The Supporting Information files S1 and S2 Text and S1, S2 and S3 Tables incorrectly contain tracked changes. Please view the corrected files below.
Supporting information
S1 Text. Overview and critique of the Universal Moral Grammar model.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.5KB, docx)
S2 Text. Overview and critique of the Moral Foundations Theory.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.3KB, docx)
S1 Table. T-tests for the manipulation checks for low- and high-stakes vignettes.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (14.7KB, docx)
S2 Table. Correlation coefficients between self-identifications with moral theories and Preferences for Precepts Implied in Moral Theories (PPIMT).
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (13.7KB, docx)
S3 Table. Summary of the findings of the ADC-components.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.7KB, docx)
Reference
- 1.Dubljević V, Sattler S, Racine E (2018) Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0204631 10.1371/journal.pone.0204631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
S1 Text. Overview and critique of the Universal Moral Grammar model.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.5KB, docx)
S2 Text. Overview and critique of the Moral Foundations Theory.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.3KB, docx)
S1 Table. T-tests for the manipulation checks for low- and high-stakes vignettes.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (14.7KB, docx)
S2 Table. Correlation coefficients between self-identifications with moral theories and Preferences for Precepts Implied in Moral Theories (PPIMT).
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (13.7KB, docx)
S3 Table. Summary of the findings of the ADC-components.
(DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (16.7KB, docx)