Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2018 Oct 25;6(10):e01191. doi: 10.1002/aps3.1191

Tolerance strategies revealed in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa; Paeoniaceae) ecotypes differentially adapted to desiccation

Lili Guo 1, Dalong Guo 2, Weilun Yin 3,✉, Xiaogai Hou 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6201725  PMID: 30386716

Abstract

Premise of the Study

Tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa; Paeoniaceae) is well known for its ornamental value, edible oil, and medicinal properties. However, its growing area has been limited by drought that has been exacerbated by global climate change.

Methods

Gene expression profiles of a drought‐tolerant cultivar and a drought‐sensitive cultivar during dehydration and rehydration were investigated by transcriptome analysis. Expression patterns of unigenes related to drought and recovery response and unrelated to either cultivar were classified by hierarchical clustering and real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR).

Results

A total of 81,725 unigenes with a mean length of 762 nucleotides that may play roles in drought response were identified. Unigenes were characterized as being involved in lipid transport metabolism, proline metabolism, and photosynthesis. In addition, plant hormone signaling pathway genes were also characterized as potentially being involved in drought response. Expression patterns of the 20 drought‐responsive unigenes verified by qPCR showed a differential expression pattern under either the drought or recovery treatment.

Discussion

This is the first report to identify and verify unigenes of tree peonies with differing water sensitivity during dehydration and rehydration. This study offers a valuable resource for candidate genes involved in drought and provides insight into the breeding of drought‐resistant tree peony cultivars.

Keywords: drought tolerance, Paeonia suffruticosa, Paeoniaceae, transcriptome analysis, tree peony

Tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews; Paeoniaceae) has been cultivated for more than 1600 years in China, and there are approximately 2000 tree peony cultivars worldwide (Wang, 1997). The first written description of this genus was in 200 BC as a medicinal plant. In the fifth century, with the selection of multiple flower shapes and colors, it became known as an ornamental plant (Li et al., 2011). Studies have shown that the seed oil of tree peony contains abundant unsaturated fatty acids that are beneficial to human health (Sarker et al., 1999; Su et al., 2016). Owing to its multiple uses, the peony genus has spread through Asia, to the Mediterranean, Caucasus Mountains, the mountainous regions of Europe, the United States, and Australia (Rogers, 1995).

The greatest number of cultivated varieties and the largest distribution area of tree peony are found in central China, which has long been characterized by an arid climate. Nevertheless, severe water deficiency stress can limit the cultivation area, lead to smaller leaves and flowers, inhibit the synthesis of organic substances and flower pigments, and reduce the ornamental value and seed yield of tree peony (Li et al., 2011). Recent studies, however, have mainly focused on oil extraction (Chen et al., 2016a, b; Cui et al., 2016; Han et al., 2016). In addition, efficient protocols for the micropropagation of tree peony and the effects of different medium compositions and exogenous hormones on the browning of tree peony callus in tissue culture were recently investigated (Wen et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2016a). Surprisingly, however, the desiccation tolerance strategies in tree peony cultivars have not yet been investigated.

Transcriptome analysis that uses deep sequencing technology now permits large‐scale gene expression detection in the absence of a reference genome. Although there have been several investigations of transcriptome sequencing of tree peony (Gai et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014, 2015; Zhao et al., 2014; Barghini et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016b), studies of drought‐responsive differential expression genes in tree peonies have not yet been reported in the literature. Two separate studies of reference gene selection in tree peony—one in plants with different flower colors and another during flower development—were recently reported (Li et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2016b).

Screening of drought‐tolerant tree peony cultivars revealed that ‘Luo Yang Hong’ (LYH) is tolerant to drought, whereas ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ (WLPS) is tolerant to flooding (Kong et al., 2011), making the two cultivars ideal study material for investigating mechanisms of drought response in plants. With a view toward improving plant structure, perfecting bloom quality, and mitigating damage from desiccation, this study used LYH and WLPS with their contrasting water sensitivity to characterize unigenes during dehydration and rehydration to explore the complex mechanisms of drought response networks.

Materials and Methods

Plant material treatment and sample collection

Four‐year‐old LYH and WLPS seedlings were cultured in pots using soil collected from the Luoyang National Peony Garden (Luoyang, China). The pots were buried deep in the ground from October until May to avoid freezing injury. The pots were then dug out and irrigated once every two days and cultured under natural conditions before they were used for the water deficiency treatments. Five individuals were used per treatment. The drought treatment (DR) was initiated by tap water irrigation until the soil moisture content reached 80%, after which plants were dehydrated naturally for seven days until the leaves had severely wilted. For the rehydration treatment (RE), the tree peonies were re‐watered until the soil moisture content again reached 80%, after which they were cultured for one more day to let the leaf blades completely unfold. Tree peonies cultured in pots with a constant soil moisture content of 80% served as the control treatment (CK). The soil moisture content was measured by gravimetric methods (Bao, 2000). For all three treatments, the third and fourth leaves were sampled and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, and sequencing

The leaves sampled from the three different treatments (DR, RE, and CK) were assigned to six independent pools. Total RNA was extracted using the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Gambino et al., 2008). The integrity of RNA was examined by an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). An in‐house library preparation method was used for mRNA sequencing, using fragment sizes of 200 bp. Libraries were quantified by an Agilent Bioanalyzer and qualified by the ABI StepOnePlus Real‐Time PCR System (Thermo‐Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) during the quality control steps. Libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, Shenzen, Guangzhou, China) at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI). Each library was run on a separate lane of the HiSeq. The cDNA library was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly database (BioSample accession no. SRS1180651).

De novo assembly and protein‐coding region prediction

Reads with adapters, unknown nucleotides larger than 5%, and low‐quality reads (bases quality ≤10) were discarded. Only reads longer than 90 bp were used for assembly. Reads from all treatments and/or cultivars were assembled together by Trinity 3.4 (Grabherr et al., 2011; open source code publicly available at http://TrinityRNASeq.sourceforge.net). Because a reference genome is not available for tree peony, reads were mapped to the assembled unigene set.

Unigenes were first aligned by BLASTX (E‐value <0.00001) to protein databases in the following order of NCBI's nonredundant protein database (nr), Swiss‐Prot, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and NCBI's Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) database. Unigenes aligned to a higher‐priority database were not aligned to lower‐priority databases. The best alignment results were used to decide sequence direction of unigenes. When a unigene was not aligned with any of the above databases, ESTScan was used to determine its sequence direction (Iseli et al., 1999).

Proteins with the highest ranks in the BLAST results were used to decide the coding region sequences of unigenes, then the coding region sequences were translated into amino sequences with the standard codon table. Unigenes that could not be aligned to any database were scanned by ESTScan (Iseli et al., 1999), producing nucleotide sequence (5′–3′) direction and amino sequence of the predicted coding region.

Gene ontology classification and metabolic pathway analysis

Unigene functional classification and annotation was performed by WEGO (http://wego.genomics.org.cn/) (Ye et al., 2006). Gene function in cellular processes and gene products during metabolism process were analyzed by KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg) (Kanehisa et al., 2008).

Real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR) verification analysis

Twenty dehydrin‐related unigenes were selected for the assessment of expression profiles. Total RNA was converted into single‐stranded cDNA using an M‐MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The ABI StepOnePlus Real‐Time PCR System (Thermo‐Fisher Scientific) was utilized to perform the expression profile verification. The reaction was carried out as described in our previous publication (Pang et al., 2015), using three biological replicates per sample. The relative gene expression levels of the selected unigenes were normalized to 18S rRNA and calculated using the 2‐ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). The primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primer sequences used for real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Gene Forward primers (5′–3′) Reverse primers (5′–3′)
Unigene8873_All_LYH‐DR ACAAGACCCCCGAGCTTTTT CATATGCATCCGTCTGGCGA
CL8710.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR GACCCTCCCAAACAGTCGTC TGTTCGTCGGTGTCTGATCC
Unigene5006_All_LYH‐DR CGGCTTATCGTATGCGTGGT GCAGCTCCGTTCCGAGTTTA
Unigene16234_All_LYH‐DR AGGCCAAAACAGGGGAACAC CCTTTGACACAGCCGAGGAA
CL2427.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR TTGGCGAGATCGTCACTTCC AAGACGGCGTCGGTTCTATC
Unigene383_All_LYH‐DR ACGGGCGAAGACGACAATAA CACTACTGGTTGTGCGGCAT
Unigene18390_All_LYH‐DR CGAGTGCCAAAGGGAGAGTT GCAGACTCGTCGTCTGACTT
CL9864.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR CGCACTCGTCATGTCCTACTT GCACAGCTTACGCGACTAAC
Unigene1202_All_LYH‐DR ACTAATATCGGCGGGGAGGA CCCTCCTCACCTCTACCCTC
Unigene1395_All_LYH‐DR ACTGCTTGTCTCAAGCTCACTT TCATCGGTGATCGTGGAAGC
CL4531.Contig1_All_LYH‐RE CCGACGTGCTCTGACATGAA AAGGTGCAGAACCCAAAGGT
CL154.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE CCAGACCCAGCAACTCTGTT CGCTGGTCACCATTTTGCTC
Unigene4037_All_LYH‐RE ATGGCTTAACAAGCACCCGA TTTACGGGCCTGTGCAAGAT
Unigene25204_All_LYH‐RE CGCCTCACACCAAAAGTCAAG CTTTCAACAACAGGGCACGG
CL3906.Contig3_All_LYH‐RE ATGCCGAACCAACTACACGA TCACCGCAGAGCATAACTGG
CL10838.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE GCGGCAACTACGTCTTTTGA CGAGAGCGAAGAGAGCATGT
Unigene15264_All_LYH‐RE AGGCAAGTACGTGGGAGGTA CCCAGAACATCTCCGACACG
Unigene32639_All_LYH‐RE AAGTAGAGCCCAAGCAGCAT CGTATCCAGGCGGAGCTTTT
CL7346.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE AACAGTACTCCTCGTCCGGT GGAGTCCATACCGATGTGCC
CL7474.Contig3_All_LYH‐RE GCATGTCGACGATGAACACG TTCGCCCCTCTTGTCAATCC
Open in a new tab

Results

Sequencing output statistics, assembly metrics, and protein‐coding region classification

The total number of clean nucleotides generated from the six libraries of the two tree peony cultivars (LYH and WLPS) by three treatments (CK, DR, and RE) exceeded 4.6 Gbp. The number of clean reads of LYH‐CK, LYH‐DR, LYH‐RE, WLPS‐CK, WLPS‐DR, and WLPS‐RE were 54, 52, 52, 52, 51, and 52 million, respectively. The Q20 values exceeded 97%, and the GC contents were approximately 46% of all samples, which meant that the sequencing data were robust for further analysis. After assembling all sequences from all samples, 81,725 unigenes were obtained. Their aggregate length was 62,310,011 nucleotides, with a mean length of 762 nucleotides.

A total of 41,808 protein‐coding regions from the unigenes were translated into amino sequences. Detailed information of their length distributions is given in Appendix 1. The COG analysis showed that 14,768 unigenes were assigned to 25 classifications. The largest category was ‘General function prediction only’; ‘Transcription,’ ‘Replication, recombination, and repair,’ ‘Post transcriptional modification, protein turnover, chaperones,’ and ‘Signal transduction merchanism’ were comparatively high; and ‘RNA processing and modification’ had the smallest number of responding unigenes (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) function classification of all unigenes. The letters on the x‐axis indicate the COG categories listed to the right of the histogram.

Functional annotation of the unigenes

A total of 43,977 unigenes were successfully allocated to the three main gene ontology categories: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component (Fig. 2). The biological process category contained 22 classes subsumed under five larger groups: cellular process (18,310), metabolic process (17,809), single‐organism process (12,415), stimulus (8451), and biological regulation (6850). The cellular components category consisted of 17 classes, dominated by cell (21,823), cell part (21,822), and organelle (17,580). The molecular function category consisted of 16 classes, for which catalytic activity (14,450), binding (14,248), and transporter activity (2069) were the largest groups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Functional category distribution of assembled unigenes in tree peony. The results were summarized in three main categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function.

Significantly enriched gene ontology terms with a larger cluster frequency (i.e., ≥9%) were identified. For the biological process category, the oxygen‐containing compound and oxidation‐reduction process were more common not only among treatments (CK, DR, and RE) within a cultivar but also between the cultivars (LYH and WLPS) for a given treatment. The unigenes responded to stimuli, including abiotic, endogenous, biotic, and chemical stimuli that were identified extensively in LYH and WLPS. Unigenes’ response to stress was detected only in the CK vs. RE treatments of LYH (Appendix 2). For the molecular function category, unigenes were identified in DR vs. RE of LYH, while oxidoreductase and catalytic activity were largely detected both between cultivars and among the treatments. None of the other candidate molecular functions were identified, except the above two functions between LYH and WLPS (Appendix 3). For the cellular component category, the membrane, cell periphery, plasma membrane, and extracellular region were extensively detected in the LYH and WLPS treatments separately. Within the same treatment, however, none of the unigenes responded to the cellular component between the cultivars (LYH and WLPS) apart from two exceptions: the membrane detected in DR and the extracellular region identified in RE (Appendix 4).

Identification of dehydration‐ and rehydration‐responsive unigenes

A total of 971 drought‐responsive unigenes in LYH were identified by comparison of LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR (8979), LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐RE (5650), and LYH‐DR vs. LYH‐RE (9397) (Fig. 3A), whereas 1064 drought‐responsive unigenes in WLPS were identified by comparison of WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR (14,446), WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐RE (5593), and WLPS‐DR vs. WLPS‐RE (13,327) (Fig. 3B). Further comparison identified 373 unigenes in both LYH and WLPS. Excluding the 83 unigenes accessed by the comparison of LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR and WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR (Fig. 3C), 290 unigenes lacking any relationship with genotype yet responding to dehydration and rehydration were detected. Hierarchical clustering of LYH‐CK, LYH‐DR, LYH‐RE, WLPS‐CK, WLPS‐DR, and WLPS‐RE indicated that CK, DR, and RE were clustered together, revealing dehydration‐ and rehydration‐responsive unigenes (Fig. 4). We note that our differential expression results are preliminary, as our experiments lack replication. Follow‐up experiments will be needed to fully validate our observations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Venn diagram of unigenes with annotation from the cultivars ‘Luo Yang Hong’ (LYH) and ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ (WLPS). The Venn diagram shows the overlapping unigene response to both drought (DR) and rehydration (RE) in LYH (A) and WLPS (B), and the overlapping unigenes related to each cultivar (C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Hierarchical clustering of three accumulated water phases for the cultivars ‘Luo Yang Hong’ (LYH) and ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ (WLPS). x‐axis: sample information. A dendrogram based on the analysis of the 290 drought‐responsive unigenes is shown on the left of the figure, while a dendrogram based on a clustering analysis of the samples is shown above the figure. Colors indicated the unigene expression levels, with darker colors signifying higher levels of expression. Red indicates unigenes that were upregulated, whereas blue indicates unigenes that were downregulated.

Pathway analysis using the KEGG database

BLAST analysis of 81,725 unigenes against the KEGG database was performed to analyze gene products during metabolism processes and related gene functions in cellular processes. A total of 23,518 unigenes were involved in 128 KEGG pathways. More than one‐fifth (21.77%) were related to metabolic pathways, whereas 11.82% were related to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, 5.51% were related to plant–pathogen interaction, and 4.69% were related to plant hormone signal transduction (Table 2).

Table 2.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway statistics

Pathway No. of genes with pathway annotation (%)a Pathway ID
Metabolic pathways 5121 (21.77%) ko01100
Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites 2781 (11.82%) ko01110
Plant–pathogen interaction 1296 (5.51%) ko04626
Plant hormone signal transduction 1103 (4.69%) ko04075
Spliceosome 972 (4.13%) ko03040
RNA transport 953 (4.05%) ko03013
RNA degradation 746 (3.17%) ko03018
Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes 745 (3.17%) ko03008
Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum 627 (2.67%) ko04141
Ribosome 625 (2.66%) ko03010
Endocytosis 613 (2.61%) ko04144
Starch and sucrose metabolism 541 (2.3%) ko00500
Glycerophospholipid metabolism 538 (2.29%) ko00564
Pyrimidine metabolism 510 (2.17%) ko00240
mRNA surveillance pathway 505 (2.15%) ko03015
Purine metabolism 503 (2.14%) ko00230
Ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis 433 (1.84%) ko04120
Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis 380 (1.62%) ko00940
Ether lipid metabolism 366 (1.56%) ko00565
Zeatin biosynthesis 310 (1.32%) ko00908
Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis 310 (1.32%) ko00010
Oxidative phosphorylation 300 (1.28%) ko00190
Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis 285 (1.21%) ko00900
ABC transporters 279 (1.19%) ko02010
RNA polymerase 259 (1.1%) ko03020
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions 245 (1.04%) ko00040
Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism 244 (1.04%) ko00520
Homologous recombination 239 (1.02%) ko03440
Open in a new tab
a

The total number of genes was 23,518.

The KEGG pathways of unigenes with annotation for the two cultivars (LYH vs. WLPS) within the same treatment and among treatments (CK, DR, and RE) within the same cultivar were also analyzed. The metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, plant–pathogen interactions, and plant hormone signal transduction had similar percentages in all pathways identified. Abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene, brassinosteroids, salicylic acid, gibberellins, cytokinin, and auxin signaling pathways were all detected in this study. It is interesting to note that when analyzing the pathway between LYH and WLPS, the plant hormone signal transduction pathway was not detected in CK and RE (Table 3). LYH and WLPS exhibited higher plant–pathogen interaction after dehydration than the control, which might be caused by plant interaction with a pathogen such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. However, it was unclear why a plant–pathogen interaction apparently went undetected after rehydration.

Table 3.

Pathway analysis of unigenes with pathway annotation (P ≤ 0.05).a

Unigene comparison Metabolic pathways Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites Plant–pathogen interaction Plant hormone signal transduction
LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR 985/3972 = 24.8 622/3972 = 15.66 317/3972 = 7.98 260/3972 = 6.55
LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐RE 574/2366 = 24.26 378/2366 = 15.98 179/2366 = 7.57 170/2366 = 7.19
LYH‐DR vs. LYH‐RE 1131/4142 = 27.31 697/4142 = 16.83 355/4142 = 8.57 331/4142 = 7.99
WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR 1430/5905 = 24.22 838/5905 = 14.19 411/5905 = 6.96 368/5905 = 6.23
WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐RE 567/2234 = 25.38 334/2234 = 14.95 172/2234 = 7.7 159/2234 = 7.12
WLPS‐DR vs. WLPS‐RE 1455/5503 = 26.44 841/5503 = 15.28 416/5503 = 7.56 383/5503 = 6.96
LYH‐CK vs. WLPS‐CK 652/2332 = 27.96 409/2332 = 17.54 170/2332 = 7.29 —
LYH‐DR vs. WLPS‐DR 835/2843 = 29.37 507/2843 = 17.83 229/2843 = 8.05 160/2843 = 5.63
LYH‐RE vs. WLPS‐RE 596/2011 = 29.64 348/2011 = 17.3 — —
Open in a new tab
a

Values are number/total = percentage.

Unigene validation by qPCR

To validate the expression profiling of the dehydrin‐responsive unigenes, 20 genes predicted to participate in the dehydrin response pathway were selected (1) to determine their relative expression in the dehydration (DR), rehydration (RE), and nontreatment of tree peony (CK) and (2) to validate the transcriptome sequencing results. Abundance of the target genes was normalized relative to the abundance of 18S RNA; the Ct values (i.e., the number of cycles corresponding to the inflection point from baseline to exponential growth) of 18S rRNA for all samples ranged from 24.0 to 26.0. The results of the qPCR verification showed a differential expression pattern under both the DR and RE treatments. Dehydrin Xero 2‐like was significantly upregulated after dehydration but then downregulated during rehydration of tree peony seedlings (Table 4).

Table 4.

Real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR) validation of 20 unigenes in three tree peony treatment groups: dehydration, rehydration, and a control group

Gene ID Nr annotation 2‐ΔΔ CT Log2 (DR_FPKM or RE_FPKM/CK_FPKM)
Unigene8873_All_LYH‐DR Dehydrin [Paeonia suffruticosa] 5.3658 4.4933
CL8710.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR Ethylene response factor 11 [Actinidia deliciosa] −0.1155 −1.4333
Unigene5006_All_LYH‐DR Ethylene responsive transcription factor 1A [Prunus salicina] 5.0722 3.5543
Unigene16234_All_LYH‐DR Ethylene‐responsive transcription factor 1B, putative [Ricinus communis] 9.1154 4.4226
CL2427.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR GDSL esterase/lipase EXL3 [Vitis vinifera] −2.7565 −3.0232
Unigene383_All_LYH‐DR GDSL esterase/lipase 1 [Vitis vinifera] 4.5329 2.5685
Unigene18390_All_LYH‐DR RING‐H2 finger protein ATL60‐like [Vitis vinifera] 5.7046 3.3146
CL9864.Contig2_All_LYH‐DR RING‐H2 finger protein ATL78 [Vitis vinifera] −1.6611 −2.444
Unigene1202_All_LYH‐DR RING‐H2 zinc finger protein RHA4a [Vitis vinifera] −3.5098 −4.4392
Unigene1395_All_LYH‐DR Transcription factor bHLH135 [Vitis vinifera] −0.0729 −2.4395
CL4531.Contig1_All_LYH‐RE Transcription factor bHLH63‐like [Vitis vinifera] −1.4411 −1.5683
CL154.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE NAC domain‐containing protein 72 [Vitis vinifera] −0.3531 −2.7657
Unigene4037_All_LYH‐RE Zinc finger CCCH domain‐containing protein 53‐like [Glycine max] −1.0864 −2.9649
Unigene25204_All_LYH‐RE MYBF1 [Vitis vinifera] −0.5343 −1.4983
CL3906.Contig3_All_LYH‐RE Uncharacterized calcium‐binding protein At1g02270 [Vitis vinifera] 6.7048 4.9768
CL10838.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE Universal stress protein A‐like protein [Vitis vinifera] 9.8757 3.6137
Unigene15264_All_LYH‐RE TIR‐NBS type disease resistance protein [Populus trichocarpa] 7.0632 5.5444
Unigene32639_All_LYH‐RE Heavy metal–associated isoprenylated plant protein 26‐like [Fragaria vesca subsp. vesca] 13.1831 3.3610
CL7346.Contig2_All_LYH‐RE Glutamate dehydrogenase, putative [Ricinus communis] 14.1086 7.3002
CL7474.Contig3_All_LYH‐RE 17.9 kDa class II heat shock protein isoform 1 [Vitis vinifera] −1.4672 −3.6081
Open in a new tab

CK = control treatment; DR = drought treatment; FPKM = fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads; Nr = National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant protein database; RE = rehydration treatment.

Discussion

Drought stress is one of the main abiotic stresses, and it may alter plant growth, metabolism, and yield (Ajithkumar and Panneerselvam, 2014). In tree peonies cultivated in central and northwestern China, water deficiency is a common problem. This drought stress limits the growth of leaves and flowers, inhibits the synthesis of organic compounds and anthocyanin, and reduces seed yield (Li et al., 2011). Plants that receive drought signals initiate a range of physiological, morphological, and biochemical defense responses at both the cellular and molecular level (Verslues et al., 2006). An overexpression of genes in response to drought stress could alleviate drought‐induced damage while promoting plant growth. Drought tolerance strategies, as revealed by transcriptome sequencing in poplar (Barghini et al., 2015) and sorghum (Fracasso et al., 2016), have uncovered a number of drought‐responsive genes. To diminish the damage caused by water deficiency in tree peony, two cultivars with contrasting water sensitivity were selected for unigene characterization to investigate the molecular mechanisms driving their drought response.

Plants can adapt to desiccation stresses and stay alive by alternating the accumulation of osmolytes (Parida et al., 2007). Proline, one of the most important osmolytes, is quickly accumulated and involved in the plant response to dehydration to maintain a cellular balance of water content and turgor potential (Vendruscolo et al., 2007). A previous study showed that proline accumulates after dehydration and then decreases to the initial level after rehydration in both LYH and WLPS tree peony cultivars (Li et al., 2014). Proline variation during dehydration and rehydration corresponded to transcriptome analysis and was consistent with that reported in previous publications (Gechev et al., 2012; Hossain et al., 2016). In the present study, numerous unigenes related to the proline metabolism process, including proline‐rich proteins (Unigene8963_All, Unigene11447_All), proline transporters (Unigene11945_All), and an osmotic precursor (CL5318.Contig1_All) were identified in LYH and WLPS under the dehydration and rehydration treatments.

One of the most harmful effects of drought stress is increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Miller et al., 2010; Bartwal et al., 2016). When plants suffer drought stress, active oxygen metabolism is strengthened, which generates a large amount of O2 −, H2O2, and OH− (Bian and Jiang, 2009). However, plants possess an evolved antioxidant defense system that enables them to maintain ROS at a low quantity to protect cells from excessive and permanent oxidative damage. Therefore, the ability of plants to clear the active oxygen can reflect their ability to tolerate stress (Hossain et al., 2016). Induction of the antioxidant enzymes’ expression level makes the antioxidant system an efficient mechanism to control ROS accumulation, both temporally and spatially (Hossain et al., 2016). These redox‐sensitive proteins may be oxidized by ROS directly or indirectly via non‐enzymatic compounds, such as glutathione (GSH), which are major players in redox signaling when antioxidants are involved (Shao et al., 2008; Klumpen et al., 2016; Thangamani et al., 2016). The unigene corresponding to glutamate (CL7346.Contig2_All) displayed a different responsive pattern in tree peony when exposed to dehydration and rehydration.

Large pigment–protein complexes are the most significant factors that function during photosynthesis (Qin et al., 2015). Light‐harvesting complex stress‐related proteins catalyze excess energy dissipation in photosystems I (PSI) and II (PSII) (Pinnola et al., 2015). The unigenes involved in photosynthesis include 14 subunit complexes in PSI and another 14 subunit complexes in PSII, which were examined in the present study. Specifically, the chlorophyll a/b‐binding protein that encodes the light‐harvesting complex (LHC), which captures sunlight and transfers the excitation energy to the core in higher plants, was obtained. Four unique subunits (PsaG, PsaH, PsaN, and PsaO) of the PSI‐LHCI super complex in higher plants were detected in the present study. As a member of the ROS, H2O2 and its production occur in the chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and mitochondria of plants. Drought‐treated plants had a significantly increased ROS content and diminished operating and maximum efficiencies of PSII photochemistry (Ryan et al., 2014). Reduced photosynthetic pigment contents resulting from drought stress might decrease ROS formation by regulating chlorophyll synthesis and other components of the photosynthetic machinery.

ROS generation is considered to be closely related to lipid peroxidation under drought stress (Ryan et al., 2014; Uzilday et al., 2014). For example, lipid peroxidation analysis showed that transgenic Agrostis stolonifera L. root exhibited less cellular damage when compared with the wild type under drought stress conditions (Xu et al., 2016). The alleviation of adverse effects of drought stress is partially attributable to an increased antioxidant ability and decreased lipid peroxidation induced by early ROS accumulation (Xing et al., 2016). Tobacco plants treated with low and moderate levels of riboflavin accumulated higher levels of ROS and lipid peroxide with enhanced drought tolerance (Deng et al., 2014). In the present study, 666 unigenes involved in lipid transport and metabolism were identified according to the COG classification. This clearly illustrates the close relationship between lipid peroxidation and the drought stress response in plants.

Calcium mobilization is one of the downstream events modulated by H2O2 (Neill et al., 2002). The calcium ion (Ca2+) functions as a secondary messenger in modulating diverse physiological processes that are important for stress adaptation in plants. Both Ca2+ and Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM)–binding protein and transcription factors have been identified, and their functional analysis suggests that they play key roles in plant stress signaling pathways (Reddy et al., 2011). Previous studies have indicated that drought stress activates ABA‐dependent and ABA‐independent gene expression (Yoshida et al., 2014). The cis‐regulatory element ABA‐responsive element (ABRE) (CACGTG [T/C/G]) and their coupling elements ([C/A]ACGCG[T/C/G]) in the upstream region were observed in the upregulated genes (Kaplan et al., 2006). Hence, it was concluded that for some specific Ca2+ transients, ABREs function as Ca2+‐responsive cis‐regulatory elements (Reddy et al., 2011).

ABRE and calcium‐dependent protein kinase (CDPK) have been found to be related to drought stress in other plant species (Yoshida et al., 2010; Zou et al., 2010). In the present study, ABREs (CL3759.Contig1_All and CL3759.Contig2_All) and CDPKs (unigene21495_All, unigene21823_All, CL5185.Contig3_All, and CL3906.Contig3_All) were identified. In addition, transcript accumulation of the myeloblastosis (MYB) transcription factor, the APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF), the NAM, ATAF, AND CUC (NAC) transcription factor, the basic helix‐loop‐helix (bHLH) protein, and the zinc RING finger protein (RING‐H) were all identified after desiccation stress, which agrees perfectly with ABA accumulation (Nakashima and Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, 2013; Furlan et al., 2014). Further studies are required to reveal their mechanisms of regulating drought resistance in tree peonies.

Heat stress can trigger the higher expression of heat‐shock proteins (HSPs), which might coordinate with other stress‐response mechanisms to mitigate cellular damage and re‐establish cellular homeostasis (Wang et al., 2004). Copper applied to tree peony revealed an increase in dehydration‐responsive element–binding (DREB) protein (Wang et al., 2016a). In the present study, we identified one class II HSP isoform 1 (CL7474.Contig3_All) and one heavy metal–associated isoprenylated plant protein (HIPP) (Unigene32639_All), both of which were unrelated to genotype but responsive to dehydration and rehydration. Regulation of HSP and HIPP by dehydration and rehydration in tree peony illustrates the synergistic interaction of drought with other stress‐response mechanisms to alleviate cellular damage and re‐establish cellular homeostasis.

Conclusions

Transcriptome profiling analysis demonstrated unigene response to dehydration and rehydration in tree peony, namely MYB, AP2/ERF, NAC, bHLH, RING‐H, HSP, and HIPP. These newly identified unigenes will increase our understanding of drought stress–responsive mechanisms, and they may be quite useful as novel genes for the molecular breeding of tree peony to improve its drought tolerance. Further research is necessary to reveal and understand how antioxidant enzymes interact with key hormones in the signaling responses of plants to drought stress.

Data Accessibility

The cDNA library was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly database (BioSample accession no. SRS1180651).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (grant no. 162300410079), the Education Department Project of Henan Province (grant no. 17A180003), and the Innovative Research Team in Henan University of Science and Technology (grant no. 2015TTD003).

Appendix 1. Length distribution of the protein‐coding region (CDS) prediction. (A) Length distribution of CDS using BLASTX. (B) Length distribution of CDS using ESTScan. (C) Length distribution of proteins using BLASTX. (D) Length distribution of proteins using ESTScan.

graphic file with name APS3-6-e01191-g005.jpg

Appendix 2. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of biological processes (P ≤ 0.05).a

Biological process LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR (3785) LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐RE (2241) LYH‐DR vs. LYH‐RE (4038) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR (5682) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐RE (2073) WLPS‐DR vs. WLPS‐RE (5482) LYH‐CK vs. WLPS‐CK (2087) LYH‐DR vs. WLPS‐DR (2614) LYH‐RE vs. WLPS‐RE (1759)
Oxygen‐containing compound 14.5% 18.3% 14.6% 14.5% 16.4% 14.4% 14.0%
Oxidation‐reduction process 15.7% 15.7% 15.1% 16.5% 15.1% 16.6% 16.3%
Stimulus 41.7% 45.9% 43.1% 40.9% 43.1% 41.7%
Abiotic stimulus 19.2% 22.3% 19.7% 19.2% 19.9% 18.8%
Endogenous stimulus 10.5% 13.4% 11.6% 10.9% 11.9% 10.8%
Biotic stimulus 10.5% 10.9% 10.2% 10.4% 10.6%
Chemical stimulus 23.2% 27.0% 23.6% 22.4% 22.9%
Stress 27.0%
Organic substance 17.8% 16.1% 15.6% 15.4%
Single‐organism metabolic process 35.2% 36.6% 35.1% 34.5%
Single‐organism biosynthetic process 11.8% 11.4% 11.0%
Single‐organism transport 19.8% 19.1% 18.9%
Single organism signaling 11.5% 10.8% 11.0%
Signaling 11.5% 10.8% 11.0%
Signal transduction 11.2% 10.2% 10.7%
Cell communication 13.5% 12.8% 13.3%
Other organism 10.2% 10.0%
Inorganic substance 11.7% 11.0%
Organic acid metabolic process 12.8% 12.8%
Oxoacid metabolic process 12.8% 12.8%
Carboxylic acid metabolic process 12.7% 12.7%
Open in a new tab

CK = control treatment; DR = drought treatment; LYH = ‘Luo Yang Hong’ cultivar; RE = rehydration treatment; WLPS = ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ cultivar.

a

Numbers in parentheses in the column headings represent the number of unigenes.

Appendix 3. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of molecular functions (P ≤ 0.05).a

Molecular function LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR (3697) LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐RE (2196) LYH‐DR vs. LYH‐RE (3996) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR (5522) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐RE (2017) WLPS‐DR vs. WLPS‐RE (5340) LYH‐CK vs. WLPS‐CK (2106) LYH‐DR vs. WLPS‐DR (2634) LYH‐RE vs. WLPS‐RE (1792)
Oxidoreductase activity 17.6% 19.3% 19.1% 16.4% 15.9% 18.2% 17.0% 17.6% 18.2%
Catalytic activity 68.8% 70.8% 67.1% 68.1% 69.4% 68.5% 70.3%
Transporter activity 11.5% 2.1% 11.5%
Protein kinase activity 11.0% 10.4%
Phosphotransferase activity, alcohol group as acceptor 11.9% 11.5%
Kinase activity 13.8%
Transmembrane transporter activity 10.0%
Open in a new tab

CK = control treatment; DR = drought treatment; LYH = ‘Luo Yang Hong’ cultivar; RE = rehydration treatment; WLPS = ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ cultivar.

a

Numbers in parentheses in the column headings represent the number of unigenes.

Appendix 4. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of cellular components (P ≤ 0.05).a

Cellular component LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐DR (3683) LYH‐CK vs. LYH‐RE (2031) LYH‐DR vs. LYH‐RE (3800) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐DR (5503) WLPS‐CK vs. WLPS‐RE (1879) WLPS‐DR vs. WLPS‐RE (5235) LYH‐CK vs. WLPS‐CK (1969) LYH‐DR vs. WLPS‐DR (2373) LYH‐RE vs. WLPS‐RE (1609)
Membrane 43.6% 43.2% 48.3% 43.8% 41.6% 46.3% 42.3%
Cell periphery 27.8% 28.4% 31.0% 27.3% 26.8% 28.2%
Plasma membrane 22.3% 23.7% 25.7% 23.1% 23.7%
Extracellular region 10.7% 9.8% 10.9% 9.1% 9.7% 9.2% 9.3% 9.3%
Chloroplast 25.7%
Plastid 29.2%
Open in a new tab

CK = control treatment; DR = drought treatment; LYH = ‘Luo Yang Hong’ cultivar; RE = rehydration treatment; WLPS = ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’ cultivar.

a

Numbers in parentheses in the column headings represent the number of unigenes.

Guo, L. , Guo D., Yin W., and Hou X.. 2018. Tolerance strategies revealed in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa; Paeoniaceae) ecotypes differentially adapted to desiccation. Applications in Plant Sciences 6(10): e1191.

Contributor Information

Weilun Yin, Email: hkdhxg@126.com.

Xiaogai Hou, Email: hkdhxg@126.com.

Literature Cited

  1. Ajithkumar, I. P. , and Panneerselvam R.. 2014. ROS Scavenging system, osmotic maintenance, pigment and growth status of Panicum sumatrense Roth. under drought stress. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 68: 587–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bao, S. 2000. Soil and agriculture chemical analysis. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barghini, E. , Cossu R. M., Cavallini A., and Giordani T.. 2015. Transcriptome analysis of response to drought in poplar interspecific hybrids. Genomics Data 3: 143–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartwal, A. , Pande A., Sharma P., and Arora S.. 2016. Intervarietal variations in various oxidative stress markers and antioxidant potential of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) subjected to drought stress. Journal of Environmental Biology 37: 517–522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bian, S. , and Jiang Y.. 2009. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Scientia Horticulturae 120: 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, F. , Zhang X., Du X., Yang L., Zu Y., and Yang F.. 2016a. A new approach for obtaining trans‐resveratrol from tree peony seed oil extracted residues using ionic liquid‐based enzymatic hydrolysis in situ extraction. Separation and Purification Technology 170: 294–305. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, F. , Zhang X., Zhang Q., Du X., Yang L., Zu Y., and Yang F.. 2016b. Simultaneous synergistic microwave‐ultrasonic extraction and hydrolysis for preparation of trans‐resveratrol in tree peony seed oil‐extracted residues using imidazolium‐based ionic liquid. Industrial Crops and Products 94: 266–280. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui, H. , Cheng F., and Peng L.. 2016. Determination of the fatty acid composition in tree peony seeds using near‐infrared spectroscopy. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society 93: 943–952. [Google Scholar]
  9. Deng, B. L. , Jin X. H., Yang Y., Lin Z. W., and Zhang Y. L.. 2014. The regulatory role of riboflavin in the drought tolerance of tobacco plants depends on ROS production. Plant Growth Regulation 72: 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fracasso, A. , Trindade L. M., and Amaducci S.. 2016. Drought stress tolerance strategies revealed by RNA‐Seq in two sorghum genotypes with contrasting WUE. BMC Plant Biology 16(1): 115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furlan, A. L. , Bianucci E., del Carmen Tordable M., Castro S., and Dietz K. J.. 2014. Antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in peanut nodules during a drought and rehydration cycle. Functional Plant Biology 41: 704–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gai, S. , Zhang Y., Mu P., Liu C., Liu S., Dong L., and Zheng G.. 2012. Transcriptome analysis of tree peony during chilling requirement fulfillment: Assembling, annotation and markers discovering. Gene 497: 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gambino, G. , Perrone I., and Gribaudo I.. 2008. A rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochemical Analysis 19: 520–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, L. , Yang H., Liu H., Yang J., and Hu Y.. 2016. Extensive transcriptome changes underlying the flower color intensity variation in Paeonia ostii . Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gechev, T. S. , Dinakar C., Benina M., Toneva V., and Bartels D.. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in resurrection plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 69: 175–3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grabherr, M. G. , Haas B. J., Yassour M., Levin J. Z., Thompson D. A., Amit I., Adiconis X., et al. 2011. Full‐length transcriptome assembly from RNA‐Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29(7): 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han, J. , Liu Z., Li X., Li J., and Hu Y.. 2016. Diversity in seed oil content and fatty acid composition in three tree peony species with potential as sources of omega‐3 fatty acids. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 91: 175–179. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hossain, M. A. , Wani S. H., Bhattacharjee S., Burritt D. J., and Tran L. S. P.. 2016. Drought stress tolerance in plants, Vol. 1: Physiology and biochemistry. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  19. Iseli, C. , Jongeneel C. V., and Bucher P.. 1999. ESTScan: A program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences In Lengauer T., Schneider R., Bork P., Brutlag D., Glasgow J., Mewes H.‐W., and Zimmer R. [eds.], Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology in Heidelberg, Germany, 1999, 138–148. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California, USA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanehisa, M. , Araki M., Goto S., Hattori M., Hirakawa M., Itoh M., Katayama T., et al. 2008. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D480–D484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaplan, B. , Davydov O., Knight H., Galon Y., Knight M. R., Fluhr R., and Fromm H.. 2006. Rapid transcriptome changes induced by cytosolic Ca2+ transients reveal ABRE‐related sequences as Ca2+‐responsive cis elements in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 18: 2733–2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klumpen, E. , Hoffschroer N., Zeis B., Gigengack U., Dohmen E., and Paul R. J.. 2016. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the heat stress response of Daphnia pulex: ROS‐mediated activation of hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 (HIF‐1) and heat shock factor 1 (HSF‐1) and the clustered expression of stress genes. Biology of the Cell 109(1): 39–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kong, X. , Zhang M., Wang X., Wang R., Dong Y., and Sheng L.. 2011. Comparative studies on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of two Paeonia suffruticosa varieties under water stress. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 47: 162–167. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, J. , Zhang X., and Zhao X.. 2011. Tree peony in China, 20–22. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, J. , Kong X., Li J., Liu G., and Guo L.. 2014. Effect of gradual drought stress on physiological indexes of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. Northern Horticulturea 16: 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, S. , Wang L., Shu Q., Wu J., Chen L., Shao S., and Yin D.. 2015. Fatty acid composition of developing tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) seeds and transcriptome analysis during seed development. BMC Genomics 16: 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, J. , Han J., Hu Y., and Yang J.. 2016. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real‐time PCR during flower development in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Livak, K. J. , and Schmittgen T. D.. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real‐time quantitative PCR and the 2‐ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller, G. , Suzuki N., Ciftci‐Yilmaz S., and Mittler R.. 2010. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 453–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakashima, K. , and Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki K.. 2013. ABA signaling in stress‐response and seed development. Plant Cell Reports 32: 959–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neill, S. J. , Desikan R., Clarke A., Hurst R. D., and Hancock J. T.. 2002. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signalling molecules in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 1237–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pang, T. , Guo L., Shim D., Cannon N., Tang S., Chen J., Xia X., et al. 2015. Characterization of the transcriptome of the xerophyte Ammopiptanthus mongolicus leaves under drought stress by 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 10: e0136495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Parida, A. K. , Dagaonkar V. S., Phalak M. S., Umalkar G., and Aurangabadkar L. P.. 2007. Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short‐term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnology Reports 1: 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pinnola, A. , Cazzaniga S., Alboresi A., Nevo R., Levin Zaidman S., Reich Z., and Bassi R.. 2015. Light‐harvesting complex stress‐related proteins catalyze excess energy dissipation in both photosystems of physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell 27: 3213–3227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Qin, X. , Suga M., Kuang T., and Shen J.‐R.. 2015. Structural basis for energy transfer pathways in the plant PSI‐LHCI supercomplex. Science 348: 989–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reddy, A. S. , Ali G. S., Celesnik H., and Day I. S.. 2011. Coping with stresses: Roles of calcium‐ and calcium/calmodulin‐regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 23: 2010–2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rogers, A. 1995. Peonies. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryan, A. C. , Hewitt C. N., Possell M., Vickers C. E., Purnell A., Mullineaux P. M., Davies W. J., and Dodd I. C.. 2014. Isoprene emission protects photosynthesis but reduces plant productivity during drought in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants. New Phytologist 201: 205–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sarker, S. D. , Whiting P., Dinan L., Šik V., and Rees H. H.. 1999. Identification and ecdysteroid antagonist activity of three resveratrol trimers (suffruticosols A, B and C) from Paeonia suffruticosa . Tetrahedron 55: 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shao, H. B. , Chu L. Y., Lu Z. H., and Kang C. M.. 2008. Primary antioxidant free radical scavenging and redox signaling pathways in higher plant cells. International Journal of Biological Sciences 4(1): 8–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi, Q. , Zhou L., Wang Y., Li K., Zheng B., and Miao K.. 2015. Transcriptomic analysis of Paeonia delavayi wild population flowers to identify differentially expressed genes involved in purple‐red and yellow petal pigmentation. PLoS ONE 10: e0135038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Su, J. , Ma C., Liu C., Gao C., Nie R., and Wang H.. 2016. Hypolipidemic activity of peony seed oil rich in α‐linolenic, is mediated through inhibition of lipogenesis and upregulation of fatty acid β‐oxidation. Journal of Food Science 81(4): H1001–H1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Thangamani, S. , Eldesouky H. E., Mohammad H., Pascuzzi P. E., Avramova L., Hazbun T. R., and Seleem M. N.. 2016. Ebselen exerts antifungal activity by regulating glutathione (GSH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in fungal cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1861: 3002–3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Uzilday, B. , Turkan I., Ozgur R., and Sekmen A. H.. 2014. Strategies of ROS regulation and antioxidant defense during transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria under PEG‐induced osmotic stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 65–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vendruscolo, E. C. G. , Schuster I., Pileggi M., Scapim C. A., Molinari H. B. C., Marur C. J., and Vieira L. G. E.. 2007. Stress‐induced synthesis of proline confers tolerance to water deficit in transgenic wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology 164: 1367–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Verslues, P. E. , Agarwal M., Katiyar‐Agarwal S., Zhu J., and Zhu J. K.. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant Journal 45: 523–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, L. 1997. Cultivar group of tree peony and cultural distribution. Pictorial record of Chinese tree peony varieties. Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, W. , Vinocur B., Shoseyov O., and Altman A.. 2004. Role of plant heat‐shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science 9: 244–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, R. , Gao M., Ji S., Wang S. S., Meng Y. L., and Zhou Z. G.. 2016a. Carbon allocation, osmotic adjustment, antioxidant capacity and growth in cotton under long‐term soil drought during flowering and boll‐forming period. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 107: 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, Y. , Dong C., Xue Z., Jin Q., and Xu Y.. 2016b. De novo transcriptome sequencing and discovery of genes related to copper tolerance in Paeonia ostii . Gene 576: 126–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wen, S. S. , Cheng F. Y., Zhong Y., Wang X., Li L. Z., Zhang Y. X., and Qiu J. M.. 2016. Efficient protocols for the micropropagation of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa ‘Jin Pao Hong’, P. suffruticosa ‘Wu Long Peng Sheng’, and P. × lemoinei ‘High Noon’) and application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve plantlet establishment. Scientia Horticulturae 201: 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  52. Xing, X. , Fang C., Li L., Jiang H., Zhou Q., Jiang H., and Wang S.. 2016. Improved drought tolerance by alpha‐naphthaleneacetic acid‐induced ROS accumulation in two soybean cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15: 1770–1784. [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu, Y. , Burgess P., Zhang X., and Huang B.. 2016. Enhancing cytokinin synthesis by overexpressing ipt alleviated drought inhibition of root growth through activating ROS‐scavenging systems in Agrostis stolonifera . Journal of Experimental Botany 67: 1979–1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ye, J. , Fang L., Zheng H., Zhang Y., Chen J., Zhang Z., Wang J., et al. 2006. WEGO: A web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Research 34: W293–W297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yoshida, T. , Fujita Y., Sayama H., Kidokoro S., Maruyama K., Shinozaki J. M. K., and Shinozaki K. Y.. 2010. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE‐dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant Journal 61: 672–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yoshida, T. , Mogami J., and Yamaguchishinozaki K.. 2014. ABA‐dependent and ABA‐independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 21: 133–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang, C. , Wang Y., Fu J., Dong L., Gao S., and Du D.. 2014. Transcriptomic analysis of cut tree peony with glucose supply using the RNA‐Seq technique. Plant Cell Reports 33: 111–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang, Y. Z. , Cheng Y. W., Ya H. Y., Han J. M., and Zheng L.. 2015. Identification of heat shock proteins via transcriptome profiling of tree peony leaf exposed to high temperature. Genetics and Molecular Research 14: 8431–8442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhao, D. , Jiang Y., Ning C., Meng J., Lin S., Ding W., and Tao J.. 2014. Transcriptome sequencing of a chimaera reveals coordinated expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes mediating yellow formation in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.). BMC Genomics 15: 689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou, H. , Cheng F., Wang R., Zhong Y., and He C.. 2013. Transcriptome comparison reveals key candidate genes responsible for the unusual reblooming trait in tree peonies. PLoS ONE 8: e79996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhou, F. F. , Wang Z., Shi L., Niu J. J., Shang W., He D., and He S. L.. 2016a. Effects of different medium composition and exogenous hormones on browning of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) callus in tissue culture. Flower Research Journal 24: 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhou, L. , Shi Q., Wang Y., Li K., Zheng B., and Miao K.. 2016b. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for quantitative gene expression studies in tree peony. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 141: 99–127. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zou, J. J. , Wei F. J., Wang C., Wu J. J., Ratnasekera D., Liu W. X., and Wu W. H.. 2010. Arabidopsis calcium‐dependent protein kinase CPK10 functions in abscisic acid‐ and Ca2+‐mediated stomatal regulation in response to drought stress. Plant Physiology 154: 1232–1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The cDNA library was deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly database (BioSample accession no. SRS1180651).

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES