Skip to main content
Biomedical Engineering Letters logoLink to Biomedical Engineering Letters
. 2018 Apr 21;8(2):183–191. doi: 10.1007/s13534-018-0068-1

Multimodal photoacoustic imaging as a tool for sentinel lymph node identification and biopsy guidance

Haemin Kim 1, Jin Ho Chang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6208518  PMID: 30603202

Abstract

As a minimally invasive method, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in conjunction with guidance methods is the standard method to determine cancer metastasis in breast. The desired guidance methods for SLNB should be capable of precise SLN localization for accurate diagnosis of micro-metastases at an early stage of cancer progression and thus facilitate reducing the number of SLN biopsies for minimal surgical complications. For this, high sensitivity to the administered dyes, high spatial and contrast resolutions, deep imaging depth, and real-time imaging capability are pivotal requirements. Currently, various methods have been used for SLNB guidance, each with their own advantages and disadvantages, but no methods meet the requirements. In this review, we discuss the conventional SLNB guidance methods in this perspective. In addition, we focus on the role of the PA imaging modality on real-time SLN identification and biopsy guidance. In particular, PA-based hybrid imaging methods for precise SLN identification and efficient biopsy guidance are introduced, and their unique features, advantages, and disadvantages are discussed.

Keywords: Sentinel lymph node, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Photoacoustic imaging, Ultrasound imaging, Fluorescence imaging, Hybrid imaging, Contrast agents

Introduction

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging has been attracting much attention as an emerging imaging modality that has the ability to provide the advantages of an optical contrast and ultrasonic resolution. This imaging modality rests on the photoacoustic effect. Optical beam such as laser with a particular wavelength induces the vibrational and rotational oscillation of a specific molecule (e.g., hemoglobin in blood) that absorbs the incident laser pulses. This leads to converting the delivered energy into heat and subsequently transient thermoelastic expansion, thus generating acoustic waves (i.e., PA signals). Since the frequency range of PA signals is the ultrasonic range, ultrasound (US) transducers can detect the PA signals to construct PA images. The intensity of PA signal is linearly proportional to the optical absorption coefficient of a molecule. PA imaging is categorized into PA microscopy (PAM), PA tomography (PAT) and cross-sectional PA imaging (CS-PAI), depending on signal detection scheme. Among them, CS-PAI is a viable method for clinical applications in real time, and it can be implemented by the minimal modification of a current ultrasound scanner [14]; PA and US images are inherently easy to be co-registered together, and thus this dual imaging modality can simultaneously provide anatomical and functional information. Figure 1 illustrates the process of PA signal generation and the detailed theoretical background of PA imaging can be found in [5].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Conceptual diagram describing the steps of photoacoustic signal generation

The most popular application of PA imaging is blood vessel imaging and measurement of oxygen saturation [68], which is possible because hemoglobin is an excellent endogenous chromophore; it has the ability to highly absorb laser energy with wavelengths in a range of 400–600 ns, compared to other tissue components. In addition, oxygenated- and deoxygenated-hemoglobin in blood have different characteristic absorption spectra in response to incident laser. By using the optical absorption characteristics of lipid, the PA image of lipid core in atherosclerotic plaques was acquired [9]. Additionally, combined intravascular US and PA imaging transducers were developed for the real-time visualization of stent [10]. As a new clinical application, the possibility of the real-time imaging of breast microcalcifications, an early indicator of breast cancer, was demonstrated [1113], and it was shown that multispectral PA imaging has the potential for differentiating cholesterol and neoplastic polyps (i.e., benign and malignant polyps) of the gallbladder [14]. Since a few endogenous chromophores exist in the body, various exogenous chromophores (i.e., PA contrast agents) based on non-biological materials such as gold nanoparticles, nanocages, and carbon nanotubes have been developed to expand the potential clinical applications of PA imaging [1520]. In addition, biological material-based exogenous chromophores have been proposed as biocompatible PA contrast agents [2123]. In conjunction with these contrast agents, it was demonstrated that PA imaging can be used for cancer detection, sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification, and image-guided therapy.

Among those applications, this review paper focuses on the role of the PA imaging modality on real-time SLN identification and SLN biopsy guidance. Especially, PA-based hybrid imaging methods for precise SLN identification and efficient SLN biopsy guidance are introduced and their unique features, advantages, and disadvantages are discussed. In the beginning, SLN identification and conventional SLN biopsy guidance methods are described to help the general readers understand the background of this field and the reason why multimodal photoacoustic imaging is attractive as a tool for SLN identification and biopsy guidance.

Sentinel lymph node identification and biopsy guidance methods

When tumor cells grow, new blood vessels and lymphatic vessels are created. At a certain stage, tumor cells have shed into the vasculature from the primary tumor and circulate in the bloodstream. It is known that the first target organ primarily reached by the circulating tumor cells is lymph nodes close to the tumor site. This lymph node is called sentinel lymph node. Therefore, it is important to identify SLN and detect the tumor cells inside the SLN to judge whether tumor metastasis occurs or not. For this, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been conducted to diagnose tumor metastasis [2427]. However, this conventional method may cause serious complications such as lymphedema, nerve injury, seroma formation, numbness or limited arm movement [28]. As a minimally-invasive method, SLN biopsy (SLNB) in conjunction with an imaging modality or a signal detector for SLN identification is widely used in clinics to alleviate the surgical complications by ALND [29].

SLNB is carried out through four steps as depicted in Fig. 2. As a first step, an exogenous dye or a radioactive tracer is injected around a primary tumor site. The injected material flows into SLN of which identification is conducted by means of visualization of the injected material or detecting signal from the material. After the identification, the suspicious SLN is surgically resected and subsequently examined by histopathology. Based on histopathological result, additional diagnosis including ALND are determined if the result is positive. For precise and effective SLNB, pre- and intra-operative SLNB guidance, which plays a role of locating SNL accurately and identify multiple basin drainages, is crucial [30]. Currently, several SLNB guidance methods are used in clinics, as summarized in Table 1, each with their own advantages and disadvantages.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Illustration of the general process of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): a injection of an exogenous contrast (EC) agent or a radioactive tracer into the primary tumor site and b identification of SLN by means of detecting signal from the injected material. c A suspicious SLN reached by the injected material can be distinguished from lymph nodes (LNs) and is resected with the help of imaging guidance. The final step is to conduct histopathology of excised SLN to confirm whether tumor metastasis occurs or not

Table 1.

Comparison of features of the conventional pre- and intra-operative SLNB guidance methods and photoacoustic imaging method

Method Spatial resolution Image/sensing depth Exogenous contrast agent Ionization Radiation Performance
LS 20 mm Very deep Isosulfan blue, patent blue V, Evans blue Yes Preoperative
SPECT 500 μs
~ 2 mm
Very deep Radiometal (such as 99mTc and 111In) Yes Preoperative
CT 20 μs
~ 300 μs
Very deep Iodinated contrast agent Yes Preoperative
PET 1–2 mm Very deep Radioactive contrast agents (Gallium, 64Cu-ATSM, Technetium-99 m Yes Preoperative
MRI 10 μs
~ 100 μs
Very deep Gadolinium, paramagnetic iron oxide No Preoperative
BD Unaided visual resolution ~ 1 mm Methylene blue No Intraoperative
RD > 10 mm > 50 mm Radioactive tracer Yes Intraoperative
FL ~ 1 mm ~ 5 mm ICG, MB No Intraoperative
US 400 μs ~ 20 cm Micro-bubble No Preoperative and intraoperative
PA 800 μs ~ 7 cm (Gold) NP, ICG, MB, Molecular dyes No Preoperative and intraoperative

Lymphoscintigraphy (LS) is a common method used in clinics for SLN mapping. This method uses gamma emitting radionuclides such as Tc-99 m that is detected for lymph drainage imaging [3133]. Other dyes used for LS are isosulfan blue, patent blue V, Evans blue, and fluorescent dyes that stain live tissues and cells, which is the reason why they are called the vital dye [34]. The vital dyes are used for visualizing overall lymphatic vessels and drainages [35, 36]. The disadvantages of LS are a high risk of radioactive exposure and a poor spatial resolution [3740]. Computed tomography (CT) is a good tool for identification of lymph nodes due to its high spatial resolution [4144], but high radiation dose is a burden on patients and it is difficult to obtain the information about lymphatic flow due to its low temporal resolution [45]. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) with various nanoparticles is capable of visualizing tissue structures with high spatial and contrast resolutions [4649]. However, although CE-MRI can provide the structural and functional information about SLN due to its high spatial resolution (i.e., 10–100 μm) and it is known as a safe method, small SLNs with early-stage micrometastasis is possibly failed for identification [50]. Additionally, CE-MRI is an expensive tool and cannot be used intra-operatively because it is not a real-time imaging modality. Positron emission tomography (PET) is the most sensitive to physiological change due to cancer occurrence, but its low spatial resolution (i.e., 1–2 mm) hampers detection of small SLN [51] and the potential interference from infection and lymph-node inflammation is problematic [52]. Additionally, PET suffers from a high risk of radioactive exposure. In contrast, contrast-enhance ultrasound imaging (CE-US) with microbubble contrast agents has shown promise for SLN identification pre-operatively due to its cost-effectiveness, real-time imaging capability, and good spatial and contrast resolution [53, 54]. In intra-operative assessment, its low contrast resolution without contrast agents and high user dependence make it difficult to be used for accurate SLN identification although its real-time imaging capability is an attractive aspect of biopsy guidance [55]. For intra-operative SLNB guidance, visual identification of injected blue dye (BD) is widely used, but its shallow visibility makes it impossible to identify deep-lying SLNs, especially in obese patients [56, 57]. In contrast, radioactivity detection with a gamma-ray probe (RD) has good depth coverage in SLN identification as well as an excellent SLN identification ratio of up to 93% [56]. Radiation risk and no visual information are the main drawback of this method. Recently, fluorescence (FL) imaging has attracted attention as a SLN identification method because of its high sensitivity to the administered dyes and its wide-field en face imaging capability [58]. In Table 2, the sensitivity and specificity of each method for SLN identification, which are measured in human subjects, are presented.

Table 2.

Sensitivity and specificity of the conventional methods for SLN identification, which were measured in human subjects

Method Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) References
Lymphoscintigraphy 31 100 [34]
PET/CT 85.1 22.7 [59]
MRI 78.6 68.9 [60]
BD 96.8 86.36 [61]
CT 20 22.7 [62]
FL 71 84.6 [63]
US 13.6 96.9 [64]

PA imaging for SLN identification and biopsy guidance

Compared to ALND, SLNB in conjunction with those guidance methods facilitates the reduction of the surgical complications and operation time [6568]. However, the surgical complications still remain as a problem to be solved [69, 70]. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under US imaging guidance has the potential for minimal surgical complications, but it still suffers from a high false-negative rate of 11–20% and highly variable sample rate (0–53%) [71]. The desired SLNB guidance should be capable of precise SLN localization for accurate diagnosis of micro-metastases at an early stage of cancer progression and reducing the number of SLN biopsies for minimal surgical complications. For this, high sensitivity to the administered dyes, high spatial and contrast resolutions, deep imaging depth, and real-time imaging capability are pivotal requirements. The PA imaging modality with various contrast agents is a possible method to meet the requirements.

Like the conventional procedure for SLN identification, PA contrast agents are injected around the primary tumor site before PA imaging. Song et al. [72] reported that methylene blue (MB) can served as a PA contrast agent for SLN identification and the image of SLN located at a depth of up to 30 mm was obtained. Additionally, indocyanine green (ICG) was used for PA imaging of SLN at a depth of 22 mm [73]. These results imply that PA imaging has high possibility of rapid clinical translation for SLN identification with minimal side effects because both MB and ICG are Food and Drug Administration-approved dyes. However, these materials have the drawback of concentration-dependent optical absorbance and high flowing speed [74], which hampers tracking the injected dye over time at an optimal optical absorption. Due to the ability to adjust for high optical absorbance at a desired laser wavelength, gold-based particles have been intensively investigated as PA contrast agents for SLN identification [17, 7577]. To improve biocompatibility, Lee et al. [78] synthesized organic nano-formulated naphthalocyanines for dual-color PA imaging and demonstrated the possibility of dual-color SLN identification. Silica-coated gold nanoplates (Si-AuNPs) were developed to maintain thermodynamic stability that is associated with optical absorbance of particles and typically degraded during continuous PA imaging for SLN identification [79]. Koo et al. [80] developed single-walled carbon nanotubes conjugated with ICG (SWNTs-ICG) to enhance the ability of PA signal induction (i.e., PA signal amplitude four times higher than the conventional SWNTs) for the high contrast image of deep-lying SLNs.

Regardless of whether PA contrast agents are made of non-biological or biological materials, the injection of contrast agents is a burden on both clinicians and patients. In this light, there have been a few attempts to identify SLN and diagnose its metastasis without administering any PA contrast agents. The first study was to diagnose melanoma metastasis in SLNs [81]. The proposed method is based on the fact that melanoma is an endogenous chromophore. Therefore, it is possible to acquire PA signals from metastatic SLNs when the melanoma cells exist in the SLNs, and preliminary experimental results showed the feasibility although further studies are necessary to confirm the usefulness of the proposed method. Another interesting study is that metastatic SLNs can be identified by measuring oxygen saturation in lymph nodes by using spectroscopic PA imaging [82]. In the study, it was found that the metastatic lymph nodes have a considerably low oxygen saturation, compared to the healthy lymph nodes; the P value was 0.018. The experimental results are impressive, but it is unknown whether micro-metastases at an early stage of cancer progression can be diagnosed; a very small number of cancer cells may not significantly affect change in blood oxygen saturation. If this is true, SLNB is still necessary to confirm lymph node metastasis.

PA-based hybrid imaging methods for SLN identification and biopsy guidance

Except blood vessels, PA imaging is not suitable for obtaining the structural information of the organs. Therefore, combining PA imaging with other imaging modalities responsible for anatomic information is beneficial to precise SLN identification. For this purpose, US imaging modality is the best because an ultrasound transducer for PA signal reception is also used for acquiring US images and the same imaging system can be used for both imaging modalities. To this end, PA images can be exploited to visualize the accumulation of injected contrast agent in SLN over time because US images keep providing anatomical information about SLN and surrounding tissues [8385]. Additionally, the combined PA and US imaging system may facilitate precise percutaneous FNAB to extract SLNs [86, 87]; US imaging is responsible for showing anatomic information surrounding the suspicious SLNs and PA imaging is used to locate the SLNs and track the position of a find needle. Recently, carbon nanoparticles-incorporated liquid–gas phase-transition nanodroplets have been developed for PA and US dual imaging of SLNs and photothermal therapy [88]; carbon nanoparticles act as a PA contrast agent and triggers liquid perfluorohexane to gaseous phase after converting light energy into heat. The gaseous perfluorohexane becomes a US contrast agent. In addition, this contrast agent can be used for photothermal therapy because carbon nanoparticles have photothermal-conversion effect. To enhance efficacy of photothermal therapy using this nanodroplets, the dual thermal therapeutic method may be viable [89].

There are a few studies to combine PA imaging and nuclear medicine. For this, the research focus was to develop dual-mode contrast agents. Akers et al. [90] radiolabeled MB with 125I for both PA imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and Liu et al. [91] developed 64CuS-labeled nanoparticles for both PA imaging and positron emission tomography (PET). Clinical translational strategy of this dual-modal contrast agents is that PET-CT (or SPECT-CT) imaging is used in pre-operative assessment of SLNs (i.e., surgical planning) and intra-operative SLN mapping is conducted by PA imaging. However, the risk of radiation exposure still remains as a crucial problem.

In contrast, FL imaging is a safe method because there is no problem associated with ionized radiation. Additionally, both ICG and MB generally used for PA imaging have played a role of contrast agents for FL imaging; several studies demonstrated usefulness of ICG and MB as a contrast agent of combined PA and FL imaging [73, 9294]. Liu et al. [95] developed fluorescent dye-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles for combined near-infrared (NIR) FL and PA imaging for the purpose of SLN mapping. Akers et al. [96] found that FL quenching leads to increased contrast for PA imaging and this finding was used to developed NIR dye-loaded perfluorocarbon-nanoparticles for combined FL and PA imaging of SLNs. Furthermore, Kang et al. [3] have recently reported the implementation of a real-time tri-modal imaging system for combined US, PA, FL imaging and demonstrated that the tri-modal imaging system enables surgeons to take full advantages of the complementary information obtained from the combined images, i.e., precise pre-operative localization of SLNs and intra-operative biopsy guidance [97].

Implications for future research

Most techniques for SLN identification and biopsy guidance inevitably use various exogenous contrast agents. The performance of the agents is one of key factors in determining the sensitivity and specificity of each method for SLN identification (see Table 2). In this respect, there have been many attempts to develop high-performance exogenous contrast agents. For the multimodal PA imaging techniques, especially, a few multimodal contrast agents have been proposed [98100]. However, most of new contrast agents are made from non-biological materials, which has sparked controversy as to whether the non-biological materials are safe for clinical use [101, 102]. It is necessary to focus on the development of exogenous contrast agents based on biological materials for efficient translation of the multimodal PA imaging techniques into clinical practice for SLN identification and biopsy guidance. To increase the clinical usefulness, additionally, developing real-time methods for increasing light penetration is an important research topic [103, 104], although PA imaging allows for a relatively deep imaging depth. This also make it possible to exploit (multimodal) PA imaging in various clinical applications. On the other hand, the translation of a new technique into clinical practice requires changing the conventional workflow, and thus an efficient clinical protocol for SLN identification and biopsy guidance using the multimodal PA imaging should be developed.

Conclusion

PA imaging modality has the advantages of real-time imaging capability, high spatial and contrast resolutions, and non-ionizing signal generation, and it has received much attention in the last decade due to those attractive features. However, PA imaging has less capability of providing anatomical information except blood vessels. Therefore, combining PA and other imaging modalities for complementing the limitation of PA imaging is the best option to take full advantage of PA imaging; we believe that its key application is SLNB guidance requiring precise SLN localization for accurate diagnosis of micro-metastases at an early stage of cancer progression. In the near future, we will see the multimodal photoacoustic imaging that plays an important role in SLNB guidance in clinics.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017R1A2B2002838).

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies conducted by the authors on humans or animals.

References

  • 1.Wang X, Fowlkes JB, Cannata JM, Hu C, Carson PL. Photoacoustic imaging with a commercial ultrasound system and a custom probe. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(3):484–492. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yoon C, Yoo Y, Song TK, Chang JH. Pixel based focusing for photoacoustic and ultrasound dual-modality imaging. Ultrasonics. 2014;54(8):2126–2133. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kang J, Chang JH, Wilson BC, Veilleux I, Bai Y, DaCosta R, Kim K, Ha S, Lee JG, Kim JS, Lee SG, Kim SM, Lee HJ, Ahn YB, Han S, Yoo Y, Song TK. A prototype hand-held tri-model instrument for in vivo ultrasound, photoacoustic, and fluorescence imaging. Rev Sci Instrum. 2015;86:034901. doi: 10.1063/1.4915146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim J, Park S, Jung Y, Chang S, Park J, Zhang Y, Lovell JF, Kim C. Programmable real-time clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35137. doi: 10.1038/srep35137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beard P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus. 2011;2(4):602–631. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang HF, Maslov K, Sivaramakrishnan M, Stoica G, Wang LV. Imaging of hemoglobin oxygen saturation variations in single vessels in vivo using photoacoustic microscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90:053901. doi: 10.1063/1.2435697. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang LV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012;335(6075):1458–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.1216210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taruttis A, Timmermans AC, Wouters PC, Kacprowicz M, van Dam GM, Ntziachristos V. Optoacoustic imaging of human vasculature: feasibility by using a handheld probe. Radiology. 2016;281(1):256–263. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang B, Karpiouk A, Yeager D, Amirian J, Litovsky S, Smalling R, Emelianov S. Intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid in atherosclerotic plaques in the presence of luminal blood. Opt Lett. 2012;37(7):1244–1246. doi: 10.1364/OL.37.001244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.VanderLaan D, Karpiouk AB, Yeager D, Emelianov S. Real-time intravascular ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017;64(1):141–149. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kang J, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Yoo Y, Song TK, Chang JH. Optimal laser wavelength for photoacoustic imaging of breast microcalcifications. Appl Phys Lett. 2011;99:153702. doi: 10.1063/1.3651333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kang J, Kim EK, Kim GR, Yoon C, Song TK, Chang JH. Photoacoustic imaging of breast microcalcifications: a validation study with 3-dimensional ex vivo data and spectrophotometric measurement. J Biophoton. 2015;8:71–80. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201300100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim GR, Kang J, Kwak JY, Chang JH, Kim SI, Youk JH, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK. Photoacoustic imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary study with 8-gauge core-biopsied breast specimens. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chae HD, Lee JY, Jang JY, Chang JH, Kang J, Kang MJ, Han JK. Photoacoustic imaging for differential diagnosis of benign polyps versus malignant polyps of the gallbladder: a preliminary study. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(5):821–827. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De La Zerda A, Zavaleta C, Keren S, Vaithilingam S, Bodapati S, Liu Z, Levi J, Smith BR, Ma TJ, Oralkan O, Cheng Z, Chen XY, Dai HJ, Khuri-Yakub BT, Gambhir SS. Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3:557–562. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mallidi S, Larson T, Tam J, Joshi PP, Karpiouk A, Sokolov K, Emelianov S. Multiwavelength photoacoustic imaging and plasmon resonance coupling of gold nanoparticles for selective detection of cancer. Nano Lett. 2009;9:2825–2831. doi: 10.1021/nl802929u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Song KH, Kim CH, Cobley CM, Xia YN, Wang LV. Near-infrared gold nanocages as a new class of tracers for photoacoustic sentinel lymph node mapping on a rat model. Nano Lett. 2009;9:183–188. doi: 10.1021/nl802746w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen YS, Frey W, Kim S, Kruizinga P, Homan K, Emelianov S. Silica-coated gold nanorods as photoacoustic signal nanoamplifiers. Nano Lett. 2011;11:348–354. doi: 10.1021/nl1042006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilson K, Homan K, Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat Commun. 2012;3:618–627. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moon H, Kumar D, Kim H, Sim C, Chang JH, Kim JM, Kim H, Lim DK. Amplified photoacoustic performance and enhanced photothermal stability of reduced graphene oxide-coated gold nanorods for sensitive photoacoustic imaging. ACS Nano. 2015;9(3):2711–2719. doi: 10.1021/nn506516p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sim C, Kim H, Moon H, Lee H, Chang JH, Kim H. Photoacoustic-based nanomedicine for cancer diagnosis and therapy. J Control Release. 2015;203:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moon H, Kang J, Sim C, Kim J, Lee H, Chang JH, Kim H. Multifunctional theranostic contrast agent for photoacoustics- and ultrasound-based tumor diagnosis and ultrasound-stimulated local tumor therapy. J Control Release. 2015;218:63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ju KY, Kang J, Pyo J, Lim J, Chang JH, Lee JK. pH-induced aggregated melanin nanoparticles for photoacoustic signal amplification. Nanoscale. 2016;8:14448–14456. doi: 10.1039/C6NR02294D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alitalo K, Carmeliet P. Molecular mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in health and disease. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:219–227. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00051-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gould EA, Winship T, Philbin PH, Hyland Kerr H. Observations on a “sentinel node” in cancer of the parotid. Cancer. 1960;13:77–78. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196001/02)13:1<77::AID-CNCR2820130114>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sleeman JP, Thiele W. Tumor metastasis and the lymphatic vasculature. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:2747–2756. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pesce C, Morrow M. The need for lymph node dissection in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:119–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-052511-135500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, Hunt KK, Giuliano AE. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3657–3663. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wetzig N, Gill PG, Espinoza D. Sentinel-lymph-node-based management or routine axillary clearance? Five-year outcomes of the RACS Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Axillary Clearance (SNAC) 1 Trial: assessment and incidence of true lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1064–1070. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5669-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jimenez RE, Panageas K, Busan KJ, Brady MS. Prognostic implications of multiple lymphatic basin drainage in patients with truncal melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:518–524. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pereira CT, Marques FL, Williams J, Martin BW, Bombonato PP. 99MTC-labeled dextran for mammary lymphoscintigraphy in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008;49(5):487–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Harivardhan Reddy L, Sharma RK, Chuttani K, Mishra AK, Murthy RS. Influence of administration route on tumor uptake and biodistribution of etoposide loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in Dalton’s lymphoma tumor bearing mice. J Control Release. 2005;105:185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bergqvist L, Strand SE, Persson B, Hafström L, Jönsson PE. Dosimetryin lymphoscintigraphy of Tc-99m antimony sulfide colloid. J Nucl Med. 1982;23:698–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ho AM, Avery R, Krupinski EA, Warneke J, Kuo PH. Predictive pole of imaging in sentinel lymph node dissection for melanoma. Lymphology. 2014;47:134–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Harvey NL, Srinivasan RS, Dillard ME, Johnson NC, Witte MH, Boyd K, Sleeman MW, Oliver G. Lymphatic vascular defects promoted by Prox1 haploinsufficiency cause adult-onset obesity. Nat Genet. 2015;37:1072–1081. doi: 10.1038/ng1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kajiya K, Hirakawa S, Detmar M. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A mediates ultraviolet B-induced impairment of lymphatic vessel function. Am J Pathol. 2006;169(4):1496–1503. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang F, Niu G, Lu G, Chen X. Preclinical lymphatic imaging. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(4):599–612. doi: 10.1007/s11307-010-0421-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nune SK, Gunda P, Majeti BK, Thallapally PK, Forrest ML. Advances in lymphatic imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;64:876–886. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Khaifi A, Schneebaum S, Fliss DM, Lerman H, Metser U, Ben-Yosef R, Gil Z, Reider-Trejo L, Genadi L, Sapir EE. Lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node mapping using a hybrid single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT system in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2006;28:874–879. doi: 10.1002/hed.20434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lohrmann C, Foeldi E, Bartholoma J-P, Langer M. Interstitial MR lymphangiography—a diagnostic imaging method for the evaluation of patients with clinically advanced stages of lymphedema. Acta Trop. 2007;104:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wua H, Xu X, Ying H, Hoffman MR, Shen N, Sha Y, Zhou L. Preliminary study of indirect CT lymphography-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in a tongue VX2 carcinoma model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:1268–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Suga K, Ogasawara N, Okada M, Matsunaga N. Interstitial CT lymphography-guided localization of breast sentinel lymph node: preliminary results. Surgery. 2003;133:170–179. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aviv H, Bartling S, Kieslling F, Margel S. Radiopaque iodinated copolymeric nanoparticles for X-ray imaging applications. Biomaterials. 2009;30(29):5610–5616. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rabin O, Perez JM, Grimm J, Wojtkiewicz G, Weissleder R. An X-ray computed tomography imaging agent based on long-circulating bismuth sulphide nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2006;5:118–122. doi: 10.1038/nmat1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tins B. Technical aspects of CT imaging of the spine. Insights Imaging. 2010;1:349–359. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0047-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mahmoudi M, Simchi A, Imani M, Milani AS, Stroeve P. Optimal design and characterization of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with polyvinyl alcohol for targeted delivery and imaging. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:14470–14481. doi: 10.1021/jp803016n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R. A critical review of the in vitro cytotoxicity data currently available for three classes of nanoparticles including QDs. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small. 2008;4:26–49. doi: 10.1002/smll.200700595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Na HB, Song IC, Hyeon T. Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents. Adv Mater. 2009;21:2133–2148. doi: 10.1002/adma.200802366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Waters EA, Wickline SA. Contrast agents for MRI. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008;103:114–121. doi: 10.1007/s00395-008-0711-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst H-B, Lundgren S, Fjosne HE, Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Haraldseth O. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1464–1471. doi: 10.1007/s003300000370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Willmann JK, van Bruggen N, Dinkelborg LM, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:591–607. doi: 10.1038/nrd2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tang J, Salloum D, Carney B, Brand C, Kossatz S, Sadique A, Lewis JS, Weber WA, Wendel H-G, Reiner T. Targeted PET imaging strategy to differentiate malignant from inflamed lymph nodes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(36):7441–7449. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705013114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rubaltelli L, Khadivi Y, Tregnaghi A, Stramare R, Ferro F, Borsate S, Fiocco U, Adami F, Rossi CR. Evaluation of lymph node perfusion using continuous mode harmonic ultrasonography with a second-generation contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(6):829–836. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.6.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sorace AG, Saini R, Mahoney M, Hoyt K. Molecular ultrasound imaging using a targeted contrast agent for assessing early tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy. Am Inst Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(10):1543–1550. doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.10.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology. 2000;215:694–697. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn37694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Scoggins CR, Chagpar AB, Martin RC, McMasters KM. Should sentinel lymph-node biopsy be used routinely for staging melanoma and breast cancers? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2:448–455. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ahrendt GM, Laud P, Tjoe J, Eastwood D, Walker AP, Otterson MF, Redlich PN. Does breast tumor location influence success of sentinel lymph node biopsy? J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:278–284. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01174-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Benson J. Indocyanine green fluorescence for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:6–8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4801-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Osmonob DK, Heimann D, Janßen I, Aksenov A, Kalz A, Juenemann KP. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT regarding the detection of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer recurrence. Springerplus. 2014;3:340–347. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Harnan SE, Cooper KL, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerld P, Papaioannou D, Ingram C, Lorenz E, Wilkinson ID, Wyld L. Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:928–936. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bakhtiar N, Jaleel F, Moosa FA, Qureshi NA, Jawaid M. Sentinel lymph node identification by blue dye in patients with breast carcinoma. Pak J Med. 2016;32:448–451. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Matsuzawa F, Omoto K, Einama T, Abe H, Suzuki T, Hamaguchi J, Kaga T, Sato M, Oomira M, Takata Y, Fujibe A, Takeda C, Tamura E, Taketomi A, Kyuno K. Accurate evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node metastasis using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with Sonazoid in breast cancer: a preliminary clinical trial. Springerplus. 2015;4:509. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1291-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Sileri P, Lauberg S, Wexner SD. Sensitivity and specificity of indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence imaging in detection of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(6):730–740. doi: 10.1002/jso.24701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stoffels I, Dissemond J, Poeppel T, Klotgen K, Hillen U, Korber A, Schadendorf D, Klode J. Advantages of preoperative ultrasound in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy in detecting malignant melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective analysis in 221 patients with malignant melanoma AJCC stages I and II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(1):79–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schijven MP, Vingerhoets AJ, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rounmen RM, Bussel ME. Comparison of morbidity between axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:341–350. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen SL, Iddings DM, Scheri RP, Bilckik AJ. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node analysis: current concepts and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:292–309. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.5.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wong SL, Abell TD, Chao C, Edwards MH, McMasters KM. Optimal use of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast carcinoma. Am Cancer Soc. 2002;95:478–487. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Okada RC, Wascher RA, Elashoff D, Giuliano AE. Long-term morbidity of sentinel node biopsy versus complete axillary dissection for unilateral breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):1996–2005. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9909-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Tuttle TM. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(8):745–753. doi: 10.1007/BF02574496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, Bobrow L, Millar K, Myles JP, Duffy SW. Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4312–4321. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Rautiainen S, Masarwah A, Sudah M, Sutela A, Pelkonen O, Joukainen S, Sironen R, Kärjä V, Vanninen R. Axillary lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer: comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2013;269:54–60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Song KH, Stein EW, Margenthaler JA, Wang LV. Noninvasive photoacoustic identification of sentinel lymph nodes containing methylene blue in vivo in a rat model. J Biomed Opt. 2008;13(5):054033. doi: 10.1117/1.2976427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim C, Song KH, Gao F, Wang LV. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels: noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats—volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging. Radiology. 2010;255(2):442–450. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Landsman ML, Kwant G, Mook GA, Zijlstra WG. Light-absorbing properties, stability, and spectral stabilization of indo- cyanine green. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40(4):575–583. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1976.40.4.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pan D, Pramanik M, Senpan A, Ghosh S, Wickline SA, Wang LV, Lanza GM. Near infrared photoacoustic detection of sentinel lymph nodes with gold nanobeacons. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4088–4093. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Song KH, Kim C, Maslov K, Wang LV. Noninvasive in vivo spectroscopic nanorod-contrast photoacoustic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70:227–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pramanik M, Song KH, Swierczewska M, Green D, Sitharaman B, Wang LV. In vivo carbon nanotube-enhanced non-invasive photoacoustic mapping of the sentinel lymph node. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(11):3291–3301. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lee C, Kim J, Zhang Y, Jeon M, Liu C, Song L, Lovell JF, Kim C. Dual-color photoacoustic lymph node imaging using nanoformulated naphthalocyanines. Biomaterials. 2015;73:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Luke GP, Bashyam A, Homan KA, Makhija S, Chen YS, Emelianov SY. Silica-coated gold nanoplates as stable photoacoustic contrast agents for sentinel lymph node imaging. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:455101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/45/455101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Koo J, Jeon M, Oh Y, Kang HW, Kim J, Kim C, Oh J. In vivo non-ionizing photoacoustic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes and bladders with ICG-enhanced carbon nanotubes. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:7853–7862. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.McCormack D, AI-Shaer M, Goldschmidt BS, Dale PS, Henry C, Papageorgio C, Bhattacharyya K, Viator JA. Photoacoustic detection of melanoma micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131:07519. doi: 10.1115/1.3169247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Luke GP, Emelianov SY. Label-free detection of lymph node metastases with US-guided functional photoacoustic imaging. Radiology. 2015;277(2):435–442. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Erpelding TN, Kim C, Pramanik M, Jankovic L, Maslov K, Guo Z, Margenthaler JA, Pashley MD, Wang LV. Sentinal lymph nodes in the rat: noninvasive photoacoustic and US imaging with a clinical US system. Radiology. 2010;256:102–110. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Luke GP, Myers JN, Emelianov SY, Sokolov KV. Sentinel lymph node biopsy revisited: ultrasound-guided photoacoustic detection of micrometastases using molecularly target plasmonic nanosensors. Cancer Res. 2014;74(19):5397–5408. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jeon M, Kim C. Multimodal photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans Multimed. 2013;15(5):975–982. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2013.2244203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Garcia-Uribe A, Erpelding TN, Krumholz A, Ke H, Maslov K, Appleton C, Margenthaler JA, Wang LV. Dual-modality photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for noninvasive sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15748. doi: 10.1038/srep15748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sivasubramanian K, Periyasamy V, Pramanik M. Non-invasive sentinel lymph node mapping and needle guidance using clinical handheld photoacoustic imaging system in small animal. J Biophotonics. 2018;11:201700061. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yang L, Cheng J, Chen Y, Yu S, Liu F, Sun Y, Chen Y, Ran H. Phase-transition nanodroplets for real-time photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modality imaging and photothermal therapy of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45213. doi: 10.1038/srep45213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kim H, Kang J, Chang JH. Thermal therapeutic method for selective treatment of deep-lying tissue by combining laser and high-intensity focused ultrasound energy. Opt Lett. 2014;39(9):2806–2809. doi: 10.1364/OL.39.002806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Akers WJ, Edwards WB, Kim C, Xu B, Erpelding TN, Wang LV, Achilefu S. Multimodal sentinel lymph node mapping with SPECT/CT and photoacoustic tomography. Transl Res. 2012;159:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Liu Q, Zhou M, Li P, Ku G, Huang G, Li C, Song S. 64CuS-labeled nanoparticles: a new sentinel-lymph-node-mapping agent for PET-CT and photoacoustic tomography. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016;11:475–481. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang B, Zhao Q, Barkey NM, Morse DL, Jiang H. Photoacoustic tomography and fluorescence molecular tomography: a comparative study based on indocyanine green. Med Phys. 2012;39(5):2512–2517. doi: 10.1118/1.3700401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chen J, Liu C, Zeng G, You Y, Wang H, Gong X, Zheng R, Kim J, Kim C, Song L. Indocyanine green loaded reduced graphene oxide for in vivo photoacoustic/fluorescence dual-modality tumor imaging. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2016;11:85. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1288-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Peng D, Du Y, Shi Y, Mao D, Jia X, Li H, Zhu Y, Wang K, Tian J. Precise diagnosis in different scenarios using photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging with dual-modality nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2016;8:14480. doi: 10.1039/C6NR03809C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Liu Z, Rong P, Yu L, Zhang X, Yang C, Guo F, Zhao Y, Zhou K, Wang W, Zeng W. Dual-modality noninvasive mapping of sentinel lymph node by photoacoustic and near-infrared fluoscent imaging using dye-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2015;12:3119–3128. doi: 10.1021/mp500698b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Akers WJ, Kim C, Berezin M, Guo K, Fuhrhop R, Lanza GM, Fischer GM, Daltrozzo E, Zumbusch A, Cai X, Wang LV, Achilefu S. Noninvasive photoacoustic and fluorescence sentinel lymph node identification using dye-loaded perfluorocarbon nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2011;5:173–182. doi: 10.1021/nn102274q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kang J, Chang JH, Kim SM, Lee HJ, Kim H, Brian C, Wilson BC, Song T-K. Real-time sentinel lymph node biopsy guidance using combined ultrasound, photoacoustic, fluorescence imaging: in vivo proof-of-principle and validation with nodal obstruction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45008. doi: 10.1038/srep45008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lovell JF, Jin CS, Huynh E, Jin H, Kim C, Rubinstein JL, Chan WCW, Cao W, Wang LV, Zheng G. Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. Nat Mater. 2011;10:324–332. doi: 10.1038/nmat2986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kandukuri J, Yu S, Cheng B, Bandi V, D’Souza F, Nguyen KT, Hong Y, Yuan B. A dual-modality system for both multi-color ultrasound-switchable fluorescence and ultrasound imaging. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2):323. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Moon H, Kang J, Lee H, Lee M, Chang JH, Lee HJ, Kim H. Theragnostic nanodroplets for photoacoustic and ultrasound signal amplification and optically triggered vaporization-induced drug release. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2017;17(11):7978–7985. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2017.15071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, MacNee W, Donaldson K. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3:423–428. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Browning LM, Lee KJ, Huang T, Nallathamby PD, Lowman JE, Xu XHN. Random walk of single gold nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos leading to stochastic toxic effects on embryonic developments. Nanoscale. 2009;1:138–152. doi: 10.1039/b9nr00053d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yu J, Schuman JS, Lee JK, Lee SG, Chang JH, Kim K. A light illumination enhancement device for photoacoustic imaging: in vivo animal study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017;64(8):1205–1211. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2713599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kim H, Chang JH. Increased light penetration due to ultrasound-induced air bubbles in optical scattering media. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16444-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biomedical Engineering Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES