Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec;183:757–768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.053

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Left panel: location of ROIs used in the present study. Middle panel: Estimated effective connectivity (from columns to rows) at the group level. Diagonal elements reflect self-inhibition parameterised in log-scale (relative to the prior mean of −0.5 Hz). A posterior probability criterion of 90% was used (ns depicts not significant, i.e., posterior probability below 90%). Right panel: estimated between-subject variability for each connection (PEB.Ce). It is evident that the left and right IPC showed the greatest between-subject variability in self-inhibition (log-scale) and extrinsic connectivity (hertz).