Skip to main content
Ethnicity & Disease logoLink to Ethnicity & Disease
. 2018 Oct 18;28(4):555–560. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.4.555

Review: Partner Support and Physical Activity among Mexican American Women

Neomie C Congello 1,, Deborah Koniak-Griffin 2
PMCID: PMC6200310  PMID: 30405300

Abstract

Objective

Global recommendations on physical activity for noncommunicable disease prevention can be promoted using partner support strategies among women of Mexican descent and other ethnicities.

Design/Methods

This systematic review utilized a multifaceted ecological approach by focusing comprehensively on community, individual, and social factors influencing physical activity. PubMed, SAGE Publications, EBSCO, ResearchGate, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar search engines were used to find research on physical activity, with inclusion criteria of Mexican American women, aged ≥ 18 years, comprising at least 50% of study population sizes.

Main Outcome Measures

An initial search of 232 articles with subsequent searches from reference lists led to selection of a mixture of qualitative (3), mixed methods (3), and intervention (1) studies reporting partner support for physical activity as perceived by women.

Results

Primarily, studies have conceptualized physical activity as leisure time activities. Few studies have considered multiple ecological factors in examining influences of physical activity among women. Importantly, how women perceive support for physical activity received from partners has been shown to influence their levels of activity.

Conclusions

Conceptualization of physical activity restricted only to leisure time eliminates other domains that a broader definition of the term encompasses. Future studies are needed to investigate partner support influences on the overall physical activity of Mexican American women within a larger ecological context. Careful attention to partner support for physical activity engagement can help ameliorate and prevent chronic diseases both nationally and around the world.

Keywords: Mexican American, Women, Physical Activity, Partner Support

Introduction

Across the world, women reportedly engage in less physical activity (PA) than men.1 This gender disparity is particularly important since PA is a core health indicator recommended for noncommunicable disease prevention.2 High prevalence rates of physical inactivity exists among women (almost 50%) and men (40%) in countries of the Americas (eg, Columbia, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, the United States [US], and Mexico).3 A growing body of evidence suggests that Mexican American women (MAW) do not meet the current physical activity (PA) recommendations of 150 minutes of moderate activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week.4,5 MAW are considered a subset of the larger Hispanic/Latino population,6 which is projected to increase to 128.8 million by the year 2060.7 A reason for concern is decreased PA level compounded by high prevalence rates of obesity among MAW increases their risk for cardiovascular disease, diabetes and other conditions.8 Reports from the1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey revealed notably lower leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among Mexican American and non-Hispanic Black adults when compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts.9 The global definition for LTPA refers to PA done during leisure time (eg, walking, swimming, dancing); whereas, overall PA includes all types of activities performed for occupation, transportation, household duties, sports, play, games, and planned exercise.10 In particular, engagement in LTPA has been challenging for Latino/Hispanic women,11,12 with a great majority of MAW (74%) lacking participation.8

Global recommendations for both leisure and non-leisure activities are promoted within the context of the community, individual and family.10 Current evidence has identified use of a comprehensive ecological framework focusing on environmental, individual and social factors as appropriate in examining influences of family support in PA studies involving overweight/obese Hispanic and African American women.13 Similarly, a broad social contextual framework that includes physical environment and social support factors has been shown to be useful in targeting complex PA and diet-related health behaviors in older Mexican adults.14 In a systematic review involving mixed ethnicities including African American and Hispanic/Latino adults, studies that used social support as an interventional strategy have reported increased PA compared with those who did not.15 Importantly, among recommended strategies for increasing PA levels, having an accountability partner (eg, spouse) has been distinctly emphasized.16 The purpose of this review is to explore influences of perceived partner support on PA among MAW.

Methods

A multifaceted ecological framework was used to examine studies at the individual, social and community levels. Peer reviewed articles were retrieved from different research databases and analyzed, resulting in selection of a range of qualitative, intervention and mixed methods studies that met our search criteria.

Literature Search

For this systematic review, PubMed, SAGE Publications, EBSCO, ReseachGate, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search engines were used to access peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1992 to 2018. An initial search was performed using the keywords: partner, spouse, husband, social support, physical activity, exercise, Mexican American women, Mexico, Latino, Latina, and Hispanic; this search yielded 232 articles. Next, a reference librarian was consulted to run a search of the same keywords using truncation to capture different forms of the terms. After several attempts, the search led to seven articles.

Selection of Retrieved Articles

Peer-reviewed research studies and systematic reviews on physical activity were selected based on inclusion criteria: 1) at least 50% of the study population comprised women identified as Mexican descent; 2) aged ≥ 18 years; and 3) without any reported chronic illnesses. Articles including the terms, partner, husband, spouse, or identified as living together were chosen for the review while all non-English studies, conference proceedings, and dissertations were excluded. Initially, only five articles were found. Reference lists of the primary authors were examined leading to two additional articles that met inclusion criteria.

Study Quality and Data Extraction

Both authors of this review determined study quality based on eligibility criteria. Two key elements of study quality were that the research included demographic data on ethnic background of participants and examined partner support for PA as perceived by women. The first author performed data extraction, followed by review and verification by the second author. Data extracted included first author, purpose, characteristics, study design, and key findings of studies. Information was logged into the tables after discrepancies in the studies were checked, clarified, and discussed.

Results

For this review, we identified 3 qualitative, 1 intervention, and 3 mixed methods studies. Collectively, these studies have provided specific and meaningful insights on the influences of perceived partner support on PA levels among Hispanic, Latino and MAW. Quantitative studies involving MAW have used a complex ecological approach to investigate cultural, social, economic and environmental influences on PA.17 However, few qualitative studies have used this approach encompassing community, social support, and individual factors to better understand how women perceive support received from their partners particularly for LTPA.18,19 As a typical example, women mentioned that not being able to drive to exercise facilities (community factor) and depending on their husbands to drive them (instrumental support) have deterred them from being physically active.18

Study Populations

For this systematic review, studies that were included had study population sizes ranging from 7 to 269 women (Table 1). Although the term Latina was used to broadly categorize the cultural backgrounds of women in most studies,18-22 the majority of women (83%) in each study were either born in Mexico or self-identified as Mexican American. Other specified countries of origin included Columbia, Dominican Republic,18 Puerto Rico, Cuba,20 El Salvador, Honduras,18,22 and Costa Rica.22 Only one study comprised a homogenous group of MAW.23 Two studies consisted primarily of MAW (95% and 96%, respectively),19,21 but did not report other countries of origin. Across studies, the majority of women spoke Spanish.19-23 Women ranged widely in age from aged ≤ 40 years23 to aged ≤ 66 years.21 Additionally, one qualitative study reported age range of 40 to 79 years20 and one qualitative study reported age range of 40 to 80 years,22 although the mean and median age for women in both studies was aged 55-56 years, respectively.

Table 1. Perceived partner support reported in selected studies, 1992-2018.

Study Purpose Characteristics Study design Key findings
Parra-Medina & Hilfinger Messias17 Determine willingness, readiness/ability to regularly participate in LTPA Texas; 69 women; mean age = 44.3 Intervention study; Formative assessments using focus groups Husband’s jealousy; wives restricted from leaving home, lack of time; occupation and household duties
Evenson et al18 Understanding social, cultural, environmental and policy factors associated with PA North Carolina; 49 participants; mean age = 32 Qualitative; focus groups Exercise/sports are for men; time/energy constraints from household, childcare and occupation; depend on husbands for transportation
Martinez et al19 Examine facilitators of an barriers to PA San Diego, California; 25participants Qualitative study Husbands disapprove of exercise outfits; men play sports; time constraints
Juarbe et al20 Describe barriers and benefits to PA engagement 143 participants; age 40-79 Mixed methods; semistructured interview Unable to drive to exercise facilities; time/role constraints; lack of spousal support
Skowron et al21 Identify factors influencing LTPA Illinois; 269 participants, age 18-66 Mixed-methods study Women should stay at home; motivated by exercising with husband
Ramirez et al22 Examine attitudes, knowledge and behaviors on exercise/nutrition Texas; 75 participants, age 40-80 Qualitative study Wives discouraged from exercising; husband’s jealousy; neighborhood safety
Juarbe et al23 Examine behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, PA and physical fitness Northern California; 51 immigrants; age 21-40 Mixed-methods study Discouraged from exercising; not supported by husbands and partners; seen as harmful to reproduction

PA, physical activity; LTPA, leisure time physical activity.

The majority of studies directed attention to PA performed in gyms or exercise facilities and walking.18-20,22,23 Although some studies focused on different aspects of PA referred to as PA domains, few individual studies21,24 and systematic reviews25 concentrated on overall PA. Current knowledge promotes walking, climbing stairs, and playing sports as ways to incorporate exercise into daily lives,4 expanding on an earlier definition of “planned,” “structured,” and “purposeful” bodily movements in a single domain. Recommendations for increased PA in a variety of domains (ie, home, work, leisure time, and transportation) suggest inclusion to attain overall PA.26 Recently, emphasis has been placed on transportation as an important, though often omitted, component in PA research.27 Yet, no quantitative study was found to include partner support within the context of an ecological approach to simultaneously examine multiple factors (ie, individual/cultural, social, and community/environmental levels) that influence engagement in LTPA.

Partner Support

Across studies, data pertaining to partner support for PA were obtained using a variety of measures in research employing qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs. The measures used in one community-based participatory research study included formative assessments, with semi-structured interviews conducted by community leaders, and focus group data collected prior to implementation of an LTPA intervention led by promotoras (ie, lay health educators).17

Individual-level

Women were interviewed individually in studies using open-ended questions to examine benefits and barriers to being physically active,20 and to identify attitudes related to beliefs about health and exercise.23 Women reported lack of time to engage in PA,18,20,22 and the traditional gender role of women staying at home and caring for the family as the most common barriers.18,20,22 The wide age range (18-80 years) of women represented identifies gender role as a cultural expectation that extends beyond the child-rearing years.

Social-level

Several studies had conducted focus groups to assess barriers to and facilitators of PA at the social level.18,19,22 Overall, current evidence reveals that lack of support for PA received from partners has strongly influenced PA engagement among MAW.17-23 Specific emerging themes pertaining to partner support for PA are that exercise is not for women,18,22,23 disapproval of exercise outfit,19 and jealousy among men.17,22

Community-level

Facilitators of and barriers to PA at the community level were examined through focus groups.18,19,22 Findings revealed that cultural influences are compounded by concerns about neighborhood safety,17,18 and lack of transportation.18,20 While some studies, involving primarily women born in Mexico (88%) found that concern about neighborhood safety was a community-level barrier18; other studies with larger samples of MAW (95%) did not report this finding.21 These inconsistencies in findings suggest that variations in MAW’s perceptions of neighborhood characteristics may contribute to differences in PA reported across studies.

Discussion

In exploring the influence of partner support of PA among MAW, most studies identified in this review employed qualitative and mixed methods designs, using focus groups and interviews as the main data collection strategy. Although conceptualization of PA varies across studies, most studies focused on exercise and excluded commonly engaged activities, such as housework, gardening, etc. Emphasis placed on exercise across studies makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding partner support for overall PA that includes a broader range of activities among MAW. Nonetheless, studies examining exercise among MAW in this review provide insights on partner support that may be beneficial in understanding other kinds of physical activities. The American Heart Association recommendations of three bouts of daily PA involving any type of bodily movements lasting 10 to 15 minutes to burn calories26 indicates acceptability of a variety of activities. Exclusion of any of the activity domains (eg, occupation and transportation) can lower the quantity of overall PA reported to a great degree,25 consequently contributing to an inaccurate assessment of activity levels for cardiovascular health benefits as inadequate.

Studies with samples of Hispanics/Latinos that reported no significant differences in PA between married and unmarried women28 had participants who were largely from non-Mexican American origin (65% Dominican/ Columbian). However, similar studies conducted primarily with MAW have shown high levels of PA among younger women,24,29 and married women.29 More current evidence revealing Central American/Mexican American men and women as having the highest level of occupation-related PA when compared with those of other Hispanic/Latino backgrounds30 indicates importance of including activities in this domain.

Findings generated primarily from studies involving focus groups showed that partner support is a key influence on PA among MAW. Similar results were also reported by women during one-on-one interviews.20,23 Comparatively, value placed on earlier studies targeting family vs individually focused diet and PA interventions for weight reduction31 still remains relevant decades later. Additionally, the effectiveness of partner support through action control using text messages as an effective strategy for increasing PA levels has recently been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial conducted in Switzerland involving couples.32 It is then likely that partners of MAW may be more receptive toward a family-based vs an individual-based approach targeting lifestyle behavioral changes. Interestingly, performance of housework promoted as a way to foster higher PA, and walking advocated as easy, safe, convenient and cost-effective in meeting recommended PA levels33 may be more culturally acceptable to partners of MAW when presented within the context of gender role expectations. Engagement in PA when presented to women within the context of their caregiving role can create opportunities for the family to spend time together while they walk in protected areas (eg, park or mall). Importantly, PA involving the entire family may offer promise as a strategy because it encourages women to remain with their families, thereby decreasing potential risk for jealousy when women leave their homes. Further, cultural values of women caring for their children, family and partners are strengths and motivating factors for women to better care for themselves so that they can adequately care for others.

The extensive use of qualitative data in this review does not infer causation, and findings about partner support cannot be interpreted as a direct cause for low levels of PA among MAW, although the importance of multi-dimensional influences on PA are highlighted. The domain of PA focused exclusively on exercise in the studies reviewed, without investigation of other types (ie, household, transportation, and occupation) indicating that further research is needed to examine overall PA of MAW. This is particularly important given that partner support may be higher in other PA domains (eg, household and occupation) than LTPA. Certainly, the relationship between partner support and PA can be better understood by utilizing a broader overall PA definition in future studies.

Quantitative studies including interview guides are needed to increase understanding of the influence of partner support on overall PA. Additionally, studies involving male partners can contribute greatly by gaining their perspectives on PA engagement of MAW leading to important and meaningful insights beneficial for future nursing intervention programs to enhance PA among MAW. Targeting social support factors previously established as important for maximizing success in PA programs34,35 can help partners feel more empowered to support PA among MAW. Finally, based on community insights describing the complexities of environmental, individual and social level influences on PA,13 strong emphasis should be placed on identifying partner support as a vital component of social support that can be further investigated.

Conclusions and Implications

The well-documented link between reported low PA levels and concerns regarding cardiovascular and similar health conditions among MAW drive the need for improved social support strategies to counteract increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Despite limited quantitative research examining support for PA received from partners in relation to PA engagement, sufficient qualitative knowledge exists demonstrating relevance of this important relationship. However, variations in PA definitions and inconsistent conceptualization across studies when examining partner support create difficulties in drawing accurate conclusions. Consequently, future studies should clearly define and measure overall PA while investigating influences of partner support using comprehensive ecological measures.

References

  • 1. World Health Organization Prevalence of Insufficient Physical Activity, 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity/en/index1.html
  • 2. World Health Organization Global Reference List of 100 Core Health Indicators (plus health-related SDGs), 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/indicators/2018/en/
  • 3. World Health Organization Physical Inactivity: A Global Public Health Problem. 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/
  • 4. American Heart Association American Heart Association Recommendations for Physical Activity in Adults. 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/HealthyLiving/PhysicalActivity/FitnessBasics/American-Heart-Association-Recommendations-for-Physical-Activity-in-Adults_UCM_307976_Article.jsp#WnPrbOdG3Iw
  • 5. Chrisman M, Daniel CR, Chow WH, Wu X, Zhao H. Acculturation, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with compliance with physical activity recommendations in the Mexican-American Mano A Mano cohort. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e008302. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. United States Census Bureau Hispanic Origin. 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/topics/population/hispanic-origin/about.html
  • 7.United States Census Bureau Projections Show a Slower Growing, Older, more Diverse Nation a Half Century from Now. News Release, 2016. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-243.html
  • 8. American Heart Association Stroke among Hispanics. 2017. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from http://www.strokeassociation.org/STROKEORG/AboutStroke/UnderstandingRisk/Stroke-Among-Hispanics_UCM_310393_Article.jsp#.W3XyZ8InZhE
  • 9. Dai S, Carroll DD, Watson KB, Paul P, Carlson SA, Fulton JE. Participation in types of physical activity among US adults – National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(6)(suppl 1):S128-S140. 10.1123/jpah.2015-0038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. 2018. August 16, 2018 from http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/
  • 11. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Andersen RE, Carter-Pokras O, Ainsworth BE. Race/ethnicity, social class and their relation to physical inactivity during leisure time: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(1):46-53. 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00105-1 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00105-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Neighbors CJ, Marquez DX, Marcus BH. Leisure-time physical activity disparities among Hispanic subgroups in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1460-1464. 10.2105/AJPH.2006.096982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mama SK, McCurdy SA, Evans AE, Thompson DI, Diamond PM, Lee RE. Using community insight to understand physical activity adoption in overweight and obese African American and Hispanic women: a qualitative study. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(3):321-328. 10.1177/1090198114557128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Doubova SV, Sánchez-García S, Infante-Castañeda C, Pérez-Cuevas R. Factors associated with regular physical exercise and consumption of fruits and vegetables among Mexican older adults. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):952. 10.1186/s12889-016-3628-2 10.1186/s12889-016-3628-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mama SK, McNeill LH, McCurdy SA, et al. Psychosocial factors and theory in physical activity studies in minorities. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(1):68-76. 10.5993/AJHB.39.1.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. American Heart Association Healthy for Good. 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from https://healthyforgood.heart.org/move-more/articles/daily-tips-to-help-keep-your-family-active
  • 17. Parra-Medina D, Hilfinger Messias DK. Promotion of physical activity among Mexican-origin women in Texas and South Carolina: an examination of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors. Quest. 2011;63(1):100-117. 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483668 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Evenson KR, Sarmiento OL, Macon ML, Tawney KW, Ammerman AS. Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity among Latina immigrants. Women Health. 2002;36(2):43-57. 10.1300/J013v36n02_04 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Martinez SM, Arredondo EM, Perez G, Baquero B. Individual, social, and environmental barriers to and facilitators of physical activity among Latinas living in San Diego County: focus group results. Fam Community Health. 2009;32(1):22-33. 10.1097/01.FCH.0000342814.42025.6d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Juarbe T, Turok XP, Pérez-Stable EJ. Perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity among older Latina women. West J Nurs Res. 2002;24(8):868-886. 10.1177/019394502237699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Skowron MA, Stodolska M, Shinew KJ. Determinants of leisure time physical activity participation among Latina women. Leis Sci. 2008;30(5):429-447. 10.1080/01490400802353174 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ramirez AG, Chalela P, Gallion K, Velez LF. Energy balance feasibility study for Latinas in Texas: a qualitative assessment. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(4):A98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Juarbe TC, Lipson JG, Turok X. Physical activity beliefs, behaviors, and cardiovascular fitness of Mexican immigrant women. J Transcult Nurs. 2003;14(2):108-116. 10.1177/1043659602250623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Martinez SM, Ayala GX, Patrick K, Arredondo EM, Roesch S, Elder J. Associated pathways between neighborhood environment, community resource factors, and leisure-time physical activity among Mexican-American adults in San Diego, California. Am J Health Promot. 2012;26(5):281-288. 10.4278/ajhp.100722-QUAN-249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tovar M, Walker JL, Rew L. Factors associated with physical activity in Latina women: A systematic review. West J Nurs Res. 2018;40(2):270-297. 10.1177/0193945916681004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. American Heart Association No Time for Exercise? Here are 7 Easy Ways to Move More! 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from: https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness
  • 27. Sallis JF. New evidence for the role of transportation in health. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1(2):e38-e39. 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30008-1 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30008-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marquez B, Dunsiger SI, Pekmezi D, Larsen BA, Marcus BH. Social support and physical activity change in Latinas: Results from the Saemos Saludables. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015;2:351-357. 10.1007/s40615-014-0080-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wilbur J, Chandler PJ, Dancy B, Lee H. Correlates of physical activity in urban Midwestern Latinas. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25(3)(suppl 1):69-76. 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00167-3 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00167-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Arredondo EM, Sotres-Alvarez D, Stouten­berg M, et al. Physical activity levels in US Latino/Hispanic adults: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(4):500- 508. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. amepre.2015.08.029 PMID:26597505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31. Cousins JH, Rubovits DS, Dunn JK, Reeves RS, Ramirez AG, Foreyt JP. Family versus individually oriented intervention for weight loss in Mexican American women. Public Health Rep. 1992;107(5):549-555. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Berli C, Stadler G, Shrout PE, Bolger N, Scholz U. Mediators of physical activity adherence: results from an action control intervention in couples. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(1):65-76. 10.1007/s12160-017-9923-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. American Heart Association Physical Activity around the House. 2018. Last accessed August 16, 2018 from: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/HealthyLiving/HealthyKids/HowtoMakeaHealthyHome/Physical-Activity-Around-the-House_UCM_310806_Article.jsp#.WsXEg8jmauU
  • 34. Perez A, Fleury J, Keller C. Review of intervention studies promoting physical activity in Hispanic women. West J Nurs Res. 2010;32(3):341-362. 10.1177/0193945909351300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Coleman KJ, Farrell MA, Rocha DA, et al. Readiness to be physically active and self-reported physical activity in low-income Latinas, California WISEWOMAN, 2006-2007. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E87. 10.5888/pcd9.110190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ethnicity & Disease are provided here courtesy of Ethnicity & Disease Inc.

RESOURCES