Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: Mutat Res. 1981 Apr;85(2):71–76. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(81)90022-4

INCREASED FREQUENCY OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN ALCOHOLICS

MERLIN G BUTLER 1, WARREN G SANGER 2, GEORGE E VEOMETT 3
PMCID: PMC6203930  NIHMSID: NIHMS991619  PMID: 7266565

Summary

The frequency of SCEs was significantly increased in the alcoholics analyzed (10.6 ± SD 0.66) when compared to the frequency of a control group (8.4 ± SD 0.51). Statistical analysis of the data obtained showed that the increase was not apparently related to age, sex, cigarette smoking, duration in years of alcohol abuse, nutritional status or type of alcoholic beverage commonly consumed by the individual.

Alcoholics recovering for at least one year from alcohol abuse were examined and the frequency of SCEs was found to be equal to the SCE frequency in the control group.

There was no statistical significance between the age, sex of the individual, smoking history and years of abstention from alcohol abuse with respect to the frequency of SCEs. Therefore, one year of abstention appears sufficient to allow the SCE frequency to return to that found in the control group.

In order to keep extraneous factors at a minimum and to analyze the effect of a particular factor, such as alcohol, on the number of SCEs, a careful medical history and screening program was followed. However, more information is needed to determine which factors play a role in causing genetic damage and inducing SCEs and to determine the significance SCEs may have with respect to genetic information and function.


Sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) are considered indicators of genetic damage (Latt, 1974; Lambert et al., 1978) and have been used to investigate the effect that common factors found in the environment such as cigarette smoking (Lambert et al., 1978; Hollander et al., 1978) to chemotherapeutic agents such as chlorambucil (Solomon and Bobrow, 1975) may have on genetic stability. Several chemical mutagens and carcinogens increase the frequency in mammalian cells in in vitro (Perry and Evans, 1975) and in vivo tests (Vogel and Bauknecht, 1976).

One chemical that has been implicated in chromosome changes is alcohol (Obe et al., 1977). Obe and Herha (1975) found increased chromosome aberrations in alcoholics. In further investigations, Obe and Ristow (1977) found that acetaldehyde, a metabolic derivative of alcohol, induced SCEs while SCE induction did not occur with ethanol in in vitro studies. Later, Obe et al. (1979) found increased SCEs in bone-marrow cells of mice that were exposed to ethanol and acetaldehyde in in vivo studies. Inadequate data are available with regard to SCEs in alcoholics, therefore, evidence compiled from 11 alcoholic, 10 control and 9 recovering alcoholic subjects is presented which indicated an increased SCE frequency in alcoholics compared with a control group.

Materials and methods

All subjects in this study were equally questioned about previous diseases, nutritional status, medical treatment, and X-ray investigation, as well as exposure to environmental and occupational hazards. Their smoking history and alcohol consumption (drinking history, type of beverages, amount and frequency) were also recorded.

10 control subjects with no history of significant illnesses, and no medication or X-rays within the past 6 months were selected (Table 1). They were not knowingly exposed to environmental or occupational hazards and their nutrition was adequate. 2 subjects smoked cigarettes (≤20 per day). Each control subject denied ingesting alcohol on a regular basis at present or in the past and admitted to consuming less than one drink per week.

TABLE 1.

NUTRITION, SMOKING AND DRINKING HISTORY OF THE CONTROL SUBJECTS

Initial Age Sex Nutritional status Smoking history Alcohol abuse Mean of SCEs
PD 28 male adequate none none 8.3
RIB 27 female adequate none none 8.2
GD 58 male adequate none none 8.2
JP 41 female adequate none none 7.7
MAS 28 male adequate none none 8.1
RD 25 female adequate none none 9.0
MGB 27 male adequate none none 8.1
AV 28 male adequate 20 cigarettes/day none 8.5
KKS 28 female adequate none none 8.3
CW 34 female adequate 10 cigarettes/day none 9.5

11 alcoholics were selected for this study (Table 2). These subjects were equally questioned with the control group. No subject was on medication nor recently exposed to X-rays or other known environmental hazards and the nutritional status was adequate, judged on appearance and history, in 5 of the 11 subjects. 10 subjects smoked cigarettes with an average of 20 cigarettes per day and a range of 10—45 cigarettes per day. Alcohol had been heavily ingested for 6—30 years by these alcoholics with an average of 17.1 years.

TABLE 2.

NUTRITION, SMOKING AND DRINKING HISTORY OF THE ALCOHOLIC SUBJECTS

Initial Age Sex Mean of SCEs Nutritional status Smoking history Alcohol consumption
Duration (years) Kind Quantity/day
BH 27 male 11.3 inadequate 10 cigarettes/day 13 wine 1 quart
JW 50 female 10.7 inadequate 10 cigarettes/day 25 wine 1 quart
AB 53 male 10.4 inadequate 10 cigarettes/day 30 no pref. not known
GS 44 male 10.1 inadequate 10 cigarettes/day 25 no pref. not known
JG 39 male 10.3 adequate none 23 beer >1 gallon
AZ 37 male 10.1 adequate 10 cigarettes/day 10 no pref. not known
JM 25 male 10.2 adequate 45 cigarettes/day   6 vodka 1 quart
HY 46 male 9.6 inadequate 40 cigarettes/day 15 whiskey 1.25 quarts
LB 40 male 10.8 adequate 15 cigarettes/day 20 beer >1 gallon
GB 19 female 11.5 adequate 30 cigarettes/day   6 beer >1 gallon
AL 25 female 11.7 inadequate 20 cigarettes/day 15 wine 1 quart

9 recovering alcoholics were included in this study (Table 3). The criteria for a subject to be selected for this group included the abstention from alcohol use for a minimum of one year and successful completion of an alcohol-dependency program. The average time of recovery was 4.4 years with a range of 1—10 years. Previously, the subjects had an average duration of alcohol abuse of 14.6 years with a range of 7—35 years. No significant abnormalities in their medical history were found including the use of medication and exposure to X-rays and environmental hazards. Their nutrition was adequate. 7 subjects smoked cigarettes with an average of 24 cigarettes per day and a range of 7—60 cigarettes per day.

TABLE 3.

NUTRITION, SMOKING AND DRINKING HISTORY OF THE RECOVERING ALCOHOLIC SUBJECTS

Initial Age Sex Nutritional status Smoking history Years recovering Years of alcohol abuse Mean of SCEs
AB 24 female adequate 7 cigarettes/day 3 15 8.2
LB 31 male adequate 60 cigarettes/day 1 10 8.7
EW 41 male adequate 10 cigarettes/day 4 10 8.8
AM 20 female adequate 40 cigarettes/day 1.25   7 8.2
SM 31 male adequate none 6 10 8.5
JV 40 male adequate 10 cigarettes/day 3.5 20 7.8
LES 58 male adequate none 10 35 8.6
LZ 57 male adequate 10 cigarettes/day 8 20 8.2
GP 29 female adequate 30 cigarettes/day 3   4 8.6

Peripheral blood (0.4 ml) was added to basal medium—Eagle’s containing 20% fetal calf serum, antibiotics, and 20 μM 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Phytohemagglutinin-M (Gibco) was added and the cultures were incubated at 37°C in complete darkness. At 69 h, colcemid (Gibco) was added and the cells harvested at 72 h then treated with hypotonic saline and fixed in 3 : 1 methanol—acetic acid. Air-dried slides were stored in darkness for 24 h then stained with the flurescence plus Giemsa (FPG) technique (Perry and Wolff, 1974). The slides were analyzed for SCEs and the SCE frequency for each subject was based on the number of SCEs in a minimum of 15 cells.

Results and discussion

The average SCE frequency in the alcoholic subjects analyzed was 10.6 while the frequency in the control subjects was 8.4 (Table 4). The Mann Whitney U test was applied to the SCE data and a significant difference was found (p < 0.001). Because of this significant difference between the number of SCEs of the alcoholic and control subjects, SCEs from recovering alcoholic subjects of at least one year duration were analyzed. The average number of SCEs found in this group was 8.4 which equaled the SCE frequency in the control group (Table 4). Hence, the SCE frequency in this situation may change within individuals and once a mutagenic agent, such as alcohol, is removed from the environment then the number of SCEs appears to return to the level observed before the mutagenic exposure.

TABLE 4.

FREQUENCY OF SCEs FROM CONTROLS, ALCOHOLICS AND RECOVERING ALCOHOLICS

Subjects Number Age
Sex
M/F
Average number of SCEs (group mean ± SD range)
Total number of cells analyzed
Mean Range
per cell per individual
Controls 10 32.4 25—58 5/5 8.4 ± 0.51 7.7— 9.5 252
Alcoholics 11 36.8 19—53 8/3 10.6 ± 0.66 9.6—11.7 258
Recovering alcoholics   9 36.8 20—58 6/3 8.4 ± 0.32 7.8— 8.8 188

In order to identify a possible cause of the increased SCE frequency in the alcoholics, the age, sex, smoking, drinking and nutritional history between the 3 groups were analyzed with the Mann—Whitney U, Spearman rank correlation and chi-square tests. No significant difference between sexes, or age classes of the 3 groups was found by the use of these statistical tests.

Statistical studies were also undertaken to determine the relationship, if any, between the years of alcohol consumption, the type of beverage, smoking history and nutritional status with respect to the SCE frequency. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient of −0.111 is evidence that the number of years of alcohol abuse was not considered significant in increasing the frequency of SCEs and SCE frequency does not continually increase with the years of alcohol consumption by the alcoholics.

Obe et al. (1977) has theorized that the agent responsible for the increased chromosomal aberrations in alcoholics may be the ingredients found in alcoholic beverages other than alcohol. To examine the possible relationship between the number of SCEs and the beverage most commonly consumed by the alcoholics in this study, the Mann—Whitney U test was used. The test showed no significance between the type of beverage (wine, beer, vodka, whiskey) consumed and the number of SCEs; therefore, no particular beverage was found to induce the SCE frequency.

Armendares et al. (1971) and Khouri and McLaren (1973) found in protein-calorie malnutrition studies that chromosome aberrations were above normal. The eiology was thought to be due to a distorted internal environment or inefficent cellular repair mechanism of the chromosome (Hillman, 1974). Protein malnutrition is often observed in alcoholics; therefore, the nutritional status of the individual must be considered in examining chromosome damage and SCEs.

The nutritional status of each alcoholic was judged as adequate or inadequate based on history and appearance with 5 of the 11 alcoholics having adequate nutrition. The chi-square method was used to examine the relationship, if any, between the nutritional status of the individual and the number of SCEs. The values calculated were not significant. Therefore, the induction of SCEs is not apparently related to nutrition in the alcoholics studied.

Cigarette smoking has been reported to increase SCEs in smokers when compared to non-smokers (Lambert et al., 1978). The induction of SCEs in smokers has not been supported by others (Hollander et al., 1978; Crossen and Morgan, 1980; Butler, 1980). The Spearman rank correlation test was used to compare the smoking history and the SCE frequency in the alcoholics and recovering alcoholic subjects. The coefficient for these variables in the alcoholic subjects was calculated to be 0.093 which showed little relationship between cigarette smoking and the number of SCEs. The coefficient for the recovering alcoholic subjects was 0.17. Thus, the number of cigarettes smoked per day had little relationship with the number of SCEs found in the alcoholic or recovering alcoholic subjects and should not be considered the cause of the higher number of SCEs in the alcoholic subjects.

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the Nebraska Department of Health and the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare. We thank Michael Schmidt for his technical assistance.

Contributor Information

MERLIN G. BUTLER, Center for Human Genetics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105

WARREN G. SANGER, Center for Human Genetics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105

GEORGE E. VEOMETT, School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68508 (U.S.A.)

References

  1. Armendares S, Salamanca F and Frenk S (1971) Chromosome abnormalities in severe protein calorie malnutrition, Nature (London), 232, 271–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler MG (1980) Sister chromatid exchange in cigarette smokers, Mammalian Chromosomes Newsl, in press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Crossen PE, and Morgan WF (1980) Sister chromatid exchanges in smokers. Hum. Genet, 53, 425–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hillman RW (1974) Alcoholism and malnutrition, in: Kissin B and Begleiter H (Eds.), The Biology of Alcoholism, 3, Plenum, New York, pp. 513–586. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hollander DH, Tockman MS, Liang YW and Borgaonkar DS (1978) SCE in peripheral blood of cigarette smokers and in lung cancer patients and the effect of chemotherapy. Hum. Genet, 44, 165–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Khouri FP, and McLaren DS (1973) Cytogenetic studies in protein-carlie malnutrition. Am. J. Hum. Genet, 25, 165–470. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lambert B, Morad M, Bredbert A, Swanbeck G and Thyresson-Hok M (1978) Sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes from patients treated with 8-methoxypsoralen and longwave ultraviolet light, Acta Dermatovenerol. (Stockholm), 58, 13–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Latt SA (1974) SCE indices of human chromosome damage and repair. Detection by fluorescence an and induction by mitomycin-C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.), 71, 3162–3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Obe G, and Herha J (1975) Chromosomal damage in chronic alcohol users, Humangenetik, 29, 191–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Obe G, and Ristow H (1977) Acetalhyde, but not ethanol, induces sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster cells in vitro. Mutation Res, 56, 211–213. [Google Scholar]
  11. Obe G, Ristow H and Herha J (1977) Chromosomal damage by alcohol in vitro and in vivo, in: Gross MM (Ed.), Alcohol Intoxication and Withdrawal, IIIa. Plenum, New York, pp. 47–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Obe G, Natarajan AT, Meyers M and den Hertog A (1979) Induction of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of human blood in vitro, and of SCEs in bone-marrow cells of mice in vivo by ethanol and its metabolite acetaldehyde. Mutation Res, 68, 291–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Perry P, and Evans HJ (1975) Cytological detection of mutagen—carcinogen exposure by sister chromatid exchange. Nature (London), 258, 121–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perry P, and Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differentiation staining of SCE, Nature (London), 251, 156–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Solomon E, and Bobrow M (1975) SCE — a sensitive assay of agents damaging human chromosomes, Mutation Res, 30, 273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vogel W, and Bauknecht T (1976) Differential chromatid staining by in vivo treatment as a mutagenicity test system, Nature (London), 260, 448–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES