Abstract
Rationale:
Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with metastases to the right atrium (RA) and lungs are rare, with a poor prognosis. Furthermore, the treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCCs remain unsatisfactory.
Patient concerns:
A 46-year-old man presented to our hospital for dyspnea on exertion and abdominal pain.
Diagnoses:
HCC and extra-hepatic metastases to the lung and RA.
Interventions:
Multidisciplinary treatment including radiotherapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib. During a follow-up evaluation computed tomography, he experienced a radio-contrast-induced anaphylaxis. After the event, treatment such as RT, TACE, and sorafenib were continued.
Outcomes:
His tumor burden decreased, finally leading to a complete response as per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The patient is still alive, 30 months after the episode. Subsequent blood tests showed increased natural killer (NK) cell activity, which was significantly higher than that seen in other age-matched HCC patients with an identical stage of the tumor, receiving sorafenib. This suggests that the increase in NK cells induced by anaphylaxis influenced the tumor burden.
Lessons:
We report here a rare case of long-term survival of an HCC patient with multiple metastases treated with multidisciplinary modalities, in which high NK cell activity was observed after a radio-contrast-induced anaphylactic reaction during follow-up investigations.
Keywords: anaphylaxis, antitumor activity, hepatocellular carcinoma, natural killer cell, neoplasm metastasis
1. Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death.[1] A number of systems have been proposed to predict the prognosis for HCC. Union Internationale Contre Le Cancer (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis classification,[2] Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score,[3] and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging indicate the prognosis of HCC.[4]
HCC is typically diagnosed late in the course of the disease, and the median survival after diagnosis ranges approximately between 6 and 20 months.[5] Vascular invasion and extrahepatic spread worsen the prognosis.[6] Most current guidelines recommend sorafenib-based diverse treatment for advanced HCC.[7,8] Although a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP), and an Asia-Pacific study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in increasing the period of survival by 2 to 3 months compared with the control group, complete response (CR) was not observed in these studies.[9,10]
Anaphylaxis is an immunoglobulin E (Ig E)-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. It is a critical allergic reaction, which is rapid in onset and can cause death. It is often accompanied by hypotension, gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory symptoms, or skin symptoms.[11]
Mast cells and many of their products are known for their association with various conditions, such as asthma, allergy, and anaphylaxis. Recent studies have indicated that activation of the mast cells might lead to selective chemotaxis of the natural killer (NK) cells by CXCL8- and CXCR1-dependent mechanisms.[12,13] NK cells were originally defined as effector lymphocytes of innate immunity, with constitutive cytolytic functions. Recent studies have revealed that NK cells can also contribute to adaptive immunity.[14] NK cells are cytotoxic and are known to be effective for various types of tumor cells.[15]
Recently, Sun et al reported that NK cell dysfunction occurs in HCC, and NK cell-based anti-HCC treatment strategies alone or in combination with other therapies might be effective.[16]
We report here a rare case of long-term survival of an HCC patient with multiple metastases treated with multidisciplinary modalities, in which high NK cell activity was observed after a radio-contrast-induced anaphylactic reaction during follow-up investigations.
2. Case report
In November 2015, a 46-year-old man presented to our hospital for dyspnea on exertion and abdominal pain, since a week. He had chronic hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis, without any other disease. On admission, his performance score (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) was 1. Initial laboratory investigations showed a total bilirubin level of 1.93 mg/dL, albumin of 3.9 g/dL, and prothrombin time international normalized ratio of 1.13. Shifting dullness or abdominal distension was not observed, and his mental state appeared normal. The cirrhosis was classified as Child-Pugh class A6. Initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen demonstrated a 12.6 × 12.2 × 11.0 cm HCC with daughter nodules in the right hepatic lobe and tumoral thrombosis in the intrahepatic and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium (RA), as well as multiple lung metastases (Fig. 1). Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a heterogeneous oscillating mass from the distal IVC to the RA. The initial alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was 33,989 ng/mL. The tumor conformed to the BCLC stage C, with a CLIP score of 3, American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging systems (AJCC TNM) stage IVB, and modified UICC stage IVB.
Figure 1.

Initial abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 12.6 × 12.2-cm-sized hepatocellular carcinoma with daughter nodules in the right hepatic lobe (A), tumor thrombosis in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (B), and metastasis to the right atrium (C). Chest CT showed multiple well-defined nodules in both lungs, suggesting pulmonary metastasis (D).
Immediately after the diagnosis, he was treated with entecavir 0.5 mg daily, and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (Nexavar, Bayer, Germany, Leverkusen), which was reduced to 400 mg a day because of a grade III hand–foot skin reaction (HFSR) after 1 month. Ten days after the diagnosis, palliative radiation therapy (daily 250 cGy, 14 times, total 3500 cGy) to the hepatic mass, IVC, and RA metastasis was initiated. Three weeks later, on December 8, 2015, the first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed with Lipiodol 6 cc/Adriamycin 20 mg. After 6 weeks of treatment, on December 31, 2015, a follow-up CT was conducted to check the tumor response. The contrast medium used was iomeprol (iomeron; Bracco Imaging Korea, Ltd., Korea, Seoul), and it was the first time he had received the agent. He had no history of adverse effects from other contrast agents used previously. However, the patient complained of dyspnea and developed loss of consciousness, immediately after injection of the contrast medium iomeprol. The systolic blood pressure was 50 mm Hg, whereas the diastolic BP could not be detected. After injecting 1 mg of epinephrine, 4 mg of peniramine, 5 mg of dexamethasone, and loading 2 LL of normal saline, he gradually recovered from the anaphylactic shock. ImmunoCAP tryptase measured 1 hour after the event was increased to 19.8 μg/L (normal range: 0–11.5 μg/L). Follow-up CT revealed that the tumor mass was reduced to 9.1 × 7.5 × 7.3 cm (from 12.6 × 12.2 × 11.0 cm) in the right hepatic lobe. Necrotic changes were observed in the mass, and the extent of tumor thrombosis in the intrahepatic and suprahepatic IVC and the RA had decreased. However, multiple newly nodules in both lung (pulmonary metastasis) were detected (Fig. 2). Based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria,[17] overall partial response (PR) was noted. Sorafenib administration was continued and the second TACE was performed in February 2016. After 3 weeks of treatment with second TACE, a follow-up CT (February 26, 2016) revealed more regression of intrahepatic mass, IVC, and RA. However, both pulmonary metastases were aggravated. Fourteen months of sorafenib treatment, 2 sessions of TACE, and a follow-up CT (June 24, 2016) revealed the tumor burden had decreased considerably including both pulmonary metastases, with extensive necrotic areas and no tumoral enhancement, and sustained normalization of the alpha-fetoprotein level was noted (Fig. 3).
Figure 2.

Follow-up abdominal computed tomography (3 months after diagnosis) (CT) revealed about 8.5 × 7.0-cm-sized decreased size of necrotic mass of hepatocellular carcinoma in right hepatic lobe (A), mildly decreased tumoral thrombosis in suprahepatic inferior vena cava (B) and decreased size of metastasis of right atrium (C). Chest CT showed multiple newly detected nodules in both lungs, suggesting pulmonary metastasis (D).
Figure 3.

Two years later, follow-up abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 6.4 × 5.2-cm-sized and significantly reduced necrotic hepatocellular carcinoma in the right hepatic lobe, without tumoral enhancement (A). Nearly resolved tumoral thrombosis in the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (B) and complete resolution of the right atrium metastasis was seen (C). No detectable pulmonary nodules in both lungs on Chest CT (D).
The NK cell activity of our patient was checked, and the value of NK cell activity was significantly higher than normal range (CD56: 54.1%, normal range: 6%–37%). Thirty months after the initial diagnosis, the patient is still alive with no clinical or radiological evidence of tumor recurrence (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Clinical course of the patient. AFP = alpha-fetoprotein, cGy = centigray, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, mRECIST = modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, TACE = transarterial chemoembolization.
3. Discussion
The prognosis of HCC with multiple metastases is very poor. The median survival of these patients without effective treatment has been reported to be as short as 2 to 3 months.[18] According to the SHARP trial and an Asia-Pacific study, only 2% to 3.3% cases had PR and CR was not seen.[9,10] To our knowledge, only 18 cases of stage IV HCC receiving sorafenib or multimodality treatments have achieved CR so far.[19–33] Therefore, we have listed 19 published cases of stage IV HCC in the sequential order of publication, including our case (Table 1). Of these, 18 patients (94.7%) were males. The mean age was 64.3 (range, 46–78) years. The cancer stage as per AJCC TNM staging system was IVA in 21.1% and IVB in 78.9% patients, respectively. The median time to CR was 6 months (1–48 months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) were treated with sorafenib. TACE (63.2%), surgical resection (47.4%), radiofrequency ablation (21.1%), RT (15.8%), and systemic chemotherapy (10.5%) were used as adjuncts. HFSR was seen in 11 patients (57.9%); of these 6 patients were in grade 3 and 5 patients were in grade 2. Diarrhea (5 patients, 26.3%) was the second most common adverse effect. To summarize these case reports, most patients who received sorafenib were males and a significant number of patients suffered HFSR. This is similar to our case.
Table 1.
Review of 19 CR cases of stage IV HCC in English literature.

Some studies have shown that multimodal therapy is effective in advanced HCC with RA metastasis.[34] Sorafenib enhances the radiosensitivity of human HCC cell lines by selectively inhibiting the radiation-induced activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathways, thereby promoting radiation-induced apoptosis.[35] TACE has been reported to be an effective treatment modality for advanced HCC, and there are reports that combined treatment with TACE and sorafenib has better outcomes than TACE alone.[36] There was also a case report of advanced HCC cured by TACE, RT, and surgery without sorafenib.[33] Similar to other reports, concomitant therapy with sorafenib, RT, and TACE might have had a synergistic effect on the patient's prognosis in our case.
A point to note in our case is that the patient's tumor burden rapidly decreased and he eventually achieved CR after the anaphylaxis event. We assume a possible synergistic effect of the anaphylaxis and multimodal treatment in tumoral response. The mechanism might be explained by the elevation of serum tryptase level during anaphylaxis, which indicates activation of the mast cells. Based on the result of recent studies, the activation of mast cells might lead to a selective chemotaxis of the NK cells, which might play a role in anticancer effect. Another study showed that the NK cells led to long-term survival in the livers of nude mice, and inhibited lung metastasis of HCC in vivo.[37] Another study revealed that the quantities and activities of NK cells were significantly lower in HCC patients compared with healthy individuals.[38] In addition, among patients with HCC, a high NK cell number and activity are associated with early stages and improved patient survival.[39,40] Based on the above results, NK cell activity of the patient was checked and to our surprise, subsequent blood tests showed a markedly increased NK cell (CD56) activity compared with the normal levels. Recently, some studies reported that sorafenib might influence the activity of NK cells and play a role in the anticancer effect by modulating macrophages and NK cells.[41,42] In our case, the patient was continuously on sorafenib; it might be useful to check the NK cell activity in patients with advanced HCC receiving sorafenib, for comparison. To compare the NK cell activity of the patient with that of other HCC patients, other patients diagnosed with HCC were considered as a control group and their NK cell activity was measured. Control groups were divided into 3 categories: HCC patients with similar age (n = 3), HCC patients with the same stage of tumor (stage IV) (n = 4), and HCC patients receiving sorafenib (n = 3). The NK cell activity in the HCC patients of similar age was 15.07 ± 8.63%, in HCC patients with the same stage of tumor (stage IV) was 22.48 ± 8.77%, and in HCC patients receiving sorafenib was 13.53 ± 8.59%. The NK cell activity of our patient was significantly higher than that seen in patients of the control groups (CD56: 54.1%, normal range: 6%–37%) (Fig. 5). It is possible that the baseline NK cell level of our patient might have been high, the anaphylaxis might have been an accident, and the high proportion of NK might not be related to the anaphylaxis. However, it is known that NK cell activity is low in HCC patients; after the adjustment for the age of patients, the activity of NK cells is lower in the patients in advanced stage HCC.[43–45] The activity of NK cells in our patient was significantly higher than that in patients with the same stage of disease, of a similar age, and receiving sorafenib. Based on several other study findings,[39,40] we assume that our patient would have had low levels and activities of NK cells when he was diagnosed with HCC with multiple metastases. Therefore, it can be assumed that the activation of mast cells induced by anaphylaxis might have influenced the activation of NK cells in our patient. However, the exact mechanism due to which NK cell levels remained high for a long time after the anaphylaxis is not known.
Figure 5.

Comparison of the natural killer cell activity (CD56) in the patient and in the 3 control groups. The longest transverse bar indicates the average value in each group, the second transverse vertical bar indicates the average value ±2 SD of each group and the shortest transverse bar indicates the average value +3 SD of each group.
There are some limitations in our case. First, we did not check the baseline NK cell level of the patient; hence, we could not compare the baseline NK cell level with the NK cell level after anaphylaxis. Second, the mechanism by which the mast cell activates the NK cell is not understood. Nevertheless, this case report could help develop newer therapies that can improve the prognosis for patients with end-stage liver cancer. In addition, the effect of mast cell activation on NK cells might be worth investigating in the development of therapeutic agents for other cancer patients. Further studies are needed to determine whether the activation of mast cells can activate NK cells and produce anticancer effects.
Author contributions
DHK, EC, SBC, SKC, JY, and CHJ collected patient's data and contributed to manuscript writing. DHK, YIK, SMK, and DWS analyzed data. DWS and CHJ designed research studies and wrote the manuscript.
Conceptualization: Dong Hyun Kim, Eunae Cho.
Data curation: Dong Hyun Kim, Eunae Cho, Sung Bum Cho, Sung Kyu Choi, Jieun Yu, Chung Hwan Jun.
Formal analysis: Sunmin Kim, Young-Il Koh, Da Woon Sim.
Investigation: Dong Hyun Kim, Sunmin Kim.
Methodology: Da Woon Sim.
Visualization: Sunmin Kim.
Writing – original draft: Dong Hyun Kim, Eunae Cho, Sung Bum Cho, Jieun Yu, Chung Hwan Jun.
Writing – review and editing: Dong Hyun Kim, Sung Bum Cho, Sung Kyu Choi, Young-Il Koh, Da Woon Sim, Chung Hwan Jun.
Dong Hyun Kim orcid: 0000-0001-5778-1264.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CHB = chronic hepatitis B, CHC = chronic hepatitis C, CR = complete response, F = female, G = grade, Gl = gland, HFSR = hand–foot skin reaction, IVC = inferior vena cava, LN = lymph node, LT = liver transplantation, M = male, Op = operation, PEI = percutaneous ethanol injection, RA = right atrium, RFA = radiofrequency ablation, TACE = transarterial chemoembolization, TACI = transarterial chemoinfusion.
This study was supported by a grant (CRI 18091-1) from Chonnam National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001;94:153–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, et al. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:909–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Levy I, Sherman M. Liver Cancer Study Group of the University of Toronto Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the CLIP, Okuda, and Child-Pugh staging systems in a cohort of 257 patients in Toronto. Gut 2002;50:881–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F, et al. Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. J Hepatol 2006;44:723–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. Hepatology 1998;28:751–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A, et al. Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology 1999;29:62–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bruix J, Sherman M. American Association for the Study of Liver D. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011;53:1020–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:908–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:378–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:391–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Burke SM, Issekutz TB, Mohan K, et al. Human mast cell activation with virus-associated stimuli leads to the selective chemotaxis of natural killer cells by a CXCL8-dependent mechanism. Blood 2008;111:5467–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Abraham SN, St John AL. Mast cell-orchestrated immunity to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:440–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 2011;331:44–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Tonn T, Becker S, Esser R, et al. Cellular immunotherapy of malignancies using the clonal natural killer cell line NK-92. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 2001;10:535–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Sun C, Sun HY, Xiao WH, et al. Natural killer cell dysfunction in hepatocellular carcinoma and NK cell-based immunotherapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2015;36:1191–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2010;30:52–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Zeng ZC, Fan J, Tang ZY, et al. A comparison of treatment combinations with and without radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein and/or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:432–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].So BJ, Bekaii-Saab T, Bloomston MA, et al. Complete clinical response of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma to sorafenib in a patient with hemochromatosis: a case report. J Hematol Oncol 2008;1:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Yeganeh M, Finn RS, Saab S. Apparent remission of a solitary metastatic pulmonary lesion in a liver transplant recipient treated with sorafenib. Am J Transplant 2009;9:2851–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Kudo M, Ueshima K. Positioning of a molecular-targeted agent, sorafenib, in the treatment algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma and implication of many complete remission cases in Japan. Oncology 2010;78suppl 1:154–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Inuzuka T, Nishikawa H, Sekikawa A, et al. Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report. Oncology 2011;81Suppl. 1:152–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Chelis L, Ntinos N, Souftas V, et al. Complete response after sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in an HIV-HBV co infected patient: Possible synergy with HAART ? A case report. Med Oncol 2011;28Suppl. 11:S165–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Irtan S, Chopin-Laly X, Ronot M, et al. Complete regression of locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma induced by sorafenib allowing curative resection. Liver Int 2011;31:740–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Mizukami H, Kagawa T, Arase Y, et al. Complete response after short-term sorafenib treatment in a patient with lymph node metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Case Rep Oncol 2012;5:380–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Du J, Qian X, Liu B. Long-term progression-free survival in a case of hepatocellular carcinoma with vertebral metastasis treated with a reduced dose of sorafenib: Case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2013;5:381–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Lulla PD, Brammer JE, Bandeali S, et al. Sustained complete remission of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma with single agent sorafenib. J Gastrointest Cancer 2013;44:98–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Kim MS, Jin YJ, Lee JW, et al. Complete remission of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by sorafenib: a case report. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2013;5:38–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hagihara A, Teranishi Y, Kawamura E, et al. A complete response induced by 21-day sorafenib therapy in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Intern Med 2013;52:1589–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Poullenot F, Bioulac-Sage P, Laumonier H, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated by sorafenib with complete radiological response according to mRECIST criteria: could we stop the treatment? About four cases. Acta Oncol 2014;53:420–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Simao A, Silva R, Correia L, et al. Advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple metastasis and vascular thrombosis: a case of complete response to sorafenib. Acta Med Port 2016;29:139–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Nakano N, Kawaoka T, Aikata H, et al. Complete response to short-term sorafenib treatment alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with bone, lymph node, and peritoneum metastases. Hepatol Res 2016;46:1402–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Jung H, Km BI, Cho YK, et al. Complete cure of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with right adrenal gland metastasis and portal vein thrombosis by multiple applications of an interdisciplinary therapy: case report with 8-year follow up. Clin Mol Hepatol 2017;[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Jun CH, Sim DW, Kim SH, et al. Risk factors for patients with stage IVB hepatocellular carcinoma and extension into the heart: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:379–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Yu W, Gu K, Yu Z, et al. Sorafenib potentiates irradiation effect in hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett 2013;329:109–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Han K, Kim JH, Ko GY, et al. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal venous tumor thrombosis: a comprehensive review. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:407–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Hong ZF, Zhao WX, Yin ZY, et al. Natural killer cells inhibit pulmonary metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in nude mice. Oncol Lett 2016;11:2019–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Cheung PF, Yip CW, Ng LW, et al. Restoration of natural killer activity in hepatocellular carcinoma by treatment with antibody against granulin-epithelin precursor. Oncoimmunology 2015;4:e1016706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Hoechst B, Voigtlaender T, Ormandy L, et al. Myeloid derived suppressor cells inhibit natural killer cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the NKp30 receptor. Hepatology 2009;50:799–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Sun H, Sun C, Tian Z, et al. NK cells in immunotolerant organs. Cell Mol Immunol 2013;10:202–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Cao M, Xu Y, Youn JI, et al. Kinase inhibitor Sorafenib modulates immunosuppressive cell populations in a murine liver cancer model. Lab Invest 2011;91:598–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Sprinzl MF, Reisinger F, Puschnik A, et al. Sorafenib perpetuates cellular anticancer effector functions by modulating the crosstalk between macrophages and natural killer cells. Hepatology 2013;57:2358–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Chuang WL, Liu HW, Chang WY. Natural killer cell activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma relative to early development and tumor invasion. Cancer 1990;65:926–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Taketomi A, Shimada M, Shirabe K, et al. Natural killer cell activity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new prognostic indicator after hepatectomy. Cancer 1998;83:58–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Cai L, Zhang Z, Zhou L, et al. Functional impairment in circulating and intrahepatic NK cells and relative mechanism in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Clin Immunol 2008;129:428–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
