Abstract
Although hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is inactive in adult healthy liver, it becomes activated during acute and chronic liver injury and, thus, modulates the reparative process and disease progression. We developed a novel mouse model with liver-specific knockout of Smoothened (Smo LKO), and animals were subjected to Fas-induced liver injury in vivo. Results showed that Smo deletion in hepatocytes enhances Fas-induced liver injury. Activation of Hh signaling in hepatocytes in the setting of Fas-induced injury was indicated by the fact that Jo2 treatment enhanced hepatic expression of Ptch1, Smo, and its downstream target Gli1 in control but not Smo LKO mice. Primary hepatocytes from control mice showed increased Hh signaling activation in response to Jo2 treatment in vitro. On the other hand, the Smo KO hepatocytes were devoid of Hh activation and were more susceptible to Jo2-induced apoptosis. The levels of NF-κB and related signaling molecules, including epidermal growth factor receptor and Akt, were lower in Smo KO livers/hepatocytes than in control livers/hepatocytes. Accordingly, hydrodynamic gene delivery of active NK-κB prevented Jo2-induced liver injury in the Smo LKO mice. Our findings provide important evidence that adult hepatocytes become responsive to Hh signaling through up-regulation of Smo in the setting of Fas-induced liver injury and that such alteration leads to activation of NF-κB/epidermal growth factor receptor/Akt, which counteracts Fas-induced hepatocyte apoptosis.
The hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays an important role in embryonic development and in the regulation of a variety of cellular functions, including proliferation, survival, migration, differentiation, and maintenance of progenitor cells.1 Although the Hh pathway is quiescent in normal liver, it becomes reactivated as a repair mechanism in acute and chronic liver injuries and diseases.1 Although healthy livers express low levels of Hh ligands,2, 3, 4 liver injury enhances the production of Hh ligands from several types of resident cells (including hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, hepatic stellate cells, natural killer T cells, and sinusoidal endothelial cells); this process is mediated by various growth factors and cytokines as well as by cytotoxic and apoptotic stresses. The produced Hh ligands are released into the local environment, where they activate the receptors on Hh-responsive cells (including progenitor cells, hepatic stellate cells, and biliary epithelial cells), which mediates liver tissue remodeling and repair. For example, Hh ligands can serve as viability and proliferative factors for liver epithelial progenitors, which are important for liver tissue repair.5, 6, 7 Hh ligands also promote the growth and viability of hepatic stellate cells/myofibroblasts and contribute to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Considering these mechanistic aspects, it is not surprising that Hh pathway activation has been shown to play a role in liver regeneration during partial hepatectomy13 and contribute to the pathogenesis of several liver diseases, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,14, 15 alcoholic liver disease,16 and hepatocellular carcinoma.17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 Therefore, delineation of Hh actions in liver cells will help further understand the pathogenesis of liver diseases and provide new therapeutic implications.
The Hh signaling pathway is activated on the binding of Hh ligands (Sonic Hh, Indian Hh, and Desert Hh) to their receptor, Ptch. In the absence of Hh ligands, Ptch inhibits Smoothened (Smo), a seven-pass membrane protein that belongs to the G-protein–coupled receptor superfamily.24 Binding of Hh ligands to Ptch causes activation of Smo, which subsequently activates the Gli family of transcription factors, leading to expression of Hh target genes. Activation of transcription by the Glis is referred to as the canonical Hh signaling pathway, whereas those not requiring Smo or those downstream of Smo that do not require the Gli transcription faction are collectively referred to as the noncanonical Hh signaling pathway.25, 26
In the liver, the nonparenchymal cells (including hepatic stellate cells and natural killer T cells) and cholangiocytes are known to produce Hh ligands in the setting of liver injury. The adult healthy hepatocytes produce a low amount of Hh ligands,27 although dying or ballooning hepatocytes are known to produce large amounts of Shh ligands.7, 28 The Hh-responsive cells in the liver include progenitor cells, hepatic stellate cells, and biliary epithelial cells, whereas normal adult hepatocytes are considered to be nonresponsive to Hh ligands.1 However, the latter viewpoint has been challenged by a recent study showing that there is cilia-independent but Smo-dependent signaling in mature healthy hepatocytes and that the Hh signaling is detectable in healthy mature hepatocytes.29 To date, the status and impact of Hh signaling in hepatocytes, particularly in the setting of liver injury, remain largely unknown.
The current study was designed to determine the role of Hh signaling in hepatocytes in the setting of Fas-induced liver injury. We developed a novel mouse model with liver-specific knockout of Smo, and the animals were subjected to Fas-induced liver injury to document the status of Hh signaling and the extent of liver injury. Our findings provide novel evidence for an important role of hepatocyte Hh signaling, which counteracts Fas-induced liver injury.
Materials and Methods
Animal Experiments
Homozygous floxed Smo (Smoflox/flox; Smotm2Amc/J) mice and albumin (Alb)-Cre transgenic [B6.Cg-Tg (Alb-cre) 21Mgn/J] mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Smoflox/flox mice were bred to Alb-cre mice and the offspring carried a floxed Smo allele and Alb-cre (Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre+/−). Then, Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre+/− mice were bred with Smoflox/flox mice to obtain Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre+/−; Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre−/−; Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre+/−; and Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre−/− mice (Figure 1A). We used Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre+/− mice as liver-specific knockout of Smo (Smo LKO); their matched littermates Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre−/− and Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre−/− were used as control mice. Eight-week–old male mice were used in this study. The mice were kept at 22°C under a 12-hour light/dark cycle and received food and water freely. All of the breeding and handling of the mice and all experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tulane University (New Orleans, LA).
Figure 1.
Liver-specific deletion of Smo enhances Fas-induced liver injury. A: Schematic diagram showing breeding strategy to generate liver-specific deletion of Smo. Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre+/− mice were used as Smo LKO mice; their matched littermates Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre−/− and Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre−/− were used as controls. B: Survival rates of Smo LKO and control mice. The mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.30 μg/g of body weight Jo2. The Smo LKO mice exhibited significantly higher mortality (five of seven mice died within 5 hours, two of seven mice survived; mortality rate = 71%) compared with the control mice (one of seven mice died at 7 hours, six of seven mice survived; mortality rate = 14%) (P = 0.01). C: Gross and microscopic images of livers. Smo LKO and control mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.30 μg/g of body weight Jo2, and the animals were sacrificed 3 hours after Jo2 injection. Although the control livers appeared normal under gross examination, the Smo LKO livers turned dark red because of hemorrhage. Histologic examination showed more prominent liver tissue damage in Smo LKO livers compared with the control livers (hematoxylin and eosin stain). D: Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels increase in Smo LKO mice compared with control mice. Data are expressed as means ± SD (D). n = 7 per group (B); n = 6 per group (C). ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×100 (C). WT, wild type.
To determine the survival rate, 8-week–old male Smo LKO and control mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.30 μg/g of body weight Jo2 (anti-Fas antibody; BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ) (Jo2 was prepared in a sterile 1× Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); after Jo2 injection, the mice were observed continuously for up to 24 hours to assess mortality. For other experiments, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.30 μg/g of body weight Jo2 and sacrificed at 3 hours after Jo2 injection; blood was collected from mouse orbital sinus according to the standard procedure; liver tissue samples were collected for histology analysis.
Hydrodynamic Tail Vein Injection
Eight-week–old male Smo LKO and control mice were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of ketamine/xylazine (80/10 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich). Bioseb's Mouse Tail Illuminator (Bioseb Company, Vitrolles, France) was provided by the Central Animal Facility at Tulane University Health Sciences Center. The anesthetized mouse was placed into the restraining tube. Tail vein injections were performed by using a 27-gauge needle (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Each mouse was injected with 10% volume/body weight of EGFP empty control plasmid (20 μg/mL; Addgene, Cambridge, MA) or EGFP P65 plasmid (20 μg/mL; Addgene) within 10 seconds. Twenty-four hours after tail vein injection, the mice were intraperitoneally administered Jo2, 0.30 μg/g of body weight. Three hours after Jo2 injection, the mice were sacrificed. Blood and liver tissue samples were collected for further analyses.
Serum Parameter Analysis
As previously described,30 blood samples were centrifuged at 800 × g for 15 minutes, and the sera were collected and then stored at −80°C. Serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities were measured with an automatic analyzer at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tulane University Hospital.
Histopathological Analysis
The liver tissue samples were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μm thick) were affixed to slides, deparaffinized, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Light microscopy was performed to assess the morphologic changes.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling Assay
Detection of apoptotic cells in liver tissue was performed by In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Paraffin-embedded liver tissue sections were dewaxed in xylene twice (5 minutes each time), hydrated in 100% ethanol for 2 minutes, and washed in decreasing concentrations of ethanol (95%, 90%, 80%, and 70%). The tissue sections were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with Proteinase K working solution (20 μg/mL in 10 mmol/L Tris/HCl, pH 7.4 to 8). The slides were rinsed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (Sigma-Aldrich). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling reaction mixture (50 μL) was added to each sample (50 μL label solution was used for negative control). The slides were incubated in a humidified atmosphere for 60 minutes at 37°C in the dark. After rinsing with 1× phosphate-buffered saline for three times, the slides were directly analyzed under a fluorescence microscope using a wavelength at 450 to 500 nm.
Cleaved Caspase-3 Staining
Paraffin-embedded liver tissue sections were stained with cleaved caspase-3 antibody (Biocare Medical, Pike Lane Concord, CA), which specifically recognizes the large fragment (17/19 kDa) of activated caspase-3. The liver tissue sections were deparaffinized by immersing sections in xylene for 10 minutes and hydrated through ethanol to running water. Sections were processed for heat-induced epitope retrieval. After blocking with Biocare's Peroxidazed 1 (Biocare Medical) for 5 minutes, the sections were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with rabbit polyclonal antibody against cleaved caspase-3. After washing three times in tris-buffered saline, the sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA) for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing in tris-buffered saline, diaminobenzidine–horseradish peroxidase substrate was then added for color development.
Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from liver tissues and hepatocytes using Trizol (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). For first-strand cDNA synthesis, 1 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed using Qiagen miScript reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Primers were synthesized at IDT (Coralville, IA) as follows: Smo, 5′-ACCTATGCCTGGCACACTTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTGAGGACAAAGGGGAGTGA-3′ (reverse); Ptch1, 5′-CTGTCAAGGTGAATGGAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGGGTTATTCTGTAAAAGG-3′ (reverse); Gli1, 5′-GCTGTCGGAAGTCCTATT-3′ (forward) and 5′-ACTGGCATTGCTAAAGG-3′ (reverse); and 18S, 5′-CGCTTCCTTACCTGGTTGAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAGCGACCAAAGGAACCATA-3′ (reverse). The miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) and the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) were used. The data were analyzed by using CFX Manager software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad), and the results were normalized to 18S ribosomal RNA.
Hepatocyte Isolation and Culture
Hepatocytes were isolated from male Smo LKO and control mice by an adaptation of the calcium two-step collagenase perfusion technique, as described previously.31 Cells were plated onto collagen-coated 10-cm dishes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) at a density of 3 × 106 cells. The cultures were maintained in Williams' Medium E medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplement Pack (Invitrogen), 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mmol/L l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen). After 2 hours to allow for attachment, the hepatocyte cultures were washed with 1× phosphate-buffered saline and then incubated for 4 hours with media containing 0.50 μg/mL Jo2 plus 10 μg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich).
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was performed according to standard procedures. Primary antibodies against caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8, cleaved caspase-8, caspase-9, cleaved caspase-9, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, NF-κB, p-NF-κB (Ser536), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Akt, p-Akt (Ser473), 4E-binding protein 1, and p-4E-binding protein 1 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA); primary antibody against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was obtained from Ambion (Austin, TX); goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies were purchased from LI-COR Biosciences (Lincoln, NE). Results were analyzed by LI-COR Odyssey (Lincoln, NE).
Nuclear Extract
Nuclear extract was obtained using CelLytic NuCLEAR Extraction Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Specifically, 100 mg liver tissue was homogenized in 500 μL 1× Lysis Buffer (containing 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol and protease inhibitor cocktail) using the PT 1200 E Homogenizer (Kinematica, Bohemia, NY) until >90% of the cells are broken and nuclei are visualized under a microscope. The samples were then centrifuged at 11,000 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube (collected as cytoplasmic fraction). The crude nuclei pellets were resuspended in 0.67× packed cell volume of Extraction Buffer (containing 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol and protease inhibitor cocktail), followed by homogenization using a 27-gauge needle (BD) on ice. The samples were shaken gently for 30 minutes and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C; the supernatant was collected as nuclear extract.
DNA-Protein Pull-Down Assay
Biotinylated and nonbiotinylated EGFR primers were synthesized at IDT. Probes for DNA-protein pull-down assays were generated by annealing biotinylated (or nonbiotinylated) EGFR primers as follows: 5′-end biotinylated EGFR forward primer (5′-biotin-GGAACGCCCC-3′) and 5′-end biotinylated EGFR reverse primer (5′-biotin-GGGGCGTTCC-3′). The primers were diluted to a concentration of 2 μg/μL; 45 μL of each primer was mixed with 10 μL annealing buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mmol/L KCL, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and 0.5% NP40). The solution was incubated at 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by slowly cooling to room temperature (the nonbiotinylated EGFR forward and reverse primers were annealed through the same process). For DNA-protein pull-down assay, a total of 2 μg nuclear protein was incubated with 1 μg annealed biotin-labeled EGFR probe and 10 μg poly (deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic) acid sodium (Sigma-Aldrich) in 500 μL HKMG buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mmol/L KCL, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and 0.5% NP40) on a rocker platform (VWR, Radnor, PA) at 4°C overnight. As negative control, a total of 2 μg nuclear protein was incubated with 1 μg annealed biotin-labeled EGFR probe, 20 μg annealed non–biotin-labeled EGFR probe, and 10 μg poly (deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic) acid sodium (Sigma-Aldrich) in 500 μL HKMG buffer at 4°C overnight. Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose beads (20 μL; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) were then added, and the samples were incubated at 4°C for 1 hour. The immunoprecipitates were collected by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The pellets were washed twice with 1 mL 1× phosphate-buffered saline by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C. After a final wash, the pellet was resuspended in 20 μL 1× electrophoresis sample buffer (Bio-Rad), and the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means ± SD. Differences between two groups were determined by a two-tailed t-test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank) was used for mortality analysis. The statistical analyses were performed using Sigma Stat software version 3.5 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Liver-Specific Deletion of Smo Enhances Fas-Induced Liver Injury
To produce mice with Smo LKO, Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre+/− mice were crossed with Smoflox/flox mice (Figure 1A). The resulting Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre+/− offsprings were used as Smo LKO mice; their matched littermates (Smoflox/flox:Alb-Cre−/− and Smoflox/wt:Alb-Cre−/−) were used as controls. To assess whether liver-specific deletion of Smo would affect Fas-induced acute liver injury, 8-week–old male Smo LKO and matched control mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of the anti-Fas antibody Jo2 (0.30 μg/g of body weight), and the animals were closely monitored for survival. The Smo LKO mice exhibited significantly higher mortality compared with the control mice (P = 0.01) (Figure 1B). To further document the extent of liver injury, separate groups of Smo LKO and matched control mice were subjected to Jo2 treatment (at the same dose), and the animals were sacrificed at 3 hours to obtain blood and liver tissue samples. Although the livers of control mice appeared normal on gross examination, the livers of Smo LKO mice turned dark red (Figure 1C). Histologic examination of the liver tissues under hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed more prominent parenchymal hemorrhage and more hepatocyte apoptosis in the livers of Smo LKO mice compared with the livers of control mice (Figure 1C). Accordingly, the levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase in Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice were significantly higher than in Jo2-treated control mice (Figure 1D). These findings demonstrate that Smo deletion in hepatocytes enhances Fas-induced liver injury.
Activation of Fas by its ligand (or antibody Jo2) is known to cause the formation of the death-inducing signaling complex, which recruits and activates caspase-8, leading to subsequent activation of caspase-3/7 and caspase-9; such caspase cascade activation finally results in apoptosis. Therefore, apoptotic parameters were further analyzed in the liver tissues harvested from Jo2-treatd Smo LKO and control mice (3 hours after Jo2 injection). The number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling–positive hepatocytes in Smo KO livers was significantly higher compared with control livers (Figure 2A). Under immunohistochemical staining for cleaved caspase-3, the Smo KO livers showed a higher percentage of cleaved caspase-3–positive hepatocytes and stronger staining intensity compared with the control livers (Figure 2B). Under Western blot analysis, the Smo KO livers showed more prominent cleavage of caspases 3/7, 8, and 9 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase compared with the control livers (Figure 2C). These findings indicate more prominent caspase activation in the liver tissues from Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice compared with Jo2-treated control mice.
Figure 2.
Smo deletion enhances Fas-induced caspase activation. A:Left panels show terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) analysis of liver tissues from Smo LKO and control mice (sacrificed 3 hours after Jo2 injection). Right panel shows quantification of TUNEL-positive hepatocytes. B: Left panels show immunohistochemical stain for cleaved caspase-3. Right panel shows quantification of cleaved caspase-3–positive hepatocytes. C: Western blot analysis for caspases 3, 7, 8, and 9 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in the liver tissues. D: Hh signaling pathway is activated in the control mice but not in Smo LKO mice after Jo2 injection. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis for Smo, Ptch1, and Gli1 mRNAs in the liver tissues. Data are expressed as means ± SD (A, B, and D). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×100 (A and B). GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; WT, wild type.
Hepatocyte Hh Signaling Is Activated during Fas-Induced Apoptosis
Although Hh signaling is inactive in normal adult livers, this pathway becomes activated during acute and chronic liver injuries, manifested by enhanced production of Hh ligands and their target genes4, 7, 13 as well as increased accumulation of Hh ligand-producing cells and Hh-responsive target cells.14, 31 There are several types of liver cells that are known to be responsive to Hh ligand, including hepatic stellate cells and fibroblasts,32 liver progenitor cells,5 and cholangiocytes33, 34; however, hepatocytes have been considered as Hh nonresponsive cells.16 Jo2 treatment significantly increased hepatic expression of Smo and its downstream targets Gli1 and Ptch1, in control mice; in contrast, this phenomenon was not observed in Smo LKO mice (Figure 2D). These findings demonstrate that Hh signaling in the liver becomes activated in the setting of Fas-induced liver injury and that hepatocytes represent a noticeable population of cells that exhibit Hh activation under this condition.
Smo Deletion Enhances Fas-Induced Liver Injury through Inhibition of the NF-κB/EGFR/Akt Pathway
Western blot analysis was performed to determine the levels of key molecules implicated in Fas-induced liver injury. The levels of NF-κB, p-NF-κB (Ser536), EGFR, and p-Akt (Ser473) were decreased in the liver tissues from Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice compared with Jo2-treated control mice (Figure 3A). Given the documented roles of these proteins in protection against Fas-induced apoptosis,35, 36, 37, 38, 39 it is likely that reduction of these molecules in Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice may contribute to the exacerbation of liver injury seen in these animals. By using the transcription binding tool Genomatix MatInspector, a putative NF-κB binding site was identified within −511 to −502 of the EGFR promoter. A DNA-protein pull-down assay showed that Jo2 treatment enhanced the binding of hepatic NF-κB to this motif in control mice, but not in Smo LKO mice (Figure 3B). These observations support the role of NF-κB for regulation of EGFR expression in the liver. Thus, decreased NF-κB activity may be a mechanism for reduced EGFR in Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice.
Figure 3.
The impact of Smo deletion on the NF-κB/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/Akt pathway. Smo LKO and control mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.30 μg/g of body weight Jo2. The mice were sacrificed 3 hours after Jo2 injection. A: The liver tissue lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis for indicated molecules. B: The liver nuclear extracts were processed for DNA-protein pull-down analysis. 4E-BP1, 4E-binding protein 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; WT, wild type.
Consistent with the well-documented Akt phosphorylation by the EGFR pathway, the level of p-Akt (Ser473) in the livers of Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice was lower compared with Jo2-treated control mice (Figure 3A). Accordingly, the phosphorylation of the Akt downstream target, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1,40 was markedly decreased in Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice compared with Jo2-treated control mice (Figure 3A). The above findings suggest that Smo deficiency may enhance Fas-induced liver injury through inhibition of the NF-κB/EGFR/Akt pathway.
Smo Deletion Enhances Fas-Induced Apoptosis in Hepatocytes, in Vitro
To determine the role of Smo in Fas-induced hepatocyte apoptosis, primary hepatocytes were isolated from the Smo LKO and control mice, according to previously described methods.31 The hepatocyte cultures were treated with Jo2, 0.50 μg/mL, plus cycloheximide, 10 μg/mL, for 4 hours to determine parameters of apoptosis. Jo2 treatment induced more prominent apoptosis in Smo KO hepatocytes compared with control hepatocytes, as determined by quantitative analysis for apoptotic cells under Hoechst staining (Figure 4A). Accordingly, Jo2-induced increase of caspase-3/7 and caspase-8 activities was more prominent in Smo KO hepatocytes compared with control hepatocytes (Figure 4B). These findings demonstrate that deletion of Smo in hepatocytes exacerbates Fas-induced apoptosis, in vitro.
Figure 4.
Smo deletion enhances Fas-induced apoptosis in hepatocytes. Primary hepatocytes were isolated from Smo LKO and control mice. The cells were treated with Jo2 (0.50 μg/mL) plus cycloheximide (CHX; 10 μg/mL) for 4 hours. A:Left panels show representative Hoechst staining. Right panel shows quantitative analysis for apoptotic cells under Hoechst staining. B: Caspase-3/7 and caspase-8 activities. C: Primary hepatocytes were isolated from Smo LKO and control mice, and the cells were treated with 0.50 μg/mL Jo2 plus 10 μg/mL CHX for 2 or 4 hours. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed to determine the mRNA levels of Smo, Ptch1, and Gli1. D: Western blot analysis to detect the levels of indicated proteins in hepatocytes with indicated treatments. Data are expressed as means ± SD (A–C). ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×200 (A). 4E-BP1, 4E-binding protein 1; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; WT, wild type.
The Levels of Hh and Related Signaling Molecules in Hepatocytes
The expression levels of Hh signaling molecules in hepatocytes isolated from Smo LKO and control mice were further studied. The control hepatocytes treated with Jo2 showed up-regulation of Smo, Ptch1, and Gli1 mRNAs; however, this effect was not observed in Smo KO hepatocytes under the same treatment (Figure 4C). These findings further support the notion that hepatocyte Hh signaling can be activated in the setting of Fas-induced injury. Consistent with these observations, Jo2 treatment led to reduction of NF-κB, p-NF-κB (Ser536), EGFR, p-Akt (Ser473), and p-4E-binding protein 1 in Smo-deleted hepatocytes, but not in control hepatocytes (Figure 4D).
Overexpression of NF-κB Prevents Fas-Induced Liver Injury in Smo LKO Mice
To further investigate the role of NF-κB, an active component of NF-κB was delivered to the livers of Smo LKO and control mice via hydrodynamic gene delivery. This was achieved by injecting 10% volume/body weight of naked p65 plasmid (20 μg/mL) or control empty plasmid (20 μg/mL) to the mice within 10 seconds through tail vein, as previously described.41, 42, 43 Successful expression of p65 in the livers was confirmed by Western blot analysis (24 hours after injection) (Figure 5D). Thus, in subsequent experiments, 24 hours after hydrodynamic tail vein injection of p65 or control plasmid, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with Jo2 (0.30 μg/g of body weight), and the animals were sacrificed 3 hours after Jo2 injection. NF-κB overexpression attenuated Fas-induced liver injury in Smo LKO mice, as documented by histopathological examination of the liver tissues (Figure 5A), measurement for serum transaminases (Figure 5B), and Western blot analysis for cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, caspase-8, and caspase-3 in the liver tissues (Figure 5C). These data indicate that NF-κB overexpression can effectively prevent Fas-induced liver injury in Smo LKO mice. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that adult hepatocytes are responsive to Hh signaling in the setting of Fas-induced liver injury and that such an alteration leads to activation of NF-κB/EGFR/Akt, which counteracts Fas-induced hepatocyte apoptosis (Figure 5E).
Figure 5.
Overexpression of NF-κB prevents Fas-induced liver injury in Smo LKO mice. A: NF-κB overexpression prevents Fas-induced liver tissue injury in Smo LKO mice. Twenty-four hours after hydrodynamic tail vein injection of NF-κB or control plasmid, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with Jo2 (0.30 μg/g of body weight). Three hours after Jo2 injection, the mice were sacrificed and the liver tissues were obtained and processed for histologic evaluation (hematoxylin and eosin staining). B: Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) analysis. C: Western blot analysis for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), caspase-8, and caspase-3. D: The efficiency of NF-κB expression in mice receiving tail vein hydrodynamic injection of NF-κB expression plasmid (20 μg/mL). E: Illustration of hepatocyte Hh signaling in Fas-induced liver injury. Data are expressed as means ± SD (B). ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×100 (A). EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; WT, wild type.
Discussion
Fas (CD95/apoptosis antigen 1)–mediated apoptosis has been implicated in a broad spectrum of liver diseases from autoimmune disorders, to viral hepatitis, to fulminant hepatic failure.44, 45, 46 The expression of Fas receptor and Fas ligand is up-regulated in patients with various liver diseases, including chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection,47 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,34 alcoholic liver disease,48 drug- or acetaminophen-induced liver injury,49 and acute liver failure.50 There is clinical evidence indicating that Fas-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis is a prominent feature of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and an important trigger for the induction of human fulminant hepatic failure.34, 50 In the current study, we evaluated the effect of hepatocyte Smo on Fas-induced liver injury. Our findings provide novel evidence for an important role of Hh signaling in hepatocytes for prevention of Fas-induced apoptosis and liver injury via activation of the NF-κB/EGFR/Akt pathway. This assertion is based on the following lines of evidence: i) deletion of hepatocyte Smo significantly enhanced Fas-induced apoptosis, in vivo and in vitro; ii) the Hh signaling pathway became activated in the livers and hepatocytes from control mice treated with Jo2, whereas these phenomena were absent in the liver tissues and hepatocytes from Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice; and iii) the NF-κB/EGFR/Akt pathway was inhibited in the liver tissues and hepatocytes from Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate Smo-mediated activation of Hh signaling in hepatocytes, which counteracts Fas-induced liver injury. Besides Fas-induced liver injury, our further experiments with the Smo LKO mice reveal that hepatocyte Smo also protects against lipopolysaccharide/galactosamine-induced liver injury (Supplemental Figures S1 and S2). Our results suggest that Hh signaling activation in hepatocytes is an important survival mechanism in response to liver injury. Conceivably, this mechanism may have important implications in the pathogenesis of human liver diseases characterized by hepatocyte injury.
Hh signaling may be initiated via autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine mechanisms, depending on the source of Hh ligands.1 After binding with Hh ligands, canonical Hh pathway activation requires Smo translocation to the primary cilium and results in Gli transcription factors entering into the nuclei to regulate gene expression.51 Primary cilium has two roles in Hh signaling: to receive Hh and to initiate signal transduction in responding cells.52 However, murine or human hepatocytes have no cilia.53 Furthermore, adult healthy hepatocytes have been found to express only a tiny amount of Hh ligands,27 Ptch and Gli1.18 In contrast, the nonparenchymal cells (including hepatic stellate cells and natural killer T cells) and cholangiocytes can produce Hh ligands.1 Thus, in the adult liver, Hh signaling is lower in hepatocytes compared with the nonparenchymal cells. Partly because of these distinct cellular features, research on Hh signaling in the adult liver has focused predominantly on nonparenchymal cells, with hepatocytes being largely neglected or even considered as nonresponding.27 In this context, a recent study describes that there is cilia-independent but Smo-dependent signaling in mature healthy hepatocytes and Hh signaling is active in healthy mature hepatocytes.29 Herein, the Hh pathway was shown to be activated in hepatocytes in the setting of Fas-induced liver injury, as evidenced by enhanced expression of Smo, Ptch1, and Gli1 in Jo2-treated control mice. Deletion of hepatocyte Smo enhanced Fas-induced apoptosis, both in vivo and in vitro. Hh signaling activation in hepatocytes seems to be an important adaptive response to counterbalance Fas-induced apoptosis and liver injury.
Hh signaling has been shown to activate NF-κB, and the effect has been reported to be dependent on Smo; however, whether Gli is required for NF-κB activation appears to be context dependent.54, 55 For example, in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Smo contributes to NF-κB activation through recruiting G-protein subunits Gαi and Gα12.54 In pancreatic ductal adeonocarcinoma, Smo-mediated activation of Gli has been shown to regulate I-κ-B kinase ε, which leads to NF-κB activation.55 In our system, a reduced level of NF-κB was observed in Jo2-treated Smo LKO mice compared with control mice, which supports the role of Smo for NF-κB activation in the liver. The role of NF-κB in mediating the effect of Smo in the liver is further supported by the finding that NF-κB overexpression prevented Fas-induced liver injury in Smo LKO mice. The exact mechanism by which Smo regulates NF-κB activity in the liver remains to be further defined.
In summary, the current study provides novel evidence that, in the setting of liver injury, hepatocytes undergo phenotype change with up-regulation of Smoothened, such that hepatocytes are switched from Hh-nonresponsive to Hh-responsive status. Our findings suggest that hepatocytes can become responsive to Hh ligands during liver injury and that activation of hepatocyte Hh signaling may be a key reactive response in hepatocyte survival and tissue repair.
Footnotes
Supported by NIH grants CA106280 and CA102325 (T.W.).
Y.W. and W.C. contributed equally to this work.
Disclosures: None declared.
Supplemental material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.07.018.
Supplemental Data
Supplemental Figure S1.
Liver-specific Smo KO exacerbates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/D-galactosamine (GalN)–induced liver injury. Wild-type (WT) and Smo LKO mice were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (30 ng/g body weight) plus D-GalN (800 μg/g body weight). A: Survival curve of mice after LPS/GalN administration (P < 0.05, log-rank test). B: The mice were sacrificed at 4 or 7 hours after LPS/GalN injection. Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin staining. C: Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Data are expressed as means ± SD (C). n = 6 (A). ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×100 (B).
Supplemental Figure S2.
Liver-specific Smo KO exacerbates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/D-galactosamine (GalN)–induced liver apoptosis. Wild-type (WT) and Smo LKO mice were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (30 ng/g body weight) plus D-GalN (800 μg/g body weight). The mice were sacrificed at 4 or 7 hours after LPS/GalN injection. A: Immunohistochemical staining of cleaved caspase-3. B: Quantification of cleaved caspase-3–positive hepatocytes. C: Western blot analysis to detect poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and caspase cleavage at 4 and 7 hours after LPS/GalN injection. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a loading control. Data are expressed as means ± SD (B). ∗∗P < 0.01. Original magnification, ×100 (A).
References
- 1.Omenetti A., Choi S., Michelotti G., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog signaling in the liver. J Hepatol. 2011;54:366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jung Y., McCall S.J., Li Y.X., Diehl A.M. Bile ductules and stromal cells express hedgehog ligands and/or hedgehog target genes in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;45:1091–1096. doi: 10.1002/hep.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Omenetti A., Popov Y., Jung Y., Choi S.S., Witek R.P., Yang L., Brown K.D., Schuppan D., Diehl A.M. The hedgehog pathway regulates remodelling responses to biliary obstruction in rats. Gut. 2008;57:1275–1282. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.148619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Omenetti A., Yang L., Li Y.X., McCall S.J., Jung Y., Sicklick J.K., Huang J., Choi S., Suzuki A., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog-mediated mesenchymal-epithelial interactions modulate hepatic response to bile duct ligation. Lab Invest. 2007;87:499–514. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sicklick J.K., Li Y.X., Melhem A., Schmelzer E., Zdanowicz M., Huang J., Caballero M., Fair J.H., Ludlow J.W., McClelland R.E., Reid L.M., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog signaling maintains resident hepatic progenitors throughout life. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G859–G870. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00456.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fleig S.V., Choi S.S., Yang L., Jung Y., Omenetti A., VanDongen H.M., Huang J., Sicklick J.K., Diehl A.M. Hepatic accumulation of hedgehog-reactive progenitors increases with severity of fatty liver damage in mice. Lab Invest. 2007;87:1227–1239. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jung Y., Witek R.P., Syn W.K., Choi S.S., Omenetti A., Premont R., Guy C.D., Diehl A.M. Signals from dying hepatocytes trigger growth of liver progenitors. Gut. 2010;59:655–665. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.204354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Syn W.K., Choi S.S., Liaskou E., Karaca G.F., Agboola K.M., Oo Y.H., Mi Z., Pereira T.A., Zdanowicz M., Malladi P., Chen Y., Moylan C., Jung Y., Bhattacharya S.D., Teaberry V., Omenetti A., Abdelmalek M.F., Guy C.D., Adams D.H., Kuo P.C., Michelotti G.A., Whitington P.F., Diehl A.M. Osteopontin is induced by hedgehog pathway activation and promotes fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2011;53:106–115. doi: 10.1002/hep.23998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen Y., Choi S.S., Michelotti G.A., Chan I.S., Swiderska-Syn M., Karaca G.F., Xie G., Moylan C.A., Garibaldi F., Premont R., Suliman H.B., Piantadosi C.A., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog controls hepatic stellate cell fate by regulating metabolism. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1319–1329.e1-11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bohinc B.N., Diehl A.M. Mechanisms of disease progression in NASH: new paradigms. Clin Liver Dis. 2012;16:549–565. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Syn W.K., Agboola K.M., Swiderska M., Michelotti G.A., Liaskou E., Pang H., Xie G., Philips G., Chan I.S., Karaca G.F., Pereira Tde A., Chen Y., Mi Z., Kuo P.C., Choi S.S., Guy C.D., Abdelmalek M.F., Diehl A.M. NKT-associated hedgehog and osteopontin drive fibrogenesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2012;61:1323–1329. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choi S.S., Syn W.K., Karaca G.F., Omenetti A., Moylan C.A., Witek R.P., Agboola K.M., Jung Y., Michelotti G.A., Diehl A.M. Leptin promotes the myofibroblastic phenotype in hepatic stellate cells by activating the hedgehog pathway. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:36551–36560. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.168542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ochoa B., Syn W.K., Delgado I., Karaca G.F., Jung Y., Wang J., Zubiaga A.M., Fresnedo O., Omenetti A., Zdanowicz M., Choi S.S., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog signaling is critical for normal liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice. Hepatology. 2010;51:1712–1723. doi: 10.1002/hep.23525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guy C.D., Suzuki A., Zdanowicz M., Abdelmalek M.F., Burchette J., Unalp A., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog pathway activation parallels histologic severity of injury and fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2012;55:1711–1721. doi: 10.1002/hep.25559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Syn W.K., Oo Y.H., Pereira T.A., Karaca G.F., Jung Y., Omenetti A., Witek R.P., Choi S.S., Guy C.D., Fearing C.M., Teaberry V., Pereira F.E., Adams D.H., Diehl A.M. Accumulation of natural killer T cells in progressive nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;51:1998–2007. doi: 10.1002/hep.23599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jung Y., Brown K.D., Witek R.P., Omenetti A., Yang L., Vandongen M., Milton R.J., Hines I.N., Rippe R.A., Spahr L., Rubbia-Brandt L., Diehl A.M. Accumulation of hedgehog-responsive progenitors parallels alcoholic liver disease severity in mice and humans. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1532–1543. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang Y., Han C., Lu L., Magliato S., Wu T. Hedgehog signaling pathway regulates autophagy in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2013;58:995–1010. doi: 10.1002/hep.26394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sicklick J.K., Li Y.X., Jayaraman A., Kannangai R., Qi Y., Vivekanandan P., Ludlow J.W., Owzar K., Chen W., Torbenson M.S., Diehl A.M. Dysregulation of the hedgehog pathway in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:748–757. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Patil M.A., Zhang J., Ho C., Cheung S.T., Fan S.T., Chen X. Hedgehog signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:111–117. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.1.2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang S., He J., Zhang X., Bian Y., Yang L., Xie G., Zhang K., Tang W., Stelter A.A., Wang Q., Zhang H., Xie J. Activation of the hedgehog pathway in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:1334–1340. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pereira Tde A., Witek R.P., Syn W.K., Choi S.S., Bradrick S., Karaca G.F., Agboola K.M., Jung Y., Omenetti A., Moylan C.A., Yang L., Fernandez-Zapico M.E., Jhaveri R., Shah V.H., Pereira F.E., Diehl A.M. Viral factors induce hedgehog pathway activation in humans with viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2010;90:1690–1703. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Villanueva A., Newell P., Chiang D.Y., Friedman S.L., Llovet J.M. Genomics and signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27:55–76. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Philips G.M., Chan I.S., Swiderska M., Schroder V.T., Guy C., Karaca G.F., Moylan C., Venkatraman T., Feuerlein S., Syn W.K., Jung Y., Witek R.P., Choi S., Michelotti G.A., Rangwala F., Merkle E., Lascola C., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog signaling antagonist promotes regression of both liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in a murine model of primary liver cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alcedo J., Ayzenzon M., Von Ohlen T., Noll M., Hooper J.E. The Drosophila smoothened gene encodes a seven-pass membrane protein, a putative receptor for the hedgehog signal. Cell. 1996;86:221–232. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shevde L.A., Samant R.S. Nonclassical hedgehog-GLI signaling and its clinical implications. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Robbins D.J., Fei D.L., Riobo N.A. The hedgehog signal transduction network. Sci Signal. 2012;5:re6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Matz-Soja M., Hovhannisyan A., Gebhardt R. Hedgehog signalling pathway in adult liver: a major new player in hepatocyte metabolism and zonation? Med Hypotheses. 2013;80:589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rangwala F., Guy C.D., Lu J., Suzuki A., Burchette J.L., Abdelmalek M.F., Chen W., Diehl A.M. Increased production of sonic hedgehog by ballooned hepatocytes. J Pathol. 2011;224:401–410. doi: 10.1002/path.2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matz-Soja M., Aleithe S., Marbach E., Bottger J., Arnold K., Schmidt-Heck W., Kratzsch J., Gebhardt R. Hepatic hedgehog signaling contributes to the regulation of IGF1 and IGFBP1 serum levels. Cell Commun Signal. 2014;12:11. doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-12-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen W., Han C., Zhang J., Song K., Wang Y., Wu T. miR-150 deficiency protects against FAS-induced acute liver injury in mice through regulation of AKT. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li W.C., Ralphs K.L., Tosh D. Isolation and culture of adult mouse hepatocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;633:185–196. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-019-5_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choi S.S., Omenetti A., Witek R.P., Moylan C.A., Syn W.K., Jung Y., Yang L., Sudan D.L., Sicklick J.K., Michelotti G.A., Rojkind M., Diehl A.M. Hedgehog pathway activation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions during myofibroblastic transformation of rat hepatic cells in culture and cirrhosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297:G1093–G1106. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00292.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huh C.G., Factor V.M., Sanchez A., Uchida K., Conner E.A., Thorgeirsson S.S. Hepatocyte growth factor/c-met signaling pathway is required for efficient liver regeneration and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4477–4482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306068101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Feldstein A.E., Canbay A., Angulo P., Taniai M., Burgart L.J., Lindor K.D., Gores G.J. Hepatocyte apoptosis and fas expression are prominent features of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:437–443. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00907-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hatano E., Bennett B.L., Manning A.M., Qian T., Lemasters J.J., Brenner D.A. NF-kappaB stimulates inducible nitric oxide synthase to protect mouse hepatocytes from TNF-alpha- and Fas-mediated apoptosis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1251–1262. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.23239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li G., Chen W., Han C., Wu T. Cytosolic phospholipase A(2)alpha protects against Fas- but not LPS-induced liver injury. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1281–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li P., Jayarama S., Ganesh L., Mordi D., Carr R., Kanteti P., Hay N., Prabhakar B.S. Akt-phosphorylated mitogen-activated kinase-activating death domain protein (MADD) inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis by blocking Fas-associated death domain (FADD) association with death receptor 4. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:22713–22722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.105692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hatano E., Brenner D.A. Akt protects mouse hepatocytes from TNF-alpha- and Fas-mediated apoptosis through NK-kappa B activation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G1357–G1368. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.6.G1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jones R.G., Elford A.R., Parsons M.J., Wu L., Krawczyk C.M., Yeh W.C., Hakem R., Rottapel R., Woodgett J.R., Ohashi P.S. CD28-dependent activation of protein kinase B/Akt blocks Fas-mediated apoptosis by preventing death-inducing signaling complex assembly. J Exp Med. 2002;196:335–348. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gingras A.C., Kennedy S.G., O'Leary M.A., Sonenberg N., Hay N. 4E-BP1, a repressor of mRNA translation, is phosphorylated and inactivated by the Akt(PKB) signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 1998;12:502–513. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.4.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu F., Song Y., Liu D. Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther. 1999;6:1258–1266. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang G., Budker V., Wolff J.A. High levels of foreign gene expression in hepatocytes after tail vein injections of naked plasmid DNA. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:1735–1737. doi: 10.1089/10430349950017734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tsoulfas G., Takahashi Y., Liu D., Yagnik G., Wu T., Murase N., Geller D.A. Hydrodynamic plasmid DNA gene therapy model in liver transplantation. J Surg Res. 2006;135:242–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fox C.K., Furtwaengler A., Nepomuceno R.R., Martinez O.M., Krams S.M. Apoptotic pathways in primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis. Liver. 2001;21:272–279. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2001.021004272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rivero M., Crespo J., Fabrega E., Casafont F., Mayorga M., Gomez-Fleitas M., Pons-Romero F. Apoptosis mediated by the Fas system in the fulminant hepatitis by hepatitis B virus. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9:107–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00338.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ogasawara J., Watanabe-Fukunaga R., Adachi M., Matsuzawa A., Kasugai T., Kitamura Y., Itoh N., Suda T., Nagata S. Lethal effect of the anti-Fas antibody in mice. Nature. 1993;364:806–809. doi: 10.1038/364806a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lapinski T.W., Kowalczuk O., Prokopowicz D., Chyczewski L. Serum concentration of sFas and sFasL in healthy HBsAg carriers, chronic viral hepatitis B and C patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:3650–3653. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i24.3650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Taieb J., Mathurin P., Poynard T., Gougerot-Pocidalo M.A., Chollet-Martin S. Raised plasma soluble Fas and Fas-ligand in alcoholic liver disease. Lancet. 1998;351:1930–1931. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78614-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rutherford A.E., Hynan L.S., Borges C.B., Forcione D.G., Blackard J.T., Lin W., Gorman A.R., Shaikh O.S., Reuben A., Harrison E., Reddy K.R., Le W.M., Chung R.T., ALF Study Group Serum apoptosis markers in acute liver failure: a pilot study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1477–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ryo K., Kamogawa Y., Ikeda I., Yamauchi K., Yonehara S., Nagata S., Hayashi N. Significance of Fas antigen-mediated apoptosis in human fulminant hepatic failure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2047–2055. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Grzelak C.A., Martelotto L.G., Sigglekow N.D., Patkunanathan B., Ajami K., Calabro S.R., Dwyer B.J., Tirnitz-Parker J.E., Watkins D.N., Warner F.J., Shackel N.A., McCaughan G.W. The intrahepatic signalling niche of hedgehog is defined by primary cilia positive cells during chronic liver injury. J Hepatol. 2014;60:143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kornberg T.B. The contrasting roles of primary cilia and cytonemes in Hh signaling. Dev Biol. 2014;394:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Grisham J.W., Nopanitaya W., Compagno J., Nagel A.E. Scanning electron microscopy of normal rat liver: the surface structure of its cells and tissue components. Am J Anat. 1975;144:295–321. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001440304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Qu C., Liu Y., Kunkalla K., Singh R.R., Blonska M., Lin X., Agarwal N.K., Vega F. Trimeric G protein-CARMA1 axis links smoothened, the hedgehog receptor transducer, to NF-kappaB activation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2013;121:4718–4728. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-470153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rajurkar M., De Jesus-Monge W.E., Driscoll D.R., Appleman V.A., Huang H., Cotton J.L., Klimstra D.S., Zhu L.J., Simin K., Xu L., McMahon A.P., Lewis B.C., Mao J. The activity of Gli transcription factors is essential for Kras-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E1038–E1047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114168109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







