Abstract
The data presented in this article shows the microarray based transcriptome profiles of ∆lon and ∆lon rpoB12 strains of Escherichia coli. The rif mutation namely, rpoB12 was isolated spontaneously in the background of ∆lon strain (over-produces colanic acid capsular polysaccharide) as a suppressor for over-production of colanic acid capsular polysaccharide (Meenakshi and Munavar, 2015) [1]. The E. coli strains were grown in LB medium at 30 °C overnight in duplicates. Total RNA from each samples were isolated and microarray based transcriptome profiles were studied and compared. The detailed methodology and data are given in this article. The interpretation of these data are discussed in the research article, “Evidence for Up and Down Regulation of 450 genes by rpoB12 (rif) Mutation and their Implications in Complexity of Transcription Modulation in Escherichia coli” (Meenakshi and Munavar, 2018) [2].
Keywords: ∆lon, rpoB12, Capsule, Biofilm, Motility, Stress response
Specifications table
| Subject area | Biology |
| More specificsubject area | Microbial Molecular Biology |
| Type of data | Table, transcriptome data |
| How data was acquired | The data from the images were extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction software version 11.5.1.1 and the extracted raw data was analyzed using Agilent GeneSpring GX version 12.0. The data were normalized using 75th percentile shift in comparison with the control sample. |
| Data format | Analyzed data. |
| Experimental factors | Escherichia coli strains namely SG20780 (∆lon) and MMR6 (∆lon rpoB12) are used as samples. |
| Experimental features | Above said E.coli strains were grown in LB for overnight and sub-cultured to attain mid-log phase at 30 °C. Total RNA was isolated and subjected for Microarray based transcriptome analysis. |
| Data source location | Tamil Nadu, India. |
| Data accessibility | Data are available in this article |
| Related research article | “Evidence for Up and Down Regulation of 450 genes by rpoB12 (rif) Mutation and their Implications in Complexity of Transcription Modulation in Escherichia coli” [2]. |
Value of data
-
•
This is perhaps the first report showing the genome-wide expression of a rif (rpoB) mutant of E. coli. The data clearly gives explanation for the pleiotropic phenotype associated with rpoB12 (His526Tyr) mutation that are reported earlier.
-
•
Data reported herein shows that a certain group of genes are getting up regulated and certain other group of genes are getting down regulated while the expression of many a genes are unaltered. This observation portrays a vital role for the specific promoter elements/its associated factors along with the fast moving RNA polymerase, which in combination might result in modulation of expression of genes.
-
•
The rpoB12 mutation reported herein has already been reported by many research groups in different contexts more specifically, His426Tyr change has been reported in higher frequency in Mycobacterium when exposed to Rifampicin [3], [4], [5]. Therefore, the data presented here gives clue for the association of this rif mutation with virulence and Rif resistance.
-
•
Since E. coli and other pathogenic microbes such as Salmonella, Pseudomonas, Mycobacteria, Erwinia etc., share higher percentage of homology [6], [7], [8], this data would be immensely helpful to understand pathogenesis and antimicrobial resistance in these pathogenic microbes.
1. Data
The rif mutation namely, rpoB12 is identical to the previously reported rif mutation, rpoB2 [3]. This mutation is reported to be associated with pleiotropic phenotype in E. coli [1], [9]. Since rpoB12 mutation (His526Tyr) was found to be clinically relevant, microarray based transcriptome profile was studied in this rif mutant. The analysed data of the above said experiment is presented in this article (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of the microarray data analyses.
| Name of the strains | Sample | No. of. Genes up regulated | No. of. Genes down regulated |
|---|---|---|---|
| SG20780 | Control | NA | NA |
| SG2078_R | Control (Replicate) | ||
| MMR6 | Test | 753 | 643 |
| MMR6_R | Test (Replicate) |
2. Experimental design, materials and methods
2.1. Growth conditions of bacterial cultures
Overnight grown cultures of SG20780 (∆lon cps-lac) and MMR6 (∆lon cps-lac rpoB12) were sub-cultured in duplicates and the mid-log phase cultures were used for the microarray experiment. Refer [2] for more details.
2.2. RNA extraction
Given below is the brief summary of methods followed by the company; Isolation of RNA from E. coli was carried out by using combination of Trizol and Qiagen RNeasy mini kit with DNase treatment (Cat # 74106).
2.3. RNA quality control
The concentration and purity of the RNA were evaluated using the Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; 1000). The value of Abs260/280 for the samples ranged from 1.8 to 2. The value of Abs260/230 ranged from 1.5 to 1.8. The integrity of the RNA samples were analysed on the Bioanalyzer (Agilent; 2100). The RNA integrity number of the samples ranged from 8 to 10.
2.4. Labelling
The samples for Gene expression were labelled using Agilent Quick-Amp labelling Kit (p/n5190-0442). 500 ng each of total RNA were reverse transcribed at 40 °C using primer mix of random hexamer and oligo-dT primer tagged to a T7 polymerase promoter and converted to double stranded cDNA. Synthesized double stranded cDNA molecules were used as template for cRNA generation. cRNA was generated by in vitro transcription and the dye Cy3 CTP(Agilent) was incorporated during this step. The cDNA synthesis and in vitro transcription steps were carried out at 40 °C. Labelled cRNA was cleaned up using Qiagen RNeasy columns (Qiagen, Cat no.: 74106) and quality assessed for yields and specific activity using the Nanodrop ND-1000.
2.5. Hybridization and scanning
1000 ng of labelled cRNA sample were fragmented at 60 °C and hybridized on to a Genotypic designed E coli_8 × 15K (AMADID: 020304). Fragmentation of labelled cRNA and hybridization were done using the Gene Expression Hybridization kit (Agilent Technologies, in situ Hybridization kit, Part no. 5190-0404). Hybridization was carried out in Agilent׳s Surehyb Chambers at 65 °C for 16 h. The hybridized slides were washed using Agilent Gene Expression wash buffers (Agilent Technologies, Part no. 5188-5327) and scanned using the Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies, Part no. G2600D).
2.6. Feature extraction
Data extraction from Images was done using Feature Extraction software Version 11.5.1.1 of Agilent.
2.7. Microarray data analysis
Feature extracted raw data was analyzed using GeneSpring GX Version 12.0 software from Agilent. Normalization of the data was done in GeneSpring GX using the 75th percentile shift and normalized to Specific control Samples (Percentile shift normalization is a global normalization, where the locations of all the spot intensities in an array are adjusted. This normalization takes each column in an experiment independently, and computes the nth percentile of the expression values for this array, across all spots (where n has a range from 0 to 100 and n = 75 is the median, it subtracts this value from the expression value of each entity)). Significant genes up and down regulated in the test samples with respect to control sample were identified. Statistical T-test p-value was calculated based on volcano Plot. Differentially regulated genes were clustered using hierarchical clustering based on Pearson coefficient correlation algorithm to identify significant gene expression patterns among the three different conditions. Genes were also classified based on functional category and pathways using DAVID database tool.
Acknowledgements
We thank Genotypic Technology, Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India for the microarray experiment. We thank the common programs namely, UGC-CAS and CEGS, DBT-IPLS given to School of Biological Sciences, DST-PURSE and UGC-UPE given to Madurai Kamaraj University for the financial assistance. SM thanks Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Govt. of India for providing Junior and Senior Research Fellowships.
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.020.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.020.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
Supplementary material
Appendix A. Supplementary material
The analysed data of the differentially regulated genes in MS Excel Format.
References
- 1.Meenakshi S., Munavar M.H. Suppression of capsule expression in ΔIon strain of Escherichia coli by two novel rpoB mutations in concert with H-NS: possible role for DNA bending at rcsA promoter. Microbiol. Open. 2015;4(5):712–729. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meenakshi S., Munavar M.H. Evidence for up and down regulation of 450 genes by rpoB12 (rif) mutation and their implications in complexity of transcription modulation in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Res. 2018;212–213:80–93. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yanofsky C., Horn V. Rifampicin resistance mutations that alter the efficiency of transcription termination at the tryptophan attenuator. J. Bacteriol. 1981;145:1334–1341. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.3.1334-1341.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jin D.J., Gross C.A. Mapping and sequencing of mutations in the Escherichia coli rpoB gene that lead to rifampicin resistance. J. Mol. Biol. 1988;202:45–58. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90517-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adekambi T., Drancourt M., Raoult D. The rpoB gene as a tool for clinical microbiologists. Trends Microbiol. 2008;17(1):37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Campbell E.A., Korzheva N., Mustaev A., Murakami K., Nair S., Goldfarb A., Darst S.A. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell. 2001;104:901–912. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao W., Cameron D.R., Davies J.K., Kostoulias X., Stepnell J., Tuck K.L., Yeaman M.R., Peleg A.Y., Stinear T.P., Howden B.P. The RpoBH481Y rifampicin resistance mutation and an active stringent response reduce virulence and increase resistance to innate immune responses in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207(6):929–939. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goldstein B.P. Resistance to rifampicin: a review. J. Antibiot. 2014:1–6. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jin D.J., Gross C.A. Characterization of the pleiotropic phenotypes of rifampicin-resistant rpoB mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1989;171:5229–5231. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.9.5229-5231.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material
The analysed data of the differentially regulated genes in MS Excel Format.
