Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2018 Nov 2;9:4589. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07042-y

Sex specific function of epithelial STAT3 signaling in pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung cancer

Mauricio S Caetano 1,#, Maya Hassane 2,#, Hieu T Van 1, Emmanuel Bugarin 1,3, Amber M Cumpian 1, Christina L McDowell 4, Carolina Gonzalez Cavazos 1, Huiyuan Zhang 5, Shanshan Deng 1,6, Lixia Diao 7, Jing Wang 7, Scott E Evans 1, Carmen Behrens 8, Ignacio I Wistuba 4, Susan A W Fuqua 9, Huang Lin 10, Laura P Stabile 11, Stephanie S Watowich 5, Humam Kadara 2,4,12,✉,#, Seyed Javad Moghaddam 1,13,✉,#
PMCID: PMC6214980  PMID: 30389925

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs) with mutations in the K-ras oncogene display dismal prognosis. Proinflammatory and immunomodulatory events that drive development of K-ras mutant LUAD are poorly understood. Here, we develop a lung epithelial specific K-ras mutant/Stat3 conditional knockout (LR/Stat3Δ/Δ) mouse model. Epithelial Stat3 deletion results in intriguing sex-associated discrepancies; K-ras mutant tumors are decreased in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice whereas tumor burdens are increased in males. RNA-sequencing and tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis demonstrate increased anti-tumor immune responses following Stat3 deletion in females and, conversely, elevated pro-tumor immune pathways in males. While IL-6 blockade in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice reduces lung tumorigenesis, inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling in female mice augments K-ras mutant oncogenesis and reprograms lung TME toward a pro-tumor phenotype. Our data underscore a critical sex-specific role for epithelial Stat3 signaling in K-ras mutant LUAD, thus paving the way for developing personalized (e.g. sex-based) immunotherapeutic strategies for this fatal disease.


Proinflammatory and immunomodulatory events that drive development of K-ras mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are poorly understood. Here they develop a lung epithelial specific K-ras mutant/Stat3 conditional knockout mouse model and show a sex-specific role for epithelial Stat3 signaling in K-ras-mutant LUAD.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide1. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the major histological type of lung malignancy diagnosed2. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common histological subtype of NSCLC accounting for over 50% of diagnosed lung cancer cases2,3. The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (K-ras) is the most commonly mutated oncogene in LUADs (~25–30%) particularly in those that developed in lifetime smokers4,5. Compared to other solid tumors and molecular lung cancer subtypes, K-ras mutant LUAD displays a dismal prognosis and is resistant to most forms of systemic or targeted therapies5. These facts warrant the urgent need to develop new or improved strategies for early treatment of K-ras mutant LUAD—advances that heavily rest on understanding molecular underpinnings of this particular type of lung malignancy.

Accumulating evidence suggests that tumor-promoting inflammation is a major hallmark of cancer6,7. Interestingly, LUAD patients with increased serum levels of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6811 and high numbers of inflammatory cells in the lung tumor microenvironment (TME) were shown to exhibit a relatively poor prognosis12,13. We and others have demonstrated that inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6) can reprogram the lung TME and promote lung tumorigenesis6,1416. In this context, a better understanding of the role of inflammation and the immune microenvironment in lung carcinogenesis may shed light on new high-potential targets for therapy (e.g. immune-based therapy).

Earlier work demonstrated that the proliferative, survival, and angiogenic effects of IL-6 on epithelial cells are mediated by the STAT3 pathway17,18. Activation of STAT3, an IL-6-responsive transcription factor, was shown to induce tumor-promoting inflammation as well as activate canonical oncogenic pathways18,19. In our previous work, we revealed a crucial role for IL-6-mediated signaling in K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis16 using a mouse model we had previously developed in which a mutated form of K-ras was expressed specifically in airway cells under the control of the club cell secretory protein (CCSP) promoter20. The STAT3 pathway was found to be aberrantly activated during the development of K-ras mutant lung tumors in this model, and this activity was attenuated by treatment with an antibody against IL-616, suggesting a crucial role for inflammation through IL-6/STAT3 signaling in K-ras-induced tumorigenesis. Yet, STAT3-dependent contextual cues in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung malignancy remain largely unexplored.

To better understand the role of the STAT3 pathway in K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis, we here derive a lung epithelial-specific K-ras mutant/Stat3 conditional knockout (LR/Stat3Δ/Δ) mouse model. We find that deletion of epithelial Stat3 decreased K-ras mutant-driven lung tumorigenesis in female mice, yet led to a surprising outcome in male littermates, who exhibit the opposite effect of enhanced malignancy. Functional pathway and immune TME analyses reveal differential immune phenotypes among Stat3-deleted female and male mice carrying the K-ras mutation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that inhibition of estrogen signaling in female mice augments K-ras mutant lung cancer development. Our data reveal markedly disparate sex contextual effects on K-ras mutant lung cancer development via differential reprogramming of lung onco- and immune- phenotypes, thus providing insights into potential new strategies for personalized (e.g. sex-based) immunotherapy.

Results

Sex-differential effects of Stat3 deletion on lung tumor

We previously revealed a crucial role for IL-6-mediated signaling as well as aberrant Stat3 activity in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung cancer16,20. Yet, Stat3-dependent contextual cues in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung malignancy remain largely unknown. To fill this void, we derived CC-LR mice with conditional deletion of Stat3 in epithelial cells (LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice). We then compared lung tumorigenesis in CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. Initial analyses revealed no significant differences in tumor number between CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. Further analysis, however, demonstrated remarkable sex-differential (i.e., disparity) tumor development in LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to CC-LR littermates evidenced by disparate tumor numbers (Fig. 1) and areas (Supplementary Figure 1). We found that while female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited significantly lower tumor burdens including proliferating lesions, evidenced by Ki-67 positivity, compared to female CC-LR mice (Fig. 1a, b), the opposite was true of male littermates (Fig. 1c, d). Male mice with deletion of epithelial Stat3 displayed elevated tumor burdens and Ki-67 immunoreactivity compared to male CC-LR animals (Fig. 1c, d). Additionally, lungs of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited reduced expression of the angiogenic marker, CD31 protein, relative to CC-LR littermates, whereas male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited augmented CD31 amounts (Supplementary Figure 2). These findings demonstrate that epithelial Stat3 functions in a sex-dependent manner in K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Epithelial Stat3 deletion induces sex-associated differences in K-ras mutant tumor burden. Lung surface tumor number (left panel) and histopathologic appearance (40× magnification, scale bar = 100 μm) of the lung in female (red circles, n = 12–14) (a) and male (blue squares, n = 12–15) (c) CC-LR (middle panel) and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ (right panel) mice at the age of 14 weeks. Quantitative analysis (left panel) and representative lung photomicrographs (20× magnification, scale bar = 50 μm) of positive tumor cells for Ki-67 in female (n = 11–14) (b) and male (n = 12–14) (d) CC-LR (middle panel) and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ (right panel) mice at the age of 14 weeks. (Data represent means ± standard error of mean (SEM); ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.005 using two-tailed t-test, experimental replicate # 3–4)

Sex-specific immune programs associated with Stat3 deletion

Our findings on stark sex-associated differences in the effect of epithelial Stat3 deletion on K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis prompted us to survey global gene expression programs and signaling cues downstream of epithelial Stat3. We performed whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) of total lungs from male and female CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice at the age of 14 weeks (n = 3 each group; n = 12 total). Using the Ion Torrent Proton, we sequenced an average of 42 million reads per specimen (Supplementary Table 1). To determine sex-dependent differentially expressed transcripts between LR/Stat3Δ/Δ and CC-LR mice, we employed a mixed effects model with terms for genotype and sex modeling in the interaction between the two factors (see Methods section). Using a P< 0.01 (mixed effects-model/ANOVA), we identified 339 transcripts that were differentially regulated among females and males in LR/Stat3Δ/Δ relative to CC-LR mice (Supplementary Data 1). Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed sex-differential effects of the identified differentially expressed transcripts evidenced by co-clustering of male CC-LR mice with female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts as well as female CC-LR mice with male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ animals (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Sex-differential immune expression programs in lungs of epithelial-specific K-ras mutant Stat3 deficient mice. a Whole-transcriptome sequencing of whole lungs from 14-week-old CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ male and female mice (n = 3 within each genotype and sex group; n = 12 total) was performed using the Ion Torrent Proton platform and as described in the Methods section. Differentially expressed transcripts (n = 339) were identified using a mixed-effects model as described in the Methods section and analyzed by clustering. Rows represent gene features and columns denote samples (yellow, upregulated compared to median sampled; blue, downregulated expression). b Differentially expressed transcripts were functionally and topologically analyzed by pathways and gene set analysis using IPA as described in the Methods section. The gene–gene interaction networks depict significantly predicted inhibition of leukocyte migration and associated gene sets in Stat3-deleted males with the opposite pattern in the female counterparts (orange, activated molecular function; blue, inhibited molecular function; red, upregulated expression; green, downregulated expression)

We then sought to gain insights into sex-associated functional signaling cues downstream of epithelial Stat3 deletion. We performed paired pathways and genes set enrichment analyses of the identified 339 transcripts independently in males and females followed by cross-comparison of both functional interrogations. These functional interrogations revealed largely disparate pathway and gene set deregulation following epithelial Stat3 deletion in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to male littermates (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Pathways analysis revealed significant predicted activation of signaling pathways mediated by Nfat and phospholipase C (all P < 0.01, Fisher’s test) following epithelial Stat3 deletion in female CC-LR mice as opposed to stipulated inhibition of these pathways in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts (Supplementary Table 2). Gene set enrichment analysis also demonstrated predicted activation of canonical pro-tumor genes or sets following epithelial Stat3 deletion in males including cyclin D1 (CCND1; z-score = 1.4), c-AMP response element binding protein 1 (CREB1; z-score = 2.0), and insulin growth factor receptor 1 (IGFR1; z-score = 1.9) (all P < 0.05 of the Fisher’s test), with all these genes predicted to be inhibited in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts (Supplementary Table 3). Gene set enrichment analysis also revealed predicted activation of T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling (z-score = 2.6; P = 0.003 of the Fisher’s test) following epithelial Stat3 deletion in female CC-LR mice with the opposite pattern (inhibition of TCR signaling; z-core = −2.0) occurring in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ littermates (Supplementary Table 3). Of note, further analysis linking differential gene expression and aberrant biological functions revealed a modulation of various gene sets overall pointing to marked dampening of the host anti-tumor immune response (e.g. gene sets associated with leukocyte migration) following Stat3 deletion in male CC-LR mice (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Data 2). In stark contrast, gene set analysis revealed increased activation of the anti-tumor immune response in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to CC-LR mice of the same sex (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Data 2). Genes typifying attenuated leukocyte migration in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice included decreased expression of Cd4, Cd8a, Cd19, and Cd3e with opposite patterns of expression (upregulation of those genes) in female counterparts (Fig. 2b). These data point to differential modulation of the host anti-tumor immune response following epithelial Stat3 deletion and during K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis in female (activated) and male (inhibited) CC-LR mice.

Interplay between sex, Stat3, and lung TME

Our RNA-Seq data prompted us to survey the effects of epithelial Stat3 deletion on the lung TME, in male and female CC-LR mice. We determined immune cellular composition in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from 14-week-old female tumor-bearing littermates. This analysis showed that the female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to CC-LR littermates exhibited significantly reduced numbers of white blood cells (WBCs), including macrophages (Fig. 3a). No changes were observed in neutrophil or lymphocyte counts in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice versus CC-LR littermates (Fig. 3a). We next measured by quantitative real-time PCR the expression levels of a panel of inflammatory genes in the whole lung normalized to expression of CD45, a pan-hematopoietic marker (Fig. 3b). We found significantly reduced expression of immunosuppressive genes, arginase 1 (Arg1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (Ido), in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to CC-LR littermates (Fig. 3b) suggestive of reduced pro-tumor type 2 macrophage polarization and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) responses and enhanced T-cell activation. Female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice also concurrently exhibited significantly decreased expression levels of the macrophage chemoattractant chemokine ligand 2 (Ccl2) and of the interleukin 6 (Il6) cytokine (Fig. 3b)—in accordance with the observed decrease in the number of macrophages observed (Fig. 3a). Our expression analysis also pointed to attenuated expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine transforming growth factor beta (Tgfb) and of Il17 in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to CC-LR littermates which in combination with reduced Il6 expression are suggestive of decreased T regulatory (Treg) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells infiltration or differentiation. Furthermore, our data revealed increased expression of interferon gamma (Ifng) and granzyme B (Gzmb) in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 3b), suggesting anti-tumor immune responses in Stat3-deleted females. Similar to female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice, BALF of male Stat3-deleted counterparts also exhibited significantly reduced numbers of total WBCs and macrophages (Fig. 3c). Interestingly, BALF of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to male CC-LR littermates exhibited significantly increased levels of neutrophils (Fig. 3c). This effect was accompanied by increased expression of the Cxcl1 gene in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 3d). Of note and in sharp contrast to female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts, BALF of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited significantly elevated levels of Ido and Il6, and decreased expression of Ifng and Gzmb (Fig. 3d). No changes were observed in Ccl2, Tgfb, and Tnfa expression in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 3d). These results suggest increased protumor (type 2) immune responses (M2 macrophage polarization, induction of MDSCs and Treg responses) and decreased Th1 and CD8 T-cell activation in male LR/STAT3Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 3d) relative to female Stat3-deleted counterparts (Fig. 3b). Concordantly, we also noted increased NF-κB activation, evidenced by increased p65 DNA-binding activity, in tumors from male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to male CC-LR littermates (Supplementary Figure 3a) but not in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts (Supplementary Figure 3b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Epithelial Stat3 deletion changes the lung tumor microenvironment in a sex-dependent manner. Total inflammatory cell and lineage-specific leukocyte numbers from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of female (n = 7) (a) and male (n = 5–7) (c) CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice at the age of 14 weeks. Relative expression of Arg1, Ido, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Il6, Tgfb, Il17, Tnfa, Ifng and Gzmb mRNA in whole lungs of female (b) and male (d) CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ mice at the age of 14 weeks, normalized by CD45 expression (data represent means ± SEM; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.005; *P < 0.05 using two-tailed t-test, experimental replicate # 2-3). WBC, white blood cell

Based on our finding on the increased number of infiltrated neutrophils in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice, we sought to probe the specific role of these immune cells in K-ras mutant lung tumor development following Stat3 deletion. As expected, treatment of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice with anti-Ly6G completely abrogated neutrophils and decreased total WBC counts (Fig. 4b). This effect was accompanied by reduced numbers of lung macrophages and lymphocytes following anti-Ly6G treatment (Fig. 4b). Of note, depletion of neutrophils using an anti-Ly6G antibody in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice significantly decreased the tumor burden when compared with isotype control-treated mice (IgG2) (Fig. 4a). This effect was accompanied by significantly decreased expression of Il6 and Cxcl1 levels as well as markedly and significantly increased expression of the anti-tumor and/or cytotoxic immune genes nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2), Ifng, T-box transcription factor 21 (Tbx21), and Gzmb (Fig. 4c). These findings suggest that epithelial Stat3 deletion reprograms the K-ras mutant lung TME in a sex-differential manner via NF-κB-mediated induction of a CXCL1-driven neutrophilic response.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Neutrophil depletion inhibits K-ras mutant lung tumors in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. a Lung surface tumor number in 14-week-old male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice treated with control (IgG2) (n = 4) or anti-Ly6G (n = 4) antibody. b Total inflammatory cell and lineage-specific leukocyte numbers from BALF of control (n = 4) or anti-Ly6G antibody treated (n = 4) male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. c Relative expression of Arg1, Ido, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Il6, Tgfb, Il17, Tnfa, Ifng and Gzmb mRNA in whole lungs, normalized by CD45 expression, of LR/Stat3Δ/Δ male mice treated with control (n = 4) or anti-Ly6G (n = 4) antibody (data represent means ± SEM; ***P < 0.001; **P< 0.005; *P < 0.05 using two-tailed t-test, experimental replicate # 2-3). WBC, white blood cells

Anti-tumor effects of IL-6 blockade in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice

Our data demonstrating increased levels of Il6 expression in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to both female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ counterparts and male CC-LR littermates prompted us to assess the effects of IL-6 blockade on lung tumor development and the immune microenvironment—in the context of epithelial Stat3 deletion and male sex. We treated male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice with a monoclonal antibody against IL-6 for 8 weeks, prior to lung and BALF collection. We observed that male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice treated with anti-IL-6 antibody exhibited significantly decreased lung tumor burdens compared with male littermates treated with control IgG1 antibody (Fig. 5a). This effect was associated with a significant reduction of total WBC counts assessed in BALF of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice (Fig. 5b). Treatment with anti-IL-6 antibody led to significant decreases in the number of lymphocytes as well as macrophages along with a reduction in the number of neutrophils albeit not reaching statistical significance (Fig. 5b). Gene expression analysis of immune cells in the whole lung demonstrated significantly reduced levels of immune markers indicative of an immune-suppressive protumor (type 2) microenvironment, e.g., Arg1, Tgfb, Il17, Tnfa, and Foxp3, in anti-IL-6-treated male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice relative to littermates treated with control IgG1 antibody (Fig. 5c). Conversely, treatment of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice with anti-IL-6 antibody resulted in significantly increased expression levels of immune markers indicative of M1 macrophage polarization, Th1 differentiation and/or cytotoxic (CD8 T/NK cell) anti-tumor response (Ifng, Tbx21, and Gzmb) (Fig. 5c). Of note, IL-6 blockade did not alter the expression levels of Ido, Cxcl1, and Ccl2; however, interestingly treatment with anti-IL-6 antibody suppressed Il6 expression (Fig. 5c). These findings suggest that IL-6 signaling promotes K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis downstream of epithelial Stat3 deletion in male mice and blockade of the cytokine reformats the lung TME toward an anti-tumor phenotype.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

IL-6 blockade reduces K-ras-induced lung tumorigenesis in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. a Lung surface tumor number in 14-week-old male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice after treatment with control (IgG1) (n = 5) or anti-IL-6 (n = 3) antibody. b Total inflammatory cell and lineage-specific leukocyte numbers from BALF of control (n = 5) or anti-IL-6-treated (n = 3) male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. c Relative expression of Arg1, Ido, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Il6, Tgfb, Il17, Tnfa, Ifng, Foxp3, Tbx21, and Gzmb mRNA in whole lungs, normalized by CD45 expression, of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice after treatment with control (n = 5) or anti-IL-6 (n = 3) antibody (data represent means ± SEM; **P < 0.005, *P < 0.05 using two-tailed t-test, experimental replicate # 2–3)

Effects of estrogen receptor blockade in LR/Stat3Δ/Δ females

We surmised that aberrant sex hormone signaling may be implicated in the observed sex-associated differences in K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis in the context of epithelial Stat3 deletion. To probe this supposition, we blocked estrogen receptor (ER) signaling by tamoxifen in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. We observed that tamoxifen-treated female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited significantly elevated tumor burdens in comparison to control mice (Fig. 6a). This effect was associated with significantly decreased WBC counts, including macrophages, whereas lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were increased (Fig. 6b). In line with these observations, tamoxifen treatment of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice overall resulted in increased levels of immune markers in whole lung indicative of immune suppression and a protumor response (e.g. Arg1, Ccl2, Il6, Tgfb, Il17, Foxp3, Ido) in comparison with controls. Tamoxifen treatment also resulted in significantly decreased expression of immune genes implicated in Th1 differentiation and the cytotoxic anti-tumor response such as Ifng, Tbx21, and Gzmb (Fig. 6c). Of note, we further examined our RNA-Seq data, probing for functional topological gene networks that were predicted to be significantly modulated following epithelial Stat3 deletion in males and females. A mechanistic network comprising beta-estradiol signaling (P-value of overlap = 6.8 × 10−5; Supplementary Figure 4) was activated in female mice with epithelial Stat3 deletion and that comprised elevated expression of T-cell markers (CD4 and CD3); suggesting potential cues linking estrogen signaling activation and anti-tumor immune mechanisms. Interestingly, analysis of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) by IHC in human LUADs demonstrated a significant positive correlation between pSTAT3 and ERβ in females (P = 0.04) but not in males (P = 0.17) (Supplementary Figure 5). Overall, these results suggest a critical role for estrogen signaling in maintaining an anti-tumor microenvironment, thereby decreasing K-ras lung tumor development following Stat3 deletion in female mice.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Estrogen receptor blockade promotes lung tumorigenesis in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. a Lung surface tumor number in 14-week-old female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice after corn oil (n = 8) or tamoxifen (n = 3) treatment. b Total inflammatory cell and lineage-specific leukocyte numbers from BALF of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice after corn oil (n = 4) or tamoxifen (n = 3) treatment. c Relative expression of Arg1, Ido, Ccl2, Il6, Tgfb, Il17, Tnfa, Ifng, Tbx21, Foxp3, and Gzmb mRNA in whole lungs, normalized by CD45 expression, of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice after corn oil (n = 4) or tamoxifen (n = 3) treatment (data represent means ± SEM; **P < 0.005, *P < 0.05 using two-tailed t-test, experimental replicate # 2-3)

Discussion

Here we sought to understand the role of the epithelial STAT3 pathway in the development of K-ras mutant lung cancer. Toward this, we developed and studied a K-ras mutant induced mouse model (CC-LR) with conditional deletion of epithelial specific Stat3 (LR/Stat3Δ/Δ). Interestingly, we discovered marked sex-associated differences in lung tumor burdens due to the lack of epithelial Stat3—tumor burden was significantly reduced in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice whereas tumorigenesis was markedly augmented in male counterparts. Whole-transcriptome analysis by RNA-Seq revealed a notable differential modulation of the host immune response among female and male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. The sex-associated differences in tumor burden were concordantly accompanied by enhanced anti-tumor immune responses in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice and, conversely, elevated pro-tumor immune phenotypes in the male counterparts. Additional immune phenotype analysis suggested that augmented pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung tumors in male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice was, in part, mediated by various immune mechanisms, that are possibly non-mutually exclusive, including increased NF-κB activation, IL-6 induction, and a CXCL1-mediated neutrophilic response. Of note, targeting studies using tamoxifen revealed a crucial role for ER signaling in counteracting K-ras mutant lung cancer pathogenesis following Stat3 deletion in female mice. All in all, our findings demonstrate a critical sex-differential role for epithelial STAT3 signaling in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung cancer. We surmise that there exist signaling cues that link activated estrogen signaling and anti-tumor immune responses in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung cancer (Fig. 7). Our findings suggest the plausible use of sex-driven personalized immunotherapeutic approaches for this aggressive malignancy.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Mechanisms underlying sex-associated function of epithelial STAT3 signaling in K-ras mutant lung cancer. Our findings suggest that there is a differential regulation of NF-κB activation in K-ras mutant STAT3-deficient lung epithelium within sex, and estrogen signaling plays a protective role in females by reducing the activation of NF-κB pathway and subsequent induction of an anti-tumor immune response. It also suggests that activation of NF-κB pathway in the lung of male mice drives the tumor-promoting effect of STAT3 deficiency probably by induction of IL-6 and CXCL1, and subsequent recruitment of neutrophils and induction of a pro-tumor immunosuppressive response

A major observation of our study was the marked sex disparity in lung oncogenesis following epithelial Stat3 deletion in mice with induced mutant K-ras. This is in line, albeit indirectly, with various earlier human studies demonstrating that male lung cancer patients exhibit relatively poorer prognosis and response to treatment compared to female patients21,22. Our observations prompted us to further investigate global cues underlying these disparate sex-associated effects by RNA-Seq. RNA-Seq profiling coupled with functional pathways and gene set enrichment analyses demonstrated differentially expressed profiles, gene sets, and networks that indicated a disparate modulation of the host immune response among male and female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. Among these immune gene profiles, we noted that Il21r, Cd19, Cd4, Cd8, and Cd3 were largely augmented in females following Stat3 deletion, whereas those genes were conversely suppressed in Stat3-deleted males. Further analysis by qRT-PCR also showed elevated expression of genes indicative of an anti-tumor immune response such as Ifng and Gzmb in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. It is noteworthy that earlier studies have shown that human lung tumors with CD4+, CD8α+, CD3+ (T-cell), and B-cell tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) overall exhibit better prognosis compared to immunologically mute (cold) tumors2326. Our findings here, in the context of previous reports, strongly suggest that the lungs of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibit an anti-tumor host immune response.

In sharp contrast to their female counterparts, we found that male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited largely increased expression of Il6 compared to male CC-LR mice. Further, blockade of IL-6 in male mice significantly inhibited lung tumorigenesis with concomitant reformatting of the lung TME toward an anti-tumor phenotype characterized by an increased expression of the cytotoxic immune response (e.g. Gzmb) and a decreased expression of Tgfb and Foxp3, markers of tumor-promoting Treg response27. It is important to mention that in the mouse models we employed, Stat3 was conditionally and selectively depleted only in airway epithelium. Thus, it is plausible and likely that the tumor stroma and immune microenvironment still contains Stat3 which may be functionally targeted by IL-6 blockade. Indeed previous studies10, as well as our prior16 and present findings, point to crucial tumor-promoting roles for IL-6/STAT3 signaling, including that in the TME, in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung malignancy. A parallel observation from our immune profiling analysis was that the lungs of male LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice exhibited increased expression levels of neutrophil chemoattractant, Cxcl1, in comparison to male CC-LR mice. Also, depletion of neutrophils by anti-Ly6G antibody significantly reduced lung tumorigenesis while reformatting the lung TME toward an anti-tumor phenotype. These findings are in line with previous studies showing the role of neutrophils, the dominant suppressive immune cell population in human NSCLC28, in supporting cancer development and progression in murine K-ras mutant lung cancer2932. It is important to note that NF-κB activation promotes carcinogenesis largely by transactivation of a battery of chemokines and cytokines including IL-6, CXCL1, and CCL23336. Indeed, further analysis in our study revealed that male, but not female, K-ras mutant induced mice with Stat3 deletion exhibited elevated p65 transcriptional activity, indicative of NF-κB activation. Our findings are in line with previous reports demonstrating that NF-κB signaling is activated in K-ras mutant lung cancer36,37. It is plausible to surmise that NF-κB activity downstream of K-ras mutations and Stat3 deletion is disparate between males (increased activation) and females (decreased NF-κB activity) and this may be in part due to differential activation of estrogen signaling (Fig. 7). Our findings strongly suggest that the TME in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice is primed toward an anti-tumor phenotype when compared to female CC-LR mice, whereas the TME in male counterparts is reformatted toward a pro-tumor phenotype.

The role of downstream STAT3 signaling in K-ras mutant lung cancer remains poorly understood18. Earlier studies have shown that STAT3 mediates tumor-promoting inflammation in part by inhibiting expression of activators of anti-tumor immunity19,3840. On the other hand, the report by Zhou and colleagues demonstrated that the role of STAT3 signaling in lung cancer pathogenesis is contextually dependent on the stage of tumorigenesis with STAT3 exhibiting contrasting roles in tumor initiation and progression41. Also, inhibition (by genetic targeting) of STAT3 signaling has been shown to promote K-ras mutant-induced LUAD initiation and progression in vivo concomitant with elevated IL-8 levels largely due to NF-κB activation; suggesting that STAT3 can exhibit lung tumor-suppressive properties42. It is worthwhile to mention that the report by Grabner and colleagues utilized male mice only42. Thus, these earlier reported findings on the link between STAT3 signaling, NF-κB activation, and K-ras mutant lung cancer pathogenesis are in close agreement with our present data showing increased lung tumor burdens in K-ras mutant-induced male mice specifically following epithelial Stat3 deletion. Our present study further sheds light on the role of STAT3 signaling in K-ras mutant lung cancer pathogenesis by highlighting stark sex disparity in this process and showing, in contrast, attenuated tumorigenesis in female mice with Stat3 deletion. It is important to note that the report by Crncec and colleagues demonstrated sex-specific tumor suppressor and anti-tumor immune roles for another Stat, Stat1, in colitis-associated colorectal cancer in male but not female mice43. Our findings suggest that, similar to Stat143, epithelial Stat3 may exhibit sex-specific lung tumor suppressor roles in males.

Treatment of female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice with tamoxifen significantly increased lung tumor burden. These findings underscore an important role for ER signaling in restricting K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis following Stat3 deletion. Our results are in line, albeit indirectly, with previous studies revealing a positive correlation between tumoral expression of ERβ and relatively favorable overall and disease-free survival44,45. Also, ERβ, particularly the subunit 1, was shown to induce apoptosis of NSCLC cells46. It is important to mention that despite the increased risk of lung cancer development in peri/post-menopausal women compared to pre-menopausal females47, the suggested relationship between sex hormones and lung tumorigenesis remains controversial. Earlier studies have shown that postmenopausal women receiving hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) exhibited reduced risk for lung cancer48. On the other hand, other reports demonstrated an increased risk for lung cancer in post-menopausal women receiving HRT as well as relatively poor prognosis among female lung cancer patients treated with hormone replacement4951. Also, earlier studies have suggested a pro-tumorigenic role for estrogen signaling in the pathogenesis of lung cancer52. It is worthwhile to mention that there are conflicting reports on the association of ERβ expression in female NSCLC patients with clinical outcome44,45,5355. Estrogen and its receptor ERβ were shown to promote lung tumorigenesis in vivo56. Also, cigarette smoke exposure was demonstrated to increase the levels of estrogen metabolites, which in turn were shown to transactivate various oncogenes including K-ras57. It is noteworthy that previous studies demonstrated differential levels of carcinogenic estrogen metabolites between tumor and normal lung tissue and between males and females58. It is possible that these estrogen metabolites are disparately present in lungs of Stat3-deleted male and female mice and may underlie the effects of tamoxifen we observed; suppositions that can be further scrutinized in future studies. Reasons underlying the opposing reported observations on the role of estrogen signaling in lung tumorigenesis are not clear. It is plausible to assume that estrogen signaling in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant LUAD particularly may be distinct from that in other subtypes of lung cancer. This supposition can be scrutinized and discrepancies could be resolved by future mechanistic studies. It is also plausible that effects of estrogen signaling on lung tumor pathogenesis need to be evaluated in the context of specific cell signaling pathways or oncophenotypes (e.g. IL-6-STAT3 signaling). Along these lines, we found a significant positive correlation between the protein levels of pSTAT3 and ERβ in female but not male LUADs, suggesting a link between estrogen and STAT3 signaling in females. It is important to note that our study demonstrated that estrogen signaling impinges on the immune TME and, subsequently, on K-ras mutant lung tumorigenesis following Stat3 deletion. Specifically, inhibition of estrogen signaling was accompanied by reformatting the TME toward a pro-tumor phenotype evidenced by upregulated expression of Il6, Tgfb, and Il17 among other pro-tumor immune markers. Our findings are in agreement, albeit indirectly, with previous reports that underscored the effects of estrogen in reducing Th17 cell activity59 and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-660, as well as increasing IFNγ production, Th1, and CD8 T-cell responses59. It is noteworthy, and as mentioned above, we found increased NF-κB activation downstream of Stat3 deletion in males compared to females. It is conceivable that estrogen signaling may negatively impinge on NF-κB activity, thus, leading to the observed attenuated pro-inflammatory (e.g. IL-6) cues in the lung immune TME in females following Stat3 deletion (Fig. 7). All in all, dissecting the mechanisms underlying the dynamic interplay between estrogen/ER signaling, KRAS/STAT3 pathways in the lung tumor TME, which are poorly understood, may provide viable targets and strategies for personalizing targeted and immunotherapeutic modalities against K-ras mutant lung cancer (e.g. by sex). For example, we can potentially suggest that females with lung tumors comprising K-ras mutations and loss of Stat3 in a pre-menopause stage are not ideal candidates for anti-IL-6 therapy, while it might be a good strategy for males with similar genetic and expression profile. However, when females reach menopause, IL-6 blockade might be an alternative approach to HRT which should be taken with precaution due to its side effects.

Taken together, our study underscores a sex-differential role for epithelial STAT3 signaling in the development of K-ras mutant lung cancer. Our findings also highlight that these sex-differential effects were accompanied by disparate host immune responses, characterized by an elevated pro-tumor immune response in males but increased anti-tumor immunity in female LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice. Mechanistically, we found that absence of epithelial STAT3 in males promotes lung tumorigenesis via enhanced IL-6 signaling and neutrophilic inflammation, which in turn is curtailed by estrogen/ER signaling in females. Overall, our study points to novel signaling cues in the interplay between STAT3/NF-κB pathways, estrogen signaling, and the lung tumor immune microenvironment in the pathogenesis of K-ras mutant lung cancer, thus offering opportune targets and/or strategies for new personalized therapies against this malignancy using already available agents (e.g. anti-IL-6 antibodies, STAT3 inhibitors, or HRT).

Methods

Animal housing and experiments

CCSPCre/LSL-K-rasG12D mice (CC-LR) were generated as previously described20. Briefly, this is a mouse generated by crossing a mouse harboring the LSL-K-rasG12D allele with a mouse containing Cre recombinase inserted into the CCSP locus. LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice were generated by crossing Stat3 conditional knockout mice61, kindly provided by Dr. John DiGiovanni (the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX), with CC-LR mice. All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions and handled in accordance with the institutional animal care and use committee of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Mice were monitored daily for evidence of disease or death.

Human LUAD analysis

Informed consents were obtained from all the subjects under approved institutional review board protocols at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and at the University of Pittsburgh. Messenger RNA of target molecules in association with clinical outcome was studied in available data from the Profiling of Resistance patterns and Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Evaluation of Cancers of the Thorax (PROSPECT) expression dataset62. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) of 118 LUADs (65 female; 53 male) obtained from the University of Pittsburgh were stained for pSTAT3 and ERβ by immunohistochemistry. Using specific antibodies for pSTAT3 (Clone D3A7; 1:400 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology) and ERβ (MCA1974ST; 1:20 dilution; Abd Serotec), pSTAT3 was scored for the percentage of positive tumor cells and the intensity on a scale of 0–3. The H-score of 0–300 was calculated by multiplying the percentage score and the intensity score. ERβ was scored as the total score of both nuclear and cytoplasmic as described previously54. Tumors were considered positive for pSTAT3 and ERβ if at least two cores per case were positive. Correlation between pSTAT3 and ERβ was statistically evaluated using Spearman correlation.

IL-6 blockade

Six-week-old male CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with 20 mg/kg dose of an anti-IL-6 monoclonal (MP520F3, R&D, Minneapolis, MN) or IgG1 Isotype control (Clone: 43414, R&D, Minneapolis, MN) antibodies twice a week for 8 weeks16.

Neutrophil depletion

Six-week-old male CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice were injected IP with 20 mg/kg dose of anti-mouse Ly6G (Clone: 1A8, catalog no.: BP0075-1, Bioxcell, West Lebanon, NH) antibody or IgG2A (Clone: C1.18.4, catalog no.: BE0085, Bioxcell, West Lebanon, NH) twice a week for 8 weeks.

ER blockade

Six-week-old female CC-LR and LR/Stat3Δ/Δ mice were injected IP with 10 mg/mL of tamoxifen (Sigma, catalog no.: T5648) diluted in corn oil, daily for 8 weeks.

Assessment of lung tumor burden and inflammation

Mice were anesthetized by IP injection of Avertin (Sigma), and their tracheas were cannulated with a blind needle of the appropriate size and sutured into place. Lung surface tumor numbers were counted if visible; then in some of the mice, the lungs were perfused with PBS through the right heart, inflated with 10% buffered formalin (Sigma), removed and processed for histological analysis as we had done previously16. Multiple hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from each mouse (three mice per group) were scanned and ImageScope 12.3.3 (Leica, Nussloch, Germany) was used to measure areas of tumor and whole lung. Tumor area (T) was measured by circling individual tumor spots and lung area (L) was determined by circling the whole lung area while major airways, thymus, and heart were excluded. Tumor/lung area percentages were calculated using the respective formula; Tumor/Lung Area =i=1i=nTiL × 100%. In some mice, BALF was obtained by sequentially instilling and collecting two aliquots of 1 mL PBS through a tracheostomy cannula. The lungs were snap frozen and stored for RNA analysis. Total leukocyte count in BALFs was determined using a hemocytometer; differential cell populations were determined by cytocentrifugation of BALF followed by Wright–Giemsa (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) staining.

Histochemistry/immunostaining

H&E staining was done as we had described previously16. The H&E-stained slides were examined by a pathologist blinded to genotype and treatment, and the proliferative lesions of the lungs were evaluated in accordance with the recommendations of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium63. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for evaluating the expression of target proteins was performed using Ki-67 (1:200; ab16667; Abcam, MA, USA), and CD31 (1:50, 550274, BD Biosciences, CA, USA) antibodies as done previously16. The numbers of labeled positive cells for these markers were quantitated as a fraction of total tumor nuclei per high power field (40×) in 10 fields from three mice of each group. Results were expressed as a percentage of positive cells ± standard error of mean (SEM).

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the whole lung according to the TRIzol reagent protocol (Invitrogen, NY, USA) and purified by E.Z.N.A. total RNA kit I (OMEGA, GA, USA). Reverse transcription PCR was performed using the qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD). qPCR was performed according to a standard protocol using SYBR Green FastMix, Low ROX (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD) and products measured on an ABI Viia 7 PCR system (ABI, Foster City, CA). Data are presented as fold change between the test groups and controls, as indicated in the figure legends. Gene-specific primers are listed in Supplementary Table 4.

Measurement of NF-κB activity in lung tissues

Lung tissues were homogenized, and nuclear proteins were isolated according to NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagent (Thermo Scientific, USA). Nuclear protein concentration was determined using BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, USA). NF-κB (p65) DNA binding activity was determined by NF-κB (p65) Transcription Factor Assay Kit (Cayman Chem, Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using 20 μg of nuclear extract in duplicates. After overnight incubation, the optical density (OD) for each well was read with a microplate reader set to 450 nm immediately after adding the stop solution, then average OD for each group was plotted.

RNA-sequencing

Total RNA was purified from mouse tissues using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were determined using the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was assessed by computing RNA integrity numbers (RINs) on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA (approximately 800 ng) was ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depleted using the Low Input RiboMinus™ Eukaryote System v2 (Thermofisher) and whole-transcriptome libraries were generated using the Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 (Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quality and concentrations of libraries were measured using the Agilent DNA 1000 assay and the 2100 Bioanalyzer. Template reactions were prepared on the Ion Chef Instrument using the Ion PI Hi-Q Chef kit (Thermofisher) and loaded onto Ion PI Chips v3 (Thermofisher) for sequencing on an Ion Proton sequencer according to the manufacturer’s protocol. On an average, approximately 42 million reads were sequenced per sample.

RNA-Seq and differential gene expression analyses

Raw data analysis was performed as described previously64 by alignment (mm10) of reads using both the STAR and Bowtie2 2.1.0 algorithms, combining aligned reads from both, and quantification of transcripts using a modified version of the expectation–maximization (E/M) algorithm. Resultant reads per kilobase per million (RPKM) values were first processed by adding a pseudocount to all values with RPKM <1.0 followed by log (base 2) transformation and quantile normalization. To identify transcripts significantly modulated following Stat3 knockout and differently expressed among female and male mice, a mixed-effects model with terms for Stat3 genotype (LR/Stat3Δ/Δ versus CC-LR) and sex (female versus male) as well as interaction between the two factors (P < 0.01; n = 339 transcripts, Supplementary Data 1). All analyses and clustering were performed in the R language environment. Functional pathways analysis, including gene set enrichment and gene-gene network analysis, of differentially expressed transcripts was performed using Ingenuity Pathways Analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. The statistical significance between two groups was calculated by a two-tailed t-test or analysis of variance with adjustment for multiple comparisons as applied. Graphpad Prism 7 software was used for each type of analysis. Differences were considered significant for P < 0.05.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (466.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 1 (299.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 2 (28.6KB, xlsx)
41467_2018_7042_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (14.2KB, xlsx)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Peer Review File (167.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a research scholar grant from the American Cancer Society (RSG-11-115-01-CNE), lung cancer discovery award from American Lung Association (LCD-503769), and grants from Lung Cancer Priority Program, plus Research Development Award, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center (all to S.J.M.), and grants from Center for Inflammation and Cancer, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center (to S.J.M. and S.S.W.) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant R01CA205608 (to H.K.). H.T.V and C.G.C. were partly supported by CPRIT-CURE summer training program (CO-PI S.S.W.), MD Anderson Cancer Center. S.D. was partly supported by the China Scholarship Council.

Author contributions

S.J.M. conceived the study. H.K. and S.J.M. co-supervised the study and are co-senior corresponding authors. M.S.C., M.H., H.T.V., E.B., A.M.C., C.L.M., C.G.C., H.Z., S.D., H.L., L.P.S. and S.J.M. performed the experiments. S.E.E., J.W., I.I.W., S.F. and S.S.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.S.C., M.H., C.B., L.D., L.P.S., H.K. and S.J.M. analyzed the data; M.S.C., C.B., I.I.W., L.P.S. and S.S.W. reviewed the paper. M.S.C., M.H., H.K. and S.J.M. wrote the paper.

Data availability

Raw and normalized RNA-Seq data were deposited in the gene expression omnibus (GEO) under series GSE109000 (samples GSM2927851GSM2927862). The authors also declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Mauricio S. Caetano, Maya Hassane, Humam Kadara, Seyed Javad Moghaddam.

Contributor Information

Humam Kadara, Email: hk94@aub.edu.lb.

Seyed Javad Moghaddam, Email: smoghadd@mdanderson.org.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-07042-y.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goldstraw P, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:1727–1740. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:1367–1380. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0802714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;511:543–550. doi: 10.1038/nature13385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cully M. Cancer: closing the door on KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:747. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ryan Bríd M., Pine Sharon R., Chaturvedi Anil K., Caporaso Neil, Harris Curtis C. A Combined Prognostic Serum Interleukin-8 and Interleukin-6 Classifier for Stage 1 Lung Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2014;9(10):1494–1503. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barrera L, et al. Cytokine profile determined by data-mining analysis set into clusters of non-small-cell lung cancer patients according to prognosis. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:428–435. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brooks G. D., McLeod L., Alhayyani S., Miller A., Russell P. A., Ferlin W., Rose-John S., Ruwanpura S., Jenkins B. J. IL6 Trans-signaling Promotes KRAS-Driven Lung Carcinogenesis. Cancer Research. 2016;76(4):866–876. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haura EB, Livingston S, Coppola D. Autocrine interleukin-6/interleukin-6 receptor stimulation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer. 2006;7:273–275. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2006.n.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bremnes RM, et al. The role of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and chronic inflammation at the tumor site on cancer development, progression, and prognosis: emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011;6:824–833. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182037b76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Coussens LM, Zitvogel L, Palucka AK. Neutralizing tumor-promoting chronic inflammation: a magic bullet? Science. 2013;339:286–291. doi: 10.1126/science.1232227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taniguchi K, Karin M. IL-6 and related cytokines as the critical lynchpins between inflammation and cancer. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26:54–74. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grivennikov SI, Karin M. Inflammatory cytokines in cancer: tumour necrosis factor and interleukin 6 take the stage. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011;70(Suppl 1):i104–i108. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.140145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Caetano M. S., Zhang H., Cumpian A. M., Gong L., Unver N., Ostrin E. J., Daliri S., Chang S. H., Ochoa C. E., Hanash S., Behrens C., Wistuba I. I., Sternberg C., Kadara H., Ferreira C. G., Watowich S. S., Moghaddam S. J. IL6 Blockade Reprograms the Lung Tumor Microenvironment to Limit the Development and Progression of K-ras-Mutant Lung Cancer. Cancer Research. 2016;76(11):3189–3199. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grivennikov S, et al. IL-6 and Stat3 are required for survival of intestinal epithelial cells and development of colitis-associated cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:798–809. doi: 10.1038/nrc2734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kortylewski M, Yu H. Role of Stat3 in suppressing anti-tumor immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008;20:228–233. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moghaddam SJ, et al. Promotion of lung carcinogenesis by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-like airway inflammation in a K-ras-induced mouse model. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009;40:443–453. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0198OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Egleston BL, Meireles SI, Flieder DB, Clapper ML. Population-based trends in lung cancer incidence in women. Semin. Oncol. 2009;36:506–515. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.North CM, Christiani DC. Women and lung cancer: what is new? Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013;25:87–94. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Geng Y, et al. Prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;37:1560–1571. doi: 10.1159/000438523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zeng DQ, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for clinical therapeutic research in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:13765–13781. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feng W, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with completely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:7227–7240. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Germain C, et al. Presence of B cells in tertiary lymphoid structures is associated with a protective immunity in patients with lung cancer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;189:832–844. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1611OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chaudhary Belal, Elkord Eyad. Regulatory T Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer Progression: Role and Therapeutic Targeting. Vaccines. 2016;4(3):28. doi: 10.3390/vaccines4030028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kargl J, et al. Neutrophils dominate the immune cell composition in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14381. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akbay EA, et al. Interleukin-17A promotes lung tumor progression through neutrophil attraction to tumor sites and mediating resistance to PD-1 blockade. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017;12:1268–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang SH, et al. T helper 17 cells play a critical pathogenic role in lung cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:5664–5669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319051111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gong L, et al. Promoting effect of neutrophils on lung tumorigenesis is mediated by CXCR2 and neutrophil elastase. Mol. Cancer. 2013;12:154. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Houghton AM, et al. Neutrophil elastase-mediated degradation of IRS-1 accelerates lung tumor growth. Nat. Med. 2010;16:219–223. doi: 10.1038/nm.2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taniguchi, K. & Karin, M. NF-kappaB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 309–324 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Wang DJ, Ratnam NM, Byrd JC, Guttridge DC. NF-kappaB functions in tumor initiation by suppressing the surveillance of both innate and adaptive immune cells. Cell Rep. 2014;9:90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaynagetdinov R, et al. Chronic NF-kappaB activation links COPD and lung cancer through generation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment in the lungs. Oncotarget. 2016;7:5470–5482. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhu Z, et al. Inhibition of KRAS-driven tumorigenicity by interruption of an autocrine cytokine circuit. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:452–465. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Basseres DS, Ebbs A, Levantini E, Baldwin AS. Requirement of the NF-kappaB subunit p65/RelA for K-Ras-induced lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3537–3546. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ihara S, et al. Inhibitory roles of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in antitumor immunity during carcinogen-induced lung tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2990–2999. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-4062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li Y, et al. Activation of the signal transducers and activators of the transcription 3 pathway in alveolar epithelial cells induces inflammation and adenocarcinomas in mouse lung. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8494–8503. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yu H, Kortylewski M, Pardoll D. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: role of STAT3 in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1038/nri1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou J, et al. Differential roles of STAT3 in the initiation and growth of lung cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:3804–3814. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Grabner B, et al. Disruption of STAT3 signalling promotes KRAS-induced lung tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6285. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Crncec I, et al. STAT1 is a sex-specific tumor suppressor in colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2018;12:514–528. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schwartz AG, et al. Nuclear estrogen receptor beta in lung cancer: expression and survival differences by sex. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:7280–7287. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Skov BG, Fischer BM, Pappot H. Oestrogen receptor beta over expression in males with non-small cell lung cancer is associated with better survival. Lung Cancer. 2008;59:88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nikolos F, Thomas C, Rajapaksa G, Bado I, Gustafsson JA. ERbeta regulates NSCLC phenotypes by controlling oncogenic RAS signaling. Mol. Cancer Res. 2014;12:843–854. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ben Khedher S, et al. Menstrual and reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: a pooled analysis from the international lung cancer consortium. Int. J. Cancer. 2017;141:309–323. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schwartz AG, et al. Hormone use, reproductive history, and risk of lung cancer: the women’s health initiative studies. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015;10:1004–1013. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chlebowski RT, et al. Oestrogen plus progestin and lung cancer in postmenopausal women (Women’s Health Initiative trial): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1243–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61526-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ganti AK, Sahmoun AE, Panwalkar AW, Tendulkar KK, Potti A. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with decreased survival in women with lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:59–63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.9827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Slatore CG, Chien JW, Au DH, Satia JA, White E. Lung cancer and hormone replacement therapy: association in the vitamins and lifestyle study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:1540–1546. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Siegfried JM. Women and lung cancer: does oestrogen play a role? Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:506–513. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00457-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Skjefstad K, et al. Prognostic relevance of estrogen receptor alpha, beta and aromatase expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Steroids. 2016;113:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stabile LP, et al. Combined analysis of estrogen receptor beta-1 and progesterone receptor expression identifies lung cancer patients with poor outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:154–164. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wu CT, Chang YL, Shih JY, Lee YC. The significance of estrogen receptor beta in 301 surgically treated non-small cell lung cancers. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005;130:979–986. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hammoud Z, Tan B, Badve S, Bigsby RM. Estrogen promotes tumor progression in a genetically defined mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2008;15:475–483. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Peng J, et al. Estrogen metabolism within the lung and its modulation by tobacco smoke. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:909–915. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Peng J, et al. Estrogen metabolism in the human lung: impact of tumorigenesis, smoke, sex and race/ethnicity. Oncotarget. 2017;8:106778–106789. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:626–638. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu H, Liu K, Bodenner DL. Estrogen receptor inhibits interleukin-6 gene expression by disruption of nuclear factor kappaB transactivation. Cytokine. 2005;31:251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sano S, et al. Keratinocyte-specific ablation of Stat3 exhibits impaired skin remodeling, but does not affect skin morphogenesis. EMBO J. 1999;18:4657–4668. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.17.4657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cardnell RJ, et al. An integrated molecular analysis of lung adenocarcinomas identifies potential therapeutic targets among TTF1-negative tumors, including DNA repair proteins and Nrf2. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:3480–3491. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nikitin AY, et al. Classification of proliferative pulmonary lesions of the mouse: recommendations of the mouse models of human cancers consortium. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2307–2316. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kantrowitz Jacob, Sinjab Ansam, Xu Li, McDowell Tina L., Sivakumar Smruthy, Lang Wenhua, Nunomura-Nakamura Sayuri, Fukuoka Junya, Nemer Georges, Darwiche Nadine, Chami Hassan, Tfayli Arafat, Wistuba Ignacio I., Scheet Paul, Fujimoto Junya, Spira Avrum E., Kadara Humam. Genome-Wide Gene Expression Changes in the Normal-Appearing Airway during the Evolution of Smoking-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prevention Research. 2018;11(4):237–248. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (466.6KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 1 (299.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 2 (28.6KB, xlsx)
41467_2018_7042_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (14.2KB, xlsx)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Peer Review File (167.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Raw and normalized RNA-Seq data were deposited in the gene expression omnibus (GEO) under series GSE109000 (samples GSM2927851GSM2927862). The authors also declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES