Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2018 Oct 11;12(10):e0006866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006866

Estimating the economic impact of canine rabies to Viet Nam 2005–2014

Stephanie A Shwiff 1, Vienna R Brown 2,*, Thu Trang Dao 3, Julie Elser 1, Hoang Xuan Trung 4, Nguyen Ngoc Tien 5, Nguyen Thi Huong 6, Nguyen Thi Thanh Huong 7, Arthorn Riewpaiboon 8, Karina Ernst 1, Steven Shwiff 9, David Payne 10
Editor: Charles E Rupprecht11
PMCID: PMC6199002  PMID: 30307947

Abstract

The global economic impact of canine rabies has been estimated by several studies. Asia bears a disproportionate burden of this zoonosis due to high levels of human deaths and rates of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), but low investment in preventative dog vaccination. The same factors that cause rabies to burden much of Asia are also present in Viet Nam. This study estimated the economic burden of canine rabies in a societal perspective including direct and indirect cost of rabies in dogs, livestock, and humans. Using data collected from personal interviews, published literature, published and supplementary reports, and primary data collection, we estimated the economic impact of canine rabies in Viet Nam over a ten year period (2005–2014). We incorporated the direct and indirect costs for PEP, dog vaccination efforts, livestock losses, and disability adjusted life years (DALYs) into the analysis. General findings from this analysis indicated that over the 10 year study period, the total economic impact of canine rabies was over $719 million USD. The largest portion of impacts (92%) were made up of PEP-related costs. Canine rabies created between 36,560 and 45,700 DALYs, measured in years of life lost (YLL). A total of 914 human deaths were reported over the study period. Deaths/100,000 people were 0.11, which is lower than the reported level for Asian countries. The cost per dog vaccinated was $1.75 USD. Our results indicate that canine rabies impacts in Viet Nam are consistent with the burden elsewhere reported in Asia, with large expenditures on PEP and very small investments in dog vaccination.

Author summary

With few exceptions, canine rabies is endemic in developing countries. The mortality rate of rabies approaches 100%. However, disease is preventable via the timely administration of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following a rabid animal bite. Additionally, canine rabies can be controlled in dog populations through mass vaccination. Economics drive the majority of policy and decision making and as such, a robust understanding of the cost of prevention and control methods is useful for the development and implementation of rabies management strategies. The majority of afflicted individuals are poor and reside in rural regions, where knowledge of rabies is minimal and access and affordability of PEP are limited. A greater emphasis on mass dog vaccination is a cost effective method of eliminating canine rabies at the source, which decreases the need for human PEP and reduces the burden of human mortality within vulnerable populations.

Introduction

Canine rabies is an economically unique zoonosis, as most of its associated costs do not result from illness in the infected individual, but rather are the consequences of human deaths and efforts to prevent the disease in humans, livestock, and companion animals. This pattern of costs reflects two basic facts: the case fatality rate of rabies in humans is nearly 100%, and the disease is preventable through timely post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with rabies immune globulin (RIG) and multiple doses of rabies vaccine [1]. Unfortunately, in most developing countries, RIG is often unavailable [2].

Rabies exposures in humans or livestock result in economic impacts associated with vaccination or death. Because rabies patients die quickly, and there is no effective therapy, the cost of illness is relatively small, especially in the developing world. In contrast, the major direct costs arising from factors such as PEP and livestock deaths have been characterized in numerous studies [36]. Resultant of the fatality of rabies and the efficacy of PEP, many individuals who are at very low risk of developing the disease still seek PEP, regardless of the recommendation of health professionals [7]. In addition to the aforementioned direct costs, canine rabies also has indirect costs, including vaccination of livestock and companion animals and laboratory-based surveillance with diagnostic testing of animals suspected of rabies, both of which are beyond the scope of this manuscript [810].

Other impacts of rabies on the broader economy can be captured by examining changes in different sectors that result from the direct and indirect impacts of the disease [11]. Knobel and colleagues (2005) estimated global monetary expenses resulting from rabies at $695 million annually [12], while Anderson and Shwiff (2015) updated and expanded this study to include the value of human life lost for a total global estimate of approximately 69,000 lives lost annually and a global burden of $1.2 billion USD [13]. Hampson and colleagues (2015) estimated that approximately 59,000 people die globally from rabies and, consistent with other studies, the majority of canine rabies burden falls on Africa and Asia [14].

This study examined the economic impact of canine rabies in Viet Nam for a ten year period (2005–2014) using data collected from personal interviews, published literature, published and supplementary reports, and primary data collection (during a site visit in March 2016). Rabies is endemic in the Vietnamese dog population with about 100 human cases reported annually. During the study period, an average of over 400,000 PEPs were administered each year. Overall, canine rabies in Viet Nam appears consistent with the general rabies burden characterized by other Asian countries, in that a considerable amount of human deaths occur, a significant amount of PEP is administered, dog vaccination coverage is relatively low, and there is not a national comprehensive enforced dog vaccination campaign to eliminate canine rabies [6, 13, 1516]. Most of the exposures, PEP, and rabid dogs occur in northern, more rural, provinces. In addition, many of the victims are children from poor communities, which is also consistent with canine rabies exposure worldwide [17]. In 2010, a large canine rabies outbreak occurred and 165 suspected rabid dogs were found in 17 communes of the Lao Cai province [1819]. This resulted in a total of 156 locals being bitten and given PEP, with three deaths. In 2011, another canine rabies outbreak was identified when nine rabid dogs from five communes in three districts of the Lao Cai province were diagnosed, biting 22 locals, which resulted in one death.

Common metrics to measure the impact of canine rabies were incorporated into this analysis, including the direct and indirect costs for PEP, dog vaccination efforts, livestock losses, and disability adjusted life years (DALYs). The results from this analysis detail the level of burden created by canine rabies in Viet Nam, examine whether canine rabies impacts in Viet Nam are consistent with other Asian countries, and determine if savings can be realized by reducing the impacts of PEP. Importantly, this study focuses exclusively on canine rabies. However, wildlife species, including bats, may be a reservoir for rabies in Viet Nam, although potential impacts associated with other animals are beyond the scope of this analysis.

In Viet Nam, rabies in dogs is a notifiable disease to the Department of Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, which reports to the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). There is a general surveillance and monitoring program as well as a dog vaccination program. However, like many dog vaccination programs in Asian countries, rabies control through dog vaccination and management is underfunded and rabies remains a neglected disease. Identification of the current economic costs inflicted by rabies and the cost of control measures are imperative to building widespread investment and support for canine rabies elimination.

Methods

Estimation of the economic impact of canine rabies to Viet Nam from 2005 to 2014 required coalescing information from several sources on the direct and indirect impacts of disease. Specifically, estimates of human mortality, direct and indirect medical costs, direct and indirect costs of PEP, dog vaccinations, and livestock mortality were required, along with the costs associated with each. Here we relied on estimates from numerous sources (Table 1). The National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology (NIHE) in Viet Nam provided data related to annual human mortality, number of PEPs administered, and the percentage of individuals that received RIG when receiving PEP. A significant amount of information for this analysis was sourced from a report entitled, “Economic analysis of a hypothetical intensified rabies prevention and control program in Vietnam” [20S1 Text]. This report provided an economic analysis of the impact of rabies in Viet Nam from 2008–2009, which served as a tool to advocate for greater investment in rabies prevention and control activities. Data sourced from this report include PEP vaccine administration cost/dose (excluding vaccine cost), direct non-medical plus indirect costs of PEP per case, direct and indirect medical costs of a rabid patient, indirect costs of rabid patient per case, vaccine costs, RIG costs, vaccinator or animal health worker costs, and dog owner costs (travel time, etc). All unit costs are presented in 2017 USD. We assumed that all human patients received intramuscular (IM) vaccination and that no costs were associated with adverse reactions to the vaccine. Based on information obtained from NIHE, only a small percentage of patients (9%) receive rabies immunoglobulin (RIG), which is relatively consistent with Knobel et al., 2005, who assumed that 6% of patients receive RIG in Asia. The Department of Animal Health (DAH) provided information on the total annual dog population and the number of dogs vaccinated. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) provided the cost associated with dog vaccines and the average slaughter weight for cattle, buffalo, and pigs. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) provided annual livestock population numbers and livestock price per kilogram. To determine the rate of rabies occurrence in livestock, information was sourced from Hampson et al., 2015.

Table 1. Data type, values (2017 USD), availability, and sources used in this analysis.

Data type Value (USD) Data available Source
Human
Human population variable all years World Bank
Life expectancy variable all years World Bank
Number of human deaths variable all years NIHE
Number of PEPs variable all years NIHE
PEP vaccine administration cost/dose (excl. vaccine cost) 8 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Direct non-medical + indirect costs of PEP/case 111 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Direct medical cost of rabid patient 58 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Direct non-medical costs of rabid patient 179 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Indirect cost of rabid patient/case 976 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
RIG cost 44 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Vaccine (verorab) cost 8 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
% of RIG/PEP 9% NIHE
Canine
Dog population variable 2011–2014 Dept. of Animal Health (S2 Text)
Number of dogs vaccinated variable 2011–2014 Dept. of Animal Health (S2 Text)
Cost of dog vaccine 0.45 FAO
Vaccinators/Animal health worker costs 1.07 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Dog owner cost (travel time, etc) 0.23 Riewpaiboon, 2010 (S1 Text)
Livestock
Livestock populations variable all years MARD
Rate of livestock rabies variable all years Hampson et al. 2015
Livestock price/kg variable even years MARD
Slaughter weight variable even years FAO, Livestock sector brief

Human case data

The human population and quantity of PEP administration associated with rabies in Viet Nam during the study period is provided in Table 2. An overwhelming majority of PEP administrations in Viet Nam were resultant from exposure to a known or suspect rabies positive dog; however, rabies can be transmitted by a number of other species (e.g. bats) and this exposure would also require PEP. The non-canine related PEPs are believed to comprise a negligible number of PEP administrations annually and thus, all PEP administrations in Viet Nam are included below.

Table 2. Human population and PEPs administered in Viet Nam between 2005 and 2014.

Year Human population # of PEPs administered
2005 83,106,300 585,251
2006 84,136,800 567,173
2007 84,220,000 450,023
2008 85,120,000 380,450
2009 86,020,000 280,453
2010 86,930,000 303,150
2011 87,840,000 342,731
2012 88,770,000 400,308
2013 89,710,000 371,153
2014 90,319,600 394,979

Dog population

The dog population in Viet Nam was estimated to range between 6 and 8 million during the study period. Reliable data regarding the dog population was only available from the DAH (S2) between 2011 and 2014 (Table 3). To derive estimates of the dog population and the number of dogs vaccinated for 2005 through 2010, we used several estimation methods. Earlier studies estimated the dog population at approximately 6 million for years prior to 2011 [21, personal communication]. Therefore, to achieve a dog population of approximately 8.5 million by 2011 we anchored 2005 (the initial study year) at 6 million and then grew the dog population at a steady rate of 0.5 million to achieve the 2011 population. Vaccination coverage is simply the share of the total dog population that is comprised of vaccinated dogs. Reliable estimates of dog vaccination coverage were only available between 2011 and 2014. To estimate vaccination coverage for 2005 through 2010, we extrapolated values with a linear time trend and applied those values to the unknown years.

Table 3. Dog population and canine vaccine coverage in Viet Nam between 2005 and 2014.

Year Dog population # of infected provinces # of dogs vaccinated Vaccination coverage*
2005 6,000,000 996,300 17%
2006 6,500,000 1,297,660 20%
2007 7,000,000 1,632,610 23%
2008 7,500,000 5 2,001,150 27%
2009 8,000,000 2 2,403,280 30%
2010 8,500,000 8 2,839,000 33%
2011 8,585,856 5 3,244,595 38%
2012 8,437,861 8 3,223,263 38%
2013 8,239,877 10 3,643,674 44%
2014 8,195,809 23 3,850,391 47%

*These values are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

Livestock

One of the most critical animal species considered in this analysis is livestock. In Viet Nam, important livestock populations that are impacted by canine rabies include cattle, pigs, and buffalo. Reliable data on the prevalence of canine rabies in livestock could not be obtained through any Vietnamese source including the DAH, MARD, or NIHE. Therefore, estimates regarding the impact of canine rabies to livestock were derived from Hampson et al., 2015. Through primary data collection for the purpose of estimating the global burden of canine rabies, Hampson et al., 2015, inferred a relationship between rabies in livestock (IL) and dog vaccination coverage (VC), as presented in Eq 1.

IL=0.0017*(1VC)9 (1)

It follows from Eq 1 that a lower level of vaccination coverage will lead to a higher incidence of rabies in livestock. Each of the three separate livestock species are considered for this analysis. There are no data to suggest that pigs, cattle, and buffalo would be exposed with different frequencies to rabid dogs, as such, the same rate of incidence was applied across all species. Information on the annual population of each species was obtained from the MARD for the study period and vaccination coverage in dogs was obtained from DAH (Table 3). Eq 1 was used to derive the IL to determine the number of dead livestock of each type (Table 4).

Table 4. Incidence of canine rabies and corresponding deaths in livestock between 2005 and 2014.

Year Rabies incidence in livestock Pigs (# head) # of dead pigs* Cattle (# head) # of dead cows* Buffalo (# head) # of dead buffalo*
2005 0.000332 23,421,871 7,768 5,540,700 1,838 2,922,155 969
2006 0.000229 26,855,330 6,152 6,510,794 1,492 2,921,051 669
2007 0.000156 26,560,651 4,137 6,724,703 1,047 2,996,415 467
2008 0.000104 26,701,598 2,779 6,337,746 660 2,897,734 302
2009 0.000068 27,627,729 1,885 6,103,322 416 2,886,602 197
2010 0.000044 27,373,149 1,200 5,916,251 259 2,913,388 128
2011 0.000024 27,055,900 642 5,436,600 129 2,712,000 64
2012 0.000022 26,494,000 592 5,194,200 116 2,627,800 59
2013 0.000009 26,261,400 233 5,156,700 46 2,559,500 23
2014 0.000006 26,761,600 151 5,234,300 29 2,511,900 14

*These values were rounded to the nearest whole number.

To estimate the total impacts associated with canine rabies in livestock the value of each species must be incorporated. The information regarding the average market prices associated with each livestock type was obtained from MARD. A national census is conducted every other year (even years) and the price per kilogram for meat from each species was derived from this survey. The market price for odd years was an average of the prior and subsequent even years where data were available.

Disease burden (DALYs)

Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are the sum of years of life lost (YLL) and years lost due to disability (YLD) and were calculated for each study year (t). YLLt was calculated by subtracting the average age of patients at death (31 years) from the life expectancy in Viet Nam (76 years) for each year of the study and multiplying by the number of reported deaths. The average age of patients at death was determined from three years of available data (2006, 2007, 2008). Ages were reported categorically, so the mean age at death was calculated by multiplying the mean age of each age category by the average number of deaths in that category over three years, summing and dividing by the average number of deaths per year. The median age at death falls between two age categories (15–24 years and 25–34 years) so is likely around 25 years. The low median age reflects the reality that rabies disproportionately affects children. As a sensitivity analysis, patients’ age at death was allowed to vary by five years to account for the categorical nature of the data (the range of all categories except the lowest and highest was ten years). Although the incubation period of rabies may be years, the time from onset of symptoms to death is just a few days. For this reason, YLD was assumed to be 0, meaning DALY = YLL.

Cost of prevention and control measures

The cost of prevention of human rabies includes the direct cost of administering PEP (which includes RIG in 9% of cases), costs of the vaccines, and direct non-medical and indirect costs of PEP (e.g. transportation, lost time from work, accommodation and meals, etc). Any pre-exposure prophylaxis costs are assumed to be negligible. Based on data derived from other similar countries, it was assumed that each patient receiving PEP was administered three doses of vaccine (Elser et al. 2018). The total cost of rabies in humans (TCRH) includes the variables that are listed in Table 5 and are incorporated into Eq 2.

Table 5. Variable definitions, data type, and values (2017 USD) used in this analysis.

Data type Variable Value
Human
Human population* POPH variable
Number of human deaths Deaths variable
Number of PEPs PEP variable
PEP vaccine administration cost/dose (excl. vaccine cost) PEPcost1 8
Direct non-medical + indirect costs of PEP/case PEPcost2 111
Direct medical cost of rabid patient Rabid1 58
Direct non-medical cost of rabid patient Rabid2 179
Indirect cost of rabid patient/case Rabid3 976
RIG cost RIGcost 44
Vaccine (verorab) cost HumanV 8
% of RIG/PEP 9% -
Canine
Dog population* POPD variable
Number of dogs vaccinated VD variable
Cost of dog vaccine DogV 0.45
Vaccinators/animal health worker costs Worker 1.07
Dog owner cost (travel time, etc) Owner 0.23
Livestock
Livestock populations (for each livestock type i) POPLi variable
Rate of livestock incidence IL variable
Livestock price/kg (for each livestock type i) PriceLi variable
Slaughter weight (for each livestock type i) WghtLi pigs = 81kg, cattle = 176kg, buffalo = 215kg

*Not used in any formula.

TCRH=PEP*(3*PEPcost1+PEPcost2+3*HumanV)+[(.09*PEP)*RIGcost]+[DEATH*(RABID1+RABID2+RABID3)] (2)

The total cost of rabies in dogs (TCRD) include the vaccine, salaries for the animal health workers, and the costs that fall to the dog owners (Eq 3).

TCRD=VD*(DogV+Worker+Owner) (3)

This study assumed that rabies only impacts three livestock species: cattle, buffalo, and pigs. The total cost of canine rabies impacts in livestock (TCRL) is the sum across livestock species at the applicable level of incidence for each livestock population priced at the average slaughter weight (Eq 4).

TCRL=Σi=1n[(POPLi*IL*PriceLi*WghtLi)] (4)

The total cost (TC) associated with rabies is the sum of the human, dog, and livestock components (Eq 5). The values were adjusted to 2017 USD and summed across all years and species.

TC=TCRH+TCRD+TCRL (5)

Results

Estimated disease burden

Over the ten-year period between 2005 and 2014, 25,539 pigs, 6,032 cattle, and 2,892 buffalo were estimated to have died from rabies. The total cost of lost livestock exceeded $10 million (Table 6).

Table 6. Annual cost (in 2017 USD) of rabies impacts in livestock (pigs, cattle, and buffalo) in Viet Nam from 2005 through 2014.

Pigs Cattle Buffalo
Year Cost/head # dead Total cost Cost/head # dead Total cost Cost/head # dead Total cost
2005 123 7,768 955,464 575 1,838 1,056,850 505 969 489,345
2006 128 6,152 787,456 621 1,492 926,532 569 669 380,661
2007 171 4,137 707,427 666 1,047 697,302 650 467 303,550
2008 213 2,779 591,927 709 660 467,940 728 302 219,856
2009 215 1,885 405,275 832 416 346,112 872 197 171,784
2010 226 1,200 271,200 985 259 255,115 1047 128 134,016
2011 274 642 175,908 1243 129 160,347 1287 64 82,368
2012 316 592 187,072 1469 116 170,404 1495 59 88,205
2013 310 233 72,230 1618 46 74,428 1769 23 40,687
2014 306 151 46,206 1771 29 51,359 2043 14 28,602
Total 4,200,165 4,206,389 1,939,074

Between 36,560 and 45,700 years of human life were lost due to rabies-caused deaths. Table 7 presents the DALYs which are equivalent to YLL as YLD is assumed to be 0.

Table 7. Human rabies deaths in Viet Nam and YLL or DALYs from 2005 to 2014.

Years of life lost (YLL)
Age at Death
Year Deaths 26 31 36
2005 84 4,200 3,780 3,360
2006 82 4,100 3,690 3,280
2007 131 6,550 5,895 5,240
2008 91 4,550 4,095 3,640
2009 68 3,400 3,060 2,720
2010 78 3,900 3,510 3,120
2011 110 5,500 4,950 4,400
2012 98 4,900 4,410 3,920
2013 105 5,250 4,725 4,200
2014 67 3,350 3,015 2,680
Total 914 45,700 41,130 36,560

A substantial number of lives were lost over the study period and it is likely that our estimate is an underrepresentation of the disease burden, primarily resultant from underreporting of rabies-related human deaths. Many reasons exist for underreporting, including an inability to diagnose rabies from the symptoms presented and a lack of verification of rabies positivity post-mortem. Examining the number of human deaths over the study period indicates that deaths tend to trend close to the average (91.4 per year). However, 2007 was the year with the most recorded deaths and 2014 tallied the fewest.

Utilizing the data on the number of rabies deaths, it is possible to determine the costs associated with patients infected with rabies, including medical and non-medical costs (Table 8). The average cost per human death over the ten years exceeded $1,200 USD.

Table 8. Costs (in 2017 USD) associated with human rabies deaths in Viet Nam from 2005 to 2014.

Year Direct medical cost of rabid patient Direct non-medical costs of rabid patient Indirect medical costs of rabid patient Total cost
2005 4,872 15,036 81,984 101,892
2006 4,756 14,678 80,032 99,466
2007 7,598 23,449 127,856 158,903
2008 5,278 16,289 88,816 110,383
2009 3,944 12,172 66,368 82,484
2010 4,524 13,962 76,128 94,614
2011 6,380 19,690 107,360 133,430
2012 5,684 17,542 95,648 118,874
2013 6,090 18,795 102,480 127,365
2014 3,886 11,993 65,392 81,271
Total 53,012 163,606 892,064 1,108,682

Estimated costs of prevention and control measures

For this analysis, rabies prevention is composed of two parts: prevention of rabies in dogs through vaccination and prevention of rabies in humans through PEP. During the study period, over 25 million dogs were vaccinated against rabies. After examining the costs associated with the prevention of rabies in dogs, the vaccinator/animal health worker costs composed the largest portion of total costs. Table 9 presents the costs of controlling rabies in dogs. The average cost of vaccinating a dog was $1.75 USD.

Table 9. Costs (in 2017 USD) of canine rabies prevention in Viet Nam between 2005 and 2014.

Year Number of dogs vaccinated Dog vaccine costs Vaccinator/animal health worker costs Dog owner costs Total
2005 996,300 448,335 1,066,041 229,149 1,743,525
2006 1,297,660 583,947 1,388,496 298,462 2,270,905
2007 1,632,610 734,675 1,746,893 375,500 2,857,068
2008 2,001,150 900,518 2,141,231 460,265 3,502,013
2009 2,403,280 1,081,476 2,571,510 552,754 4,205,740
2010 2,839,000 1,277,550 3,037,730 652,970 4,968,250
2011 3,244,595 1,460,068 3,471,717 746,257 5,678,041
2012 3,223,263 1,450,468 3,448,891 741,350 5,640,710
2013 3,643,674 1,639,653 3,898,731 838,045 6,376,429
2014 3,850,391 1,732,676 4,119,918 885,590 6,738,184
Total 25,131,923 11,309,365 26,891,157 5,780,342 43,980,864

After examining the costs of rabies prevention in humans, it is evident that the majority of the costs are a result of direct non-medical and indirect costs of PEP. Components of direct non-medical costs include costs to the patient and family due to transportation, meals, accommodation; time lost as a result of PEP; time lost by caregivers; and indirect costs of PEP, including cost of work absence. For this analysis, it was provided by NIHE that RIG is only given to approximately 9% of individuals that received PEP. Table 10 presents the costs of rabies prevention via PEP, with the average cost per PEP at $163 USD.

Table 10. Costs (in 2017 USD) of canine rabies prevention in humans in Viet Nam from 2005 through 2014.

Year Number of human PEPs Total vaccine cost/case RIG cost Vaccine admin cost/case Direct non-medical + indirect costs of PEP Total
2005 585,251 14,046,024 2,317,594 14,046,024 64,962,861 95,372,503
2006 567,173 13,612,152 2,246,005 13,612,152 62,956,203 92,426,512
2007 450,023 10,800,552 1,782,091 10,800,552 49,952,553 73,335,748
2008 380,450 9,130,800 1,506,582 9,130,800 42,229,950 61,998,132
2009 280,453 6,730,872 1,110,594 6,730,872 31,130,283 45,702,621
2010 303,150 7,275,600 1,200,474 7,275,600 33,649,650 49,401,324
2011 342,731 8,225,544 1,357,215 8,225,544 38,043,141 55,851,444
2012 400,308 9,607,392 1,585,220 9,607,392 44,434,188 65,234,192
2013 371,153 8,907,672 1,469,766 8,907,672 41,197,983 60,483,093
2014 394,979 9,479,496 1,564,117 9,479,496 43,842,669 64,365,778
Total 4,075,671 97,816,104 16,139,657 97,816,104 452,399,481 664,171,346

Total estimated average annual economic cost of rabies in Viet Nam

The total cost of rabies in Viet Nam from 2005 to 2014 was over $719 million in 2017 USD with 914 human lives lost and between 36,560 and 45,700 years of human life lost (Table 11).

Table 11. Total annual cost (in 2017 USD) of rabies in Viet Nam from 2005 through 2014.

Year Total cost of rabies prevention in humans Total cost of rabies patients Total cost of dog vaccination Total value of livestock lost Total Human deaths Years of life lost (YLL)*
2005 95,372,503 101,892 1,743,525 2,499,858 99,717,778 84 3,780
2006 92,426,512 99,466 2,270,905 2,091,252 96,888,135 82 3,690
2007 73,335,748 158,903 2,857,068 1,709,964 78,061,682 131 5,895
2008 61,998,132 110,383 3,502,013 1,279,648 66,890,175 91 4,095
2009 45,702,621 82,484 4,205,740 924,389 50,915,234 68 3,060
2010 49,401,324 94,614 4,968,250 660,557 55,124,745 78 3,510
2011 55,851,444 133,430 5,678,041 419,226 62,082,141 110 4,950
2012 65,234,192 118,874 5,640,710 445,507 71,439,282 98 4,410
2013 60,483,093 127,365 6,376,429 186,710 67,173,597 105 4,725
2014 64,365,778 81,271 6,738,184 127,113 71,312,346 67 3,015
Total 664,171,346 1,108,682 43,980,864 10,344,223 719,605,116 914 41,130

*This column represents the mean YLL based on the average patient age at death (31 years).

Discussion

The largest portion of rabies costs in Viet Nam are associated with PEP and only minimal expenditures are associated with dog vaccination (Table 11). Livestock losses are an insignificant portion of total costs. However, it may be the case that livestock losses are concentrated regionally and may significantly impact individual producers. Costs associated with PEP and livestock losses are potentially preventable costs or costs that would be eventually eliminated or reduced given the elimination or reduction of canine rabies impacts in Viet Nam. These costs would represent the savings associated with increased dog vaccination and decreased incidence of PEP in humans.

A substantial number of DALYs are lost, which is the result of a combination of the number of human deaths and the younger average age associated with individuals that succumb to canine rabies. Over the 10-year study period, 914 human deaths from rabies were reported. A myriad of reasons for this number of deaths have been implicated, including some individuals using traditional medicine and other homeopathic remedies as opposed to proper PEP, other individuals improperly assume that a bite from the household pet dog will not result in rabies, children often do not recognize the risk of rabies and fail to alert an adult to a dog bite, and individuals with very limited resources do not seek care as they cannot afford to do so.

Average dog vaccination coverage is less than half of the dogs in Viet Nam, which is an insufficient level of coverage to achieve canine rabies elimination. Likely the dog vaccination coverage is similar to other canine rabies endemic countries in Asia, in that coverage levels are higher in urban and suburban areas and lower in rural areas. This only exacerbates canine rabies impacts as most of the human and livestock exposures happen in rural areas as a result of a lower vaccination rate among dogs in these areas.

This study is potentially subject to limitations associated with the reliability of the data acquired. Some of the values used in this manuscript are from other publications or worldwide entities which maintain global records (ie: the FAO). However, other values are derived from supplementary reports or internal documents provided in-country. In each case, it is difficult to ascertain the accuracy of the values. Importantly, global human rabies incidence is believed to be grossly underreported with some data suggesting that the true rabies incidence in humans is upwards of 100 times greater than that reported [12]. This study uses the best available data where possible and estimates unreported values using the closest proxy. As such the results and conclusions of this work are equally reliable as other published reports on global human rabies incidence and associated impacts.

Comparing annual disease burden against prevention and control measures reveals that Viet Nam is consistent with other rabies endemic countries in Asia as more money is spent on PEP than preventing human rabies through dog vaccination. This is very evident when examining costs associated with PEP and dog vaccination. PEP costs compose 92% of the burden of rabies in Viet Nam whereas dog vaccination costs are only 6% of the costs or burden associated with the disease. Examining the costs per dog vaccinated against the cost per PEP reveals the same trend. Prevention cost per PEP is 93 times greater than the costs per dog vaccinated. Table 12 depicts the total dog vaccination costs at the actual vaccination coverage rate as compared to the dog vaccination costs at the optimal 70% dog vaccination [5]coverage rate over the study period. Attaining the 70% dog vaccination rate needed to quell canine rabies transmission between 2005 and 2014 would result in total dog vaccination expenditures of $94 million which is just 14% of the total cost associated with human rabies and rabies prevention costs. These values clearly indicate that the most cost effective control of canine rabies in humans is through coordinated veterinary public health campaigns that prevent human rabies as opposed to suppressing disease through PEP administration.

Table 12. Costs (in 2017 USD) associated with human rabies prevention in dogs as compared to rabies prevention and death at the actual dog vaccination coverage rate and at the recommended 70% dog vaccination coverage.

Year Total dog vaccination costs Total human rabies costs and rabies prevention costs Dog vaccination as a % of human costs Total dog vaccination costs at 70% coverage 70% dog vaccination as a % of human costs
2005 1,743,525 95,474,395 2% 7,350,000 8%
2006 2,270,905 92,525,978 2% 7,962,500 9%
2007 2,857,068 73,494,651 4% 8,575,000 12%
2008 3,502,013 62,108,515 6% 9,187,500 15%
2009 4,205,740 45,785,105 9% 9,800,000 21%
2010 4,968,250 49,495,938 10% 10,412,500 21%
2011 5,678,041 55,984,874 10% 10,517,674 19%
2012 5,640,710 65,353,066 9% 10,336,380 16%
2013 6,376,429 60,610,458 11% 10,093,849 17%
2014 6,738,184 64,447,049 10% 10,039,866 16%
Total 43,980,864 665,280,028 7% 94,275,269 14%

The results of this study indicate that canine rabies impacts in Viet Nam are consistent with how these impacts have been characterized in Asia, specifically that there are large expenditures on PEP and very small expenditures on dog vaccination. Canine rabies elimination requires a level of dog vaccination coverage that exceeds 70% [5]. To achieve this, Viet Nam should increase expenditures on dog vaccination efforts while maintaining or increasing PEP coverage. A comprehensive dog vaccination program that targets rural areas that have lower rates of vaccination coverage combined with bite prevention programs and management of free-roaming dogs will have a substantial impact on the number of bites and potential human exposures. In poorer rural areas, incentives to vaccinate dogs, such as free vaccination, may be a prudent scheme to increase participation in dog vaccination efforts.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and the Ministry of Health crafted a report outlining a national program toward rabies control and elimination between 2017 and 2021 [22]. This document summarizes the dog vaccination coverage goals which have been categorized for urban areas, lowland, midland and mountainous regions, and rural and remote areas. This report indicates that future dog vaccination coverage targets will increase over time across all regions. However, the highest dog vaccination coverage rates are projected for 2021. Challenges to obtain high levels of dog vaccination coverage may include the prevalence of inaccessible dogs, the inability or unwillingness of owners to bring dogs in for vaccination, the lack of information about dog populations, the lack of canine rabies surveillance and diagnostic capabilities, and insufficient resources from veterinary services [23]. Nevertheless, the benefits of eliminating the disease are tremendous.

Supporting information

S1 Text. The Riewpaiboon 2010 report, entitled ‘Economic analysis of a hypothetical intensified rabies prevention and control program in Vietnam’ is included as Table 8 provides all the values that were used in our manuscript that were derived from this report.

The conversion rate used from Vietnamese dong (VND) to USD was from 2009 (17,801 VND/$1 USD); the values were then grown to 2017 USD.

(DOC)

S2 Text. The data provided in-country by the Department of Animal Health, entitled ‘Canine rabies data’ is included as it provides information on the dog population and vaccination coverage.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the OHP Secretariat who launched this research initiative and facilitated the collaboration; Maho Urabe from the WHO; Nguyen Thuy Hang from the FAO; and Tran Hong Cuc and Ryan Wallace from the CDC.

Data Availability

The human population and life expectancy data was derived from World Bank. The National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology provided data on the number of human deaths, the number of PEPs administered, and the percent of PEP administrations that also included RIG. An unpublished report, Riewpaiboon 2010, provided data on the direct and indirect costs associated with dog bites, PEP, and rabid patients as well as some expenditures associated with canine vaccination. The Department of Animal Health provided information on the dog population and the number of dogs vaccinated in Viet Nam. The FAO provided information on the cost of dog vaccines. The livestock populations and the livestock price/kg was informed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. The rate of livestock rabies incidence was informed by Hampson et al 2015 and the FAO Livestock sector brief informed slaughter weight. All of this information is provided in Table 1.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization (WHO). Rabies: Guide for post-exposure prophylaxis. 2018. <http://www.who.int/rabies/human/postexp/en/>.
  • 2.Elser JL, Hatch BG, Taylor LH, Nel LH, Shwiff SA. Towards canine rabies elimination: Economic comparisons of three project sites. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018; 20: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shwiff SA, Sterner RT, Jay MT, Parikh S, Bellomy A, Meltzer MI, Rupprecht CE, Slate D. Direct and indirect costs of rabies exposure: A retrospective study in southern California (1998–2002). J Wildl Dis. 2007; 43: 251–257. 10.7589/0090-3558-43.2.251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sterner RT, Meltzer MI, Shwiff SA, Slate D. Tactics and economics of wildlife oral rabies vaccination, Canada and the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009; 15: 1176–1184. 10.3201/eid1508.081061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zinsstag J, Durr S, Penny MA, Mindekem R, Roth F, Menendez Gonzalez S, Maissengar S, Hattendorf J. Transmission dynamics and economics of rabies control in dogs and humans in an African city. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2009; 106: 14996–15001. 10.1073/pnas.0904740106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shwiff SA, Hampson K, Anderson A. Potential economic benefits of eliminating canine rabies. Antiviral Res. 2013; 98: 352–356. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rupprecht CE, Briggs D, Brown CM, Franka R, Katz SL, Kerr HD, Lett Sm, Levis R, Meltzer MI, Schaffner W, Cieslak PR. Use of a reduced (4-dose) vaccine schedule for post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent human rabies. MMWR. 2010; 59: 1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blanton JD, Palmer D, Rupprecht CE. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2009. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010; 237: 646–657. 10.2460/javma.237.6.646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Narrod C, Zinsstag J, Tiongco M. A one health framework for estimating the economic costs of zoonotic diseases on society. EcoHeal. 2012; 9: 150–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Anderson A, Shwiff SA, Gebhardt K, Ramirez AJ, Shwiff S, Kohler D, Lecuona L. Economic evaluation of vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) rabies prevention in Mexico. Tranbound Emerg Dis. 2014; 61: 140–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Diao X, Alpuerto V, Nwafor M. Economy wide impact of avian flu in Nigeria–A dynamic CGE model analysis. HPAI Research Brief No. 15. 2009.
  • 12.Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fevre EM, Meltzer MI, Miranda MEG, Shaw A, Zinsstag J, Meslin FX. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005; 83: 360–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anderson A, Shwiff SA. The cost of canine rabies on four continents. Tranbound Emerg Dis. 2015; 62: 446–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T, Sambo M, Kieffer A, Attlan M, Barrat J, Blanton JD, Briggs DJ, Cleaveland S, Costa P, Freuling CM, Hiby E, Knopf L, Leanes F, Meslin FW, Metlin A, Miranda ME, Muller T, Nel LH, Recuenco S, Rupprecht CE, Schumacher C, Taylor L, Natal Vigilato MA, Zinsstag J, Dushoff J. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PloS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9: e0003709 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tenzin NKD, Ward MP. Review of rabies epidemiology and control in South, South East, and East Asia: Past, present, and prospects for elimination. Zoonoses Publ Heal. 2012; 59: 451–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mai LTP, Dung LP, Tho NTT, Quyet NT, Than PD, Mai NDC, Thuy NTT, Lien NTP, Dung NA. Community knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward rabies prevention in North Vietnam. Appl Res Eval. 2010; 31: 21–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Taylor LH, Nel LH. Global epidemiology of canine rabies: Past, present, and future prospects. Vet Med: Res Rep. 2015; 6: 361–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.SEARS. The South-East Asia Dog Rabies Elimination Strategy. 2013.
  • 19.ASEAN. ASEAN Rabies Elimination Strategy. 2015.
  • 20.Riewpaiboon A. Economic analysis of a hypothetical intensified rabies prevention and control program in Vietnam. S1 Text. 2010.
  • 21.Department of Animal Health (DAH). Rabies in dogs. S2 Text. 2015.
  • 22.MARD. National Program for Rabies Control and Elimination in Viet Nam in the Period from 2017 to 2021. 2016.
  • 23.Lembo T, Hampson K, Kaare MT, Ernest E, Knobel D, Kazwala RR, Haydon DT, Cleaveland S. The feasibility of canine rabies elimination in Africa: Dispelling doubts with data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4: e626 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Text. The Riewpaiboon 2010 report, entitled ‘Economic analysis of a hypothetical intensified rabies prevention and control program in Vietnam’ is included as Table 8 provides all the values that were used in our manuscript that were derived from this report.

The conversion rate used from Vietnamese dong (VND) to USD was from 2009 (17,801 VND/$1 USD); the values were then grown to 2017 USD.

(DOC)

S2 Text. The data provided in-country by the Department of Animal Health, entitled ‘Canine rabies data’ is included as it provides information on the dog population and vaccination coverage.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The human population and life expectancy data was derived from World Bank. The National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology provided data on the number of human deaths, the number of PEPs administered, and the percent of PEP administrations that also included RIG. An unpublished report, Riewpaiboon 2010, provided data on the direct and indirect costs associated with dog bites, PEP, and rabid patients as well as some expenditures associated with canine vaccination. The Department of Animal Health provided information on the dog population and the number of dogs vaccinated in Viet Nam. The FAO provided information on the cost of dog vaccines. The livestock populations and the livestock price/kg was informed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. The rate of livestock rabies incidence was informed by Hampson et al 2015 and the FAO Livestock sector brief informed slaughter weight. All of this information is provided in Table 1.


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES