Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2018 Oct 23;9:2419. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02419

The Combination Therapy of Dietary Galacto-Oligosaccharides With Budesonide Reduces Pulmonary Th2 Driving Mediators and Mast Cell Degranulation in a Murine Model of House Dust Mite Induced Asthma

Kim A T Verheijden 1,2, Saskia Braber 3, Thea Leusink-Muis 1, Prescilla V Jeurink 4, Suzan Thijssen 1, Aletta D Kraneveld 1, Johan Garssen 1,4, Gert Folkerts 1, Linette E M Willemsen 1,*
PMCID: PMC6207001  PMID: 30405619

Abstract

Background: Dietary non-digestible galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) suppress allergic responses in mice sensitized and challenged with house dust mite (HDM). Budesonide is the standard therapy for allergic asthma in humans but is not always completely effective.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of budesonide or different doses of GOS alone or with a combination therapy of budesonide and GOS on HDM-allergic responses in mice.

Methods:BALB/c mice were sensitized and challenged with HDM, while fed a control diet or a diet supplemented with 1 or 2.5 w/w% GOS, and either or not oropharyngeally instilled with budesonide. Systemic and local inflammatory markers, such as mucosal mast cell protease-1 (mMCP-1) in serum, pulmonary CCL17, CCL22, and IL-33 concentrations and inflammatory cell influx in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were determined.

Results: Budesonide or GOS alone suppressed the number of eosinophils in the BALF of HDM allergic mice whereas budesonide either or not combined with GOS lowered both eosinophil and lymphocyte numbers in the BALF of HDM-allergic mice. Both 1 w/w% and 2.5 w/w% GOS and/or budesonide suppressed serum mMCP-1 concentrations. However, budesonide nor GOS alone was capable of reducing Th2 driving chemokines CCL17, CCL22 and IL-33 protein levels in supernatants of lung homogenates of HDM allergic mice, whereas the combination therapy did. Moreover, IL-13 concentrations were only significantly suppressed in mice treated with budesonide while fed GOS. A similar tendency was observed for the frequency of GATA3+CD4+ Th2 and CD4+RORγt+ Th17 cells in the lungs of the allergic mice.

Conclusion: Dietary intervention using GOS may be a novel way to further improve the efficacy of anti-inflammatory drug therapy in allergic asthma by lowering Th2 driving mediators and mast cell degranulation.

Keywords: allergy, asthma, house dust mite, galacto-oligosaccharides, budesonide

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic disease affecting 235 million people worldwide. The disease is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, airway narrowing and airway inflammation containing high numbers of eosinophils (1, 2). House dust mite (HDM) is a common allergen that can induce allergic diseases like asthma and allergic rhinitis (3). Different cytokines (e.g., IL-33 and GM-CSF) and chemokines (e.g., CCL20) can be released by airway epithelial cells after stimulation with HDM contributing to allergic sensitization (4). IL-33 and GM-CSF are capable of activating dendritic cells (DC) and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), which produce IL-5 and IL-13 (2, 5). Furthermore, immature DC are attracted to the lung by CCL20, and in turn are activated by Th2 driving mediators (6). After activation, DC release chemokines such as CCL17 and CCL22 known to drive the development of Th2 effector responses from naïve T cells in the mediastinal lymph nodes. These Th2 cells will migrate to the pulmonary mucosa and like ILC2 produce IL-13 and drive allergic sensitization and symptoms of allergic airway inflammation (4, 6, 7). Long-acting beta agonists with or without glucocorticosteroids are the most commonly used drugs for asthma. Glucocorticosteroids, such as budesonide, are known to bind and activate the intracellular glucocorticoid receptor, which translocates into the nucleus and suppresses the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes, while enhancing transcription of certain regulatory genes of activated immune cells and structural cells (8). The glucocorticosteroids are added to suppress the ongoing allergic airway inflammation. Nevertheless, when the drug is discontinued the effects of inhaled corticosteroids rapidly disappear. However, long-term treatment with glucocorticosteroids, even in low concentrations, can have considerable side effects, such as weight gain, reduced growth in children, and muscle weakness (9–11). Current treatment is therefore still not sufficient and novel preventive and/or therapeutic approaches are needed for asthmatic disorders. The gut microbiota has a substantial influence on the systemic immune function. Different animal and human studies indicated changes in the intestinal microbiota may contribute to development of asthma (12–15). Specific non-digestible oligosaccharides such as galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) are selectively fermented in the intestine resulting in support of growth and/or activity of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (12, 16, 17). Non-digestible oligosaccharides can have a preventive effect on allergic diseases. In different murine ovalbumin (OVA) asthma models a combination of GOS/long-chain (lc) fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS)/pectin-derived acidic oligosaccharides (AOS) suppressed airway inflammation and hyperreactivity (18, 19). Furthermore, GOS suppressed allergic airway eosinophilia in ovalbumin-sensitized rats (20). Clinical studies indicated that a mixture of 9:1 GOS/lcFOS provided in the first year of life still has a protective effect against allergic manifestations at 5 years of age for allergic rhinoconjunctivits and atopic dermatitis (21). In addition, GOS/lcFOS in combination with Bifidobacterium breve reduced atopic dermatitis scores in young infants when given for a period of 12 weeks, Interestingly. later in life these children experienced less wheezing and coughing apart from cold and had reduced requirements for asthma medication compared to the control group (22). In adult patients suffering from asthma, this dietary intervention reduced Th2 cytokine production and increased peak expiratory flow (23). In the present study, the effectiveness of combined dietary intervention with GOS and with budesonide, a gold standard reference treatment, on pulmonary inflammation and mast cell degranulation was investigated in a murine HDM-induced allergic asthma model.

Methods

Mice

Male BALB/c mice (Charles River, Maastricht, The Netherlands), 6 to 8-week old were housed under bio-contained sterile conditions using HEPA® filtered isocages® (Tecniplast, Buguggiate, Italy). Food and water were provided ad libitum. All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the Guidelines of the Ethical Committee on the Use of Laboratory Animals of the Utrecht University (DEC 2013.II.08.090).

HDM murine asthma model

While under isoflurane anesthesia, BALB/c mice were intranasally (i.n.) sensitized with PBS in presence or absence of 1 μg HDM (Greer Laboratories, Lenoir, USA) and challenged i.n. with PBS or 10 μg HDM on days 7 to 11 while being fed a diet (AIN-93G, control diet) containing 0, 1 or 2.5 w/w% GOS (Vivinal® GOS syrup with approximately 59% galacto-oligosaccharides, 21% lactose, 19% glucose, and 1% galactose on dry matter (dry matter of 75%); FrieslandCampina Domo, Zwolle, The Netherlands). Carbohydrates in Vivinal® GOS were compensated isocalorically in the control diet by means of exchange against cellulose (for GOS), lactose (for lactose), and dextrose (for glucose), from day−14 to day 14 (24). On day 7, 9 and 11 budesonide (500 μg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) was either or not instilled oropharyngeally, after induction of a light isoflurane anesthesia, 6 h prior to the daily challenge and day 13, 24 h prior to sacrifice on day 14 (25, 26) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Induction of house dust mite allergy in mice. BALB/c mice were intranasally (i.n.) sensitized with PBS or house dust mite (HDM) on day 0 and challenged on days 7 to 11 intranasally with PBS or HDM. Mice were fed control diet (AIN93G, contr) or 1 w/w% or 2.5 w/w% GOS from day −14 to 14 and either or not oropharyngeally instilled with budesonide on days 7, 9, 11, and 13. All mice were sacrificed on day 14.

Airway responsiveness measurement

The EMKA invasive measurement of dynamic resistance (EMKA Technologies, Paris, France) in response to increasing doses of methacholine (acetyl-β-methyl-choline chloride, Sigma-Aldrich) (0–25 mg/ mL, 10% puff for 10 s) was used to measure lung function in anesthetized mice. Data are presented as average lung resistance (RL) in cm H2O/mL*sec-1 (26).

Serum preparation

After sacrifice, blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture. The blood was coagulated 30 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Serum samples were stored at −20°C until further use.

ELISA HDM-specific IgE

Elisa plates (Corning 9018) were coated overnight with HDM (50 μg/mL in PBS), washed, blocked for 1 h with a 0.1% w/v BSA in PBS, washed and incubated with 5x diluted serum samples. Plates were washed and incubated for 1.5 h with 1 μg/mL biotin anti-mouse IgE (553419, BD Biosciences), washed and incubated for 1 h with streptavidin-HRP (Sanquin, Amsterdam) containing ELISA buffer, washed and incubated with TMB (ready to use, eBioscience) and 2M H2SO4 was used to stop the reaction. The absorbance was measured with the iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad) at 450 nm (27).

Bronchoalveolar lavage

Lungs were lavaged with 1 mL of pyrogen-free saline (0.9% NaCl, 37°C) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Complete Mini, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). This was followed by 3 lavages with 1 mL saline solution (0.9% NaCl, 37°C). The BALF cells were centrifuged (400 g, 5 min) and pellets of the lavages were pooled and total numbers of BALF cells were counted using a Bürker-Türk chamber (magnification 100x). For differential BAL cell counts, cytospin preparations were made and stained with Diff-Quick (Merz and Dade A.G., Düdingen, Switzerland). Numbers of lymphocytes, eosinophils, macrophages and neutrophils were scored with light microscopy (28). Afterwards the lavage the right lung was used to prepare lung homogenates, while half of the left lung was used for flowcytometry and the other half of the left lung for in vitro re-stimulation.

Preparation of lung homogenates

Lung samples were homogenized in 1% Triton X100 (Sigma-Aldrich)/PBS containing protease inhibitor (Complete Mini, Roche Diagnostics) using a Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Toulouse, France). Homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C until further use. The protein concentration was measured using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit standardized to BSA according to the manufacturer's protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, USA). The homogenates were diluted to a final concentration of 1 mg protein/mL prior to cytokine or chemokine measurements (29, 30).

Lung restimulation with house dust mite ex vivo

Lung cell suspensions were prepared after enzymatic digestion of the lungs using digestion buffer, containing DNase I and Collagenase A (Roche Diagnostics), for 30 min. The digestion was stopped by adding fetal calf serum (FCS, Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, USA). The lung pieces were passed through a 70 μm filter and rinsed with 10 mL RPMI. Cells were washed and resuspended in RPMI 1640 culture medium (Lonza, Allendale, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and 0.1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Lung cells (4 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in medium with or without 50 μg/mL HDM (Greer Laboratories). The supernatant was harvested after 4 days of culture at 37°C in 5 % CO2 and stored at −20°C until further analysis (31).

Lung T cell subsets assessed by flow cytometry

Aspecific background was blocked using PBS blocking buffer containing 1% BSA and 5% FCS for 30 min. 5 × 105 cells were plated per well and incubated at 4°C for 30 min with different antibodies against CD4-PerCP Cy5 (cat no. 45-0042, clone RM4-5), CD69-FITC (cat no. 11-0691, clone H1.2F3), GATA3-PE (cat no. 12-9966, clone TWAJ), Tbet-eFLUOR660 (cat no. 50-5825, clone eBio4D10), RORγt-PE (cat no. 12-6988, clone AFKJs-9), Foxp3-APC cat no: 17-5773, clone FJK-16s (eBioscience, San Diego, USA), CD8a-APC Cy7 (cat no. 557654, clone 53-6.7) and CD25-FITC (cat no. 553071, clone 7D4CD25 FITC) (BD, Breda, The Netherlands) and matching isotype controls were used. Cells were permeabilized for intracellular staining using fixation/ permeabilization buffer set, according to manufacturer's protocol (eBioscience). Flow cytometry was conducted using FACS Canto II (BD) and analyzed using Flowlogic Software (Inivai Technologies, Victoria, Australia) (32).

Measurement of cytokines and chemokines

IL-33, GM-CSF, CCL17, CCL20, and CCL22 were measured with a DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom), IL-13, IL-5 and mMCP-1 with a Ready-SET-Go!® ELISA (eBioscience) all according to manufacturer's protocol. Cytokine concentrations in supernatants of lung cell restimulation were determined by a standard IL-13 flex set (BD Biosciences). The concentrations of these mediators were expressed as pg/mg protein in supernatants of lung homogenates and pg/mL in restimulation supernatants and serum.

Histology

Lungs were fixed with 10% formalin via a cannula inserted in the trachea at a constant pressure of 25 cm H2O. After 24 h of fixation the lungs were embedded in paraffin and 5 μm sections were cut. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, according to standard methods. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus BX50 microscope equipped with a Leica DFC 320 digital camera, using 200X magnification. Three slides per animal were reviewed in blinded fashion by two independent observers and the percentage of surface area that was infiltrated with inflammatory cells was scored as follow: score 0 no inflammation (0%), score 1 mild inflammation (>0–<30%), score 2 moderate inflammation (>30–<60%), score 3 severe inflammation (>60–100%) (33).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. P < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.04).

Results

Dietary intervention with GOS in combination with budesonide is most effective in reducing eosinophil numbers in BAL-fluid

To study the extent of airway inflammation in HDM-allergic mice upon dietary intervention with 1 w/w% or 2.5 w/w% GOS or intra-airway treatment with budesonide or a combination, the bronchoalveolar lavage was examined. The total number of inflammatory cells was significantly increased in the HDM mice compared to the PBS group both fed the control diet (Figure 2A) This was due to a significant increase in the number of lymphocytes and eosinophils (Figures 2B,C). Dietary intervention with 1 w/w% or 2.5 w/w% GOS significantly reduced the number of total BAL cells and eosinophils, whereas treatment with budesonide reduced total BAL cells, eosinophils, and lymphocyte numbers. When GOS and budesonide were combined the amount of eosinophils almost returned to baseline levels (Figure 2C). An increase of inflammatory cells was also observed in lung histology sections of the HDM mice compared to the PBS mice fed the control diet (Figures 2D–I). Dietary intervention with 1 w/w% or 2.5 w/w% GOS, treatment with budesonide or the combination of both showed a similar decreasing pattern in inflammation score (Figures 2D–I). In addition to pulmonary inflammation, the airway resistance was measured to investigate the lung function in HDM asthmatic mice. There were no differences between the experimental groups on basal level. Methacholine dose-dependently increased airway resistance and a significant increase in lung resistance (6.25–12.5 mg/mL of methacholine) was observed in HDM mice fed the control diet compared to the PBS control group. The GOS diet did not affect this, whereas budesonide alone showed a strong tendency to prevent the increase in airway resistance compared to HDM allergic mice fed the control diet which became significant when budesonide treated HDM allergic mice were also fed the 1 or 2.5% GOS diet in the groups exposed to 6.25 or 12.50 mg/mL methacholine (Supplementary Figure 1). The number of macrophages or neutrophils was not affected upon HDM challenge or not significantly affected by the treatments (Supplementary Figures 2A,B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Combination of dietary GOS and budesonide effectively reduces eosinophilic inflammation in the lungs of HDM-allergic mice. Inflammatory cell influx in the BALF of house dust mite allergic mice. Total BAL cells (A), absolute number of lymphocytes (B), eosinophils (C). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test after One-Way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 compared to the HDM-contr group, + P < 0.05 n = 8–9 mice/group. Representative photomicrographs of the lungs stained with H&E. PBS- control diet (D), HDM-control diet (E), HDM- control diet and budesonide treatment (F), HDM-1 w/w% GOS diet (G), HDM-1 w/w% GOS diet and budesonide treatment (H), inflammation score of histological photomicrographs; the percentage of tissue surface area that was infiltrated with inflammatory cells was scored blinded as follows: score 0 no inflammation (0%), score 1 mild inflammation (>0– < 30%), score 2 moderate inflammation (>30– < 60%), score 3 severe inflammation (>60–100%) (I). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using Kruskall Wallis test. Magnification 200x, BALF n = 8–9 mice per group, histology n = 5 mice/group. PBS, PBS- sensitized and PBS- challenged mice (white bars); HDM, HDM -sensitized and challenged mice (gray bars); Contr, control diet; GOS, 1 w/w% GOS or 2.5 w/w% GOS diet; Bud, budesonide.

Dietary intervention with GOS in combination with budesonide decreases serum mMCP-1 and chemokine and cytokine concentrations in lung homogenates

To examine the effect on mast cell degranulation, mMCP-1 concentrations were measured in serum. The expression of mMCP-1 in the HDM control group tended to increase compared to the PBS control group. Dietary intervention with 1 w/w% GOS or 2.5 w/w% GOS, as well as budesonide treatment or the combination of both, significantly decreased the levels of mMCP-1 (Figure 3A). In HDM-allergic mice HDM-IgE levels were increased compared to control mice, however these were not significantly affected by the treatments (Supplementary Figure 3A). IL-33 was significantly increased in supernatants of lung homogenates of HDM allergic mice. Dietary GOS or budesonide treatment did not affect this, while the combination significantly decreased IL-33 concentrations in HDM allergic mice (Figure 3B). The combination therapy decreased basal CCL17 and CCL22 concentrations already in control animals (Figures 3C,D). In HDM-allergic mice, CCL17 and CCL22 were significantly enhanced and again only the combination therapy significantly decreased these concentrations (Figures 3C,D). GM-CSF and CCL20 did not significantly increase in HDM allergic mice compared control mice these (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Combination of dietary GOS and budesonide suppresses mMCP-1 serum concentration and Th2 driving mediators in lung homogenates of HDM allergic mice. mMCP-1 (A) (pg/mL in serum) and IL-33 (B), CCL17 (C), CCL22 (D) (pg/mg protein in supernatant of lung homogenates) concentrations were measured. Statistical significance of differences was tested using post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test after One-Way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 compared to the HDM-contr group, +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, + + ++P < 0.0001, and ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 compared to the PBS-contr group, n = 6 mice/group. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. PBS: PBS–sensitized and–challenged mice (white bars), HDM, HDM-sensitized and–challenged mice (gray bars). Contr, control diet; GOS, 1 w/w% GOS or 2.5 w/w% GOS diet; Bud, budesonide. Results are shown as mean ± SEM.

Dietary intervention with GOS in combination with budesonide decreases pulmonary Il-13 concentrations

Th2 type inflammation marker IL-13 was measured in lung homogenate supernatants. IL-13 concentrations were significantly increased in the HDM group fed the control diet (Figure 4A). This was confirmed after ex vivo re-stimulation of lung cell suspensions with HDM (Figure 4B). Only in budesonide treated mice fed the GOS diet, IL-13 concentrations were significantly reduced and the same tendency was shown upon HDM re-stimulation of lung cells (Figures 4A,B). IL-13 concentrations in lung homogenates of HDM mice correlated positively with the number of lymphocytes measured in the BALF (Figure 4C). IL-5 concentrations did not significantly increase in HDM allergic mice compared control mice these (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Combination of dietary GOS and budesonide reduces IL-13 concentrations in the lungs of HDM-allergic mice. IL-13 concentrations were measured in supernatants of lung homogenates (pg/mg protein) (A) and in supernatants of lung cell suspensions upon ex vivo HDM restimulation (pg/mL) (B). Correlation of IL-13 concentration in lung homogenates and the number of lymphocytes between the HDM-groups (C). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test after One-Way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 compared to the HDM-contr group n = 6 mice/group. Correlation was assessed using the Spearman correlation test. PBS, PBS–sensitized and–challenged mice (white bars); HDM, HDM-sensitized and–challenged mice (gray bars). Contr, control diet; GOS, 1 w/w% GOS or 2.5 w/w% GOS diet; Bud, budesonide.

Decreased frequency of activated T-helper cells, Th2 and Th17 cells after dietary intervention with GOS combined with budesonide

The expression of the early activation marker CD69 was increased in CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells in lungs of HDM mice and not affected by the GOS diet. After treatment with budesonide with or without GOS, a decreased frequency of activated Th cells was observed (Figure 5A). The frequency of GATA3+CD4+ Th2 cells was significantly increased in HDM allergic mice fed the control diet compared to the PBS control group (Figures 5B,C). The combination of GOS with budesonide tended to decrease GATA3+CD4+ Th2 cells (p = 0.06) (Figure 5B). Although the frequency of CD4+RORγt+ Th17 cells or CD4+Tbet+ Th1 cells was not significantly increased in HDM allergic mice compared to PBS control mice, a tendency toward a decrease in Th17 cell frequency was observed only when mice were treated with 2.5 w/w% GOS combined with budesonide (p = 0.07) (Figures 5C–E). The frequency of FoxP3+CD25+ of CD4+ Treg cells was not affected by the GOS diet in control and HDM allergic mice, but tended to be lower in the HDM allergic mice treated with budesonide compared to HDM allergic mice, in presence or absence of the GOS diet. This reached significance in the budesonide treated HDM allergic mice fed the 2.5% GOS diet (p < 0.05) compared to HDM allergic mice fed the 2.5% GOS diet (Supplementary Figure 3B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The frequency of activated Th cells and Th2 and Th17 cells decreases after dietary intervention with 2.5 w/w% GOS combined with budesonide. Representative dot plots and histograms of gating strategy of lung T helper cell subsets (E). Lymphocytes were gated based on FSC-SSC pattern, and T helper cells were gated based on expression of CD4. Within the CD4+ population the frequency of GATA3 (Th2 cells), RORγt (Th17 cells) and Tbet (Th1 cells) was analyzed. In the histogram the blue line represents FMO control, red line isotype control and green line MFI of the specific antibody. Percentage of activated CD4+ cells (A), GATA3+ of CD4+ cells (B), RORγt+ of CD4+ cells (C), and Tbet+ of CD4+ cells (D) was calculated. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test after One-Way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 compared to the HDM-contr group, +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, n = 6 mice/group.

Discussion

This study was performed to examine whether a combination therapy consisting of dietary GOS with budesonide was more effective than either of the treatments alone. Dietary intervention with GOS improved the effectiveness of budesonide therapy in most features of the HDM asthma model. Murine HDM allergic asthma models are commonly used to mimic some of the human features of asthma as they show airway inflammation and pulmonary cytokine release similar to humans (34, 35). Previously we showed that GOS had similar preventive effects as budesonide in suppressing allergic features in a murine model for HDM-induced allergic asthma (26). In the current study the combination of GOS and budesonide almost completely abolished eosinophil and lymphocyte numbers, which was associated with improved airway resistance, lower inflammatory mediator release and reduced mast cell degranulation (serum mMCP-1). mMCP-1 is released by mast cells in the tissue upon allergen challenge, becomes available locally and as a reflection can be measured back in the serum (36–38) (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Overview of the effects of the dietary intervention with GOS combined with glucocorticosteroid budesonide treatment. After the initial exposure to HDM mMCP-1 is released by mast cells, and IL-33 is known to be secreted by the airway epithelium, which can also activate mast cells as well as DC and ILC2. Combination of the GOS diet with budesonide treatment reduced mMCP-1 and IL-33 concentrations. CCL17 and CCL22 are secreted by activated DC, which can differentiate naïve T cells into Th2 cells and are chemo-attractants for Th2 cells. The combination therapy significant suppressed the production of both chemokines. Th2 cells as well as ILC2 and mast cells are able to produce IL-13. Concentrations of IL-13 were reduced after the treatment of both GOS and budesonide. The number of lymphocytes and eosinophils was decreased by treatment with budesonide, whereas GOS alone suppressed the number of eosinophils. The combination of dietary GOS with budesonide treatment effectively suppressed both leukocyte subtypes. Only dietary intervention with GOS in combination with budesonide tended to suppress the Th2 and Th17 frequency in lung cell suspensions. Small arrows, tendency to reduce; big arrows, significant reduced.

In the airways of asthmatic patients the level of IL-33, mainly expressed by bronchial epithelial cells, is increased (39, 40). After allergen stimulation, IL-33 can activate mast cells, ILC2, and dendritic cells which are driven to produce Th2 polarizing chemokines CCL17 and CCL22. Moreover, IL-33 acts as a chemo-attractant for Th2 cells (41–45). In airway tissue of asthmatics, mast cell numbers and levels of mast cell proteases are increased and also an increase in activation and recruitment of Th2 lymphocytes is observed (46). Interestingly, the IL-33 and mucosal mast cell derived mMCP-1 concentrations were significantly suppressed by the combination therapy of GOS with budesonide in HDM-HDM mice (Figure 6). The latter is of particular importance, since in asthmatic patients, budesonide had no effect on IL-33 levels (47). As IL-33 is also important for activation of Th2 driving DC and ILC2, effective reduction may result in decreased allergic inflammation and symptoms. Increased levels of CCL17 were found in BALF, plasma/serum and sputum of patients with asthma (48–50). DC, that drive allergic sensitization, produce CCL17 as well as CCL22, which are both CCR4 ligands (51) and involved in Th2 polarization, allergic sensitization and allergic effector responses as CCR4 is expressed by allergen induced Th2 lymphocytes which are attracted than to the airways in humans (52–55). Furthermore, in a murine asthma model, CCL22 or CCL17 neutralization decreased eosinophilic airway inflammation and ameliorated allergic symptoms (56). Dietary intervention with 1 w/w% GOS tended to reduce both CCL17 and CCL22, while budesonide reduced CCL22. By contrast, the combination of the GOS diet and budesonide significantly reduced the concentrations of both chemokines (Figure 6). This indicates that dietary GOS facilitates budesonide treatment in its capacity to further decrease allergy driving mediators IL-33, CCL17 and CCL22, derived from both airway epithelial cells and DC. As far as we know, such a mechanism has not been described before and may be part of the mechanism by which dietary GOS enforces the actions of budesonide treatment.

To our knowledge this study is the first to demonstrate that dietary adjunct therapy may support the anti-inflammatory properties of glucocorticosteroid treatment. Anti-inflammatory therapies still have considerable side-effects (9–11) and decreasing the dose of glucocorticosteroid may have beneficial effects for asthmatic patients. It would be interesting to know whether GOS can affect these side effects and whether lower doses of glucocorticosteroids can be used in combination with GOS in BALB/c mice as well as other mice strains like C57/BL6. In addition, the effects of the dietary intervention and/or budesonide treatment on intestinal and pulmonary microbiome composition and bacterial fermentation products should be studied, since the microbiome composition and activity has been shown affect the susceptibility to develop airway inflammation and microbial dysbiosis is observed in people affected with asthma (57–59).

T lymphocytes are important in the development of asthma. Activated T helper cells are increased in asthmatic mice (60). In the current study, budesonide treatment alone or in combination with a GOS diet showed a decrease in activated T-cell frequency (Figure 6). The reduction in Th2 driving mediators by budesonide treatment in GOS fed HDM mice may have resulted in a reduced Th2 polarization and Th2 cell influx. Indeed Th2 type cytokine concentrations of IL-13 were significantly lower in HDM allergic mice with the combination therapy (Figure 6). Antigen-specific Th2 cells, ILC2s and mast cells secrete IL-13 (41, 61, 62). In the HDM allergic mice IL-13 was not only increased in lung tissue, but also in lung cell suspensions exposed to HDM. Similar, in mild asthmatics, an increase in IL-13 mRNA levels was found in the BALF upon allergen challenge (63). GATA3 is necessary for differentiation of naive T cells into Th2 cells but also for the development and function of ILC2 (61, 64). In asthmatic patients, the GATA3 expression in T cells was five times higher compared to healthy controls whereas also bronchial epithelial cells express high levels of GATA3 (65). Here we shows that the combination therapy resulted in a tendency toward a decrease in the frequency of GATA3+CD4+ Th2 cells in the lung. As GATA3 is known to play a crucial role in the production of IL-13 by Th2 cells (61), the reduced lL-13 may be explained, at least in part, by this effect on Th2 cells (Figure 6). Beyond this effect on Th2 cell frequency, the combination therapy also tended to decrease the percentage of RORγt+ CD4+ Th17 cells (66), known to be increased in asthmatic patients (67). HDM sensitization and challenge did not affect the frequency of Treg and budesonide treatment tended to lower the %Treg which could not be rescued by the dietary intervention with GOS. However, in a previous study GOS was shown to improve the regulatory function of the CD25+ cells, which include Treg and via this way GOS may have supported the anti-inflammatory capacities of budesonide treatment (68).

In conclusion, a combination therapy of budesonide together with a dietary intervention with GOS, most effectively suppressed the allergic inflammatory response when compared to either of the treatments alone. Hence, dietary adjunct therapy using GOS may be a novel way to further improve the effectiveness of glucocorticosteroids in asthma.

Author contributions

KV and LW designed the study, performed data analyses, and wrote the manuscript. AK and GF designed the study, helped critically discussing the data and writing the manuscript. PJ and JG were involved in critically discussing the data. KV performed the studies and SB, TL-M, and ST helped out with technical assistance and helpful discussions.

Conflict of interest statement

KV and SB were given grants by the Carbohydrate Competence Center (CCC); PJ and JG are employees of Nutricia Research, which is an industrial partner in the Dutch Carbohydrate Competence Center. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This project is jointly financed by the European Union, European Regional Development Fund and The Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, Peaks in the Delta, the Municipality of Groningen, the Provinces of Groningen, Fryslân and Drenthe, the Dutch Carbohydrate Competence Center (CCC WP25; www.cccresearch.nl), Nutricia Research, and FrieslandCampina.

Glossary

Abbreviations

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

DC

dendritic cell

FOS

fructo-oligosaccharide

GOS

galacto-oligosaccharide

HDM

house dust mite

ILC2

group 2 innate lymphoid cell

OVA

ovalbumin.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02419/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

Pulmonary resistance upon methacholine exposure. Methacholine induced lung resistance was measured by means of EMKA and significantly increased in the HDM allergic mice at 6.25–12.5 mg/mL. This was not affected by the GOS, whereas budesonide alone tended to prevent the increase in airway resistance. Budesonide treatment of HDM allergic mice fed the 1% or 2.5% GOS significantly reduced lung resistance. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test.0.05 *P < (compared to HDM-control), ++P < 0.01 n = 8–9 mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (605.2KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure 2

Effect of dietary GOS and/or budesonide on the number of macrophages and neutrophils in the BALF. The absolute number of macrophages (A) and neutrophils (B) in the BALF. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 n = 8–9 mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (191.2KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure 3

HDM specific IgE in serum and the frequency of regulatory T-cells in lung tissue. HDM-IgE was measured in serum by means of ELISA and increased in HDM-allergic mice compared to PBS controls (A). Budesonide treatment and/or the GOS diet did not significantly affect HDM-IgE levels. Within the CD4+ population the frequency (%) of Foxp3+CD25+ Treg cells was analyzed in lung tissue (B). Budesonide tended to lower %Treg, which was not affected by the GOS diets. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. * or + P < 0.05, n = 7–13 for HDM-IgE and n = 8–9 for Treg mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (180KB, TIF)

References

  • 1.Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. The immunology of asthma. Nat Immunol. (2014) 16:45–56. 10.1038/ni.3049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benton MJ, Lim TK, Ko FWS, Kan-O K, Mak JCW. Year in review 2017: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Respirology (2018) 23:538–45. 10.1111/resp.13285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eifan AO, Calderon MA, Durham SR. Allergen immunotherapy for house dust mite: clinical efficacy and immunological mechanisms in allergic rhinitis and asthma. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2013) 13:1543–56. 10.1517/14712598.2013.844226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salazar F, Ghaemmaghami AM. Allergen recognition by innate immune cells: critical role of dendritic and epithelial cells. Front Immunol. (2013) 4:356. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. Asthma: the importance of dysregulated barrier immunity. Eur J Immunol. (2013) 43:3125–37. 10.1002/eji.201343730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vroman H, van den Blink B, Kool M. Mode of dendritic cell activation: the decisive hand in Th2/Th17 cell differentiation. Implications in asthma severity? Immunobiology (2015) 220:254–61. 10.1016/j.imbio.2014.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kudo M, Ishigatsubo Y, Aoki I. Pathology of asthma. Front Microbiol. (2013) 4:263. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hansbro PM, Kim RY, Starkey MR, Donovan C, Dua K, Mayall JR, et al. Mechanisms and treatments for severe, steroid-resistant allergic airway disease and asthma. Immunol Rev. (2017) 278:41–62. 10.1111/imr.12543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tamm M, Richards DH, Beghe B, Fabbri L. Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist pharmacological profiles: effective asthma therapy in practice. Respir Med. (2012) 106(Suppl 1):S9–19. 10.1016/S0954-6111(12)70005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Olin JT, Wechsler ME. Asthma: pathogenesis and novel drugs for treatment. BMJ (2014) 349:g5517. 10.1136/bmj.g5517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Skoner DP. Inhaled corticosteroids: Effects on growth and bone health. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2016) 117:595–600. 10.1016/j.anai.2016.07.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gourbeyre P, Denery S, Bodinier M. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: impact on the gut immune system and allergic reactions. J Leukoc Biol. (2011) 89:685–95. 10.1189/jlb.1109753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noverr MC, Huffnagle GB. Does the microbiota regulate immune responses outside the gut? Trends Microbiol. (2004) 12:562–8. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vieira WA, Pretorius E. The impact of asthma on the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). J Asthma Allergy (2010) 3:123–30. 10.2147/JAA.S10592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gollwitzer ES, Marsland BJ. Microbiota abnormalities in inflammatory airway diseases-potential for therapy. Pharmacol Ther. (2014) 141:32–9. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr. (1995) 125:1401–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients (2013) 5:1417–35. 10.3390/nu5041417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vos AP, Haarman M, van Ginkel JW, Knol J, Garssen J, Stahl B, et al. Dietary supplementation of neutral and acidic oligosaccharides enhances Th1-dependent vaccination responses in mice. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2007) 18:304–12. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00515.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sagar S, Vos AP, Morgan ME, Garssen J, Georgiou NA, Boon L, et al. The combination of Bifidobacterium breve with non-digestible oligosaccharides suppresses airway inflammation in a murine model for chronic asthma. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1842:573–83. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sonoyama K, Watanabe H, Watanabe J, Yamaguchi N, Yamashita A, Hashimoto H, et al. Allergic airway eosinophilia is suppressed in ovalbumin-sensitized Brown Norway rats fed raffinose and alpha-linked galactooligosaccharide. J Nutr. (2005) 135:538–43. 10.1093/jn/135.3.538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arslanoglu S, Moro GE, Boehm G, Wienz F, Stahl B, Bertino E. Early neutral prebiotic oligosaccharide supplementation reduces the incidence of some allergic manifestations in the first 5 years of life. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2012) 26:49–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.van der Aa LB, van Aalderen WM, Heymans HS, Henk Sillevis Smitt J, Nauta AJ, Knippels LM, et al. Synbiotics prevent asthma-like symptoms in infants with atopic dermatitis. Allergy (2011) 66:170–7. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02416.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van de Pol MA, Lutter R, Smids BS, Weersink EJ, van der Zee JS. Synbiotics reduce allergen-induced T-helper 2 response and improve peak expiratory flow in allergic asthmatics. Allergy (2011) 66:39–47. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02454.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kool M, Willart MA, van Nimwegen M, Bergen I, Pouliot P, Virchow JC, et al. An unexpected role for uric acid as an inducer of T helper 2 cell immunity to inhaled antigens and inflammatory mediator of allergic asthma. Immunity (2011) 34:527–40. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Braber S, Overbeek SA, Koelink PJ, Henricks PA, Zaman GJ, Garssen J, et al. CXCR2 antagonists block the N-Ac-PGP-induced neutrophil influx in the airways of mice, but not the production of the chemokine CXCL1. Eur J Pharmacol. (2011) 668:443–9. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verheijden KA, Willemsen LE, Braber S, Leusink-Muis T, Delsing DJ, Garssen J, et al. Dietary galacto-oligosaccharides prevent airway eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness in a murine house dust mite-induced asthma model. Respir Res. (2015) 16:17. 10.1186/s12931-015-0171-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mushaben EM, Kramer EL, Brandt EB, Khurana Hershey GK, Le Cras TD. Rapamycin attenuates airway hyperreactivity, goblet cells, and IgE in experimental allergic asthma. J Immunol. (2011) 187:5756–63. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sagar S, Verheijden KA, Georgiou NA, Garssen J, Kraneveld AD, Vos AP, et al. Differential regulation of inflammation and immunity in mild and severe experimental asthma. Mediators Inflamm. (2013) 2013:808470. 10.1155/2013/808470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Braber S, Koelink PJ, Henricks PA, Jackson PL, Nijkamp FP, Garssen J, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced lung emphysema in mice is associated with prolyl endopeptidase, an enzyme involved in collagen breakdown. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2011) 300:L255–65. 10.1152/ajplung.00304.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koelink PJ, Overbeek SA, Braber S, Morgan ME, Henricks PA, Abdul Roda M, et al. Collagen degradation and neutrophilic infiltration: a vicious circle in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut (2014) 63:578–87. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sagar S, Morgan ME, Chen S, Vos AP, Garssen J, van Bergenhenegouwen J, et al. Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus rhamnosus treatment is as effective as budesonide at reducing inflammation in a murine model for chronic asthma. Respir Res. (2014) 15:46. 10.1186/1465-9921-15-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van den Elsen LW, van Esch BC, Hofman GA, Kant J, van de Heijning BJ, Garssen J, et al. Dietary long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent allergic sensitization to cow's milk protein in mice. Clin Exp Allergy (2013) 43:798–810. 10.1111/cea.12111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Braber S, Verheijden KA, Henricks PA, Kraneveld AD, Folkerts G. A comparison of fixation methods on lung morphology in a murine model of emphysema. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2010) 299:L843–51. 10.1152/ajplung.00192.2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nials AT, Uddin S. Mouse models of allergic asthma: acute and chronic allergen challenge. Dis Model Mech. (2008) 1:213–20. 10.1242/dmm.000323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gregory LG, Lloyd CM. Orchestrating house dust mite-associated allergy in the lung. Trends Immunol. (2011) 32:402–11. 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schouten B, van Esch BC, Hofman GA, van den Elsen LW, Willemsen LE, Garssen J. Acute allergic skin reactions and intestinal contractility changes in mice orally sensitized against casein or whey. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (2008) 147:125–34. 10.1159/000135699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xing W, Austen KF, Gurish MF, Jones TG. Protease phenotype of constitutive connective tissue and of induced mucosal mast cells in mice is regulated by the tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:14210–5. 10.1073/pnas.1111048108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miller HR, Pemberton AD. Tissue-specific expression of mast cell granule serine proteinases and their role in inflammation in the lung and gut. Immunology (2002) 105:375–90. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01375.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Prefontaine D, Lajoie-Kadoch S, Foley S, Audusseau S, Olivenstein R, Halayko AJ, et al. Increased expression of IL-33 in severe asthma: evidence of expression by airway smooth muscle cells. J Immunol. (2009) 183:5094–103. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prefontaine D, Nadigel J, Chouiali F, Audusseau S, Semlali A, Chakir J, et al. Increased IL-33 expression by epithelial cells in bronchial asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 125:752–4. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saluja R, Ketelaar ME, Hawro T, Church MK, Maurer M, Nawijn MC. The role of the IL-33/IL-1RL1 axis in mast cell and basophil activation in allergic disorders. Mol Immunol. (2015) 63:80–5. 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Borish L, Steinke JW. Interleukin-33 in asthma: how big of a role does it play? Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2011) 11:7–11. 10.1007/s11882-010-0153-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li BW, Hendriks RW. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells in lung inflammation. Immunology (2013) 140:281–7. 10.1111/imm.12153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oboki K, Nakae S, Matsumoto K, Saito H. IL-33 and Airway Inflammation. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. (2011) 3:81–8. 10.4168/aair.2011.3.2.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Khaitov MR, Gaisina AR, Shilovskiy IP, Smirnov VV, Ramenskaia GV, Nikonova AA, et al. The role of interleukin-33 in pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. New experimental data. Biochemistry (2018) 83:13–25. 10.1134/S0006297918010029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hart PH. Regulation of the inflammatory response in asthma by mast cell products. Immunol Cell Biol. (2001) 79:149–53. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.00983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Deckers J, Branco Madeira F, Hammad H. Innate immune cells in asthma. Trends Immunol. (2013) 34:540–7. 10.1016/j.it.2013.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hartl D, Griese M, Nicolai T, Zissel G, Prell C, Konstantopoulos N, et al. Pulmonary chemokines and their receptors differentiate children with asthma and chronic cough. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2005) 115:728–36. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.11.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Leung TF, Wong CK, Chan IH, Ip WK, Lam CW, Wong GW. Plasma concentration of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine is elevated in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2002) 110:404–9. 10.1067/mai.2002.126378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sekiya T, Yamada H, Yamaguchi M, Yamamoto K, Ishii A, Yoshie O, et al. Increased levels of a TH2-type CC chemokine thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) in serum and induced sputum of asthmatics. Allergy (2002) 57:173–7. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.5720256.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Garcia G, Godot V, Humbert M. New chemokine targets for asthma therapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2005) 5:155–60. 10.1007/s11882-005-0090-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gonzalo JA, Pan Y, Lloyd CM, Jia GQ, Yu G, Dussault B, et al. Mouse monocyte-derived chemokine is involved in airway hyperreactivity and lung inflammation. J Immunol. (1999) 163:403–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pilette C, Francis JN, Till SJ, Durham SR. CCR4 ligands are up-regulated in the airways of atopic asthmatics after segmental allergen challenge. Eur Respir J. (2004) 23:876–84. 10.1183/09031936.04.00102504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vijayanand P, Durkin K, Hartmann G, Morjaria J, Seumois G, Staples KJ, et al. Chemokine receptor 4 plays a key role in T cell recruitment into the airways of asthmatic patients. J Immunol. (2010) 184:4568–74. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pease JE, Horuk R. Recent progress in the development of antagonists to the chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR4. Expert Opin Drug Discov. (2014) 9:467–83. 10.1517/17460441.2014.897324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kawasaki S, Takizawa H, Yoneyama H, Nakayama T, Fujisawa R, Izumizaki M, et al. Intervention of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine attenuates the development of allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in mice. J Immunol. (2001) 166:2055–62. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.2055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. (2014) 20:159–66. 10.1038/nm.3444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stokholm J, Blaser MJ, Thorsen J, Rasmussen MA, Waage J, Vinding RK, et al. Maturation of the gut microbiome and risk of asthma in childhood. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:141 10.1038/s41467-017-02573-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chung KF. Airway microbial dysbiosis in asthmatic patients: a target for prevention and treatment? J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:1071–81. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zosky GR, Larcombe AN, White OJ, Burchell JT, von Garnier C, Holt PG, et al. Airway hyperresponsiveness is associated with activated CD4+ T cells in the airways. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2009) 297:L373–9. 10.1152/ajplung.00053.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tindemans I, Serafini N, Di Santo JP, Hendriks RW. GATA-3 function in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunity (2014) 41:191–206. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Annunziato F, Romagnani C, Romagnani S. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2014) 135:626–35. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Corren J. Role of interleukin-13 in asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2013) 13:415–20. 10.1007/s11882-013-0373-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rayees S, Malik F, Bukhari SI, Singh G. Linking GATA-3 and interleukin-13: implications in asthma. Inflamm Res. (2014) 63:255–65. 10.1007/s00011-013-0700-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Caramori G, Lim S, Ito K, Tomita K, Oates T, Jazrawi E, et al. Expression of GATA family of transcription factors in T-cells, monocytes and bronchial biopsies. Eur Respir J. (2001) 18:466–73. 10.1183/09031936.01.00040701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Durrant DM, Gaffen SL, Riesenfeld EP, Irvin CG, Metzger DW. Development of allergen-induced airway inflammation in the absence of T-bet regulation is dependent on IL-17. J Immunol. (2009) 183:5293–300. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ano S, Morishima Y, Ishii Y, Yoh K, Yageta Y, Ohtsuka S, et al. Transcription factors GATA-3 and RORgammat are important for determining the phenotype of allergic airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma. J Immunol. (2013) 190:1056–65. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Verheijden KA, Braber S, Leusink-Muis T, Thijssen S, Boon L, Kraneveld AD, et al. Regulatory T cell depletion abolishes the protective effect of dietary galacto-oligosaccharides on eosinophilic airway inflammation in house dust mite-induced asthma in mice. J Nutr. (2016) 146:831–37. 10.3945/jn.115.224402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Pulmonary resistance upon methacholine exposure. Methacholine induced lung resistance was measured by means of EMKA and significantly increased in the HDM allergic mice at 6.25–12.5 mg/mL. This was not affected by the GOS, whereas budesonide alone tended to prevent the increase in airway resistance. Budesonide treatment of HDM allergic mice fed the 1% or 2.5% GOS significantly reduced lung resistance. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test.0.05 *P < (compared to HDM-control), ++P < 0.01 n = 8–9 mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (605.2KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure 2

Effect of dietary GOS and/or budesonide on the number of macrophages and neutrophils in the BALF. The absolute number of macrophages (A) and neutrophils (B) in the BALF. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 n = 8–9 mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (191.2KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure 3

HDM specific IgE in serum and the frequency of regulatory T-cells in lung tissue. HDM-IgE was measured in serum by means of ELISA and increased in HDM-allergic mice compared to PBS controls (A). Budesonide treatment and/or the GOS diet did not significantly affect HDM-IgE levels. Within the CD4+ population the frequency (%) of Foxp3+CD25+ Treg cells was analyzed in lung tissue (B). Budesonide tended to lower %Treg, which was not affected by the GOS diets. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences was tested using a One-Way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. * or + P < 0.05, n = 7–13 for HDM-IgE and n = 8–9 for Treg mice/group.

Click here for additional data file. (180KB, TIF)

Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES