Skip to main content
Chinese Medical Journal logoLink to Chinese Medical Journal
letter
. 2018 Oct 20;131(20):2499–2502. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.243553

Prediction of Short-Term Mortality after Valve Surgery: A Single Center's Perspective

Liang-Wei Chen 1, Jie Chen 1, Jun-Nan Zheng 1, Yi-Ni Ke 2, Qi-Feng Zhu 3, Yi-Ming Ni 1, Hai-Ge Zhao 1,
PMCID: PMC6202604  PMID: 30334539

To the Editor: Valve stenosis and regurgitation can lead to a series of symptoms, including chest distress and dyspnea. Valve replacement is an effective surgical procedure that improves patients’ quality of life and life span and has played an increasingly important role in treating mitral valve diseases. Previous studies have reported different risk factors and independent predictors of increased mortality in patients with mitral valve replacement (MVR) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR).[1,2,3] This study retrospectively reviewed data on patients undergoing valve surgery to determine the risk factors and predictors of short-term mortality in this patient population.

The data of 1254 patients who underwent valve surgery from January 2014 to December 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were reviewed. Patients with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were included, while those with concomitant aortic dissection surgery or complex congenital heart disease surgery were excluded. Clinical, echocardiographic, and surgical data from the electronic medical records were reviewed. Short-term mortality was defined as all-cause death during or within 30 days of surgery. The patients, who underwent preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), electrocardiography (ECG), and coronary artery imaging, mostly received a coronary computed tomography angiogram (CTA) to get useful data. Patients with abnormal coronary CTA results or a high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) required a coronary angiogram.

The 99% of the patients (1242 of 1254) included in the study underwent surgical procedures through a median sternotomy followed by a cardiopulmonary bypass with systemic hypothermia (central temperature: 28°C–32°C). Concomitant CABG was performed in 35 patients. Valve function was confirmed through TTE after they had been weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson's Chi-square tests were used to compare inhospital mortality rates between groups. All multivariate analyses were performed with P < 0.05 as the limit on univariate analysis for entering or removing variables. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Among the 1254 patients who underwent valve surgery, 25 (2.0%) short-term deaths were recorded. The causes of death were cardiac failure (8 patients), multiple system failure (7 patients), cerebral infarction (4 patients), thoracic incision infection (3 patients), renal failure (2 patients), and fatal arrhythmia (1 patient). Patients’ baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Patients with a New York Heart Association (NYHA)-4 experienced significantly higher postsurgery mortality (15.0% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001). Compared to nonsmoking patients, patients with a smoking history also had increased mortality (5.0% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001), as did those with a history of CHD (7.4% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.042). A low ejection fraction (EF) (<50.0%, P < 0.001), moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (P = 0.021), and tricuspid regurgitation (P = 0.012) discovered by ECG were all found to be risk factors for valve surgery. Patients with a history of cardiac surgery had a higher mortality rate (9.4% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.002), and those who underwent valve surgeries with concomitant CABG or reoperation for major bleeding or pericardial tamponade had a significantly higher rate as well (8.6% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.005, and 22.2% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001; respectively).

Table 1.

Patients’ clinical characteristics and short-term mortality in this study (N = 1254), n (%)

Items Number Short-term mortality χ2 P
Age
 <60 years 690 (55.0) 12 (1.7) 0.51 0.476
 ≥60 years 564 (45.0) 15 (2.7)
Gender
 Male 563 (44.9) 12 (2.1) 0.10 0.753
 Female 691 (55.1) 13 (1.9)
BMI 0.01 0.940
 <24 kg/m2 844 (67.3) 17 (2.0)
 ≥24 kg/m2 410 (32.7) 8 (2.0)
NYHA-4
 No 1234 (98.4) 22 (1.8) 17.60 <0.001
 Yes 20 (1.6) 3 (15.0)
Renal dysfunction
 No 1226 (97.8) 25 (2.0) 0.58 0.445
 Yes 28 (2.2) 0 (0.0)
Diabetes
 No 1200 (95.7) 24 (2.0) 0.01 0.907
 Yes 54 (4.3) 1 (1.9)
Hypertension
 No 986 (78.6) 21 (2.1) 0.44 0.508
 Yes 268 (21.4) 4 (1.5)
Smoker
 No 1094 (87.2) 17 (1.6) 8.48 0.004
 Yes 160 (12.8) 8 (5.0)
Peripheral vascular disease
 No 1221 (97.4) 25 (2.1) 0.69 0.406
 Yes 33 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Cerebrovascular disease
 No 1233 (98.3) 25 (2.0) 0.43 0.510
 Yes 21 (1.7) 0 (0.0)
Coronary heart disease symptom
 No 1227 (97.9) 23 (1.9) 4.14 0.042
 Yes 27 (2.1) 2 (7.4)
Atrial fibrillation
 No 794 (63.3) 19 (2.4) 1.77 0.184
 Yes 460 (36.7) 6 (1.3)
Ejection fraction
 ≥50% 1169 (93.2) 17 (1.5) 25.68 <0.001
 <50% 85 (6.8) 8 (9.4)
Previous cardiac surgery
 No 1222 (97.4) 22 (1.8) 9.16 0.002
 Yes 32 (2.6) 3 (9.4)
Mitral stenosis
 No 638 (50.9) 15 (2.4) 0.85 0.357
 Yes 616 (49.1) 10 (1.6)
Mitral regurgitation
 No or mild 780 (62.2) 10 (1.3) 5.35 0.021
 Moderate or severe 474 (37.8) 15 (3.2)
Mitral valve operation
 No 325 (25.9) 5 (1.5) 0.47 0.495
 Yes 929 (74.1) 20 (2.2)
Mitral valve replacement
 No 108 (11.6) 0 (0.0) 2.69 0.101
 Yes 821 (88.4) 20 (2.4)
Mitral valve repair
 No 821 (88.4) 20 (2.4) 2.69 0.101
 Yes 108 (11.6) 0 (0.0)
Aortic stenosis
 No 868 (69.2) 16 (1.8) 0.33 0.568
 Yes 386 (30.8) 9 (2.3)
Aortic regurgitation
 No or mild 797 (63.6) 17 (2.1) 0.22 0.641
 Moderate or severe 457 (36.4) 8 (1.8)
Aortic valve operation
 No 581 (46.3) 13 (2.2) 0.33 0.566
 Yes 673 (53.7) 12 (1.9)
Tricuspid stenosis
 No 1253 (99.9) 25 (2.0) 0.02 0.887
 Yes 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0)
Tricuspid regurgitation
 No or mild 1072 (85.5) 17 (1.6) 6.29 0.012
 Moderate or severe 182 (14.5) 8 (4.4)
Tricuspid repair
 No 996 (79.4) 20 (2.0) 0.01 0.943
 Yes 258 (20.6) 5 (1.9)
Nonelective surgery
 No 1246 (99.4) 25 (2.0) 0.16 0.686
 Yes 8 (0.6) 0 (0.0)
Biological valve
 No 978 (78.0) 19 (1.9) 0.06 0.808
 Yes 276 (22.0) 6 (2.2)
Mechanical valve
 No 397 (31.7) 6 (1.5) 0.69 0.406
 Yes 857 (68.3) 19 (2.2)
Concomitant CABG
 No 1219 (97.2) 22 (1.8) 7.97 0.005
 Yes 35 (2.8) 3 (8.6)
Reoperation
 No 1236 (98.6) 21 (1.7) 38.25 <0.001
 Yes 18 (1.4) 4 (22.2)

CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; NYHA: New York Heart Association.

Based on univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression analyses of inhospital mortality showing NYHA-4 (odds ratio [OR]: 8.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1–36.2, P = 0.003), smoking history (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.5–9.3, P = 0.005), poor EF (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 2.2–13.5, P < 0.001), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 10.9, 95% CI: 2.6–46.2, P = 0.001), moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3–8.1, P = 0.012), and concomitant CABG (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.3–19.2, P = 0.020) to be potential risk factors for short-term mortality [Table 2].

Table 2.

Predictors of inhospital mortality by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


OR 95% CI P Coefficient OR 95% CI P
NYHA-4 9.7 2.7–35.6 0.001 2.2 8.7 2.1–36.2 0.003
Smoking history 3.3 1.4–7.9 0.006 1.3 3.7 1.5–9.3 0.005
CHD symptoms 4.2 0.9–18.7 0.061
EF <50% 5.4 2.3–12.9 <0.001 1.7 5.5 2.2–13.5 <0.001
Previous cardiac surgery 9.7 2.7–35.6 0.001 2.4 10.9 2.6–46.2 0.001
Mitral regurgitation 2.5 1.1–5.6 0.028
Tricuspid regurgitation 2.9 1.2–6.7 0.016 1.2 3.2 1.3–8.1 0.012
Concomitant CABG 4.9 1.4–17.3 0.013 1.6 5.0 1.3–19.2 0.020

CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; CI: Confidence interval; CHD: Coronary heart disease; EF: Ejection fraction; NYHA: New York Heart Association; OR: Odds ratio.

Over 200,000 patients suffer from chest distress, dyspnea, and poor mobility caused by morphological defects of the heart valves in China every year and are recommended for valve surgery. AVR and MVR are the classic treatments for most patients with heart valve disease (HVD), but the ratio of mitral valvuloplasty has been increased in recent years. This study directly evaluated the pre- and postoperative risk factors for short-term mortality in Chinese patients who underwent valve surgery. We thought that these identified risk factors are very important due to the particular characteristics of the East Asian population, such as a different etiology from the Western population and less stringent postsurgery anticoagulation requirements. This study included a total of 1254 patients who underwent valve surgery in single center. The unadjusted short-term mortality of this study was 2.0%. As expected, preoperative NYHA-4, smoking, poor EF, previous cardiac surgery, moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation, and concomitant CABG were independent risk factors for short-term mortality. Previous research has reported the similar findings.[1,2] In addition, 18 patients who received reoperation owing to major bleeding or pericardial tamponade accounted for 22.2% of the mortality in our sample.

Several studies have shown that age was an independent risk factor for short-term mortality.[1,2] However, the results of this study suggested no strong correlation between age and short-term mortality. Only 11.5% of the patients in this study were over 70 years old, in which there were patients with NYHA-4 and just one with an EF <30% (data not shown). Due to the low proportion of old-age patients in this study, it was insufficient to conclude that older patients who underwent valve surgery were at greater risk than the younger patients.

With regard to the causes of short-term mortality, only 24.0% of the deaths in this study (6 out of 25) were related to atrial fibrillation, which was found in 36.7% of the patients. These patients with atrial fibrillation accounted for only 1.6% of the deaths following value surgery. Hence, there was insufficient evidence to identify atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for increased mortality. As a result, in concordance with other research,[4] we concluded that atrial fibrillation was not a risk factor for increased mortality, although several studies have cited it as a postvalue surgery risk factor, which influenced perioperative mortality.[2]

Previous studies have developed preoperative risk assessment models for valve operations, mostly were intended for populations in the USA.[2,5] These models might not be well suitable for patients in China or Asia because of the differences in demographic characteristics. In this study, such factors such as age, gender, renal dysfunction, diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation did not make a statistically significant contribution to short-term mortality following valve surgery.

The study had several limitations that should be noticed. First of all, the sample size was not large enough to generalize all obtained variables. Between-factor crosstalk also cannot be ruled out. Second, our data were extracted from a single center, which may not represent the actual short-term mortality in the Zhejiang region. Finally, the variables included in this study were not exhaustive of all variables that potentially affect mortality.

In conclusion, this study statistically analyzed NYHA-4, smoking history, poor EF, previous cardiac surgery, moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation, and concomitant CABG to be the independent risk factors for short-term mortality in patients who had undergone valve surgery in Zhejiang of China. It helps cardiac surgeons to evaluate the short-term mortality of valve surgeries due to the special demographic characteristics of HVD patients here.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Edited by: Xin Chen

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nowicki ER, Birkmeyer NJ, Weintraub RW, Leavitt BJ, Sanders JH, Dacey LJ, et al. Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1966–77. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.035. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taylor NE, O’Brien S, Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Bridges CR. Relationship between race and mortality and morbidity after valve replacement surgery. Circulation. 2005;111:1305–12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157737.92938.D8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157737.92938.D8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation. 1995;91:1022–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.4.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou YM, Li MJ, Zhou YL, Ma LL, Yi X. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), novel biomarker for assessing atrial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:21201–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Jamieson WR, Shroyer ALW, et al. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:885–92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01202-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES