Abstract
Rationale:
Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare condition that affects the skin, bones, and joints. Diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome is established based on clinical manifestations and imaging features on radiography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Patient concerns:
We report a 44-year-old male with a 20-year history of pustulosis who presented with pain in the lower extremities. Plain radiography demonstrated hyperostosis with subperiosteal erosions in the right tibia. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed inflammatory accumulation, whereas musculoskeletal ultrasonography clearly depicted a periosteal reaction, osteitis, and enthesitis with abnormal blood flow in the surface of the right tibia.
Diagnoses:
A diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome was made.
Interventions:
The patient was treated with combination therapy comprising prednisolone, methotrexate, and infliximab, which resulted in clinical improvement.
Outcomes:
The elevated levels of C-reactive protein and matrix metalloproteinase-3 normalized, and the abnormal ultrasonographic findings disappeared.
Lessons:
The present case report demonstrates that multiple imaging modalities are important for the definitive diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome. Ultrasonography might be a useful tool for evaluating local musculoskeletal inflammation in patients with SAPHO syndrome.
Keywords: chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, power Doppler, SAPHO syndrome, ultrasonography
1. Introduction
Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is an intractable inflammatory disease that mainly causes skin rash, sternoclavicular/sacroiliac/peripheral arthritis, and enthesitis.[1] SAPHO syndrome has no serological or other specific biomarkers, and so radiographic imaging techniques such as bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often used to assess disease activity.[2] However, these whole-body images can only roughly reveal localized inflammation, while it is difficult to assess local inflammation in detail. In recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) has become useful for evaluating active synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. US or MRI are the modalities recommended by the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism for the evaluation of inflammatory joints.[3]
SAPHO syndrome is characterized by progressive hyperostosis, synovitis, and osteitis of multiple bones, including those in the lower extremities, as well as skin manifestations.[4] The term “chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO)” is used to describe an auto-inflammatory disorder characterized by painful swelling of bones and joints, and many cases of CRMO in association with skin disorders have been reported.[5] CRMO is now widely considered to represent a subset of SAPHO syndrome.[6] Therefore, CRMO and SAPHO syndrome are now seen as different expressions of the same disease. The diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome remains challenging. The establishment of an early diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome may be aided by the evaluation of bone or articular abnormalities.[7]
In the present case, we used US to detect the periosteal reaction, osteitis, and enthesitis in a patient with SAPHO syndrome. Our study demonstrates that US can detect bone or articular abnormalities (including those associated with CRMO) in patients with SAPHO syndrome and suggests that US evaluation might be useful in the diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome.
2. Case report
A 44-year-old male was admitted to our department because of pain of the lower extremities. He had a 20-year history of pustulosis of the palms, soles, and toes. Three years before admission, he had been diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis because of pretibial edema of both legs; oral aspirin and diuretics had been administered, but the symptoms had not improved.
Physical examination revealed pustulosis on the chest, dermal detachment on the palms and soles, and enormous areas of scleroderma and pigmentation on both legs. The laboratory findings are summarized in Table 1. The white blood cell count was elevated. The red blood cell count and hemoglobin level were slightly low. Coagulation function, liver function, renal function, and electrolytes were normal. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein level were elevated. Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies were normal. Matrix metalloproteinase-3 was elevated. Other autoimmune disease-specific antibodies were within normal ranges.
Table 1.
Laboratory findings on admission.

A radiograph of the lower extremities showed hyperostosis of the tibia (Fig. 1A). Bone scintigraphy showed substantial nuclide accumulation in the bilateral tibias, fibulas, and calcanei (Fig. 1B). Gadolinium-enhanced MRI showed extensive edema of the plantar flexor tendon (Fig. 2A, B), a contrast effect of the calcaneus, and edema of the retrocalcaneal bursa and plantar fascia (Fig. 2C). US assessment of the lower extremities was performed by a Japan College of Rheumatology-certified sonographer (T.A.). Representative US images revealed marked irregularities of the tibial surface (Fig. 3A), thickening of the tendon sheath of the tibialis anterior muscle with edema of the deep subcutaneous fat (Fig. 3B), effusion around the tibialis anterior tendon with synovial thickening of the ankle joint (Fig. 3C), low echoic enthesis of the Achilles tendon with a thickened retrocalcaneal bursa (Fig. 3D), synovial thickening of the metatarsophalangeal joints (Fig. 3E), and thickened plantar fascia (Fig. 3F). Substantially abnormal blood flow signals were seen at each of those sites in power Doppler mode. The patient was finally diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome based on Benhamou diagnostic criteria.[8]
Figure 1.

Radiograph and bone scintigraphy images. (A) Radiograph of the left lower limb showing slight hyperostosis of the tibial surface (arrowheads). (B) Whole-body bone scintigraphy showing substantial nuclide accumulation in the bilateral tibias, fibulas, and calcanei.
Figure 2.

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. There is extensive edema around the plantar flexor tendon (A, B), a contrast effect of the calcaneus, edema around the retrocalcaneal bursa, and plantar fascia (C).
Figure 3.

Musculoskeletal ultrasonographic images of the lower extremities. (A) Marked irregularities of the left tibial surface (arrowheads). (B) Thickened tendon sheath of the right tibialis anterior muscle with edema of the deep subcutaneous fat and a flame-like blood flow signal. (C) Effusion around the right tibialis anterior tendon with a beaded blood flow signal, and synovial thickening of the ankle joint. (D) Low echoic enthesis of the left Achilles tendon with thickened retrocalcaneal bursae, and a spot-like blood flow signal. (E) Synovial thickening of the metatarsophalangeal joints with a spot-like blood flow signal. (F) Thickened plantar fascia.
The patient was treated with oral prednisolone and methotrexate, but this combination therapy did not alleviate his symptoms. Intravenous infliximab therapy (3 mg/kg every 8 weeks) was added to the treatment, which resulted in improvement of the leg pain. After 6 months, the arthritis had resolved, the cutaneous lesions had substantially improved, and the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were within normal ranges. Follow-up US revealed that the tibial irregularity was markedly resolved, and the abnormal blood flow in each part of the lower extremities had completely disappeared (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Follow-up musculoskeletal ultrasonographic images of the lower extremities after 6 months of treatment with oral prednisolone and methotrexate along with intravenous infliximab. (A) Reduced irregularity of the left tibia (arrowheads). (B) Right tibialis anterior muscle. (C) Right ankle joint. (D) Left Achilles tendon. (E) Right second metatarsophalangeal joint. (F) Left plantar fascia.
3. Discussion
SAPHO syndrome is a rare disease that is often under-recognized because of its peculiar and heterogeneous clinical presentation.[4] Osteoarticular manifestations are the hallmark of SAPHO syndrome. The most commonly involved area is the anterior chest wall, followed by the spine (particularly the thoracic bones).[9] The differential diagnoses for the osteoarticular manifestations of SAPHO syndrome include osteomyelitis, primary bone tumors, and granuloma.[10]
SAPHO syndrome is characterized by progressive hyperostosis, synovitis, enthesitis, and multiple bone lesions in various regions, including the lower extremities.[1] In addition to the assessment of skin manifestations, imaging modalities may aid the early diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome.[11] Multimodal imaging techniques such as conventional radiography, MRI, and bone scintigraphy play essential roles in the diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome.[12] In addition, US can detect osteoarticular inflammation with high sensitivity.[13] The present case report demonstrated that US can detect the bone or articular abnormalities in a patient with SAPHO syndrome. Hyperostosis, osteitis, and enthesitis were detected using power Doppler signals on US in the present patient. Therefore, US may be useful for the early diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome.
The osteoarticular manifestations of SAPHO syndrome are hyperostosis and osteitis, which are chronic inflammatory reactions involving the cortical and medullary bone.[14] Chronic bony lesions in patients with SAPHO syndrome are characterized by cortical thickening accompanied by enlargement of trabeculae.[14] CRMO is regarded as a subset of SAPHO syndrome.[6] The typical imaging findings of CRMO include lytic and sclerotic lesions in the metaphyses of long bones.[15] Because of the lack of diagnostic tests, CRMO remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Few reports have described the US findings in SAPHO syndrome, including CRMO.[16] Ikeda et al[17] reported a single US image report of a patient with SAPHO syndrome with severe synovial hypertrophy accompanied by markedly increased power Doppler signals in the sternoclavicular joint. Queiro et al[18] reported that US examination is useful for evaluating enthesitis in patients with SAPHO syndrome. The objective of the present case report was to describe the characteristic US findings of SAPHO syndrome, including CRMO. Although the anterior chest wall and sternoclavicular joints are the main regions predominately affected in patients with SAPHO syndrome,[19] the involvement of these regions is not pathognomonic. SAPHO syndrome also affects long bones, and bony involvement is highly distinctive as the mainstay of the diagnosis.[20] We consider that an US approach would increase the sensitivity for detecting hyperostosis and osteitis, despite the fact that these manifestations are predominantly found in the lower extremities, as seen in our patient with SAPHO syndrome.
Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors show efficacy for bone, joint, and skin manifestations, and have been used in the management of SAPHO syndrome.[21] Consistent with previously reported cases, infliximab administration in our patient with SAPHO syndrome was effective in alleviating the bone and joint manifestations. The rationale for the use of a TNF-α inhibitor is that TNF-α is a potent regulator of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-8, some of which are dysregulated in SAPHO syndrome.[22] Immunosuppressive drugs such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and cyclophosphamide are frequently administered in the treatment of SAPHO syndrome.[23] However, these treatments have shown only partial efficacy. Biologics, including TNF-α blockers, lead to sustained improvement of osteoarticular involvement of SAPHO syndrome.[24]
The present study has some limitations. It is a single case report, and there is no criterion for imaging diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome using US. We need to determine whether our US imaging report of SAPHO syndrome applies to other cases by increasing the number of US examinations performed in patients with SAPHO syndrome.
In conclusion, osteoarticular manifestations of SAPHO syndrome are characterized by hyperostosis and osteitis, which are chronic inflammatory reactions involving the long bones, including the tibial bone. The lesions are associated with sclerotic changes and are accompanied by periosteal reaction. US is an accurate and quick tool with which to assess the subperiosteal spread of osteitis and the periosteal reaction with a vascularized rim using the increased power Doppler signal. Therefore, US might be a very useful and versatile imaging modality that enables the early diagnosis of SAPHO syndrome. Further studies are needed to determine whether the US findings of hyperostosis or osteitis are common features in patients with SAPHO syndrome.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kelly Zammit, BVSc, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Tomoyuki Asano, Kiyoshi Migita.
Data curation: Tomoyuki Asano, Makiko Yashiro Furuya.
Formal analysis: Tomoyuki Asano, Makiko Yashiro Furuya, Kiyoshi Migita.
Investigation: Tomoyuki Asano, Makiko Yashiro Furuya, Naoki Matsuoka, Shuzo Sato, Aki Honda.
Methodology: Tomoyuki Asano, Makiko Yashiro Furuya, Yuya Fujita, Shuzo Sato, Aki Honda.
Project administration: Tomoyuki Asano.
Resources: Aki Honda.
Supervision: Hiroko Kobayashi, Hiroshi Watanabe, Kiyoshi Migita.
Validation: Shuzo Sato, Hiroko Kobayashi, Hiroshi Watanabe, Kiyoshi Migita.
Visualization: Tomoyuki Asano, Kiyoshi Migita.
Writing – original draft: Tomoyuki Asano, Kiyoshi Migita.
Writing – review & editing: Tomoyuki Asano, Kiyoshi Migita.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CRMO = chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis, CT = computed tomography, IL = interleukin, MMP-3 = matrix metalloproteinase-3, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, SAPHO = synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis, TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-α, US = ultrasonography.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committees Fukushima Medical University (approval no. 2835).
The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of this case report.
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
References
- [1].Nguyen MT, Borchers A, Selmi C, et al. The SAPHO syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2012;42:254–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Schaub S, Sirkis HM, Kay J. Imaging for Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, and Osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2016;42:695–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Moller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1974–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Cianci F, Zoli A, Gremese E, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of SAPHO syndrome: challenging diagnose and treatment. Clin Rheumatol 2017;36:2151–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Wipff J, Adamsbaum C, Kahan A, et al. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Joint Bone Spine 2011;78:555–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Greenwood S, Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino VN. SAPHO and recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Radiol Clin North Am 2017;55:1035–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Colina M, Govoni M, Orzincolo C, et al. Clinical and radiologic evolution of synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis syndrome: a single center study of a cohort of 71 subjects. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:813–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Benhamou CL, Chamot AM, Kahn MF. Synovitis-acne-pustulosis hyperostosis-osteomyelitis syndrome (SAPHO). A new syndrome among the spondyloarthropathies? Clin Exp Rheumatol 1988;6:109–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Earwaker JW, Cotten A. SAPHO: syndrome or concept? Imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32:311–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Berenguer Frances MA, Lafaurie Acevedo A, Tormo Ferrero V, et al. SAPHO syndrome in the differential diagnosis of metastasis. Reumatol Clin 2016;12:288–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Orui H, Takahara M, Ishikawa A, et al. Radiological features of long bones in synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis syndrome and their correlation with pathological findings. Mod Rheumatol 2002;12:56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Duan N, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. Multimodal imaging findings of SAPHO syndrome with no skin lesions: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Exp Ther Med 2016;12:2665–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Iagnocco A, Ceccarelli F, Perricone C, et al. The role of ultrasound in rheumatology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2011;32:66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Suei Y, Taguchi A, Tanimoto K. Diagnostic points and possible origin of osteomyelitis in synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome: a radiographic study of 77 mandibular osteomyelitis cases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:1398–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Khanna G, Sato TS, Ferguson P. Imaging of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Radiographics 2009;29:1159–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Umeda M, Kawashiri SY, Nishino A, et al. Synovitis of sternoclavicular and peripheral joints can be detected by ultrasound in patients with SAPHO syndrome. Mod Rheumatol 2017;27:881–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ikeda K, Yamagata M, Tanaka S, et al. Synovitis and osteitis in the left sternoclavicular joint in a 60-year-old woman. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2015;42:133–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Queiro R, Alonso S, Alperi M, et al. Entheseal ultrasound abnormalities in patients with SAPHO syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:913–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Guglielmi G, Cascavilla A, Scalzo G, et al. Imaging of sternocostoclavicular joint in spondyloarthropaties and other rheumatic conditions. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009;27:402–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Okuno H, Watanuki M, Kuwahara Y, et al. Clinical features and radiological findings of 67 patients with SAPHO syndrome. Mod Rheumatol 2018;28:703–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Ben Abdelghani K, Dran DG, Gottenberg JE, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers in SAPHO syndrome. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1699–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Hurtado-Nedelec M, Chollet-Martin S, Nicaise-Roland P, et al. Characterization of the immune response in the synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1160–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Witt M, Meier J, Hammitzsch A, et al. Disease burden, disease manifestations and current treatment regimen of the SAPHO syndrome in Germany: results from a nationwide patient survey. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;43:745–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Firinu D, Murgia G, Lorrai MM, et al. Biological treatments for SAPHO syndrome: an update. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2014;13:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
