KEM Hospital and Jaslok Hospital), and New Delhi (AIIMS and Sir Ganga Ram Hospital). Indian patients access ERT through charitable initiatives of manufacturers and clinical trials. Few affected children of central and state government organization employees, namely, those working in armed forces, paramilitary forces, police, and government-owned public sector undertakings are now getting ERT as their expenses are being borne by these organizations. Three manufacturers are providing ERT through compassionate access programs in India: Sanofi-Genzyme through India Charitable Access Program (INCAP), Shire HGT's charitable access program in India in partnership with Direct Relief [a non-governmental organization (NGO)], and Protalix Therapeutics. In the year 2007, Sanofi-Genzyme constituted the Indian Medical Advisory Board (IMAB) whose board members are international physicians of repute, 10 local physicians from centers across India, and representatives of Sanofi-Genzyme to review applications for ERT made to INCAP, decide and prioritize eligibility for ERT, oversee ERT administration, and make recommendations for diagnostic evaluations and clinical monitoring of patients. Eligibility for ERT is decided by objective disease-specific inclusion and exclusion criteria based on published international guidelines and recommendations. Members of IMAB have recently published guidelines for ERT for Gaucher disease in India.[12]

In the year 2011, Nagral et al. published preliminary experience of treating 25 patients of Gaucher disease with imiglucearse from five Indian centers.[13] In eight patients treated for a mean period of 2.5 years, the hemoglobin increased by 2.2 g/dL, 50% had normal platelet count, and liver and spleen size decreased to one-third of the baseline size.[13]

In 2017, 240 patients with LSDs received ERT through the initiative of various charitable organizations, namely, (i) the INCAP; 121 patients with LSDs—65 Gaucher disease, 20 MPS I, 13 Fabry disease, and 23 Pompe disease; (ii) Shire HGT's charitable access program; 69 patients with LSDs—35 Gaucher disease (including 7 who got velaglucerase α as post-trial access), 27 MPS II, and 7 Fabry disease; and (iii) Protalix; 5 patients with Gaucher disease received taliglucerase α. In addition, 43 children of central and state government organization employees received ERT.

From 2007 to 2012, a phase III clinical trial of velaglucerase α was conducted for patients with Gaucher disease at KEM Hospital, Pune, and AIIMS, New Delhi, allowing them free access to ERT.[14]

Experience with Enzyme Replacement Therapy at KEM Hospital, Mumbai

Success stories

In 2001, alglucerase was started on a 7-year-old splenectomized girl with severe hematological, visceral, and skeletal manifestations of Gaucher disease requiring several packed cell and platelet transfusions. Subsequently, there was complete amelioration of all manifestations and she continues to be compliant and healthy on 11 years of therapy. Over the years, ERT has been initiated in 19 patients with LSDs, of which 12 continue to receive ERT [Table 2]. In our experience, hematological response has been timely and none of the patients subsequently required blood transfusion or splenectomy. However, these patients did not attain optimal therapeutic goals for reduction in hepatosplenomegaly, normalization of bone mineral density, and growth in the recommended time frame.[15] Despite ERT, skeletal deformities (kyphoscoliosis and pectus carinatum) progressed in type III Gaucher disease. Nevertheless, ERT has transformed lives for several of these patients with Gaucher disease who are now able to pursue their academic ambitions, seek employment as professionals, and even get married [Table 2]. However, in a few patients we are encountering rare or unusual complications such as development of gaucheromas (“pseudotumors”) which are a challenge to tackle.

Table 2.

Summary of ERT experience at KEM Hospital, Mumbai

Patients	Place of residence/distance (by road) from infusion center	Age		Interval: diagnosis & initiation of ERT	Duration of ERT (up to Dec 2017)	Outcome
		Diagnosis	Initiation of ERT
Gaucher disease: Non-neuronopathic (formerly type I)
1	Panvel, Maharashtra/~ 40 kms	4 years	11 years 6 months	7 years 6 months	17 years 9 months	MBA, working as an accountant
2	Dombivali, Maharashtra/~ 40 kms	5½ years	7 years 3 months	21 months	11 years (Eliglustat from January 2012)	2nd year Masters (Commerce) student
3	Solapur district, Maharashtra/~ 380 kms	20 months	33 months	13 months	9 years 11 months	7th standard student
4	Jalgaon district, Maharashtra/~ 360 kms	11½ years	11 years 9 months	3 months	4 years 9 months	Discontinued ERT
5	Mumbai	10½ years	10½ years	Nil	9 years 2 months	2nd year Bachelor (Engineering) student
6	Mumbai	15 years	15½ years	6 months	7 years 11 months	Graduate, MBBS
7	Jamnagar, Gujarat/~ 800 kms	37 months	39 months	2 months	7 years 11 months	5th standard student
8	Kolhapur district, Maharashtra/~ 480 kms	32 months	10 years 7 months	7 years 11 months	One dose	Expired due to disease related complications: Interstitial lung disease, hepatopulmonary syndrome and intracranial hemorrhage
9	Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra/~ 25 kms	6 years	6½ years	6 months	3 years 2 months	Discontinued ERT
10	Satara district, Maharashtra (migrated to Mumbai for treatment)	2 years	2 years 8 months	8 months	5 years	Junior KG (Interim 2 years of irregular treatment)
11	Ulhasnagar, Maharashtra/~ 50 kms	21 months	3½ years	21 months	6 months	Not attending school
Gaucher disease: Neuronopathic (formerly type III)
1	Satara district, Maharashtra (migrated to Mumbai for treatment)	16 months	17 months	1 month	8 years 11 months	Repeating 3rd year in 1st standard, (Interim 2 years of irregular treatment)
2	Sangli district, Maharashtra/~ 390 kms	18 months	37 months	19 months	8 years 2 months	5th standard student
3	Wardha, Maharashtra/~ 730 kms	1 year	3 years 10 months	2 years 10 months	10 years 10 months	7th standard student
Hunter disease (Mucopolysaccharidosis type II)
1	Mumbai	3½ years	5½ years	2 years	38 months	2nd standard student
Maroteaux-Lamy disease disease (Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI)
1	Mumbai	4 years	8½ years	4½ years	1 month	3rd standard student
Pompe disease (classical, infantile)
1	Mumbai	4 months	7½ months	3½ months	3½ months	Expired
2	Mumbai	7 months	9 months	2 months	2 months	Expired
3	Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra/~ 25 kms	3 months	5 months	2 months	2 months	Discontinued ERT, No follow up
4	Dombivali, Maharashtra/~ 40 kms	3 months	7 months	4 months	20 months	Expired 4 months after ERT was discontinued

Enzyme replacement therapy's flip side

Because ERT needs to be administered as weekly or alternate weekly intravenous infusions, this involves daycare hospital admission. Life-long ERT therapy is definitely intrusive.[7] In addition, several are outstation patients [Table 2] and their visits entail significant travel expenses, school and work absenteeism, and loss of wages for parents. Often these factors contribute to poor compliance. Hence after establishing disease control, we encourage patients to receive their ERT infusions in their hometown. Unfortunately, this outsourcing of ERT treatment has at times led to sub-optimal monitoring and undetected co-morbidities such as anemia and vitamin D deficiency. We also encountered difficulty in maintaining stringent temperature control (2°C–8°C) while transporting ERT vials to remote villages, which was often further compounded because of their erratic electricity supply. Because of this logistic limitation, we have had to discontinue outsourcing ERT infusions for a few patients. Two patients dropped out because of family problems. One adult patient with a LSD on ERT had to abandon traveling abroad for higher studies because of inability to continue receiving ERT through compassionate access outside India.

Patients with LSDs have to receive ERT life-long. As ERT does not cross the blood–brain barrier, it does not reverse central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities.[8] In addition, it is less efficient in ameliorating manifestations in bones, cartilage, lymphnodes, skeletal muscles, cornea, heart valves, and lungs.[7,8] Established organ damage, namely, bone or visceral infarcts in Gaucher disease, and chronic kidney disease or strokes in Fabry disease do not reverse with ERT.[6,8] In classical Pompe disease, symptoms of cardiorespiratory insufficiency develop in the first few months after birth and these patients become ventilator-dependent and succumb by 1 year of age.[16] Hence, timely diagnosis and initiation of ERT in these conditions is vital.

In European countries and in the United States, ERT is easily available to all afflicted individuals either through their National Health Services or through health insurance.[17,18] Improved awareness about LSDs among Indian doctors, availability of diagnostic tests, and setting up of treating centers has resulted in increased numbers of patients with LSDs being diagnosed. However, in our country procuring ERT to treat all diagnosed patients is currently not possible because of its prohibitive cost [Table 1]. Because our health insurance policies do not cover for LSDs, only a few patients get access to ERT. Charitable LSDs programs (mentioned earlier) can recruit only a few patients annually as per their prioritization policies. At our center, only 12, of the 37, confirmed patients with Gaucher disease could get access to ERT.[15]

Overcoming challenges of enzyme replacement therapy

Development of IgG antibodies that reduce efficacy during ERT is a known phenomenon.[19] This is least frequent with velaglucerase α and highest with alglucosidase α.[8] High frequency of antibody response in patients with Pompe disease receiving alglucosidase α is attributed to their cross-reacting immunologic material (CRIM) status.[8,20] In CRIM-negative patients with Pompe disease, their immune system perceives the ERT protein as foreign resulting in production of sustained high antibody titers to alglucosidase α which mandates prophylactic immunomodulation (with rituximab, methotrexate, and intravenous immunoglobulin) to abrogate the immune response.[8,20]

In contrast to Gaucher disease and Hunter disease, treating classical Pompe disease with ERT at our center has been disappointing [Table 2]. Mortality has been 100% in classical Pompe disease in spite of ERT, probably a consequence of initiating treatment late or because of innate disease severity. Another reason for poor response to ERT could have been undetected CRIM-negative status in our cohort of patients with classical Pompe disease. Consequentially, now genotype is obtained in every patient with Pompe disease to predict CRIM status.[8,20] Two infants having Pompe disease were approved for ERT through INCAP; however, parents declined treatment probably because of complexity and life-long commitment of therapy.

ERT infusions require close clinical monitoring to preempt allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis). In patients receiving galsulfase and idursulfase, we use low-protein-binding 0.2 μm in-line filters for infusion along with premedication (antihistamine) administered 30 min before infusion. Apart from occasional mild febrile reactions with imiglucerase and idursulfase infusions, we have not observed any other adverse events.

The promise of easy enzyme replacement therapy access in India: What the future holds?

In recent years, individual patients and the “Lysosomal Storage Disorders Support Society of India” (LSDSS, a patient advocacy group) have filed writ petitions in the Honorable High Courts in New Delhi, Bengaluru, Chennai, and Hyderabad to direct the government to provide ERT free of cost to patients with LSDs. As an outcome of these litigations, ERT is now being funded for a few patients by the Employee State Insurance Corporation and by the State Government of Karnataka. The landmark judgment in the Mohammed Ahmed versus Union of India case [W.P. (C) 7279/2013] (http://www.delhihighcourt.nic.in/dhc_case_status_oj_list.asp?pno=685222) has led to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to recently draft the National Policy for Treatment of Rare Diseases.[21] Two initiatives already taken include (i) creating a corpus fund of INR 100 crores for funding treatment of rare diseases (including LSDs) and (ii) development of a web-based online portal for applications for treatment funding. Patients can now email their application for funding to <publichealth2@yahoo.com> the Section Officer, Rare Disease Cell, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Long-term goals for rare diseases include to (i) establish national registries and conduct epidemiologic studies to know their prevalence, (ii) facilitate research to improve diagnostic modalities, (iii) encourage indigenous drug companies to manufacture therapeutic drugs, and (iv) measures for price control including waiving import duty for ERT.

In conclusion, although LSDs are individually rare, several are currently treatable. ERT is currently the standard of care for selected LSDs and proceeds in parallel with supportive multidisciplinary medical and surgical interventions. The foremost prerequisite is a confirmed diagnosis. Early diagnosis is the key for optimum outcome. Although cost of ERT is exorbitant, there are avenues to access ERT in India. Government funding of ERT in India is anticipated to be introduced in a phased manner for selected ERTs in the near future.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mamta Muranjan was Principal Investigator for study entitled “A Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, multi-national, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of once daily versus twice daily dosing of Genz-112638 in patients with Gaucher disease type 1 who have demonstrated clinical stability on a twice daily dose of Genz-112638” which was funded by Sanofi-Genzyme. The grant was deposited with the Diamond Jubilee Society Trust of Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital. She also serves as a Member of Sanofi-Genzyme's Indian Medical Advisory Board, a post that does not involve any remuneration.