Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2018 Sep 3;16(5):6095–6099. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9377

Effects of NOTCH1 signaling inhibitor γ-secretase inhibitor II on growth of cancer stem cells

Xiaodong Ding 1,, Changqing Ding 1,, Fei Wang 2, Wenshuai Deng 1, Mingming Yu 3, Qinghai Meng 1, Peng Sun 1
PMCID: PMC6202534  PMID: 30405755

Abstract

The present study aimed to observe the effect of the Notch1 signaling inhibitor γ-secretase inhibitor II (GSI II) on the growth and differentiation of tumor cells. The tumor cell line U87 was grown in serum-free media, and cell growth was evaluated using immunofluorescence. Single-cell wall-adherent growing conditions were prepared, GSI II was added, and the differentiation and growth of single tumor cells was evaluated. Immunofluorescence demonstrated positive results for the expression of Nestin and cluster of differentiation 133. The cell proliferation rate was reduced following the addition of GSI II (P<0.05). GSI II may significantly inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of U87 tumor stem cells.

Keywords: stem cells, brain tumor, Notch1, γ-secretase inhibitor II

Introduction

A defining characteristic of malignant brain tumors is their invasive growth and easy recurrence (1,2), and therefore more effective treatment modalities are urgently required. A previous study revealed the existence of tumor stem cells (TSCs), which have the same functions as neural stem cells inside tumor cells including the ability to self-proliferate (3). There are a number of similarities between TSCs and neural stem cells that suggest the origin of TSCs (4), a variety of solid tumors, including brain tumors (5) and expression of numerous similar proteins (6). The discovery of TSCs has provided novel options for the treatment of brain tumors (7), including therapies targeting specific signaling pathways and transcription factors, and niche therapies targeting cancer stem cells (8,9). TSCs serve major roles inside tumor tissues, acting as a source for the proliferation and differentiation of tumors. Even in the presence of regulatory factors, TSCs continue to proliferate and differentiate; additionally, the next generation of cells retains the characteristics of the precursors. These characteristics include an unlimited proliferation ability, which promotes the rapid formation of tumor bodies as well as rapid reoccurrence following surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (10).

Nestin, a class VI intermediate filament protein, was originally detected in neural stem cells during development, and has been shown to be expressed in the transformed cells of various human malignancies (11). It is hypothesized to contribute to the aggressive behavior of these cells and facilitate tumor growth (12).

Cluster of differentiation (CD) 133 is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are characterized by their ability for self-renewal and tumorigenicity (13). Over-expression of CD133 is associated with solid cancers, many studies have correlated the overexpression of CD133 with survival, recurrence, metastasis or therapy resistance (14).

TSCs can regulate the conduction pathways involved in cell proliferation and differentiation; these pathways include, Notch (15), Wnt, sonic hedgehog (SHH), and Bmi-1 (16), which have important roles in regulating the growth of neural stem cells. A previous study has demonstrated the important roles of Wnt and the SHH signaling conduction pathways in regulating the proliferation of neural stem cells (17). When tissues are damaged, the self-protective roles of the Wnt and SHH signaling conduction pathways are activated to repair the damaged tissues, after which the corresponding pathways are disrupted through strict regulation. However, when certain genes, including casein kinase 1 epsilon (18) and sil (19), are mutated, the Wnt and SHH pathways can become abnormally activated, enabling cells to undergo unlimited proliferation and differentiation. The blocking of differentiation and maturation can induce tumors and abnormalities in the Wnt and SHH pathways can lead to glioblastoma (20); however, one study has identified that signal transduction pathway inhibitors can shrink tumors in mice until they have disappeared and induce rapid cell apoptosis of medulloblastoma in vitro (21).

The Notch signaling pathway has been conserved throughout evolution and is involved in cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. It not only serves important roles in cell fate during organ development, but also can be reactivated in disease states, participating in cell apoptosis, regeneration, and differentiation through cross-talk with other signaling pathways, which can affect the occurrence and development of various diseases (22,23). However, few studies have examined these issues, and understanding the activities of these pathways is important for the development of novel cancer therapeutics.

The Notch signaling pathway is associated with tumorigenesis, and γ-secretase inhibitor II (GSI II) factor inhibits the activation of Notch1, which is a member of the Notch signaling pathway (24). In the present study, TSCs from the human brain tumor cell line U87 were identified, and then added GSI II to the human brain glioma cell line U87 for co-culture to observe the growth of TSCs.

Materials and methods

Materials

The cell culture medium contained Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium combined with Ham's F-12 nutrient mixture (DMEM/F12, Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd., Wuhan, China). Additives included 2% B27, 2% N2, epidermal growth factor 20 mg/l−1, and basic fibroblast growth factor 20 mg/l−1 (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.). Antibodies included rabbit anti-human Nestin antibody (cat. no. n5413; 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), mouse anti-human CD133 antibody (cat. no. o43490; 1:500; Bioworld Technology, Inc., St. Louis Park, MN, USA), Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody (cat. no. BA103; 1:100; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat anti-rabbit antibody (cat. no. BA1105; 1:50; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.), and rabbit anti-human glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody (GFAP; cat. no. PAB18435; 1:500; Abnova, Tapei, Taiwan). Other materials included the tumor cell line U87 (U-87 MG ATCC® HTB14™; cat. no. CBP60299; Nanjing Ke Bai Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), 0.01% poly-lysine, 0.25% trypsin, GSI II (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA), and Triton-X100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA).

Culture of TSCs

The tumor cell line U87 (2×106) was added to the culture media (DMEM/F12) of neural stem cells and cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. The media was intermittently exchanged (2–3 days) for 2-week culture period until spherical TSCs were observed, and immunofluorescence was performed for identification.

Immunofluorescence

TSCs (1×105) were seeded onto slides with polylysine pretreatment, 1 ml of 10% acetone was added, and the slides were placed at −20°C for 10 min. Next, the slices were soaked with 0.1% Triton-X100 at room temperature for 1 h, gently rinsed and soaked in 5% goat serum (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.) at 20°C for 1 h. The CD133 and Nestin antibodies were added to different groups of slides labeled Group A (CD133) and B (Nestin), and then incubated at 4°C for 24 h. Next, 1 ml 1% Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody was added to group A and 1 ml 1% FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit antibody was added to group B. Following an incubation at room temperature overnight, the slices were mounted with glycerol and cell staining was observed under a fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×200). To the control group, neural stem cell culture medium was added to replace the CD133 and Nestin antibodies; the other steps were identical to those described previously.

Differentiation induction of TSCs

Cultured TSCs were transferred into 10% FBS-containing 24-well culture plates, and cultured at 37°C for ~10 days to observe their growth. When the TSCs clusters appeared as differentiated wall-adherent cells after ~10 days, immunofluorescence was performed to identify the cells; the primary antibody was changed to GFAP, and the secondary antibody was FITC, and the remaining steps were conducted as described previously.

Impact of GSI II on TSC growth

Cultured U87 cells were gently dispersed using a pipette and the concentration was adjusted to 105 cells/ml with 10% FBS. Next, 2 ml cell suspension was added to each well of 6-well culture plates (the bottom of each plate had been evenly coated with 0.01% poly-lysine); culture was conducted in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 days until the cells had completely adhered to the walls, after which the culture solution was removed. Stem cell culture medium (2 ml) was added and the four plates were labeled A1, A2, B1 and B2. Next, 0.01 MPBS was added to A1 and A2 as the control group, and GSI II (0.2 µg per well) was added to B1 and B2 to observe changes in growth and the number of cell clusters in each culture plate was recorded. After a 20-day culture in the previously described culture conditions, the culture plates were directly stained as previously described.

Statistical analysis

The number of Nestin-positive cell clusters was recorded and SPSS 10.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform an analysis of variance followed by Fisher's least significant difference to compare the differences between different groups.

Results

Cells differentiated from U87 cells

The U87 cells were extracted and cultured in neural stem cell culture medium; after 2 days, wall-adherent cells began to grow in a cluster shape. After 4 days, the cell clusters gradually increased in volume and began to appear spherical in shape (Fig. 1). The spherical cells were re-dispersed and seeded into neural stem cell culture medium. Several days later, spherical cell structures had reformed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Cell ball after 10-day culture (magnification, ×400).

Positive staining under a fluorescence microscope

Fluorescence microscopy revealed that the cell clusters in groups A and B exhibited red (Fig. 2) and green fluorescence, (Fig. 3), indicating that the CD133 and Nestin antigens were located inside the cells. The cell clusters were then placed into FBS medium for 10-day culture. Some cell clusters became wall-adherent again and presented a spindle shape; the cells also showed a high proliferation rate (Fig. 4). The wall-adherent cells, which were differentiated near the adjacent cell clusters, gradually exhibited cord-like connections (Fig. 5). The differentiated cells were positive for GFAP staining (Fig. 6) and showed the same characteristics as glial cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cell ball with positive cluster of differentiation 133 staining via fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×200).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Performance of positive Nestin staining in fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×200).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Differentiated wall-adherent tumor cells (magnification, ×200).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The differentiated cells exhibited cord-like connection (magnification, ×200).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The differentiated cells exhibited positive GFAP staining using fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×400).

Comparison of TSC growth rates between the 2 groups

The proliferation rates of cells in groups B1 and B2, which were incubated with GSI II, were significantly lower than those in the control groups A1 and A2 (P<0.01, Table I). Single stem cell clusters were positive for Nestin staining (Fig. 7), which confirmed the cells were tumor stem cells.

Table I.

The numbers of Nestin-positive cell clusters of the 2 groups.

Group Numbers of Nestin-positive cell clusters mean ± SD t P-value
Control group (A1+A2) 13 12 13 10 14 12 16   9 14 12   6 14 16 8 11 10 15 7 11.78±2.96 2.83 <0.05
Experimental group (B1+B2) 11 10   9 10 12 10   7 11 13   9 11 11   7 9   6   8   6 9   9.39±2.96

SD, standard deviation; t, the statistical value.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Nestin-positive cell cluster form in single-well culture using fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×400).

Discussion

Brain tumors have been suggested to originate from glial cells containing gene mutations that undergo differentiation and maturation (25). The study of Hu et al (26) suggested that TSCs are present inside tumor tissues and that these cells can proliferate and differentiate into tumor cells. The study of Alamgeer et al (27) extracted and cultured tumor cells from lung and breast cancer and found TSCs showed differentiation ability. Fong et al (28) cultured spherical TSCs from mouse TSCs and found that both TSC types could grow in a suspension in culture media and retained the ability to differentiate into tumor cells after several passages. In the study of Lucarelli et al (29) tumor tissues were extracted from high-degree malignant tumors and the cell clusters that exhibited a similar growth state as stem cells were cultured. These previous studies only indirectly revealed the existence of TSCs, as no specific antigens were available for TSCs. At present, there are two principal markers that can be used for this purpose, including CD133, which is a transmembrane protein specific to neural stem cells and the majority of previous studies have used CD133 in order to identify glioma stem cells (28,29). CD133 is highly expressed in glioma cells, and the ratio of CD133+ cells in glioma was demonstrated to be associated with the pathological type and prognosis (30). The other antigen used is against Nestin, a cytoskeletal protein that supports neural stem cells and is specific to neural stem cells (31). The U87 cell line was used in the present study, after several passages, neural stem cells were mixed with U87 cells, and these cells were used for the immunofluorescent identification of cell clusters as TSCs.

TSCs can proliferate and differentiate into tumor cells, and if the intermediate link is blocked, tumor growth can be inhibited (32). Notch1 is highly expressed in glioma cells and is closely associated with a tumor's pathological grade (33). GSI II effectively inhibits Notch1 signal activation (34). In the present study, GSI II was demonstrated to effectively inhibit TSC generation in U87 cells (P<0.05); additionally, a recent study demonstrated that the resistance of TSCs towards the tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand could be induced, and its activation may increase the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs (35).

Although a previous study demonstrated that the U87 cell line is not authentic to the tumor of the original cell established in the University of Uppsala in 1968, it is also a glioblastoma cell line (36). The purpose of the present study was to isolate and cultivate TSCs, and examine the effect of GSI II on the growth and differentiation of TSCs. Therefore, the U87 cell line from ATCC or the U87 cell line from Uppsala University could be used in the present study and without affecting the results.

The present study provides a foundation for developing therapeutics for the treatment of glioma. The selective killing of TSCs in brain tumors may prevent tumor recurrence and metastasis, providing a means for curing or preventing tumor recurrence and metastasis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant no. ZR2012HM084).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

XDD and CQD conceived and designed the study. XDD, CQD, FW, WSD, MMY, QHM and PS performed the experiments. XDD and MMY conducted the statistical analysis. XDD and CQD wrote the paper. PS reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Lowenstein PR, Castro MG. Evolutionary basis of a new gene- and immune-therapeutic approach for the treatment of malignant brain tumors: From mice to clinical trials for glioma patients. Clin Immunol. 2018;189:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baker GJ, Yadav VN, Motsch S, Koschmann C, Calinescu AA, Mineharu Y, Camelo-Piragua SI, Orringer D, Bannykh S, Nichols WS, et al. Mechanisms of glioma formation: Iterative perivascular glioma growth and invasion leads to tumor progression, VEGF-independent vascularization, and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy. Neoplasia. 2014;16:543–561. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakano I, Kornblum HI. Methods for analysis of brain tumor stem cell and neural stem cell self-renewal. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;568:37–56. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-280-9_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Turner JD, Sanai N. A brain tumor stem cell origin for glioblastoma endothelium. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:574–575. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khan IS, Ehtesham M. Isolation and characterization of stem cells from human central nervous system malignancies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;853:33–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16537-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bryukhovetskiy A, Shevchenko V, Kovalev S, Chekhonin V, Baklaushev V, Bryukhovetskiy I, Zhukova M. To the novel paradigm of proteome-based cell therapy of tumors: Through comparative proteome mapping of tumor stem cells and tissue-specific stem cells of humans. Cell Transplant. 2014;23(Suppl 1):S151–S170. doi: 10.3727/096368914X684907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toda M. Identification of antigen against brain tumor stem cell and application for treatment of glioma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2010;37:1016–1018. (In Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tanaka S, Louis DN, Curry WT, Batchelor TT, Dietrich J. Diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for glioblastoma: No longer a dead end? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:14–26. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lathia JD, Li M, Hall PE, Gallagher J, Hale JS, Wu Q, Venere M, Levy E, Rani MR, Huang P, et al. Laminin alpha 2 enables glioblastoma stem cell growth. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:766–778. doi: 10.1002/ana.23674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sherriff J, Tamangani J, Senthil L, Cruickshank G, Spooner D, Jones B, Brookes C, Sanghera P. Patterns of relapse in glioblastoma multiforme following concomitant chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide. Br J Radiol. 2013;86:20120414. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neradil J, Veselska R. Nestin as a marker of cancer stem cells. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:803–811. doi: 10.1111/cas.12691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tampaki EC, Nakopoulou L, Tampakis A, Kontzoglou K, Weber WP, Kouraklis G. Nestin involvement in tissue injury and cancer-a potential tumor marker? Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2014;37:305–315. doi: 10.1007/s13402-014-0193-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yiming L, Yunshan G, Bo M, Yu Z, Tao W, Gengfang L, Dexian F, Shiqian C, Jianli J, Juan T, Zhinan C. CD133 overexpression correlates with clinicopathological features of gastric cancer patients and its impact on survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:42019–42027. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kemper K, Grandela C, Medema JP. Molecular identification and targeting of colorectal cancer stem cells. Oncotarget. 2010;1:387–395. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garcia A, Kandel JJ. Notch: A key regulator of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27:151–156. doi: 10.14670/hh-27.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ye L, Wang C, Yu G, Jiang Y, Sun D, Zhang Z, Yu X, Li X, Wei W, Liu P, et al. Bmi-1 induces radioresistance by suppressing senescence in human U87 glioma cells. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:2601–2606. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilson NH, Stoeckli ET. Sonic Hedgehog regulates Wnt activity during neural circuit formation. Vitam Horm. 2012;88:173–209. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394622-5.00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Foldynová-Trantírková S, Sekyrová P, Tmejová K, Brumovská E, Bernatík O, Blankenfeldt W, Krejcí P, Kozubík A, Dolezal T, Trantírek L, Bryja V. Breast cancer-specific mutations in CK1epsilon inhibit Wnt/beta-catenin and activate the Wnt/Rac1/JNK and NFAT pathways to decrease cell adhesion and promote cell migration. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R30. doi: 10.1186/bcr2581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Izraeli S, Lowe LA, Bertness VL, Campaner S, Hahn H, Kirsch IR, Kuehn MR. Genetic evidence that Sil is required for the Sonic Hedgehog response pathway. Genesis. 2001;31:72–77. doi: 10.1002/gene.10004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jin X, Jeon HM, Jin X, Kim EJ, Yin J, Jeon HY, Sohn YW, Oh SY, Kim JK, Kim SH, et al. The ID1-CULLIN3 axis regulates intracellular SHH and WNT signaling in glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2016;16:1629–1641. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Filbin MG, Dabral SK, Pazyra-Murphy MF, Ramkissoon S, Kung AL, Pak E, Chung J, Theisen MA, Sun Y, Franchetti Y, et al. Coordinate activation of Shh and PI3K signaling in PTEN-deficient glioblastoma: New therapeutic opportunities. Nat Med. 2013;19:1518–1523. doi: 10.1038/nm.3328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhou QZ, Zhang G, Long HB, Lei F, Ye F, Jia XF, Zhou YL, Kang JP, Feng DX. Effect of spinal cord extracts after spinal cord injury on proliferation of rat embryonic neural stem cells and Notch signal pathway in vitro. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7:562–567. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60094-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen CY, Liao W, Lou YL, Li Q, Hu B, Wang Y, Deng ZF. Inhibition of Notch signaling facilitates the differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells into neural stem cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;395:291–298. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2168-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saito N, Fu J, Zheng S, Yao J, Wang S, Liu DD, Yuan Y, Sulman EP, Lang FF, Colman H, et al. A high Notch pathway activation predicts response to γ secretase inhibitors in proneural subtype of glioma tumor-initiating cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32:301–312. doi: 10.1002/stem.1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Glass R, Synowitz M. CNS macrophages and peripheral myeloid cells in brain tumours. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128:347–362. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1274-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu M, Xiang FX, He YF. Are cancer stem cells the sole source of tumor? J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2014;34:621–625. doi: 10.1007/s11596-014-1327-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alamgeer M, Peacock CD, Matsui W, Ganju V, Watkins DN. Cancer stem cells in lung cancer: Evidence and controversies. Respirology. 2013;18:757–764. doi: 10.1111/resp.12094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fong D, Yeh A, Naftalovich R, Choi TH, Chan MM. Curcumin inhibits the side population (SP) phenotype of the rat C6 glioma cell line: Towards targeting of cancer stem cells with phytochemicals. Cancer Lett. 2010;293:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lucarelli G, Galleggiante V, Rutigliano M, Vavallo A, Ditonno P, Battaglia M. Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells in renal cell carcinoma. Urologia. 2015;82:46–53. doi: 10.5301/uro.5000099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lehnus KS, Donovan LK, Huang X, Zhao N, Warr TJ, Pilkington GJ, An Q. CD133 glycosylation is enhanced by hypoxia in cultured glioma stem cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;42:1011–1017. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brazel CY, Alaythan AA, Felling RJ, Calderon F, Levison SW. Molecular features of neural stem cells enable their enrichment using pharmacological inhibitors of survival-promoting kinases. J Neurochem. 2014;128:376–390. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tamura K, Aoyagi M, Ando N, Ogishima T, Wakimoto H, Yamamoto M, Ohno K. Expansion of CD133-positive glioma cells in recurrent de novo glioblastomas after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:1145–1155. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.JNS122417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fang KM, Lin TC, Chan TC, Ma SZ, Tzou BC, Chang WR, Liu JJ, Chiou SH, Yang CS, Tzeng SF. Enhanced cell growth and tumorigenicity of rat glioma cells by stable expression of human CD133 through multiple molecular actions. Glia. 2013;61:1402–1417. doi: 10.1002/glia.22521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim SH, Singh SV. Mammary cancer chemoprevention by withaferin A is accompanied by in vivo suppression of self-renewal of cancer stem cells. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2014;7:738–747. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang X, Chen T, Zhang J, Mao Q, Li S, Xiong W, Qiu Y, Xie Q, Ge J. Notch1 promotes glioma cell migration and invasion by stimulating β-catenin and NF-κB signaling via AKT activation. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiao YG, Wang W, Gong D, Mao ZF. γ-Secretase inhibitor DAPT attenuates intimal hyperplasia of vein grafts by inhibition of Notch1 signaling. Lab Invest. 2014;94:654–662. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES