Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206372

Vitamin D status of tuberculosis patients with diabetes mellitus in different economic areas and associated factors in China

Xin Zhao 1, Yanli Yuan 2, Yan Lin 3,4,*, Tiejuan Zhang 2, Yunlong Bai 2, Demei Kang 5, Xianhui Li 6, Wanli Kang 7,8, Riitta A Dlodlo 3, Anthony D Harries 3,9
Editor: Naeti Suksomboon10
PMCID: PMC6211694  PMID: 30383776

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D could be a mediator in the association between tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM). A large scale multi-center study confirmed that TB patients with DM had significantly lower serum vitamin D level compared with those without DM and reported that DM was a strong independent risk factor for vitamin D deficiency.

Objectives

This study was undertaken to determine amongst patients with both TB and DM living in different economically defined areas in China: i) their baseline characteristics, ii) their vitamin D status and iii) whether certain baseline characteristics were associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Methods

In DM-TB patients consecutively attending seven clinics or hospitals, we measured 25 hydroxycholecalciferol at the time of registration using electrochemiluminescence in a COBASE 601 Roche analyser by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Data analysis was performed using chi square test and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

There were 178 DM-TB patients that included 50 from economically well-developed areas, 103 from better-off areas and 25 from a poverty area. Median vitamin D levels in well-developed, better-off and poverty areas were 11.5ng/ml, 12.2ng/ml and 11.5ng/ml respectively. Amongst all patients, 149 (84%) had vitamin D deficiency—91 (51%) with vitamin D deficiency (10–19.9 ng/ml) and 58 (33%) with severe deficiency (< 10 ng/ml). There was a significantly higher proportion with vitamin D deficiency in the poverty area. The adjusted odds of vitamin D deficiency (25-(OH)D3 <20 ng/ml) were significantly higher in those with longer history of DM (P = 0.038) and with HbA1c≥10% (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

Over 80% of TB patients with DM in China were vitamin D deficient, with risk factors being residence in a poverty area, a long duration of DM and uncontrolled DM. TB programme managers and clinicians need to pay more attention to the vitamin D status of their patients.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic condition that occurs when the body cannot produce or effectively utilize insulin, which results in increased levels of glucose in the blood stream (hyperglycaemia) causing metabolic disorders of many organs over time [1]. During the past few decades, socio-economic development, urbanization and life style changes have led to most countries undergoing a significant epidemiological transition, and this has resulted in a rapidly increasing burden of DM. In 2015, there were an estimated 415 million people living with DM globally, with numbers set to rise to nearly 650 million by 2040 [1]. DM is associated with several co-morbidities, one of which is a three times higher risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) compared with the general population [2,3]. In 2012, the population attributable fraction of DM for adult TB cases globally was estimated at 15% with the number of adult TB cases associated with DM being 1,042,000 [4].

Vitamin D is a secosteroid which is both synthesized in the skin by the action of sunlight and ingested in the diet. The vitamin is metabolized first in the liver to 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25-(OH)D3] and then in the kidney to 1,25- dihydroxycholecalciferol [1,25-(OH)2D3], an immunologically active hormone [5]. In the context of DM and TB, vitamin D may have an important role. Experimental research has found that vitamin D and its metabolites regulate the function of pancreatic ß-cells and influence insulin secretion [6]. Vitamin D also plays a key role in human innate and adaptive immunity [5], and assists mononuclear phagocytes to suppress the intracellular growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) after initial infection [7,8]. Recent research has found that persons with type 2 DM with low serum vitamin D levels have impaired monocyte function and therefore reduced capacity to restrict the intracellular growth of MTB, and this may be one of the factors linking DM to an increased risk of TB [9].

For several decades, there has been evidence to show that people with vitamin D deficiency have a significantly higher risk of developing active TB compared with those who have normal vitamin D levels [7,8,10]. In turn, TB patients in general have also been reported to have a higher likelihood of vitamin D deficiency compared with normal controls [11,12]. A small scale study in urban China, using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, reported significant differences in vitamin D levels between patients with TB, patients with TB and pre-DM and patients with TB and DM [13]. A larger scale multi-center study in both urban and rural China, using the electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) method, confirmed these findings and reported that DM was a strong independent risk factor for vitamin D deficiency [14]. However, there have been no large scale studies looking at associations between vitamin D levels and DM related risk factors in TB patients who have DM in routine programmatic settings. Such information would be useful to determine who particularly might be at risk of developing vitamin D deficiency so that this can be prevented or better identified in the future.

We therefore conducted a study in patients with both DM and TB and aimed to determine in relation to their economically-defined residence: i) their baseline characteristics, ii) their vitamin D status and iii) whether certain baseline characteristics were associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Material and methods

Design and settings

This was a multi-centre cross-sectional study carried out in seven TB clinics and hospitals within the routine health services in Jilin Province and Beijing, China.

Seven TB clinics and hospitals in both urban and rural areas were selected for this study. The selection of the clinics and hospitals was based on the broadly defined economic development levels of the catchment areas, a sufficient proportion of TB patients with DM, the availability of essential laboratory facilities and the willingness of the staff to participate in the study without requirements of additional funding support. We selected Beijing to represent an economically well-developed area; Liaoyuan City and Tonghua City as economically better-off urban areas; Dongfeng County, Meihekou County and Tonghua County as economically better-off rural areas; and Daan County as a poverty stricken area.

Diagnosis of TB

All TB patients were diagnosed, registered, and managed according to the guidelines of the China National TB Control Program; which is in accordance with those recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [15,16].

Diagnosis of DM

The diagnosis of DM was made in accordance with the WHO guidelines [17]. Patients were diagnosed with DM either as a result of already being diagnosed by a registered medical institution and documented in the clinic records, or as a result of a fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L being identified at the time of TB registration or at the time of TB diagnosis from another health facility regardless if they were on treatment for hyperglycaemia.

Patient recruitment

TB patients with DM who were included in this study were those either presenting to TB services by themselves with symptoms suggestive of TB or having been referred from other facilities in the same or nearby catchment area. The patients included were ≥18 years and newly registered with any type and category of TB but also with DM according to national and international guidelines. In order to have accurate data on serum vitamin D levels, we excluded the following persons from the study: a) being positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), b) pregnant or lactating women, c) having Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥3 times the upper limit of normal level as hepatic dysfunction may alter vitamin D metabolism, d) receiving vitamin D or Vitamin D analogues for any reason, e) receiving corticosteroid treatment for any reason, and f) receiving anti-cancer therapy as many drugs disturb hepatic function which alter vitamin D metabolism.

Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycocylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement

Venous blood samples were collected for FBG after a minimum of 10 hours overnight fast before anti-TB treatment commenced. FBG measurements were done in accordance with national guidelines which stipulate that a FBG is carried out using a venous plasma and biochemical analyzer with cut-off thresholds based on those recommended by the WHO [17]. Venous blood samples were collected for HbA1c as above, and HbA1c was analysed using the cation exchange method with a high performance liquid chromatography performed by G8-TOSOH, Japan [18].

Blood sample collection and vitamin D measurement

Five ml venous blood sample was taken immediately after their TB registration and before anti-TB treatment was started. All blood samples were taken following an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The samples were centrifuged within 2 hours to separate the serum and stored at -70C until vitamin D analysis was undertaken.

25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25-(OH)D3], was measured in the Beijing Hospital laboratory with the electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) method that determines serum 25-(OH)D3 levels in a COBASE 601 Roche analyser using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Reagents were supplied by Roche (Switzerland) with a normal measurement range of 3–70 ng/ml. Vitamin D levels were classified according to the standard definitions of vitamin D status: 25-(OH)D3 ≥ 30 ng/ml = normal; 25-(OH)D3 between 20–29.9 ng/ml = insufficient vitamin D; 25-(OH)D3 between 10–19.9 ng/ml = vitamin D deficiency; 25-(OH)D3 between 0–9.9 ng/ml = severe vitamin D deficiency.8

Data collection and analysis

Individual patient data on demographic characteristics, TB symptoms, TB treatment history, complications, cigarette smoking status and DM related characteristics were collected. The data were entered to a MS Office Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) datasheet without patient names and other personal identifiers by the principal investigator and analysed using SPSS software for Windows, version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Shapiro-Wilk Test was used to examine normality distribution of vitamin D values. Nonparametric tests were used to compare median levels of vitamin D [25-(OH)D3] between groups. Categorical comparisons of various 25-(OH)D3 levels between DM-TB patients living in different economic areas were carried out using the chi square test. All P values are 2-tailed. Relationships between 25-(OH)D3 and baseline exposure variables were evaluated with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression. Levels of significance were set at 5%. Variables with unadjusted ORs for which the P value was <0.05 were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Ethics approval

The research proposal was approved by the health authorities in the implementing sites. The Ethics Advisory Group, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France, formally approved this study (EAG number: 102/15). Patients recruited to this study were informed and agreed to participate. The Union model of Informed Consent Forms was used and signed by the patients.

Results

There were 178 TB patients with DM consecutively registered in this study. They were 129 males (72%) and 49 females (28%). Of these, 50 were from the economically well-developed area, 103 from the economically better-off urban and rural areas and 25 from the poverty area. The mean age was 56 years (Range 25–89). Patients comprised 73 with smear-positive pulmonary TB, 92 with smear-negative pulmonary TB and 13 with extra pulmonary TB (EPTB).

Baseline characteristics in relation to the type of economical area that the patients resided in are shown in Table 1. Between the different economically affected areas, there were no significant differences in patient characteristics with regards to age, gender, category of TB (new and previously treated), DM history and level of HbA1c. However, there were some significant differences in relation to urban / rural residency and type of TB. To further understand the significant differences among the three economic areas, we performed a post-test and the results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. There were higher proportions of patients with urban residence and confirmed smear-positive pulmonary TB in the well-developed areas compared with better-off areas and the poverty area. However, there were no significant differences between patients from better-off areas and the poverty area.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patient s with tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in China.

Characteristics Number (%) of the patients residing in different economic areas χ2 P value
Well developed (N = 50) Better-off (N = 103) Poverty (N = 25)
Gender Male 40(31.0) 73(56.6) 16(12.4) 2.452 0.294
Female 10(20.4) 30(61.2) 9(18.4)
Age <50 17(29.3) 33(56.9) 8(13.8) 0.063 0.969
≥50 33(27.5) 70(58.3) 17(14.2)
Residence Urban 35(39.3) 44(49.4) 10(11.3) 11.184 0.004
Rural 15(16.9) 59(66.2) 15(16.9)
Type/Sputum smear Positive 36(49.3) 25(34.2) 12(16.5) 39.140 <0.001
Negative 9(9.8) 70(76.1) 13(14.1)
EPTB 5(38.5) 8(61.5) 0
Category of TB New 34(26.8) 74(58.2) 19(15.0) 0.551 0.759
Retreatment 16(31.4) 29(56.9) 6(11.7)
Smoking No 23(28.0) 47(57.3) 12(14.7) 0.046 0.977
Yes 27(28.1) 56(58.3) 13(13.6)
History of DM < 10 years 19(26.8) 38(53.5) 14(19.7) 7.463 0.113
≥10 years 18(37.5) 24(50.0) 6(12.5)
undiagnosed 13(22.0) 41(69.5) 5(8.5)
HbA1c <7.0% 10(29.4) 21(61.8) 3(8.8) 1.100 0.902
7.0–9.9% 18(26.5) 40(58.8) 10(14.7)
≥10% 22(28.9) 42(55.3) 12(15.8)

TB = tuberculosis; DM = diabetes mellitus

Table 2. A post-test: Comparison of the number of patients living in different communities in relation to different economic areas.

Comparison group χ2 P value
Well-developed VS better-off area 10.032 0.002
Well-developed VS poverty area 6.250 0.012
Better-off area VS poverty area 0.061 0.805

Table 3. A post-test: Comparison of the number of patients with different types/smear results in relation to different economic areas.

Comparison group χ2 P value
Well-developed VS better-off area 36.885 <0.001
Well-developed VS poverty area 9.728 0.006
Better-off area VS poverty area 5.860 0.044

Amongst all the patients, 149 (84%) had vitamin D deficiency—91 (51%) with vitamin D deficiency (10–19.9 ng/ml) and 58 (33%) with severe deficiency (< 10 ng/ml). Serum Vitamin D [25-(OH)D3] levels and proportions of patients with various grades of vitamin D deficiency in relation to where they lived in terms of economically developed / poor areas are shown in Table 4. The median level (and IQR) of serum vitamin D among the 3 different economic areas was similar, but there were significantly higher proportions of patients with vitamin D deficiency or severe deficiency in the poverty area. Of the TB patients, there were 59 who were newly diagnosed with DM at the time of TB registration and their characteristics and vitamin D status are shown in Table 5. They were predominantly male, aged 50 years and above and more resided in rural areas, and there was a high degree of deficiency or severe deficiency of vitamin D.

Table 4. Vitamin D status in TB patients with DM, stratified by their residence in different economic areas in China.

Vitamin D status Patients in well- developed area
N = 50
Patients in better-off area
N = 103
Patients in poverty area
N = 25
P value
Median level (ng/ml) (IQR) 11.5 (7.08, 15.65) 12.2 (8.80, 17.80) 11.5 (9.95, 14.55) 0.387
No (%) with normal level
(≥30ng/ml)
2 (4.0) 3 (2.9) 0 (0) 0.655
No (%) with insufficiency
(20–29.9ng/ml)
6 (12.0) 17 (16.5) 1 (4.0) <0.001
No (%) with deficiency
(10–19.9ng/ml)
22 (44.0) 51 (49.5) 18 (72.0) <0.001
No (%) with severe deficiency
(<10ng/ml)
20 (40.0) 32 (31.1) 6 (24.0) <0.001

Vitamin D status determined by measurements of 25-(OH)D3. DM = Diabetes mellitus; TB = Tuberculosis; IQR = interquartile range

Table 5. Characteristics of TB patients newly diagnosed with DM at the time of TB registration in China.

Characteristics/Categories Number (%) of distributions
Gender Male 40 (67.8)
Female 19 (32.2)
Residence Urban 24 (40.7)
Rural 35 (59.3)
Age <50 years 16 (27.1)
≥50 years 43 (72.9)
Smoking Yes 30 (50.9)
No 29 (49.1)
Serum vitamin D level Normal ≥30ng/ml 3 (5.1)
Insufficiency 20–29.9ng/ml 5 (8.5)
Deficiency 10–19.9ng/ml 30 (50.8)
Severe deficiency <10ng/ml 21 (35.6)

Baseline characteristics of TB patients with DM in relation to being vitamin D deficient (25-(OH)D3 <20ng/ml) are shown in Table 6. The adjusted odds of a TB patient with DM having vitamin D deficiency were significantly higher in those with a longer history of DM and in those with uncontrolled DM whose HbA1c ≥10%. Other baseline characteristics such as type and category of TB, seasons of TB notification, DM treatment, FBG levels and smoking status were not associated with vitamin D status.

Table 6. Baseline characteristics in TB patients with DM in relation to vitamin D deficiency (<20ng/ml).

Characteristics Total (N = 178) No. (%) with vitamin D deficiency (N = 149) Univariate OR (95% CI) Multivariate OR (95% CI) P value
Gender Male 129 108 (83.7) Reference
Female 49 41 (83.7) 1.00 (0.41–2.43)
Age <50 years 58 48 (82.8) Reference
≥50 years 120 101 (84.2) 1.11 (0.48–2.56)
Residence Urban 89 76 (85.4) Reference
Rural 89 73 (82.0) 0.78 (0.35–1.74)
Type/sputum smear Negative 92 77 (83.7) Reference
Positive 73 61 (83.6) 0.99 (0.43–2.27)
EPTB 13 11 (84.6) 1.07 (0.22–5.33)
Category of TB New 127 107 (84.3) Reference
Retreatment 51 42 (82.4) 0.87 (0.37–2.07)
Smoking No 82 69 (84.1) Reference
Yes 96 80 (83.3) 0.94 (0.42–2.10)
Months of TB registration May-Oct. 41 33 (80.5) Reference
Nov.-Apr. 137 116 (84.7) 1.34 (0.54–3.30)
DM history <10 years 71 54 (76.1) Reference
≥10 years 48 44 (91.7) 3.46 (1.09–11.04) 3.57 (1.07–11.83) 0.038
Undiagnosed 59 51 (86.4) 2.01 (0.80–5.05) 2.57 (0.96–6.90) 0.062
DM treatment Yes 117 97 (82.9) Reference
No 61 52 (85.2) 1.19 (0.51–2.80)
FBG control ≤7.0 mmol/L 9 7 (77.8) Reference
7.1–9.9 mmol/L 79 62 (78.5) 1.04 (0.20–5.48)
10.0–11.9 mmol/L 33 29 (87.9) 2.07 (0.31–13.68)
≥12 mmol/L 57 51 (89.5) 2.43 (0.41–14.47)
HbA1c level <7.0% 34 25 (73.5) Reference
7.0–9.9% 68 52 (76.5) 1.17 (0.45–3.01) 1.23 (0.45–3.36) 0.683
≥10.0% 76 72 (94.5) 6.48 (1.83–22.91) 7.31 (1.97–27.18) 0.003

TB = tuberculosis; EPTB = extra-pulmonary tuberculosis; DM = Diabetes mellitus; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval

Discussion

This study aimed to obtain a better understanding of vitamin D status amongst TB patients with DM in the routine programme setting in China based on their residence according to economic development and baseline characteristics. There were some interesting findings.

First, there was a low median level of vitamin D in patients with dual disease, which was lower than levels found previously in non-DM patients with TB and in the general population [14,19]. This finding is also in line with previous research findings [10,12,13]. Both DM and TB are diseases that impact on nutritional intake and both may contribute to a lower serum vitamin D level [5,6]. A recent meta-analysis also confirmed a significantly lower serum vitamin D level in TB patients versus normal controls, but pointed out a weak association of this trend for Asian populations [12]. However, this was not observed in our study, and possible reasons include the poor population and accumulated risk of TB and DM [20]. A study in India found that no major differences in mean vitamin D levels between TB patients with DM and without DM, but the proportion of those with severe vitamin D deficiency was higher in patients with both TB and DM [21].

Second, about one third of all the patients regardless of their residential areas had severe vitamin D deficiency (<10ng/ml), and this in its own right requires urgent attention. Previous research has indicated that rifampicin causes an accelerated loss of vitamin D due to increased body clearance and limited formation of the active form of vitamin D [25-(OH)D3 ] [22]. Isoniazid can also cause impairment of 25-hydroxylation leading to impaired immunological function [23]. Serum vitamin D levels might also be further depressed due to enhanced negative impacts when the drugs are used in combination. Naik et al observed that the mean vitamin D level decreased 16% from the time of TB diagnosis to completion of anti-TB treatment six months later [24]. These findings suggest that there may be a need for vitamin D supplementation in those found with severe vitamin D deficiency at the time of TB registration [25,26]. However, further research is required in this area, as there are conflicting reports about this aspect [11,27,28].

Third, a literature review has shown that there are low serum vitamin D levels among persons living in poor areas compared with developed areas [29], similar to our findings in this study. In the poverty county defined by the China State Council, there was a significantly higher proportion of DM-TB patients with vitamin D deficiency compared with patients in the other economic areas. China is a country with high incidence of TB and high prevalence of latent TB infection [30]. A recent meta-analysis confirmed that vitamin D deficiency is strongly associated with an increased risk of progression from latent TB infection to active TB disease with or without household contacts [12]. This raises the question about whether there is a need for early interventions focused on improving nutritional intake and food fortification with vitamin D supplements and requires discussion amongst policy makers.

Fourth, we did not find associations between vitamin D deficiency and baseline characteristics such as age, gender, residential community and number of daily cigarettes smoked, findings also in line with previous research [14]. Contrary to previous research [14,28], we found no strong association in this study with season, possibly because most of our patients lived in urban areas which may not have been so affected by reduced nutritional intake that occurs in the winter time. In the previous report, 32.5% of the study population resided in urban areas, but the figure was 50.0% in the current study. Another intriguing finding that also requires further research was that patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB were not at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency compared with those who had smear-negative disease. This appears to be counter-intuitive as smear-positive TB tends to be associated with increased disease severity or long-term illness [31], which in turn might be expected to increase the risk of vitamin D deficiency.

Having a history of DM for 10 years or more or a serum glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥10% were independent risk factors for vitamin D deficiency. Reasons may be as follows. Both DM and TB are associated with malnutrition and this association may be stronger with a longer duration of DM and multiple episodes of TB [32]. Amongst our study group, the proportion with older age and retreatment TB at nearly 30% was higher than found in a previous study of TB patients [14], a finding similar to that observed in Guangzhou [33].

HbA1c reflects average blood glucose levels over a period of 2–3 months and may be less affected by infection related hyperglycaemia [34]. HbA1c ≥10% represents poor glycaemic control and is an indicator for administering insulin treatment in DM patients with TB as recommended by the Union and World Diabetes Foundation. A recent systematic review highlighted that HbA1c is a reliable risk factor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in both DM and non-DM populations [35]. In patients with DM, the risk of all-cause mortality increased when HbA1c levels were above 8.0% and were highest when levels were above 9.0% [35]. Our findings and the review suggest that a target value of HbA1c for TB patients with DM should be set at <8.0% and clinicians need to be made aware of this fact. Unexpectedly, not being on DM treatment was not associated with vitamin D deficiency. This finding requires further study, including duration and severity of their diseases.

The strengths of this study were multi-center participation and the large number of TB patients with DM consecutively enrolled from routine programme settings to avoid selection bias. Vitamin D status was assessed according to their different economic development areas. To our knowledge, this is the first report on vitamin D status in DM-TB patients from the routine programme setting stratified by economic areas in China. There were, however, some limitations. First, for those patients newly diagnosed with DM, the diagnosis was based on FBG≥7.0 mmol/L at the time of TB notification without validation by other tests such as the oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c. Previous research has confirmed the feasibility of taking blood samples for FBG at the time of TB diagnosis for the majority of TB patients [36], but the use of FBG alone to diagnose DM may underestimate the prevalence of DM by as much as 50% [37]. Second, we took blood samples for measurement of HbA1c immediately after the diagnosis of TB without systematically performing a physical examination. We may therefore have overlooked some conditions that influence the HbA1c level, such as iron deficiency with or without anaemia [38]. Third, we did not collect data on history of symptoms or signs of TB, a factor which might have impacted on vitamin D levels, nor did we analyse patient’s individual food intake in relation to their vitamin D levels. Fourth, the comparison with some conditions in other published studies may not be a true comparison due to the lack of a control group. In addition, 25-(OH)D3 was measured with the ECLIA method only in a COBASE, and results were not confirmed with mass spectrometry, which is more accurate than the ECLIA method, due to this being unavailable in hospital settings in China.

Conclusions

Our study found that 84% of TB patients with DM had vitamin D deficiency or severe deficiency, with the proportions being higher in patients residing in a designated poverty area compared with other areas. Those with a longer duration of DM and those showing HbA1c level ≥10% were at higher risk of vitamin D deficiency. TB Programme managers and clinicians need to pay more attention to vitamin D status in their patients, especially for those in living in poverty areas.

Supporting information

S1 File. Dataset.

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank all the staff at the seven TB clinics and hospitals for their support in the blood sample collection, storage and managing patients.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas Seventh ed, International Diabetes Federation; 2015. Available at www.idf.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stevenson CR, Critchley JA, Forouhi NG, Roglic G, Williams BG, Dye C, et al. Diabetes and the risk of tuberculosis: a neglected threat to public health. Chronic Illness. 2007; 3: 228–245. 10.1177/1742395307081502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jeon CY & Murray MB. Diabetes mellitus increases the risk of active tuberculosis: a systematic review of 13 observational studies. PLoS Medicine. 2008; 5: e152 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lonnroth K, Roglic G, Harries AD. Diabetes and tuberculosis 1: Improving tuberculosis prevention and care through addressing the global diabetes epidemic: from evidence to policy and practice. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2: 730–739. 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70109-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zittermann A. Vitamin D in preventive medicine: are we ignoring the evidence? Bri J Nutr. 2003; 89: 552–572. 10.1079/BJN2003837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Takiishi T, Gysemans C, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. Vitamion D and diabetes. Rhum Dis Clin North Am. 2012. February; 38: 179–206. 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chesdachai S, Zughaier SM, Hao L, Kempker RR, Blumberg HM, Ziegler TR, et al. The effects of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs on the actions of vitamin D in human macrophages. J of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology. 2016; 6: 23–29. doi: org/10.1016/j.jcte.2016.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. The American J of Clinical Nutr. 2008; 87: 1080 s–1086s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Herrera MT, Gonzalez Y, Hernandez-Sanchez F, Fabian-San Maguel G, Torres M. Low serum vitamin D levels in type 2 diabetes patients are associated with decreased mycobacterial activity. BMC Infectious Dis. 2017; 17: 610 10.1186/s12879-017-2705-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zeng J, Wu G, Yang W, Gu X, Liang W, Yao Y, et al. A serum vitamin D level <25nmol/L pose high tuberculosis risk: a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10.1371/journal.pone.0126014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davies PO. Vitamin D and tuberculosis: more effective in prevention than treatment? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015; 19: 876 10.5588/ijtld.15.0506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang SJ, Wang XH, Liu ZD, Cao WL, Han Y, Ma AG, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and the risk of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2017; 11: 91–102. 10.2147/DDDT.S79870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhan Y, Jiang L. Status of vitamin D, antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin and T helper-associated cytokines in patients with diabetes mellitus and pulmonary tuberculosis. Exper and Thera medi. 2015; 9: 11–16. 10.3892/etm.2014.2042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhao X, Yuan YL, Lin Y, Zhang TJ, Ma JU, Kang WL, et al. Vitamin D status in tuberculosis patients with diabetes, prediabetes and normal blood glucose in China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7:e017557 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ministry of Health and China CDC. Guideline of national TB control program Beijing: The Peking Union Medical College Publishing House; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis Guidelines Fourth Edition, Geneva, WHO, 2009.WHO/HTM/TB/2009.420. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation. Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycaemia Geneva, WHO, 2006. At www.who.int/diabetes/publications/diagnosis_diabetes2006/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.TOSOH Corporation. Instruction for use: TOSOH automated glycohemoglobin analyser HLC-723G8 Tokyo, TOSOH Corporation, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei QS, Chen ZQ, Tan X, Su HR, Chen XX, He W, et al. Relation of age, sex and bone mineral density to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in Chinese women and men. Orthp Surg. 2015; 7: 343–349. 10.1111/os.12206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harries AD, Kumar AMV, Satyanarayana S, Lin Y, Zachariah R, Lonnroth K, at al. Addressing diabetes mellitus as part of the strategy for ending TB. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyeg. 2016; 110: 173–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chaudhary S, Thukral A, Tiwari S, Pratyush DD, Singh SK. Vitamin D status of patients with type 2 diabetes and sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Endocriol Matab. 2013; 17: S670–673. 10.4103/2230-8210.123564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bikle DD. What is new in vitamin D: 2006–2007. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2007; 19: 383–388. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32818e9d58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ralph AP, Lucas RM, Norval M. Vitamin D solar ultraviolet radiation in the risk and treatment of tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13: 77–78. 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70275-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naik AL, Rajan MG, Manjrekar PA, Shenoy MT, Shreelata S, Srikantiah RM, et al. Effect of DOTS treatment on vitamin D levels in pulmonary tuberculosis. J of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017; 11: BC 11–22. 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24501.9759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lopez-Lopez N, Gonzalez-Curiel l, Castaneda-Delgado J, Montoya-Rosales A, Gandara-jasso B, Enciso-Moreno JA, et al. Vitamin D supplementation promotes macrophages’ anti-mycobacterial activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with low vitamin D receptor expression. Microbes Infect. 2014; 16: 755–761. 10.1016/j.micinf.2014.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sutaria N, Liu CT, Chen TC. Vitamin D status, receptor gene polymorphisms, and supplementation on tuberculosis: A systematic review of case-control studies and randomized controlled trials. J of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology. 2014; 1: 151–160. doi: org/10.1016/j.jcte.2014.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xia J, Shi L, Zhao L, Xu F. Impact of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome of tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Chinese medical J. 2014; 127: 3127–3134. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sloan DJ, Mwandumba HC, Kamdolozi M, Shani D, Chisale B, Dutton J, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Malawian adults with pulmonary tuberculosis: risk factors and treatment outcomes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015; 19: 904–911. 10.5588/ijtld.15.0071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sarin P, Duffy J, Mughal E, Hedayat E, Manaseki-Holland. Vitamin D and tuberculosis: review and association in three rural provinces of Afghanistan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016; 20: 383–388. 10.5588/ijtld.15.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization. WHO Report 2016. Global Tuberculosis Control 2015 Geneva, WHO, 2016. Available at www.who.int/tb/publication/global_report/en [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Frieden T. Toman’s Tuberculosis. Second ed WHO, Geneva, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ginandjar P, Saraswati LD, Widjanarko B. Profile of glycated-hemoglobin, antioxidant vitamin and cytokine levels in pulmonary tuberculosis patients: A cross sectional study at pulmonary diseases center Semarang City, Indonesia. Biomedical J. 2016; 39: 354–360. 10.1016/j.bj.2016.01.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mi F, Tan S, Li L, Harries AD, Hinderaker SG, Lin Y, et al. Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis: pattern of tuberculosis, two-month smear conversion and treatment outcome in Guangzhou, China. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2013; 18: 1379–1385. 10.1111/tmi.12198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.World Health Organization. Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO, 2011. WHO/NMH/CHP/CPM/11.1. Report available. http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/report-hba1c_2011.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cavero-Redondo I, Peleteiro B, Alvarez-Bueno C, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Glycated haemoglobin A1c as a risk factor of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e015949 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lin Y, Yuan Y, Zhao X, Liu J, Qiu L, He X, et al. The change in blood glucose levels in tuberculosis patients before and during anti-tuberculosis treatment in China. Glob Health Action. 2017; 10:1289737 10.1080/16549716.2017.1289737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mugusi F, Swai AB, Alberti KG, McLarty DG. Increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania. Tubercle. 1990; 71: 271–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.English E, Idris I, Smith G, Dhatariya K, Kilpatrick ES, John NG. The effect of anaemia and abnormalities of erythrocyte indices on HbA1c analysis: a systematic review. Diabetologia. 2015; July 58: 1409–21. 10.1007/s00125-015-3599-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Dataset.

(XLS)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES