Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e1507401. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2018.1507401

Tracing the role of plant proteins in the response to metal toxicity: a comprehensive review

Shruti Jain a, Sowbiya Muneer b,c, Gea Guerriero d, Shiliang Liu e, Kanchan Vishwakarma a, Devendra Kumar Chauhan f, Nawal Kishore Dubey g, Durgesh Kumar Tripathi a,h,, Shivesh Sharma a
PMCID: PMC6204846  PMID: 30188762

ABSTRACT

Plants are sessile in nature, but are capable to evade from high level concentration of heavy metals like Cd, Hg, Cu, through various metabolic pathways. Some of the pathways regulate normal metabolism in plants, whereas others are required for for their survival under metal toxicity. Different plant proteins act as transporters to transfer metal from one organelle to the other and further eliminate it out from the plants. Initially, exposure of heavy metals/metalloids to plants lead to over expression of proteins which in turn stimulate other stress-related genes. Further, they activate signalling mechanism like MAPK cascade, Cd-Calmodulin signalling pathway, and oxidation signalling pathway that lead to generation of ROS (reactive oxygen species). Once these ROS (highly unstable) are formed, they generate free radicals which react with macromolecules like proteins and DNA. This has negative impact on plant growth and leads to ageing and, eventually, cell death. The uncontrolled, destructive processes damage plants physiologically and ultimately lead to oxidative stress. Activation of antioxidant enzymes like SOD (superoxide dismutase) and CAT (catalase) allows plants to cope under oxidative stress conditions. Among plant proteins, some of the antioxidant enzymes like glutathione, and APX (ascorbate peroxidase) play defensive roles against abiotic stress in plants. Chaperones help in protein folding to maintain protein stability under stress conditions. With this background, the present review gives a brief account of the functions, localization and expression pattern of plant proteins against metal/metalloid toxicity. Moreover, the aim of this review is also to summarize the cutting edge research of plant protein and metal interfaces and their future prospects.

Keywords: plant proteins, metal toxicity, signal transduction, transporters, chaperones, oxidative stress

Introduction

Metals occur naturally in the earth’s crust at different depths. These metals are classified on the basis of their density. Heavy metals are generally defined as metals with relatively high density; for example, zinc, copper, lead, iron, etc. Light metals have low density and include magnesium, aluminium and titanium. Another division is metalloids which include germanium, arsenic, selenium etc. Heavy metals occur in the d-block of the periodic table.1 During the process of evolution of angiosperms, only 19 elements such as Mg, C, P, H, S, K, N, O and Ca (macronutrients) and Cu, Mn, Fe, B, Zn, Mo, Co, Ni, and Cl (micronutrients) were selected for basic metabolism.2 In addition, Si is also a beneficial element, and it was reported to be involved in the maintenance of the cell wall structure in some plants.3 Macro- and micronutrients play an important role in both biochemical and physiological processes of plants.

However, the problem comes during their excess discharge into the environment due to various human activities and natural phenomena. According to statistics, it was estimated that around 147000 tonnes of copper and 38900 tonnes of cadmium are discharged annually and liberated out of industries to the environment.4 Due to the non-degradable nature of the metals, they are being transferred from one trophic level to the other, through the food chains, further leading to bio-magnification. Due to the presence of metals in the soil, these plants cannot grow optimally and their photosynthetic functions are dramatically affected. Most of the plants cannot grow efficiently in soil and water contaminated with metals. Eventually, some plants have evolved specific molecular and physiological processes to withstand metal stress.5 Different studies at the gene and protein levels have identified mechanisms regulating metal tolerance.6 Some of the essential entities to identify correct protein functions are protein folding and protein-protein interactions.7 Hence, studies using proteomics offer an unprecedented analytical depth for the identification and characterization of the array of proteins which control metal detoxification, and for the study of pathways involving networks of proteins.8 Further, functional studies carried out on these plant proteins are equally important to decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying plant metal-tolerance. Additionally, such studies merging proteomics and functional studies can inspire biotechnological strategies which will help in bioremediation.

Plant proteins regulating the plant response to metal stress

As plants are static, they cannot escape from unfavourable environmental conditions. The exposure of plants to these toxic metals triggers various biochemical and physiological processes, which eventually lead to adaptation and ability to survive under adverse conditions.9 Different mechanisms are involved in the plant response to abiotic stresses like heavy metal toxicity (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Different mechanisms involved in plants in response to heavy metal toxicity (modified from Maksymiec [9]).

These include:

  1. Signal transduction in response to metals

  2. Entry of metal ions from the soil into the root

  3. Movement of metals from the root to the shoot

  4. Metals chelated in the cytoplasm

  5. Distribution of metal ions to other cell organelles

  6. Increased abundance of other types of proteins under metal toxicity

  1. Signal transduction in response to metals

It is difficult to detect all the changes, even subtle, in signal transduction after metal exposure in the different plant tissues and organs. Eventually, the early response like gene expression and eventual changes in protein abundances, as well as oxidative stress and production of metabolites can be useful in thorough understanding of signalling pathway.10,11 Plants have innate capability to respond to the metal stress by complex networks. In order to grow healthy in metal toxic environments, the plant initially synthesize some proteins and molecules/metabolites which then induce the expression of particular genes.9 It has been reported that abundant proteins involved in energy, disease and defense-related functions are differentially regulated in response to cadmium stress in sunflower.12 Further, in some cases, metal stress affects the proteins linked with nutrient metabolism with an increase in proteins associated with transcription and translational regulation, antioxidant pathways, molecular chaperones and biosynthetic metabolism.13,14

The different networks involved are: Ca-Calmodulin system, hormonal synthesis, ROS signalling and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) which further stimulates the genes associated with metal toxicity. These networks are activated according to the specific type of metal toxicity.15 Hereafter is a comprehensive summary of the pathways stimulated under abiotic stress.

  1. The Ca-calmodulin system

Calcium ions are secreted under abiotic stress conditions like metal toxicity, high oxidative conditions, high or low temperature conditions and low oxygen.16 Metal accumulation in plants leads to inward movement of Ca2+ ions through calcium channels. Subsequently, the calcium ions which have been transported inside the plants bind with the calmodulin protein. This process generate signals which further control the activation of genes associated with detoxification of these metals.17 Large amounts of calcium ions are detected in plants under cadmium toxicity which help in metabolism and tolerance under these stress conditions.18 This pathway is also activated under other types of metal stress conditions like lead and nickel toxicities. For instance, over expression of the NtCBP4 gene in tobacco plant allows growth under high concentrations of nickel ions, whereas it prevents growth in lead-contaminated soil.19

  • b. Hormones in the Metal Response

These are chemical messengers released by plants for many growth and metabolic activities. They allow plants to efficiently withstand metal toxicity.20 Various types of phytohormones are synthesized in response to different types of metals. Ethylene is released in plants grown in soil with high levels of zinc, copper, and iron.9 Furthermore, copper and cadmium toxic levels lead to the production of ethylene by activation of the ACC synthase gene.21 Some other hormones, like jasmonic acid, are synthesised, for example in Phaseolus coccineus,22 under toxic levels of cadmium and copper ions.

  • c. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Cascade

The proteins responsible for cascade reactions transducing the external signal to the cell’s interior are stimulated under abiotic stress conditions. During metal stress conditions, these messengers like some of the protein kinases23 enable production of chemical messengers. The kinase are MAPK kinase (MAPKKK), MAPK kinase (MAPKK) and MAPK, which are activated by phosphorylation. Arabidopsis contains over 60 MAPKKK, 10 MAPKK, and 20 MAPK.24 The rapid activation of multiple MAPKs, including MAPK3, 4, and 6, has long been observed in plants in response to biotic as well as abiotic stimuli and in response to growth and developmental signals.24 As these kinases are phosphorylated, they further phosphorylate other proteins which in their turn get activated to perform different processes. MAPK cascades also exert positive feedback regulation on ROS production. A cascade OXI1-MPK6 activated by ROS also positively regulates ROS production.25,26 Some proteins of MAPK are stimulated under Cu or Cd toxicity.27 This signalling process stimulates other genes which are responsible for translation of metal transporters and removal of toxic metals by degrading them. However, studies in response to other metals like lead, zinc, iron are very few.26

  • d. ROS Signalling

The major drawback of high deposition of toxic metals is the generation of free radicals or reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to a cascade of reactions favouring the ageing process in plants. Some signalling molecules are generated during this cascade process.28,29 The deposition of free radicals in plants depends on the ratio between their rate of generation and removal. ROS generation also depends on other plant developmental conditions like pH, temperature, and properties of soil. Due to the presence of free radicals in plants, less carbon dioxide fixation takes place in chloroplasts and a dysfunction and over-reduction in the electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria30 are triggered. Consequently, electron leakage takes place, which enhances ROS production by reducing molecular oxygen to superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide is also produced as a signalling molecule during oxidation in peroxisomes.30

ROS are synthesised by heavy metals directly by the Fenton and Haber–Weiss reactions, or indirectly by inhibiting the activity of antioxidants.31 An excessive amount of peroxide is produced under heavy metal toxicity by copper and cadmium in Arabidopsis,32 exposure to mercury in Lycopersicum escluentum33 and high levels of manganese in Hordeum vulgare.33 ROS are unstable species which undergo continuous reactions to form more free radicals.34 Free radicals interact with other biomolecules like proteins and DNA, leading to negative changes collectively known as “oxidative stress”.35-37

These reactive oxygen species also have positive effects in plants, as they regulate cell growth and development, closing and opening of stomata,38 when efficiently controlled by antioxidants. As reported, free radicals produced by NADPH oxidases under stress enable production of signals for adaptation and protection against oxidation.39-42 Hence, the outcome of free radical production depends on the end products of various reactions which include stimulation of the antioxidant system.32 Plants respond to oxidative stress conditions by enhancing antioxidant enzymes like SOD, CAT, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione S-transferase (GST), as well as molecules like proline and glutathione.35-37,43 Glutathione acts as cofactor for antioxidant enzymes which help in the removal of free radicals and allow plants to grow under adverse conditions.36,37 These antioxidants maintain the ratio of ROS in plants and help to escape oxidative stress. Hence, they contribute to the regulation of genes associated with the response to heavy metal stress.44 In Arabidopsis, Mittler et al30 have discussed that ROS like H2O2 and O2- act as signalling molecule requiring a wide gene network consisting of around 152 genes. Further, there are certain essential components involved in ROS signalling in Arabidopsis such as receptor proteins, redox-sensitive transcription factors, as well as ROS-induced inhibition of protein phosphatases. A chloroplast nucleus retrograde signalling is activated under ROS generation. A well studied pathway is for example Mg-Protoporphyrin IX (Mg-PPIX).45 This Mg PPIX pathway in Arabidopsis has revealed that around 35% of the identified proteins including glutathione S-transferases (AtGST10, AtGSTT1 and AtGSTF3) and peroxidases (ATP15, APX1, PER22 and ATP3) are involved in a variety of stress responses.46 Moreover, a number of studies proposed a close relationship between ROS and G proteins in plant signalling under abiotic stress conditions.47 However, in depth studies are still required to unravel the role of G proteins and their signalling in stressed plants.

  • (2) Entry of metal ions from the soil into the root

Root exudation and the presence of some microbes in the vicinity of the rhizosphere allow movement of metal ions from soil.48 Many mechanisms are involved in the transfer of these toxic metals across the cell membrane in roots. Different transporters which are substrate specific are used to transport toxic metals.

  1. Movement of ions from soil to root secretions and roots’ outer coating

Root secretions are released in the soil and act as protective agents against toxic metals.49 These secretions have the property to chelate metal ions and stop their entry inside the root hairs. For example, the entry of nickel ions into plants from soil is prevented, roots release some nickel-chelating histidine and citrate which do not allow its movement.50 Some heavy metals, like zinc and copper, are bound to the cell wall, which actively partakes in the regulation of ion movement inside the plants.51 The cell wall of plants (and more precisely, cell wall polysaccharides, like pectins) is not only a site for the adsorption of heavy metals (like Cd)52 but also a structure responding to heavy metal stress. Cell wall receptors (like the wall-associated kinases, WAKs) sense the status of the cell (as for example perturbations due to exogenous stresses) and can transduce the signal to the cell’s interior via a cytoplasmic kinase domain.53 These receptors create a continuum between cell wall and membrane and respond to changes in turgor pressure, a parameter that is affected upon metal stress. The presence of sites of attachment of ions on the root surface allows interchange between ions which helps in efflux and movement into the apoplast.54 The presence of pectic and histidyl groups of the cell wall and sugar molecules, like mucilage, as well as amorphous linear polysaccharides, like callose, regulate the movement of toxic ions and restrict entry of toxic ions into the plant cell. Various genotypes of tobacco having difference in the chemical composition of root cell walls can restrict entry of toxic manganese ions into the plants.55 Hence, the intrinsic properties of the cell wall control the entry of metal ions into plants. But cell walls have limited number of heavy metal binding sites.56 For example, Silene vulgaris has the property of absorbing a large amount of metals attributed to the presence of proteins or bound as silicates in the epidermis.57

  • b. Movement of ions across cell membrane

Plants have different types of membrane transporter proteins which help in metal absorption of toxic ions and metabolic processes. These proteins are responsible for transport of metal ions and stabilize the concentration of toxic metals under abiotic stress. These transporter proteins include the heavy metal ATPase transporter protein, the NRAMP, the CDF (cation diffusion facilitator),58 and the ZIP families.59 Some of the specific functions and properties of these transporter proteins are still under investigation. These transporters have been studied in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants58,59 for metal ion transport (Figure 2).

  1. The ZIP Family

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Different transporter proteins involved in heavy metal ion translocation in plants (modified from Williams et al. [58]; Guerinot [59]).

These transporter proteins perform a chief role in metal ion movement in plants. They are present in most plants, microbes and animals and are responsible for the transport of ions across the plasma membrane. Some of the ZIP transporter proteins are involved in the transport of iron and zinc in roots and shoots of A. thaliana under metal toxicity. The function of A. thaliana IRT (iron regulated transporter) was validated by S. cerevisiae fet3fet4 double mutant showing poor Fe2+ ions transport.60 In Arabidopsis, the protein shows significant expression under iron deficiency conditions and allows the entry of Fe2+ from soil.61 In A. thaliana, IRT1 is expressed in root cells and accumulates in response to iron deficiency, suggesting a role in Fe2+ uptake from the soil.61 Although expressed during iron deficiency, it was reported in yeast that AtIRT1 also helps in zinc, cadmium and manganese ion translocation.62 It additionally plays a role in the response to heavy metals, like cadmium and zinc63 and is responsible for nickel uptake and transfer from the soil.64 S. cerevisiae zinc transporters ZRT1 and ZRT2 show sequence similarity to IRT1 and could efficiently transport zinc.65,66 Double mutant of zrt1 and zrt2 in yeast helped in the functional analysis of AtZIP1, AtZIP2 and AtZIP3 transporters.67 Furthermore, these proteins are produced under zinc ion deficiency conditions and help in its absorption.

  • (ii) The NRAMP Family

These transporters are used to transfer different ions, like iron, nickel, manganese, zinc, copper in different kingdoms.68 The plant proteins help in the transfer of toxic metal ions from the roots and shoots across cell membrane and vacuolar membrane.69 In the case of Arabidopsis, it helps in the transfer of iron and cadmium, where NRAMP1 protein maintains its metabolic level.70 These transporter proteins are highly unregulated during iron deficiency in plants and hence help in Fe uptake. Molecular studies revealed that IRT1 helps in the initial movement of iron from the soil to the roots (in non-graminaceous monocots and in dicots)61 and that the other YS1 transporter allows initial movement of siderophore–Fe complexes in graminaceous monocots.71 The similarity in NRAMP genes in the graminaceous and dicots species points to the same function of NRAMP proteins in maintaining iron metabolism in plants.72-74

  • (iii) The copper transporters family (CTR)

These transporter proteins were first identified in mammalian and yeast cells and then in plants.75 They are associated with the transport of Cu2+ from the soil. The CTR proteins are made up of metal binding sites and trans membrane domains. As reported in Arabidopsis, COTP1 is responsible for Cu2+ uptake and is required for development. A. thaliana copper transporter COPT1 was identified by functional complementation of the S. cerevisiae mutant ctr1-3, which is defective in copper uptake.75 In A. thaliana, COPT1 has been shown to transport copper, and it also has a role in growth and pollen development.76

  • c. Slow movement and removal of metal ions from the cell

The cell membrane in plants controls the rate of metal intake and with the help of specific proteins, it enhances the removal of toxic ions by eliminating them from the cell.73,77,78 The As-resistant plant Holcus lanatus does not absorb much As with respect to non-resistant types and this is due to the presence of phytochelatins which form complexes with As.72 The enhanced removal of toxic ions prevents the entry and translocation into the different plant organs and tissues, as already reported in bacteria 79 and animal cells.80

  • (3) Movement of metals from the root to the shoot

Metals are transported from the roots to the aerial part via conductive tissues in the form of metal conjugates. For the removal of iron and nickel, major organic acids form the complexes.81 Some of the derived substances from methionine are used for transportation of copper ions.82 Some chelating agents like histidine are involved in the movement of nickel ions. Transporter proteins help in the translocation of toxic metals from the root to the stem.

  1. The HMA Family of Transporters

These are ATPases grouped according to their metal-substrate selectivity for copper/silver and zinc/cadmium/lead/cobalt groups.83 Arabidopsis HMA4 (belonging to the Zn/Cd//Pb/Co group) is involved in zinc loading in the xylem, as well as cadmium translocation, together with AtHMA2.83 AtHMA5 is required in copper removal and transportation from the roots to the shoot.84

  • b. The MATE Family of Efflux Proteins

MATE Family of efflux proteins are required in the elimination of various drugs and harmful substances from plants. For example, FRD3 is a protein involved in the removal of iron via the formation of Fe – citrate complexes in xylem in roots. The iron complexes formed help in the translocation of iron to the leaves through the vessels.85

  • c. The Oligopeptide Transporters Family (OPT)

These are transporters which include YSL protein for iron transport in plants in the form of conjugates.71 Zea mays Yellow stripe 1 protein (ZmYS1) is involved in the transport of chelated forms of iron, copper, nickel by methionine derivatives.86 The OPT proteins include a particular type of YSL subfamily which is present in plants. The protein AtYSL2 present in cell membrane is required for translocation of toxic ions along stems via the xylem and phloem.87,88 The synthesis of this protein is altered by the presence of copper and iron.87

  • (4) Metals chelated in the cytoplasm

Some of the chemicals are not dissolved immediately; therefore, their concentration increases in the plant cell. Plants produce phytochelatins and metallothioneins which bind these metals and sequester them to stable forms.

  1. Phytochelatins

Phytochelatins (PCs) are widely studied toxic metal chelating proteins which bind and compartmentalize heavy metals.89 The metal binds to form a structure as (c-Glu-Cys)nGly (n = 2–11) (Figure 3).89 Phytochelatins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and translocated as conjugates to the particular cell compartment. Their production is enhanced under heavy metal toxicity of silver, gold, zinc, lead and copper ions.89,90 PCs are activated in brown mustard during cadmium contamination and enable photosynthesis to take place; however, the leaf size and transpiration rate are decreased.91 It is seen that cadmium ion tolerance in different mutants of Arabidopsis is associated with the capability to activate phytochelatins.92 Heavy metal contamination with copper and cadmium can be correlated with the production of glutamate synthase which further stimulates phytochelatins.93 Arabidopsis cadmium-sensitive mutants (where CAD1 is responsible for phytochelatin synthesis) produced glutathione but are incapable of synthesizing phytochelatins and consequently were sensitive to cadmium ions.92

  • b. Metallothioneins and Ferritins

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phytochelatins activate an important mechanism responsible for Cd2+ tolerance (modified from Clemens [134]). HMW-High molecular weight, LMW- Low molecular weight, PCS- Phytochelatin synthatase, PC-Phytochelatins.

Metallothioneins (MTs) are low molecular weight proteins containing large amounts of cysteine and bind to metals. Different classes of MTs are present: class 1 MTs shows similarity with horse liver MT, class 2 has no clear similarity to horse liver MT94 and class III comprises phytochelatins and Cys-rich peptides of enzymatic origin. In plants, metallothioneins are activated under different abiotic stress conditions and also during growth.95 Ferritins are widespread proteins having the ability to store huge amounts of Fe2+ and Fe3+and releasing them in a controlled manner.96 Plant ferritins have the property to store only iron but, in animals, these proteins can store other metals like cadmium, zinc, aluminium and copper atoms.97 These plant proteins are produced under various abiotic stresses like metal toxicity by Fe.98,99 This gene in plants is controlled by abscisic acid and antioxidants.100 Hence, the protein acts as a protective element for plants by preventing continuous reactions of free radicals stimulated by Fe ions.101

  • (5) Distribution of metal ions to other cell organelles

After high accumulation of metal ions in the cytoplasm, they are further transported to other cell organelles in order to remove them from plant cells. During the process, these plants use protein as transporters to transfer the metal ions (Figure 2). The plant proteins are:-

  1. ATPase transporters:

The CPx-type ATPases help in the movement of toxic metals like copper, lead, cadmium across the plasma membrane by using energy in the form of ATPP1B-type. ATPases also perform the same function of transporting toxic metals from the roots to the organelles. They control plant metabolism to eliminate toxic metal ions.102 They have been classified into two subtypes: multidrug resistance proteins (MDRs) and multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRPs). Furthermore, the first one to be cloned was the MDR-like gene in Arabidopsis, but there were few numbers of MRPs which were functionally characterized.103,104

  • b. NRAMP (Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Proteins)

NRAMP are transporters involved in the transport of toxic metals. Data on three rice NRAMPs, known as OsNramp1, OsNramp2, and OsNramp3 reported their presence in various parts and a major role in transporting metal ions.73,105 The role of NRAMP is mainly related with transport of iron and to a lesser extent, manganese.106 In thale cress, AtNRAMP1, 3, 4, and 6 encode functional plant heavy metal transporters.107 Further, over expression of AtNRAMP1 in Arabidopsis increases plant resistance to toxic Fe concentrations.74

  • c. Metal tolerance proteins (MTPs)

Cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) is responsible for the transfer of zinc, nickel, cadmium and cobalt and sequester these ions away from the cytoplasm into the vacuole. Hence, they are also known as “cation efflux transporter”72 and metal tolerance proteins (MTPs) which promote metal ions movement from the cytoplasm to the extracellular space or into organelles.108-110 Around ten MTP genes have been found in O. sativa111 and 12 in A. thaliana. The first CDF gene identified in A. thaliana was originally named Zinc Transporter 1 gene (ZAT1) and later called METAL TOLERANCE PROTEIN 1 (AtMTP1).112,113 The corresponding gene is expressed in roots as well as shoots and, when over expressed in Arabidopsis, it helps in zinc tolerance.113

  • d. ZIP transporters

ZIP transporters are referred to as ZRT, IRT-like proteins used in translocation of different ions like cadmium, zinc, iron, manganese depending on the type of substrate and their particular identity.59,72 They are involved in the transport of cadmium from the soil to roots and its further translocation from the root to the shoot.69 Some of the ZIP family transporters described in Arabidopsis are, IRT1, IRT2, and IRT3 ZIP 1–12.114 Further, detailed description of these transporters AtIRT1, AtIRT2, and AtIRT3 have been reported. Among these three transporters, AtIRT1 is mostly involved in the movement of zinc and iron in plants.60,115,116 Other transporters of the ZIP family are required for metal transportation in and out of specific organelles.114

  • e. MATE Transporters

Another class of protein family includes MATE transporters which also help in the movement of toxic metals. Studies revealed that FDR3 (Ferric reductase defective 3) was abundant in the roots of the heavy metal hyper accumulators Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis hallerit.107,115,116 Hence, metal transporters help in the transport of the metals in plants and in the removal of these toxic substances from the plants.

  • (6) Other types of proteins stimulated under metal toxicity

  1. Glutathione

Reduced glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide and has a sulfhydryl group (SH) which is required for scavenging metal from plants.117 The protein known as glutathione reductase (GR) maintains the redox potential of cells by changing the oxidised glutathione (GSSG) form to the reduced one (GSH) (Figure 4). A substantial increase in GR content was observed in Luffa seedlings due to arsenic toxicity.118 Conversion of oxidised to reduced form is dependent on NADPH.119 Glutathione helps in various plant cellular mechanisms like heavy metal detoxification,120 and scavenging radicals, thereby protecting the plants under stress conditions.121,122 It also plays a significant role in growth and development of plants, including flowering123 and cell division.124 The two processes involved in the formation of GSH require ATP during a step where γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GSH1) acts as catalysts in the chemical reaction involving peptide bond formation between -COOH groups of glutamate with -NH2 group of cysteine giving γ-glutamylcysteine (γ-EC) as a product. This step holds a central role during high production of glutathione.125 Furthermore, in the second process, glutathione synthetase (GSH2) joins a glycine amino acid with γ-EC to give GSH as end product.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Biosynthesis of Glutathione (GSH) in chloroplast and cytosol in plant cellγ-glutamylcysteine (γ-EC), γ-glutamylcysteinesynthetase (GSH1) glutathione synthetase (GSH2) E – carboxylic part of glutamate and C – amino group of cysteine, G – glycine amino acid. (modified from Xiang and Oliver [93]).

Under the condition when a heavy metal such as cadmium enters the cytoplasm, glutathione (GSH) forms a complex with the metal ion (Cd-GS2) (Figure 3). This complex has stronger affinity to PC synthase than free heavy metal ions and it functions as enzyme activator by causing the folding of the protein. Then, the heavy metal may bind with PC synthase and facilitate a conformational change for its activation as discussed in section 4.1. It was first identified by Grill et al.126 that glutathione is involved as a substrate for the synthesis of PC when PC synthase is activated by heavy metals such as Cd.126

  • b. Chaperones

The accumulation of metals in crops is a serious concern, as they can be consumed by humans and act as carcinogens127 or favour neurological disorders.128 In plants, metals like mercury, lead and cadmium may interact with proteins129,130 and DNA thereby damaging nucleic acids as well as inhibiting protein folding. Hence, these proteins become non-functional under stress conditions. To overcome these stress conditions, plants activate chaperones. Chaperones repair and protect the proteins from unfolding under metal toxicity.131-133 Most of the chaperones are heat shock proteins.

Concluding remarks and future prospects

Among the different pollutants in the environment, a major role is played by metals (heavy metals, light metals and metalloids). These metal ions are discharged through chemical and leather industries, pesticides, etc. In due course of time, the high accumulation of toxic metal ions in plants retards the growth and development and ultimately leads to death of the plant tissues. Eventually, these plants are consumed by humans, thereby causing major health concerns. Plants have innate mechanisms to tolerate toxicity by metal ions, notably via the up-regulation of some genes which provide resistance and acclimatize plants under abiotic stress conditions, via the release of inhibitors, the increase of antioxidants to scavenge free radicals, etc. Proteins involved in plant metal stress response act as initiators or precursors and continue the signalling pathway; for example, calmodulin binding to the calcium ions released under abiotic stress, catalase and superoxide dismutase act as antioxidants by lowering the levels of free radicals or ROS released under stress conditions. As described above, some of the proteins act as transporters, like ABC and NRAMP transporters, which help in the translocation of toxic metal ions like cadmium, copper, zinc and release them out from the plants. Proteins also have chelating properties, like PCs and MTs, which chelate the toxic ions by breaking down complex compounds. Some of the other types of proteins are glutathione, which maintains the redox potential of plant cell during metal toxicity. Due to the presence of toxic metal ions like Ni, Cd in plants, the proteins unfold and become non-functional. In such cases, plant chaperones facilitate the correct folding of proteins. Hence, these plant proteins hold a central role in providing protection during abiotic stress by metals.

By analysing those plant proteins involved in the tolerance under metal stress, we can devise biotechnological strategies improving the tolerance of plants to metals. Biochemical and -omics analyses can provide in-depth study which will be necessary to exploit the great potential of the stress-responsive proteins. Finally, highly tolerant plant species can be studied and some of their gene transferred to other plants, like crops, to improve their resistance against metals.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Director MNNIT Allahabad for providing necessary research facilities. The financial support provided by MHRD sponsored project “Design Innovation Centre” is also acknowledged.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Brit Med Bull. 2003;68(1):167–182. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ernst WHO. Evolution of metal tolerance in higher plants. For Snow Landsc Res. 2006;80(3):251–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Epstein E. Silicon. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1999;50(1):641–664. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gadd GM, White C. Microbial treatment of metal pollution—a working biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol. 1993;11(8):353–359. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1998;49(1):643–668. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh S, Parihar P, Singh R, Singh VP, Prasad SM. Heavy metal tolerance in plants: role of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics. Front Plant Sci. 2016;6:1143. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DalCorso G, Fasani E, Furini A. Recent advances in the analysis of metal hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance in plants using proteomics. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:280. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ahsan N, Renaut J, Komatsu S. Recent developments in the application of proteomics to the analysis of plant responses to heavy metals. Proteomics. 2009;9(10):2602–2621. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maksymiec W. Signaling responses in plants to heavy metal stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2007;29(3):177. doi: 10.1007/s11738-007-0036-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chamnongpol S, Willekens H, Langebartels C, Montagu M, Inzé D, Camp W. Transgenic tobacco with a reduced catalase activity develops necrotic lesions and induces pathogenesis‐related expression under high light. Plant J. 1996;10(3):491–503. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10030491.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, van Montagu M, van Camp W. Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J. 1997;16(16):4806–4816. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.16.4806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lopes Júnior CA, de Sousa Barbosa H, Galazzi RM, Koolen HH, Gozzo FC, Arruda MA. Evaluation of proteome alterations induced by cadmium stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)cultures. Ecotoxicol Safety. 2015;119:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Muneer S, Hakeem KR, Mohamed R, Lee JH. Cadmium toxicity induced alterations in the root proteome of green gram in contrasting response towards iron supplement. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4) :6343–6355. doi: 10.3390/ijms15046343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Toxicity of heavy metals and metal-containing nanoparticles on plants. Biochim Biophys Acta (Bba)-Proteins and Proteomics. 2016;1864(8) :932–944. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DalCorso G, Farinati S, Furini A. Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5(6):663–667. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.6.11425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knight H. Calcium signaling during abiotic stress in plants. Int Rev Cytol. 1999;195:269–324. Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62707-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang T, Poovaiah BW. Calcium/calmodulin-mediated signal network in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2003;8(10):505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Skórzyńska-Polit E, Tukendorf A, Selstam E, Baszyński T. Calcium modifies Cd effect on runner bean plants. Environ Exp Bot. 1998;40(3):275–286. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00045-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arazi T, Sunkar R, Kaplan B, Fromm HA. tobacco plasma membrane calmodulin‐binding transporter confers Ni2+ tolerance and Pb2+ hypersensitivity in transgenic plants. Plant J. 1999;20(2):171–182. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peleg Z, Blumwald E. Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(3):290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pell EJ, Schlagnhaufer CD, Arteca RN. Ozone induced oxidative stress: mechanisms of action and reaction. Physiol Plantarum. 1997;100(2):264–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb04782.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maksymiec W, Wianowska D, Dawidowicz AL, Radkiewicz S, Mardarowicz M, Krupa Z. The level of jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana and Phaseolus coccineus plants under heavy metal stress. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162(12):1338–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jonak C, Ökrész L, Bögre L, Hirt H. Complexity, cross talk and integration of plant MAP kinase signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5(5):415–424. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00285-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Zelicourt A, Colcombet J, Hirt H. The role of MAPK modules and ABA during abiotic stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(8):677–685. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Asai S, Ohta K, Yoshioka H. MAPK signaling regulates nitric oxide and NADPH oxidase dependent oxidative bursts in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1390–1406. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jalmi SK, Bhagat PK, Verma D, Noryang S, Tayyeba S, Singh K, Sharma D, Sinha AK. Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jonak C, Nakagami H, Hirt H. Heavy metal stress. Activation of distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways by copper and cadmium. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(2):3276–3283. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.045724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Finkel T. Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. J Cell Boil. 2011;194(1):7–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201102095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wood ZA, Poole LB, Karplus PA. Peroxiredoxin evolution and the regulation of hydrogen peroxide signaling. Science. 2003;300(5619):650–653. doi: 10.1126/science.1080405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(10):490–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Romero-Puertas MC, Corpas FJ, Rodríguez-Serrano M, Gómez M, Luis A, Sandalio LM. Differential expression and regulation of antioxidative enzymes by cadmium in pea plants. J Plant Physiol. 2007;164(10):1346–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maksymiec W, Krupa Z. The effects of short-term exposition to Cd, excess Cu ions and jasmonate on oxidative stress appearing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Exp Bot. 2006;57(1–2):187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cho UH, Park JO. Mercury-induced oxidative stress in tomato seedlings. Plant Sci. 2000;156(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Foyer CH, Halliwell B. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta. 1976;133(1):21–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00386001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharma SS, Dietz KJ. The relationship between metal toxicity and cellular redox imbalance. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(1):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hossain MA, Piyatida P, Da Silva JAT, Fujita M. Molecular mechanism of heavy metal toxicity and tolerance in plants: central role of glutathione in detoxification of reactive oxygen species and methylglyoxal and in heavy metal chelation. J Bot. 2012a; doi: 10.1155/2012/872875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hossain MA, Hossain MD, Rohman MM, daSilva JT, Fujita M. Onion major compounds (flavonoids, organosulfurs) and highly expressed glutathione-related enzymes: possible physiological interaction, gene cloning and abiotic stress response. NY, USA: Onion consumption and health, Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2012b. 49–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Foreman J, Demidchik V, Bothwell JH, Mylona P, Miedema H, Torres MA, Davies JM. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature. 2003;422(6930):442. doi: 10.1038/nature01485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kwak JM, Nguyen V, Schroeder JI. The role of reactive oxygen species in hormonal responses. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(2):323–329. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.079004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davletova S, Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shengqiang Z, Oliver DJ, Coutu J, Mittler R. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17(1):268–281. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miller G, Shulaev V, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress. Physiol Plant. 2008;133(3):481–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Miller GAD, Suzuki N. CIFTCI-YILMAZ SULTAN, Mittler RON. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(4):453–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Neill S, Desikan R, Hancock J. Hydrogen peroxide signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5(5):388–395. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nott A, Jung HS, Koussevitzky S, Chory J. Plastidto-nucleus retrograde signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:739–759. PMID:16669780. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R, Miller G. ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:259–270. PMID:21486305. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sewelam N, Kazan K, PM Schenk. Global plant stress signaling: reactive oxygen species at the cross-road. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:187. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wenzel WW, Bunkowski M, Puschenreiter M, Horak O. Rhizosphere characteristics of indigenously growing nickel hyperaccumulator and excluder plants on serpentine soil. Environ Pollut. 2003;123(1):131–138. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00341-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Marschner H. Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Massachusetts, United States: Academic press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Salt DE, Kato N, Kramer U, Smith RD, Raskin I The role of root exudates in nickel hyperaccumulation and tolerance in accumulator and nonaccumulator species of Thlaspi. In Terry N, Banuelos G, editors. Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers Inc.; 2000, p. 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dietz K. Functions and responses of the leaf apoplast under stress In: Progress in botany. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1997;58:221–254. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60458-4_9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Parrotta L, Guerriero G, Sergeant K, Cai G, Hausman JF. Target or barrier? The cell wall of early-and later-diverging plants vs cadmium toxicity: differences in the response mechanisms. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:133. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Humphrey TV, Bonetta DT, Goring DR. Sentinels at the wall: cell wall receptors and sensors. New Phytol. 2007;176(1):7–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Allan DL, Jarrell WM. Proton and copper adsorption to maize and soybean root cell walls. Plant Physiol. 1989;89(3):823–832. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang J, Evangelou BP, Nielsen MT. Surface chemical properties of purified root cell walls from two tobacco genotypes exhibiting different tolerance to manganese toxicity. Plant Physiol. 1992;100(1):496–501. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.1.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ernst WHO, Verkleij JAC, Schat H. Metal tolerance in plants. Acta BotanicaNeerlandica. 1992;41(3):229–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bringezu K, Lichtenberger O, Leopold I, Neumann D. Heavy metal tolerance of Silene vulgaris. J Plant Physiol. 1999;154(4):536–546. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80295-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Williams LE, Pittman JK, Hall JL. Emerging mechanisms for heavy metal transport in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta(BBA)-Biomembranes. 2000;1465(1–2):104–126. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Guerinot ML. The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1465(1–2):190–198. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eide D, Broderius M, Fett J, Guerinot ML. A novel iron-regulated metal transporter from plants identified by functional expression in yeast. PNAS. 1996;93(11):5624–5628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Vert G, Grotz N, Dédaldéchamp F, Gaymard F, Guerinot ML, Briat JF, Curie C. IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell. 2002;14(6):1223–1233. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Korshunova YO, Eide D, Clark WG, Guerinot ML, Pakrasi HB. The IRT1 protein from Arabidopsis thaliana is a metal transporter with a broad substrate range. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;40(1):37–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1026438615520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cohen CK, Fox TC, Garvin DF, Kochian LV. The role of iron-deficiency stress responses in stimulating heavy-metal transport in plants. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(3):1063–1072. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.3.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nishida S, Tsuzuki C, Kato A, Aisu A, Yoshida J, Mizuno T. AtIRT1, the primary iron uptake transporter in the root, mediates excess nickel accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(8):1433–1442. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhao H, Eide D. The yeast ZRT1 gene encodes the zinc transporter protein of a high-affinity uptake system induced by zinc limitation. P Natl A Sci. 1996a;93(6) :2454–2458. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhao H, Eide D. The ZRT2 gene encodes the low affinity zinc transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1996b;271(38) :23203–23210. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.38.23203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Grotz N, Fox T, Connolly E, Park W, Guerinot ML, Eide D. Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsis that respond to zinc deficiency. PNAS. 1998;95(12):7220–7224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nevo Y, Nelson N. The NRAMP family of metal-ion transporters. Biochim Biophys Ac (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research. 2006;1763(7):609–620. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vert U, Talke IN, Hanikenne M. Transition metal transport. FEBS Letters. 2007;581(12):2263–2272. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Thomine S, Wang R, Ward JM, Crawford NM, Schroeder JI. Cadmium and iron transport by members of a plant metal transporter family in Arabidopsis with homology to Nramp genes. PNAS. 2000;97(9):4991–4996. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Curie C, Panaviene Z, Loulergue C, Dellaporta SL, Briat JF, Walker EL. Maize yellow stripe1 encodes a membrane protein directly involved in Fe (III) uptake. Nature. 2000;409(6818):346. doi: 10.1038/35053080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mäser P, Thomine S, Schroeder JI, Ward JM, Hirschi K, Sze H, Harper JF. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(4):1646–1667. doi: 10.1038/35053080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Belouchi A, Kwan T, Gros P. Cloning and characterization of the OsNramp family from Oryza sativa, a new family of membrane proteins possibly implicated in the transport of metal ions. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;33(6):1085–1092. doi: 10.1023/A:1005723304911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Curie C, Alonso JM, le Jean M, Ecker JR, Briat JF. Involvement of NRAMP1 from Arabidopsis thaliana in iron transport. Biochem J. 2000;347(3) :749. doi: 10.1042/bj3470749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kampfenkel K, Kushnir S, Babiychuk E, Inzé D, van Montagu M. Molecular characterization of a putative Arabidopsis thaliana copper transporter and its yeast homologue. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(47):28479–28486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sancenón V, Puig S, Mateu-Andrés I, Dorcey IE, Thiele DJ, Peñarrubia L. The Arabidopsis copper transporter COPT1 functions in root elongation and pollen development. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:15348–15355. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313321200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Meharg AA, MacNair MR. Genetic correlation between arsenate tolerance and the rate of influx of arsenate and phosphate in Holcus lanatus L. Heredity. 1992;69(4):336. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hartley‐Whitaker J, Ainsworth G, Meharg AA. Copper‐and arsenate‐induced oxidative stress in Holcus lanatus L. clones with differential sensitivity. Plant Cell Environ. 2001;24(7):713–722. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00721.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Silver S. Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions-a review. Gene. 1996;179(1):9–19. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00323-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Palmiter RD, Findley SD. Cloning and functional characterization of a mammalian zinc transporter that confers resistance to zinc. EMBO J. 1995;14(4):639–649. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07042.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lee J, Reeves RD, Brooks RR, Jaffré T. Isolation and identification of a citrato-complex of nickel from nickel-accumulating plants. Phytochem. 1977;16(10):1503–1505. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(77)84010-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pich A, Scholz G. Translocation of copper and other micronutrients in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): nicotianamine-stimulated copper transport in the xylem. J Exp Bot. 1996;47(1):41–47. doi: 10.1093/jxb/47.1.41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Takahashi R, Ishimaru Y, Shimo H, Ogo Y, Senoura T, Nishizawa NK, Nakanishi HT. he OsHMA2 transporter is involved in root‐to‐shoot translocation of Zn and Cd in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35(11):1948–1957. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Andrés‐Colás N, Sancenón V, Rodríguez‐Navarro S, Mayo S, Thiele DJ, Ecker JR, Peñarrubia L. The Arabidopsis heavy metal P‐type ATPase HMA5 interacts with metallochaperones and functions in copper detoxification of roots. Plant J. 2006;45(2):225–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Durrett TP, Gassmann W, Rogers EE. The FRD3-mediated efflux of citrate into the root vasculature is necessary for efficient iron translocation. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(1):197–205. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.097162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roberts LA, Pierson AJ, Panaviene Z, Walker EL. Yellow stripe1. Expanded roles for the maize iron-phytosiderophore transporter. Plant Physiol. 2004;135(1):112–120. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.037572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.DiDonato RJ, Roberts LA, Sanderson T, Eisley RB, Walker EL. Arabidopsis Yellow Stripe‐Like2 (YSL2): a metal‐regulated gene encoding a plasma membrane transporter of nicotianamine–metal complexes. Plant J. 2004;39(3):403–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Schaaf G, Schikora A, Häberle J, Vert G, Ludewig U, Briat JF, von Wirén N. A putative function for the Arabidopsis Fe–phytosiderophore transporter homolog AtYSL2 in Fe and Zn homeostasis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46(5):762–774. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cobbett CS. Phytochelatins and their roles in heavy metal detoxification. Plant Physiol. 2000;123(3):825–832. doi: 10.1104/pp.123.3.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rauser WE. Phytochelatins and related peptides. Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Plant Physiol. 1995;109(4):1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Haag-Kerwer A, Schäfer HJ, Heiss S, Walter C, Rausch T. Cadmium exposure in Brassica juncea causes a decline in transpiration rate and leaf expansion without effect on photosynthesis. J Expl Bot. 1999;50(341):1827–1835. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.341.1827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Howden R, Goldsbrough PB, Andersen CR, Cobbett CS. Cadmium-sensitive, cad1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana are phytochelatin deficient. Plant Physiol. 1995;107(4):1059–1066. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Xiang C, Oliver DJ. Glutathione metabolic genes coordinately respond to heavy metals and jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10(9):1539–1550. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Robinson NJ, Tommey AM, Kuske C, Jackson PJ. Plant metallothioneins. Biochem J. 1993;295(1) :1. doi: 10.1042/bj2950001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rauser WE. Structure and function of metal chelators produced by plants. Cell Biochem Biophys. 1999;31(1):19–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02738153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Harrison PM, Arosio P. The ferritins: molecular properties, iron storage function and cellular regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta(BBA)-Bioenergetics. 1996;1275(3):161–203. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(96)00022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Dedman DJ, Treffry A, Harrison P. Interaction of aluminium citrate with horse spleen ferritin. Biochem J. 1992;287(2) :515. doi: 10.1042/bj2870515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Murgia I, Briat JF, Tarantino D, Soave C. Plant ferritin accumulates in response to photoinhibition but its ectopic overexpression does not protect against photoinhibition. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39(9):797–805. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01297-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Murgia I, Delledonne M, Soave C. Nitric oxide mediates iron‐induced ferritin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;30(5):521–528. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Savino G, Briat JF, Lobréaux S. Inhibition of the iron-induced ZmFer1 maize ferritin gene expression by antioxidants and serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(52):33319–33326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ravet K, Touraine B, Boucherez J, Briat JF, Gaymard F, Cellier F. Ferritins control interaction between iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;57(3):400–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG. Inventory of the superfamily of P-type ion pumps in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(2):696–706. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.2.696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Rea PA, Li ZS, Lu YP, Drozdowicz YM, Martinoia E. From vacuolar GS-X pumps to multispecific ABC transporters. Ann Rev Plant Boil. 1998;49(1):727–760. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Theodoulou FL. Plant ABC transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2000;1465(1):79–103. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00132-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Belouchi A, Cellier M, Kwan T, Saini HS, Leroux G, Gros P. The macrophage-specific membrane protein Nramp controlling natural resistance to infections in mice has homologues expressed in the root system of plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;29(6):1181–1196. doi: 10.1007/BF00020461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cailliatte R, Lapeyre B, Briat JF, Mari S, Curie C. The NRAMP6 metal transporter contributes to cadmium toxicity. Biochem J. 2009;422(2):217–228. doi: 10.1042/BJ20090655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Krämer U, Talke IN, Hanikenne M. Transition metal transport. FEBS Letters. 2007;581(12):2263–2272. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Peiter E, Montanini B, Gobert A, Pedas P, Husted S, Maathuis FJM, Blaudez D, Chalot M, Sanders DA. secretory pathwaylocalized cation diffusion facilitator confers plant manganese tolerance. PNAS-USA. 2007;104:8532–8537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609507104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ricachenevsky FK, Menguer PK, Sperotto RA, Williams LE, Fett JP. Roles of plant metal tolerance proteins (MTP) in metal storage and potential use in biofortification strategies. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:144. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Haney CJ, Grass G, Franke S, Rensing C. New developments in the understanding of the cation diffusion facilitator family. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;32(6):215–226. doi: 10.1007/s10295-005-0224-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gustin JL, Zanis MJ, Salt DE. Structure and evolution of the plant cation diffusion facilitator family of ion transporters. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11(1):76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Delhaize E, Kataoka T, Hebb DM, White RG, Ryan PR. Genes encoding proteins of the cation diffusion facilitator family that confer manganese tolerance. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1131–1142. doi: 10.1105/tpc.009134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.van der Zaal BJ, Neuteboom LW, Pinas JE, Chardonnens AN, Schat H, Verkleij JAC, Hooykaas PJJ. Overexpression of a novel Arabidopsis gene related to putative zinc transporter genes from animals can lead to enhanced zinc resistance and accumulation. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:1047–1055. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.3.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Milner MJ, Seamon J, Craft E, Kochian LV. Transport properties of members of the ZIP family in plants and their role in Zn and Mn homeostasis. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(1):369–381. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Vert G, Barberon M, Zelazny E, Séguéla M, Briat JF, Curie C. Arabidopsis IRT2 cooperates with the high-affinity iron uptake system to maintain iron homeostasis in root epidermal cells. Planta. 2009;229(6):1171–1179. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-0904-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lin YF, Liang HM, Yang SY, Boch A, Clemens S, Chen CC, Yeh KC. Arabidopsis IRT3 is a zinc‐regulated and plasma membrane localized zinc/iron transporter. New Phytol. 2009;182(2):392–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Talke IN, Hanikenne M, Krämer U. Zinc-dependent global transcriptional control, transcriptional deregulation, and higher gene copy number for genes in metal homeostasis of the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(1):148–167. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.076232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.van de Mortel JE, Villanueva LA, Schat H, Kwekkeboom J, Coughlan S, Moerland PD, Aarts MG. Large expression differences in genes for iron and zinc homeostasis, stress response, and lignin biosynthesis distinguish roots of Arabidopsis thaliana and the related metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(3):1127–1147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01764.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Creissen G, Edwards EA, Enard C, Wellburn A, Mullineaux P. Molecular characterization of glutathione reductase cDNAs from pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant J. 1992;2(1):129–131. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1992.t01-52-00999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Singh VP, Singh S, Kumar J, Prasad SM. Investigating the roles of ascorbate-glutathione cycle and thiol metabolism in arsenate tolerance in ridged Luffa seedlings. Protoplasma. 2015;252(5):1217–1229. doi: 10.1007/s00709-014-0753-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cobbett C, Goldsbrough P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53(1):159–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Mullineaux PM, Rausch T. Glutathione, photosynthesis and the redox regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. Photosynth Res. 2005;86(3):459–474. doi: 10.1007/s11120-005-8811-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Foyer CH, Noctor G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell. 2005;17(7):1866–1875. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.033589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ogawa K, Hatano-Iwasaki MA, Yanagida M, Iwabuchi M. Level of glutathione is regulated by ATP-dependent ligation of glutamate and cysteine through photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: mechanism of strong interaction of light intensity with flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1–8. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vernoux T, Wilson RC, Seeley KA, Reichheld JP, Muroy S, Brown S, May MJ. The ROOT MERISTEMLESS1/CADMIUM SENSITIVE2 gene defines a glutathione-dependent pathway involved in initiation and maintenance of cell division during postembryonic root development. Plant Cell. 2000;12(1):97–109. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Grill E, Winnacker E-L, Zenk MH. Phytochelatins a class of heavy-metal-binding peptides from plants, are functionally analogous to metallothioneins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:439–443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Noctor G, Arisi ACM, Jouanin L, Foyer CH. Manipulation of glutathione and amino acid biosynthesis in the chloroplast. Plant Physiol. 1998;118(2):471–482. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Waisberg M, Joseph P, Hale B, Beyersmann D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicology. 2003;192(2–3):95–117. 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00305-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bolin CM, Basha R, Cox D, Zawia NH, Maloney B, Lahiri DK, Cardozo-Pelaez F. Exposure to lead and the developmental origin of oxidative DNA damage in the aging brain. FASEB J. 2006;20(6):788–790. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5091fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Vallee BL, Ulmer DD. Biochemical effects of mercury, cadmium, and lead. Ann Rev Biochem. 1972;41(1):91–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.000515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Da Silva JF, Williams RJP. The biological chemistry of the elements: the inorganic chemistry of life. England, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Georgopoulos C, Welch WJ. Role of the major heat shock proteins as molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1993;9(1):601–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.003125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhu J-K. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167:313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Clemens S. Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 2006;88(11):1707–1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES