Skip to main content
PMC home page
Viruses logoLink to Viruses
. 2018 Oct 10;10(10):552. doi: 10.3390/v10100552

Potential Application of Bacteriophages in Enrichment Culture for Improved Prenatal Streptococcus agalactiae Screening

Jumpei Uchiyama 1,*, Hidehito Matsui 2, Hironobu Murakami 1, Shin-ichiro Kato 3, Naoki Watanabe 1, Tadahiro Nasukawa 1, Keijiro Mizukami 1, Masaya Ogata 1, Masahiro Sakaguchi 1, Shigenobu Matsuzaki 4, Hideaki Hanaki 2
PMCID: PMC6213948  PMID: 30308933

Abstract

Vertical transmission of Streptococcus agalactiae can cause neonatal infections. A culture test in the late stage of pregnancy is used to screen for the presence of maternal S. agalactiae for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. For the test, a vaginal–rectal sample is recommended to be enriched, followed by bacterial identification. In some cases, Enterococcus faecalis overgrows in the enrichment culture. Consequently, the identification test yields false-negative results. Bacteriophages (phages) can be used as antimicrobial materials. Here, we explored the feasibility of using phages to minimize false-negative results in an experimental setting. Phage mixture was prepared using three phages that specifically infect E. faecalis: phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22. The mixture inhibited the growth of 86.7% (26/30) of vaginal E. faecalis strains. The simple coculture of E. faecalis and S. agalactiae was used as an experimental enrichment model. Phage mixture treatment led to suppression of E. faecalis growth and facilitation of S. agalactiae growth. In addition, testing several sets of S. agalactiae and E. faecalis strains, the treatment with phage mixture in the enrichment improved S. agalactiae detection on chromogenic agar. Our results suggest that the phage mixture can be usefully employed in the S. agalactiae culture test to increase test accuracy.

Keywords: phage, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus agalactiae, culture enrichment

1. Introduction

Streptococcus agalactiae (also called group B Streptococcus) is vertically transmitted to the newborn during delivery, and can cause neonatal infections [1,2]. Common early-onset diseases caused by this organism in infants include sepsis and pneumonia, and (rarely) meningitis [1,2]. To prevent such infections, a prenatal S. agalactiae culture test is recommended in the late stage of pregnancy [1,2]. In the case of a positive test result, the pregnant carrier is prophylactically treated with antibiotics to prevent vertical transmission of S. agalactiae during the intrapartum period [1,2].

For the S. agalactiae culture test, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention highly recommend an enrichment culture, followed by conventional S. agalactiae identification [3,4]. In the culture test, a swab is taken from the vaginal and anorectal areas, and the samples are inoculated and cultured in an enrichment culture broth selective for S. agalactiae. After the enrichment culture, bacterial identification is performed, e.g., using the Christie–Atkins–Munch-Petersen test, serologic identification, growth on chromogenic agar, and nucleic acid amplification [4]. However, although a selective culture broth is used for the enrichment culture, S. agalactiae is poorly recovered along with overgrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in some cases [5,6,7,8]. This may lead to false-negative results in the subsequent identification tests [5,6,7,8]. To address this problem, selective antimicrobial agents to be included in the enrichment broth should be reevaluated.

Bacteriophages (phages), i.e., bacterial viruses, infect specific bacteria. Some phages infect and lyse bacteria at the specificity level of species and strains. These phage characteristics were used to eliminate most cells in a bacterial population and facilitate the isolation of less prevalent environmental bacteria that produce novel bioactive compounds [9]. Phage applicability for the isolation of food-poisoning microbes in the food microbiology field was also examined [10]. Hence, potentially, phage application might also be used to reduce the unwanted growth of E. faecalis in an S. agalactiae enrichment culture and to facilitate S. agalactiae detection in clinical microbiology. Indeed, phages that specifically infect E. faecalis were isolated from environmental samples, such as sewage and canal water [11,12,13]. In the current study, we examined the applicability of E. faecalis-specific phages to suppress E. faecalis growth in an S. agalactiae enrichment culture in an experimental setting.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria, Phages, and Culture Media

Strains of E. faecalis (n = 30), S. agalactiae (n = 7), Enterococcus avium (n = 5), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 5) were isolated from vaginal swabs using the Chrom-ID Strepto B test (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). The swabs were obtained after random sampling at local hospitals in eastern Japan (Table S1). Bacteria were cultured at 37 °C under aerobic or microaerobic (i.e., 5% CO2) conditions, as appropriate, based on their specific growth requirements (Table S1).

Phage phiEF24C was isolated and characterized, as described elsewhere [12,14,15]. Phage phiEF17H was newly isolated from canal water in Kochi (Japan). Phage phiM1EF22 was newly isolated from sewage water in Tokyo (Japan) (Table S2). The isolation procedures are described in Reference [12]. E. faecalis strains KUEF01, KUEF25, and KUEF27, described in Table S1, were used as host bacteria for phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22, respectively, for phage amplification and plaque assay. Bacterial-phage suspensions were cultured aerobically at 37 °C.

Enterococcus spp. and phages were cultured in tryptic soy broth or agar (TSA), and S. agalactiae was cultured in Todd–Hewitt broth (THB), unless stated otherwise. Granada-type broth (GtB; 25.0 g/L proteose peptone no. 3, 14.0 g/L soluble starch, 2.5 g/L glucose, 1.0 g/L pyruvic acid sodium salt, 0.1 g/L cysteine hydrochloride, 0.3 g/L magnesium sulfate, 11.0 g/L 3-(N-morpholino)propane sulfonic acid, 10.7 g/L disodium hydrogen phosphate, 0.5 mg/L crystal violet, 10 mg/L colistin sulfate, 10 mg/L metronidazole, and 15 mg/L nalidixic acid, pH 7.4) was originally prepared as the S. agalactiae enrichment broth [16,17]. Alternatively, the pigmented enrichment Lim broth (modified Lim broth; Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial, Tokyo, Japan) was used as an S. agalactiae enrichment broth. Unless stated otherwise, all culture media were purchased from Becton, Dickinson, and Co. (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan) and FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan).

2.2. Phage Genome Sequencing and Analysis

After phage amplification, phage particles were purified from 500 mL of phage lysate by CsCl density-gradient centrifugation, as described elsewhere [18]. Phage genomic DNA was then prepared by phenol–chloroform extraction of the collected purified phage band [18]. A shotgun library was prepared for each phage DNA using the GS FLX Titanium rapid library preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were analyzed using a GS Junior 454 sequencer (Roche Diagnostics, Risch-Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The sequence reads were assembled using the 454 Newbler software (version 3.0; 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA). The genomes were annotated using a prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline, DFAST (https://dfast.nig.ac.jp/) [19,20]. The phiEF17H and phiM1EF22 genome sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers AP018714 and AP018715, respectively.

The genome sequences were analyzed using nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome; last accessed: 5 May 2018). Moreover, the genomes of phages belonging to the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae were downloaded from GenBank (last accessed: 20 September 2018), and the viral phylogeny was analyzed using a proteomic tree analysis tool, ViPTree version 1.0 [21].

2.3. Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of E. faecalis Strains

E. faecalis strains were cultured overnight, bacterial DNA was extracted, and MLST analysis was performed, according to the procedures described elsewhere [22]. The sequence alleles were analyzed using the E. faecalis MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/efaecalis/; last accessed: 5 January 2018) to designate sequence types (STs) [23]. The concatenating allele sequences were analyzed using MEGA 7.0.18, and sequence alignment implemented in ClustalW was followed by phylogenetic tree construction using the unweighted pair group with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method [24].

2.4. Examination of Antibacterial Activity of E. faecalis to S. agalactiae

The anti-S. agalactiae activity of E. faecalis was examined using a spot-on-lawn assay, as described elsewhere [25]. Briefly, 200 μL of overnight bacterial culture of a single S. agalactiae strain was mixed with a melted 0.5% (w/v) soft agar and plated onto 1.5% (w/v) agar. One microliter of E. faecalis overnight culture was spotted on the solidified top agar. After incubation overnight at 37 °C in a microaerophilic condition, S. agalactiae growth around the spotted E. faecalis was examined.

2.5. Analysis of Phage Lytic Activity

The phage host range was determined by a streak test, as described elsewhere [12,15]. Briefly, 200 μL of overnight bacterial culture of a single bacterial strain was mixed with a melted 0.5% (w/v) soft agar and plated onto 1.5% (w/v) agar. The phage suspension (ca. 1.0 × 108–9 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL) was streaked onto the solidified top agar. After incubation overnight at 37 °C, bacterial lysis, with or without plaque formation, was examined.

2.6. Analysis of Bacterial Densities in S. agalactiae and E. faecalis Coculture with Phage Mixtures

A rifampicin-resistant mutant clone of S. agalactiae was isolated by aerobically culturing S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2 on TSA containing 20 μg/mL rifampicin at 37 °C for two days. The putative mutant clones were repurified at least three times; each repurification round was repeated for one day under the same incubation conditions. One resultant rifampicin-resistant mutant clone of strain KUGBS2 was obtained and was tentatively designated as strain KUGBS2rif. S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and E. faecalis strain KUEF08 were cultured individually until an optical density of 0.4–0.6 at 600 nm was attained. After diluting with the enrichment broth, suspensions of 3.0 × 104 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and 3.0 × 107 CFU/mL E. faecalis strain KUEF08 were prepared. Each phage suspension was diluted with THB to ca. 3.0 × 106 PFU/mL or 3.0 × 104 PFU/mL. By mixing equal volumes of phage suspensions at the same dilution, mixtures of two different dilutions of phages were prepared.

For the experiment, 100 μL each of S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and E. faecalis strain KUEF08, and 300 μL of phage mixture were added to 10 mL of the enrichment broth. As negative controls, the same volume of THB was added instead of bacterial suspensions and/or phage suspensions. The mixtures were microaerobically incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Total bacterial density and S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and E. faecalis strain KUEF08 densities were determined. Total bacterial densities were determined on TSA. TSA supplemented with 20 μg/mL rifampicin and Enterococcus-selective agar (EF agar base “Nissui”; Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan) were used to determine the densities of S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and E. faecalis strain KUEF08, respectively. S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif did not grow on the Enterococcus-selective agar; E. faecalis strain KUEF08 did not grow on TSA containing 20 μg/mL rifampicin.

2.7. Detection of Bacteria on Chromogenic Selective Agar after S. agalactiae and E. faecalis Coculture with Phage Mixtures

S. agalactiae and E. faecalis were cultured individually until an optical density of 0.4–0.6 at 600 nm was obtained. S. agalactiae and E. faecalis cultures were diluted with THB to ca. 3.0–5.0 × 104 CFU/mL and ca. 3.0 × 107 CFU/mL, respectively. After dilution of individual phage suspensions in THB to ca. 1.0 × 107 PFU/mL, the phage mixture was prepared by mixing equal volumes of the diluted phage suspensions.

For the experiment, 30 μL each of bacterial suspensions of S. agalactiae and E. faecalis, and 30 μL of phage mixture were added to 3 mL of the enrichment broth. As a negative control, the same volume of THB was added instead of the phage mixture. After 24-h incubation at 37 °C, a loopful of the suspension was inoculated on the Chrom-ID Strepto B agar (BioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France). After 24-h incubation at 37 °C in darkness, colony color and appearance on agar plates were examined. All incubations were carried out under microaerophilic conditions.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were statistically analyzed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [26]. Student’s t-tests were used to analyze differences between bacterial densities in different treatments. A p-value < 0.01 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phage Characteristics

Phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 were used in the current study. Phage phiEF24C, one of the best-studied Enterococcus phages, is classified into the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae [12,14,15]. The other two phages, phiEF17H and phiM1EF22, were newly isolated and their whole genomes were sequenced. The whole-genome sequence similarity analysis using the BLASTn showed that phages phiEF17H and phiM1EF22 are similar to phage phiEF24C (Table S3). Thus, they were considered to be classified into the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae [27]. Moreover, the phylogenetic relationship of these three phages used in this study was analyzed with 33 other phages of the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae. Phages sharing this particular viral taxonomy of the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae are highly virulent toward host bacteria [28]. The tree showed that phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 were phylogenetically clustered but slightly different from each other among the Enterococcus phages belonging to this viral subfamily (Figure 1A). These Enterococcus phages may be categorized into a new virus genus in this subfamily.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Enterococcus phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 and their lytic activity to various E. faecalis strains. (A) Viral proteomic trees of Enterococcus phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 in the family Myoviridae subfamily Spounavirinae. Enterococcus phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 are shown in bold. Phage taxonomical names are shown followed by the GenBank accession number in parentheses. The phages belonging to a certain viral genus are shown in grey highlight, on which the viral genus names are indicated. (B) E. faecalis strains isolated from vaginal swabs and their sensitivity to phages. Phylogenetic tree of E. faecalis strains was constructed based on the concatenated multilocus sequence typing (MLST) alleles. In the phylogenetic tree, E. faecalis strain names are followed by sequence types (STs) in brackets. Phage sensitivities to each phage and phage mixture are shown below the phylogenetic tree.

3.2. Characteristics of E. faecalis Strains Isolated from Vaginal Swabs

The genetic background of E. faecalis strains isolated from the vaginal swabs in this study was examined. MLST analysis of the E. faecalis vaginal swab isolates revealed that 43.3% (13/30) of E. faecalis strains were phylogenetically closely related, representing either ST16 or ST179 (Figure 1B). The remaining strains (56.7% (17/30)) were genetically diverse. Moreover, E. faecalis strains do not seem to show antibacterial activity (e.g., bacteriocin production) to S. agalactiae, while some of them are able to show antibacterial activity to a variety of bacteria [5,29]. Testing the antibacterial activity to S. agalactiae strains using the spot-on-lawn assay, no anti-S. agalactiae activity was observed among these E. faecalis strains.

3.3. Phage Lytic Spectrum and Phage Mixture

Phage lytic activity was examined with a streak test using these E. faecalis strains (Figure 1B). Phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 showed lytic activity toward 63.3% (19/30), 76.7% (23/30), and 66.7% (20/30), respectively, of the tested E. faecalis strains. Because these phages have slightly different genomes, they have different host ranges to E. faecalis strains. Moreover, lytic activities of the three phages with other bacterial vaginal swab isolates (E. avium, E. faecium, and S. agalactiae strains) were also examined, but no lytic activity was observed.

Phages phiEF24C, phiEF17H, and phiM1EF22 lysed different E. faecalis strains and also some common strains. Theoretically, a combination of these three phages lysed a broader range of E. faecalis strains than any single phage tested. A phage mixture containing the three phages was prepared by mixing phage particles in a 1:1:1 ratio, which was also used in the following experiments. The lytic spectrum of the phage mixture was then examined using the streak test described above. The phage mixture showed lytic activity toward 86.7% (26/30) of E. faecalis strains tested (Figure 1B). Four E. faecalis strains were not lysed by the phages, namely, KUEF02 (MLST ST47), KUEF18 (ST64), KUEF15 (ST30), and KUEF28 (ST179). Because these bacterial strains may have several phage-resistant mechanisms [30], they cannot be lysed with these phages in the phage mixture. In addition, the phage mixture did not show any lytic activity with the other tested bacteria, i.e., E. avium, E. faecium, and S. agalactiae, as seen in the assessments of lytic activity of individual phages as above.

The phage mixture may have been contaminated with anti-S. agalactiae agents during phage mixture preparation (i.e., during phage propagation on the E. faecalis host). The antimicrobial activity of the phage mixture to S. agalactiae was examined. Incubation of the phage mixture with S. agalactiae for 30 min and 24 h did not influence bacterial viability, compared with a THB-treated negative control (Figure S1), excluding the possibility of phage mixture contamination with anti-S. agalactiae substances. Thus, the phage mixture could be used as anti-E. faecalis agents in the enrichment broth to examine the suppression of E. faecalis growth in S. agalactiae enrichment culture.

3.4. Effect of Phage Mixture on S. agalactiae and E. faecalis Cell Densities in Experimental Enrichment Cultures

The vaginal microbiome of pregnant women is majorly composed of Lactobacillus spp., together with the bacteria of phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and others in minor quantities [31,32,33]. During the culture of swab seed in S. agalactiae-selective enrichment broth, the growth of the majority of vaginal microflora is inhibited and a minority, including S. agalactiae, E. faecalis, and other bacteria, are selectively grown when they are presented in the swab. In this study, a situation in which E. faecalis thrives and S. agalactiae grows poorly was mimicked in an experimental setting, using a simple coculture of E. faecalis and S. agalactiae in S. agalactiae-selective enrichment broth. Using the model, the effects of the phage mixture were then examined.

The simple coculture of E. faecalis and S. agalactiae in S. agalactiae-selective enrichment broth was used as an experimental enrichment model, which mimicked the situation of poor recovery of S. agalactiae. In the experimental enrichment model, S. agalactiae and E. faecalis cell densities were monitored in the presence and absence of the phage mixture over time. To mimic the situation in which S. agalactiae was poorly recovered, S. agalactiae strain KUGBS2rif and E. faecalis strain KUEF08 were inoculated into GtB at 3.0 × 102 CFU/mL and 3.0 × 105 CFU/mL, respectively. Either of the two dilutions of phage mixture (at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of each phage of 10−1 and 10−3 to E. faecalis) was added. As a negative control, THB was used instead of the phage mixture.

Bacterial cell densities (total bacteria, S. agalactiae, and E. faecalis) were then monitored over time (Figure 2). Firstly, based on the determined total bacteria numbers in both the negative control and phage treatment groups, bacteria grew exponentially for up to 12 h, following which the cultures entered the stationary phase of growth (Figure 2). Hence, incubation for 12–24 h was sufficient to achieve bacterial enrichment in that particular experimental setting. Moreover, S. agalactiae cell densities were compared with E. faecalis cell densities at different time points in the negative control and phage treatment groups. In the negative control group (i.e., no phage treatment), E. faecalis densities were significantly higher than S. agalactiae at incubation for 6, 12, and 24 h (p < 0.01) (Figure 2A). In contrast, in the phage treatment groups at MOIs of 10−1 and 10−3 of each phage, the cell density of E. faecalis was significantly lower than that of S. agalactiae at incubation for 6, 12, and 24 h in the phage treatment groups (p < 0.01) (Figure 2B,C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Growth of E. faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae cocultures in the presence or absence of phage mixtures in Granada-type broth (GtB). No phage treatment (A); or treatment with phages at 10−3 (B) or at 10−1 (C) multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of each phage to E. faecalis. The means with standard deviations were calculated from triplicate experiments, and are plotted as points with error bars. Time points at which S. agalactiae density was significantly higher than that of E. faecalis are indicated by asterisks (p < 0.01; Student’s t-test).

We also evaluated the effectiveness of phage treatment in the experimental enrichment model using the commercially available pigmented enrichment Lim broth (modified Lim broth) (Figure S2). The experiments were performed using the same method described above. Inhibition of E. faecalis growth, compared with the untreated group, was observed in the phage treatment groups at both MOIs of each phage tested (i.e., 1 and 10−2) (Figure S3). These results indicate that the phage mixture inhibited E. faecalis growth and facilitated S. agalactiae growth in both S. agalactiae enrichment broths.

3.5. Efficient Detection of S. agalactiae after Experimental Enrichment Culture in the Presence of the Phage Mixture

In the S. agalactiae culture test, bacteria are generally identified in a culture aliquot after enrichment culture. Consequently, we then evaluated the efficiency of S. agalactiae identification after the experimental enrichment culture. As the identification assay, we used growth on the S. agalactiae chromogenic agar, in which S. agalactiae colonies are distinguished from E. faecalis colonies based on color. Five S. agalactiae–E. faecalis sets were tested: KUGBS2–KUEF08, KUGBS1–KUEF24, KUGBS6–KUEF26, KUGBS4–KUEF21, and KUGBS7–KUEF29. E. faecalis and S. agalactiae strains were first inoculated at a 100:1 ratio in the Granada-type enrichment broth; then, the phage mixture was added (at an MOI of each phage at 10−1 to E. faecalis), and the cultures were incubated. Enrichment culture aliquots were plated on chromogenic agar, and the resultant colony appearance was evaluated (Figure 3). After enrichment of all phage-treated S. agalactiae–E. faecalis sets, S. agalactiae colonies were dominant on the agar plates. By contrast, in enrichment cultures without phage treatment, only a few S. agalactiae colonies were observed on the chromogenic agar, while E. faecalis colonies were dominant. The same experiment was performed using the modified Lim broth and several S. agalactiae–E. faecalis combinations (Figure S4). The data were in agreement with observations made using the GtB. Thus, the phage mixture treatment is believed to improve the S. agalactiae culture test by inhibiting the undesirable growth of E. faecalis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Bacterial identification on chromogenic agar after experimental enrichment coculture of S. agalactiae and E. faecalis. Combinations of single strains of E. faecalis and S. agalactiae were used to inoculate GtB, and were cultured in the presence of the phage mixture (MOI of each phage to E. faecalis: 10−1) or Todd–Hewitt broth (THB). After enrichment culture, aliquots were spread on the chromogenic agar, and the resultant bacterial colonies were evaluated. Colonies of S. agalactiae and E. faecalis are red and blue, respectively. Top and bottom panels show photographs of chromogenic agar plates inoculated with enriched cultures treated with THB or phage mixtures, respectively. Representative data for three out of five S. agalactiae–E. faecalis sets are shown, namely, KUGBS2–KUEF08 (A), KUGBS1–KUEF24 (B), and KUGBS6–KUEF26 (C).

3.6. Phage Application Potential in the Clinical Setting

In the current study, we showed that a specific phage mixture effectively inhibited the growth of E. faecalis in an S. agalactiae culture test in the experimental setting. Before clinical application and reagent manufacture, it is necessary to discuss issues such as the phage composition in the phage mixture, the usage per assay (i.e., volume and phage density), storage of the phage mixture, and production cost.

As a first consideration, strains insensitive to the phage mixture may occur at a higher than expected rate in the clinical setting. To address this issue, phage sensitivity of E. faecalis strains should be constantly examined. The effective spectrum of phages in a mixture can be modified by replacing and/or adding other phages, including newly isolated phages, naturally evolved phages, and/or genetically modified phages [34,35]. For example, by adding six newly isolated phages to the phage mixture developed in the current study, we increased the inhibition efficiency among the tested E. faecalis strains to 96.7% (29/30). Hence, updating the composition of the phage mixture will help address the problem associated with the phage-insensitive strains.

Next, we considered the usage per assay. Assuming that the volume of the enrichment broth is ca. 3–4 mL, a drop of phage mixture suspension (i.e., 30–50 μL of a solution of ca. 1.0 × 107 PFU/mL of each phage) would suffice for an assay. Such usage per assay is in line with the usage of the phage mixture in the experiments performed in the current study (Figure 3). Thus, the phage mixture complies with the usage expected in a clinical setting.

Importantly, the quality of the phage mixture should be guaranteed to allow its commercialization. Phages are generally stable at 4 °C in culture media for a certain period of time [36,37], which suggests that phage products can be distributed on a market scale using the cold chain. Accordingly, we examined the infectious density of each phage solution during storage at 4 °C for 270 days; we did not observe any substantial reduction in phage particle density during this period (Figure S5). The shelf life of culture medium is generally up to six months [38]; no loss in sensitivity in S. agalactiae enrichment broths was observed after at least four months [39]. Thus, the stability of the phage mixture appears to be in line with the storage of the enrichment broths.

Finally, the use of phage mixture should be cost-effective. Phage production on a bioreactor scale was recently investigated because of increased interest in phage therapy. Consequently, the cost of phage production is estimated to be $4.4 × 10−13/phage particle [40,41,42]. Hence, the calculated cost of the phage mixture per assay in the current study is only $2.2 × 10−7 ($4.4 × 10−13/phage particle multiplied by the number of phage particles in the mixture, i.e., 1.0 × 107 PFU/mL × 50 μL). A number of commercial phage companies were established worldwide [43]. Thus, in theory, phage mixtures may be produced for the S. agalactiae culture test in a cost-effective manner.

After commercialization of the phage mixture, special attention should be devoted to the biological characteristics of phages to avoid laboratory accidents, because clinical tests are at high risk of interference by phage contamination via aerosols. For example, Enterococcus phages may contaminate clinical E. faecalis culture tests and interfere with the test results in a clinical laboratory. To avoid such accidents, appropriate good laboratory hygiene and sterilization practices should be instated when preparing to use phage products. Such measures can include aseptic handling at a specified bench (e.g., safety cabinet), change of gloves and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation of the bench after usage, and storage in a specific cabinet [44]. We believe that the phage mixture is appropriate for use in the clinical laboratory, as long as the knowledge about phage products is disseminated and implemented. Thus, we anticipate that the phage mixture will become commercially available for S. agalactiae enrichment broths in the future and will be used in the clinical setting.

Acknowledgments

We thank Takuya Nakajima and Mio Sasaki (School of Veterinary Medicine, Azabu University, Kanagawa, Japan) for support in performing the experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/10/10/552/s1: Table S1: Bacterial strains used in the current study; Table S2: Phages used in the current study; Table S3: Genome sequences of Enterococcus phages used in this study; Figure S1: Examination of the anti-S. agalactiae effects of the phage mixture; Figure S2: Color change of the pigmented modified Lim broth with bacterial growth; Figure S3: Effects of the phage mixture on bacteria inoculated in a commercially available S. agalactiae enrichment broth; Figure S4: Bacterial identification on chromogenic agar after experimental enrichment coculture of S. agalactiae and E. faecalis; Figure S5: Phage stability.

Click here for additional data file. (1.1MB, pdf)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.U., H.M. (Hidehito Matsui), and H.H. Methodology, J.U. and H.M. (Hidehito Matsui). Software, J.U. and K.M. Validation, J.U. and T.N. Formal analysis, J.U. and S.K. Investigation, J.U., S.K., N.W., and M.O. Resources, J.U., H.M. (Hidehito Matsui), S.M., and H.H. Data curation, M.S. Writing—original draft preparation, J.U. and W.N. Writing—review and editing, J.U., H.M. (Hidehito Matsui), H.M. (Hironobu Murakami), T.N., K.M., and S.M. Visualization, J.U. and T.N. Supervision, J.U. Project administration, J.U. Funding acquisition, J.U. and M.S.

Funding

This research was partially supported by 2017 and 2018 research project grants awarded by the Azabu University Research Services Division.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Morgan J.A., Cooper D.B. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2018. Pregnancy, group b streptococcus. (updated on 11 February 2018) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Edmond K.M., Kortsalioudaki C., Scott S., Schrag S.J., Zaidi A.K., Cousens S., Heath P.T. Group b streptococcal disease in infants aged younger than 3 months: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:547–556. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61651-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cagno C.K., Pettit J.M., Weiss B.D. Prevention of perinatal group b streptococcal disease: Updated cdc guideline. Am. Fam. Physician. 2012;86:59–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosa-Fraile M., Spellerberg B. Reliable detection of group b streptococcus in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017;55:2590–2598. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00582-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunne W.M., Jr., Holland-Staley C.A. Comparison of nna agar culture and selective broth culture for detection of group b streptococcal colonization in women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36:2298–2300. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.8.2298-2300.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park C.J., Vandel N.M., Ruprai D.K., Martin E.A., Gates K.M., Coker D. Detection of group b streptococcal colonization in pregnant women using direct latex agglutination testing of selective broth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:408–409. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.408-409.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Binghuai L., Yanli S., Shuchen Z., Fengxia Z., Dong L., Yanchao C. Use of maldi-tof mass spectrometry for rapid identification of group b streptococcus on chromid strepto b agar. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;27:44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baden M., Higashiyama T., Ikemoto T., Okada Y. Evaluation of direct latex agglutination of selective broth for detection of group b streptococcal carriage in pregnant women. J. Jpn. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2016;26:7–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kurtböke D. Actinophages as indicators of actinomycete taxa in marine environments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2005;87:19–28. doi: 10.1007/s10482-004-6535-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muldoon M.T., Teaney G., Li J., Onisk D.V., Stave J.W. Bacteriophage-based enrichment coupled to immunochromatographic strip-based detection for the determination of salmonella in meat and poultry. J. Food Prot. 2007;70:2235–2242. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.10.2235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Khalifa L., Coppenhagen-Glazer S., Shlezinger M., Kott-Gutkowski M., Adini O., Beyth N., Hazan R. Complete genome sequence of enterococcus bacteriophage eflk1. Genome Announ. 2015;3:e01308–e01315. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01308-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uchiyama J., Rashel M., Maeda Y., Takemura I., Sugihara S., Akechi K., Muraoka A., Wakiguchi H., Matsuzaki S. Isolation and characterization of a novel enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage phief24c as a therapeutic candidate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008;278:200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khalifa L., Gelman D., Shlezinger M., Dessal A.L., Coppenhagen-Glazer S., Beyth N., Hazan R. Defeating antibiotic- and phage-resistant enterococcus faecalis using a phage cocktail in vitro and in a clot model. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:326. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Uchiyama J., Rashel M., Takemura I., Wakiguchi H., Matsuzaki S. In silico and in vivo evaluation of bacteriophage phief24c, a candidate for treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:4149–4163. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02371-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uchiyama J., Takemura I., Satoh M., Kato S., Ujihara T., Akechi K., Matsuzaki S., Daibata M. Improved adsorption of an Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage phief24c with a spontaneous point mutation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de la Rosa M., Perez M., Carazo C., Pareja L., Peis J.I., Hernandez F. New granada medium for detection and identification of group b streptococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992;30:1019–1021. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.1019-1021.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heelan J.S., Struminsky J., Lauro P., Sung C.J. Evaluation of a new selective enrichment broth for detection of group b streptococci in pregnant women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:896–897. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.896-897.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nasukawa T., Uchiyama J., Taharaguchi S., Ota S., Ujihara T., Matsuzaki S., Murakami H., Mizukami K., Sakaguchi M. Virus purification by cscl density gradient using general centrifugation. Arch. Virol. 2017;162:3523–3528. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3513-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tanizawa Y., Fujisawa T., Nakamura Y. Dfast: A flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1037–1039. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tanizawa Y., Fujisawa T., Kaminuma E., Nakamura Y., Arita M. Dfast and daga: Web-based integrated genome annotation tools and resources. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health. 2016;35:173–184. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.16-003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nishimura Y., Yoshida T., Kuronishi M., Uehara H., Ogata H., Goto S. Viptree: The viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2379–2380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ruiz-Garbajosa P., Bonten M.J., Robinson D.A., Top J., Nallapareddy S.R., Torres C., Coque T.M., Cantón R., Baquero F., Murray B.E., et al. Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecalis reveals hospital-adapted genetic complexes in a background of high rates of recombination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:2220–2228. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02596-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jolley K.A., Maiden M.C. Bigsdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kumar S., Stecher G., Tamura K. Mega7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vijayakumar P.P., Muriana P.M. A microplate growth inhibition assay for screening bacteriocins against Listeria monocytogenes to differentiate their mode-of-action. Biomolecules. 2015;5:1178–1194. doi: 10.3390/biom5021178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “ezr” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–458. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lefkowitz E.J., Dempsey D.M., Hendrickson R.C., Orton R.J., Siddell S.G., Smith D.B. Virus taxonomy: The database of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses (ictv) Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D708–D717. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Klumpp J., Lavigne R., Loessner M.J., Ackermann H.W. The spo1-related bacteriophages. Arch. Virol. 2010;155:1547–1561. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0783-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nes I.F., Diep D.B., Holo H. Bacteriocin diversity in streptococcus and enterococcus. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:1189–1198. doi: 10.1128/JB.01254-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.van Houte S., Buckling A., Westra E.R. Evolutionary ecology of prokaryotic immune mechanisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016;80:745–763. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00011-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rosen G.H., Randis T.M., Desai P.V., Sapra K.J., Ma B., Gajer P., Humphrys M.S., Ravel J., Gelber S.E., Ratner A.J. Group b streptococcus and the vaginal microbiota. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;216:744–751. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rick A.M., Aguilar A., Cortes R., Gordillo R., Melgar M., Samayoa-Reyes G., Frank D.N., Asturias E.J. Group b streptococci colonization in pregnant guatemalan women: Prevalence, risk factors, and vaginal microbiome. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2017;4:ofx020. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nuriel-Ohayon M., Neuman H., Koren O. Microbial changes during pregnancy, birth, and infancy. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1031. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ando H., Lemire S., Pires D.P., Lu T.K. Engineering modular viral scaffolds for targeted bacterial population editing. Cell Syst. 2015;1:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koskella B., Brockhurst M.A. Bacteria-phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014;38:916–931. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ackermann H., Tremblay D., Moineau S. Long-term bacteriophage preservation. WFCC Newsl. 2004;38:35–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lobocka M.B., Glowacka A., Golec P. Methods for bacteriophage preservation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1693:219–230. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ulisse S., Peccio A., Orsini G., Di Emidio B. A study of the shelf-life of critical culture media. Vet. Ital. 2006;42:237–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carvalho Mda G., Facklam R., Jackson D., Beall B., McGee L. Evaluation of three commercial broth media for pigment detection and identification of a group b Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:4161–4163. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01374-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Agboluaje M., Sauvageau D. Bacteriophage production in bioreactors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1693:173–193. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krysiak-Baltyn K., Martin G.J.O., Gras S.L. Computational modeling of bacteriophage production for process optimization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1693:195–218. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krysiak-Baltyn K., Martin G.J.O., Gras S.L. Computational modelling of large scale phage production using a two-stage batch process. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2018;11:31. doi: 10.3390/ph11020031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Forde A., Hill C. Phages of life-the path to pharma. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018;175:412–418. doi: 10.1111/bph.14106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Los M., Czyz A., Sell E., Wegrzyn A., Neubauer P., Wegrzyn G. Bacteriophage contamination: Is there a simple method to reduce its deleterious effects in laboratory cultures and biotechnological factories? J. Appl. Genet. 2004;45:111–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Viruses are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES