Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Oct 29;8:15921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34174-4

Analysis of the Trichuris suis excretory/secretory proteins as a function of life cycle stage and their immunomodulatory properties

Louis-Philippe Leroux 1,2,3, Mohamad Nasr 1,2, Rajesh Valanparambil 2,4, Mifong Tam 2,5, Bruce A Rosa 6, Elizabeth Siciliani 1, Dolores E Hill 7, Dante S Zarlenga 7, Maritza Jaramillo 2,3, Joel V Weinstock 8, Timothy G Geary 1,2, Mary M Stevenson 2,4,5, Joseph F Urban Jr 7, Makedonka Mitreva 6,9, Armando Jardim 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6206011  PMID: 30374177

Abstract

Parasitic worms have a remarkable ability to modulate host immune responses through several mechanisms including excreted/secreted proteins (ESP), yet the exact nature of these proteins and their targets often remains elusive. Here, we performed mass spectrometry analyses of ESP (TsESP) from larval and adult stages of the pig whipworm Trichuris suis (Ts) and identified ~350 proteins. Transcriptomic analyses revealed large subsets of differentially expressed genes in the various life cycle stages of the parasite. Exposure of bone marrow-derived macrophages and dendritic cells to TsESP markedly diminished secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-12p70. Conversely, TsESP exposure strongly induced release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and also induced high levels of nitric oxide (NO) and upregulated arginase activity in macrophages. Interestingly, TsESP failed to directly induce CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells), while OVA-pulsed TsESP-treated dendritic cells suppressed antigen-specific OT-II CD4+ T cell proliferation. Fractionation of TsESP identified a subset of proteins that promoted anti-inflammatory functions, an activity that was recapitulated using recombinant T. suis triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) and nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK). Our study helps illuminate the intricate balance that is characteristic of parasite-host interactions at the immunological interface, and further establishes the principle that specific parasite-derived proteins can modulate immune cell functions.

Introduction

The incidence of immune-mediated disorders in industrialized or “westernized” countries has increased dramatically over the past century13. For instance, cases of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, collectively called inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract4. The incidence of IBD has increased several fold over the past few decades2,5. This general trend in immune-related disorders is concomitant with a significant decrease in the incidence of infectious diseases due to antibiotic use, vaccination, improved hygiene, and overall better socioeconomic conditions13. It is believed that environmental factors have contributed to the increased incidence of these diseases. Alterations in our pattern of exposure to microorganisms and helminths could play a role as well. This concept, dubbed the “hygiene hypothesis”3, is supported by growing epidemiological evidence showing that helminths, multicellular parasitic worms colloquially referred to as “old friends”6, play a protective role by modulating the capacity of the host to mount an aberrantly strong immune response to normal immune challenges, as well as, in part, by altering the gut microbial flora2,79.

Helminths or molecules derived from these organisms are being explored as therapeutic agents to treat immune-related diseases. Clinical trials using the hookworm Necator americanus have shown encouraging results for the treatment of celiac disease10,11. The porcine whipworm Trichuris suis has also gained attention as a potential therapeutic agent7,12.

T. suis is a soil-transmitted swine parasite13. Ova released in the feces undergo embryogenesis and develop into first stage larvae (L1). Upon ingestion by a host, the larvae go through four molts (L2, L3, and L4) and develop into the adult stage (L5) over a period of 40–45 day in the gastrointestinal tract14. Although T. suis is closely related to the human whipworm T. trichiura, ingestion of T. suis ova in most cases leads only to a non-fertile self-limiting colonization in humans15.

Helminth infections polarize host immunity towards a Th2 response, which is required for worm expulsion16, with a concomitant downregulation of Th1-mediated responses, Th17 cells, an increased production of IL-10 and TGF-β by regulatory T (Treg) cells, and the induction of regulatory dendritic cells and alternatively-activated macrophage (AAMΦ) (reviewed in17). A number of studies have reported the characterization of excretory/secretory (ES) products with immunomodulatory functions from various parasitic worms, including Trichinella spiralis1821, Heligmosomoides polygyrus2225, Teladorsagia circumcincta26, Mesocestoides corti27, and N. americanus28. Several studies have also reported similar activity in T. suis ES proteins (TsESP)29,30 and soluble worm extracts3135. Immunomodulation of host immunity has been recently reported using recombinant Ancylostoma caninum tissue inhibitor metalloprotease (AIP-2); this protein promotes expansion of Treg cells, which suppress experimental asthma36. In addition, recombinant serine protease inhibitor (serpin) from Trichinella pseudospiralis alters macrophage polarization37. These studies demonstrate that specific molecules released by helminth parasites can shape host innate and adaptive immune responses. However, the molecular mechanisms driving these events are not clear.

Here, we carried out genome-wide transcriptomic analyses of T. suis larval stages and adult worms to identify differentially expressed genes. Proteomic analysis also was performed to profile ESP proteins released by the different life stages of T. suis. The immunomodulatory properties of TsESP were examined using murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) and macrophages (BMDM). Chromatographic separation of TsESP permitted the identification of immunomodulatory proteins, and recombinant versions of several TsESP proteins were used to confirm immunomodulatory activity.

Results

T. suis genes and excretory/secretory proteins (TsESP) display stage-specific expression

Genomic sequencing of T. suis predicted the presence of 9,832 genes, comparable to T. muris and T. trichura (9,403 and 9,856, respectively), with an average open reading frame length of 2,384 bp (Supplementary Table S1). To assess changes in gene expression as a function of life cycle stage, transcriptomic analysis was performed on 10-, 16-, 21-, 28-day larvae (L2, L3, and L4, respectively) and 42-day adult worm (L5) stages and male or female adult worms and these results were compared to ES products identified by proteomics.

To examine ESP released by T. suis, parasites isolated from infected pigs at 10, 16, 21, 28, and 42 days post-inoculation and cultivated in vitro for up to 72 h. Conditioned medium was collected for protein analysis. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that proteins with MW ranging from ~10–180 kDa were released by 21- and 28-day larvae and adult worms (Fig. 1A). Protein output was notably lower for 10- and 16-day larvae. Proteomic analysis of TsESP isolated from the various life stages collectively identified ~350 proteins using single preparations for 10-, 16-, and 21-day larvae, and three biological replicates for 28-day larvae and adult worms (Supplementary Table S2). Based on Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and biological function, these proteins were classified into 37 groups with structural proteins, glycolytic enzymes, chaperones, proteases, protease inhibitors, and uncharacterized proteins representing the most abundant classes (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, ~20 of the uncharacterized proteins detected in this analysis appeared to be specific to Trichuris and shared very little or no sequence homology with other helminth proteins (Supplementary Table S3). Bioinformatic analyses showed that ~26% of the proteins in the TsESP proteomes contained a signal sequence and ~15% contained 1–4 predicted transmembrane domains.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proteomic analysis of excreted/secreted proteins from various T. suis life cycle stages reveal stage-specific expression. (A) The diversity of T. suis proteins isolated from concentrated serum-free culture medium were analyzed by silver-stained SDS-PAGE prior to subjecting samples to nano LC-MS/MS for protein identification. Full-length scans of SDS-PAGE gels are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. (B) GO term analysis was performed to identify biological function enrichment of proteins identified by LC-MS/MS in early (10-, 16-, 21-day) and 28-day larvae, and adult worms.

Differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 across 3 sample sets consisting of a total of 8 RNA-Seq samples (early larvae: 10-, 16-, 17-, and 21-day; larvae: 28-day; adult, 3 replicates; Supplementary Table S3). This analysis identified, (i) 1,226 genes that were more highly expressed in early larvae and enriched for the GO terms related to ribosome, kinase, and peptidase activity, and less likely than other genes to be T. suis-specific (relative to T. trichiura, T. muris, and 3 host species; 261 genes, P = 1 × 10−7; Supplementary Table S4), (ii) 208 genes were more highly expressed in 28-day larvae and enriched for GO terms related to cell adhesion and signaling, and motor activity, and (iii) 662 genes more highly expressed in adult worms, enriched for GO terms related to kinase activity, toxin responses, and carbohydrate metabolism, and genes likely to be T. suis-specific (226 genes, P = 0.0001; Fig. 2A, Supplementary Tables S3, S4). Gene expression levels corresponding to protein sets detected by proteomics (Fig. 2B) are shown for the early larvae (Fig. 2C), the 28-day larvae (Fig. 2D), and the adult (Fig. 2E) RNA-Seq samples, indicating that highly-expressed genes in each stage are more likely to be detected by proteomic analysis; since these proteins appear to be targeted for release into the extracellular environment. Genes corresponding to proteins detected in early larvae TsESP proteomic studies are more likely to be overexpressed in the early larvae in comparison to other life cycle stages (P = 0.05), as are those corresponding to proteins detected in the 28-day larvae (P = 0.04) and the TsESP (P = 0.02; Fig. 2F, Supplementary Table S3). In sum, the proteomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed life stage-specific expression patterns of ES proteins which might reflect the different developmental requirements of the larval stages and suggest that the host immune response is exposed to a concoction of parasite-derived molecules that varies in composition as the parasite develops.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Trichuris suis transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. (A) Clustering of RNA-Seq samples according to global gene expression patterns (Spearman clustering, average linkage). The number of genes overexpressed in each of 3 sample sets relative to the other sample sets (DESeq2) is indicated. (B) Counts of proteins detected across the proteomics datasets. “TsESP fractions” correspond to proteins identified in pooled fractions obtained by gel permeation (see Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table S5). Average gene expression levels of all genes during (C) early larvae stages, (D) 28-day larvae and (E) adult stages, with genes corresponding to detected proteins indicated. (F) Differential gene expression among detected protein sets. P values represent significant enrichment compared to all genes, according to non-parametric binomial distribution tests.

TsESP inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production and induce IL-10 secretion

TsESP from adult worms was shown to suppress inflammatory responses in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells29. Similarly, TsESP collected from L1 hatched in vitro reduced clinical signs of allergic airway disease in a murine model30. One aim of this study was to directly compare the immunomodulatory effects of TsESP released from larvae and adult worms. To examine these effects, a concentration-dependent experiment was first performed by pre-incubating BMDM with 1–50 µg/mL of TsESP from 28-day larvae and adult worms. The addition of TsESP alone failed to induce TNFα production (Fig. 3A); however, inhibition of TNFα release (>70%; P < 0.001) was observed in BMDM cultures pretreated with adult TsESP as low as 1 µg/mL prior to stimulation with interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and LPS, potent inducer of TNFα. Although a similar concentration-dependent response was observed with 28-day larvae TsESP, higher concentrations (≥25 µg/mL) were required to reduce TNFα secretion (>69%; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3A), which could reflect differences in the levels of specific immunoactive T. suis proteins in these TsESP preparations. In contrast, BMDM pretreated with TsESP alone was sufficient to produce robust levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Fig. 3B). Indeed, the addition of ≥25 µg/mL of 28-day larvae or ≥1 µg/mL of adult worm TsESP triggered a marked increase in IL-10 secretion (P < 0.001) in unstimulated or IFNγ/LPS-stimulated BMDM cultures. Interestingly, TsESP from adult worms elicited significantly greater IL-10 levels compared to 28-day larvae TsESP when tested at equal concentrations. In addition, pretreatment of BMDC with 28-day larvae and adult worm TsESP reduced IL-12p70 secretion by ~80% (P < 0.001) following stimulation of cells with CpG-ODN (Fig. 3C), a TLR9 ligand and known inducer of IL-12p70. Control experiments showed that TsESP treatment alone failed to stimulate production of IL-12p70 by BMDC.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TsESP inhibit pro-inflammatory while inducing anti-inflammatory cytokine release in murine bone marrow-derived immune cells. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) and dendritic cells (BMDC) were pretreated with 28-day larvae or adult worm TsESP for 2 h then stimulated with IFNγ and LPS, CpG-ODN, or left unstimulated. (A,B) TNFα and IL-10 secreted by BMDM, and (C) IL-12p70 secreted by BMDC were measured using sandwich ELISA. (A,B) BMDM were treated with different larvae or adult TsESP concentrations, either 50, 25, 5, or 1 µg/mL, and BMDC cultures were treated with 50 µg/mL TsESP prior to stimulation with CpG-ODN. All samples were prepared in triplicates, and error bars represent standard deviation (SD).

To verify that the immunomodulatory effects were linked to specific protein component(s), TsESP preparations were subjected to extensive proteolysis at an elevated temperature to degrade proteinaceous material. Addition of TsESP to BMDC prior to CpG-ODN stimulation decreased IL-12p70 secretion (Supplementary Fig. S1); however, treatment of 28-day larva or adult worm TsESP with proteinase K38 abolished the capacity of TsESP to inhibit IL-12p70 production following CpG-ODN stimulation. In fact, protease treatment dramatically augmented the stimulatory effect on IL-12p70 production, resulting in significantly higher levels of cytokine secretion as compared to CpG-ODN control cultures. Collectively, these data revealed that TsESP from larvae and adult worms altered cytokine profiles in BMDM and BMDC despite concomitant treatment with exogenous pro-inflammatory stimuli. Moreover, these observations not only confirm the immunosuppressive properties of TsESP on innate immune cells, but also highlight the greater potency of adult worm TsESP as compared to day-28 larvae.

TsESP induce nitric oxide (NO) production and arginase-1 (ARG-1) expression

Parasitic nematodes skew the polarization of macrophages from classically-activated (M1) to alternatively-activated macrophages or suppressive M2 through different mechanisms29,39,40. The general paradigm for macrophage polarization states that M1 produce high levels of NO, while M2 display increased levels of ARG-141,42. Surprisingly, Western blot analyses revealed that treatment of BMDM with 28-day and adult TsESP alone induced expression of nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2 or iNOS) and ARG-1 (Fig. 4A). Concomitant treatment of BMDM with a combination of IFNγ and LPS with or without TsESP resulted in robust upregulation of NOS2; however, the levels were notably higher following treatment with adult TsESP. TsESP from 28-day larvae had a less pronounced effect, regardless of the addition of exogenous cytokines or LPS. In contrast, TsESP treatment alone caused an increase in ARG-1 expression, while concomitant addition of IL-4 and IL-13 with or without IL-10 drastically enhanced its expression in TsESP-treated and control cultures.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

TsESP up-regulate both NOS2 and ARG-1 levels in BMDM. (A) Expression of NOS2 (nitric oxide synthase 2) and ARG-1 (arginase 1) in TsESP-treated BMDM cultures was assessed by Western blotting. BMDM were pretreated with 28-day larvae or adult worms TsESP for 2 h, or left untreated. Cultures were stimulated with IFNγ and LPS, a combination of IL-4 and IL-13 with or without IL-10, or left untreated for 18–20 h. Total amounts of β-actin were used as a loading control. Full-length scans of Western blotting films are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3. (B) Nitric oxide (NO) levels in the culture supernatant were quantified using the Griess reagent and (C) arginase activity was measured in cell lysates. All samples were prepared in triplicate, and error bars represent standard deviation (SD).

To determine if increased NOS2 expression resulted in enhanced NO production, levels of NO were estimated in the culture medium by measuring nitrite concentrations. Treatment of BMDM with either 28-day larvae or adult worm TsESP alone was sufficient to triggered a sharp increase in NO levels (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, NO concentrations were higher in cultures pretreated with TsESP followed by exposure to a combination IFNγ and LPS (P < 0.05), factors known to induce NO production43. Surprisingly, TsESP-induced NO production by BMDM remained elevated despite treatment with IL-4 and IL-13 with or without IL-10 (P < 0.001), both previously shown to inhibit NOS2 transcription4446. Elevated arginase activity was also observed when cells were exposed to TsESP with or without additional IFNγ and LPS treatment (Fig. 4C). Consistent with the increased expression of ARG-1 (Fig. 4A), BMDM treated with IL-4 and IL-13 showed a robust upregulation in arginase activity which was further elevated in the presence of IL-10. Addition of TsESP had a pronounced additive effect with the latter cytokines leading to higher arginase activity as compared to control cultures (P < 0.01) (Fig. 4C). The simultaneous upregulation of NOS2 and ARG-1 suggests that TsESP did not polarize BMDM to an M1 or M2 phenotype, as typically defined, but rather towards a phenotype reminiscent of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)47 with potential suppressive abilities.

TsESP-polarized myeloid cells suppress antigen-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation

Given the phenotype observed with TsESP-treated myeloid cells, we sought to determine if these cells could alter antigen-specific expansion of CD4+ T cells. Co-cultures of BMDC pulsed with OVA323–339 peptide and OT-II CD4+ T cells induced robust T cell division as shown by the dilution of the CFSE signal (Fig. 5A), which corresponded to a ~60% increase in T cell proliferation (Fig. 5B). However, treatment of BMDC with adult worm or larval TsESP prior to co-culturing caused a marked and significant inhibition of OT-II CD4+ T cell division (~40% reduction in cell proliferation as compared to medium control) after a 72 h incubation; Fig. 5A,B). Determination of cytokine levels in the supernatants revealed high levels of IL-10 in cultures containing BMDC pretreated with adult worm TsESP, while supernatants from the medium control and BMDC pretreated with 28-day larvae TsESP contained only minimal levels of IL-10 (Fig. 5C). A similar analysis showed that cultures containing BMDC pretreated with TsESP either from adult worms or day-28 larvae had increased levels of IFNγ and TNFα (Fig. 5D,E).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

TsESP-polarized bone marrow-derived cells suppress antigen-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation. BMDC were pretreated for 2 h with either 28-day larvae or adult TsESP, or left untreated (i.e. medium only), then co-cultured with CD4+ T cells in the presence of 1 nM OVA323–339 peptide. (A) Representative profiles of CFSE dilution of gated CD4+ T cells are shown, while proliferation was measured and plotted with five biological replicates for each condition. (C–E) Levels of IL-10, IFNγ, and TNFα in supernatants harvested from co-cultures were determined by ELISA. (F) CD4+ T cells harvested at 48 h from co-cultures were treated with Brefeldin A for the last 4 h of incubation and stained for intracellular IL-10, IFNγ, and TNFα. Histograms represent the staining of TNFα and IL-10 from the CD4+IFNγ+ cell population. CD11c+ BMDC had negligible staining for ICS for any of the cytokines (data not shown).

To assess which cells in BMDC:OT-II CD4+ T cell co-cultures released cytokines (IL-10, IFNγ, TNFα), intracellular cytokine staining was performed after a 48 h incubation. Cells were stained for CD11c or CD4 cell surface markers to differentiate BMDC and T cells, respectively, and doubly stained to detect intracellular levels of IFNγ and IL-10 or IFNγ and TNFα. Dual intracellular staining of T cell populations following stimulation with OVA peptide presented by BMDC showed that 2.4–3.5% of CD4+ T cells expressed IFNγ (Fig. 5F). Co-staining of the latter population for TNFα confirmed that ~2.0% of the CD4+ T cells in the medium control and TsESP-treated cultures expressed IFNγ and TNFα. The frequency of IFNγ+ and TNFα+ CD4+ T cells increased to ~3.0% in cultures treated with TsESP. CD4+ T cells expressing both IFNγ and IL-10 were detected at a frequency of ~1.7% in the medium control and 28-day larvae TsESP while the frequency of IFNγ+ IL-10+ CD4+ T cells increased to ~2.8% in the adult worm TsESP-treated cultures, which may account for the notably higher level of IL-10 detected in the culture supernatant following pretreatment of BMDC with adult TsESP (Fig. 5E).

It was previously reported that exposure to ESP from other intestinal nematodes H. polygyrus and T. circumcincta induced differentiation of naïve splenocytes into CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cells26, an effect we did not observe with TsESP treatment (Supplementary Fig. S2). Flow cytometric analyses showed that the expression of the CD25 and FoxP3 markers in concanavalin (Con) A-stimulated splenocytes did not differ when control cultures (4.1 ± 1.4%) were compared to TsESP-treated cultures (28-day larvae 5.3 ± 1.3%; adult worm 5.0 ± 1.5%). In contrast, ESP from adult H. polygyrus worms induced a significant increase (14.1 ± 2.7%, P < 0.05) in de novo CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T cells, as previously reported26. Overall, these data suggest that the suppressive effects of TsESP are mediated by TsESP-polarized myeloid cells that limit anti-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation without directly inducing Treg cells.

Fractionation of adult worm TsESP

To identify immunomodulatory proteins in adult TsESP, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractionation was performed to separate proteins on the basis of size. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) revealed that the majority of proteins eluted with apparent MW ranging from ~17–200 kDa (Fig. 6A). To identify bioactive components, aliquots of the GPC fractions were used to treat BMDM cultures followed by IFNγ/LPS stimulation. Levels of IL-10 and TNFα in the supernatant (Fig. 6B) and arginase activity in cells were subsequently quantified (Fig. 6C). TNFα inhibition activity was detected in multiple GPC fractions; however, the most striking decrease was observed in fractions 17–19, 20–21, and 28–31 (Fig. 6B). A similar analysis showed that fractions 16–23 (MW ~ 160–670 kDa) and 28–31 (~10–35 kDa) induced IL-10. Arginase activity was most strongly detected with fractions 18–21 and 28–30 (Fig. 6C), which coincided with IL-10-inducing fractions.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Fractionation of adult TsESP and identification of immunomodulatory protein candidates. (A) Approximately 4.0 mg of adult worm TsESP were fractioned by gel permeation chromatography (HPLC). PBS was used as a mobile phase, and 1 mL fractions were collected. Eluting proteins were monitored at 280 nm wavelength. A mixture of proteins of known molecular weights were ran subsequently to allow the estimation of protein sizes. (B,C) BMDM cultures were treated with ~10 µg of protein collected from each fraction (from Fraction #8 to #40) for 4 h, then stimulated with IFNγ and LPS for 18–20 h. (B) Levels of TNFα and IL-10 in the supernatant was quantified by a sandwich ELISA assay, and (C) arginase activity was measured in cell lysates.

To identify proteins linked to the immunomodulatory activity, the three pools of GPC fractions with highest bioactivity (16–18, 19–21, and 28–30) were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Collectively, 33 proteins were detected across the three GPC pools (Supplementary Table S5). With the exception of ferritin, Sm ribonucleoprotein, aspartyl aminopeptidase, and α-mannosidase 2C1, all other proteins were previously observed in the crude 28-day larvae or adult worm proteomes. In fractions 16–18, angiotensin-converting enzyme was the only protein also detected in the crude 28-day larvae and adult worm proteomes. The bulk of proteins exhibiting TNFα inhibitory and IL-10 stimulating activity were in fractions 19–21; although several of these proteins were also found in fractions 28–30. Among these, there were a number of proteases, glycolytic enzymes, kinases, dehydrogenases, and the iron and cholesterol binding proteins, ferritin and the Niemann-Pick C1 protein, respectively. A number of uncharacterized proteins were also detected, with proteins D918-01198 and D918-10108 being specific to Trichuris spp. (Supplementary Table S5).

Since the amount of protein found in each of the GPC bioactive fractions was limiting, it precluded the possibility of performing additional chromatographic separation steps to obtain single highly purified protein components. Therefore, we generated recombinant versions of several T. suis proteins, including triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK), and a small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (SNRP), in an E. coli expression system to assess and validate their immunomodulatory activity. These three candidates were selected for initial studies since they are found in ESPs from multiple helminths. Bioinformatic analysis showed that T. suis SNRP, TPI, and NDK have predicted MWs of 8.0, 27, and 26 kDa and share ~83, 61, and 75% sequence identity with their mammalian homologues, respectively. An interesting feature of the T. suis NDK is a 76 amino acid C-terminal extension that is absent from the mammalian homologue, but shares ~40% sequence identity with autophagy related protein 2 from Trichinella. Treatment of BMDM with recombinant TPI and NDK inhibited IFNγ/LPS-induced TNFα secretion in a concentration-dependent manner (25 to ~6 µg/mL for TPI, and 25 to ~3 µg/mL for NDK) (Fig. 7A). In contrast, SNRP had no inhibitory activity at the tested concentrations, but instead appeared to potentiate TNFα production.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

T. suis recombinant proteins TPI and NDK proteins inhibit TNFα secretion and elicit anti-inflammatory signaling in BMDM. (A) BMDM cultures were treated with different concentrations of recombinant T. suis proteins TPI, NDK, or putative protein 505 (two-fold dilutions starting at 25 µg/mL down to ~3 µg/mL) of medium only (i.e. “Control”) for 4 h, then stimulated with IFNγ and LPS for 18–20 h. Native, unfractionated adult TsESP were included for comparison. Levels of TNFα were measured by ELISA. Samples were prepared in technical triplicates and results are representative of two independent experiments. (B) BMDM cultures were treated with adult worms TsESP (50 µg/mL), recombinant TPI, NDK (both 25 µg/mL), or left untreated for 4 h. Cultures were stimulated with IFNγ and LPS or left untreated for 18–20 h. Phosphorylation of STAT3 (Y705) and expression of C/EBPβ, NFIL-3, and TTP were assessed by Western blotting. Total amounts of β-actin were used as a loading control. Full-length scans of Western blotting films are shown in Supplementary Fig. S3.

To examine the cellular mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of TPI and NDK, we assessed by Western blots the phosphorylation (activation) and expression of different mediators. Specifically, we monitored the phosphorylation of STAT3 and the expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ), two transcription factors critical in MDSC functions47. Treatment of BMDM with adult TsESP, TPI, or NDK without additional stimulation led to the phosphorylation of STAT3 (Y705) and induced expression of C/EBPβ) (Fig. 7B). Also, expression of nuclear factor interleukin-3 regulated (NFIL-3), a target gene of STAT3-mediated transcription and a suppressor of Il12b transcription48, was induced upon exposure to TsESP. Of note, STAT3, C/EBPβ, and NFIL3 are all important transcription mediators driving the expression of numerous anti-inflammatory genes4851. In addition, a marked increase was observed in the expression of TTP (tristetraprolin), a protein which binds specific mRNAs, such as TNFα and IFNγ52, and targets them for degradation. Of note, native TsESP elicited a stronger response for these targets, suggesting that several proteins in this mixture contribute to the effect. In sum, the identification of potential protein candidates supports the concept that specific parasite-derived molecules can be linked to the immunomodulatory properties of TsESP and may promote the immunosuppressive functions of myeloid cells.

Discussion

Published reports show that parasitic helminths can profoundly modulate immune responses of infected hosts, generally eliciting a Th2-biased response16, promoting the production of anti-inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-10, IL-25, IL-33, PGE2, TGF-β, TSLP)24,5359, and inducing the expansion of regulatory dendritic cells39 and AAMΦ40. This skewed immune response is in part due to the immunomodulatory properties of ES products from these parasites1826,2830. In this study, we have focused on proteins released by T. suis; however we recognized that these helminths release other small metabolic products such as PGE2 which are capable of inhibiting pro-inflammatory responses59.

Our results with TsESP are largely in agreement with two previous reports, the first of which demonstrated the anti-inflammatory properties of adult TsESP on intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and monocyte-derived dendritic cells29, and the second, which showed the immunosuppressive properties of L1 larvae TsESP in vitro and in a murine model of allergic airway disease30. Our study extends these findings by revealing that TsESP from adult worms is more active than TsESP derived from L4 larvae (28-day), which may be linked to stage-specific expression profiles and/or the relative abundance of bioactive proteins, as suggested by the results of our transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. These observations offer insights into changes that occur between the parasite and the host immune system as the larvae develop into adult worms. The subtle yet significant differences in immunomodulatory abilities of different life stages could represent important considerations in the design of a novel therapeutic tool for addressing pathologies associated with immune-mediated disorders.

Since the time that this work was performed, an additional two T. suis genome assemblies (female and male) have been published60 (Supplementary Table S1). These two genome assemblies were slightly larger than our assembled genome (71 mbp and 74 mbp for female and male respectively, vs 64 mbp for our assembly) and were annotated with more protein coding genes (14,261 and 14,436, vs 9,832 genes). However, our protein coding gene count was comparable to other published Trichuris species (9,403 for T. muris and 9,856 for T. trichiura61), and our genome completion estimation using BUSCO62 indicated that our genome was 95% complete similar to the 94.7% completion rate for the other two published versions (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that we are capturing the complete functional gene set with fewer genes. Furthermore, deduced protein sequence similarity matching using NCBI BLASTp (v2.6.0+) indicated that 90.7% and 90.5% of our genes had matches (E ≤ 10−5) in the previously published female and male T. suis genomes, respectively60, while the two genomes had 94.5% of genes matching each other. The higher gene count in the published genomes may be the result of gene fragmentation resulting from having more than 10-fold as many contigs in the genome assembly (Supplementary Table S1). Here, we identify biological functions enriched among early larvae (kinases, peptidases, T. suis-specific gene functions), 28-day larvae (cell adhesion, motor activity), and adult stage T. suis (toxin responses, carbohydrate metabolism, T. suis-specific function) using DESeq2 to identify differentially-expressed genes (Supplementary Table S4). The previous genome paper60 also had RNA-Seq datasets from L1/L2, L3, L4 and adult stages (in addition to tissue-specific datasets from the male and female posterior body, and the stichosome) but did not perform a similar statistical differential analysis for enrichment for comparison to our results. Hence, our study supports but also complements previous reports by assessing stage-specific gene expression profiles and enrichment of specific biological functions, thus giving greater insight into the developing worms.

Although CpG and LPS (TLR9 and TLR4 ligands, respectively), and IFNγ can trigger distinct signaling events, they also activate common signaling cascades suck as MAPK (e.g. p38, ERK) and increase immune-related gene expression by enhancing the activity of different transcription factors including NFκB and AP-163,64. In our study, we have observed that TsESP treatment was able to inhibit both CpG-mediated IL-12p70 and IFNγ/LPS-mediated TNFα production by innate immune cells. While it remains to be established if the parasite-derived molecules target multiple independent pathways or common downstream effectors of TLR4, TLR9, and IFNγR, our results demonstrate the potency of these molecules to inhibit inflammation without being limited to a single stimulus. This observation is an important consideration especially in the context of treatments of immune-mediated disorders, which are often caused by various molecular cues4. In addition, our observations offer valuable clues as to potential signaling events affected which could direct future studies.

Furthermore, our study revealed an interesting effect of TsESP on the polarization of primary macrophages and dendritic cells. Macrophages treated with the parasite products adopted several features akin to myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), such as the simultaneous expression of NOS2 and ARG1, production of IL-10, higher levels of phosphorylated STAT3, and expression of C/EBPβ (reviewed in47). Moreover, TTP, a potent repressor of translation of inflammatory mediators, can be constitutively expressed by tumor-associated macrophages (TAM)65 similar to our findings in BMDM treated with TsESP. Another transcription factor induced by TsESP treatment was NFIL3; this protein is important in colonic macrophages to limit inflammation upon exposure to enteric microbiota48. Interestingly, Nfil3−/− mice develop microbiota-dependent colitis66. The expansion of MDSC during infections with Taenia crassiceps67, H. polygyrus68,69, and Schistosoma japonicum70 has been reported; however, evidence for the involvement of ES products in the generation of immunosuppressive myeloid cell subsets in this context would be an important addition to our understanding of host-pathogen interactions. In addition, TsESP-treated dendritic cells display the ability to inhibit antigen-specific CD4+ T cell expansion47. Curiously, co-culture of TsESP-treated BMDC and OT-II CD4+ T cells stimulated with OVA peptide generated IFNγ+ IL10+ double-positive CD4+ T cells. This phenotype has been observed in leishmaniasis71 and toxoplasmosis72. The underlying mechanism involves an early phase of IFNγ to eradicate the pathogen followed by a regulatory phase or “cytokine switch” during which IL-10 is produced by the same IFNγ+ cells, essentially leading to a negative feedback loop to limit inflammation73. Hence, TsESP could modulate CD4+ T cell responses indirectly by altering the phenotype of antigen presenting cells.

Although there is an unequivocal propensity of TsESP to inhibit inflammatory responses, the identity of the proteins with immune-altering activity has remained largely undetermined for T. suis and other nematodes. Using a combination of chromatographic techniques and proteomic analyses, we demonstrated that subsets of TsESP display immunomodulatory capabilities that recapitulate to a large extent effects observed with native TsESP. Three candidates were chosen based on their presence within biologically active GPC fractions and previous literature reports of orthologs in ESP from many other parasitic helminths, namely TPI and NDK, which displayed immunosuppressive activity, and SNRP, which did not have the effects seen with TPI and NDK mimicking the bioactivity observed in native TsESP. TPI is a ubiquitously expressed enzyme that catalyzes the aldose-ketone isomerization of dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a key reaction in the glycolysis pathway. TPI has been previously identified as the most abundantly secreted protein by Brugia malayi, the causative agent of human lympathic filariasis, and is required for optimal fecundity74. TPI is also highly secreted by other parasites, such as the nematodes Meloidogyne incognita75 and Haemonchus contortus76, and the trematode Schistosoma mansoni77. It remains unclear, however, how this enzyme alters the phenotype of host immune cells. Evidence for a moonlighting function of TPI has been reported for Trichomonas vaginalis78 and the fungal pathogen Paracoccidioides brasiliensis79, where surface-associated TPI interacts with extracellular matrix components such as laminin and fibronectin to facilitate adhesion and invasion. Although this alternate function for TPI does not address molecular mechanisms implicated in immunomodulation, it does suggest that uncharacterized and perhaps unexpected roles for such enzymes in the infection process.

The cytoplasmic enzyme NDK catalyzes the exchange of a terminal phosphate from a donor NTP to an acceptor NDP to produce a triphosphate, a necessary step for the synthesis of DNA and RNA. Interestingly, NDK also is released into the extracellular milieu by parasites and other microbes and contributes to the inhibition of innate immune responses80. It is possible that the T. suis NDK exerts its effect by degrading extracellular ATP (eATP) to reduce purinergic signaling through P2X7 receptors and inflammasome-mediated responses, preventing release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as observed with other pathogens80,81. Moreover, eATP levels affect macrophage polarization; higher levels of this eATP favor M1 polarization82,83.

Despite their striking effects on innate immune cells, how these recombinant proteins or other proteins in TsESP exert immunomodulatory effects remains unclear. It is tempting to postulate that a mechanism involving the cross-linking of surface molecules/receptors that triggers a signaling cascade may lead to the internalization of T. suis proteins. For instance, C-type lectin receptors (CLR), pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on DCs and macrophages, are involved in the recognition and internalization of carbohydrates and polypeptides84. The Mycobacterium-derived mannose-capped lipoarabinomannans (ManLAMs) bind to the mannose receptor DC-SIGN to trigger an inhibitory signal that blocks LPS-induced activation and suppress dendritic cell functions and IL-12 secretion85,86. Helminths express glycosylated molecules, several of which bind to innate receptors and modulate host immune responses87. Schistosome soluble egg antigens (SEA), a complex mixture of glycosylated proteins and lipids, are internalized by dendritic cells through different CLR, namely DC-SIGN, MGL, and the mannose receptor, and to co-localize with MHC-II-positive lysosomal compartments88. It will also be interesting to determine if similar mechanisms are implicated in the response to TsESP exposure, but also how these molecules block TLR ligand-mediated and cytokine-induced inflammatory responses.

Understanding the nature of the molecular dialogue between the parasite and its host that drives immune modulation could lead to the development of new strategies for combating autoimmune disorders. A focused and targeted approach in the treatment of these debilitating diseases using parasite-derived molecules will circumvent the disadvantages associated with the inoculation of patients with live organisms.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of T. suis life cycle stages

Pig (Sus scrofa) management and handling procedures were approved by the Beltsville Area Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol #10-011) following Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) guidelines. Mixed-sex pigs (crossbred: Landrace × Yorkshire × Poland China) of approximately 3 months of age were inoculated with a single dose of infective T. suis eggs (2 × 104 eggs/pig), as previously described9. Swine were housed in stalls with a nonabsorptive concrete floor surface, two pigs per pen, and had access to water and feed ad libitum. The diet was a corn-soybean formulation containing 16% crude protein and vitamins and minerals that exceeded National Research Council guidelines9. Following euthanasia, T. suis larval stages and adult worms were collected at various time points, between day 10 to 42 post-inoculation from the cecum and proximal colon. Larvae and adult worms were collected and pooled from 2 to 9 infected pigs (average of 4–5 pigs for each parasite stage, for each infection trials). Larval stages were isolated after pig tissue was washed free of adherent fecal material with warm tap water and then incubated for 3 h in PBS. Adult worms were manually removed from the tissue using fine forceps. 10- and 16-day larvae were freed of debris by floatation over a 40% Percoll; 21- and 28-day larvae were collected by swirling around a curved Pasteur pipette; 42-day adult worms (L5) were picked individually free of debris. Worms were washed five times, for 10 min each, by sedimentation in wash buffer (Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) pH 7.2 supplemented with 500 U/mL penicillin, 500 µg/mL streptomycin, 1.25 µg/mL amphotericin B, and 350 µg/mL chloramphenicol) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) at a ratio of 10 parts wash buffer to 1 part worms. Pigs were free of other helminth infections as measured by routine screening of the herd and the absence of worms in the intestinal contents and liver lesions at necropsy.

Production of T. suis excretory-secretory protein (TsESP)

Parasites were incubated in wash buffer O/N at 37 °C, 10% CO2 in air then resuspended in culture medium (DMEM with 4.5 g/mL glucose, L-glutamine, and sodium bicarbonate at pH 7.2, 250 U/mL penicillin, 250 µg/mL streptomycin, 0.625 µg/mL amphotericin B, and 400 µg/mL chloramphenicol) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a concentration of ~20 adult worms/mL or ~500 larvae/mL and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Culture medium was replaced every 24 h for a period up to 72 h, then worms were collected by filtration using a Whatman filter paper. Conditioned culture media were sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm Amicon bottle top filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA). TsESP were concentrated under nitrogen pressure (55 psi) using a stirred ultrafiltration chamber (Amicon model 8400, Millipore) with a Millipore Ultracel 3 kDa MWCO ultrafiltration disc. Protein concentrations were measured using the RCDC assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), according to the manufacturer’s specifications, and the samples were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C.

Genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Genomic DNA (gDNA) from the different T. suis life stages (mixed sex) was extracted and purified using the kit E.Z.N.A. SQ Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA), and the yield and purity assessed by Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Whole-genome shotgun fragment and paired-end sequencing libraries (3 kb and 8 kb) were constructed from the gDNA, as described89, and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq. 2000 platform (392x). Linker and adapter sequences were trimmed, and cleaned reads were assembled using ALLPATHS-LG90. A repeat library was generated using Repeatmodeler (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler.html), rRNA genes were identified using RNAmmer (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/cgi-bin/nph-sw_request?rnammer), and tRNAs were identified with tRNAscan-SE91. Non-coding RNAs were identified by sequence homology search of the Rfam database (http://selab.janelia.org/software.html). Repeats and predicted RNAs were then masked using RepeatMasker92. Repeat count data are available in Supplementary Table S6. A total of 9,832 protein coding genes as predicted using a combination of the ab initio programs Snap93, Fgenesh94, and Augustus95, and the MAKER annotation pipeline96. A consensus gene set based on these predictions was generated using a hierarchical approach developed at The Genome Institute97 and gene product naming was determined by BER (http://ber.sourceforge.net). Transmembrane domains and classical secretion peptides were predicted using Phobius98,99, and non-classical secretion signals were predicted using SecretomeP100. Proteins were assigned to KEGG orthologous groups, pathways and pathway modules using KEGGscan101 with KEGG release 68102. Associations with InterPro protein domains and Gene Ontology (GO) classifications were inferred using InterProScan103105. All available functional annotations are available in Supplementary Table S3. Functional enrichment of GO terms related to particular subsets of proteins was calculated using FUNC106 with an adjusted P-value cutoff of 0.01 (Supplementary Table S4). Orthologous protein families were defined using the OrthoMCL package107 with an inflation factor 1.5, based on the complete deduced proteomes from the T. suis genome annotation, and of T. muris, T. trichiura61, and host species Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, and Sus scrofa (retrieved from Genbank, January 2014)108.

Transcriptome sequencing

Paired-end cDNA libraries were generated as previously described using standard protocols109 from mRNA preserved from freshly isolated T. suis parasites from different life stages (2 replicates for each larval stage and 3 for adult worms). Adapter trimming, sequence quality trimming, length filtering, complexity filtering, and contaminant filtering were performed as previously described110. The remaining high-quality RNA-Seq reads were aligned to the genome assembly using Tophat2111 (version 2.0.8, default parameters). The mean number of reads associated with each feature for the replicates was determined using HTSeq-Count112 (Supplementary Tables S3, S4). Differentially expressed genes were predicted using DESeq2 (version 1.4.5)113 with an adjusted P-value cutoff of 0.05. All processed gene expression data and differential expression data is available in Supplementary Table S3.

Liquid chromatography-coupled tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed at the Proteomics Platform of the Quebec Genomics Centre (Quebec City, QC, Canada). Proteins were solubilized in 25 µL 50 mM NH4HCO3, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2 mM DTT, and 0.9 mM iodoacetamide, and digested with sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) for 16 h at 37 °C. Peptides were concentrated using a Stage tip (C18), vacuum-dried, and resuspended in 5 µL 0.1% formic acid, then resolved by reverse-phase (RP) on self-packed PicoFrit column (New Objective, Woburn, MA) packed with Jupiter (5.0 u, 300 Å C18, 15 cm × 0.075 mm internal diameter) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) with a linear gradient from 2 to 50% Solvent B (ACN, 0.1% formic acid) over 90 min, at 300 nL/min. Full survey spectra were collected (400 to 2,000 m/z) and analyzed on a 5600 mass spectrometer using Analyst (version 1.6) (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA), and the seven most intense ions were submitted to fragmentation. Spectra were searched against a database of predicted tryptic peptides derived from the predicted protein sequences translated from the T. suis genome annotation using MASCOT version 2.3.02 (Matrix Science, London, UK). MS data was analyzed with Scaffold (version 4.0.1, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) with a peptide confidence of 95.0% with a minimum of 1 peptide in each sample for a given life-stage.

Murine bone marrow-derived immune cell cultures

BMDC were generated from 6–8 week-old female C57BL/6 mice. Mice were maintained in the animal facility at the Lyman-Duff Medical Building (McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada) according to the McGill University Animal Care Committee (Permit #4543). This protocol respects the procedures on good animal practice provided by the Canadian Council for animal care. BMDC were obtained by differentiating precursor cells as previously described22. Bone marrow cells (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) were differentiated for 7 days in complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine 20 µg/mL gentamycin, and 50 µM β-ME) (Wisent, St-Bruno, QC, Canada) enriched with 20% Ag8.653-conditioned culture medium. CD11c+ BMDC were purified by positive selection using anti-CD11c MACS beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Purity was assessed routinely by flow cytometry, monitoring CD11c surface expression. BMDM were obtained by differentiating precursor murine bone marrow cells (5 × 106) resuspended in culture medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamate, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, 2.5% HEPES, 55 µM β-ME, 1 mM sodium pyruvate) (Wisent) supplemented with 30% L929 fibroblast-conditioned culture medium for 7 days114. Purity was assessed routinely by flow cytometry, monitoring CD11b and F4/80 co-expression.

Cell culture treatments and stimulation

BMDM and BMDC were plated at 2 × 105 or 2 × 106 cells/well in 96 or 6-well plates, respectively, and cultures were treated with TsESP or recombinant proteins or left untreated for 4 h. Fresh medium was added with or without CpG-ODN (1 µM final) (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA) to BMDC or recombinant murine IFNγ (BioSource, Carlsbad, CA) and LPS from Salmonella enterica (Sigma-Aldrich) (100 U/mL and 10 ng/mL final, respectively), IL-4 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and IL-13 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) (both 10 ng/mL final), or with IL-4, IL-13, and IL-10 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) (all 10 ng/mL final) to BMDM, and cultures were incubated for 18–20 h.

ELISA

Secreted cytokines in culture supernatants from treated BMDC or BMDM cultures were measured by sandwich ELISA. Plates were coated with the following capture antibodies: anti- IL-10 (clone JES5–16E3), anti-IL-12p35 (clone C18.2), anti-TNFα (clone 1F3F3D4) (eBioscience), anti-IFNγ (clone R4–6A2), and anti-IL-4 (clone 11B11) (BioLegend). Wells were blocked with PBS 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) with 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature (RT), then culture supernatants were added to wells and incubated O/N at 4 °C. On the following day, the following biotinylated antibodies were used: anti-IL-10 (clone JES5-2A5), anti-IL-12/IL-23p40 (clone C17.8), anti-TNFα (clone XT3/XT22) (eBioscience), anti-IFNγ (clone XMG1.2), and anti-IL-4 (clone BVD6–24G2) (BioLegend). Concentrations were calculated from standard curves generated using linear regression analysis of data obtained from serial dilutions using recombinant murine IL-10, IL-12p70, TNFα (eBioscience), IL-4, and IFNγ (BioLegend) standards.

Western blot analysis

Treated cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X 100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with phosphatase and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktails (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation and protein concentration measured using the BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked and probed with the primary antibodies: anti-NOS2 (eBioscience), anti-arginase-1 (Arg1) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-phospho-STAT3 (Y705), anti-STAT3, anti-C/EBPβ, anti-TTP, anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA), or anti-NFIL-3 (BioLegend) and goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse (Sigma-Aldrich) IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked antibodies. Proteins were visualized using the Clarity ECL Western blotting substrate (Bio-Rad).

Nitric oxide (NO) production and arginase enzymatic activity

Culture supernatants were collected and NO production was determined using the Griess reagent according to manufacturer’s specifications (Biotium, Hayward, CA), while cells were kept to test for arginase activity (see below). Absorbance was measured at 548 nm with a Synergy H4 (Biotek) plate reader, and nitrite concentrations were calculated using linear regression obtained from serial dilution of nitrite standards. Arginase activity was measured using the colorimetric reaction between α-ISPP (Sigma-Aldrich) and urea, a technique adapted from previously published work115. Color development was measured at 540 nm using a Synergy H4 (Biotek) plate reader, and arginase enzymatic activity was calculated using values obtained from urea standards and expressed as milli-enzyme units per million cells (mU/106 cells).

Flow cytometry staining

Following experiment-specific treatments, cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS with 0.1% BSA). When required, cells were first stained with fixable viability dye (eFluor780; San Diego, CA). Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 (Fcγ III/II) (clone 2.4G2; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), then stained with the following antibodies, according to the experiment, on ice for 30 min: PerCP-eFluor710-anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5), and PE-anti-mouse-CD11c (clone N418) (eBioscience). For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using FoxP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience), according to the manufacturer’s specifications, then stained with the following antibodies: FITC-anti-mouse-IFNγ (clone XMG1.2), APC-anti-mouse-TNFα (clone MP6-XT22), APC-anti-mouse-IL-10 (clone JES5.16E3) (eBioscience). UltraComp eBeads (eBioscience) were stained with each fluorochrome in the panel of markers as compensation controls. Samples were acquired using either a BD FACSCalibur or Fortessa (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).

In vitro suppression assay

Purified CD11c+ BMDC (5 × 104/100 µL) were pretreated with T. suis ESP (50 µg/mL) for 2 h or medium alone. Splenic CD4+ cells from OT-II mice were negatively selected using a mouse CD4+ T cell isolation kit (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC) and labeled with CFSE, as previously described116. CFSE-labeled CD4+ T cells (2.5 × 105/100 µL) were added to CD11c+ BMDC cultures (i.e. T cell-to-BMDC ratio of 5:1) and stimulated with 1 nM OVA323–339 peptide (AnaSpec, Fremont, CA). After 72 h, cells were harvested and processed for flow cytometry analysis; CFSE dilution was determined in gated CD4+ T cells. Supernatants from the co-cultures were collected and assayed for IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-10 by sandwich ELISA using standard protocols and DuoSet ELISA antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS)

Co-cultures of BMDC and OT-II CD4+ T cells containing CD11c+ BMDC pretreated with larvae or adult worm T. suis ESP, or left untreated for 2 h and then 5 × 106 purified OT-II CD4+ T cells were added in the presence of 1 nM OVA323–339 peptide (Anaspec). Cells were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 48 h, and Brefeldin A (eBioscience) was added during the last 4 h of culture to inhibit cytokine secretion. Non-adherent T cells were harvested and adherent BMDC were collected using 1X TrypLE (Invitrogen); cells were processed separately for flow cytometry analysis.

Gel permeation chromatography

Gel permeation chromatography was performed on a Beckman Coulter System Gold (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) equipped with a Superdex 200 gel permeation chromatography column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA) equilibrated with endotoxin-free PBS (pH 7.4–7.5). Approximately ~4.0 mg of adult worm TsESP was injected onto the column and fractionated at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, and 1 mL fractions were collected. Eluting proteins were monitored at 280 nm wavelength. The column was calibrated using a standard protein mixture containing thyroglobulin (670 kDa), bovine IgG (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa), equine myoglobin (17 kDa), and vitamin B12 (1.35 kDa) (Bio-Rad).

Recombinant protein expression

Genes encoding the recombinant T. suis triosephosphate isomerase (TPI, D918-00560), nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK, D918-00383), and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (SNRP, D918-00505) 505 were obtained as a synthetic gene from GenScript cloned into expression vector pET15b vector (Millipore). E. coli ER2566 (New England Biolabs) transformed with the pET15b-TPI, pET15b-NDK, or pET15b-505 vectors were grown at 37 °C and protein expression was induced with 15 mM benzyl alcohol and 0.2 mM IPTG. Bacterial cell pellets were resuspended in PBS (pH 7.2) and cells were lysed by sonication, NaCl was added (0.5 M final) and clarified supernatants were applied to Ni-NTA columns. Columns were washed with PBS, followed by 50 mL of PBS with 2% Triton X-114 to remove endotoxins, then with 25 mL of PBS. Recombinant proteins were eluted with a 80, 160, and 320 mM imidazole step gradient in PBS. Fractions containing a homogeneous preparation were concentrated using an Amicon ultracentrifugal filter unit, and the buffer was exchanged for PBS.

Statistical analyses

Where applicable, statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test; calculations were performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla CA). Differences were considered significant when *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, while not significant differences are indicated by “ns”.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S5 (12.1KB, xlsx)
Table S4 (14.6KB, xlsx)
Table S3 (4.7MB, xlsx)
Table S2 (254.4KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge Daniel Defoy at the Proteomics Platform of the Quebec Genomics Center part of the Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval (CRCHUL) (Quebec City, QC, Canada) for performing the LC-MS/MS analyses. Research was supported in part from a grant from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant #238249, (A.J.) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants to (A.J., M.M.S.). The work at Washington University was supported by NIH grants AI081803 and GM097435 to M.M. The work at the USDA was supported by ARS Research Project 1265-32000-094-00D. Funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

L.-P.L., M.T., R.V., M.M.S. and A.J. conceived and designed the experiments. L.-P.L., M.T., R.V., B.A.R., M.N. and E.S. performed the experiments. L.-P.L., M.T., R.V., B.R., M.M.S., M.M. and A.J. analyzed the data. M.J., D.E.H., D.S.Z., T.G.G., J.V.W., M.M. and J.F.U. contributed reagents, materials and analysis tools. L.-P.L., B.A.R., M.M.S., M.M. and A.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Data Availability

Raw reads from transcriptomic analyses were deposited in the GenBank Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA179528 (SRX1838974 - SRX1838986). Genomic sequencing and gene annotation data are available on the NCBI sequence read archive (Biosample ID SAMN02721381, BioProject ID PRJNA179528). All other datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available upon request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-34174-4.

References

  • 1.Bach JF. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:911–920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elliott DE, Urban JJ, Argo CK, Weinstock JV. Does the failure to acquire helminthic parasites predispose to Crohn’s disease? FASEB J. 2000;14:1848–1855. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-0885hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989;299:1259–1260. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ. Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 2012;380:1590–1605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Economou M, Pappas G. New global map of Crohn’s disease: Genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic correlations. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:709–720. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guarner F, et al. Mechanisms of disease: the hygiene hypothesis revisited. Nat Clin Pract Gastr. 2006;3:275–284. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elliott DE, Weinstock JV. Where are we on worms? Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:551–556. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283572f73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ramanan D, et al. Helminth infection promotes colonization resistance via type 2 immunity. Science. 2016;352:608–612. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li RW, et al. Alterations in the porcine colon microbiota induced by the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris suis. Infect Immun. 2012;80:2150–2157. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00141-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daveson AJ, et al. Effect of hookworm infection on wheat challenge in celiac disease–a randomised double-blinded placebo controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giacomin P, et al. Changes in duodenal tissue-associated microbiota following hookworm infection and consecutive gluten challenges in humans with coeliac disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36797. doi: 10.1038/srep36797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Helmby H. Human helminth therapy to treat inflammatory disorders - where do we stand? BMC Immunol. 2015;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12865-015-0074-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pittman JS, Shepherd G, Thacker BJ, Myers GH. Trichuris suis in finishing pigs: Case report and review. J Swine Health Prod. 2010;18:306–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Beer RJ. Morphological descriptions of the egg and larval stages of Trichuris suis Schrank, 1788. Parasitology. 1973;67:263–278. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000046503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beer RJ. The relationship between Trichuris trichiura (Linnaeus 1758) of man and Trichuris suis (Schrank 1788) of the pig. Res Vet Sci. 1976;20:47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zaph C, Cooper PJ, Harris NL. Mucosal immune responses following intestinal nematode infection. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36:439–452. doi: 10.1111/pim.12090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elliott DE, Weinstock JV. Helminth-host immunological interactions: prevention and control of immune-mediated diseases. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2012;1247:83–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06292.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gerencer M, Marinculic A, Rapic D, Frankovic M, Valpotic I. Immunosuppression of in vivo and in vitro lymphocyte responses in swine induced by Trichinella spiralis or excretory-secretory antigens of the parasite. Vet Parasitol. 1992;44:263–273. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90121-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Langelaar M, et al. Suppression of dendritic cell maturation by Trichinella spiralis excretory/secretory products. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31:641–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bai X, et al. Regulation of cytokine expression in murine macrophages stimulated by excretory/secretory products from Trichinella spiralis in vitro. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;360:79–88. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-1046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aranzamendi C, et al. Trichinella spiralis-secreted products modulate DC functionality and expand regulatory T cells in vitro. Parasite Immunol. 2012;34:210–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2012.01353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Segura M, Su Z, Piccirillo C, Stevenson MM. Impairment of dendritic cell function by excretory-secretory products: a potential mechanism for nematode-induced immunosuppression. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:1887–1904. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Valanparambil RM, et al. Production and analysis of immunomodulatory excretory-secretory products from the mouse gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:2740–2754. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Massacand JC, et al. Helminth products bypass the need for TSLP in Th2 immune responses by directly modulating dendritic cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:13968–13973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906367106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McSorley HJ, et al. Suppression of type 2 immunity and allergic airway inflammation by secreted products of the helminth Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:2667–2682. doi: 10.1002/eji.201142161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grainger JR, et al. Helminth secretions induce de novo T cell Foxp3 expression and regulatory function through the TGF-beta pathway. J Exp Med. 2010;207:2331–2341. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vendelova E, et al. Proteomic analysis of excretory-secretory products of Mesocestoides corti Metacestodes reveals potential suppressors of dendritic cell functions. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Geiger SM, et al. Stage-specific immune responses in human Necator americanus infection. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:347–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00950.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hiemstra IH, et al. Excreted/secreted Trichuris suis products reduce barrier function and suppress inflammatory cytokine production of intestinal epithelial cells. Mol Immunol. 2014;60:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ebner F, et al. Therapeutic potential of larval excretory/secretory proteins of the pig whipworm Trichuris suis in allergic disease. Allergy. 2014;69:1489–1497. doi: 10.1111/all.12496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ottow MK, et al. The helminth Trichuris suis suppresses TLR4-induced inflammatory responses in human macrophages. Genes Immun. 2014;15:477–486. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klaver EJ, et al. Trichuris suis soluble products induce Rab7b expression and limit TLR4 responses in human dendritic cells. Genes Immun. 2015;16:378–387. doi: 10.1038/gene.2015.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoeksema MA, et al. Treatment with Trichuris suis soluble products during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation reduces inflammatory responses through epigenetic remodeling. FASEB J. 2016;30:2826–2836. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600343R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kooij G, et al. Trichuris suis induces human non-classical patrolling monocytes via the mannose receptor and PKC: implications for multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:45. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0223-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Summan A, Nejsum P, Williams AR. Modulation of human dendritic cell activity by Giardia and helminth antigens. Parasite Immunol. 2018;40:e12525. doi: 10.1111/pim.12525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Navarro S, et al. Hookworm recombinant protein promotes regulatory T cell responses that suppress experimental asthma. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:362ra143. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu N, et al. Recombinant Trichinella pseudospiralis serine protease inhibitors alter macrophage polarization in vitro. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1834. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kraus E, Kiltz HH, Femfert UF. The specificity of proteinase K against oxidized insulin B chain. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1976;357:233–237. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1976.357.1.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blum AM, et al. Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri induces tolerogenic dendritic cells that block colitis and prevent antigen-specific gut T cell responses. J Immunol. 2012;189:2512–2520. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Weng M, et al. Alternatively activated macrophages in intestinal helminth infection: effects on concurrent bacterial colitis. J Immunol. 2007;179:4721–4731. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol. 2000;164:6166–6173. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. doi: 10.12703/P6-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Punjabi CJ, Laskin DL, Heck DE, Laskin JD. Production of nitric oxide by murine bone marrow cells. Inverse correlation with cellular proliferation. J Immunol. 1992;149:2179–2184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Perretti M, Szabo C, Thiemermann C. Effect of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 on leucocyte migration and nitric oxide production in the mouse. Brit J Pharmacol. 1995;116:2251–2257. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb15061.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bogdan C, Thuring H, Dlaska M, Rollinghoff M, Weiss G. Mechanism of suppression of macrophage nitric oxide release by IL-13: influence of the macrophage population. J Immunol. 1997;159:4506–4513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Coccia EM, Stellacci E, Marziali G, Weiss G, Battistini A. IFN-gamma and IL-4 differently regulate inducible NO synthase gene expression through IRF-1 modulation. Int Immunol. 2000;12:977–985. doi: 10.1093/intimm/12.7.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bronte V, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kobayashi T, et al. NFIL3 is a regulator of IL-12p40 in macrophages and mucosal immunity. J Immunol. 2011;186:4649–4655. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ruffell D, et al. A CREB-C/EBPbeta cascade induces M2 macrophage-specific gene expression and promotes muscle injury repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17475–17480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908641106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hutchins AP, Diez D, Miranda-Saavedra D. The IL-10/STAT3-mediated anti-inflammatory response: recent developments and future challenges. Brief Funct Genomics. 2013;12:489–498. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elt028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Na YR, Jung D, Yoon BR, Lee WW, Seok SH. Endogenous prostaglandin E2 potentiates anti-inflammatory phenotype of macrophage through the CREB-C/EBP-beta cascade. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:2661–2671. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sanduja S, Blanco FF, Young LE, Kaza V, Dixon DA. The role of tristetraprolin in cancer and inflammation. Front Biosci. 2012;17:174–188. doi: 10.2741/3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Owyang AM, et al. Interleukin 25 regulates type 2 cytokine-dependent immunity and limits chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 2006;203:843–849. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Setiawan T, et al. Heligmosomoides polygyrus promotes regulatory T-cell cytokine production in the murine normal distal intestine. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4655–4663. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00358-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zaph C, et al. Epithelial-cell-intrinsic IKK-beta expression regulates intestinal immune homeostasis. Nature. 2007;446:552–556. doi: 10.1038/nature05590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Humphreys NE, Xu D, Hepworth MR, Liew FY, Grencis RK. IL-33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes. J Immunol. 2008;180:2443–2449. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Taylor BC, et al. TSLP regulates intestinal immunity and inflammation in mouse models of helminth infection and colitis. J Exp Med. 2009;206:655–667. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hang L, et al. Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection activates colonic Foxp3+ T cells enhancing their capacity to prevent colitis. J Immunol. 2013;191:1927–1934. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Laan LC, et al. The whipworm (Trichuris suis) secretes prostaglandin E2 to suppress proinflammatory properties in human dendritic cells. FASEB J. 2017;31:719–731. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600841R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jex AR, et al. Genome and transcriptome of the porcine whipworm Trichuris suis. Nat Genet. 2014;46:701–706. doi: 10.1038/ng.3012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Foth BJ, et al. Whipworm genome and dual-species transcriptome analyses provide molecular insights into an intimate host-parasite interaction. Nat Genet. 2014;46:693–700. doi: 10.1038/ng.3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gough DJ, Levy DE, Johnstone RW, Clarke CJ. IFNgamma signaling-does it mean JAK-STAT? Cytokine Growth F R. 2008;19:383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hamerman JA, et al. Negative regulation of TLR signaling in myeloid cells–implications for autoimmune diseases. Immunological Rev. 2016;269:212–227. doi: 10.1111/imr.12381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kratochvill F, et al. Tristetraprolin limits inflammatory cytokine production in tumor-associated macrophages in an mRNA decay-independent manner. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3054–3064. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kobayashi T, et al. NFIL3-deficient mice develop microbiota-dependent, IL-12/23-driven spontaneous colitis. J Immunol. 2014;192:1918–1927. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Brys L, et al. Reactive oxygen species and 12/15-lipoxygenase contribute to the antiproliferative capacity of alternatively activated myeloid cells elicited during helminth infection. J Immunol. 2005;174:6095–6104. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Valanparambil RM, Tam M, Jardim A, Geary TG, Stevenson MM. Primary Heligmosomoides polygyrus bakeri infection induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that suppress CD4(+) Th2 responses and promote chronic infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10:238–249. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Valanparambil RM, et al. IRF-8 regulates expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and modulates Th2 immune responses to gastrointestinal nematode infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006647. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang Q, et al. A Schistosoma japonicum infection promotes the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by activating the JAK/STAT3 pathway. J Immunol. 2017;198:4716–4727. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Anderson CF, Oukka M, Kuchroo VJ, Sacks D. CD4(+)CD25(−)Foxp3(−) Th1 cells are the source of IL-10-mediated immune suppression in chronic cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Exp Med. 2007;204:285–297. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jankovic D, et al. Conventional T-bet(+)Foxp3(−) Th1 cells are the major source of host-protective regulatory IL-10 during intracellular protozoan infection. J Exp Med. 2007;204:273–283. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cope A, Le Friec G, Cardone J, Kemper C. The Th1 life cycle: molecular control of IFN-gamma to IL-10 switching. Trends Imunol. 2011;32:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hewitson JP, et al. The secreted triose phosphate isomerase of Brugia malayi is required to sustain microfilaria production in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003930. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bellafiore S, et al. Direct identification of the Meloidogyne incognita secretome reveals proteins with host cell reprogramming potential. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000192. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yatsuda AP, Krijgsveld J, Cornelissen AW, Heck AJ, de Vries E. Comprehensive analysis of the secreted proteins of the parasite Haemonchus contortus reveals extensive sequence variation and differential immune recognition. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:16941–16951. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212453200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Knudsen GM, Medzihradszky KF, Lim KC, Hansell E, McKerrow JH. Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni cercarial secretions. Mol Cell Proteomics: MCP. 2005;4:1862–1875. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500097-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Miranda-Ozuna JF, et al. The glycolytic enzyme triosephosphate isomerase of Trichomonas vaginalis is a surface-associated protein induced by glucose that functions as a laminin- and fibronectin-binding protein. Infec Immun. 2016;84:2878–2894. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00538-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pereira LA, et al. Analysis of the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis triosephosphate isomerase suggests the potential for adhesin function. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:1381–1388. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Spooner R, Yilmaz O. Nucleoside-diphosphate-kinase: a pleiotropic effector in microbial colonization under interdisciplinary characterization. Microbes Infect. 2012;14:228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pedra JH, Cassel SL, Sutterwala FS. Sensing pathogens and danger signals by the inflammasome. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pelegrin P, Surprenant A. Dynamics of macrophage polarization reveal new mechanism to inhibit IL-1beta release through pyrophosphates. EMBO J. 2009;28:2114–2127. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sakaki H, Tsukimoto M, Harada H, Moriyama Y, Kojima S. Autocrine regulation of macrophage activation via exocytosis of ATP and activation of P2Y11 receptor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.van Kooyk Y. C-type lectins on dendritic cells: key modulators for the induction of immune responses. Biochem Soc T. 2008;36:1478–1481. doi: 10.1042/BST0361478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nigou J, Zelle-Rieser C, Gilleron M, Thurnher M, Puzo G. Mannosylated lipoarabinomannans inhibit IL-12 production by human dendritic cells: evidence for a negative signal delivered through the mannose receptor. J Immunol. 2001;166:7477–7485. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Geijtenbeek TB, et al. Mycobacteria target DC-SIGN to suppress dendritic cell function. J Exp Med. 2003;197:7–17. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tundup S, Srivastava L, Harn DA., Jr. Polarization of host immune responses by helminth-expressed glycans. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2012;1253:E1–E13. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.van Liempt E, et al. Schistosoma mansoni soluble egg antigens are internalized by human dendritic cells through multiple C-type lectins and suppress TLR-induced dendritic cell activation. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:2605–2615. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tyagi R, et al. Cracking the nodule worm code advances knowledge of parasite biology and biotechnology to tackle major diseases of livestock. Biotechnology Adv. 2015;33:980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gnerre S, et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:1513–1518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017351108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Smit A. F., Hubley, R., Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0, http://www.repeatmasker.org (2010).
  • 93.Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Salamov AA, Solovyev VV. Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 2000;10:516–522. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.4.516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:637–644. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cantarel BL, et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008;18:188–196. doi: 10.1101/gr.6743907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tang YT, et al. Genome of the human hookworm Necator americanus. Nat Genet. 2014;46:261–269. doi: 10.1038/ng.2875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction–the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W429–432. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bendtsen JD, Jensen LJ, Blom N, Von Heijne G, Brunak S. Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004;17:349–356. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzh037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wylie T, et al. NemaPath: online exploration of KEGG-based metabolic pathways for nematodes. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:525. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D109–114. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ashburner M, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hunter S, et al. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D306–312. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Quevillon E, et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W116–120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Prufer K, et al. FUNC: a package for detecting significant associations between gene sets and ontological annotations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fischer S, et al. Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL-DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups. Current Protoc Bioinformatics. 2011;6:11–19. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0612s35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Benson DA, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D30–35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rosa BA, Jasmer DP, Mitreva M. Genome-wide tissue-specific gene expression, co-expression and regulation of co-expressed genes in adult nematode Ascaris suum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.McNulty SN, et al. Systems biology studies of adult paragonimus lung flukes facilitate the identification of immunodominant parasite antigens. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kim D, et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Anders S, Pyl TP, Huber W. HTSeq — A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Leroux LP, et al. Parasite manipulation of the invariant chain and the peptide editor H2-DM affects major histocompatibility complex class II antigen presentation during Toxoplasma gondii infection. Infect Immun. 2015;83:3865–3880. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00415-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Reiner NE. Methods in molecular biology. Macrophages and dendritic cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;531:v–vi. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-396-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Quah BJC, Parish CR. The use of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to monitor lymphocyte proliferation. J Vis Exp. 2010;44:2259. doi: 10.3791/2259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S5 (12.1KB, xlsx)
Table S4 (14.6KB, xlsx)
Table S3 (4.7MB, xlsx)
Table S2 (254.4KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Raw reads from transcriptomic analyses were deposited in the GenBank Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA179528 (SRX1838974 - SRX1838986). Genomic sequencing and gene annotation data are available on the NCBI sequence read archive (Biosample ID SAMN02721381, BioProject ID PRJNA179528). All other datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available upon request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES