Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018 Sep 22;28(21):3431–3435. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.09.029

Clickable Photoaffinity Ligands for the Human Serotonin Transporter Based on the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (S)-Citalopram

Nageswari Yarravarapu a, Laura Geffert a, Christopher K Surratt a,c, Michael Cascio b, David J Lapinsky a,*
PMCID: PMC6200329  NIHMSID: NIHMS1508059  PMID: 30266542

Abstract

To date, the development of photoaffinity ligands targeting the human serotonin transporter (hSERT), a key protein involved in disease states such as depression and anxiety, have been radioisotope-based (i.e., 3H or 125I). This letter instead highlights three derivatives of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) (S)-citalopram that were rationally designed and synthesized to contain a photoreactive benzophenone or an aryl azide for protein target capture via photoaffinity labeling and a terminal alkyne or an aliphatic azide for click chemistry-based proteomics. Specifically, clickable benzophenone-based (S)-citalopram photoprobe 6 (hSERT Ki = 0.16 nM) displayed 11-fold higher binding affinity at hSERT when compared to (S)-citalopram (hSERT Ki = 1.77 nM), and was subsequently shown to successfully undergo tandem photoaffinity labeling-biorthogonal conjugation using purified hSERT. Given clickable photoprobes can be used for various applications depending on which reporter is attached by click chemistry subsequent to photoaffinity labeling, photoprobe 6 is expected to find value in structure-function studies and other research applications involving hSERT (e.g., imaging).

Keywords: citalopram, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin transporter, photoaffinity labeling, click chemistry

Table of Contents Graphic

graphic file with name nihms-1508059-f0005.jpg


The human serotonin transporter (hSERT) is a clinically significant neurotransmitter-sodium symporter (NSS) protein targeted by therapeutic medicines (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) for treatment of anxiety and depression) and addictive drugs (e.g., cocaine and amphetamines), towards affecting serotonergic neurotransmission.1 At this point in time, the molecular pharmacology and number of ligand-binding sites in hSERT and other NSS proteins by crystal structure analysis has been determined with contentious results.210 In brief, some studies provide corroboration for two binding sites within hSERT: the S2 site located within the protein’s extracellular-facing vestibule, and the central S1 site that holds the substrate serotonin in an occluded state upon closure of the S1 site outer gate.1117 However, other studies indicate the S1 site by itself accounts for high-affinity binding of serotonin and inhibitors.45, 1819 Additionally, another unique binding site located outside the serotonin translocation pathway has been reported and utilized in the discovery of a hSERT allosteric modulator with a novel mechanism of action.20

Towards addressing these controversies regarding the function and number of ligand-binding sites in hSERT, and alternative to crystal structure analysis or singlemolecule force spectroscopy,21 photoaffinity ligands (PALs) can be used as molecular tools to directly determine ligand-protein interactions in cells.22 Over the past 10 years, clickable photoaffinity ligands have dominated and augmented the value of photoaffinity labeling for a number of disparate research applications, including 1) target identification of hit compounds emanating from phenotypic screening, 2) compound mechanism of action studies, 3) affinity-based protein profiling (AfBPP; e.g., confirmation of target engagement or selectivity profiling), 4) imaging applications, 5) binding site location and mapping, and 6) elucidation of ligand-target interactions.23

Traditionally, photoprobes have contained radiolabeled atoms (e.g., 3H, 125I), serving as a detection method. Several radioactive hSERT photoprobes have been reported based on serotonin,24 tropanes,2526 the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) imipramine,2728 and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) paroxetine29 and (S)-citalopram;30 however, none of these photoprobes have elucidated the structural basis for non-covalent interactions with hSERT. Using radioactive isotopes as reporter tags for detection purposes after photoaffinity labeling has several drawbacks, including practical concerns of special handling, the lack of an affinity handle for enrichment of probe-labeled biological macromolecules, and potentially short half-lives due to chemical degradation. The preferable alternative is to develop non-radioactive photoprobes containing a click chemistry handle.

The experimental strategy known as “tandem photoaffinity labeling-bioorthogonal conjugation” is particularly versatile and highly advantageous.31 This is namely because the same clickable photoprobe can be used for various applications depending on which reporter is attached by click chemistry subsequent to photoaffinity labeling (e.g., attachment of a fluorophore for in-gel fluorescence detection, biotin for identification/enrichment, etc.). As a result, clickable photoprobes are expected to be highly desirable compounds for hSERT structure-function studies that are not only capable of addressing the disadvantages associated with previously reported radioisotope-based probes, but also to aid in the rational design of compounds capable of modulating hSERT function in a controllable and desirable therapeutic manner.32

To our knowledge, only one clickable, covalent hSERT photophobe has been reported: azidobupramine, a terminal alkyne-containing derivative of imipramine that also contains a photoreactive aryl azide functional group for protein target capture.33 Therefore, to expand the collection of multifunctional tools derived from clinically approved antidepressants, we report herein our initial development of clickable photoprobes 57 based on (S)-citalopram (1) (Figure 1). (S)-citalopram was chosen as our first clickable hSERT photoprobe target for two reasons. First, (S)-citalopram uniquely displays high affinity for both the S1 and S2 hSERT binding sites, and is thus capable of modulating its own pharmacological activity.34 Second, in vivo studies involving mice treated with (R)-citalopram (i.e., the stereochemical enantiomer of 1) in combination with different SSRIs indicated that (R)-citalopram inhibits the serotonin signal-enhancing effects of SSRIs via an in vitro allosteric self-potentiating effect, as observed in dissociation studies involving paroxetine and escitalopram, but does not antagonize the serotonin signal-enhancing effect of fluoxetine as a non-allosteric SSRI.35 In particular, the latter observations potentially indicate elaborate interactions between serotonin and SERT inhibitors at the S2 site, which has led to a call for better tool compounds to provide direct experimental evidence for an allosteric in vivo mechanism.36

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Chemical structures of (S)-citalopram (1), radioactive azido-iodo (S)-citalopram PALs 2 - 4, and novel clickable (S)-citalopram PALs 57.

To begin our work, we postulated that the C-1 and C-5 positions of (S)-citalopram could tolerate incorporation of an “all-in-one moiety”23, 31 (i.e., a structural motif that contains a photoreactive functional group for protein capture via photoaffinity labeling and a click chemistry functional group as a latent affinity handle) without significant loss in hSERT binding affinity. This hypothesis, used in the design of radioactive azido-iodo (S)-citalopram PALs 2430 (Figure 1), was based on previously described structureactivity relationships for citalopram analogs3739 that suggested these two positions could accommodate the significant steric bulk associated with known “all-in-one moieties” without an appreciable decrease in hSERT binding affinity. To test this, novel clickable (S)-citalopram PALs 57 (Figure 1) were chemically synthesized and pharmacologically evaluated for binding affinity to hSERT as described below.

First, we designed photoprobe 5 to contain a benzophenone photoreactive functional group and a propargyl ether click chemistry handle attached as an “all-in-one moiety” to the C-1 position of (S)-citalopram (Scheme 1). To synthesize this compound, we envisioned N-alkylation of N-desmethyl (S)-citalopram (13)38 with a benzophenone propargyl ether containing a benzylic leaving group (12). Specifically, mesylate 12 was synthesized by first protecting the ketone of the known benzophenone ester 840 as a ketal, and then employing a sequence of methyl ester reduction, ketal deprotection, and conversion of the 1° alcohol to the corresponding mesylate. Final alkylation of 2° amine 13 with mesylate 12 provided target photoprobe 5 in 31% yield. It should be noted that concomitant to this work, the synthesis of a benzyl bromide derivative of alcohol 11 was reported, employing six steps and proceeding in 19% overall yield,41 whereas mesylate 12 was produced here in seven steps and 15% overall yield. However, benzophenone 5 showed a 275-fold loss in binding affinity (Ki = 487 nM) compared to (S)-citalopram (Ki = 1.77 nM) at hSERT-expressing HEK293 cells (Table 1), thus effectively eliminating this compound as a candidate for future hSERT photoaffinity labeling experiments. The outcome was consistent with the report of C-1-substituted azido-iodo (S)-citalopram photoprobe 2 sustaining a ~100-fold loss in serotonin reuptake inhibition potency compared to (S)-citalopram.30

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of clickable (S)-citalopram PAL 5.a

Table 1.

Inhibition of [125I]-RTI-55 binding of (S)-citalopram (1) and clickable (S)-citalopram PALs 57 at hSERT-HEK293 cells.

hSERT binding affinitya
Compound # (Ki,nM)
1,(S)-ciatalopram 1.77±1.14
5 487±97
6 0.16±0.04
7 10.7±7.5
a

Each Ki value represents data from at least three independent experiments with each data point on the curve performed in duplicate.

Next, we turned our attention to the design of photoprobe 6, which also contains a photoreactive benzophenone for protein capture and a propargyl ether as a click chemistry handle, but this time attached as an “all-in-one moiety” to the C-5 position of (S)-citalopram via an amide functional group (Scheme 2). Specifically, photoprobe 6 was readily synthesized in good yield by EDC coupling the nitrile-reduced form of (S)-citalopram (16)30 with known benzophenone-propargyl ether-carboxylic acid 14.40 In sharp contrast to C-1-subsituted probe 5 (hSERT Ki = 487 nM), C-5-subsituted probe 6 (hSERT Ki = 0.16 nM) displayed an 11-fold improvement in hSERT binding affinity relative to (S)-citalopram (hSERT Ki = 1.77 nM) (Table 1). To our knowledge, benzophenone 6 displays the highest hSERT binding affinity of any reported photoprobe to date. To maximize chances of photoaffinity labeling success, it is generally advisable not to limit photoprobe design to one type of photoreactive group, but rather to include at least one nitrene- or carbene-based photoprobe in addition to one benzophenone-based photoprobe.23 With this in mind, photoprobe 7 was designed and synthesized, once again by EDC coupling 1° amine 1630 with known carboxylic acid 15,42 to contain a wellknown diazide motif43 attached to the C-5 position of (S)-citalopram via an amide linkage. Specifically, diazide 7 contains (S)-citalopram conjugated to a phenyl ring bearing an aryl azide photoreactive group for protein capture and an aliphatic alkyl azide as a latent affinity handle, the latter of which survives specific photolysis conditions and can be derivatized via Staudinger-Bertozzi ligation, traditional copper-catalyzed Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition, or strain-promoted click chemistry reactions after photoaffinity labeling. While comparing unfavorably to benzophenone-based probe 6 (hSERT Ki = 0.16 nM), diazide-based probe 7 retained strong hSERT binding affinity (hSERT Ki = 10.7 nM), only 6-fold lower than (S)-citalopram (hSERT Ki = 1.77 nM).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of clickable (S)-citalopram PALs 6 and 7.

Finally, as a way of demonstrating the functional utility of these compounds, we performed tandem photoaffinity labeling-bioorthogonal conjugation using benzophenonebased probe 6 and purified hSERT44 expressed in tetracycline-induced HEK293 cells (Figure 2). Briefly, hSERT was purified using anti-FLAG affinity beads by single-step immunoaffinity chromatography, incubated with 1 μM of photoprobe 6 in the presence or absence of 100 μM (S)-citalopram (1) as a competitor, and then irradiated with 350–450 nm UV light for 20 minutes. Copper-catalyzed click chemistry with IRDye 800CW azide was then carried out at room temperature for 1 hour analogous to that previously described,45 followed by hSERT visualization using FLAG antibody detection on a Western blot. As expected, hSERT-selective photolabeling was only detected when the photoprobe 6 plus hSERT combination was UV-irradiated (Figure 2, Lane 3). The addition of 100 μM (S)-citalopram (1) competitor eliminated the hSERT crosslinking signal (Figure 2, Lane 4). Control experiments lacking UV light (Lane 1) or photoprobe 6 registered negligible hSERT photoaffinity labeling.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Tandem photoaffinity labeling-biorthogonal conjugation of purified hSERT. Lane 1 = 1 μM of photoprobe 6 in the presence of purified hSERT, but not exposed to UV light conditions for hSERT photoaffinity labeling; Lane 2 = a DMSO solution of purified hSERT without photoprobe 6 present and exposed to UV light conditions for hSERT photoaffinity labeling; Lane 3 = 1 μM of photoprobe 6 in the presence of purified hSERT and exposed to UV light conditions for hSERT photoaffinity labeling; Lane 4 = 1 μM of photoprobe 6 plus 100 μM of (S)-citalopram (1) in the presence of purified hSERT and exposed to UV light conditions for hSERT photoaffinity labeling. Panel A = detection of hSERT (red) via FLAG antibody and IRDye 800CW azide conjugated to photoprobe 6 (green); Panel B = detection of hSERT (red) via FLAG antibody; Panel C = detection of IRDye 800CW azide conjugated to photoprobe 6 (green); Panel D = % the relative intensity of staining observed for citalopram crosslinking in the monomeric band in Panel C. Staining intensity was limited to the monomeric bands to avoid any artifacts due to potentially reduced staining in immunoblots of dimer and oligomer bands due to limited access to epitopes. For less-magnified gel images that show the monomeric, dimeric, and oligomeric hSERT bands, and the absence of staining outside of these bands, please see Figure S2 in the Supporting information.

In conclusion, the most important outcome of the work briefly described in this letter is a high-affinity hSERT clickable photoaffinity ligand (i.e., 6) that is capable of undergoing tandem photoaffinity labeling-biorthogonal conjugation using purified hSERT. The motivation for this work was to expand the collection of multifunctional tools derived from clinically approved antidepressants, namely by focusing on the most pharmacologically relevant SSRI, citalopram, and by addressing the disadvantages associated with radioisotope-based hSERT photoprobes. To our knowledge, photoprobe 6 is the highest-affinity hSERT photoprobe reported, as well as the first clickable photoprobe based on a SSRI. We anticipate this photoprobe will find value in structure-function studies and other research applications involving hSERT (e.g., imaging) or other clinically-relevant members of the neurotransmitter-sodium symporter family.

Supplementary Material

1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the Mylan School of Pharmacy at Duquesne University (D.J.L.) and NIH Grant MH098127 (M.C., D.J.L.). We thank Hidehito Takayama and Shigetoshi Sugio (Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation) for the tetracycline-inducible hSERT construct used in this work.

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Supporting information associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.De Felice LJ, A current view of serotonin transporters. F1000Res 2016, 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yamashita A; Singh SK; Kawate T; Jin Y; Gouaux E, Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl--dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 2005, 437 (7056), 215–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Penmatsa A; Wang KH; Gouaux E, X-ray structure of dopamine transporter elucidates antidepressant mechanism. Nature 2013, 503 (7474), 85–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Piscitelli CL; Krishnamurthy H; Gouaux E, Neurotransmitter/sodium symporter orthologue LeuT has a single high-affinity substrate site. Nature 2010, 468 (7327), 1129–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang H; Elferich J; Gouaux E, Structures of LeuT in bicelles define conformation and substrate binding in a membrane-like context. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012, 19 (2), 212–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shi L; Quick M; Zhao Y; Weinstein H; Javitch JA, The mechanism of a neurotransmitter:sodium symporter--inward release of Na+ and substrate is triggered by substrate in a second binding site. Mol Cell 2008, 30 (6), 667–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhao Y; Terry DS; Shi L; Quick M; Weinstein H; Blanchard SC; Javitch JA, Substrate-modulated gating dynamics in a Na+-coupled neurotransmitter transporter homologue. Nature 2011, 474 (7349), 109–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quick M; Shi L; Zehnpfennig B; Weinstein H; Javitch JA, Experimental conditions can obscure the second high-affinity site in LeuT. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012, 19 (2), 207–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coleman JA; Gouaux E, Structural basis for recognition of diverse antidepressants by the human serotonin transporter. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2018, 25 (2), 170–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coleman JA; Green EM; Gouaux E, X-ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter. Nature 2016, 532 (7599), 334–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Plenge P; Shi L; Beuming T; Te J; Newman AH; Weinstein H; Gether U; Loland CJ, Steric hindrance mutagenesis in the conserved extracellular vestibule impedes allosteric binding of antidepressants to the serotonin transporter. J Biol Chem 2012, 287 (47), 39316–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Plenge P; Mellerup ET, An affinity-modulating site on neuronal monoamine transport proteins. Pharmacol Toxicol 1997, 80 (4), 197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schmitt KC; Mamidyala S; Biswas S; Dutta AK; Reith ME, Bivalent phenethylamines as novel dopamine transporter inhibitors: evidence for multiple substrate-binding sites in a single transporter. J Neurochem 2010, 112 (6), 1605–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen F; Larsen MB; Neubauer HA; Sanchez C; Plenge P; Wiborg O, Characterization of an allosteric citalopram-binding site at the serotonin transporter. J Neurochem 2005, 92 (1), 21–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sarker S; Weissensteiner R; Steiner I; Sitte HH; Ecker GF; Freissmuth M; Sucic S, The high-affinity binding site for tricyclic antidepressants resides in the outer vestibule of the serotonin transporter. Mol Pharmacol 2010, 78 (6), 1026–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Plenge P; Gether U; Rasmussen SG, Allosteric effects of R- and Scitalopram on the human 5-HT transporter: evidence for distinct high- and low-affinity binding sites. Eur J Pharmacol 2007, 567 (1–2), 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhong H; Hansen KB; Boyle NJ; Han K; Muske G; Huang X; Egebjerg J; Sanchez C, An allosteric binding site at the human serotonin transporter mediates the inhibition of escitalopram by R-citalopram: kinetic binding studies with the ALI/VFL-SI/TT mutant. Neurosci Lett 2009, 462 (3), 207–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andersen J; Stuhr-Hansen N; Zachariassen L; Toubro S; Hansen SM; Eildal JN; Bond AD; Bogeso KP; Bang-Andersen B; Kristensen AS; Stromgaard K, Molecular determinants for selective recognition of antidepressants in the human serotonin and norepinephrine transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108 (29), 12137–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sinning S; Musgaard M; Jensen M; Severinsen K; Celik L; Koldso H; Meyer T; Bols M; Jensen HH; Schiott B; Wiborg O, Binding and orientation of tricyclic antidepressants within the central substrate site of the human serotonin transporter. J Biol Chem 2010, 285 (11), 8363–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kortagere S; Fontana AC; Rose DR; Mortensen OV, Identification of an allosteric modulator of the serotonin transporter with novel mechanism of action. Neuropharmacology 2013, 72, 282–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu R; Gruber HJ; Hinterdorfer P, Two Ligand Binding Sites in Serotonin Transporter Revealed by Nanopharmacological Force Sensing. Methods Mol Biol 2018, 1814, 19–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith E; Collins I, Photoaffinity labeling in target- and binding-site identification. Future Med Chem 2015, 7 (2), 159–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lapinsky DJ; Johnson DS, Recent developments and applications of clickable photoprobes in medicinal chemistry and chemical biology. Future Med Chem 2015, 7 (16), 2143–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ransom RW; Lee JD; Bolger MB; Shih JC, Photoinactivation of serotonin uptake by an arylazido derivative of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Mol Pharmacol 1985, 28 (2), 185–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Henry LK; Field JR; Adkins EM; Parnas ML; Vaughan RA; Zou MF; Newman AH; Blakely RD, Tyr-95 and Ile-172 in transmembrane segments 1 and 3 of human serotonin transporters interact to establish high affinity recognition of antidepressants. J Biol Chem 2006, 281 (4), 2012–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Newman AH; Cha JH; Cao J; Kopajtic T; Katz JL; Parnas ML; Vaughan R; Lever JR, Design and synthesis of a novel photoaffinity ligand for the dopamine and serotonin transporters based on 2beta-carbomethoxy-3betabiphenyltropane. J Med Chem 2006, 49 (22), 6621–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wennogle LP; Ashton RA; Schuster DI; Murphy RB; Meyerson LR, 2-Nitroimipramine: a photoaffinity probe for the serotonin uptake/tricyclic binding site complex. EMBO J 1985, 4 (4), 971–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rehavi M; Tracer H; Rice K; Skolnick P; Paul SM, [3H]2-Nitroimipramine: a selective "slowly-dissociating" probe of the imipramine binding site ("serotonin transporter") in platelets and brain. Life Sci 1983, 32 (6), 645–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chudzik J; McCarthy D; Bakish D; Ravindran A; Hrdina PD, Synthesis and characterization of an aryl-azidoparoxetine. A novel photo-affinity probe for serotonin-transporter. Biochemical pharmacology 1995, 50 (8), 1211–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar V; Yarravarapu N; Lapinsky DJ; Perley D; Felts B; Tomlinson MJ; Vaughan RA; Henry LK; Lever JR; Newman AH, Novel Azido-Iodo Photoaffinity Ligands for the Human Serotonin Transporter Based on the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (S)-Citalopram. J Med Chem 2015, 58 (14), 5609–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lapinsky DJ, Tandem photoaffinity labeling-bioorthogonal conjugation in medicinal chemistry. Bioorg Med Chem 2012, 20 (21), 6237–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Topiol S; Bang-Andersen B; Sanchez C; Bogeso KP, Exploration of insights, opportunities and caveats provided by the X-ray structures of hSERT. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2016, 26 (20), 5058–5064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kirmeier T; Gopalakrishnan R; Gormanns V; Werner AM; Cuboni S; Rudolf GC; Hofner G; Wanner KT; Sieber SA; Schmidt U; Holsboer F; Rein T; Hausch F, Azidobupramine, an Antidepressant-Derived Bifunctional Neurotransmitter Transporter Ligand Allowing Covalent Labeling and Attachment of Fluorophores. PLoS One 2016, 11 (2), e0148608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen F; Larsen MB; Sanchez C; Wiborg O, The S-enantiomer of R,Scitalopram, increases inhibitor binding to the human serotonin transporter by an allosteric mechanism. Comparison with other serotonin transporter inhibitors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005, 15 (2), 193–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Storustovu S; Sanchez C; Porzgen P; Brennum LT; Larsen AK; Pulis M; Ebert B, R-citalopram functionally antagonises escitalopram in vivo and in vitro: evidence for kinetic interaction at the serotonin transporter. Br J Pharmacol 2004, 142 (1), 172–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Topiol S; Bang-Andersen B; Sanchez C; Plenge P; Loland CJ; Juhl K; Larsen K; Bregnedal P; Bogeso KP, X-ray structure based evaluation of analogs of citalopram: Compounds with increased affinity and selectivity compared with Rcitalopram for the allosteric site (S2) on hSERT. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2017, 27 (3), 470–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang P; Cyriac G; Kopajtic T; Zhao Y; Javitch JA; Katz JL; Newman AH, Structure-activity relationships for a novel series of citalopram (1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbon itrile) analogues at monoamine transporters. J Med Chem 2010, 53 (16), 6112–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar V; Rahbek-Clemmensen T; Billesbolle CB; Jorgensen TN; Gether U; Newman AH, Novel and high affinity fluorescent ligands for the serotonin transporter based on (s)-citalopram. ACS Med Chem Lett 2014, 5 (6), 696–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Banala AK; Zhang P; Plenge P; Cyriac G; Kopajtic T; Katz JL; Loland CJ; Newman AH, Design and synthesis of 1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carboni trile (citalopram) analogues as novel probes for the serotonin transporter S1 and S2 binding sites. J Med Chem 2013, 56 (23), 9709–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bandyopadhyay S; Bong D, Synthesis of Trifunctional Phosphatidylserine Probes for Identification of Lipid-Binding Proteins. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2011, 2011 (4), 751–758. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Crump CJ; Murrey HE; Ballard TE; Am Ende CW; Wu X; Gertsik N; Johnson DS; Li YM, Development of Sulfonamide Photoaffinity Inhibitors for Probing Cellular gamma-Secretase. ACS Chem Neurosci 2016, 7 (8), 1166–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yoshida S; Misawa Y; Hosoya T, Formal C–H-Azidation – Based Shortcut to Diazido Building Blocks for the Versatile Preparation of Photoaffinity Labeling Probes. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 2014, 2014 (19), 3991–3995. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hosoya T; Hiramatsu T; Ikemoto T; Nakanishi M; Aoyama H; Hosoya A; Iwata T; Maruyama K; Endo M; Suzuki M, Novel bifunctional probe for radioisotopefree photoaffinity labeling: compact structure comprised of photospecific ligand ligation and detectable tag anchoring units. Org Biomol Chem 2004, 2 (5), 637–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Takayama H; Sugio S, Functional expression of milligram quantities of the synthetic human serotonin transporter gene in a tetracycline-inducible HEK293 cell line. Protein Expr Purif 2011, 76 (2), 211–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Speers AE; Cravatt BF, Activity-Based Protein Profiling (ABPP) and Click Chemistry (CC)-ABPP by MudPIT Mass Spectrometry. Curr Protoc Chem Biol 2009, 1, 29–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES