Abstract
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) play a critical role in host defense against infection and in the resolution of inflammation. However immune responses mediated by PMN must be tightly regulated to facilitate elimination of invading pathogens without inducing detrimental inflammation and host tissue damage. Specific engagement of cell surface immunoreceptors by a diverse range of extracellular signals regulates PMN effector functions through differential activation of intracellular signaling cascades. While mechanisms of PMN activation mediated via cell signaling pathways have been well described less is known about negative regulation of PMN function by immune signaling cascades. Here we provide an overview of immunoreceptor mediated negative regulation of key PMN effector functions including maturation, migration, phagocytosis, ROS release, degranulation, apoptosis and NETosis. Increased understanding of mechanisms of suppression of PMN effector functions may point to possible future therapeutic targets for the amelioration of PMN-mediated autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
Keywords: neutrophils, ITIM, inflammation
Summary statement:
Review on how PMN functions are negatively regulated by immune signaling pathways.
Introduction
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) are the predominant leukocytes in human blood and as such they are key effectors of the innate immune response. The highly motile nature of PMN paired with their ability to identify and rapidly respond to chemoattractant signals makes them critical first responders at sites of infection/inflammation. Following migration into inflamed tissues PMN execute a number of effector functions that facilitate pathogen clearance and resolution of inflammation including phagocytosis, generation of reactive oxygen metabolites, as well as release of microbiocidal granule contents and extracellular traps. However, the considerable array of microbiocidal and pro-inflammatory mediators contained within PMN granules means that excessive PMN accumulation and activation within inflamed tissues can be detrimental to the host [1, 2]. As such, PMN mediated mucosal tissue damage is a pathological consequence of a number of inflammatory disorders including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), chronic peritonitis, sepsis and renal injury [3].
Given the destructive potential of PMN in tissues, maturation, recruitment and inflammatory effector functions of PMN must be tightly regulated processes subjected to both positive and negative regulators. Such control is achieved in part through engagement of PMN cell surface receptors that trigger very diverse signal transduction pathways. PMN express several classes of cell surface receptors including G-protein-coupled-seven-transmembrane receptors (GPCR), integrins, selectins, Fc receptors, cytokine receptors and innate immune receptors including C-type lectins and toll like receptors [4]. While engagement of cell surface receptors activates a range of PMN immune functions, it is also well accepted that PMN express various inhibitory receptors that negatively regulate critical effector functions. This suppression of PMN activation serves to facilitate host protection from pathogens while avoiding bystander tissue damage and, as such is of critical importance for a successful immune response. Therefore, this mini-review highlights the regulation of PMN behavior through negative regulation of immune signaling pathways.
Negative Regulation of PMN granulopoiesis
The production and maturation of PMN (granulopoiesis) occurs in the bone marrow (BM) through sequential differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells to myeloblast, promyelocytes, myelocytes, metamyelocytes, band cells, and finally mature PMN. At the end of this process PMN leave the BM and begin circulating in the vasculature [5]. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the major cytokine that induces granulopoiesis. However, G-CSF binding to its receptor G-CSFR also recruits several cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases, including members of the Src family kinases that function to negatively regulate PMN release from the BM. As such, triple knockout (KO) mice lacking Hck, Lyn, and Fgr, the major Src kinases expressed in myeloid cells, have an increased proliferative response to G-CSF and more circulating PMN as compared to wild-type mice [6]. The analysis of individual roles for Hck and Lyn revealed that Hck negatively regulates G-CSF-induced proliferation of granulocytic precursors, whereas Lyn negatively regulates the production of myeloid progenitors [6].
It has also been described that the suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS3) inhibits G-CSFR signaling by a classical negative feedback loop mechanism. Activation of G-CSFR results in recruitment of SOCS3 which binds directly to tyrosine Y729 on G-CSFR inhibiting JAK/STAT3 activation and thus regulating G-CSF mediated PMN proliferation [7]. In addition to inhibiting G-CSFR signaling, SOCS3 also inhibits IL-6 signaling by binding the signal transducing receptor subunit gp130, a receptor that is closely related to G-CSFR [7]. Boyle et al. showed that mice expressing a truncated SOCS3 protein (lacking the C-terminal SOCS box) had an increased number of colony-forming cells upon exposure to G-CSF and IL-6. In an in vivo model of arthritis, truncation of SOCS3 leads to a more florid arthritis when compared with WT mice, suggesting that dysregulated PMN proliferation in the BM is associated with the development of autoimmune disorders [8].
During PMN differentiation, progenitor cells committed to hematopoietic lineages interact and migrate along and then across BM while receiving stimulatory and inhibitory signals from stromal marrow cells. It is known that constitutive expression of stromal-derived factor (SDF-1/CXCL12) and its G protein-coupled chemokine receptor (CXCR4) are required for hematopoietic cell adhesion, and PMN retention in the BM [9]. In contrast, release of PMN occurs through CXCL2 (MIP-2) interaction with its receptor CXCR2, or through G-CSFR or Toll-like receptors, all of which appear late during PMN maturation in the BM [10]. Consequently, mature PMN up-regulate expression of CXCR2 and decrease CXCR4 expression, a balance that favors release of BM PMN into the circulation [11]. CXCR2, is a chemokine receptor that has been shown to favor PMN release and as such, Cxcr2−/− PMN fail to exit the BM, reproducing a myelokathexis phenotype. G-CSF decreases CXCL12 expression in the BM, decreases PMN CXCR4 expression and, induces BM expression of the CXCR2 ligand CXCL2, ultimately promoting PMN release into the circulation [12]. CXCR4 on the other hand, opposes the role of CXCR2. Therefore mutations causing increased activation of CXCR4 result in increased PMN retention in the BM as seen in the human syndrome WHIM (warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathexis) [13]. Conversely, the deletion of CXCR4 in myeloid cells promotes a substantial neutrophilia [14]. Therefore, CXCL2-CXCR2 signaling represents a chemokine axis that controls PMN migration out of the BM by opposing CXCL12-CXCR4 signals [11]. PMN release may be also be mediated by signals through G-CSFR, fMLF receptors or Toll-like receptors, but in the absence of CXCR4, the stimulation of these receptors does not cause additional PMN release from the BM, demonstrating the essential role of CXCR4 signaling for PMN retention in the BM [14].
The adhesion and retention of PMN precursors within the BM depends on β1 and β2 integrins interacting with their receptors expressed on stromal marrow cells. However, the exact mechanisms by which attenuated CXCR4 signaling leads to migration of PMN from the BM are not yet completely understood. The Src family kinases Lyn, Fgr, and Hck have been shown to play an essential role in integrin function and signaling in PMN. Of particular interest, Lyn has been shown to act as a negative regulator of PMN functions and it is an important part of the regulatory network that links chemotactic signals to adhesive responses of hematopoietic cells [15]. Nakata et al. showed that Lyn negatively regulates CXCL12-CXCR4 mediated PMN adhesion to BM [16]. Activation of Lyn by CXCL12-CXCR4 inhibits activation of the β2 integrin LFA-1, reducing adhesion to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and allowing PMN to move more freely within the marrow, where they continue their maturation before being released into the circulation [16]. In vitro assays showed that PMN deficient in Lyn express normal levels of integrins (including LFA-1), but demonstrate increased attachment to BM stromal cells and decreased migration in response to CXCL12. Most probably this transient Lyn mediated inhibition of CXCR4-β2 integrin activation occurs via inside-out signaling through as yet unidentified pathways. This negative regulation is not solely activated by the CXCR4 receptor as fMLF-induced PMN chemotaxis also requires Lyn to inhibit β2 integrin-dependent cell adhesion to ICAM-1 [16].
GPCRs involved in PMN proliferation and maturation in the BM are regulated by the activity of downstream kinases. As such, members of the GPCR kinase (GRK) and arrestin families induce GPCR desensitization upon agonist stimulation leading to a feedback mechanism that rapidly uncouples the receptor from its associated G protein. There are seven GRKs known, with GRK2, −3, −5, and −6 being the four most widely expressed members. Studies from Grk6-deficient mice suggest GRK6 inhibits CXCL12-induced chemotaxis of PMN [17, 18]. Balabanian et al. also described a pivotal role for GRK3 in CXCR4 mediated signaling through internalization and desensitization of CXCR4 in fibroblasts and T cells. CD4+ T cells from WHIM syndrome patients displayed a stronger chemotaxis in response to CXCL12 [19]. However, the role of GRK3 and GRK6 in regulating PMN mobilization from BM into blood in response to CXCL12-CXCR4 has not been fully characterized.
In addition to negative regulation of PMN maturation by protein kinases, granulopoiesis is also suppressed by protein phosphatases. Wild-Type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1, also known as PP2Cd) is an oncogene that inhibits several p53-dependent tumor suppressor pathways. Expression of Wip1 increases during PMN maturation and, Wip1 deficient mice display increased granulocytic differentiation, proliferation, and BM maturation leading to a severe neutrophilia, suggesting that Wip1 is a negative regulator of both granulopoiesis and PMN homeostasis [20]. Further, in response to G-CSF, BM PMN deficient in Wip1 displayed rapid and increased phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and STAT1 suggesting that Wip1 inhibits p38 MAPK/STAT1 mediated PMN maturation [20]. Another possible explanation for the neutrophilia observed in Wip1−/− mice is that Wip1 deficient PMN express higher levels of CXCR2 and lower levels of CXCR4 than wild type mice, thus favoring the release of PMN into the circulation [11].
Signaling events that inhibit PMN trafficking to sites of infection/inflammation
PMN migration to inflamed mucosal tissues requires sequential migration across endothelial [21] and epithelial [1] barriers and is facilitated through a complicated series of protein-protein binding interactions. Trafficking of mature circulating PMN to sites of infection or inflammation is essential for effective defense against invading pathogens and for successful resolution of inflammation. However, given that PMN carry an arsenal of toxic metabolites that can cause damage to host tissues, all steps of the PMN trafficking cascade are highly regulated. While protein kinases such as Syk and Src family members mediate PMN activation through immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) signaling domains, Src family members also activate immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitor motif (ITIM) domains to negatively regulate PMN signal transduction pathways. ITIM phosphorylation by Src family kinases (Hck, Fgr and Lyn) recruits SH2 domain-containing phosphatase (SHP) 1 and 2 as well as SH2 domain-containing inositol phosphatase (SHIP) 1 and 2 that dephosphorylate substrates of ITAM mediated activating signaling pathways in order to down-regulate PMN functional responses. Therefore, several ITIM containing immunoreceptors have been shown to play key roles in negative regulation of PMN trafficking (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of ITIM mediated inhibition of PMN trafficking.
Phosphorylation of intracellular ITIM domains by Src kinases leads to recruitment of SHP1/2 and SHIP1/2 followed by subsequent inhibition of Syk kinase-mediated PI3K activation, CD18/CD11b signaling, actin polymerization, ERK1/2 activation, Rap activation and Ca2+ mobilization, decreased generation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and decreased Akt activation leading to reduced PMN activation and reduced PMN trafficking [16, 26–29, 33–35, 42].
SIRP receptors
Phagocytes, including PMN, express the ITIM containing protein signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) the counter ligand for the widely expressed membrane receptor CD47. SIRPα also binds soluble surfactant A and D, innate immune system collectins (collagen-containing C-type lectins). While mAbs to SIRPα and soluble CD47 have been shown to decrease PMN transepithelial migration [22], more recently it has been demonstrated that SIRPα mutant mice (which express the extracellular domain of SIRPα but not the cytoplasmic ITIM signaling domain) have increased PMN migration in a uric-acid induced peritonitis model of sterile inflammation [23].
Siglec receptors
Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectins (Siglecs) are another family of ITIM containing immune receptors expressed by human and murine PMN. In human PMN, engagement of Siglec 5 and Siglec 9 by sialylated ligands induces ITIM phosphorylation, recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2 phosphatases and down-regulation of PMN activator signaling pathways [24]. As such, PMNs deficient in Siglec E (the murine paralog of Siglec 9) show accelerated recruitment to the lung upon intranasal administration of LPS. This increase in PMN trafficking is mediated by inhibition of CD11b outside-in signaling downstream of engagement of Siglec E by sialylated fibrinogen [25].
PIR receptors
The paired immunoglobulin receptor (PIR-B) is another ITIM containing immunoreceptor that functions as a negative regulator of integrin-mediated migration in PMN. Src family kinases Hck and Fgr phosphorylate tyrosine residues of the PIR-B ITIM domain thereby activating it and suppressing PMN activation. As such, treatment of PMN deficient in PIR-B with cytokines (MIP-1α/CCL3, and MIP-2/CXCL2) results in enhanced intracellular calcium mobilization, increased ERK1/2 activation, increased actin polymerization and enhanced migratory capacities [26, 27]. Another PMN inhibitory receptor, PILRα (paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α), contains two ITIM domains that recruit SHP-1 and SHP-2. PILRα binds in cis to PMN expressed sialyloglycoproteins to negatively regulate chemoattractant-triggered activation of PMN by β2 integrins [28]. Increased activation of Rap1 following fMLF stimulation of Pilrα−/− PMN compared to wild type PMN has also been reported, suggesting that PILRα down-regulates GPCR mediated integrin activation. As such, Pilrα−/− mice have increased PMN recruitment in vivo in a thioglycolate-induced sterile peritonitis model [28].
Src Family Tyrosine Kinases and Phosphatases signal downstream of ITIM domains
In addition to inhibitory signaling mechanisms orchestrated through phosphorylation of ITIM domains, protein phosphatases also counterbalance PMN signaling activation and play a central role in inhibiting PMN migration. Tyrosine phosphorylation is one of the earliest consequences of PMN cell surface receptor activation [29]. The Src family tyrosine kinases have been implicated in a number of GPCR signaling pathways that propagate downstream signals in a positive fashion resulting in activation of PMN processes including migration, phagocytosis and degranulation [30, 31]. However, the role of Src kinases in PMN activation is somewhat controversial in that it has also been reported that Src kinases can also act as negative regulators of PMN function. PMN from double knockout Hck/Fgr mice displayed significantly higher peak Ca2+ flux following stimulation with chemokines including CCL3, CXCL1 and CXCL2 and IL-8 [27]. In addition, double mutant Hck−/−Fgr−/− PMN demonstrated increased ERK1/2 activation, increased F-actin polymerization and increased chemotaxis in vitro to CCL3 and CXCL2. Similar to results observed in vitro, increased PMN trafficking of Hck−/−Fgr−/− PMN was observed in vivo using a thioglycolate induced model of sterile peritonitis, suggesting that Hck and Fgr signal through ERK1/2 to dampen PMN migratory responses to agonists of both CXCR2 and CCR1 [27]. In support of this negative regulation of PMN trafficking by Src kinases, other studies have shown that Lyn negatively regulates integrin mediated PMN adhesion through ITIM domain phosphorylation of inhibitory immunoreceptors (SIRP1α and PIR-B) and subsequent recruitment of SHP-1. Therefore, reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of both SIRP1α and PIR-B following engagement of β2 integrins in Lyn−/− PMN results in reduced recruitment of SHP-1 and a hyper-adhesive/hyper-responsive phenotype [15]. In keeping with this, it has also been reported that PMN and macrophages from mice with a point mutation in Shp-1, that reduces expression of SHP-1 by 90%, display a hyper-adhesive phenotype [15, 32]. Abram et al. demonstrated that selective deletion of SHP-1 in murine PMN resulted in a hyper-activated PMN phenotype characterized by increased activation of ERK1/2, Src-Family kinases and Syk as well as spontaneous PMN mediated cutaneous paw inflammation [33]. As in mice, increased PMN trafficking to the skin resulting in neutrophilic dermatoses is also seen in humans with a spontaneous mutation in the Ptpn6 gene [34]. Thus, deficiency of PTPN6/SHP-1 or impaired recruitment of SHP-1 to ITIM containing immunoreceptors in Lyn−/− PMN results in hyper-responsiveness, increased integrin ligation and increased PMN migration.
The protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a ubiquitously expressed phosphatase that is activated upon exposure to pro-inflammatory mediators including TNFα. Activated PTP1B can in turn act as a common negative regulator of NFκB, Akt and MAPK activities. In keeping with its role as a negative regulator of immune cell function Ptp1b KO mice exhibited higher accumulation of PMN (as measured by myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels and severity of edema) in the ear in response to LPS or Zymosan [35] and in the lungs in response to P. aeruginosa [36]. Similarly, in a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) model of lung inflammation, loss of PTP1B expression resulted in changes in cytokine signaling, elevated PMN accumulation and increased damage and disruption of the epithelial cell barrier [37].
Immune signaling through small GTPases regulates PMN trafficking
PMN trafficking is facilitated by rapid chemokine-induced generation of cellular phosphoinositol phosphate gradients. Agonist-activated phosphoinositide-3 kinases (PI3Ks) trigger activation of lipid second messengers PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(3,4)P2. These lipids recruit and activate PI3K effectors including guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) and Rho family small GTPases. Rho family small GTPases expressed by PMN include Rac proteins (Rac1, Rac2 and RhoG), RhoA and Cdc42. Certain small GTPases are known to negatively regulate PMN migratory responses. In general, the activation of Rho GTPases is positively regulated by GEFs and negatively regulated by GAPs. Thus, RhoA is reported to act as a rheostat suppressing premature PMN activation. In keeping with this, depletion of RhoA in PMN leads to increased PMN chemotaxis towards β2 integrin independent stimuli including CXCL1 [38]. Increased trafficking of RhoA/B deficient PMN was also observed in vivo following sterile inflammation induced by thioglycolate [38]. ARHGAP25 is a Rac-specific GAP expressed by PMN, and similar to what was found for RhoA, it has been reported that loss of ARHGAP25 expression leads to a pro-inflammatory phenotype with increased PMN Rac activation and elevated transmigration into inflamed tissues [39]. Bcr and Abr are GAPs that contain binding sites for a number of signal transduction proteins including tyrosine kinases, serine/threonine kinases and scaffolding proteins. Interestingly, increased PMN accumulation in the lungs of double mutant Abr−/− Bcr−/− mice following LPS injection has been reported [40], suggesting that Bcr and Abr are PMN cell signaling mediators that down regulate PMN trafficking responses.
Signaling through second messengers and GPCRs regulates PMN trafficking
PI3K mediated generation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and Rac activation at the leading edge of migrating PMN is counter-balanced by the activity of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 phosphatases, SH2 domain containing inositol phosphatase 1 (SHIP-1) and phosphatase tensin homologue (PTEN) which, convert PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 to PtdIns(3,4)P2 at the back of migrating cells. In keeping with its role as a negative regulator of PMN activation, Subramanian et al. demonstrated that in response to chemoattractants (including IL-8, C5a and fMLF), PTEN deficient PMN demonstrated enhanced Akt activation, prolonged F-Actin activation, increased membrane ruffling and increased chemotaxis across transwell support filters [41]. In addition, loss of PTEN led to an increase in PMN recruitment to the peritoneum in response to inflammatory stimulants including thioglycolate and E. coli. Further in vivo studies used intravital microscopy to show that disruption of PTEN on PMN increased PMN rolling velocity and PI3K dependent PMN recruitment to the cremaster muscle in response to various stimuli including fMLF, TNF- α and CXCL2. Increased PMN emigration efficiency to the cremaster muscle in the more physiologically relevant setting of ischemia/reperfusion injury was also observed in myeloid specific PTEN KO mice compared to WT mice [42]. Enhancement of PTEN null PMN trafficking was also observed in a mouse model where lung inflammation was induced by intra-tracheal instillation of E. coli (one of the most common pathogens in neutropenia related pneumonia). Further, specific increases in PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and Akt phosphorylation as well as increased PMN trafficking to the lungs were also reported in PTEN deficient PMN compared to WT PMN in a neutropenia-associated pneumonia model [43].
Another second messenger-mediated binding interaction that down-regulates PMN trafficking is binding of adenosine to its GPCR (Adenosine Receptor A(2A)AR). Adenosine is an an extracellular messenger that plays a protective role in acute inflammation and promotes wound healing through down-regulation of PMN activity [44]. Activation of A(2A)AR causes a reduction in PMN motility and as such depletion of A(2A)AR in vivo leads to increased PMN trafficking to the airways and increased lung inflammation in response to aerosolized ragweed allergen [45].
Binding of the glucocorticoid-regulated protein Annexin A1 (Anxa1) to its GPCR (formyl peptide receptor type 2/lipoxin A4 receptor, FPR2/ALX) has also been identified as a mechanism for limiting the scope of an inflammatory response. As such, administration of Anxa1 to mice results in potent inhibition of PMN egress from the microcirculation [46]. Corroborating evidence of the inhibitory role of Anxa1 was provided by in vitro studies demonstrating inhibition of PMN transmigration across endothelial cells upon treatment with Anax1. Consistent with these data, PMN from Anxa1 deficient mice have increased CD11b/CD18 surface expression and increased chemotactic responses compared to WT PMN [47]. Binding of the anti-inflammatory ligand lipoxin A4 to FPR2/ALX also inhibits PMN chemotaxis, adhesion and transmigration across vascular endothelium [48]. Further evidence for FPR2/ALX acting as an anti-inflammatory GPCR was provided using mice lacking FPR2/ALX. These mice had increased inflammation associated with a marked increase in PMN adherence and emigration in the mesenteric microcirculation following ischemia reperfusion injury and as well as an increased acute response to carrageenan-induced paw edema compared to WT FPR2/ALX expressing PMN [49]. Given the number of studies demonstrating that PMN FRP2/ALX can be targeted to negatively regulate PMN trafficking and PMN inflammatory function, signaling through this GPCR is an area that is currently being investigated for anti-inflammatory therapeutics [50].
Immune signaling by JAK-STAT regulates PMN trafficking
Cytokine stimulation of immune cells activates the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway mediating a range of biological processes including PMN trafficking. JAK-STAT pathways are therefore regulated at many steps through distinct mechanisms including tyrosine phosphatases, protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS) and SOCS. Negative regulation of PMN trafficking by members of the SOCS family has been previously described. Mice with myeloid specific deletion of SOCS3 have elevated STAT 3 activation and more extensive PMN infiltration into the cerebellum and brainstem compared to WT mice in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model [51]. Similarly, using an in vivo model of inflammatory arthritis Wong et al. demonstrated that deletion of SOCS3 from PMN results in more pronounced joint inflammation characterized by increased numbers of PMN in the inflamed synovium [52].
Cytokine-mediated suppression of PMN trafficking
Negative regulation of PMN trafficking is also mediated directly by cytokine triggered immune signaling. In response to Staphylococcus aureus, human PMN engage IL-20 resulting in modification of actin polymerization and inhibition of a broad range of actin dependent functions. Using an in vitro model of PMN migration, Gough et al. recently demonstrated that IL-20 actively inhibits PMN transmigration across bronchoepithelial cells in an ERK1/2 dependent fashion [53]. A similar IL-20 mediated inhibition of PMN trafficking has been reported in vivo in a mouse model of corneal healing [54].
Immune signaling mediated regulation of PMN Phagocytosis
Following trafficking to a site of infection, PMN are the first immune cells to encounter and subsequently engulf invading pathogens. As such phagocytosis is central to the microbiocidal function of PMN and, as with other PMN effector functions including maturation and migration, the process of PMN phagocytosis is also highly regulated by a variety of intracellular signaling cascades. PMN phagocytosis requires reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, a process that depends on small GTPases, particularly Rac [55]. There are many studies from transgenic mice, and human PMN demonstrating that most, if not all, PMN functions including phagocytosis are subject to regulation by Rho family small GTPases. To date, two PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 activated Rac GAPs, ARHGAP15 and ARHGAP25, have been shown to drive Rac-inactivation in myeloid cells. It has also been demonstrated that ARHGAP15-deficient PMN display increased Rac-dependent F-actin reorganization as well as increased phagocytosis and pathogen killing [56]. As such, overexpression of ARHGAP25 in an FcγRIIa-expressing cell line (COSphoxFcγR) significantly decreased phagocytosis of serum-opsonized yeast particles. In a promyelocytic cell line (PLB-985) differentiated to a PMN-like phenotype, silencing ARHGAP25 significantly enhanced complement-mediated phagocytosis of opsonized yeast particles. ARHGAP25-mediated increases in phagocytosis were also reported in primary macrophages [57]. These phenotypes suggest a potential role for both of these Rac GAPs in down regulating PMN phagocytosis in order to promote pathogen clearance while minimizing PMN-inflicted tissue damage (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Different effectors negatively regulate PMN functions.
GTPase-activating proteins (GAPS), have been shown to suppress PMN functions such as phagocytosis, ROS production, and degranulation by inhibiting the activation of Rac and F-actin polymerization [39, 40, 56, 57, 61]. Vav-1 and TIPE-2 also inhibits Rac activation and therefore, suppress ROS production [59, 60]. Phosphatases such as PTP1B and PTEN negatively regulates phagocytosis [36]. PTEN also regulates ROS production by regulating the availability of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 [41]. Since it is well described NET formation depends of ROS production it is possible that negative regulators of ROS production are also potentially inhibiting NETosis. C-terminal kinase inhibits degranulation by phosphorylating the C-terminal inhibitory tyrosine residues of Src kinases [69]. PMN apoptosis can be delayed by active Akt promoting the inactivation of caspase-9 and therefore the inactivation of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bax. In addition, Akt has been described to inactivate GSK3β, preventing the degradation of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 member Mcl-1 [72].
In addition to F-actin mediated regulation of phagocytosis, suppression of phagocytosis downstream of phosphatase activity has also been reported. PTEN is a phosphatase that negatively regulates PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 therefore acting as a negative regulator of several PMN effector functions including phagocytosis. Li and colleagues reported that PTEN null PMN showed enhanced bacteria killing in a pneumonia model due to increased phagocytic capacity [43]. Another phosphatase, the ubiquitous tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B has been shown to negatively regulate PMN function. In a P. aeruginosa infection model, Ptp1b−/− mice displayed enhanced bacterial clearance accompanied by increased PMN infiltration in the lungs, suggesting increased phagocytosis in the absence of PTP1B [36]. However, further analysis dissecting the individual roles of PMN and macrophages in bacterial clearance is necessary in order to conclude PTP1B negatively regulates PMN phagocytosis.
Release of anti-inflammatory cytokines during later stages of an immune response also serves to dampen PMN activation and prevent detrimental damage to host tissues. Recently Gough et al. found that IL-20 inhibits PMN phagocytosis, degranulation and migration by modifying actin polymerization in an S. aureus model of infection [53]. IL-20 signals through two different receptor complexes made up of heterodimers of the common IL-20RB subunit and either IL-20RA (complex type I) or IL-22RA (type II). While PMN from peripheral blood of healthy donors expressed only IL-22RA, exposure to S. aureus resulted in increased expression of IL-20RB in IL-8 or TNFα primed PMN in vivo and in vitro. Following S. aureus infection, treatment with IL-20 reduced intracellular bacterial killing in primed PMN, by impairing phagocytosis [53]. IL-20 induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 but not p38 MAPK, and inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling restored the phagocytic ability of TNFα primed PMN suggesting that IL-20 inhibits PMN phagocytosis in an ERK1/2 dependent fashion.
Small GTPase mediated regulation of PMN ROS production
Following migration into inflamed tissues and phagocytosis, PMN destroy engulfed pathogens in part through the generation of an oxidative burst (reviewed in full elsewhere [58]) However, given its destructive potential, ROS production by PMN is tightly regulated. PMN ROS production requires complex cytoskeleton rearrangement facilitated by small GTPases of the Rho family (Rac, Rho and Cdc42). As such Rho family GTPases are important negative regulators of the PMN oxidative burst. Adherence of PMN to a variety of extracellular matrix proteins results in a delay in the formation of ROS. This suppression of the oxidative burst represents a protective mechanism to prevent tissue damage by PMN as they move through tissues to reach sites of inflammation. This adhesion mediated regulation of NADPH oxidase is in part mediated by the small GTPase Rac2. It has been reported that activated PMN integrins suppress Rac2 activation and assembly of a functional NADPH oxidase complex. This inhibitory effect is also associated with tyrosine phosphatase mediated decreases in Y174 phosphorylation of the membrane associated Rho/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), Vav-1 [59]. These data therefore suggest that Vav1 is an important link between G protein-coupled chemoattractant receptors and Rac2 mediated activation of NADPH oxidase.
The TNFα induced protein 8 family member TIPE2 also regulates the PMN oxidative burst by binding to and blocking Rac GTPases. As a result of this inhibitory interaction, compared to WT PMN, Tipe2−/− PMN exhibited enhanced intracellular and extracellular ROS production in response to stimulation with fMLF or Listeria monocytogenes [60]. Bcr is another Rac1/Rac2 GAP implicated in signaling events that down-regulate PMN ROS production and it has been reported that PMN from Bcr−/− mice have increased Rac mediated reactive oxygen metabolite production in response to fMLF [61]. Arap3 is a PI3K regulated RhoA GAP that also signals to down-regulate PMN activation. In keeping with this, an increase in β2 integrin/adhesion dependent ROS generation in PMN deficient in Arap3 has been reported [62].Finally, enhanced ROS generation associated with augmented translocation of the gp91phox-p22phox complex, the phagocyte oxidase component p47phox and the atypical protein kinase Cζ to the plasma membrane has been reported in RhoA/B deficient PMN, further demonstrating the suppressive role of small GTPases on generation of the PMN superoxide burst [38] (Fig. 2).
ITIM containing immunoreceptors regulate PMN ROS generation
Similar to other important PMN effector functions (discussed above), PMN ROS production is also subject to negative regulation by ITIM-domain containing immunoreceptors. The ITIM domain containing inhibitory receptor CD300a is up-regulated by inflammatory stimuli on human PMN and reduces Fc receptor (CD32a) mediated ROS production by inhibiting Ca2+ flux [63]. Clec12 is another ITIM-containing C type lectin receptor expressed by PMN that recruits SHP-1 and SHP-2 to negatively regulate Syk signaling. Clec12 is also a negative regulator of PMN ROS production and it has been demonstrated that monosodium urate crystals (MSU)-induced p40phox phosphorylation and subsequent ROS generation is increased in the absence of Clec12 signaling [64]. Glycophorin A, a sialylated erythrocyte membrane glycoprotein, engages PMN via the ITIM-containing inhibitory receptor Siglec 9 to suppress PMN activation and down-regulate the oxidative response [65]. Similarly, murine PMN lacking Siglec E have an enhanced oxidative burst following stimulation compared to WT PMN [66]. The ITIM containing immunoreceptor PIR-B also plays a role in the regulation of PMN activation and inflammatory function with PIR-B deficient PMN displaying increased ROS production compared to PMN from WT mice [26]. Lastly, CEACAM-1 (CD66a) is the only ITIM domain containing carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) expressed by PMN. LPS triggers initial phosphorylation of Syk followed by CEACAM-1 mediated recruitment of SHP-1 resulting in inhibition of IL-1β production and negative fine-tuning of the immune response. As such, PMN from Ceacam-1−/− mice challenged with LPS exhibit an augmented oxidative burst [67].
Given the requirement for PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 during the oxidative burst, it has been reported that the phosphatase PTEN, which converts PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 back to PtdIns(3,4)P2, is a physiological suppressor of chemoattractant induced PMN ROS release. As such, increased PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 signaling in PTEN deficient PMN corresponds with enhanced Akt phosphorylation, augmented actin polymerization as well as increased fMLF-triggered superoxide production [41]. In addition to the role of Src family kinases in ROS production, it has also been reported that Btk, a member of the Tec-family kinases involved in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, down-regulates the amplitude of the PMN oxidative burst. Therefore, following TLR stimulation PMN from Btk−/− mice had increased activation of key signaling molecules involved in NADPH oxidase activation, increased targeting of Rac-2 to the plasma membrane, increased PI3K activation and increased ROS release [68].
Negative regulation of PMN degranulation
PMN granules contain large amounts of antimicrobial peptides, proteases, respiratory burst oxidases as well as membrane bound receptors and adhesion receptors that allow PMN to rapidly respond to and destroy invading pathogens. As tissue-damaging effects of PMN are dependent on the release of microbiocidal PMN granule contents, degranulation is a highly regulated process subject to both positive and negative regulation. Bcr and Abr, are two GTPases-activating proteins (GAPS) with activity towards Rho family GTPases that have been reported to negatively regulate PMN function in vivo. Cunnick et al showed these two proteins share some overlapping functions while also performing distinct functions [40]. BM PMN from double KO mice (Abr−/−Bcr−/−) have elevated levels of activated Rac1 and Rac2 in response to fMLF and cytochalasin B, leading to increased MPO and elastase release compared with WT PMN. However, lactoferrin release, gelatinase release and CD11b surface expression did not differ between Abr−/−Bcr−/− PMN and WT PMN, indicating that exocytosis of primary granules, but not secondary granules, tertiary granules, or secretory vesicles are negatively regulated by Bcr and Abr [40].
There is abundant evidence that Src family kinases play a pivotal role in PMN degranulation. C-Terminal Scr kinase (Csk) is a regulator of Src kinases that contributes to the control of acute inflammation in vivo through phosphorylation of C-terminal inhibitory tyrosine residues [69]. In a mouse model, Csk deficiency in granulocytes (Csk-GEcre), results in hypersensitivity to LPS, increased integrin-dependent adhesion, and exaggerated spontaneous and adhesion-dependent degranulation of secondary granules as measured by lactoferrin release [70]. In Csk deficient PMN, crosslinking of integrins or Fc receptors leads to increased Hck activity that induces hyper-phosphorylation of Syk, paxillin, and cortactin which promotes polymerization and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. This suggests that Csk suppress exocytosis of secondary granules through negative regulation of cytoskeletal remodeling downstream of Fc receptors and integrin activation [70].
Cytokine mediated inhibition of PMN phagocytosis has also been reported. Specifically, exocytosis of tertiary (gelatinase) granules in response to S. aureus was inhibited by IL-20 in TNFα-primed PMN [53]. Tertiary granules are more highly associated with actin than primary and secondary granule populations. The regulatory mechanism of IL-20 in TNFα-primed PMN is dependent on ERK1/2 activation and F-actin polymerization. These recent studies highlight the need for increased understanding of negative regulation of PMN activation/resolution of inflammation downstream of host-derived cytokines such as IL-20.
Negative immune regulators of PMN Apoptosis
To achieve and maintain homeostasis, circulating PMN die via constitutive apoptosis and are cleared by macrophages in the liver, spleen and BM. Given the short half-life of PMN, suppression of apoptosis is also essential to facilitate the extended PMN life span observed in the tissues during infection/inflammation. Several agents that prime or activate human PMN including, cytokines, GM-CSF, C5a, LPS, InsP6 and LTB4 are also reported to prolong PMN survival and down-regulate apoptosis [71]. In particular, PI3K/Akt signaling plays a pivotal role in PMN survival/suppression of apoptosis. Akt-mediated phosphorylation inactivates caspase-9 and stops the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bax from associating with mitochondria [72]. In addition, inactivation of the Akt target GSK3β prevents phosphorylation, ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation of the pro-survival Bcl-2 family member Mcl-1 (Fig. 2) [72]. Mechanistically, it has been reported that in apoptotic PMN, accumulated ROS inhibits actin-mediated-PI3Kγ-dependent PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 generation, thus blocking Akt activation and allowing apoptosis to proceed [73]. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PNCA) also functions as a PMN anti-apoptotic mediator that binds constitutively to pro-caspases-3, −8 and −9 and blocks their proteolytic processing and activation [74]. Elevated levels of the second messenger cyclic AMP can also prolong PMN lifespan by delaying apoptosis. Though the exact mechanism behind this has yet to be fully elucidated, it has been reported that increased intracellular cAMP levels delay PMN apoptosis via a transcriptionally independent pathway, independent of PI3K activity that involves inhibition of caspase 3 activation and a loss in mitochondrial potential. Another signaling mechanism employed by PMN to delay apoptosis is augmenting production of the second messenger PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and thus, increasing Akt activation. As such, depleting PTEN increases PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 levels, dramatically delays spontaneous apoptosis of PMN in vitro [75], and reduces apoptosis of PMN in inflamed alveolar air spaces [43]. The Src family kinase member Lyn is also an important tyrosine kinase for transducing anti-apoptotic signaling in PMN [76]. ITIM mediated signaling also regulates PMN apoptosis. In particular binding of CD47 to SIRPα induces ITIM phosphorylation and recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2 ultimately resulting in the inhibition of PMN apoptosis [77]. As such, increased PMN surface expression of CD47 is associated with a delay in apoptosis and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients [78]. Finally, recent studies have demonstrated that sialylated erythrocyte surface glycans engage the inhibitory immunoreceptor Siglec 9 on circulating PMN to suppress activation and apoptosis [65].
Inhibition of PMN NET release
Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release represents an additional PMN extracellular antimicrobial function that can also lead to an alternative form of PMN cell death (NETosis) that is distinct from necrosis or apoptosis. Negative regulation aimed at dampening NET formation remains largely unstudied despite recognition of the contribution of NETs to vascular damage and autoimmunity [79, 80]. However, it would be logical to think that ITIM mediated negative regulation of NADPH-dependent ROS production and degranulation of primary granules would also suppress NET formation (Fig. 2). Signal inhibitor receptor on leukocytes-1 (SIRL-1) is an inhibitory receptor, exclusively expressed in myeloid cells, that contains two canonical ITIMs essential for its inhibitory function. While the endogenous ligands for SIRL-1 are yet to be identified, cross-linking of SIRL-1 has been shown to dampen MEK-ERK signaling and suppress spontaneous NET release in PMN from individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [81]. Moreover, ligation of SIRL-1 also reduces NET formation in PMN from control donors when incubated with plasma from SLE patients [81]. In addition, NET formation induced by opsonized S. aureus, and monosodium urate is suppressed by SIRL-1 [82]. In contrast, cross-linking of SIRL-1 does not reduce NET formation when human PMN were exposed to non-opsonized S. aureus or to the TLR4 agonist LPS, indicating SIRL-1 regulates NET formation only in response to specific signals. Importantly, phagocytosis and ROS production remain intact following crosslinking of SIRL-1. Therefore, SIRL-1 specifically regulates cellular pathways required for extracellular NET formation, but not intracellular microbial killing [82].
The ITIM containing immunoreceptors Siglec 9 and Siglec 5 also deliver inhibitory signals that dampen NET formation by human PMN. As discussed above, PMN activation in the circulation is suppressed by erythrocyte sialoglycoproteins interacting with Siglec 9 [65]. In addition, increased concentrations of erythrocytes significantly reduced extracellular DNA release by PMN in response to PMA. Further, this effect was lost when the side chains of the terminal sialic acids were selectively and specifically modified to reduce erythrocyte binding to Siglec 9, proving a specific sialic acid mediated interaction. Incubation of PMN with platelets resulted in inhibition of other PMN functions including apoptosis [83]. However, whether or not platelets can contribute to dampening NET formation through the interaction of their rich sialic acid covered surfaces with PMN Siglec 9 has not yet been reported. Siglec 9 also binds high molecular weight hyaluronan (HMW-HA), which is abundantly expressed in many tissues including synovium, skin, heart valves, etc. While low molecular weight hyaluronan (LMW-HA) is released under inflammatory conditions and can induce pro-inflammatory cytokines, cell proliferation and angiogenesis, HMW-HA mitigates the inflammatory response by binding CD44 and Siglec 9 on PMN. The interaction of HMW-HA with CD44 reduces NET formation induced by PMA. Moreover, the interaction of HMW-HA with Siglec 9 increases SHP-1 recruitment and suppresses not only NET formation, but also apoptosis and oxidative burst by PMA-stimulated PMN as mentioned above [84].
Interestingly, some human pathogens, including Group A (GAS) and Group B (GBS) Streptococcus, interact with PMN Siglecs through their capsular polysaccharide components to down-regulate PMN activation and increase the rate of bacterial survival [84–87]. GAS expresses a HMW-HA capsule and GBS displays terminal sialic acids, both of which are able to engage Siglec 9 and block NET formation [84, 86]. GBS also binds to Siglec 5 through β protein expressed in its capsule, resulting in inhibition of NET formation independent of sialic acid binding [85]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic human pathogen, does not synthetize sialic acid but it is able to absorb sialoglycoproteins from host serum that it uses to bind to PMN Siglec 9 thus suppressing PMN ROS release and NET formation [87].
Another family of proteins that play multiple roles in regulating PMN effector functions are the semaphorins. Semaphorins are transmembrane proteins that bind several receptors, i.e. plexins B1/B2 and CD72 [88]. Recently it has been reported that binding of PMN expressed semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D) to its endothelial expressed receptor Plexin B2 results in activation of the SEMA4D intracellular domain, decreased Rac activation and inhibition of anti-PMN cytoplasmic-induced oxidative burst and NET release [89].
Conclusions
PMN exert important effector functions in order to provide host defense against bacterial and fungal infections. Activation of PMN functions is initiated by receptor-ligand binding events and modulated by an array of intracellular signaling pathways. Insufficient PMN activity renders the host susceptible to repeated infections, which can be life-threatening. Yet, dysregulated PMN activation can result in excessive collateral damage to the host, as exemplified by a range of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Therefore, PMN activation must be tightly regulated to protect the host from pathogen assaults without inducing detrimental inflammation and tissue damage.
This review provides an overview of immune signaling pathways that negatively regulate PMN function with a particular emphasis on PMN regulation through ITIM-bearing inhibitory receptors (Table 1). Despite the existence of a number of studies describing negative regulation of PMN function downstream of cell surface receptor engagement, many questions remain. For example, it is not well understood how single classes of PMN inhibitory receptors can differentially respond to various extracellular stimuli to specifically downregulate discrete PMN effector functions. Similarly, it is yet to be determined how different PMN inhibitory receptors can exert discrete functional responses to the same extracellular signals. While we have focused on suppression of PMN functions by intrinsic pathways it is also known that PMN activation in inflamed tissues is regulated by specialized pro-resolution mediators (secreted by epithelial and immune cells) including resolvins, protectins and maresins which favor deactivation of PMN and the resolution of inflammation. The identification of new drug targets aimed at downregulating PMN activation may be useful for reducing the uncontrolled inflammation that is characteristic of septic shock, chronic inflammatory conditions and autoimmune diseases. Therefore, increased understanding of the mechanisms that negatively regulate PMN function is likely to have profound biologic and pharmacologic relevance.
Table 1:
Effector molecules and inhibitory receptors found on PMN. Top table shows effector molecules playing a role in negative regulation of PMN functions. Bottom table shows inhibitory receptors found on PMN. First column shows the most common names found on human PMN inhibitory receptors. The second column shows the orthologues found in mouse PMN. All inhibitory receptors possess at least one immunoreceptor tyrosine- based inhibitory motif (ITIM). Other receptors without an ITIM domain are able to suppress PMN functions.
| Effector | PMN Function | Gene | Reference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinases: | ||||||||
| Csk | Degranulation | Csk | 70 | |||||
| Akt | Apoptosis | Akt, Pkb, | 72, 73, 75 | |||||
| Src family kinases: | ||||||||
| Hck | Granulopoiesis, Trafficking | Hck | 27 | |||||
| Fgr | Trafficking | Fgr, Src2 | 27 | |||||
| Lyn | Trafficking, Apoptosis | Lyn, Jtk8 | 6, 15,16, 76 | |||||
| Small GTPases and regulators: | ||||||||
| RhoA/B | Trafficking, ROS | Rhoa, Arha; Rhob, Arhb | 38 | |||||
| Vav1 | ROS | Vav1 | 59 | |||||
| Tipe2 | ROS | Tnfaip8l2 | 60 | |||||
| Arap3 | ROS | Arap3, Centd3 | 62 | |||||
| ARHGAP25 | Trafficking, Phagocytosis | Arhgap25 | 39, 57 | |||||
| ARHGAP15 | Phagocytosis | Arhgap15 | 56 | |||||
| Abr | Trafficking, Degranulation | Abr | 40 | |||||
| Bcr | Trafficking, Degranulation, ROS | Bcr | 40, 61 | |||||
| Phosphatases: | ||||||||
| Wip1 (PP2Cd) | Granulopoiesis | Wip1, Ppm1d | 20 | |||||
| SHP-1 | Trafficking, ROS, Apoptosis, NETosis | Ptpn6 Hcp, Ptp1c | 15, 24, 32-34, 64, 67, 77, 84 | |||||
| SHP-2 | Trafficking, ROS, Apoptosis | Ptpn11, Ptp2c | 24, 66, 77 | |||||
| PTP1B | Trafficking, Phagocytosis | Ptpn1, Ptb1b | 35–37 | |||||
| PTEN | Trafficking, Phagocytosis, Apoptosis | Pten Mmac1, Tep1 | 41–43 | |||||
| Cytokines and suppressors: | ||||||||
| IL-20 | Trafficking, Phagocytosis | Il20 ZCYTO10 | 53, 54 | |||||
| SOCS-3 | Granulopoiesis, Trafficking | Socs3 | 7, 8, 51, 52 | |||||
|
Orthologue in mouse |
Ligand | PMN Function | Gene | References | ||||
| Inhibitory Receptors: | ||||||||
| PILRα | ND | CD99-like protein HSV-1: glycoprot B |
Trafficking | Pilra | 28 | |||
| LILRB3 | PIR-B | MHC-I and class I like molecules, Angiopoietin-like Protein 2 |
Trafficking, ROS |
Lilrb3 Pirb | 15, 26, 27 | |||
| SIRP-α | CD47, SF-A, SF-D | Trafficking, Apoptosis |
Sirpa | 15, 22, 23, 77 | ||||
| Siglec 5 | Siglec F | Sialic acid | NETosis | Siglec5 | 85 | |||
| Siglec 9 | Siglec E | Sialic acid, HMW-HA | NETosis, ROS, Apoptosis |
Siglec9 | 25, 65, 66, 83, 84, 86, 87 | |||
| SIRL-1 | Not in mouse | ND | NETosis | Vstm1 | 81, 82 | |||
| CD300a | Phosphatidylserine Phosphatidylethanolamine |
ROS |
Cd300a
Cmrf35h |
63 | ||||
| CEACAM1 (CD66a) |
CEACAM1P | CEACAM1 | ROS |
Ceacam1
Bgp, Bgp1 |
67 | |||
| CLEC12a | Clec12a | Uric acid | ROS |
Clec12a
Dcal2 |
64 | |||
| Receptors w/o ITIM domains: | ||||||||
| CXCR4 | CXCR4 | CXCL12 | Granulopoiesis | Cxcr4 | 9, 12–14 | |||
| CD47 (IAP) | CD47 | SIRP-α, -γ, TSP-1, −2 | Apoptosis | Cd47 | 78 | |||
| A(2A)AR | A(2A)AR | Adenosine | Trafficking |
Adora2a
Adora2 |
44, 45 | |||
| FPR2/ALX | FPR2 | Lipoxin A4, Annexin A1, serum amyloid A, Resolvin D1, formylated peptides. |
Trafficking | Fpr2 | 48–50 | |||
| Semaphorin4D | Semaphorin4D | Plexin B1/B2, CD72 | NETosis | Sema4D | 89 | |||
ND: not determined
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Awards from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DK07939211 and DK07256421) to C.A.P.; and the Career Development Awards from the Crohn’s and Colitis American Foundation (CCFA) to J.C.B. and V.A.
Abbreviations
- A(A2)AR
adenosine receptor
- BM
bone marrow
- CEACAM
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule
- Csk
C-terminal Scr kinase
- fMLF
formyl-methionyl-leucyl phenylalanine peptide
- GAP
GTPase activating proteins
- GEF
guanine nucleotide exchange factor
- G-CSF
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor
- G-CSFR
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor
- GPCR
G protein coupled receptor
- GRK
G protein coupled receptor kinase
- IBD
Inflammatory bowel disease
- ICAM-1
Intracellular Adhesion molecule-1
- IL
interleukin
- InsP6
Inositol hexakisphosphate
- ITAM
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif
- ITIM
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitor motif
- JAK
Janus kinase
- LFA-1
lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- LTB4
leukotriene B4
- NADPH
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
- NETs
Nuclear extracellular traps
- MPO
myeloperoxidase
- PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- PIAS
protein inhibitor of activated STAT
- PILRα
paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor-α
- PIR-B
paired immunoglobulin receptor
- PMN
polymorphonuclear neutrophils
- PNCA
proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- PtdIns(3,4,5)P3
Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate
- PtdIns(3,4)P2
Phosphatidylinositol 3,4-biphosphate
- PTEN
Phosphatase and tensin homolog
- PTP1B
protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B
- PTPN6
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 6; also known as SHP-1 in humans
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SDF-1
stromal derived factor
- SHIP-1
SH2 domain-containing inositol phosphatase-1
- SHP
SH2 domain-containing phosphatase
- Siglecs
Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectins
- SIRP-α
Signal regulatory protein-α
- SLE
systemic lupus erythematosus
- SOCS3
suppressor of cytokine signaling-3
- STAT
signal transducer and activator of transcription
- WHIM
warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathesis
- Wip-1
Wild-Type p53-induced phosphatase 1
- WT
wild type
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Brazil JC and Parkos CA (2016) Pathobiology of neutrophil-epithelial interactions. Immunol Rev 273, 94–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moraes TJ, Zurawska JH, Downey GP (2006) Neutrophil granule contents in the pathogenesis of lung injury. Curr Opin Hematol 13, 21–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wright HL, Moots RJ, Bucknall RC, Edwards SW (2010) Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49, 1618–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Futosi K, Fodor S, Mocsai A (2013) Neutrophil cell surface receptors and their intracellular signal transduction pathways. Int Immunopharmacol 17, 638–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Borregaard N (2010) Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33, 657–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mermel CH, McLemore ML, Liu F, Pereira S, Woloszynek J, Lowell CA, Link DC (2006) Src family kinases are important negative regulators of G-CSF-dependent granulopoiesis. Blood 108, 2562–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hortner M, Nielsch U, Mayr LM, Johnston JA, Heinrich PC, Haan S (2002) Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 is recruited to the activated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor and modulates its signal transduction. J Immunol 169, 1219–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boyle K, Egan P, Rakar S, Willson TA, Wicks IP, Metcalf D, Hilton DJ, Nicola NA, Alexander WS, Roberts AW, Robb L (2007) The SOCS box of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 contributes to the control of G-CSF responsiveness in vivo. Blood 110, 1466–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zou YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR (1998) Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393, 595–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Theilgaard-Monch K, Jacobsen LC, Borup R, Rasmussen T, Bjerregaard MD, Nielsen FC, Cowland JB, Borregaard N (2005) The transcriptional program of terminal granulocytic differentiation. Blood 105, 1785–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eash KJ, Greenbaum AM, Gopalan PK, Link DC (2010) CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murine bone marrow. J Clin Invest 120, 2423–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim HK, Luz Sierra De La, Williams M, C. K., Gulino AV., Tosato G. (2006) G-CSF down-regulation of CXCR4 expression identified as a mechanism for mobilization of myeloid cells. Blood 108, 812–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernandez PA, Gorlin RJ, Lukens JN, Taniuchi S, Bohinjec J, Francois F, Klotman ME, Diaz GA (2003) Mutations in the chemokine receptor gene CXCR4 are associated with WHIM syndrome, a combined immunodeficiency disease. Nat Genet 34, 70–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Eash KJ, Means JM, White DW, Link DC (2009) CXCR4 is a key regulator of neutrophil release from the bone marrow under basal and stress granulopoiesis conditions. Blood 113, 4711–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pereira S and Lowell C (2003) The Lyn tyrosine kinase negatively regulates neutrophil integrin signaling. J Immunol 171, 1319–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakata Y, Tomkowicz B, Gewirtz AM, Ptasznik A (2006) Integrin inhibition through Lyn-dependent cross talk from CXCR4 chemokine receptors in normal human CD34+ marrow cells. Blood 107, 4234–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fong AM, Premont RT, Richardson RM, Yu YR, Lefkowitz RJ, Patel DD (2002) Defective lymphocyte chemotaxis in beta-arrestin2- and GRK6-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 7478–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vroon A, Heijnen CJ, Raatgever R, Touw IP, Ploemacher RE, Premont RT, Kavelaars A (2004) GRK6 deficiency is associated with enhanced CXCR4-mediated neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro and impaired responsiveness to G-CSF in vivo. J Leukoc Biol 75, 698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Balabanian K, Levoye A, Klemm L, Lagane B, Hermine O, Harriague J, Baleux F, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Bachelerie F (2008) Leukocyte analysis from WHIM syndrome patients reveals a pivotal role for GRK3 in CXCR4 signaling. J Clin Invest 118, 1074–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu G, Hu X, Sun B, Yang T, Shi J, Zhang L, Zhao Y (2013) Phosphatase Wip1 negatively regulates neutrophil development through p38 MAPK-STAT1. Blood 121, 519–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ley K, Laudanna C, Cybulsky MI, Nourshargh S (2007) Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat Rev Immunol 7, 678–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu Y, Buhring HJ, Zen K, Burst SL, Schnell FJ, Williams IR, Parkos CA (2002) Signal regulatory protein (SIRPalpha), a cellular ligand for CD47, regulates neutrophil transmigration. J Biol Chem 277, 10028–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stenberg A, Karlsson A, Feuk-Lagerstedt E, Christenson K, Bylund J, Oldenborg A, Vesterlund L, Matozaki T, Sehlin J, Oldenborg PA (2014) Signal regulatory protein alpha is present in several neutrophil granule populations and is rapidly mobilized to the cell surface to negatively fine-tune neutrophil accumulation in inflammation. J Innate Immun 6, 553–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Favier B (2016) Regulation of neutrophil functions through inhibitory receptors: an emerging paradigm in health and disease. Immunol Rev 273, 140–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McMillan SJ, Sharma RS, McKenzie EJ, Richards HE, Zhang J, Prescott A, Crocker PR (2013) Siglec-E is a negative regulator of acute pulmonary neutrophil inflammation and suppresses CD11b beta2-integrin-dependent signaling. Blood 121, 2084–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pereira S, Zhang H, Takai T, Lowell CA (2004) The inhibitory receptor PIR-B negatively regulates neutrophil and macrophage integrin signaling. J Immunol 173, 5757–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang H, Meng F, Chu CL, Takai T, Lowell CA (2005) The Src family kinases Hck and Fgr negatively regulate neutrophil and dendritic cell chemokine signaling via PIR-B. Immunity 22, 235–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang J, Shiratori I, Uehori J, Ikawa M, Arase H (2013) Neutrophil infiltration during inflammation is regulated by PILRalpha via modulation of integrin activation. Nat Immunol 14, 34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giambelluca MS and Pouliot M (2017) Early tyrosine phosphorylation events following adenosine A2A receptor in human neutrophils: identification of regulated pathways. J Leukoc Biol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mocsai A, Ligeti E, Lowell CA, Berton G (1999) Adhesion-dependent degranulation of neutrophils requires the Src family kinases Fgr and Hck. J Immunol 162, 1120–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McGarrigle D and Huang XY (2007) GPCRs signaling directly through Src-family kinases. Sci STKE 2007, pe35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roach TI, Slater SE, White LS, Zhang X, Majerus PW, Brown EJ, Thomas ML (1998) The protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 regulates integrin-mediated adhesion of macrophages. Curr Biol 8, 1035–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abram CL, Roberge GL, Pao LI, Neel BG, Lowell CA (2013) Distinct roles for neutrophils and dendritic cells in inflammation and autoimmunity in motheaten mice. Immunity 38, 489–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nesterovitch AB, Gyorfy Z, Hoffman MD, Moore EC, Elbuluk N, Tryniszewska B, Rauch TA, Simon M, Kang S, Fisher GJ, Mikecz K, Tharp MD, Glant TT (2011) Alteration in the gene encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 6 (PTPN6/SHP1) may contribute to neutrophilic dermatoses. Am J Pathol 178, 1434–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Traves PG, Pardo V, Pimentel-Santillana M, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Mojena M, Rico D, Montenegro Y, Cales C, Martin-Sanz P, Valverde AM, Bosca L (2014) Pivotal role of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) in the macrophage response to pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory challenge. Cell Death Dis 5, e1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yue L, Xie Z, Li H, Pang Z, Junkins RD, Tremblay ML, Chen X, Lin TJ (2016) Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B Negatively Impacts Host Defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Am J Pathol 186, 1234–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Foronjy RF, Ochieng PO, Salathe MA, Dabo AJ, Eden E, Baumlin N, Cummins N, Barik S, Campos M, Thorp EB, Geraghty P (2016) Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B negatively regulates S100A9-mediated lung damage during respiratory syncytial virus exacerbations. Mucosal Immunol 9, 1317–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jennings RT, Strengert M, Hayes P, El-Benna J, Brakebusch C, Kubica M, Knaus UG (2014) RhoA determines disease progression by controlling neutrophil motility and restricting hyperresponsiveness. Blood 123, 3635–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Csepanyi-Komi R, Wisniewski E, Bartos B, Levai P, Nemeth T, Balazs B, Kurz AR, Bierschenk S, Sperandio M, Ligeti E (2016) Rac GTPase Activating Protein ARHGAP25 Regulates Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration in Mice. J Immunol 197, 2807–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cunnick JM, Schmidhuber S, Chen G, Yu M, Yi SJ, Cho YJ, Kaartinen V, Minoo P, Warburton D, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N (2009) Bcr and Abr cooperate in negatively regulating acute inflammatory responses. Mol Cell Biol 29, 5742–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Subramanian KK, Jia Y, Zhu D, Simms BT, Jo H, Hattori H, You J, Mizgerd JP, Luo HR (2007) Tumor suppressor PTEN is a physiologic suppressor of chemoattractant-mediated neutrophil functions. Blood 109, 4028–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sarraj B, Massberg S, Li Y, Kasorn A, Subramanian K, Loison F, Silberstein LE, von Andrian U, Luo HR (2009) Myeloid-specific deletion of tumor suppressor PTEN augments neutrophil transendothelial migration during inflammation. J Immunol 182, 7190–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li Y, Jia Y, Pichavant M, Loison F, Sarraj B, Kasorn A, You J, Robson BE, Umetsu DT, Mizgerd JP, Ye K, Luo HR (2009) Targeted deletion of tumor suppressor PTEN augments neutrophil function and enhances host defense in neutropenia-associated pneumonia. Blood 113, 4930–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hasko G and Pacher P (2008) A2A receptors in inflammation and injury: lessons learned from transgenic animals. J Leukoc Biol 83, 447–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Morrison RR, Tan XL, Ledent C, Mustafa SJ, Hofmann PA (2007) Targeted deletion of A2A adenosine receptors attenuates the protective effects of myocardial postconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293, H2523–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lim LH, Solito E, Russo-Marie F, Flower RJ, Perretti M (1998) Promoting detachment of neutrophils adherent to murine postcapillary venules to control inflammation: effect of lipocortin 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 14535–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chatterjee BE, Yona S, Rosignoli G, Young RE, Nourshargh S, Flower RJ, Perretti M (2005) Annexin 1-deficient neutrophils exhibit enhanced transmigration in vivo and increased responsiveness in vitro. J Leukoc Biol 78, 639–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Filep JG, Zouki C, Petasis NA, Hachicha M, Serhan CN (2002) Lipoxin A4 and aspirin-triggered 15-epi-lipoxin A4 modulate adhesion molecule expression on human leukocytes in whole blood and inhibit neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion. Adv Exp Med Biol 507, 223–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dufton N, Hannon R, Brancaleone V, Dalli J, Patel HB, Gray M, D’Acquisto F, Buckingham JC, Perretti M, Flower RJ (2010) Anti-inflammatory role of the murine formyl-peptide receptor 2: ligand-specific effects on leukocyte responses and experimental inflammation. J Immunol 184, 2611–2619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stalder AK, Lott D, Strasser DS, Cruz HG, Krause A, Groenen PM, Dingemanse J (2017) Biomarker-guided clinical development of the first-in-class anti-inflammatory FPR2/ALX agonist ACT-389949. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83, 476–486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu Y, Holdbrooks AT, Meares GP, Buckley JA, Benveniste EN, Qin H (2015) Preferential Recruitment of Neutrophils into the Cerebellum and Brainstem Contributes to the Atypical Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Phenotype. J Immunol 195, 841–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wong PK, Egan PJ, Croker BA, O’Donnell K, Sims NA, Drake S, Kiu H, McManus EJ, Alexander WS, Roberts AW, Wicks IP (2006) SOCS-3 negatively regulates innate and adaptive immune mechanisms in acute IL-1-dependent inflammatory arthritis. J Clin Invest 116, 1571–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gough P, Ganesan S, Datta SK (2017) IL-20 Signaling in Activated Human Neutrophils Inhibits Neutrophil Migration and Function. J Immunol 198, 4373–4382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang W, Magadi S, Li Z, Smith CW, Burns AR (2017) IL-20 promotes epithelial healing of the injured mouse cornea. Exp Eye Res 154, 22–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jaffe AB and Hall A (2005) Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21, 247–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Costa C, Germena G, Martin-Conte EL, Molineris I, Bosco E, Marengo S, Azzolino O, Altruda F, Ranieri VM, Hirsch E (2011) The RacGAP ArhGAP15 is a master negative regulator of neutrophil functions. Blood 118, 1099–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Csepanyi-Komi R, Sirokmany G, Geiszt M, Ligeti E (2012) ARHGAP25, a novel Rac GTPase-activating protein, regulates phagocytosis in human neutrophilic granulocytes. Blood 119, 573–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nauseef WM (2007) How human neutrophils kill and degrade microbes: an integrated view. Immunol Rev 219, 88–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhao T, Benard V, Bohl BP, Bokoch GM (2003) The molecular basis for adhesion-mediated suppression of reactive oxygen species generation by human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 112, 1732–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang Z, Fayngerts S, Wang P, Sun H, Johnson DS, Ruan Q, Guo W, Chen YH (2012) TIPE2 protein serves as a negative regulator of phagocytosis and oxidative burst during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 15413–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Voncken JW, van Schaick H, Kaartinen V, Deemer K, Coates T, Landing B, Pattengale P, Dorseuil O, Bokoch GM, Groffen J, et al. (1995) Increased neutrophil respiratory burst in bcr-null mutants. Cell 80, 719–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gambardella L, Anderson KE, Nussbaum C, Segonds-Pichon A, Margarido T, Norton L, Ludwig T, Sperandio M, Hawkins PT, Stephens L, Vermeren S (2011) The GTPase-activating protein ARAP3 regulates chemotaxis and adhesion-dependent processes in neutrophils. Blood 118, 1087–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alvarez Y, Tang X, Coligan JE, Borrego F (2008) The CD300a (IRp60) inhibitory receptor is rapidly up-regulated on human neutrophils in response to inflammatory stimuli and modulates CD32a (FcgammaRIIa) mediated signaling. Mol Immunol 45, 253–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Neumann K, Castineiras-Vilarino M, Hockendorf U, Hannesschlager N, Lemeer S, Kupka D, Meyermann S, Lech M, Anders HJ, Kuster B, Busch DH, Gewies A, Naumann R, Gross O, Ruland J (2014) Clec12a is an inhibitory receptor for uric acid crystals that regulates inflammation in response to cell death. Immunity 40, 389–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lizcano A, Secundino I, Dohrmann S, Corriden R, Rohena C, Diaz S, Ghosh P, Deng L, Nizet V, Varki A (2017) Erythrocyte sialoglycoproteins engage Siglec-9 on neutrophils to suppress activation. Blood 129, 3100–3110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schwarz F, Pearce OM, Wang X, Samraj AN, Laubli H, Garcia JO, Lin H, Fu X, Garcia-Bingman A, Secrest P, Romanoski CE, Heyser C, Glass CK, Hazen SL, Varki N, Varki A, Gagneux P (2015) Siglec receptors impact mammalian lifespan by modulating oxidative stress. Elife 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lu R, Pan H, Shively JE (2012) CEACAM1 negatively regulates IL-1beta production in LPS activated neutrophils by recruiting SHP-1 to a SYK-TLR4-CEACAM1 complex. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Honda F, Kano H, Kanegane H, Nonoyama S, Kim ES, Lee SK, Takagi M, Mizutani S, Morio T (2012) The kinase Btk negatively regulates the production of reactive oxygen species and stimulation-induced apoptosis in human neutrophils. Nat Immunol 13, 369–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Okada M, Nada S, Yamanashi Y, Yamamoto T, Nakagawa H (1991) CSK: a protein-tyrosine kinase involved in regulation of src family kinases. J Biol Chem 266, 24249–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Thomas RM, Schmedt C, Novelli M, Choi BK, Skok J, Tarakhovsky A, Roes J (2004) C-terminal SRC kinase controls acute inflammation and granulocyte adhesion. Immunity 20, 181–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kennedy AD and DeLeo FR (2009) Neutrophil apoptosis and the resolution of infection. Immunol Res 43, 25–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rane MJ and Klein JB (2009) Regulation of neutrophil apoptosis by modulation of PKB/Akt activation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 14, 2400–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Xu Y, Loison F, Luo HR (2010) Neutrophil spontaneous death is mediated by down-regulation of autocrine signaling through GPCR, PI3Kgamma, ROS, and actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 2950–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chiara AD, Pederzoli-Ribeil M, Burgel PR, Danel C, Witko-Sarsat V (2012) Targeting cytosolic proliferating cell nuclear antigen in neutrophil-dominated inflammation. Front Immunol 3, 311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhu D, Hattori H, Jo H, Jia Y, Subramanian KK, Loison F, You J, Le Y, Honczarenko M, Silberstein L, Luo HR (2006) Deactivation of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate/Akt signaling mediates neutrophil spontaneous death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 14836–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wei S, Liu JH, Epling-Burnette PK, Gamero AM, Ussery D, Pearson EW, Elkabani ME, Diaz JI, Djeu JY (1996) Critical role of Lyn kinase in inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Immunol 157, 5155–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fujioka Y, Matozaki T, Noguchi T, Iwamatsu A, Yamao T, Takahashi N, Tsuda M, Takada T, Kasuga M (1996) A novel membrane glycoprotein, SHPS-1, that binds the SH2-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in response to mitogens and cell adhesion. Mol Cell Biol 16, 6887–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Barrera L, Montes-Servin E, Hernandez-Martinez JM, Garcia-Vicente MLA, Montes-Servin E, Herrera-Martinez M, Crispin JC, Borbolla-Escoboza JR, Arrieta O (2017) CD47 overexpression is associated with decreased neutrophil apoptosis/phagocytosis and poor prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Br J Cancer 117, 385–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Knight JS, Carmona-Rivera C, Kaplan MJ (2012) Proteins derived from neutrophil extracellular traps may serve as self-antigens and mediate organ damage in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 3, 380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Meegan JE, Yang X, Coleman DC, Jannaway M, Yuan SY (2017) Neutrophil-mediated vascular barrier injury: Role of neutrophil extracellular traps. Microcirculation 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Van Avondt K, Fritsch-Stork R, Derksen RH, Meyaard L (2013) Ligation of signal inhibitory receptor on leukocytes-1 suppresses the release of neutrophil extracellular traps in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One 8, e78459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Van Avondt K, van der Linden M, Naccache PH, Egan DA, Meyaard L (2016) Signal Inhibitory Receptor on Leukocytes-1 Limits the Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps, but Preserves Intracellular Bacterial Killing. J Immunol 196, 3686–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Andonegui G, Trevani AS, Lopez DH, Raiden S, Giordano M, Geffner JR (1997) Inhibition of human neutrophil apoptosis by platelets. J Immunol 158, 3372–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Secundino I, Lizcano A, Roupe KM, Wang X, Cole JN, Olson J, Ali SR, Dahesh S, Amayreh LK, Henningham A, Varki A, Nizet V (2016) Host and pathogen hyaluronan signal through human siglec-9 to suppress neutrophil activation. J Mol Med (Berl) 94, 219–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Carlin AF, Chang YC, Areschoug T, Lindahl G, Hurtado-Ziola N, King CC, Varki A, Nizet V (2009) Group B Streptococcus suppression of phagocyte functions by protein-mediated engagement of human Siglec-5. J Exp Med 206, 1691–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Carlin AF, Uchiyama S, Chang YC, Lewis AL, Nizet V, Varki A (2009) Molecular mimicry of host sialylated glycans allows a bacterial pathogen to engage neutrophil Siglec-9 and dampen the innate immune response. Blood 113, 3333–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Khatua B, Bhattacharya K, Mandal C (2012) Sialoglycoproteins adsorbed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa facilitate their survival by impeding neutrophil extracellular trap through siglec-9. J Leukoc Biol 91, 641–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kumanogoh A and Kikutani H (2013) Immunological functions of the neuropilins and plexins as receptors for semaphorins. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 802–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nishide M, Nojima S, Ito D, Takamatsu H, Koyama S, Kang S, Kimura T, Morimoto K, Hosokawa T, Hayama Y, Kinehara Y, Kato Y, Nakatani T, Nakanishi Y, Tsuda T, Park JH, Hirano T, Shima Y, Narazaki M, Morii E, Kumanogoh A (2017) Semaphorin 4D inhibits neutrophil activation and is involved in the pathogenesis of neutrophil-mediated autoimmune vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis 76, 1440–1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


