Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2018 Sep 24;11(9):1316–1320. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1316-1320

Effect of Newcastle disease virus level of infection on embryonic length, embryonic death, and protein profile changes

Dahliatul Qosimah 1,, Sri Murwani 1, Edhy Sudjarwo 2, M Arfan Lesmana 3
PMCID: PMC6200569  PMID: 30410239

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Newcastle disease virus (NDV) is an obligate intracellular parasite. Virus can only live on living cells. The embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) are one of the growth media of virus that is a cheap, easy to do, and accurate for showing patterns of virus change in the host. Higher virus titers indicate the higher number of viruses and more virulent to infect host. This research aimed to investigate the effect of different level of NDV titer infection in ECEs on protein profile, embryonic length, mortality, and pathological change.

Materials and Methods:

The study used a completely randomized design of six treatments and seven replications. The treatments were different level of NDV titer infection in allantoic fluid (AF) of 9-11 days ECEs, i.e., P1=20, P2=26, P3=27, P4=28, P5=29, and P6=210 hemagglutination unit (HAU). All samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with p=0.05 for length of the embryo and descriptive analysis for embryo mortality, pathology change, and protein band.

Results:

The result showed that protein profile of NDV-infected ECEs of all different levels is more complex than protein profile of no NDV-infected ECEs. NDV infected of all different levels showed longer size embryo, higher mortality embryo at the first 2 days, and higher occurrence of hemorrhagic in all part of bodies of embryo than those of no NDV infected.

Conclusion:

It was concluded that NDV infection of all different level decreased health conditions of chicken embryo of ECEs of 9-11 days old. Different level of NDV infection of ECEs of 9-11 days old showed no significantly different embryo profiles. However, all of the NDV-infected embryos were shorter, death on the 2nd day, and suffered more hemorrhage on all body surfaces than uninfected NDV embryos.

Keywords: embryo, Newcastle disease, pathological change, protein, titer, virus

Introduction

Newcastle disease (ND) is caused by ND virus (NDV) which is a genus of Avulavirus and Paramyxoviridae family. The incidence of ND that attacks poultry shows manifestations of gastrointestinal, respiratory, and neurological disorders that cause deaths of up to 100% depending on the viral pathotype [1,2]. ND virus is highly contagious and causes huge economic losses in the poultry industry due to the decrease in production and quality of eggs and chicken performance [3]. Virulent of NDV strains are endemic to poultry in most of Asia, Africa, and some northern and southern states of America. This disease can also be transmitted to humans. ND disease first epidemic in Java Island, Indonesia in 1926 and spread pandemically in chickens and other poultry subsequently found in Newcastle upon Tyne, England in 1927 [4,5].

NDVs can invade the host through inhalation, fecal-oral transmission routes, excretion of infected poultry, and contact through virus-contaminated equipment [2]. Isolation of the ND virus can come from fecal and nasopharyngeal swabs, as well as organs. ND virus can be grown in embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) and cultured chicken embryo fibroblast cells [6].

NDV virulence detection is important for vaccination and eradication programs [7]. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of administering various doses of NDV infection to pathogenicity cause death and organ disorders in ECEs and as well as protein profiles in allantoic fluid (AF) as the basic research reference for the development of biomolecular research.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

This research had received ethical approval from the Ethics Commission of Faculty of Medicine of Brawijaya University, Malang (Ethic Certificates No 803-KEP-UB).

Research method

The study used a completely randomized design of six treatments and seven replications. The treatments were different level of NDV infection of 9-11 days ECEs, i.e., P1=20, P2=26, P3=27, P4=28, P5=29, and P6=210 hemagglutination unit (HAU). Protein profile, embryonic length, mortality, and pathological change were observed, and the data were descriptively analyzed and using analysis of variance.

Propagation and harvest of NDV in ECEs

Propagation of NDV in ECEs of 9-11 days old is negative against NDV antibodies (based on HA and hemagglutination inhibition [HI] test that showed titer of antibody negative). Based on observation using polymerase chain reaction methods on AF of ECEs, it was identified that NDV had F protein with a nucleotide length of 362 bP. Furthermore, the ECEs were put in egg incubator at 37°C and observed daily for viral death through light observation. The optimum standard temperature for embryo growth is 37.5-37.8°C [8]. The dead embryo shows no movement and black color. Embryos that have not shown death until the 7th day, the embryo is forced off by being placed in the refrigerator at a temperature of 4°C. Collection of allantoic fluid from eggs infected by a virus was then measured by viral titers using HA test and HI test [9,10]. The stock of ND viruses in AF was stored at −20°C until use [11].

NDV identification using HA test

HA test was used to find out the virus that has hemagglutinin protein to agglutinate 1% chicken erythrocytes. The samples used were AF from viral infection yield to ECEs. HA titers exhibit the highest dilution indicating viral proteins that are still capable of agglutinating erythrocytes [12,13]. Samples were inserted in a 96-well microtiter plate with a “V” shape base. Test was done in duplo.

NDV identification using HI Test

HI test was performed according to OIE [9] using viral antigen ND 4 HA unit per well using 1% erythrocyte chicken. HI titers show the highest dilution of specific antibodies that are capable of inhibiting viruses to agglutinate the virus expressed as log2. The test was repeated twice.

Mean death time test

NDV with titer variation of 106-1010 was infected on seven ECEs for each treatment subsequently incubated at 37°C. Embryonic death was observed daily for 7 days and evaluated through candling and recorded embryonic mortality. The highest dilution in which all embryos die was calculated as mean lethal dose [7]. Viral virulence was categorized by three classifications: Embryo mortality <60 h (Velogenic), 60-90 h (Mesogenic), and > 90 h (Lentogenic) [3].

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) test

Protein profile of AF of infected NDV embryo of ECEs was analyzed by SDS-PAGE test. A total of 5 μl of AF was introduced into 7.5% stacking gel and 12% separating gel, then electrophoresis was run at room temperature with a voltage of 200 V. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained using a 0.1% Coomassie blue solution for 24 h and destained using methanol and glacial acetic acid for approximately 3 h [14,15].

Results

Protein profile of AF from normal and NDV-infected embryo of ECEs

Figure-1 presents the protein profile of AF of NDV-infected embryo of ECEs (B) as compared to those of AF from normal or no NDV-infected embryo of embryonated chicken eggs (B; [16]). All AFs of NDV-infected embryo of all different level showed same protein profile with a molecular weight ranged from 7.29 KDa to 135.28 KDa (Figure-1b), which were different from those AF of normal or no NDV-infected embryo (Figure-1a) [16].

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Protein profile of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) test (Lane 1 left=molecular weight marker); (Lane 2=Titer virus 26), (Lane 3=Titer virus 27); (Lane 4=Titer virus 28); (Lane 5=Titer virus 29); (Lane 6=Titer virus 210). (a) Protein profile of allantoic fluid (AF) of no NDV-infected embryo as identified using SDS-PAGE, first lane [16]. (b) Protein profile of AF of NDV-infected embryo of ECEs 9-11 days of age.

Influence of NDV titer level against embryo size

The results showed that level of NDV titer infection on ECEs 9-11 days of age did not show significantly different on embryo size but greater than those on non-infected NVD embryo (Table-1).

Table-1.

Average chicken embryo size as affected by the level of NDV infection.

Treatment Average±SD (cm)
No viral infection (20) 3.96a
26 HAU 5.26b
27 HAU 4.92b
28 HAU 5.26b
29 HAU 4.88b
210 HAU 5.08b

Values with different superscript in the same column showed significantly different (p<0.05), SD=Standard deviation. NDV=Newcastle disease virus

Influence of NDV titer level against of embryonic pathology

Figure-2 showed gross pathology in all treatments. All NDV-infected embryos showed hemorrhage in all parts of the body, whereas no NDV-infected ones showed healthy embryo and no hemorrhage.

Figure-2.

Figure-2

Gross pathology of the embryo in level infection of ND virus. (a) No virus infection (20) showed no hemorrhage in all part of the body; (b-f) inoculation with virus titer 26, 27, 28, 29, and 210 hemagglutination unit showed hemorrhage in all part of the body.

Discussion

Protein profile of no NDV-infected chicken embryos is more complex than the protein profile of NDV-infected chicken embryos of all different levels. According to Dewi and Surachmi [17] that there are many serine protease-containing enzymes such as trypsin in the AF of ECEs that were infected with NDV. The enzymes degrade specific proteins on the molecular weight so that the gel will not absorb color and will be visualized as a band that is not stained. Trypsin can be found in the respiratory and digestive tract. Trypsin breaks down the F protein of NDV making it easier for NDV to replicate. Cleavage site sequence of the F protein of NDV, which increases the virulence of the NDV [18]. The protein profile of NDV-infected chicken embryos was clearly seen at infection level of 27 HAU or higher.

The results of research are contrary to that done by Al-Garib et al. [19], which explains that NDV infection can lead to weight loss. NDV strains can replicate in the respiratory and digestive systems but preferably the digestive system. NDV can cause mass destruction of lymphoid organs in the gastrointestinal tract characterized by the presence of ulcers in the digestive epithelium. NDV could infect the digestive system causing proventriculus and intestinal hemorrhage and edema [20]. According to Kapczynski et al. [21] that pathological changes are associated with malabsorption syndrome in chickens as characterized by epithelial cell degeneration and crypta, also villus atrophy. The depth of the villi will increase in the infected embryo. Villi serve to absorb nutrients of food. Increased peristaltic movement of the intestines that decreased nutrient absorption and finally resulting in weight loss. NDV can also replicate in the respiratory system and lymphoid organs such as lung, spleen, fabricius, and thymus exchanges [6].

The ECEs used in this experiment did not contain antibodies against NDV because antibodies neutralized the virus and protect the embryo through two ways, first by binding infected cells, then reduce the production of progeny virus, and the second by releasing the progeny virus so that it will inhibit the spread of the virus [22].

The velogenic of NDV caused hemorrhage in all body systems. Hemorrhage was especially in the occipital part [7]. The infective dose of the ECEs was 23, whereas the infective dose in the chicken was 26 [23]. This was in accordance with Ahamed et al. [24] that the velogenic of NDV showed clinical symptoms of hemorrhage and necrosis of the respiratory tract and digestion. It also disrupted the nervous system [25]. Clinical symptoms appear varied depending on the strain of the virus, avian species and age, recurrent disease, and maternal immunity [2]. The results showed that all variations velogenic of NDV titer infected in ECEs caused the death of embryo on the 2nd day. Death of embryos (100%) with a titer of NDV strains velogenic variation occurs within 48 h. This was consistent with Balachandran et al. [7] that NDV strains caused high mortality varies velogenic 60 h-90 h in ECEs infected with 25-27 NDV titers. This statement did not correspond to Mulisa et al. [26] that isolates velogenic NDV in birds caused death at 3-6 days post-infection. Immunity of embryo was strongly influenced by the immune system of the embryo, the amount of virus, and the virus strain.

The growth of the NDV titer 103.9 TCID can be observed in Vero monolayer cells histopathologically showed the presence of cytopathic effect (CPE) followed by the formation of multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) 30-40 h after infection. CPE is characterized by granular cytoplasm around infected cells, development of microplaque, intracytoplasmic, vacuolization, and syncytia formation [27].

According to research conducted by Putra et al. [25], the embryos infected by the virus ND isolate Salatiga appear dark red and skin looks wet. Subcutaneous tissue containing blood and blood vessels stand out.

Embryonic mortality was influenced by several factors such as embryonic age, viral dosage, embryo’s immune status, incubation time, and environmental temperature. Infectious viruses can survive for months at room temperature in chicken eggs infected with the virus [8].

The NDV has an envelope, the single-stranded negative-sense RNA genome consists of six genes that encode the structural proteins and V and W proteins of the P gene called RNA editing [26].

Protein matrix (M), fusion (F) and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) of NDV related to the viral coat proteins which M function to perform virus budding formation, whereas F and HN protein mediate the entry and release of NDV. The virulence of NDV is determined by the amino acid composition of multiple basic amino acids from the breakdown of protein protease F [27]. F protein located on the virus envelope or outer sheath which mediates F of the virus with the host cell membrane. Protein F with host cells at neutral pH causes multinucleate (synticia) conditions that result in tissue necrosis and viral spread [5].

NDV protein profile showed molecular weight molecules tightly 7.29-135.28 Kda. This study contradicts Khan et al. [14] that the weight of NDV 12.5-181 Kda molecule uses 24-26 virus titers. During replication, NDV breaks down the glycoprotein precursors F0 to F1 and F2 for virus progeny to become infectious which can only occur in AF compared to culture cells. The NDV has six genes that affect viral pathogens, namely nucleoprotein, phosphoprotein (P), M, (F), HN, and polymerase (L). Virulence of the NDV ranges from avirulent (lentogenic), to mildly virulent (mesogenic) and highly virulent (velogenic), which can infect birds both naturally and experimentally [26].

Based on the results of the study showed that various variations of virulent titers of NDV (26-210) in ECEs showed death on the 2nd day post-infection and the presence of hemorrhage but no significant difference to embryonic length than without infection. Recent studies have shown that a new protein profile is visible on the NDV 27 titers.

Conclusion

It was concluded that NDV infection of all different level decreased health conditions of chicken embryo of ECEs of 9-11 days old. Different level of NDV infection of ECEs of 9-11 days old showed no significantly different embryo profiles. However, all of the NDV-infected embryos were shorter, death on the 2nd day, and suffered more hemorrhage on all body surfaces than uninfected NDV embryos.

Authors’ Contributions

DQ was responsible for controlling the course of studies and analyzing data. SM did SDS-PAGE analysis. ES performed ND virus inoculation and harvested the results. MAL did HA and HI test. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledged to the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, the Republic of Indonesia for providing funding for this study with contract No. 460.58/UN10.C10/2017.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

References

  • 1.Mohammadamin O.G, Qubih T.S. Histopathology of virulent newcastle disease virus in immune broiler chickens treated with IMBO®. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2011;25:9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abdisa T, Tagesu T. Review on Newcastle disease of poultry and it's public health importance. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 2017;8:441. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orsi M.A, Júnior D, Reischak D, Da Silva H.A, Spilki F.R, Buzinaro M.G, Arns C.W. Newcastle disease virus vaccine strains: Immunogenicity is not influenced by ICPI. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2009;11:129–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang H.M, Zhao J, Xue J, Yang Y.L, Zhang G.Z. Antigenic variation of LaSota and genotype VII newcastle disease virus (NDV) and their efficacy against challenge with velogenic NDV. Vaccine. 2017;35:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ganar K, Das M, Sinha S, Kumar S. Newcastle disease virus: Current status and our understanding. Virus Res. 2014;184:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kang Y, Minsha F, Xiaqiong Z, Xu D, Bin X, Pei G, Yulian L, Li Y, Tao R. Newcastle disease virus infection in chicken embryonic fibroblasts but not duck embryonic fibroblasts is associated with elevated host innate immune response. Virol. J. 2016;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s12985-016-0499-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Balachandran P, Srinivasan P, Sivaseelan S, Balasubramaniam G.A, Murthy T.R.G. Isolation and characterization of newcastle disease virus from vaccinated commercial layer chicken. Vet. World. 2014;7:457–462. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romanini C.E.B, Exadaktylos V, Tong Q, McGonnel I, Demmers T.G.M, Bergoug H, Eterradossi N, Roulston N, Garain P, Bahr C, Berckmans D. Monitoring the hatch time of individual chicken embryos. Poult. Sci. 2013;92:303–309. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (Mammals, Birds and Bees) 7th ed. Vol. 2. Paris: OIE; 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alexander D.J, Manvell R.J, Parsons G. Newcastle disease virus (strain herts 33/56) in tissues and organs of chickens infected experimentally. Avian Pathol. 2006;35:99–101. doi: 10.1080/03079450600597444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bilal E.S.A, Elnasri I.M, Alhassan A.M, Khalifa K.A, Elhag J.I, Ahmed S.O. Biological pathotyping of newcastle disease viruses in Sudan 2008-2013. J. Vet. Med. 2014;2014:1–4. doi: 10.1155/2014/209357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.OIE. Newcastle Disease (Infection with Newcastle Disease Virus) Ch. 2.3.14. Paris: OIE; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shah A.M, Shah A.R, Mirbahar K.H, Naeem M, Jatoi A.S, Wagan B. Virulence of newcastle disease virus in different species through various dilutions. Sci. Int. (Lahore) 2016;28:1255–1258. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khan H.A, Siddique M, Rahman S.U, Arshad M, Ashraf M. Comparative molecular characterization of field and vaccinal strains of newcastle disease virus. Pak. Vet. J. 2005;25:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sambodo P, Joko P, Kurniasih K, Sudarmanto I. In vitro potential anthelmintic activity of Biophytum petersianum on Haemonchus contortus. Vet. World. 2018;11(1):1–4. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Perozo F, Pedro V, Roser D, Claudio L.A, Linda B.P. The VG/GA strain of newcastle disease virus: Mucosal immunity, protection against lethal challenge and molecular analysis. Avian Pathol. 2008;37(3):237–245. doi: 10.1080/03079450802043734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dewi R.E, Surachmi S. Pathology and immunohistochemistry study of newcastle disease field case in chicken in Indonesia. Vet World. 2017;10(9):1066–1071. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1066-1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Read-Snyder J, Edens F.W, Cantor A.H, Pescatore A.J, Pierce J.L. Effect of dietary selenium on small intestine villus integrity in reovirus-challenged broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2009;8(9):829–835. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Al-Garib S.O, Gielkens L.J, Gruys E, Koch G. Review of newcastle disease virus with particular references to immunity and vaccination. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2003;59:185–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dimitrov K.M, Afonso A.L, Yu Q, Miller P.J. Newcastle disease vaccines-a solved problem or a continuous challenge? Vet Microbiol. 2017;206:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kapczynski D.R, Afonso C.L, Patti J.M. Immune responses of poultry to Newcastle disease virus. Dev. Com. Immunol. 2013;41:447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gohm D.S, Th¨ur B, Hofmann M.A. Detection of newcastle disease virus in organs and faeces of experimentally infected chickens using RT-PCR. Avian Pathol. 2000;29:143–152. doi: 10.1080/03079450094171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rue C.A, Leonardo S, Ingrid C, Corrie C.B, Kapczynski D.R, Suarez D.L, Daniel J.K, Miller P.J, Afonso C.L. Virulent newcastle disease virus elicits a strong innate immune response in chickens. J. Gen. Vir. 2011;92:931–939. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.025486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ahamed T, Hossain K.M, Billah M.M, Islam K.M.D, Ahasan M.M, Islam M.E. Adaptation of newcastle disease virus (NDV) on Vero cell line. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004;3(2):153–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Putra H.H, Michael H.W, Tri U, Kurniasih K. Case study of macroscopic and microscopic lesion of chicken embryo infected with virulence Newcastle disease viruses. J. Sain Vet. 2012;30(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mulisa D.D, Menbere K, Redeat B.A, Melaku S.K, Alice F, Alireza H, Tesfaye R.C, Hassen C.C. Characterization of Newcastle disease virus and poultry-handling practices in live poultry markets, Ethiopia. Springerplus. 2014;3:459. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dortmans J.C.F, Rottier P.J.M, Koch G, Peeters B.P.H. Passaging of a newcastle disease virus pigeon variant in chickens results in selection of viruses with mutations in the polymerase complex enhancing virus replication and virulence. J. Gen. Virol. 2011;92:336–345. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.026344-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES