Abstract
Regulation of developmental gene expression in eukaryotes involves several levels. One of them is the maintenance of gene expression along the life of the animal once it is started by different triggers early in development. One of the questions in the field is when in developmental time, the animal start to use the different maintenance mechanisms. The trithorax group (TrxG) of genes was first characterized as essential for maintaining homeotic gene expression. The TrxG gene tonalli interacts genetically and physically with genes and subunits of the BRAHMA BAP chromatin remodeling complex and encodes TnaA proteins with putative E3 SUMO-ligase activity. In contrast to the phenocritic lethal phase of animals with mutations in other TrxG genes, tna mutant individuals die late in development. In this study we determined the requirements of TnaA for survival at pupal and adult stages, in different tna mutant genotypes where we corroborate the lack of TnaA proteins, and the presence of adult homeotic loss-of-function phenotypes. We also investigated whether the absence of TnaA in haltere and leg larval imaginal discs affects the presence of the homeotic proteins Ultrabithorax and Sex combs reduced respectively by using some of the characterized genotypes and more finely by generating TnaA defective clones induced at different stages of development. We found that, tna is not required for growth or survival of imaginal disc cells and that it is a fine modulator of homeotic gene expression.
Introduction
Homeotic (Hox) genes determine the segmental identity in Drosophila. In Drosophila Hox genes are in two complexes, the bithorax (BX-C) and the Antennapedia (ANTP-C) complexes. The initiation of Hox expression in specific segments occurs during embryogenesis and it is controlled by maternal and segmentation genes. Later on the activation or repression are maintained in the appropriate segments by proteins encoded by genes that belong to the trithorax group (TrxG) or the Polycomb group (PcG) respectively. Several TrxG and PcG proteins are involved in chromatin dynamics (reviewed by [1]). Drosophila has two types of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex BRAHMA (BAP and PBAP), which have as a catalytic ATPase, the Brahma protein. These two types have common and specific subunits. Common subunits are Brahma and Moira, while Osa is a specific subunit of BAP. Brahma, Moira and Osa are encoded by TrxG genes [2–4]. tonalli (tna) is a TrxG gene that was identified because it modifies brahma (brm), osa (osa) and moira (mor) [5].
tna encodes TnaA130 and TnaA123, two TnaA isoforms that presumptively have E3 SUMO ligase activity (see ahead, and [6]). These isoforms are derived either from different transcripts [7] and/or as a result of the processing of some of them [6]. TnaA130 and TnaA123 isoforms are differentially expressed during development and have specific compartmentalization within the cell [6].
SUMOylation is a post-translational modification similar to ubiquitination that adds a SUMO moiety to target proteins through the action of common activating E1 and conjugation E2 enzymes that in Drosophila are represented by single proteins. In contrast, there are several types of E3 ligases that choose or help the SUMOylation of a target protein. SUMOylation of a target protein can change its sub-compartmentalization within the cell or nucleus, can favor a change of partners and/or it can label it for degradation (revised in [8]). The PIAS (Protein Inhibitors of Acivated STAT [Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription]) family is a subgroup of E3 SUMO ligases that interact physically with E2 enzymes through a canonical 42 amino-acidic residues SP-RING (Siz/PIAS-Really Interesting) zinc finger [9]. TnaA share with the PIAS family the SP-RING [9] but this zinc finger is embedded in a unique 300 amino-acidic residues XSPRING (eXtended SP-RING) domain that is found in a few insect and vertebrate proteins and that is not present in the PIAS proteins [5]. TnaA physically interacts with Drosophila SUMO conjugating enzyme E2 in vivo and it coimmunoprecipitates with the Osa and Brm proteins from the BRM complex in embryo extracts [6].
Hox gene expression starts early at embryonic stages and prevails late in development. Therefore, it is controlled at each stage and tissue by different selected transcription factors that act on specific regulatory regions of each Hox gene (reviewed in [10]). Thus, it is probable that chromatin accessibility of these regulatory regions is under fine control involving chromatin remodelers and/or modifiers. As a TrxG gene, tna is required for the maintenance of expression of Hox genes [5], and adult animals with mutations in tna or in tna and brm, or osa mutations, show phenotypes that resemble Hox loss-of-function revealed in adult cuticular structures. One of the characteristics that make tna unique among TrxG genes is that it is required late in development [5], being the lethal phase of tna third instar larvae and pupal stages [5, 6]. As tna was identified as a brm-modifier gene and animals with tna mutant combinations reach the pharate stage and die before reaching adulthood presenting Hox loss-of-function phenotypes [5], one hypothesis is that its function is required to maintain Hox gene expression by facilitating chromatin remodeling by the BRAHMA BAP complex at these late stages of development. These facts make TnaA protein(s) interesting to study for the function they could have to ensure correct gene expression at these stages of development.
In this work we explored TnaA requirements for the expression of the Hox genes Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Sex combs reduced (Scr), through immunostaining of the respective Hox proteins in imaginal discs of late third instar larvae with mutant tna genotypes, or in TnaA defective clones generated at different stages of development. We found that although animals derived from these experiments do present Hox loss-of-function adult cuticular phenotypes, the wild-type domains of Hox expression are not visibly altered in imaginal discs. In contrast, ectopic Hox expression is suppressed in tna mutant backgrounds, leading to the conclusion that TnaA finely modulates Hox gene expression in imaginal cells and that its function can only be observed when Hox gene expression is not robustly regulated.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
All animals handling was approved by the Instituto de Biotecnología, UNAM, Bioethics Committee, Permit Number 359 (2018/05/04), which follows NOM-062 animal welfare Mexican law. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering. Animals were sacrificed by CO2 euthanasia.
Fly strains, and genetic procedures
The lesions of tna alleles and the target of the interference RNAs (RNAi) used in this work are represented in Fig 1A and, unless otherwise noted, they are described in Flybase [7]. Briefly, tna1 and tna5 are EMS-induced mutations. In tna1 Gln 566 changed to a stop codon [5]. tna5 was recovered after EMS mutagenesis in a genetic screen to identify brm-interacting mutations. The lesion is a T for A change at base 10,857,881 (genome release version 6) [11] that correspond to the limit between exon 3 and 4 (where exon 1 is UTR) from tna-RD and that affects the splicing of a 451 bp intron present in all tna transcripts (J. A. Kennison, personal communication). tnaEY22929 is a P{EPgy2} element insertion [12]. tna knockdown was achieved by expressing interference RNA (RNAi) from lines tnaGD12331 (inserted either in chromosome 2, or in chromosome 3) from Vienna GD collection (vector pGD264, construct ID 12331 Vienna Drosophila Resource Center, [13]), and tnaJF02536 from Perrimon’s pVALIUM10-derived TRiP [14] collections using different drivers. Drivers used in this work were Act5C-GAL4 [15] for ubiquitous expression, and MS1096-GAL4 [16], and A9-GAL4 [17] were used to drive gene expression to the dorsal region of the haltere pouch. Fly cultures and crosses were performed according to standard procedures. Flies were raised on yeast-molasses media at 25°C unless otherwise noted.
Fig 1. TnaA isoforms present in third instar larvae with different tna mutant genotypes.
(A) tna genomic region of the tna-RD transcript ([11], untranslated and translated exons in yellow and blue respectively) indicating the lesions (triangle for insertion and vertical black lines for point mutations) and the RNAi alleles (region targeted, red and green for tnaGD12331, and tnaJF02536 respectively) used in this work. (B) TnaA protein (grey, 1109 residues) indicating the XSPRING (purple) and SP-RING (green). The regions targeted by the polyclonal antibodies are shown, TnaAXSPRING (turquoise) and TnaAQTL (yellow). TnaA isoforms in different third instar larvae with tna mutant genotypes. The genotypes are indicated at the bottom of each panel (C-G), and they are ordered according to adult survival (H and Table 1). The genotypes of the larvae used to prepare the protein extracts tested are OregonR (wt), heterozygote tna/+ (m/+, Tubby larvae), and heteroallelic tna mutant (m/m, non Tubby larvae) (upper part in each panel). Western blots of soluble protein extracts from third instar larvae were probed with TnaAXSPRING (dilution 1:250) and TnaAQTL (1:3000) antibodies as indicated. TnaAXSPRING often detects also a minor 95–110 kDa protein (observed for example in C and D), that it is a bona fide TnaA-related product (not seen with preimmune). (G) TnaA knockdown in third instar larvae. tnaJF02536 RNAi-expression driven by Act5C-GAL4. Larvae were raised at 28°C. β-tubulin (C-F), and actin (G) were used as loading controls. Note that survival is observed when TnaA123 is present (tna1/tnaEY22929, and tnaEY22929/378 genotypes). (H) Quantification of TnaA123 and TnaA130 in larvae with the mutant-indicated genotypes and their adult survival according to Table 1. Note that even low amounts of TnaA123 are enough to allow animals to reach adulthood. (tna1/tnaEY22929, and tnaEY22929/378 genotypes). The percentage was calculated relative to the amount of each isoform observed in the wild-type OreR larvae using the TnaAXSPRING antibody (left in each panel).
Lethality of individuals carrying heteroallelic combinations of tna alleles was determined by counting the Tb+ progeny from crosses between parents with tna alleles balanced with In(3LR)TM6B (tna+) carrying the larval/pupal marker Tb1, and the adult markers DrMio, or Sb1. To evaluate pupariation and adult survival rates of heteroallelic tna individuals, and the survival of tna knocked-down flies, we performed a χ2 test (significance set at P<0.05), comparing the number of tna heteroallelic animals (tna/tna) with the one of their tna/+ siblings in each genotype. For the eclosion rate analysis, we performed a t-test (P<0.05), comparing the proportion of eclosed/total heteroallelic tna/tna pupae (non-Tubby). At least two crosses were performed for each genotype.
Loss-of-function Hox phenotypes were scored in adult animals from tna1/tnaEY22029, with tna knockdown and from crosses where imaginal tna1 clones were induced (see Induction of Mitotic Clones section), and compared their appearance on control animals derived from crosses without the tna1 FRT2A chromosome and thus tna+. Three replicas were performed for each experiment. To evaluate the Scr loss-of-function phenotype we scored legs from at least 15 males of each genotype. The percentage was calculated by dividing the number of legs with less than nine teeth per sex comb over the number of total male legs scored. Statistical significance was determined with a t-test (P<0.001).
To analyze the suppression effect of tna mutant alleles on ectopic Hox expression in imaginal discs, immunostaining with the respective Hox protein antibody was performed in at least 40 imaginal discs per genotype of interest, derived from at least three independent replicas per genotype. Statistical significance was determined using a t-test (P<0.05) to compare the number of discs from tna transheterozygous animals showing ectopic Hox suppression and the number of Pc3 discs showing ectopic Hox expression.
Antibodies, production and affinity purification of TnaA antibodies
To detect TnaA in this work, we used two polyclonal rabbit antibodies, anti-TnaAXSPRING, and anti-TnaAQTL raised against regions of the TnaAPD isoform identified and sequenced by Gutiérrez et al., (2003) and reported by Flybase [11]. Rabbit anti-TnaAXSPRING was raised as the one from rat reported in Monribot-Villanueva et al., (2013) immunizing animals with a purified GST fusion protein harboring the entire XSPRING domain contained in aminoacids 433–856 of TnaA. Anti-TnaAQTL was raised against the 14-mer QTLHKRNLLPLEHS peptide (aminoacids 691–704) by New England Peptide. Both antibodies (Fig 1B) were affinity-purified from total sera.
For Western blot assays, affinity-purified primary rabbit anti-TnaAQTL and anti-TnaAXSPRING antibodies were used at 1:3000 and 1:250 dilutions respectively. Mouse anti-β-tubulin (E7, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and anti-actin (JLA20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) were used each at 1:3000 dilution. Secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit HRP goat IgG (H+L) (65–6129) and anti-mouse HRP goat IgG/IgA/IgM (H+L) (A10668) (Invitrogen).
To detect Hox proteins Ubx and Scr, we used monoclonal antibodies FP3.38 [18] for Ubx, and 6H4.1 [19] for Scr. To detect Osa we used monoclonal Osa 15A8 [20]. These three antibodies were purchased from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank. Secondary antibodies anti-rabbit and anti-mouse Alexafluor 568 goat (red), and anti-rat Alexafluor 594 (Invitrogen) were used for confocal microscopy.
Protein extraction and analyses
Larval soluble protein extracts for Western analyses were obtained either by homogenizing whole larvae in lysis buffer (250 mM sucrose, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, Complete protease inhibitor (ROCHE), 5 mM EDTA, 1% SDS) or by inverting the anterior part of half larvae according to Cunningham et al., (2012) [21] directions, where 10–20 third instar larvae were cut in half and inverted to remove trachea, gut and adipose tissue. In this case the remaining tissue including central nervous system, imaginal discs and salivary glands was homogenized in lysis buffer (PBS, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EDTA and Complete protease inhibitor from ROCHE). Extracts obtained in either way were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C to remove cell debris. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot analyses. Immunoblots were done according to standard procedures and proteins of interest were detected with specific antibodies with the kits Supersignal West Pico, and Femto Chemiluminescent Substrates from Thermo Scientific, according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantification of TnaA isoforms in mutant genotypes was done by using the densitometry measurement tool from ImageJ (Fiji). Raw values were normalized according to the respective loading control in each lane, and final values were expressed as a percentage of protein relative to the one found in wild-type animals.
Induction of mitotic clones
The tna1 allele recombined into an FRT2A chromosome (tna1 FRT2A) was a kind gift from J. A. Kennison. tna1 clones were induced either with the hs-FLP [22] or the Ubx-FLP [23, 24] drivers as FLPase sources.
To induce clones in imaginal discs with heat shock, we basically used the protocol reported by [25]. Briefly, clones were induced in the progeny of the cross tna1 FRT2A/TM6B, Tb, Dr X hs-FLP; +; Ubi-GFPX2 FRT2A that was set up at 25°C. Clones were induced in the progeny at 24 h after egg laying (AEL) with a single 37.5°C heat shock for 1 h. Some clones in haltere discs were induced in an egg collection of 4 h, applying a heat shock of 38.5°C for 1 h to the progeny at 9 h AEL.
We also used the Ubx-FLP [24], that induces recombination through a Ubx enhancer that is active in all imaginal discs (IDE, Imaginal Disc Enhancer), identified in the PBX-41 segment [23]. Crosses were set with Ubx-FLP/Y; tna1 FRT2A/TM6B/+ X +; Ubi-GFP FRT2A, or males +; FRT82B osa308/TM6B Dr, Tb X Ubx-FLP; +; FRT82B Ubi-mRFP at 25°C. Animals with induced clones either with hs-FLP or with Ubx-FLP were kept at 25°C until they reached 110 to 115 h AEL, where discs were dissected for immunostaining with the antibodies of interest and observed using confocal microscopy as stated in the next section, or animals were allowed to reach the adult stage to estimate cuticular Hox loss-of-function phenotypes.
Immunostaining of imaginal discs and cuticle preparations
Wing and haltere discs were obtained from male and female third instar larvae. Male first leg discs were isolated from sexed third instar larvae to study Scr expression. Immunostaining of imaginal discs were done as described by Blair (2000) [26] with some modifications. Briefly, imaginal discs were dissected in cold 1X PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Discs were washed with PBT (1X PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100), blocked for 1 h with 0.1% bovine serum albumine in PBST 1X with 250 mM NaCl at 4°C. Primary antibodies were added at appropriate dilutions overnight at 4°C, and the next day discs were washed with PBT. Secondary antibodies were added together with Hoechst (0.1 ug/ml) for 2 h at room temperature washed again with PBST and after removal of PBST, discs were mounted in 80% glycerol, 4% n-propyl gallate in 1X PBS and stored in darkness until observation in confocal microscopy.
Fluorescent images from immunostained imaginal discs, or for detection of Hox proteins or apoptotic cells (TUNEL assay), were acquired with an Olympus Inverted FV1000, or a 2P Upright confocal FV1000 confocal microscopes with a 20X 0.75 or 60X 1.3 numerical aperture objectives. Images were processed using ImageJ (Fiji) and Adobe Photoshop CS software.
Adult cuticle preparations were processed by standard procedures by boiling flies in 10% KOH, washed in distilled water, and mounting them in glycerol 50% to observe them in a Nikkon Eclipse E600 upright microscope equipped with an Amscope MU500 digital camera.
Cell survival analyses
To assess the role of tna on cell survival, we compared the areas of both tna1/tna1 (GFP-/-), and tna+/tna+ twin-spot (GFP+/+) clones induced 24 h AEL. Images were analyzed with ImageJ (Fiji) to measure the area of 13 clones and their twin spots. A paired t-test was used to assess significant differences in their respective areas (P<0.05) (S1 Fig).
To determine whether tna1/tna1 genotype could cause cell death, we performed a TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated dUTP Nick end Labeling) cell-death assay, with the In Situ Cell Death Detection kit TMR red, (Roche, cat. no. 12156792910), according to manufacturer instructions. Apoptotic cells in wing imaginal discs of genotype MS1096-GAL4 UAS-rasV12 UAS-dlgRNAi were used as a positive control. For the cell death assay, imaginal discs were dissected, fixed and washed as for immunostaining. Confocal images were captured as stated in the previous section.
Results
tna is required at late phases of development
Pharates deficient in tna present cuticular Hox loss-of-function phenotypes [5]. To further study the effect of Hox gene expression in imaginal discs lacking TnaA at larval stages, we inspected with more detail a selected tna allelic set of combinations producing animals that die between the third instar larval stage and adulthood (Table 1). We used the tna alleles (Fig 1A) tna1 [5], tna5 that is a null allele [6], and tnaEY22929 [12] that is a P{EPgy2} element insertion at 5’ end of tna. We combined each of these alleles between them, and with two chromosomal deficiencies that uncover tna, Df(3L)378 and Df(3L)vin2. We also knocked down tna expression by inducing the expression of two different RNAi constructs, tnaJF02536 from the TRiP collection [14] and tnaGD12331 from the Vienna GD collection [13] directed towards different regions of tna mRNAs (Fig 1A).
Table 1. Survival of animals with tna mutant genotypes at pupal and adult stages.
| PUPAE | ADULTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pupariation Rateb (Observed/ Expected)c |
Eclosion Rateb (Eclosed/Total tna/tna Pupae)d |
Survivalb (Observed/ Expected)c |
|
| Relevant Genotypea | |||
| tna1 | |||
| tna5 | 147/495e (30) | 0/147 (0) | 0/476e (0) |
| Df(3L)378 | 115/392 (29) | 0/115 (0) | 0/383 (0) |
| Df(3L)vin2 | 84/215 (39) | 0/84 (0) | 0/174 (0) |
| tna5 | |||
| Df(3L)378 | 129/204 (63) | 0/129 (0) | 0/172 (0) |
| Df(3L)vin2 | 90/155 (58) | 0/90 (0) | 0/112 (0) |
| tnaEY22029 | |||
| tna1 | 139/132 (105)ns | 63/139 (45) | 37/123 (30) |
| tna5 | 132/153 (86)ns | 117/132 (89)ns | 110/144 (76)ns |
| Df(3L)378 | 231/253 (91)ns | 207/231 (90)ns | 188/207 (90)ns |
| Df(3L)vin2 | 307/380 (81)ns | 0/307 (0) | 0/317 (0) |
a. Relevant genotype shows the tna alleles in heteroallelic animals evaluated. The alleles carried by parental males are shown in bold at the top of each section.
b. Puparium formation, eclosion rate, and adult survival were evaluated in progeny from the same crosses in at least two independent replicas. Statistical significance in each case was determined with a χ2 or t-test (P<0.05) as stated in Material and Methods. Non-significant differences are indicated (ns).
c. The percentage (in parentheses) of tna/tna heteroallelic individuals (non-Tubby pupae or non-Sb and/or non-Dr adults) was calculated taking as 100% the tna/Balancer individuals in progeny (half of the Tubby pupae or half of the Sb and/or Dr adults).
d. Percentages of eclosed pupae (in parentheses) were calculated dividing the number of eclosed over the total number of tna/tna (non-Tubby) (non-eclosed plus eclosed) pupae.
e. The disparity between the numbers of expected pupae and adults (compare first and third columns) is caused because the balancer chromosomes from mothers and fathers have Tubby as a larval/pupal marker, and in adults one balancer chromosome carried Sb and the other one has Dr. It was not possible to distinguish which balancer chromosome carry each Tubby pupae counted, but one class carrying one of the parental balancer chromosomes is more lethal than the other. When divided by two, to calculate the expected tna/tna progeny we found a difference between the number of Tb eclosed pupae and Sb or Dr adult flies. e. g. first lane: Half of Tubby pupae = 495. Adults with Dr marker = 476.
The genetic analyses we made involve the determination of pupal and adult survival of animals with heteroallelic tna combinations (Table 1). We evaluated the number of heteroallelic animals that reach the pupal stage, and of those we counted how many were able to eclose from their pupal cases. We found that tna1 is the strongest allele tested. This is expected because we have shown previously that tna1 is a dominant negative mutation [6]. Only between 30–40% of the expected animals with tna1 as one of the alleles in the genotype (together with tna5 or with Df(3L)378 and Df(3L)vin2), reach the pupal stage. Close to 60% of the animals with tna5 (together with any of the two deficiency chromosomes) reach the pupal stage, dying before reaching adulthood. In contrast, 80–100% of the animals with tnaEY22929 reach the pupal stage. None of the pupae with tna1 or tna5 were able to eclose from their pupal cases, with the notorious exception of combinations of these alleles with tnaEY22929 allele where some animals survive until adulthood. 45–90% of animals with tnaEY22929 eclose (with the exception of animals harboring also Df(3L)vin2 that die as pupae), and from those 30–90% do reach adulthood. Of notice, all the adult animals of tna1/ tnaEY22929 genotype present the held-out wings phenotype (Fig 2A) that was the base for the identification of tna as a brm-modifier in our original screen [5]. Adult flies with tna1/ tnaEY22929, or tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 genotypes, present Hox loss-of-function phenotypes such as loss of sex comb teeth in male first legs (Scr), and partial haltere to wing transformation (Ubx) (Fig 2A and Table 2).
Fig 2. Hox transformations in tna mutant and tna knocked down adult animals.
(A) Held-out wing (upper), reduction of the number of sex comb teeth in first leg of males (middle) and ectopic bristle in the haltere (lower), indicating loss-of-function of Antennapedia (Antp) P2 promoter, Scr, and Ubx respectively, in tnaEY22929/tna1 (right), compared to wild type phenotypes (left) in tnaEY22929/+ flies. (B) Appearance of ectopic bristles in halteres indicates a haltere-to-wing transformation in flies expressing the RNAi produced by the tnaJF02536 allele with different GAL4 drivers (Act5C, A9, MS1096) (right). Parental flies with the mentioned drivers (not shown) have halteres with wild-type phenotypes (OreR haltere in upper left picture). Note that the location of the ectopic bristle in animals with tna knockdown, depends on the location where the tna RNAi is directed. (C) Males with ubiquitous tna knockdown (Act5C>tnaJF02536), do not survive to adulthood. Presented here is the first leg of a pupal male individual with a decrease in the number of sex comb teeth (right) compared to wild type (left). For percentages of these phenotypes see Table 2.
Table 2. Hox phenotypes in adults with tna mutant genotypes, with tna knockdown, or where tna- clones were induced in imaginal discs.
| Relevant Genotype |
Antp P2 Held-out wings |
Ubx Haltere to winga |
Scr < 9 teeth/sex combb |
|---|---|---|---|
| OreR | 0/72 (0) | 0/72 (0) | 0/48 (0) |
| tnaEY22929 | 0/62 (0) | 0/62 (0) | 0/44 (0) |
| tna1/tnaEY22929 | 54/54 (100) | 15/54 (28) | 30/39 (77) |
| tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 | 0/63 (0) | 7/63 (11) | 32/37 (87) |
| tna knockdownc | |||
| Act5-GAL4 | 0/85 (0) | 0/85 (0) | 0/43 (0) |
| tnaJF25036 | 0/96 (0) | 0/96 (0) | 0/32 (0) |
| Act5-GAL4>tnaJF25036 | 0/136 (0) | 22/136 (16) | 4/29 (14) |
| A9-GAL4 | NA | 0/110 (0) | NA |
| A9-GAL4>tnaJF25036 | NA | 53/345 (15) | NA |
| MS1096-GAL4 | NA | 0/95 (0) | NA |
| MS1096-GAL4; Ubx1 | NA | 19/87 (22) | NA |
| MS1096-GAL4>tnaJF25036 | NA | 12/152 (8) | NA |
| MS1096-GAL4>tnaJF25036/Ubx1 | NA | 122/142 (86) | NA |
| Adults from mitotic imaginal clonesNA | |||
| hs-FLP; tna1 FRT2A/Ubi-GFP FRT2A | |||
| No heat shock | 0/47 (0) | 0/47 (0) | 0/49 (0) |
| Heat shockd | 23/159 (15) | 1/55 (2) | 2/49 (4) |
| Ubx-FLP; tna1 FRT2A | 0/29 (0) | 0/29 (0) | 0/37 (0) |
| Ubx-FLP; tna1 FRT2A/Ubi-GFP FRT2A | 34/50 (68) | 7/50 (14) | 0/33 (0) |
Percentages are in parentheses. NA is non applicable. The number of individuals showing the indicated Hox loss-of-function phenotypes is statistically significant (t-test, P<0.01, see Material and methods). Statistical test was not applicable (NA) for the evaluation of phenotypes of adults from mitotic imaginal clones induction because in principle it was not known how many clones were induced in each case.
a. Adult individuals with at least one partially transformed haltere.
b. Adult (tna1/tnaEY22929) or pharate (Act5-GAL4>tnaJF25036) males with less than 9 sex comb teeth per leg.
c. Flies expressing tna RNAi from tnaJF25036 were raised at 28°C.
d. Heat shock was applied as established in Material and Methods at 24 AEL.
As tna locus harbors different transcripts that produce different isoforms, mainly TnaA130 and TnaA123, we were interested in correlate which of them was present in larvae of the genotypes studied. We performed Western analyses with anti-TnaA antibodies (Fig 1B) that detect both TnaA130 and TnaA123 isoforms (TnaAXSPRING) or TnaA123 preferentially (TnaAQTL) in protein soluble extracts from larvae of some of the genotypes tested and from its siblings that carried a wild type tna allele for comparison (Fig 1C–1F). We also tested animals with genotypes that included the tna- Df(3L)378 and Df(3L)vin2 deficiency chromosomes (Fig 1D and 1F). Animals with combinations that include either one of these deficiencies, survive up to the third instar larvae stage in significant percentages (from 30–90% of the expected individuals, Table 1) and then die as pupae. This fact allows us to analyze protein extracts from these mutant third instar larvae, making it easier to determine which TnaA isoforms were affected specifically with the tna mutant alleles we were testing, given that combined with the deficiency chromosomes, these alleles would be the only source of TnaA. We also analyzed soluble extracts from larvae with tna knockdown by the expression of tnaJF02536 at 28°C (Fig 1G).
We found that TnaA130 disappeared in all the mutant genotypes tested (Fig 1), particularly when one of the alleles is tnaEY22929, while TnaA123 disappears (tna1/tna5, Fig 1C and 1H), or it is still detected at a much lower concentration than in a wild-type condition (see for example, tna1/tnaEY22029, or tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378, Fig 1E, 1F and 1H) with antibodies (TnaAQTL and TnaAXSPRING). We also found that RNAi expression from tnaJF02536 at 28°C, knocked down tna expression almost 90% (see ahead, Fig 1G). In particular, we compared tnaEY22929/Df(3L)vin2 and tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 (Fig 1D and 1F) because they give totally different results regarding survival to adulthood (Table 1). While 90% of tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 animals survive to adult stages, none of the tnaEY22929/Df(3L)vin2 animals survive to this stage. In contrast, animals from both genotypes reach the pupal stage with the difference that 100% of tnaEY22929/Df(3L)vin2 die before they eclose (Table 1). Western analyses are in agreement with these findings given that tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 larvae still present some detectable levels of TnaA123 protein (Fig 1F and 1H), that may account for their 90% survival to adulthood, meanwhile in tnaEY22929/Df(3L)vin2 larvae, TnaA123 isoform is barely detectable (Fig 1D and 1H) and they present 100% of lethality in adult stages.
These results indicate two findings. First, the presence of TnaA130 is not required for survival to adulthood, because animals lacking it, reach this stage (tna1/tnaEY22029, and tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378). We noticed that although tna1/tnaEY22929 animals present a slightly higher amount of TnaA123 than the one found in tnaEY22929/Df(3L)378 animals, the latter ones have a better adult survival (90% compared to 30% of tna1/tnaEY22929). This difference may be due to the fact that tna1 is a dominant negative [6]. The second finding is that the P{EPgy2} element insertion in the tnaEY22929 allele, is affecting the expression of tna-RA transcript that would be encoding TnaA130. Moreover, one of our hypotheses was that TnaA123 could originate from TnaA130 processing [6], but with these data, we support the hypothesis that TnaA123 and TnaA130, are translated from different transcripts, being those tna-RD and tna-RA respectively.
For tna knockdown, two UAS-RNAi constructs, tnaJF02536 and tnaGD12331, were expressed at 18, 25 and 28°C with the ubiquitous driver Act5C-GAL4. A higher percentage of lethality is observed by increasing tna RNAi expression at higher temperatures (Table 3). RNAi expression from either tnaJF02536 or tnaGD12331 alleles caused lethality of pupae and pharates, being males more sensitive than females. tnaJF02536 induction caused more lethality than tnaGD12331 induction and then it was further characterized. The effectiveness of the interference, caused by the expression of the RNAi from tnaJF02536, was confirmed by the low protein levels found in these larvae (Fig 1G). Females from these experiments reached adulthood in higher percentages than males, but they die within 10 days after eclosion (Table 3). As for tna1/ tnaEY22929 animals, knocking down tna through RNAi, result in Ubx and Scr loss-of-function phenotypes at, albeit low, measurable penetrance (Fig 2B and 2C and Table 2). Act5C-Gal4 is a strong ubiquitous driver. To study the effect of knocking down tna in a restricted spatial domain within the haltere, we induced the expression of tna RNAi to the dorsal region of the haltere pouch with the GAL4 drivers MS1096 and A9 (see Material and methods). The animals from these experiments showed ectopic bristles located mainly in the dorsal region of the haltere capitellum. To test whether this partial transformation was caused by a reduction in Ubx expression, we tested whether tna knockdown (by expressing RNAi from tnaJF02536), enhances the loss-of-function Ubx phenotypes observed in animals with the null Ubx1 allele [27]. The result of this genetic combination (Table 2) was the appearance of a single ectopic bristle in the dorsal distal pouch region of the transformed halteres (Fig 2B). tna knockdown enhanced the penetrance and the expressivity of the Ubx1 phenotype (from 22 to 86%, observed as a higher percentage of halteres with a single larger bristle than the one present in halteres of Ubx1/+ halteres genotype) (Table 2, Fig 2B).
Table 3. Survival of flies with tna knockdown.
| Relevant Genotype | Survival to adulthood of flies bred at: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18°C | 25°C | 28°C | ||
| Act5C-GAL4/+a | ||||
| tnaGD12331 | Fb | 95/105 (91)ns | 81/127 (64) | 4/98 (4) |
| Mb | 107/114 (94)ns | 46/97 (47) | 0/112 (0) | |
| tnaJF02536 | F | 81/115 (70) | 107/222 (48) | 5/125 (4) |
| M | 1/109 (1) | 1/183 (1) | 3/169 (2) | |
a. Act5C-GAL4 driver directs ubiquitous expression of tnaGD12331 or tnaJF02536 (Fig 1A).
b. Female (F) or male (M) adult progeny expressing the indicated RNAi. The proportion indicates the survival of adult flies expressing the indicated RNAi with respect to the survival of the healthier class in the cross (which is not expressing the RNAi) at the indicated temperature. Percentages of each proportion are in parentheses. Note that survival is more affected in males than in females and it diminishes by increasing the breeding temperature, where RNAi expression is increased. Data are from three independent crosses for each genotype, n = 3, and are statistically significant (χ2 test, P<0.01), except the ones labeled ns (non-significant).
In conclusion, reduction of TnaA dosages caused by different tna null or hypomorphic alleles or by knocking down its expression, causes different grades of lethality through development and, when animals are able to form cuticles, homeotic defects caused by loss-of-function of several Hox genes are evident at different extents (penetrances and expressivities).
tna1 mitotic clones induced either at embryonic or larval stages survive normally
Previously we showed that loss of maternal tna function is completely rescued paternally and loss of both maternal and zygotic functions caused lethality primarily at the third larval instar [5]. To further investigate the role of tna in imaginal disc cells, we generated tna deficient mitotic clones. We recombined the lesion in tna1 from a tna1FRT2A chromosome (gift from J. A. Kennison, see Methods), with the FLP/FRT system, expressing the FLPase either by heat shock at different times of development (Fig 3A), or under the control of an enhancer active in all discs (Imaginal Disc Enhancer, IDE) [24], identified in the Ubx PBX-41 segment [23]. With both methods, we were able to get tna- GFP- clones that we checked by immunostaining with the anti-TnaAXSPRING antibody (Fig 3B). We were able to induce tna mutant clones in all the discs and we found in general that these clones survive well in all types of imaginal discs. We did not notice any change in the size or in the frequency of appearance of the GFP- tna- clones compared to GFP+ tna+ twin spots in discs (GFP panels in Fig 3B, 3C and S1 Fig), with the exception of clones in haltere discs, where we noticed often that the GFP+ twin spot was slightly larger than the tna- GFP- cells (e. g. GFP panel in Fig 4A). Neither, we observed any effect in cells in the vicinity within the border of tna- clones. We also evaluated cell death by TUNEL in clones made in the wing disc (Fig 3C), finding that there was no difference in survival between tna1/tna+, tna+/tna+ cells, and tna1/tna1 mutant clones, while we detect cell death in the dorsal pouch of wing discs where apoptosis and overgrowth are induced by disrupting apical-basal cell polarity (Fig 3C) as reported by [28].
Fig 3. Induction of TnaA defective mitotic clones in third instar imaginal discs at different times of development does not cause cell death.
(A) Timeline of heat shock pulses (black triangles After Egg Laying, AEL) applied to induce mitotic recombination in animals bearing hs-FLP (hs-FLP; +; tna1 FRT2A/Ubi-GFPX2 FRT2A). (B) Immunostaining of TnaA with the TnaAXSPRING antibody in a wing disc where mitotic clones were induced. DNA was stained with Hoechst (blue) to show nuclear presence. GFP (green) marks the tna+/tna- and that did not recombine (medium green intensity), and the tna+/tna+ (strong green intensity) cells result of the recombination event. GFP- marks the tna-/tna- clone, as corroborated by the absence of TnaA immunostaining (red). (C) TUNEL death assay (red) performed in imaginal discs with tna- clones (GFP-), Hoechst (blue), (tna+ cells are GFP+, green) (lower panels). As a positive cell death control (red), apoptotic cells were detected in larval discs of the genotype MS1096-GAL4 UAS- rasV12 UAS-dlgRNAi (see text) (upper panels). Note also that in general here and in the next figures, the number and size of the tna-/tna- (GFP-) cells compared to the ones in the tna+/tna+ (GFP+) clone seems to be similar, showing that tna-/tna- cells do not present an obvious defect.
Fig 4. Ubx protein is present in TnaA or Osa defective mitotic clones in haltere discs.
TnaA (GFP- in A and C and Fig 3B) and Osa (RFP- in E and E’, and S3 Fig) defective mitotic clones induced by expressing FLPase either from hs-FLP (A and B) or Ubx-FLP (C, D, E’, and F’) in haltere imaginal discs. Almost the whole disc is shown in C and D to note that the absence of TnaA (GFP-) in any region of the disc does not affect the presence of Ubx, which is observed in a wild-type pattern. Ubx protein was immunostained with monoclonal antibody FP3.38 [18] (red signal in B, and D, and green in F, and F’). Note that no decrease or absence of the Hox protein Ubx is observed in any of the TnaA- or Osa- clones (labeled with pointed white shapes).
Thus, according to the results of these genetic and immunostaining assays, in general tna does not seem to influence cell survival, or cell number or size in imaginal discs.
Influence of TnaA in Hox expression in larval imaginal discs
Our next goal was to study Hox expression in tna- cells in the region of imaginal discs that will become the adult cuticle where loss-of-function homeotic transformations have been characterized. In particular, we focused on Ubx and Scr expression that is affected in pharates with tna mutant genotypes [5], in adults with the genotype tna1/ tnaEY22929 (Fig 2A, Table 2), or where tna expression has been knocked down through the expression of the RNAi from tnaJF02536 (Fig 2B and 2C, Table 2).
In a wild-type haltere disc, Ubx is expressed strongly in the pouch (the region that will become the haltere of the adult fly), being the most prominent the posterior compartment [29] (see for example, Fig 4D). In these regions, Ubx represses several genes that direct wing development [30]. The halteres from the animals with the tna mutant aforementioned genotypes, present a mild haltere-to-wing transformation indicated by the presence of ectopic bristles in the haltere capitellum (Fig 2A and 2B). This resembles a loss-of-function phenotype of Ubx [30]. Taking into account these observations, we made tna- (GFP-) clones in haltere discs by inducing recombination either with an hs-FLP (Fig 4A), or with the Ubx-FLP (Fig 4C). We dissected haltere discs from animals where clones were induced, and they were immunostained for Ubx (Fig 4B and 4D, red signal). Other animals from the same experiments were allowed to reach the adult stage to evaluate the presence of the ectopic bristles in the haltere (Ubx- phenotype) (Table 2). We found that the Ubx- phenotype was present in the halteres of adult flies where clones were induced (2% to 14% when recombination was induced either with heat shock or with the Ubx-FLPase, respectively, Table 2). The presence of this transformation corroborate that cells producing the mutant phenotype in the haltere disc were hit by the recombination event. We tried several protocols to induce tna- clones at different moments of development (with heat shock at 9 or 24 h AEL as stated in Fig 3A) (Fig 4A) or by getting tna- clones in several regions of the disc (by driving recombination with the Ubx-FLP that is expressed widely in imaginal discs, Fig 4C). We specially looked for clones in the region of the haltere disc that produces the ectopic bristle in the adult halteres in tna mutant animals from the same experiments (Table 2), and we could not detect a reduction Ubx (Fig 4B and 4D) in any of the tna- (GFP-) clones induced with any of the treatments tested.
Scr is normally expressed in the prothoracic leg imaginal disc mostly in a crescent-shaped region in the anterior half of the disc, and in marginal regions near the disc stalk, specially on the posterior side [19] (for example, Fig 5A). tna mutant adults (e. g. tna1/tnaEY22029) with decreased TnaA levels (Fig 1E), present Scr loss-of-function phenotype [5] (Fig 2A, and Table 2 this work). This phenotype is observed in adult males as a reduction in the number of sex comb teeth in the prothoracic T1 first leg. We immunostained for Scr, leg discs of tna1/tnaEY22029 animals finding that decreased TnaA level does not affect immunostaining of Scr (S2 Fig).
Fig 5. Scr proteins are present in TnaA defective mitotic clones in prothoracic T1 leg imaginal discs.
Scr immunostaining pattern in wild type OreR prothoracic leg discs (A). The disc region from where the sex combs in the first leg are originated in the male is labeled by a pointed rectangle (A) and amplified in A’. TnaA (GFP- in B-B’ and Fig 4B) defective mitotic clones induced by expressing FLPase from the hs-FLP chromosome in T1 leg imaginal discs. Scr protein was immunostained with the monoclonal antibody 6H4.1 [19] (red signal in A-A’, and C-C’). Note that no decrease or absence of Scr is observed in the TnaA- clones (labeled with pointed white shapes C, and amplified in C’).
Therefore, we generated tna- (GFP-) clones in leg discs, inducing recombination by expressing the FLPase under the control of a heat shock promoter (Fig 5B and 5B’) (see Material and methods). Some animals were allowed to reach the adult stage, finding that 4% of the first leg of males analyzed have less than nine sex comb teeth (compared to a mean of 10.5 teeth per comb in wild type), phenotype caused by Scr loss-of-function (Table 2). tna- (GFP-) clones from leg discs of animals of the same experiment were immunostained for Scr (Fig 5C and 5C’, red signal) and, as for the tna1/tnaEY22029 discs, we could not find any tna- clone where the signal of Scr immunostaining was reduced.
Osa is a subunit of the BRAHMA chromatin remodeling complex BAP. The osa gene interacts strongly with tna in a genetic assay of Hox gene expression in pharates and adults [5]. Thus, we also made osa- (RFP-) clones in haltere (Fig 4E and 4E’, and S3 Fig) discs by inducing recombination of the strong loss-of-function osa308 allele [31]. In these Osa- clones, as in the ones for tna, Ubx levels, estimated by immunostaining are not affected (Fig 4F and 4F’ green signal), indicating that the requirement of Osa, in the majority of these cells, is not essential for keeping the levels of these Hox proteins.
The penetrance of the Ubx and Scr loss-of-function phenotypes in animals derived from the experiments where the tna- clones were induced, was very low (in the best of cases, 14% of halteres with an ectopic bristles, when tna- clones were induced with Ubx-FLPase, Table 2), and we wondered whether we were not being able to detect by immunostaining the specific cells affected in the haltere or leg discs that would give origin to the transformed tissue in each case (the ectopic bristle found in the transformed halteres or the reduction of the number of sex comb teeth in the first leg of males, Table 2). Thus, we studied the effect of tna mutations in a derepressed homeotic background caused by loss of function of Polycomb.
Ubx is normally expressed in the haltere disc while in the wing disc (Fig 6A, shows wing disc organization), Ubx expression is observed only in discrete areas such as the peripodial membrane [18] and it is not expressed in the epithelia. Scr is normally expressed in the first prothoracic leg imaginal disc (T1), but not in the second and third thoracic leg discs (T2 and T3) (Fig 7A). Ubx and Scr expression is derepressed in imaginal discs of animals harboring PcG loss-of-function mutations such as Pc3 (Figs 6C, 6C’ and 7B) [32, 33]. Derepression of both, Ubx (compare Fig 6B, 6C and 6C’) and Scr (compare Fig 7A and 7B) can be observed in wing, T2 and T3 leg discs of Pc3 heterozygote animals respectively. tna mutations suppress derepression of both Hox genes evaluated in cuticles from Pc3 pharate animals [5]. To investigate how tna influences Ubx and Scr expression in this context, we immunostained Ubx and Scr proteins in imaginal discs derived from Pc3 (Figs 6C, 6C’ and 6H and 7B and 7E respectively) and Pc3/tnaEY22929 (Figs 6C, 6D, 6D’ and 6G and Fig 7C and 7E respectively) animals. As expected, we found ectopic production of both Ubx [94% (44/47) of Pc3 wing discs with Ubx signal, Fig 6B, 6B’ and 6G] and Scr proteins [93 (40/43) and 85% (33/39) of T2 and T3 Pc3 leg discs respectively with Scr signal, Fig 7B and 7E], while in discs from Pc3/tnaEY22929 animals, tna haploinsufficiency suppresses close to 95% (2/42) Ubx ectopic expression (Fig 6D and 6H) and 83 to 87% Scr ectopic expression (9/52, and 6/47, positive Scr T2 and T3 immunostained leg discs, respectively) (Fig 7C and 7E). In a few cases [6% (2/42), Fig 6E and 6H], Ubx suppression was not total. A few cells remain that still have detectable Ubx immunostaining signal, (Fig 6E and 6E’). In the case of Scr, the suppression was clearly observed in both Pc3/tnaEY22929 T2 and T3 leg discs (Fig 7C, in comparison to Fig 7B and 7E), while Scr expression in T1 leg disc looks normal (Fig 7 compare Fig 7A or 7B and 7C, see also Fig 7E).
Fig 6. TnaA and Osa are necessary for ectopic presence of Ubx protein in wing Pc3 imaginal discs.
(A) Wing disc organization. The posterior dorso-ventral margin is indicated (black arrowhead). Immunostaining of Ubx protein (red) with the FP3.38 [18] antibody in wild type OreR (B), Pc3 (C, and C’), Pc3/tnaEY22929 (D, E-E’), and Pc3/osa308 (F, G-G’) wing discs. Discs were also stained with Hoechst to observe nuclei (blue). The region amplified in C’, E’ and G’ is labeled in C, E and G (white arrowheads). (H) Quantification of wing discs with positive Ubx immunostaining (Ubx+). The number of Ubx+/Total wing discs counted is indicated at the x-axis of the graphic. At least 40 discs of each genotype are counted derived from at least three independent replicas. There is statistical significance (t-test, P<0.05) in the proportions of discs with detectable Ubx among different genotypes (bottom) are indicated with an asterisk (*). Note that ectopic Ubx expression in Pc3 wing discs (B, B’) is suppressed by tna (C-D’) or osa (E-F’) haploinsufficiency.
Fig 7. TnaA and Osa are necessary for ectopic presence of Scr protein in T2 and T3 Pc3 leg imaginal discs.
Immunostaining of Scr protein (red) with the 6H4.1 [19] antibody in wild type OreR (A), Pc3 (B), Pc3/tnaEY22929 (C), and Pc3/osa308 (D) T1-3 leg discs. (E) Quantification of haltere discs with positive Scr immunostaining (Scr+). The number of Scr+/Total haltere discs counted is indicated at the x-axis of the graphic. At least 40 discs of each genotype are counted derived from at least three independent replicas. Significant differences (t-test, P<0.05) in the proportions of discs with detectable Ubx among different genotypes (bottom) are indicated with an asterisk (*). Genotypes of discs counted are indicated in the bottom. Note that ectopic Scr expression in Pc3 T2 and T3 leg discs (B) is suppressed by tna (C) or osa (D) haploinsufficiency.
In the same way, we tested whether osa haploinsufficiency was able to suppress Hox protein immunostaining in Pc3 discs. Indeed, we found that ectopic expression of Ubx (Fig 6B) and Scr (Fig 7B) in Pc3 wing discs was almost totally suppressed when a copy of osa308 was introduced (Pc3/osa308 discs) [83% (6/35) of suppression for Ubx, Fig 6F–6H, and 75% (12/49), and 78% (11/51) Scr suppression in T2 and T3 leg discs respectively, Fig 7D–7E].
In summary tna and osa are required to finely tune Hox expression and these subtle differences are not observed in the endogenous regions of Hox expression in the imaginal discs. A different situation is observed when Ubx and Scr expression is forced out of these regions and then, the requirements of tna and osa genes are revealed by the strong suppression of the ectopic Hox expression when these TrxG genes are inactivated.
Discussion
In this work we studied the role of the TrxG gene tna on Hox gene expression in larval imaginal discs. First, we characterized the production of TnaA isoforms in different tna mutant genetic backgrounds. We also analyzed the Hox loss-of-function phenotypes present in adults with some of these tna mutant backgrounds. We found that the TnaA123 isoform is essential for larval, pupal, and adult survival. In contrast, we found, through mitotic clonal analyses, that tna is not required for individual cell survival in imaginal discs. Neither, we found decreased Hox expression in these tna-defective imaginal cells, although adult animals derived from these experiments do present the already characterized Hox loss-of-function phenotypes. We found that tna-defective function suppresses ectopic Hox expression in imaginal discs in a Pc-defective background. indicating that tna is a fine modulator of Hox gene expression. Below we discuss some possible mechanisms to explain how tna might be implicated in the expression of Hox and other genes.
TnaA isoforms have dedicated functions related to the survival of post-embryonic stages
TrxG genes comprehend a functional diverse group that include among others, regulators of transcriptional initiation and elongation to maintain developmental gene expression (recently reviewed in [1]). tna encodes a group of proteins present in multicellular organisms, with a zinc SP-RING finger, characteristic of a type of SUMO E3-ligases. Besides the inherent complexity of the TrxG genes, biochemical studies are revealing that as tna, some genes of the group, encode several protein isoforms that may have dedicated functions. Up to date, we have detected at least three different protein products (two of them being TnaA130 and TnaA123) that may be the result of the expression from different promoters, alternative splicing, or post-translational modifications ([6] and this work). We have characterized that in embryos, TnaA130 is cytoplasmic, while TnaA123 is mainly nuclear [6]. One of the questions derived from this evidence is to determine whether or not these different isoforms are equivalent in function. In this work, we characterized the effect of reducing the main TnaA proteins (TnaA130 and TnaA123) on the expression of the Hox genes Ubx and Scr in imaginal discs. Through analyses of, first, the lethality shown by tna mutant animals that die since larval and pupal stages, second, the presence of homeotic transformations in the survivors with some of these genotypes, and third, the protein characterization produced by animals with different tna mutant alleles, we were able to make the following observations discarding previous hypotheses. TnaA123 is not a processing product of TnaA130. We can eliminate TnaA130 and still be able to observe TnaA123. TnaA130 does not affect the organism survival significantly, while TnaA123 must be at least detectable, to allow animals to reach the adult stages revealing for the first time a dedicated function for this isoform.
What proved to be more difficult was to determine whether the larval or pupal lethality in these tna mutant animals, was caused by a problem in Hox gene expression in imaginal discs at these developmental stages. Nevertheless, adult cuticles of tna mutant survivors do show Hox loss-of-function phenotypes. Third instar larvae with stronger tna alleles show no detectable TnaA130 and TnaA123 isoforms and die as late larvae or early pupal stages. In that sense, from these experiments we cannot discard the possibility that both, TnaA130 and TnaA123, could be contributing for proper Hox expression.
It is probable that TnaA may be required in two phases during development. In the first phase, the maternal deposition of TnaA might be important to establish the early chromatin landscape for Hox gene expression, in a similar way as the TrxG gene Utx. The Utx protein (Ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat protein X chromosome) is a demethylase of the lysine 27 of histone H3 deposited by the PcG [34, 35]. Animals without both, maternal and zygotic Utx, die as larvae and do not maintain Hox expression, attributed to the fact that some cells cannot initiate the maintenance of Hox gene expression at early stages during the onset of zygotic gene transcription [34, 35]. Animals carrying maternal but no zygotic Utx reach adulthood, have weak loss-of-function phenotypes of diverse Hox, and die just after eclosing, revealing the Utx requirement for viability [34, 35].
Previously, we showed that loss of maternal tna function is completely rescued paternally and loss of both maternal and zygotic functions caused lethality primarily at the third larval instar [5]. It will be important to determine whether depleting TnaA at early stages could result in a reduction in Hox expression. In this work we show that tna is required for viability at larval, pupal and adult stages, and for ectopic Hox expression in imaginal discs. Is tna a gene necessary to initiate the maintenance of Hox gene expression as Utx? It is probable that tna could participate in this mechanism and later on for viability. This would explain the weak Hox phenotypes and the lethality at late developmental stages of tna mutant animals, resembling the ones observed in individuals lacking Utx zygotic expression.
Robust regulatory networks allow proper Hox gene expression that masks fine regulation mediated by TnaA
A central contribution of the present work is that wild-type domains of Hox gene expression are not visibly altered in tna mutant larval imaginal discs, in spite of the adult mutant Hox phenotypes presented by these animals. These results make us consider that first, robust regulatory networks protect proper Hox gene expression and that the role of fine modulators such as TnaA is difficult to analyze in this scenario. Second, tna might be required in particular stages of development that we did not explore here, and third, that the tna mutant cells in imaginal discs that will produce the cuticular adult mutant phenotypes, might be reading very subtle differences in the Hox protein levels that we could not detect by immunostaining.
An argument to explain why the effect of tna mutations can only be observed in ectopic but not on wild-type regions of Hox expression derives from the robustness of regulatory networks. For example, Ubx has several enhancers (and at the end, all Hox genes) that ensure proper Ubx expression in time and space. Some of them are active in haltere discs in redundant spatial patterns which allows to buffer changes in Ubx expression levels due to natural variation [36]. Then it is possible that TnaA modulates the expression of only some components of these regulatory networks in imaginal discs, and when those components fail to function, the other ones "compensate" for Hox gene expression. This compensation mechanism has been observed in experiments studying the effect of loss-of-function alleles of TrxG genes. In these experiments, although the TrxG function is totally removed in mitotic clones, Hox expression (particularly Ubx) is partially restored in a "patchy" way, probably by these compensation mechanisms [34, 37]. Taking in account this situation it makes sense that it was in a Pc-defective background where we were able to observe the suppression by tna mutations of Ubx and Scr ectopic expression in imaginal discs.
That tna suppresses the extra-sex-combs adult cuticular phenotype in Pc-defective individuals caused by derepression of Scr is known [5], but this effect in imaginal discs was analyzed until this work. The suppression effect was observed in imaginal discs harboring the tnaEY22029 allele that affects primarily the production of the TnaA130 isoform (this work), or in adult animals harboring the tna1 allele [5], that lack both TnaA130 and TnaA123 isoforms (this work). This is also similar to the effect of a null brm mutation in the suppression ectopic Scr expression caused by Pc mutants in imaginal discs [2].
To study the developmental window of tna requirement for Hox gene expression, we made clones at different stages of development, finding that tna may be required at early stages (3–4 h AEL). Animals with clones generated at this time did not survive. In contrast, clones generated later (24–48 h AEL) do survive, and adults present a reduced number of sex comb teeth similarly to the Scr loss-of-function phenotype presented by tna hypomorphic and knocked down mutants. This suggests that tna requirements may be biphasic as has been shown for other TrxG genes such as Utx (discussed in the previous section).
Individuals with mutations in RNA polymerase II and transcriptional factors that facilitate initiation [38], or elongation [39] present, as tna mutant individuals, Hox loss-of-function phenotypes. Of these, kismet (kis) is a TrxG gene involved in elongation that was identified because it suppresses ectopic expression of Scr in Pc heterozygotes [40]. kis clones induced during larval development do not show homeotic transformations, meanwhile clones induced earlier at the cellular blastoderm stage, show a reduction on sex comb teeth [41]. Many evidences points towards the possibility that TnaA could be required as a co-factor of the BRAHMA BAP chromatin remodeling complex, but it will also be possible that it targets other components of the general transcriptional machinery.
TnaA on gene expression mediated by the BAP complex, and other general transcription factor targets
The BRAHMA BAP complex is required for the expression of multiple genes at different times of development [42]. TnaA physically interacts with the E2 Ubc9 SUMO-conjugating enzyme and with the subunits of the BRAHMA BAP complex, Osa and Brm [6]. TnaA could be modifying the assembly, the recruitment, or the remodeling function of the complex by stimulating the SUMOylation of one or more BAP subunits to facilitate Hox gene expression at a specific time, or cell-type. In fact, we have shown that TnaA co-localizes sometimes with the BAP subunit Osa in polytene chromosome bands of third instar larvae, but not in others [6], meaning that TnaA is required for function of the BAP complex at some gene targets but not in others, or that the co-localization of TnaA with Osa is transient. On the other side, TnaA may act on targets other than the BRAHMA BAP complex, meaning that epistatic relationships at different levels can contribute to the phenotypes derived from TnaA function(s) (S4 Fig).
Although TnaA itself is not a subunit of the BAP complex, tna defective clones in imaginal discs, resemble the behavior of defective clones in some subunits of the BAP complex. We compared our results particularly with the ones obtained with brm and osa clones, because TnaA physically and genetically interacts with the BAP subunits Brahma and Osa [5, 6]. Kassis et al., (2017) have recently published an excellent summary of results involving the clonal analyses of TrxG genes, and we only note here that germ line and/or somatic clones for mutant brm, osa, Snf5-related 1 (Snr1), and moira (mor) [3, 4, 31, 43, 44], all of them encoding BAP subunits, do not present the same phenotypes, and show requirements at different times of development. For example, analyses of brm clones suggest defects in cell division and in adult peripheral nervous system [43]. osa clones in the germ line produce embryos with segmentation defects [4], and somatic clones in the wing imaginal discs, have defects in venation, and in cell growth and viability [31]. These clones do not present homeotic transformations although adult individuals with hypomorphic brm or osa mutations do have homeotic phenotypes, e. g. [40]. All these evidences, indicates that the BAP complex acts on different gene targets influenced by other factors, including TnaA.
In conclusion, these and other differences and mechanisms, may account for the diverse developmental requirements observed in the clonal analyses of different TrxG genes. As other TrxG genes which have functions in the regulation of genes other than the Hox, tna could have targets not related to Hox expression that are essential for larval or pupal survival. tna epistatic relationships, may involve different TnaA isoforms that could be required for the expression of different gene targets or at diverse times of development (S4 Fig).
If TnaA is influencing BRAHMA BAP complex function, it may act close to the promoter or on regulatory elements such as enhancers where BAP complexes are remodeling chromatin. TnaA may also have other targets than the BAP complex and have a wider target specificity as has been shown for other E3 SUMO ligases (reviewed in [8]). These are questions still unanswered and for example, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments with TnaA antibodies that recognize specific isoforms at different times of development, will be helpful to start to determine the range of action of these TrxG proteins.
Supporting information
(A) tna1/tna1 (GFP-/-), and tna+/tna+ (GFP+/+) clones in a wing disc showing an example of the areas affected by clone-induction. (B) Comparison of the area of 13 tna1/tna1 (GFP-/-), and tna+/tna+ (GFP+/+) adjacent clones from independent events of clone-induction in wing discs. There were no significant (NS) differences between correspondant areas (t-test, P>0.05).
(TIF)
TnaA (red) and Scr (green) immunostaining (red) of tna1/+ or tnaEY22029/+ (upper panel), or tna1/tnaEY22029 (lower panel) leg discs. DNA is stained with Hoescht (left) and images with merged TnaA and Scr signals is shown (extreme right). Note that TnaA level diminishes in tna1/tnaEY22029 leg discs, although the Scr signal looks normal, and 77% of adult tna1/tnaEY22029 animals present a loss-of-function Scr phenotype (Table 2).
(TIF)
osa308 mitotic clones were induced with the Ubx-FLPase. Immunostaining of Osa with the anti-Osa15A8 (dil. 1:200) in a haltere disc where mitotic clones were induced. DNA was stained with Hoechst (blue) to show nuclear presence. RFP (red) marks the osa+/osa- cells that did not recombine (middle red intensity), and the osa+/osa+ cells result of the recombination event (strong red intensity). RFP- marks the osa308/osa308 clone, as corroborated by the absence of Osa immunostaining (green).
(TIF)
Representation of TnaA target proteins that can influence the transcription of different genes. Epistatic relationships, can contribute to the Hox loss-of-function and organism survival phenotypes studied in this work.
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for providing stocks. We thank Jim Kennison for the stock with the tna1 FRT2A chromosome. We also thank Carmen Muñoz, and Laboratorio Nacional de Microscopía Avanzada, Instituto de Biotecnología, UNAM for technical assistance.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funds from Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Programa UNAM-PAPIIT grant IN208316 (http://dgapa.unam.mx/index.php/pf-papiit) to MV. MR-V and AH-B are doctoral students from Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Bioquímicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and have scholarships 307929 and 453402 respectively from CONACyT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Kassis JA, Kennison JA, Tamkun JW. Polycomb and Trithorax group genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 2017;206:1699–1725. 10.1534/genetics.115.185116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tamkun JW, Deuring R, Scott MP, Kissinger M, Pattatuci AM, Kaufman TC, Kennison JA. brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2. Cell. 1992;68:561–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brizuela BJ, Kennison JA. The Drosophila homeotic gene moira regulates expression of engrailed and HOM genes in imaginal tissues. Mech Dev. 1997;65:209–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vázquez M, Moore L, Kennison JA. The trithorax group gene osa encodes an ARID-domain protein that genetically interacts with the Brahma chromatin-remodeling factor to regulate transcription. Development. 1999;126:733–742. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gutierrez L, Zurita M, Kennison JA, Vázquez M. The Drosophila trithorax group gene tonalli (tna) interacts genetically with the Brahma remodeling complex and encodes an SP-RING finger protein. Development. 2003;130:343–354. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Monribot-Villanueva J, Juarez-Uribe A, Palomera-Sánchez, Gutiérrez-Aguiar L, Zurita M, Kennison JA, Vázquez M. TnaA, an SP-RING protein, interacts with Osa, a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex BRAHMA and with the SUMOylation pathway in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gramates LS, Marygold SJ, dos Santos G, Urbano JM, Antonazzo G, Mathews BB, et al. FlyBase at 25: looking to the future. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017;45(D1):D663–D671. 10.1093/nar/gkw1016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Monribot-Villanueva J, Zurita M, Vázquez M. Developmental transcriptional regulation by SUMOylation, an evolving field. Genesis. 2017;55:e23009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rytinki MM, Kaikkonen S, Pehkonen P, Jaaskelainen T, Palvimo JJ. PIAS proteins: pleiotropic interactors associated with SUMO. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:3029–3041. 10.1007/s00018-009-0061-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mann RS, Carroll SB. Molecular mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:592–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.dos Santos G, Schroeder AJ, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Crosby MA, Thurmond J, et al. Flybase: Introduction of the Drosophila melanogaster Release 6 reference genome assembly and large-scale migration of genome annotations. Nucl Ac Res. 2014;43:D690–D697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, Tsang G, et al. The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics. 2004;167:761–81. 10.1534/genetics.104.026427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature. 2007;448:151–6. 10.1038/nature05954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ni JQ, Markstein M, Binari R, Pfeiffer BD, Liu LP, Villalta C, et al. Vector and parameters for targeted transgenic RNA interference in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Methods. 2008;5:49–51. 10.1038/nmeth1146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ito K, Awano W, Suzuki K, Hiromi Y, Yamamoto D. The Drosophila mushroom body is a quadruple structure of clonal units each of which contains a virtually identical set of neurones and glial cells. Development. 1997;124:761–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Capdevila J, Guerrero I. Targeted expression of the signalling molecule Decapentaplegic induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings. EMBO J. 1994;13:4459–4468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haerry TE, Khalsa O, O’Connor MB, Wharton KA. Synergistic signaling by two BMP ligands through the SAX and TKV receptors controls wing growth and patterning in Drosophila. Development. 1998;125:3977–3987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.White RAH, Wilcox M. Protein products of the Bithorax complex in Drosophila. Cell. 1984;39:163–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Glicksman MA, Brower DL. Expression of the Sex combs reduced protein in Drosophila larvae. Dev Biol. 1988;127:113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Treisman JE, Luk A, Rubin GM, Heberlein U. eyelid antagonizes wingless signaling during Drosophila development and has homology to the Bright family of DNA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 1997;11:1949–1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cunningham MD, Gause M, Cheng Y, Noyes A, Dorsett D, Kennison JA, Kassis JA. Wapl antagonizes cohesin binding and promotes Polycomb group silencing in Drosophila. Development. 2012;139:4172–4179. 10.1242/dev.084566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Golic KC, Lindquist SL. The FLP recombinase of yeast catalyzes site-specific recombination in the Drosophila genome. Cell. 1989;59:499–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Christen B, Bienz M. Imaginal disc silencers from Ultrabithorax: evidence for Polycomb response elements. Mech Dev. 1994;48:255–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Emery G, Hutterer A, Berdnik D, Mayer B, Wirtz-Peitz F, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Knoblich JA. Asymmetric Rab11 endosomes regulate delta recycling and specify cell fate in the Drosophila nervous system. Cell. 2005;122:763–773. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beuchle D, Struhl G, Müller J. Polycomb group proteins and heritable silencing of Drosophila Hox genes. Development. 2001;128:993–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blair SS. Imaginal discs. Chapter 10 In: Sullivan W, Ashburner M, Hawley RS, editors. Drosophila Protocols. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000. p. 159–173. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bender W., Akam M, Karch F, Beachy PA, Peifer M, Spierer P, Lewis EB, Hogness DS. Molecular genetics of the Bithorax complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1983;221:23–29. 10.1126/science.221.4605.23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Menéndez J, Perez-Garijo A, Calleja M, Morata G. A tumor-suppressing mechanism in Drosophila involving cell competition and the Hippo pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14651–14656. 10.1073/pnas.1009376107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.White RAH, Wilcox M. Regulation of the distribution of Ultrabithorax proteins in Drosophila. Nature. 1985;318:563–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Weatherbee SD, Halder G, Kim J, Hudson A, Carroll S. Ultrabithorax regulates genes at several levels of the wing-patterning hierarchy to shape the development of the Drosophila haltere. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1474–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Terriente-Félix A, De Celis JF. Osa, a subunit of the BAP chromatin-remodelling complex, participates in the regulation of gene expression in response to EGFR signalling in the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol. 2009;329:350–361. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beachy PA, Helfand SL, Hogness DS. Segmental distribution of bithorax complex proteins during Drosophila development. Nature. 1985;313:545–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lewis EB. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978;276:565–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Copur O, Müller J. The histone H3-J27 demethylase Utx regulates HOX gene expression in Drosophila in a temporally restricted manner. Development. 2013;140:3478–3485. 10.1242/dev.097204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Copur O, Müller J. Histone demethylase activity of Utx is essential for viability and regulation of HOX gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics. 2018;208:633–637. 10.1534/genetics.117.300421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Crickmore MA, Ranade V, Mann RS. Regulation of Ubx expression by epigenetic enhancer silencing in response to Ubx levels and genetic variation. PLoS Genetics. 2009;5:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Klymenko T, Müller J. The histone methyltransferases Trithorax and Ash1 prevent transcriptional silencing by Polycomb group proteins. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:373–377. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gutiérrez L, Merino C, Vázquez M, Reynaud E, Zurita M. RNA polymerase II 140wimp mutant and mutations in the TFIIH subunit XPB differentially affect homeotic gene expression in Drosophila. genesis. 2004;40:58–66. 10.1002/gene.20066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chopra VS, Hong JW, Levine M. Regulation of Hox gene activity by transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2009;19:688–693. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kennison JA, Tamkun JW. Dosage-dependent modifiers of Polycomb and Antennapedia mutations in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:8136–8140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Daubresse G, Deuring R, Moore L, Papoulas O, Zakrajsek I, Waldrip WR, et al. The Drosophila kismet gene is related to chromatin-remodeling factors and is required for both segmentation and segment identity. Development. 1999;126:1175–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Armstrong JA, Papoulas O, Daubresse G, Sperling AS, Lis JT, Scott MP, Tamkun JW. The Drosophila BRM complex facilitates global transcription by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2002;21:5245–5254. 10.1093/emboj/cdf517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Elfring L, Daniel C, Papoulas O, Deuring R, Sarte M, Moseley S, et al. Genetic analysis of brahma: the Drosophila homolog of the yeast chromatin remodeling factor SWI2/SNF2. Genetics. 1998;148:251–265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zraly CB, Marenda DR, Nanchal R, Cavalli G, Muchardt C, Dingwall AK. SNR1 is an essential subunit in a subset of Drosophila BRM complexes, targeting specific functions during development. Dev Biol. 2003;253:291–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(A) tna1/tna1 (GFP-/-), and tna+/tna+ (GFP+/+) clones in a wing disc showing an example of the areas affected by clone-induction. (B) Comparison of the area of 13 tna1/tna1 (GFP-/-), and tna+/tna+ (GFP+/+) adjacent clones from independent events of clone-induction in wing discs. There were no significant (NS) differences between correspondant areas (t-test, P>0.05).
(TIF)
TnaA (red) and Scr (green) immunostaining (red) of tna1/+ or tnaEY22029/+ (upper panel), or tna1/tnaEY22029 (lower panel) leg discs. DNA is stained with Hoescht (left) and images with merged TnaA and Scr signals is shown (extreme right). Note that TnaA level diminishes in tna1/tnaEY22029 leg discs, although the Scr signal looks normal, and 77% of adult tna1/tnaEY22029 animals present a loss-of-function Scr phenotype (Table 2).
(TIF)
osa308 mitotic clones were induced with the Ubx-FLPase. Immunostaining of Osa with the anti-Osa15A8 (dil. 1:200) in a haltere disc where mitotic clones were induced. DNA was stained with Hoechst (blue) to show nuclear presence. RFP (red) marks the osa+/osa- cells that did not recombine (middle red intensity), and the osa+/osa+ cells result of the recombination event (strong red intensity). RFP- marks the osa308/osa308 clone, as corroborated by the absence of Osa immunostaining (green).
(TIF)
Representation of TnaA target proteins that can influence the transcription of different genes. Epistatic relationships, can contribute to the Hox loss-of-function and organism survival phenotypes studied in this work.
(TIF)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.







