Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated polyneuropathy, often preceded by an illness. It is a self-limiting illness in most of the cases, but recurrence is rare and can be seen in about 1%–6% of patients. GBS is characterised by progressive, symmetrical, proximal and distal weakness. Areflexia and sensory disturbances are also common. Patients with GBS usually have albuminocytological dissociation on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. This is a case of a 69-year-old woman with recurrent GBS and normal CSF findings.
Keywords: neurology (drugs and medicines), general practice / family medicine, immunology, peripheral nerve disease
Background
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare autoimmune neuropathy that is considered to be a monophasic illness. However, recurrence of GBS can be seen in about 1%–6% of the cases. One of the classical findings in the setting of GBS is the albuminocytological dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (high protein in the setting of normal cell count), and the lack of such is also not common. We present a case of recurrent GBS that did not have albuminocytological dissociation both at the initial presentation and during the recurrence. Our case demonstrates the importance of good clinical history, physical and electrophysiological examination, and a low index of suspicion in identifying such a rare presentation.
Case presentation
A 69-year-old woman presented with bilateral lower extremity weakness and sensory disturbances in April 2018. She had a similar episode in January 2017.
A 69-year-old woman was admitted with subacute onset of bilateral upper and lower limb weakness and numbness for 3 weeks in January 2017. These symptoms were preceded by an upper respiratory tract infection. She had difficulty with walking, getting out of the chair, shuffling her feet, near falling and imbalance. There was no dysphagia, dysarthria, respiratory difficulty and bowel/bladder involvement. Physical examination showed a 4/5 Medical Research Council (MRC) grade strength in all the limbs with areflexia in bilateral upper and lower extremities. Sensory examination showed diminished sensation to pinprick in bilateral glove and stocking distribution.
Nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were performed 4 weeks after symptoms onset, and it was consistent with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy (GBS) (table 1) (figure 1). CSF analysis was also performed during the same time and was normal (table 2). She was started on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) 0.4 g/kg for 5 days which showed significant subjective improvement in the lower extremity weakness, and she was able to ambulate using a walker. Her MRC grade strength at discharge was 5/5 throughout although she still had minimal tingling sensation in both hands and feet at the time of discharge.
Table 1.
Comparison of nerve conduction studies during initial and recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome
| Nerve/sites | Recording site | Distal latency (ms) | Amplitude (mV) | Conduction velocity (m/s) | |
| Nerve conduction study during initial presentation of GBS in 2017: 1st episode | |||||
| Sensory nerve conduction study | |||||
| Median/wrist (right) | Digit II | – | – | – | |
| Sural/posterior calf (right/left) | Calf | – | – | – | |
| Motor nerve conduction study | |||||
| Median (right) | Wrist | APB | 5.9 (ref<4.2) | 2.2 (ref>4.0) | – |
| Elbow | APB | 13.8 | 1.8 | 29.3 | |
| Peroneal (right) | Ankle | EDB | 5.0 (ref<6.0) | 2.2 (ref>2.5) | – |
| Fibula | EDB | 15.7 | 0.5 | 31.0 | |
| Knee | EDB | 20.0 | 0.4 | 23.0 | |
| Tibial (right) | Ankle | AH | 16.0 (ref<6.6) | 1.0 (ref>2.0) | – |
| Knee | AH | 29.5 | 0.6 | 29.4 | |
| Nerve conduction study during recurrence of GBS in 2018: 2nd episode | |||||
| Sensory nerve conduction study | |||||
| Radial/forearm (left) | Snuff | – | – | – | |
| Sural/posterior calf (right/left) | Calf | – | – | – | |
| Motor nerve conduction study | |||||
| Median (left) | Wrist | APB | 5.1 (ref<4.2) | 3.1 (ref>4) | – |
| Elbow | APB | 14.8 | 1.5 | 24.7 | |
| Peroneal (left) | Ankle | EDB | 6.7 (ref<6) | 1.1 (ref>2.5) | – |
| Fibula | EDB | 17.2 | 0.2 | 32.8 | |
| Knee | EDB | 23.5 | 0.1 | 15.9 | |
| Tibial (left) | Ankle | AH | – | – | – |
| F-wave study | ||
| Nerve | M latency (ms) | F latency (ms) |
| Peroneal (right) | 6.4 | 61 |
| Reference | <57 | |
| Tibial (right) | 17.3 | 70.6 |
| Reference | <58 | |
| Median (left) | 6.7 | 25.0 |
| Reference | 31 | |
For sensory nerve conduction study, amplitude is measured peak-to-peak, the latency reported is the peak latency. For motor nerve conduction study, amplitude is measured baseline-to-peak, the latency reported is the distal onset latency. F-wave latency is the minimum latency.
Unless otherwise noted, the hand temperature was monitored continuously and remained between 32°C and 36°C, and the foot temperature was maintained between 30°C and 36°C during the performance of the nerve conduction study.
AH, abductor hallucis; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; EDB, extensor digitorum brevis; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; ref, reference.
Bold values are deviations from the stated reference values.
Figure 1.
Nerve conduction study during the first episode. (A) Shows motor nerve conduction study of the tibial nerve at ankle and knee. Conduction block is seen both at the ankle and knee (black arrows). (B) Shows nerve conduction study of the median motor nerve at elbow and wrist. Prolonged latency is seen at the elbow (red double-headed arrow). (C) Shows F-wave latency of the tibial nerve. It shows impersistence (red arrowheads).
Table 2.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings during initial presentation in 2017 and recurrence in 2018
| CSF profile | 2017—Initial GBS presentation | 2018—Recurrent GBS |
| CSF glucose (mg/dL) (normal: 40–70 mg/dL) |
65 | 60 |
| Proteins (mg/dL) (normal: 15–45 mg/dL) |
32 | 42 |
| White blood cells/L (normal: 0–5 X 106/L) |
3 X 106 | 0 |
| Neutrophils % | 9 | NP |
| Lymphocytes % | 91 | NP |
| Red blood cells (µL) | 12 | 1 |
GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; NP, not performed.
More than 1 year later, in April 2018, the patient was readmitted with subacute (14 days) onset of bilateral lower extremity weakness, numbness and paresthesias. Two months before the onset of symptoms, the patient had a gallbladder infection. On examination, there was generalised areflexia with an MRC grade muscle power of 4/5 in upper limbs and 2/5 in lower limbs. NCS was performed which showed evidence of a demyelinating polyneuropathy (table 1) (figure 2). CSF analysis was done, and it did not reveal albuminocytological dissociation (table 2). She was treated with IVIG 0.4 g/kg for 5 days without any improvement in the symptoms. Plasmapheresis was initiated and showed improvement on the following day. Her strength was 5/5 in the right upper extremity, 4/5 in the left upper extremity and 3/5 in lower extremities. Patellar reflexes were still absent in lower extremities bilaterally. Sensations were intact bilaterally at discharge.
Figure 2.
Nerve conduction study during the second episode. (A) Shows motor nerve conduction study of the median motor nerve at elbow and wrist. Temporal dispersion is seen at the elbow (red double-headed arrow). (B) Shows motor nerve conduction study of the peroneal nerve at ankle, head of fibula and the knee. Prolonged latency is seen at the ankle (black double-headed arrow). (C) Shows F-wave latency of the peroneal nerve. It shows prolonged latency, chronodispersion (black arrowheads) and impersistence (red brace).
Outcome and follow-up
On the first presentation of GBS, she showed significant subjective improvement with IVIG in the lower extremity weakness and was able to ambulate using a walker. Her MRC grade strength at discharge was 5/5 throughout.
During the second presentation, that is, recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome (RGBS), she showed improvement with plasmapheresis. Her strength on follow-up was 5/5 in the right upper extremity, 4/5 in the left upper extremity and 3/5 in lower extremities with intact sensations bilaterally.
DISCUSSION
GBS is an acute immune-mediated polyneuropathy characterised by progressive, symmetric muscle weakness accompanied by diminished or absent deep tendon reflexes. In 1916, Georges Guillain, Jean-Alexandre Barré and André Strohl described this clinical syndrome in two soldiers with acute motor weakness and areflexia. They noted an increase in CSF protein levels with normal cell count (albuminocytological dissociation).1 GBS is rapidly progressive and typically a monophasic disease (<4 weeks) often preceded by an infection. Two-thirds of adult patients report antecedent illness, most commonly respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infection.2 3 The estimated overall incidence of GBS in the USA is 1.65 to 1.79 per 100 000 population.4 The clinical presentations of GBS4 5 is shown in box 1.
Box 1. Clinical presentations in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
Pain due to inflammation of nerve roots (typically back and leg) can be the presenting symptom of GBS.
Bilateral and symmetric weakness in both upper and lower extremities.
Paresthesias commonly accompany the weakness in more than 80% of patients.
Decreased or absent reflexes are seen in approximately 90% of patients.
Respiratory muscle weakness that may require ventilatory support can develop in 30% of patients.
Facial nerve paralysis can develop in up to half of the patients.
Autonomic dysfunction can be seen in up to 70% of patients. Cardiovascular dysregulation is common and can lead to bradyarrhythmias. SIADH is another complication and is more frequent in hospitalised patients.
The mechanism of GBS is thought to be due to molecular mimicry.6 An antecedent infection produces antibodies that cross-react with specific gangliosides and glycolipids, which are present in the myelin of peripheral nervous system. The end result is demyelination and blockade of conduction along the nerve.
GBS usually progresses over a period of 2 weeks and reaches a nadir in 4 weeks in almost all patients.6 Although rare, recurrence of GBS has been reported in 1%–6% of patients following an asymptomatic period of few months to years (4 months to 10 years).7 8 RGBS is characterised by two or more episodes, with a complete or near-complete recovery between episodes and clinical manifestations lasting ≤4 weeks.9 Immunological host factors or genetics could be implicated in RGBS and patients tend to have similar presentations in the initial as well as RGBS.9
It is important to distinguish RGBS from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and GBS–treatment-related fluctuation (GBS-TRF) as the treatment differs between them (table 3).10 CIDP is characterised by progression or relapse of clinical symptoms beyond 8 weeks from the onset. CIDP also has fewer antecedent events and more sensory signs compared with GBS.11 This is less likely in our patient due to the acute presentation, normal CSF protein and electrodiagnostic evidence of acute demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). GBS-TRF is defined by secondary deterioration after initial improvement within the first weeks or months after onset of disease.10 Our patient was asymptomatic for a year before the recurrence which favours RGBS rather than GBS-TRF.
Table 3.
Differentiating features between GBS, GBS-TRF, A-CIDP and CIDP
| Characteristics | GBS | GBS-TRF | A-CIDP | CIDP |
| Time to reach maximum severity (nadir) | Within 4 weeks | <2 weeks (maximum 4 weeks) |
4–8 weeks, followed by a chronic course | >8 weeks |
| Disease course | Monophasic | One or more deteriorations after initial improvement or stabilisation following plasma exchange or IVIG | >2 deteriorations or deterioration after 8 weeks | Progressive, relapsing–remitting, steadily progressive or monophasic |
| Ventilator dependence | 20%–30% | 20%–30% | Very rare | Very rare |
| Cranial nerve deficits | Common | Common | Less common | Less common |
| Sensory, motor, autonomic involvement | Motor involvement more prominent Autonomic dysfunction more frequent |
Same as GBS | Sensory signs more prominent Rarely autonomic involvement |
Same as A-CIDP |
| Response to IVIG | Good | Good, with fluctuations | Variable | Good |
| EMG/NCS | Sometimes no classification possible at first EMG/NCS | Sometimes no classification possible at first EMG/NCS | Often demyelinating polyneuropathy at first EMG/NCS | Demyelination |
| Treatment | IVIG or plasma exchange | Repeat IVIG or plasma exchange | IVIG or plasma exchange, on confirmed diagnosis of CIDP consider prednisolone maintenance treatment | IVIG, prednisolone or plasma exchange |
Adapted/modified by permission from Springer Nature, Nature Reviews Neurology, Guillain–Barré syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis, Bianca van den Berg, Christa Walgaard, Judith Drenthen, Christiaan Fokke, Bart C. Jacobs et al. 2014 (doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.121).
A-CIDP, acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; CIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; EMG, electromyography; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; GBS-TRF, Guillain-Barré syndrome with treatment-related fluctuation; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; NCS, nerve conduction study.
The diagnosis of GBS is based on clinical presentation and is supported by spinal fluid analysis and electrodiagnostic studies. CSF studies reveal elevated CSF protein with normal cell counts called albuminocytological dissociation. Our patient had normal CSF protein levels even after more than a week of illness during both episodes. On review of literature, one other case was reported with normal CSF findings during both the initial and recurrent GBS in a 25-year-old Sri Lankan woman who presented 12 years after complete recovery of AIDP variant of GBS with acute, ascending symmetrical flaccid quadriparesis extending to bulbar muscles, bilateral VII cranial nerves and respiratory compromise needing mechanical ventilation.12
IVIG or plasmapheresis is the mainstay of treatment in the acute phase of GBS.13 14 The beneficial effects of plasma exchange and IVIG are very similar.15 The combination of both does not confer any more benefit.16 Besides the treatments mentioned above, no pharmacological agents are found to be effective in GBS.17 Glucocorticoids are ineffective18 in the treatment of GBS. In fact, these should not be used as it may slow down recovery.19
The patient was initially treated with pooled immunoglobulin (IVIG) for 4 days which did not hasten the recovery, and because we were worried about complications from immobility, we started her on plasma exchange. She underwent five sessions of plasmapheresis on alternate days which showed significant improvement in her symptoms.
Learning points.
It is important to have a high index of suspicion of recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome in patients who present with bilateral weakness, sensory disturbances and previous history of GBS.
Recurrence of GBS is seen in patients even after months or years of asymptomatic period.
Cerebrospinal fluid findings can be normal during both the initial and recurrent episodes of GBS. Thus, clinical history, thorough examination along with electrodiagnostic studies might be needed to confirm this.
Footnotes
Contributors: AY was responsible for study design, study concept, data collection, drafting and revision of the manuscript with support from EN, PCB and RG. RG and PCB conceived the original idea for this case report. All the people mentioned have contributed to the final version of this manuscript. All the people mentioned have been involved in the patient care.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1. Guillain G, Barré JA, Strohl A. Radiculoneuritis syndrome with hyperalbuminosis of cerebrospinal fluid without cellular reaction. Notes on clinical features and graphs of tendon reflexes. 1916. Ann Med Interne 1999;150:24–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jacobs BC, Rothbarth PH, van der Meché FG, et al. The spectrum of antecedent infections in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a case-control study. Neurology 1998;51:1110–5. 10.1212/WNL.51.4.1110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Winer JB, Hughes RA, Anderson MJ, et al. A prospective study of acute idiopathic neuropathy. II. Antecedent events. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:613–8. 10.1136/jnnp.51.5.613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alshekhlee A, Hussain Z, Sultan B, et al. Guillain-Barré syndrome: incidence and mortality rates in US hospitals. Neurology 2008;70:1608–13. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000310983.38724.d4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fokke C, van den Berg B, Drenthen J, et al. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain 2014;137(Pt 1):33–43. 10.1093/brain/awt285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yuki N, Hartung HP. Guillain-Barré syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2294–304. 10.1056/NEJMra1114525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Das A, Kalita J, Misra UK, et al. Recurrent Guillain Barré syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2004;44:95–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Grand’Maison F, Feasby TE, Hahn AF, et al. Recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome. Clinical and laboratory features. Brain 1992;115:1093–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kuitwaard K, van Koningsveld R, Ruts L, et al. Recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:56–9. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.156463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ruts L, van Koningsveld R, van Doorn PA. Distinguishing acute-onset CIDP from Guillain-Barré syndrome with treatment related fluctuations. Neurology 2005;65:138–40. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000167549.09664.b8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dionne A, Nicolle MW, Hahn AF. Clinical and electrophysiological parameters distinguishing acute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2010;41:202–7. 10.1002/mus.21480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gunatilake SS, Gamlath R, Wimalaratna H. An unusual case of recurrent Guillain-Barré syndrome with normal cerebrospinal fluid protein levels: a case report. BMC Neurol 2016;16:161 10.1186/s12883-016-0687-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hughes RA, Raphael JC, Swan AV, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:Cd002063 10.1002/14651858.CD002063.pub3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Raphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, et al. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;2:Cd001798 10.1002/14651858.Cd001798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. van der Meché FG, Schmitz PI. A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Dutch Guillain-Barré Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1123–9. 10.1056/NEJM199204233261705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Randomised trial of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and combined treatments in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Plasma Exchange/Sandoglobulin Guillain-Barré Syndrome Trial Group. Lancet 1997;349:225–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hughes RA, Pritchard J, Hadden RD. Pharmacological treatment other than corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2:Cd008630 10.1002/14651858.CD001446.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hughes RA. Ineffectiveness of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet 1991;338:1142 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91995-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hughes RA, Swan AV, van Koningsveld R, et al. Corticosteroids for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;2:Cd001446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


