Abstract
The 19F chemical shift is a sensitive NMR probe of structure and electronic environment in organic and biological molecules. In this report we examine chemical shift parameters of 4F-, 5F-, 6F-, and 7F-substituted crystalline tryptophan by magic angle spinning (MAS) solid-state NMR spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT). Significant narrowing of the 19F lines was observed under fast MAS conditions, at spinning frequencies above 50 kHz. The parameters characterizing the 19F chemical shift tensor are sensitive to the position of the fluorine in the aromatic ring and, to a lesser extent, the chirality of the molecule. Accurate calculations of 19F magnetic shielding tensors require the PBE0 functional with a 50% admixture of a Hartree-Fock exchange term, as well as taking account of the local crystal symmetry. The methodology developed will be beneficial for 19F-based MAS NMR structural analysis of proteins and protein assemblies.
Graphic Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Fluorine, or specifically, the magnetically active 19F isotope, is an excellent NMR probe for applications in biological and biochemical studies due to its favorable magnetic and chemical properties. Being a 100% naturally abundant spin-1/2 nucleus with a very high gyromagnetic ratio (third after 3H and 1H), it possesses 83% sensitivity compared to 1H. Fluorine chemical shifts are exquisitely sensitive to changes in local environment, because its magnetic shielding is dominated by a large paramagnetic term: the 19F chemical shift range is over 300 ppm, 30-fold larger than that of 1H.1–2 Fluorine is absent from virtually all naturally occurring biomolecules, small or large. In addition, fluorine can easily be biosynthetically incorporated into proteins in the context of either natural or unnatural amino acids or attached as a fluorinated tag to reactive amino acids, such as cysteine.1–5 In particular, tryptophan residues are often chosen for fluorine incorporation because of their relative sparseness in most proteins.6–7 Biosynthetic incorporation into proteins and peptides using standard E. coli expression systems is easy,3, 8–10 and the effects on conformation or biological activity of proteins upon fluorination are small, in most cases.3
Indeed, 19F has found interesting applications in NMR spectroscopy of biologically significant materials already.1–5, 10–12 In solution, 19F has been used as a probe to investigate protein folding,4 ligand binding,10 and conformational dynamics,2 including exciting applications to membrane proteins, such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).13–14 In the solid state, 19F chemical shift probes have been applied to membrane-associated peptides and proteins, using oriented samples and static experiments, as well as MAS NMR spectroscopy.15–21
One limitation that prevents the widespread use of fluorine as a NMR reporter in biochemical applications is the lack of a systematic understanding of the relationship between 19F chemical shifts and local environments. This knowledge gap exists because there are, at present, no robust protocols for quantum mechanical calculations of 19F chemical shifts. Such calculations have been traditionally difficult,22–23 due to the stringent requirements on the inclusion of electron-correlation terms, given the large number of electrons and free electron pairs in fluorine. Although earlier studies have suggested that Hartree-Fock self-consistent-field (HF SCF) or post-Hartree-Fock calculations are essential to compute accurate 19F chemical shifts,22, 24 recent reports suggest that density functional theory (DFT) can be used, provided that explicit solvent models are employed25 and appropriate hybrid functionals with sufficient exact exchange terms are applied.26–27 These developments are very promising.
Another challenge specific to 19F solid-state NMR spectroscopy arises from its generic broad lines,21 often limiting fluorine-based correlation experiments when multiple sites are present. Currently the literature on 19F magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR in biological systems is sparse, predominantly reporting on MAS studies at spinning frequencies below 25 kHz, although a recent study demonstrated resolution enhancements for sitagliptin at 35 kHz.28 Developing optimal experimental conditions necessary for the acquisition of high-quality datasets still need to be established.
To develop a robust protocol for 19F MAS NMR spectroscopy-based characterization of structure and dynamics in fluorinated solids, it is imperative to examine a sufficiently large number of model systems to benchmark 19F MAS NMR’s use for biological applications. In this report, we present a combined 19F MAS NMR and DFT study of fluorosubstituted tryptophans (Figure 1). We assess the dependence of the experimental 19F chemical shift tensor (CST) parameters on the fluorine position in the aromatic ring and the chirality of the tryptophan molecule. For 5F-L-Trp, 5F-L-Trp·H2O, and 6F-DL-Trp, whose crystal structures we solved, DFT calculations of 19F CST were carried out. Good agreement between experiment and theory was obtained when the PBE0 functional with a 50% admixture of Hartree-Fock exchange terms was employed. On the experimental side, the use of high MAS frequencies of over 50 kHz is essential to obtain sufficiently narrow lines. Overall, the integrated approach presented here should set the stage for a wide variety of applications in organic and biological systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fluorosubstituted tryptophans
4F-DL-tryptophan, 5F-L-tryptophan, 6F-L-tryptophan were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 5F-DL-tryptophan was purchased from MP Biomedicals, LLC (Santa Ana, CA). 6F-DL-tryprophan was purchased from Apollo Scientific Ltd (UK). 7F-DL-tryptophan was purchased from Amatec Chemical Co. Ltd (Hong Kong). For measurements of the powders, all fluorosubstituted tryptophans were used without further purification.
Crystallization of fluorosubstituted tryptophans and crystal structure determination
5F-L-tryptophan, 5F-DL-tryptophan, and 6F-DL-tryptophan were recrystallized from a 30% water/ethanol mixture. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained at ambient temperature. The details of the crystal structure determination are provided in the Supporting Information.
19F MAS NMR experiments
19F MAS NMR experiments on 4F-DL-tryptophan, 5F-DL-tryptophan, 5F-L-tryptophan, 6F-DL-tryptophan, 6F-L-tryptophan, and 7F-DL-tryptophan were carried out at room temperature (21 °C) on a 9.4 T NMR spectrometer comprised of a wide-bore Magnex Scientific magnet and a Bruker AVANCE console. The spectrometer was equipped with a 3.2 mm Varian T3 MAS HXY probe. The 19F Larmor frequency was 376.476 MHz. The samples comprised 20 mg of either 4F-DL-tryptophan, 5F-DL-tryptophan, 6F-DL-tryptophan, or 6F-L-tryptophan packed in a 3.2-mm Varian rotor. For 5F-L-tryptophan and 7F-DL-tryptophan, 10 mg and 4 mg of sample, were packed into rotors, respectively. 19F MAS NMR spectra were collected at MAS frequencies of 5 kHz, 7 kHz, 9 kHz, and 11 kHz, controlled to within ±10 Hz by a Tecmag MAS controller. The typical 19F 90° pulse length was 1.4 μs. During the odd-numbered transients, a 180° pulse was applied before the 90° excitation pulse to suppress 19F background signals. The recycle delay was 10 s.
19F MAS NMR experiments on 3.0 mg of 5F-DL-tryptophan, 3.0 mg of 5F-L-tryptophan, 1.8 mg of 6F-DL-tryptophan, and 2.2 mg of 6F-L-tryptophan, respectively, were also carried out on a Varian 14.1 T narrow bore magnet equipped with a Bruker AVIII HD spectrometer operating at 564.278 MHz and outfitted with a 1.3 mm Bruker HCN MAS probe. 19F MAS NMR spectra were collected at MAS frequencies of 8 kHz, 11 kHz (except for 5F-DL-tryptophan), 20 kHz, 30 kHz, 35 kHz, 40 kHz, 50 kHz, and 60 kHz; the frequencies were controlled to within ±5 Hz by a Bruker MAS controller. The actual sample temperature was calibrated using KBr as a temperature sensor and was maintained at 22±1 °C throughout the experiments using a Bruker temperature controller. The typical 19F 90° pulse length was 1.3 μs. The recycle delay was 3 s.
The effects of magnetic field strength and 1H decoupling were assessed using 19F MAS NMR experiments with 5F-DL-tryptophan. MAS NMR experiments were carried out on an 11.7 T wide-bore Bruker AVANCE III spectrometer outfitted with a 2.5 mm MAS HFX probe. Larmor frequencies were 500.1 MHz (1H) and 470.6 MHz (19F). 8 mg of 5F-DL-tryptophan were packed into a 2.5 mm thick-walled Bruker rotor. 19F MAS NMR spectra were collected at MAS frequencies of 5 kHz, 7 kHz, 11.111 kHz, and 30 kHz, with the frequencies controlled to within ± 5 Hz by a Bruker MAS controller. The actual sample temperature was calibrated using KBr as a temperature sensor and was maintained at 20±1°C throughout the experiments using a Bruker temperature controller. The typical 90° pulse lengths were 2.5 μs (1H), and 2.5 μs (19F). Single-pulse 19F spectra were acquired by using a small-angle excitation pulse with a pulse length of 0.5 μs. 1H TPPM decoupling29 (91 kHz) was used during the acquisition period. The recycle delay was 3 s.
MAS NMR experiments were also carried out on a 19.96 T Bruker AVANCE III spectrometer operating at 800.095 MHz, outfitted with a 1.9 mm MAS HX probe and a 1.6 mm MAS HFDXY Phoenix probe. 9 mg of 5F-DL-tryptophan were packed into a 1.9 mm thin-wall Bruker rotor. 19F MAS NMR spectra were collected at MAS frequencies of 11 kHz, 15 kHz, 30 kHz, and 40 kHz, and the frequencies were controlled to within ±5 Hz by a Bruker MAS controller. The actual sample temperature was calibrated using KBr as a temperature sensor and was maintained at 25±1 °C throughout the experiments using a Bruker temperature controller. The typical 90° pulse length for 19F was 1.8 μs. During the odd-numbered transients, a 180° pulse was applied before the 90° excitation pulse to suppress 19F background signals. The recycle delay was 3 s.
7.6 mg of 5F-DL-tryptophan were also packed into a 1.6 mm Varian rotor. 19F MAS NMR spectra were collected at a MAS frequency of 40 kHz, regulated to within ±5 Hz by a Bruker MAS controller. The typical 90° pulse lengths were 2.7 μs (1H), and 2.7 μs (19F). 1H TPPM decoupling (10 kHz) was used during the acquisition period. The recycle delay was 80 s.
19F chemical shifts were referenced to trifluoroacetic acid, TFA (100 μM solution in 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5), using an external reference (0 ppm).
All 19F MAS spectra were processed using TopSpin. Baseline correction was employed using manually defined baseline points.
Determination of chemical shift tensors
The principal components of 19F chemical shift tensors were determined by fitting the spinning sideband intensities according to the Herzfeld-Berger protocol.30 The peak intensities were obtained from TopSpin and were input into the HBA program, version 1.7.5.31
DFT calculations
19F magnetic shielding tensor calculations were carried out on 5F-L-TrpH2O, 5F-DL-Trp (L-form), and 6F-DL-Trp. For each, molecular clusters comprised of four molecules were generated from the crystal structures with GaussView, the graphical interface in Gaussian0932 (Figure 4A-C).
All-atom geometry optimizations were carried out in Gaussian09, using the B3LYP functional and 6–31G basis set. The 19F magnetic shielding tensor calculations were performed with the Amsterdam Density Functional Theory suite of programs33 (ADF2017), using a hybrid PBE0 functional with 50% Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange, and a TZ2P all-electron basis set (no frozen core). The numerical quality was set to ‘very good’ for each calculation using Becke integration. Magnetic shielding tensors were calculated only for the central fluorine atoms.
The 19F chemical shifts were referenced by converting absolute magnetic shieldings s into chemical shifts, using the relation δi = σref – σi, with the value of σref determined by linear regression between calculated and experimental shifts.34
SIMPSON and SIMMOL calculations
Calculations were performed for recrystallized 5F-L-Trp·H2O, 5F-DL-Trp (L-form), and 6F-DL-tryptophan. One fluorine in the crystal structure was chosen as the central atom and all other neighboring fluorines within 6 Å radius were considered for calculating dipolar coupling tensors. The SIMMOL program35 reads in the atomic coordinates of the selected fluorines in the PDB format, from which it generates dipolar couplings and Euler angles.
The spectra of the crystals were simulated in SIMPSON.36 The experimental CSA tensors (Table 1) at 14.1 T (19F Larmor frequency of 564.278 MHz) and a MAS frequency of 11 kHz were used, with and without the F-F couplings added from the X-ray structures.
Table 1.
Experiment (MAS NMR) | DFT Calculation (ADF, 4 molecules) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compound | δ11 (ppm) |
δ22 (ppm) |
δ33 (ppm) |
δiso (ppm) |
δσ (ppm) |
η | δ11 (ppm) |
δ22 (ppm) |
δ33 (ppm) |
δiso (ppm) |
δσ (ppm) |
η | |
Powder | 4F-DL-Trp | 11.2±1.4 | 48.3±0.5 | −112.8±0.8 | −50.0 | 62.8±0.8 | 0.9±0.0 | ||||||
5F-DL-Trp | 4.8±1.3 | −60.5±1.0 | −86.1±1.2 | −47.2 | 51.8±1.3 | 0.50±0.03 | |||||||
5F-L-Trp | −0.8±3.7 | −62.9±1.4 | −84.4±4.1 | −49.4 | 48.6±3.7 | 0.44±0.08 | |||||||
6F-DL-Trp | 12.9±1.4 | −51.2±0.5 | −91.6±1.4 | −43.3 | 56.2±1.4 | 0.72±0.02 | |||||||
6F-L-Trp | 12.6±1.1 | −50.7±2.8 | −91.3±1.9 | −43.2 | 55.7±1.2 | 0.7±0.1 | |||||||
7F-DL-Trp | 4.6±1.9 | −48.3±0.5 | −123.3±1.4 | −55.7 | 67.6±1.4 | 0.8±0.0 | |||||||
Crystal | 5F-L-Trp | −1.7±0.3 | −67.5±0.2 | −78.0±0.2 | −49.1 | 47.4±0.3 | 0.2±0.0 | 31.9 | −53.4 | −113.2 | −44.9 | 76.8 | 0.8 |
5F-L-Trp·H2O | 6.9±0.5 | −60.7±0.3 | −86.3±0.4 | −46.7 | 53.6±0.5 | 0.5±0.0 | 38.0 | −62.1 | −76.6 | −33.5 | 71.6 | 0.2 | |
6F-DL-Trp* | 11.0±0.8 | −45.2±0.4 | −95.7±0.6 | −43.3 | 54.3±0.8 | 0.9±0.0 | 17.8 | −61.2 | −117.2 | −53.6 | 71.3 | 0.8 | |
17.6 | −61.4 | −117.8 | −53.8 | 71.5 | 0.8 |
The DFT calculations of 6F-DL-Trp are reported as the individual values for the D- and L- enantiomers (top and bottom, respectively).
The peak intensities of the simulated spectra were obtained using NMRDRAW.37 These intensities and the isotropic chemical shifts (Table 1) were used in Herzfeld-Berger analysis for extracting the principal components of the tensors, the reduced anisotropy and the asymmetry parameter.
RESULTS
19F MAS NMR spectra of fluorosubstituted tryptophans
19F MAS NMR spectra of powder and crystalline tryptophan with fluorine substitutions in the 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-positions of the indole ring were acquired at magnetic field strengths of 9.4, 14.1, and 19.96 T, and at MAS frequencies ranging from 5 to 60 kHz (Figure 2, and S1-S2 of the Supporting Information). Increasing the MAS frequency from 20 to 60 kHz, in the absence of proton decoupling, results in dramatic line narrowing and increases in peak intensity, due to improved efficiency of the rotational averaging of 19F chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) and 1H-19F/19F-19F dipolar interactions (Figure 2; Table S1 of the Supporting Information). As can easily be appreciated from the comparison provided in Figure 2B, the spectral resolution attained for 5F-DL-tryptophan at 14.1 T and a MAS frequency of 60 kHz in the absence of decoupling is similar to that observed in experiments at 19.96 T and a MAS frequency of 40 kHz, in the presence of 1H decoupling. At 60 kHz, the linewidths are ~ 1 ppm for all samples under investigation, indicating that the non-recrystallized tryptophan powders are crystalline. This was confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction of 4F-DL-, 5F-DL-, 6F-L-, and 6F-DL- tryptophans (Figure S3 of the Supporting Information).
The above findings are important: they demonstrate that 19F MAS NMR spectroscopy can be widely applied, even in the absence of specialized probes that are capable of 1H decoupling while detecting 19F.
Experimental chemical shift tensors of fluorosubstituted tryptophans
To determine accurate 19F chemical shift parameters of the different fluorosubstituted tryptophans, we acquired 19F MAS spectra at different magnetic field strengths (9.4, 14.1, and 19.96 T) and at MAS frequencies ranging between 5 and 60 kHz. 19F isotropic shifts are summarized in Table 1. The MAS isotropic shifts of 4F-Trp and 6F-Trp are similar to the solution NMR values, to within 1 ppm, for fluorosubstituted L-Trp molecules.5 For 7F-L-Trp, a difference of 3.1 ppm is observed (the solution NMR shift is −58.8 ppm). Isotropic shifts range from −41.4 to −59.6 ppm, influenced by the position of the fluorine in the indole ring and the local environments. Interestingly, MAS isotropic shifts appear to be sensitive to the hydration state of the molecule, as seen for 5F-Trp (Figure 2C). The shift of −46.4 ppm appears to be associated with the monohydrate form of the 5F-L-Trp. The chemical shift of −48.7 ppm was observed in microcrystalline non-hydrated powders of 5F-DL-Trp (minor peak), 5F-L-Trp (major peak), and is the only species in the recrystallized 5F-DL-Trp. Interestingly, a pure L- enantiomer was detected in the single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. The L-conformation was assigned based on the handedness that gave values of the Flack parameter closest to zero, albeit the standard error values were high (see Supporting Information). The major resonance in the 5F-DL-Trp powder (−47.7 ppm) is assigned to the D-enantiomer by exclusion.
Representative spectra acquired at MAS frequencies ranging between 5 and 15 kHz are provided in Figure 3 (all spectra are shown in Figures S1-S2 of the Supporting Information). 19F CSTs have been previously determined for 5F-L, 5F-DL-, 6F-L- and 6F-DL-tryptophan, and the reported values for the reduced anisotropy parameter, δσ, for 5F-DL-Trp differ by 2.2 ppm for the MAS38 vs. the single-crystal static39 NMR study. These differences may be due to experimental uncertainties or, more likely, different crystal forms. In the present work, we recorded multiple MAS spectra for each compound, which permitted us to extract accurate CST parameters and assess the range of experimental errors in these measurements.
Experimental CST parameters were obtained by analyzing the spinning sideband intensities using the Herzfeld-Berger protocol.30 All values are summarized in Table 1. The reduced anisotropy parameters range between 48.6 and 67.6 ppm. The positioning of the fluorine in the indole ring exerts the largest effect on the shift, and smaller, but distinct, differences (0.5 – 3.2 ppm) are observed for molecules of different chirality. All of the tensors are rhombic, with the asymmetry parameters ranging from 0.44–0.50 (for 5F-Trp) to 0.95 (for 4F-Trp). Overall, pronounced differences in the CST parameters are observed, underscoring the remarkably high sensitivity of fluorine chemical shift tensors to local electronic structure.
CST parameters for every fluorosubstituted tryptophan and each set of spectra (Table S2 of the Supporting Information) permitted us to evaluate the experimental errors carefully. The experimental uncertainties in the 19F reduced anisotropy parameter δσ, extracted from the spinning sideband analyses of the MAS spectra, are of the order of 0.8–3.7 ppm, or 5–7% of the total magnitude of δσ. This error range is reasonable, since accurate values rely on the intensities of the outer, low-intensity sidebands, whose quantification becomes more difficult for slower MAS frequencies. We also considered the effect of 19F-19F homonuclear couplings on the spinning sideband intensities for the 5F-DL-Trp, 5F-L-Trp·H2O, and 6F-DL-Trp crystalline samples whose structures we solved (Table 2). For 5F-DL-Trp and 5F-L-Trp·H2O, the effects are negligible. For 6F-DL-Trp the effects were small, but discernable, in the absence of 1H decoupling, and need to be considered when CST parameters are extracted from the spectra. Overall, the CSTs for 5F-L/DL and 6F-L/DL tryptophan determined here are in good agreement with the published values,38, 40 within experimental uncertainty.
Table 2.
Compound | Closest F-F distance (Å) | F-F dipolar coupling (Hz) | δ11 (ppm) |
δ22 (ppm) |
δ33 (ppm) |
δσ (ppm) |
η |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5F-DL-Trp (L-form) | 4.5 | −1179.0 | −1.6±0.2 | −67.2±0.1 | −78.5±0.1 | 47.5±0.2 | 0.2±0.0 |
- | −1.7±0.2 | −67.4±0.1 | −78.2±0.1 | 47.4±0.2 | 0.2±0.0 | ||
5F-L-Trp·H2O | 4.6 | −1082.4 | 6.9±0.1 | −60.0±0.1 | −87.1±0.1 | 53.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 |
- | 6.9±0.1 | −60.0±0.1 | −87.0±0.1 | 53.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | ||
6F-DL-Trp | 2.9 | −4134.8 | 11.8±0.3 | −45.1±0.2 | −96.6±0.2 | 55.1±0.3 | 0.9±0.0 |
10.8±0.1 | −45.2±0.1 | −95.6±0.1 | 54.2±0.1 | 0.9±0.0 |
Experimental chemical shift tensor components and F-F homonuclear dipolar coupling contributions were extracted using SIMPSON. 19F MAS NMR simulations for the 19F crystals were carried out at 14.1 T ( 19F Larmor frequency of 564.278 MHz) and a MAS frequency of 11 kHz. 19F MAS NMR simulations for the clusters generated from 19F- substituted on non-F Tryptophan crystals were carried out at 9.4 T (376.476 MHz 19F Larmor frequency) and a MAS frequency of 7 kHz.
Density functional theory calculations of 19F chemical shift tensors of fluorosubstituted tryptophans
Recent studies indicate that in the DFT calculations of 19F chemical shifts in solids, using the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) program with the PBE0 functional,41 a 50% HartreeFock (HF) exchange admixture term, and an all-electron Slater-type (TZ2P) basis set yields values in reasonable agreement with experiment, if the molecular clusters reflect the overall symmetry of the crystal lattice.26–27 As revealed by the XRD patterns (Figure S3 of the Supporting Information), the crystal forms of the powdered fluorosubstituted tryptophans are not the same as the reported X-ray structures of the parent L-tryptophan,42 DL-tryptophan43 or 5F-DL-tryptophan39 in the Cambridge crystallographic data base. We therefore restricted our chemical shift calculations to 5F-L-Trp, 5F-L-Trp·H2O, and 6F-DL-Trp crystals, whose structures we solved.
Four molecule clusters were constructed, using the crystal coordinates. The molecular geometries of these clusters are shown in Figure 4(A-C), and the results of the chemical shift calculations are summarized in Figure 4D and Table 1. Gratifyingly, the calculated tensors are in reasonable overall agreement with the experimental values with a slope of 1.12 for the correlation between experimental and calculated chemical shift tensor components. Given that we restricted our calculations to the 5F- and 6F-substituted tryptophans for which crystal structures were solved, the chemical shift range is too small (5.8 and 6.9 ppm for the isotropic shift and reduced anisotropy, respectively) to conduct rigorous analyses with respect to the quality of the calculations. Nevertheless, the slope of 1.12 for the principal components of the CST in the four-molecule clusters suggests that these models do not fully capture the long-range electrostatic effects on the magnetic shielding. This is in line with previous studies,26–27 and a result of the fact that fluorine magnetic shieldings are dominated by long-range electrostatic contributions. Future studies will be conducted on larger molecular cluster models (15–17 molecules; 400–500 atoms) and on 4F- and 7F-substituted crystalline tryptophans of known structures.
It should also be noted, that periodic structure calculations do not yield better agreement with experiment, and large cluster calculations using appropriately constructed symmetryadapted molecular clusters and high level of theory appear to be necessary, as we have demonstrated previously for fluorine in a wide variety of environments.27
DISCUSSION
Solid state 19F NMR chemical shift parameters were determined for a series of crystalline tryptophans containing fluorine at the 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7- positions. The isotropic and anisotropic components of the CSTs in these molecules are very sensitive to the positioning of the fluorine atom in the indole ring, thereby making fluorotryptophans excellent 19F NMR probes in protein studies, as has been previously shown for solution NMR studies.5, 10 One important result of the current work is the demonstration that the 19F lines are narrow at a MAS frequency of 60 kHz, diminishing the need for 1H decoupling. This observation holds true for proteins as well, making 19F MAS NMR investigations on a broad range of large biological molecules and assemblies practical and accessible to many laboratories. Although we currently do not have access to 19F ‘ultrafast’ MAS probes (frequencies of 100–110 kHz), it is possible to extrapolate our findings to MAS frequencies above 100 kHz, where, similar to the 1H ultrafast MAS NMR studies of organic molecules and proteins,44–45 further line narrowing and sensitivity gains are expected.
In addition to our experimental studies by MAS NMR spectroscopy, we also performed DFT calculations of chemical shift tensors in fluorosubstituted tryptophan crystals with known structures. This investigation was prompted by the paucity of literature on quantum chemical calculations of 19F NMR parameters, both for organic and biological systems. Our findings demonstrate that density functional theory can be used successfully for the calculation of 19F CSA parameters, provided a high percentage (50%) of the HF exchange term is used in the functional and the wavefunction is expanded in a basis of Slater-type atomic orbitals. Future investigations for improving the accuracy of these calculations will focus on large molecular clusters that reflect the overall crystal symmetry and capture long-range electrostatic effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Our integrated experimental 19F MAS NMR and computational DFT study of fluorosubstituted tryptophans permitted a thorough evaluation of the influence of the local environment on the 19F chemical shift tensor and demonstrated the advantages of fast-MAS (60 kHz or greater) experiments for studying 19F-containing solid biological materials. The approach presented here is broadly applicable for characterization of other organic solids by 19F MAS NMR spectroscopy and holds particular promise for studies employing fluorosubstituted tryptophans in proteins and protein assemblies.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
MAS NMR spectra of fluorosubstituted tryptophans at several magnetic fields and MAS frequencies; powder XRD patterns; MAS frequency and magnetic field dependence of the sensitivity of the 19F MAS NMR experiments; summary of experimental CSA parameters at various field strengths; for recrystallized 5F-DL-Trp, 5F-L-Trp·H2O, and 6F-DL-Trp – i) X-ray structure determination protocols; ii) crystal data and structure refinement parameters; iii) atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters; iv) bond lengths and bond angles; v) anisotropic displacement parameters; vi) hydrogen coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters. This information can be found on the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Professor Eric Bloch for the use of the powder XRD instrumentation. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant CHE-1708773 to AMG and TP) and by the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS and NIAID, Grant P50 GM082251, Technology Development Project on MAS NMR). We acknowledge the National Science Foundation (NSF grant CHE-0959496) for the acquisition of the 850 MHz NMR spectrometer at the University of Delaware and the National Institutes of Health (NIH Grants P30GM103519 and P30GM110758) for the support of core instrumentation infrastructure at the University of Delaware.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gakh YG; Gakh AA; Gronenborn AM, Fluorine as an NMR Probe for Structural Studies of Chemical and Biological Systems. Magn. Reson. Chem 2000, 38, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharaf NG; Ishima R; Gronenborn AM, Conformational Plasticity of the NNRTIBinding Pocket in HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase: A Fluorine Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 3864–3873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campos-Olivas R; Aziz R; Helms GL; Evans JNS; Gronenborn AM, Placement of 19F into the Center of GB1: Effects on Structure and Stability. FEBS Lett. 2002, 517, 5560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matei E; Andre S; Glinschert A; Infantino AS; Oscarson S; Gabius HJ; Gronenborn AM, Fluorinated Carbohydrates as Lectin Ligands: Dissecting Glycan-Cyanovirin Interactions by Using F-19 NMR Spectroscopy. Chem.-Eur. J 2013, 19, 5364–5374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matei E; Gronenborn AM, F-19 Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement: AValuable Tool for Distance Measurements in Proteins. Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit 2016, 55, 150–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Carugo O, Amino Acid Composition and Protein Dimension. Protein Sci 2008, 17, 2187–2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gaur RK, Amino Acid Frequency Distribution among Eurkaryotic Proteins. IIOAB J. 2014, 5, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clore GM; Gronenborn AM; Birdsall B; Feeney J; Roberts GCK, 19F-NMR Studies of 3′,5′-Difluoromethotrexate Binding to Lactobacillus casei Dihydrofolate Reductase - Molecular Motion and Coenzyme-Induced Conformational Changes. Biochem. J 1984, 217, 659–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crowley PB; Kyne C; Monteith WB, Simple and Inexpensive Incorporation of 19F-Tryptophan for Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 10681–10683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharaf NG; Gronenborn AM, 19F-Modified Proteins and 19F-Containing Ligands as Tools in Solution NMR Studies of Protein Interactions In Isotope Labeling of Biomolecules - Labeling Methods, Kelman Z, Ed. Elsevier Academic Press Inc: San Diego, 2015; Vol. 565, pp 67–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kitevski-LeBlanc JL; Prosser RS, Current Applications of 19F NMR to Studies of Protein Structure and Dynamics. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc 2012, 62, 1–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Judge PJ; Watts A, Recent contributions from solid-state NMR to the understanding of membrane protein structure and function. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol 2011, 15, 690–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Didenko T; Liu JJ; Horst R; Stevens RC; Wuthrich K, Fluorine-19 NMR of Integral Membrane Proteins Illustrated with Studies of GPCRs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol 2013, 23, 740–747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prosser RS; Luchette PA; Westerman PW, Using O-2 to Probe Membrane Immersion Depth by 19F NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2000, 97, 9967–9971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koch K; Afonin S; Ieronimo M; Berditsch M; Ulrich AS, Solid-State 19F NMR of Peptides in Native Membranes In Solid State Nmr, Chan JCC, Ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin: Berlin, 2012; Vol. 306, pp 89–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wadhwani P; Strandberg E; Heidenreich N; Burck J; Fanghanel S; Ulrich AS, SelfAssembly of Flexible Beta-Strands into Immobile Amyloid-Like beta-Sheets in Membranes As Revealed by Solid-State 19F NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 6512–6515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Buffy JJ; Waring AJ; Hong M, Determination of Peptide Oligomerization in Lipid Bilayers Using 19F Spin Diffusion NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 4477–4483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Luo WB; Mani R; Hong M, Side-chain Conformation of the M2 Transmembrane Peptide Proton Channel of Influenza A Virus from 19F Solid-State NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 10825–10832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Su YC; DeGrado WF; Hong M, Orientation, Dynamics, and Lipid Interaction of an Antimicrobial Arylamide Investigated by 19F and 31P Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 9197–9205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hong M; Schmidt-Rohr K, Magic-Angle-Spinning NMR Techniques for Measuring LongRange Distances in Biological Macromolecules. Acc. Chem. Res 2013, 46, 2154–2163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hellmich UA; Pfleger N; Glaubitz C, 19F MAS NMR on Proteorhodopsin: Enhanced Protocol for Site-Specific Labeling for General Application to Membrane Proteins. Photochem. Photobiol 2009, 85, 535–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harding ME; Lenhart M; Auer AA; Gauss J, Quantitative Prediction of Gas-Phase 19F Nuclear Magnetic Shielding Constants. J. Chem. Phys 2008, 128, 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanders LK; Oldfield E, Theoretical Investigation of 19F NMR Chemical Shielding Tensors in Fluorobenzenes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8098–8104. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Elavarasi SB; Dorai K, Characterization of the 19F Chemical Shielding Tensor Using Cross-Correlated Spin Relaxation Measurements and Quantum Chemical Calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett 2010, 489, 248–253. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Isley WC; Urick AK; Pomerantz WCK; Cramer CJ, Prediction of 19F NMR Chemical Shifts in Labeled Proteins: Computational Protocol and Case Study. Mol. Pharm 2016, 13, 2376–2386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holmes ST; Iuliucci RJ; Mueller KT; Dybowski C, Critical Analysis of Cluster Models and Exchange-Correlation Functionals for Calculating Magnetic Shielding in Molecular Solids. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2015, 11, 5229–5241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alkan F; Holmes ST; Dybowski C, Role of Exact Exchange and Relativistic Approximations in Calculating 19F Magnetic Shielding in Solids Using a Cluster Ansatz. J Chem Theory Comput 2017, 13, 4741–4752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roos M; Wang T; Shcherbakov AA; Hong M, Fast Magic-Angle-Spinning 19F Spin Exchange NMR for Determining Nanometer 19F-19F Distances in Proteins and Pharmaceutical Compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 2900–2911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bennett AE; Rienstra CM; Auger M; Lakshmi KV; Griffin RG, Heteronuclear Decoupling in Rotating Solids. J. Chem. Phys 1995, 103, 6951–6958. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herzfeld J; Berger AE, Sideband intensities in NMR spectra of samples spinning at the magic angle. J. Chem. Phys 1980, 73, 6021–6030. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eichele K HBA, 1.7.5; Universität Tübingen, 2015.
- 32.Frisch MJ; Trucks GW; Schlegel HB; Scuseria GE; Robb MA; Cheeseman JR; Scalmani G; Barone V; Mennucci B; Petersson GA, et al. , Gaussian 09, Revision B.01. In Gaussian 09, Revision B.01, Wallingford CT, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 33.te Velde G; Bickelhaupt FM; Baerends EJ; Fonseca Guerra C; van Gisbergen SJA; Snijders JG; Ziegler T, Chemistry with ADF. J. Comp. Chem 2001, 22, 931–967. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baias M; Dumez JN; Svensson PH; Schantz S; Day GM; Emsley L, De Novo Determination of the Crystal Structure of a Large Drug Molecule by Crystal Structure Prediction-Based Powder NMR Crystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 17501–17507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bak M; Schultz R; Vosegaard T; Nielsen NC, Specification and Visualization of Anisotropic Interaction Tensors in Polypeptides and Numerical Simulations in Biological Solid-State NMR. J. Magn. Reson 2002, 154, 28–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bak M; Rasmussen JT; Nielsen NC, SIMPSON: A General Simulation Program for Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson 2011, 213, 366–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Delaglio F; Grzesiek S; Vuister GW; Zhu G; Pfeifer J; Bax A, NMRPipe: A Multidimensional Spectral Processing System Based on UNIX Pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 6, 277–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dürr UH; Grage SL; Witter R; Ulrich AS, Solid-State 19F NMR Parameters of Fluorine-Labeled Amino Acids. Part I: Aromatic Substituents. J. Magn. Reson 2008, 191, 7–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao X; DeVries JS; McDonald R; Sykes BD, Determination of the 19F NMR Chemical Shielding Tensor and Crystal Structure of 5-Fluoro-DL-Tryptophan. J. Magn. Reson 2007, 187, 88–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhao GP; Perilla JR; Yufenyuy EL; Meng X; Chen B; Ning JY; Ahn J; Gronenborn AM; Schulten K; Aiken C, et al. , Mature HIV-1 Capsid Structure by CryoElectron Microscopy and All-Atom Molecular Dynamics. Nature 2013, 497, 643–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adamo C; Barone V, Toward Reliable Density Functional Methods Without Adjustable Parameters: The PBE0 Model. J. Chem. Phys 1999, 110, 6158–6170. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gorbitz CH; Tornroos KW; Day GM, Single-Crystal Investigation of L-Tryptophan with Z’ = 16. Acta Cryst. B 2012, 68, 549–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hübschle CB; Messerschmidt M; Luger P, Crystal Structure of DLTryptophan at 173 K. Cryst. Res. Techn 2004, 39, 274–278. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Andreas LB; Le Marchand T; Jaudzems K; Pintacuda G, High-Resolution ProtonDetected NMR of Proteins at Very Fast MAS. J. Magn. Reson 2015, 253, 36–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Struppe J; Quinn CM; Lu M; Wang M; Hou G; Lu X; Kraus J; Andreas LB; Stanek J; Lalli D, et al. , Expanding the Horizons for Structural Analysis of Fully Protonated Protein Assemblies by NMR Spectroscopy at MAS Frequencies Above 100 kHz. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson 2017, 87, 117–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.