Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 6;4(3):66. doi: 10.3390/gels4030066

Table 1.

Properties of spherical PUA aerogel beads in comparison to PUA monoliths prepared from Desmodur N3300 according to Equation (2).

PUA Sample Bulk Density ρb (g cm–3) Skeletal Density ρs (g cm–3) Porosity a II (% v/v) BET Surf. Area b σ (m2 g–1) VTotalc (V1.7–300nm) d (cm3 g−1) av. pore diam. e (4VTotal/σ) (nm) Particle Size f r (nm)
PUA-A beads 0.166 ± 0.001 1.246 ± 0.005 87 197 5.2 (1.2) 24 (105) 12
PUA-B monolith-propylene carbonate 0.110 ± 0.001 1.236 ± 0.006 91 73 8.3 (0.2) 13 (455) 33
PUA-B monolith-acetone g 0.126 ± 0.001 1.265 ± 0.006 90 169 7.1 (1.1) 42 (169) 14

a Calculated according to the formula: (ρsρb)/ρs, where ρs: skeletal density and ρb: bulk density. b Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area. c Volume calculated according to formula: 1/ρb – 1/ρs. d Cumulative volume of pores between 1.7 and 300 nm from N2-sorption data and the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) desorption method. e Calculated by the 4V/σ method; V was set equal to the maximum volume of N2 adsorbed along the isotherm as P/Po → 1.0. f Calculated by the formula: r = 3/(ρs × σ). g Values obtained from reference [26].