Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2018 Oct 31;6:e5873. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5873

Heterologous expression of a Glyoxalase I gene from sugarcane confers tolerance to several environmental stresses in bacteria

Qibin Wu 1, Shiwu Gao 1, Yong-Bao Pan 2, Yachun Su 1, Michael P Grisham 2, Jinlong Guo 1, Liping Xu 1,, Youxiong Que 1,
Editor: Renate Scheibe
PMCID: PMC6215438  PMID: 30402355

Abstract

Glyoxalase I belongs to the glyoxalase system that detoxifies methylglyoxal (MG), a cytotoxic by-product produced mainly from triose phosphates. The concentration of MG increases rapidly under stress conditions. In this study, a novel glyoxalase I gene, designated as SoGloI was identified from sugarcane. SoGloI had a size of 1,091 bp with one open reading frame (ORF) of 885 bp encoding a protein of 294 amino acids. SoGloI was predicted as a Ni2+-dependent GLOI protein with two typical glyoxalase domains at positions 28–149 and 159–283, respectively. SoGloI was cloned into an expression plasmid vector, and the Trx-His-S-tag SoGloI protein produced in Escherichia coli was about 51 kDa. The recombinant E. coli cells expressing SoGloI compared to the control grew faster and tolerated higher concentrations of NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, or ZnSO4. SoGloI ubiquitously expressed in various sugarcane tissues. The expression was up-regulated under the treatments of NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, ZnSO4 and abscisic acid (ABA), or under simulated biotic stress conditions upon exposure to salicylic acid (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA). SoGloI activity steadily increased when sugarcane was subjected to NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, or ZnSO4 treatments. Sub-cellular observations indicated that the SoGloI protein was located in both cytosol and nucleus. These results suggest that the SoGloI gene may play an important role in sugarcane’s response to various biotic and abiotic stresses.

Keywords: Functional validation, SoGloI, Expression analysis, Stress tolerance, Sugarcane

Introduction

Ubiquitously occurring in nature, the glyoxalase pathway involves a two-step catalytic reaction. In the first step, glyoxalase I (GLOI, lactoylglutathione lyase; EC 4.4.1.5) catalyzes the isomerization of hemithioacetal formed spontaneously between methylglyoxal (MG) and reduces glutathione (GSH) to S-D-lactoylglutathione (S-LG) (Thornalley, 1993). In the second step, S-LG is hydrolyzed by glyoxalase II (GLOII, hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase; EC 3.1.2.6) to produce GSH and D-lactate (Yadav et al., 2005a; Yadav et al., 2005b). Under normal physiological conditions, MG is produced primarily through glycolysis at the triose-phosphate step (Phillips & Thornalley, 1993), and to a much lesser extent, through catabolism of amino acids (threonine and glycine) and acetone (Yadav et al., 2005a; Yadav et al., 2005b; Yadav et al., 2007). Under abiotic stresses, however, the concentration of MG in plants can significantly increase by 2–6 folds (Yadav et al., 2005a). The high-level accumulation of MG is toxic to cells, as it can react with DNA to form modified guanylate residues (Papoulis, Al-Abed & Bucala, 1995). MG also can react with proteins to form glycosylamine derivatives of arginine, lysine and hemithioacetal with cysteine residues (Lo et al., 1994). Apart from the direct effect of MG, its intermediate compound S-LG, a substrate for glyoxalase II, is also cytotoxic at higher concentrations by inhibiting DNA synthesis (Thornalley, 1996). Therefore, glutathione-based detoxification of harmful metabolites is one of the main roles of both glyoxalase enzymes (Thornalley, 1990).

The glyoxalase I enzyme is broadly categorized into Zn2+-or Ni2+-dependent class of metal activation. Previous studies have been showed that the Zn2+-dependent GLOI enzymes are thought to be of eukaryotic origin (Frickel et al., 2001; Ridderström & Mannervik, 1996), while Ni2+-dependent GLOI enzymes are thought to be of prokaryotic origin (Sukdeo et al., 2004). The coexistence of both Zn2+-dependent and Ni2+-dependent GLOI enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Sukdeo & Honek, 2007) and the characterization of a Ni2+-dependent GLOI enzyme from rice (Mustafiz et al., 2014) have led to the discouragement of the view that Zn2+-dependent GLOI belongs to eukaryotes and Ni2+-dependent GLOI exists only in prokaryotes (Jain et al., 2016). In plants, the metal specificity of each member of the GLOI family is an important determinant of its catalytic efficiency (Kaur et al., 2017; Mustafiz et al., 2014).

The glyoxalase system has been widely studied in animals and microbes (Price & Knight, 2009; Thornalley, 2003). Some studies have suggested that the glyoxalase system is associated with clinical disorders, such as cancer and diabetes (Price & Knight, 2009; Thornalley, 2003). To date, GLOI has been cloned and characterized from several plant species, including Oryza sativa (Kaur et al., 2017; Mustafiz et al., 2014; Usui et al., 2001; Zeng et al., 2016), Glycine max (Skipsey et al., 2000), Zea mays (Chen et al., 2004), Triticum aestivum (Lin et al., 2010), Triticum medicata (Johansen, Svendsen & Rasmussen, 2000), Brassica juncea (Veena, Reddy & Sopory, 1999), Solanum lycopersicum (Espartero, Sanchez-Aguayo & Pardo, 1995), Allium cepa (Hossain & Fujita, 2009), and Beta vulgaris M14 (Wu et al., 2013a). Studies have shown that GLOI activity is up-regulated in response to light and phytohormones (Chakravarty & Sopory, 1988; Deswal & Sopory, 1999; Sethi, Basu & Guha-Mukherjee, 1988). Moreover, enzyme activity and transcription of GLOI are up-regulated in response to abiotic and biotic stresses, such as NaCl, heavy metals, mannitol, MG, abscisic acid or pathogen attack (Espartero, Sanchez-Aguayo & Pardo, 1995; Ghosh & Islam, 2016; Jain et al., 2016; Kaur et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2010; Mustafiz et al., 2011; Mustafiz et al., 2014; Singla-Pareek, Reddy & Sopory, 2003; Singla-Pareek et al., 2006; Veena, Reddy & Sopory, 1999). Other GLOI genes such as Gly I, GLX1, Bv M14-glyoxalase I, TaGly I, OsGLYI- 11.2, OsGly I, and OsGlyI-8 isolated from B. juncea (Veena, Reddy & Sopory, 1999), S. lycopersicum (Espartero, Sanchez-Aguayo & Pardo, 1995), B. vulgaris M14 (Wu et al., 2013a), T. aestivum (Lin et al., 2010), and rice (Kaur et al., 2017; Mustafiz et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2016) respectively, have been associated with significant tolerance to salt stress. Singla-Pareek et al. (2006) have shown that Gly I from B. Juncea enhances the tolerance to heavy metals, such as zinc, cadmium or lead. Lin et al. (2010) also have shown that TaGly I was up-regulated under ZnCl2treatment. Mustafiz et al. (2011) reported a high level of stress inducibility of Ni2+-dependent GlxI encoding AtGLYI3 and AtGLYI6 in response to salt, drought, wounding, cold and heat treatments in both Arabidopsis thaliana roots and shoots, whereas Zn2+-dependent GlxI encoding AtGLYI2 was found to be heat inducible. Transgenic tobacco plants over-expressing GlyI were highly tolerant to MG, salt, or zinc and were able to grow, flower, and produce viable seeds (Singla-Pareek, Reddy & Sopory, 2003; Singla-Pareek et al., 2006; Veena, Reddy & Sopory, 1999). Zeng et al. (2016) reported that OsGly I was markedly up-regulated in response to NaCl, ZnCl2 and mannitol in rice seedlings. Compared to the wild-type plants, the OsGly I-overexpression transgenic rice lines showed increased glyoxalase enzyme activity, decreased MG level, improved tolerance to NaCl, ZnCl2 and mannitol, and produced higher rates of seed setting and higher yields. Another Ni2+-dependent GlxI gene, OsGLYI-11.2, was found to be highly stress inducible amongst the rice glyoxalase family (Mustafiz et al., 2014). Similarly, Ni2+-dependent GlxI genes from Arabidopsis were found to be more responsive to various stress treatments compared to Zn2+-dependent GlxI genes (Mustafiz et al., 2011). All these findings suggest that the GLOI genes may play an important role in response to stresses.

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is a cash crop mainly used for sugar, biofuel and other food industries such as industrial alcohol in tropical and subtropical regions. It is one of the world’s largest crops. According to the FAO, sugarcane was cultivated in 101 countries on about 26.1 million hectares of land in 2012 (Que et al., 2014). However, the yields of sugarcane are often influenced by many diseases and various environmental stresses, such as smut, rust, ratoon stunting disease (RSD), salt, heavy metal and drought. Sugarcane is reportedly susceptible to salt and shows toxicity symptoms, low sprout emergence, nutritional imbalance, and overall biomass reduction (Akhtar, Wahid & Rasul, 2003; Plaut, Meinzer & Federman, 2000; Wahid, Rao & Rasul, 1997). Though sugarcane plants can overcome a short period of water deficit during the late, sucrose accumulating growth stage, an extended period of drought can cause a significant loss in cane and sugar yields (Begcy et al., 2012). RSD causes significant yield losses, 12%–37% under normal conditions and up to 60% under drought conditions. Moreover, it may also lead to variety deterioration (Bailey & Bechet, 1997; James, 1996; Que et al., 2008). Sugarcane smut also causes serious losses in cane and sugar yields (Hoy et al., 1986; Padmanaban, Alexander & Shanmugan, 1998; Que et al., 2012).

In our previous study, we constructed a sugarcane cDNA library from Sporisorium scitamineum-infected buds (Wu et al., 2013b). An expressed sequence tag of 613 bp (GenBank Accession Number: CA140600.1) had a high similarity to the GLOI gene of Zea mays (GenBank Accession Number: EU966885.1) (Wu et al., 2013b). To study stress response of GLOI in sugarcane, we cloned the entire sugarcane Glyoxalase I gene, designated as SoGloI. We determined the sub-cellular location of the SoGloI’s protein using tobacco protoplasts and investigated growth patterns of Escherichia coli Rosetta cells producing the SoGloI recombinant protein in response to salt and heavy metal ion stresses. We also assessed SoGloI expression and glyoxalase I enzyme in sugarcane in response to simulated biotic and abiotic stresses. The results provided valuable information for the improvement of stress resistance in sugarcane.

Materials & Methods

Plant material

Sugarcane genotype YCE 05-179 was used in this study. Plants were maintained in a genetic nursery at the Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. In addition, tissue culture-derived young, healthy plantlets of YCE 05-179 were also involved in the study.

Cloning of SoGloI gene

A BLAST search of the sugarcane database (taxid: 286192; taxid: 4547; taxid: 128810; taxid: 62335) of GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was conducted with the sugarcane EST, CA140600.1 (Wu et al., 2013b). Several highly homologous sugarcane ESTs were obtained and aligned. A 1,446 bp cDNA of sugarcane Glo I gene, designated as SoGloI, was assembled using the CAP3 Sequence Assembly Program (http://doua.prabi.fr/software/cap3). SoGloI cDNA sequence was amplified in a 25 µL reaction mixture on ABI Veriti96 PCR with primers G-F and G-R (Table 1) under a thermal cycling program: 94 °C, 4 min; 35 cycles of (94 °C, 1 min; 54 °C, 1 min; 72 °C, 1.5 min); and 72 °C, 10 min. Reaction mixture contained 2.5 µL 10 × PCR buffer (plus Mg2+), 2.5 µL dNTPs (2.5 mM), 1.0 µL first-strand cDNA, 1.0 µL each of forward and reverse primers (10 µM) and 0.125 µL Ex-Taq enzyme (5 U µL−1) (Takara, Shanghai, China). Amplified SoGloI cDNA product was separated through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, gel purified using Omega Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, Shanghai, China), and cloned into the PMD 18-T vector (Takara, Shanghai, China). Putative recombinants were confirmed by PCR, of which six were sequenced (Shenggong Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

Table 1. Primers used in the present study.

Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Application
G-F AGCCAGAAGAAAGGGAGC RT-PCR
G-R GTTTCCGCCTTGATGAAC
G-32aF CGGAATTCATGGCAACTGGTAGTGAAG Prokaryotic expression vector construction
G-32aR CCCTCGAGTCAGTGAAGTTCCCTGAG
G-QF TGGACCGCACAATCAAATACTACAC RT-qPCR
G-QR GTATGACATTGGAACGGGCTTTG
25S-QF GCAGCCAAGCGTTCATAGC
25S-QR CCTATTGGTGGGTGAACAATCC
GAPDH-QF CACGGCCACTGGAAGCA
GAPDH-QR TCCTCAGGGTTCCTGATGCC
PCX-GFP-F ATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG Fusion PCR primers for sub-cellular localization
GLO-LAP1-R ACTACCAGTTGCCATCTTGTACAGC
GLO-LAP2-F GCTGTACAAGATGGCAACTGGTAGT
GLO-R TCAGTGAAGTTCCCTGAGGAAGTCG

Bioinformatics analysis

The ORF of the full-length SoGloI was predicted using the ORF Finder program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). Molecular weight and isoelectric point was calculated using Compute pI/Mw tool (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/pi_tool.html). Protein domain was predicted using the SMART Program (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). Protein hydrophilicity was analyzed by Protscale Program (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protscale.html). Prediction of signal peptides and analysis of trans-membrane helix domain were conducted using the SignalP and TMHMM-2.0 Programs (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/). A multiple protein-sequence alignment was carried out using the DNAMAN® Program (Guo et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2010; Su et al., 2013).

Expression of SoGloI in field-grown sugarcane plants

Five tissue samples, white young roots, leaf (+1), leaf sheath (+1), buds (6th-8th from the base), and internodes (6th and 7th from the base) were collected from 7- to 8-month-old plants in the field nursery. All samples except buds were cut into small pieces, wrapped up within tinfoil, and immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen samples were stored in a −80 °C freezer until RNA extraction. Total RNA samples were isolated from the frozen buds using the TRIzol® kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were dissolved in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated H2O. RNA concentration was quantified by measuring absorbance at OD260 and OD280 using Synergy H1 Microplate Reader Multi-Mode (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA). RNA quality was also assessed by 1.0% denaturing agarose gel electrophoreses.

First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg RNA in 20 µL reaction mixture by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using the Prime-Script® 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Shanghai, China) on ABI Veriti96 PCR (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). For real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), a total of 1 µg RNA in 20 µL reaction mixtures was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis using the Prime-Script® RT Reagent Perfect Real Time Kit (Takara, China) on ABI Veriti96 PCR. Phosphoglyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (CA254672) gene was used as the internal control. The primers of GAPDH-QF/GAPDH-QR were listed in Table 1 (Iskandar et al., 2004; Que et al., 2009a; Que et al., 2009b).

SoGloI expression in greenhouse-grown sugarcane plantlets under different stress treatments

In the greenhouse, tissue culture-derived 4-month old healthy plantlets were rinsed with agar medium and transplanted into every other column of 46 mL-wells in two 96-well (8 × 12) plastic trays, containing only distilled water. The water was changed every morning. After 10 days, the plantlets were transplanted to 100-mL flat-bottomed glass tubes and subjected to seven different stress treatments in three replicates. Three plantlets of each treatment was treated with the following solutions: 100 µM methyl jasmonate (MeJA, dissolved with 0.1% (v/v) ethanol and 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20); 5.0 mM salicylic acid (SA, dissolved with 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20); 100 µM abscisic acid (ABA) for 6, 12, and 24 h (Li et al., 2009; Su et al., 2013); 250 mM NaCl; 500 µM CdCl2; 100 µM CuCl2; or 100 µM ZnSO4 for 12, 24 and 48 h (Damaj et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2012; Que et al., 2009a; Que et al., 2009b), respectively. Plantlets grown in distilled water were used as the control.

SoGloI expression in response to MeJA, SA, ABA (0, 6, 12, 24 hour-post-treatment or hpt) and NaCl, CdCl2, CuCl2, ZnSO4 (0, 12, 24, 48 hpt) was analyzed by RT-qPCR on a 7500 RT-qPCR system (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA). 25S rRNA (BQ536525) gene was chosen as internal control and. The primers of 25S-QF/25S-QR were listed in Table 1. The SoGloI-specific primer pair of G-QF/G-QR was designed by Primer Premier 5.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, CA) (Table 1). RT-qPCR was carried out with FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX) (Roche, Shanghai, China) in a 25 µL volume containing 12.5 µL FastStart Universal SYBR Green PCR Master (ROX), 0.5 µM of each primer and 1.0 µL template (100 × diluted cDNA). RT-qPCR with sterile dH2O as template was the control. The RT-qPCR thermal cycle program included 2 min at 50 °C; 10 min at 95 °C; and 40 cycles of (15 s at 94 °C and 1 min at 60 °C). The reactions were repeated three times for each sample. The 2−ddCt method was used to calculate relative gene expression levels (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001).

Expression of pET32a-SoGloI in E. coli Rosetta Cells (DE3)

A SoGloI gene fragment was amplified from the cDNA clone with primers G-32aF/G-32aR (Table 1). The SoGloI PCR fragment was digested with EcoR I and Xho I (NEB, USA) and subsequently sub-cloned into the EcoR I–Xho I sites of pET32a (+) (Guo et al., 2012) to produce pET32a-SoGloI. After sequence verification, the pET32a-SoGloI was transformed into Rosetta Cells (DE3) (Tiangen BioTech Co. Ltd., Sichuan, China). Expression of pET32a-SoGloI was induced in 1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 8 h at 37 °C and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) at 0, 2, 4, and 8 h. Non-transformed (blank) and the vector pET32a-transformed Rosetta cells (control) were used as the controls.

Spot assays were performed to assess the response of pET32a-SoGloI transformed Ecoli cells to NaCl, CdCl2, CuCl2 or ZnSO4 treatments. When the E. coli culture mixture reached OD600 = 0.6, 1 mM IPTG was added into the LB medium and the culture mixture was incubated for 12 h at 28 °C. Then the cultures were first diluted to 0.6 (OD600), and further diluted to two levels (10−3 and 10−4) (Guo et al., 2012). Thereafter, 10 µL each of the diluted cultures was spotted on LB plates containing 170 µg mL−1 chloramphenicol and 80 µg mL−1 ampicillin, along with each test chemical. The concentrations of the chemicals used were NaCl at 250, 500 and 750 mM, CdCl2 at 250, 500 and 750 µM, CuCl2 at 250, 500 and 750 µM, and ZnSO4 at 250, 500 and 750 µM, respectively (Guo et al., 2012; Su et al., 2013). All plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C.

Assay of sugarcane glyoxalase I enzyme activity

Entire flash-frozen 4-month old plantlets (100 mg wet weight) were pulverized in liquid N2 in a mortar. Protein was extracted with an extraction buffer containing 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (PPB, pH 7.5), 50% (v/v) glycerol, 16 mM MgSO4, 0.2 mM Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 0.2% (v/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP40). The extract was centrifuged twice at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C for 30 min to obtain the crude protein extract from the supernatant (Zeng et al., 2016). The supernatant was used as the cytosolic extract for the assessment of glyoxalase activity, and protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. SoGloI activity assay was carried out following Hossain et al. (2009) and Hasanuzzaman, Hossain & Fujita (2011). Briefly, the assay mixture contained 100 mM K-phosphate buffer (PPB, pH 7.0), 15 mM magnesium sulfate, 1.7 mM GSH, and 3.5 mM MG in a final volume of 0.8 mL. Thioester formation was measured by the increase in absorbance at 240 nm for 1 min. The enzyme activity was calculated using an extinction coefficient (ε) of 3.37 mM−1 cm−1.

Sub-cellular localization

The SoGloI gene was sub-cloned into the Xcm I/BamH I restriction sites of pCXSN to construct a fusion protein expression vector of 35S::SoGloI::GFP. The GFP-containing pCXSN vector was a gift of Songbiao Chen, Institute of Biotechnology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The pCXSN-SoGloI recombinant plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells, strain GV 3101 (Chen et al., 2006). The transgenic GV 3101 cells were inoculated into LB medium containing kanamycin (50 µg mL−1) and rifampicin (34 µg mL−1). The culture was incubated overnight at 28 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. The culture was then centrifuged at 5,000× g to harvest the Agrobacterium cells followed by, re-suspension in 10 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM fatty acid methyl ester sulfonate (MES). The concentration of the bacterial suspension was measured and adjusted to OD600 = 0.6 with Murashige and Skoog (MS) liquid medium supplemented with 200 mM acetosyringone. The resulting culture was incubated at 28 °C for 3 h (Yang et al., 2014). Then, 1 mL of the bacterial culture was infiltrated into 4-week old tobacco leaves with disposable syringes. The injection sites were marked. Injected plants were incubated under a 12 h-light/12 h-dark cycle at 28 °C for three days (Su et al., 2013). Then, the protoplasts were isolated from well-expanded leaves following the rice protoplast isolation protocol of Chen et al. (2006). Briefly, the leaves were cut into 1-mm strips and placed in a dish containing 12 mL of K3 medium (3 mM MES, 7 mM CaCl2, 0.35 M mannitol, 0.7 mM NaH2PO4, 0.35 M sorbitol, 20 mM KCl, pH 5.6) supplemented with 0.4 M sucrose, 1.5% cellulase R-10 (Yakult Honsha, Japan) and 0.3% macerozyme R-10 (Yakult). The leaf tissue was vacuum-infiltrated for 30 min at 20 mm Hg and digested at room temperature with gentle shaking for 4 h to produce protoplasts. Then, the K3 medium was replaced with 12 mL of W5 solution (2 mM MES, 154 mM NaCl, 125 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, pH 5.8). The protoplasts were collected by centrifugation at 300× g for 4 min at 4 °C and re-suspended in 1 mL WI solution (4 mM MES, 0.5 M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, pH 5.7). The sub-cellular location of the SoGloI gene was observed using fluorescence microscopy (Ci-L; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Sequence analysis of SoGloI

The full-length of SoGloI (GenBank Accession Number: KC857628) was 1,091 bp with one ORF of 885 bp (Fig. S1). The deduced SoGloI protein had 294 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 32.9 kDa and a pI value of 5.45. Two glyoxalase domains were found, located at 28–149 and 159–283, respectively (Fig. S2). The ProtScale predicted that SoGloI was a hydrophilic protein (Fig. S3). TMHMM Server v.2.0 and SignalP 4.1 Server program predicted that SoGloI was not a trans-membrane protein (Figs. S4, S5).

In order to predict the metal dependency of SoGloI protein, a multiple sequence alignment of SoGloI with other known GloI proteins from Oryza sativa (OsglyI-11.2 and O. Zn-GloI), Arabidopsis thaliana (AtGLYI2, AtGLYI3 and AtGLYI6), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (GloA1, GloA2 and GloA3), Glycine max (G. Zn-GloI and G. Ni-GloI) and Escherichia coli (GlxI) was done using DNAMAN® (Fig. 1). SoGloI shared 87.8%, 69.7%, 57.3%, and 72.0% amino acid sequence identities with OsglyI-11.2, AtGLYI3, AtGLYI6, and G. Ni-GloI, respectively (Fig. 1). Extended amino acid sequences (the letters A, B and C in Fig. 1) of OsglyI-11.2, AtGLYI3, AtGLYI6, GloA1, GloA2, G. Ni-GloI, and GlxI were missing in SoGloI, a characteristic of Ni2+-dependent GloI. Contrarily, these extended amino acid sequences were present in AtGLYI2, GloA3, O. Zn-GloI and G. Zn-GloI, which were Zn2+-dependent GloI.

Figure 1. Multiple protein sequence alignment of SoGloI protein with glyoxalase I proteins from other species.

Figure 1

The species name and accession numbers are as follows: Oryza sativa (OsglyI-11.2 and O. Zn-GloI with Acc. No. Os08g09250 and EEC78918.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (AtGLYI2, AtGLYI3 and AtGLYI6 with Acc. No. NP_172291.1, NP_172648.1, and NP_176896.1 respectively), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (GloA1, GloA2 and GloA3 with Acc. No. AAG06912, AAG04099 and AAG08496 respectively), Glycine max (G. Zn-GloI and G. Ni-GloI with Acc. No. XP_003539194.1 and XP_003528689.1) and Escherichia coli (GlxI with Acc. No. AAC27133). The letters A, B and C represent extended sequences found in Zn2+-dependent GLOI, but absent in Ni2+-dependent GLOI.

Expression of SoGloI in E. coli

Upon IPTG induction, the recombinant SoGloI gene expressed well in Rosetta cells (Fig. 2, Lanes 5–8) to yield SoGloI protein that was 51 kDa in size and carried a Trx-His-S-tag of 18.3 kDa. Moreover, gradually increased amounts of SoGloI protein were also observed when the IPTG induction was extended from 2 h to 8 h.

Figure 2. Heterologous expression of recombinant SoGloI in Escherichia coli Rosetta cells (red arrow).

Figure 2

Lane designation: M, protein size makers with 30, 40, 55, and 70 kDa indicated; 1, blank; 2, control without IPTG induction; 3, control with induction for 8 h; 4, pET 32a-SoGloI without induction; 5 to 8, pET32a-SoGloI with induction for 2, 4, 6 and 8 h, respectively.

In the spot assays, SoGloI-expressing Rosetta cells (Figs. 3A3E, Row a) grew more rapidly on LB agar plates containing NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2 or ZnSO4 than control Rosetta cells (pET 32a) (Figs. 3A3E, Row b). Compared to control cells, SoGloI-expressing cells tolerated salt up to 250 mM (Fig. 3B) as well as heavy metal ions up to 750 µM (Figs. 3C3E). Consistently, SoGloI-expressing cells also grew faster than the control cells in LB liquid media containing 250 mM NaCl, 750 µM CuCl2, 750 µM CdCl2 or 750 µM ZnSO4(Fig. 4). These results may demonstrate that the recombinant SoGloI protein enhanced the growth of Rosetta cells under stress conditions.

Figure 3. Growth of pET32a- SoGloI-expressing (row a) and pET 32a (row b) Escherichia coli Rosetta cells on LB agar plates with various concentrations of salt or heavy metal ions indicated above the figures.

Figure 3

(A) Control; (B) NaCl; (C) CuCl2; (D) CdCl2, and (E) ZnSO4.

Figure 4. Growth assessments of SoGloI overexpressing Escherichia coli Rosetta cells under salt and heavy metal treatments.

Figure 4

(A) under 250 mM NaCl treatment from 0 h to 24 h; (B) under 750 µM CuCl2 treatment from 0 h to 28 h; (C) under 750 µM CdCl2 treatment from 0 h to 26 h; (D) under 750 µM ZnSO4 treatment from 0 h to 28 h. All data were measured every two hours. All data points are mean ± SE (n = 3).

Expression patterns of SoGloI in sugarcane tissues

RT-qPCR was conducted to detect both tissue-specific and stress-related expression of SoGloI. The SoGloI gene was ubiquitously expressed in five tissues of 7- to 8-month old plants collected from the field. The highest level was detected in buds, followed by leaves, roots, leaf sheaths, and internodes (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5. Expression patterns of SoGloI in sugarcane.

Figure 5

(A) SoGloI expression in different sugarcane tissues collected in the field; (B) SoGloI expression in greenhouse-grown sugarcane plantlets under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, and ZnSO4 treatments; (C) SoGloI expression in greenhouse-grown sugarcane plantlets under SA, MeJA, and ABA treatments; (D) glyoxalase I activity under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, and ZnSO4 treatments. Different letters indicate a significant difference at 5% level (p ≤ 0.05). Each value represents the average of three biological repeats ± SE (n = 3).

SoGloI expression patterns in healthy 4-month old plantlets under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, ZnSO4, SA, MeJA, and ABA treatments were shown in Figs. 5B and 5C. Under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, and ZnSO4 treatments, SoGloI expression was up-regulated steadily from 0 to 48 hpt. The peak level of SoGloI expression was about 3.1-, 2.9- 2.8- and 1.9-fold of the level in control, respectively (Fig. 5B). In contrast, under SA and MeJA treatments, SoGloI expression decreased after peaking at 6 hpt. The maximum level of SoGloI expression was detected at 6 hpt, which was about 2.6- and 2.1-fold of the level in control, respectively (Fig. 5C). Similarly, the peak level of SoGloI expression was detected at 12 hpt under ABA treatments, which was 2.4-fold of the level in control (Fig. 5C). Thus, SoGloI gene has been found to provide tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses.

Glyoxalase I activity in sugarcane under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2 or ZnSO4 treatment

As shown in Fig. 5D, under NaCl, CuCl2, CdCl2, and ZnSO4 treatments, the glyoxalase I activity was increased steadily from 0 to 48 hpt. Under a 250 mM NaCl treatment, the glyoxalase I activity was about 1.8-, 2.2-, and 2.3-fold at 12, 24, and 48 hpt comparing to control, respectively. At 48 hpt, the level of glyoxalase I activity reached 0.3230 µmol min−1 mg−1. Under a 750 µM CuCl2 treatment, the level of glyoxalase I activity was about 2.0-, 2.7-, and 3.0-fold of the level in control, with 0.4128 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein produced at 48 hpt. Similarly, under a 750 µM CdCl2 treatment, the glyoxalase I activity was 2.1-, 3.1- and 4.2-fold comparing to control, with a highest activity of 0.5730 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein at 48 hpt. Under 750 µM ZnSO4 treatment, the glyoxalase I activity at 12, 24, and 48 hpt was about 1.3-, 2.6-, and 3.1-fold of the level at 0 hpt, and 0.2883 µmol min−1 mg−1 protein produced at 48 hpt. Thus, glyoxalase I activity was increased in varying degrees under salt and heavy metal ions stress conditions.

Determination of subcellular localization of ScGloI

To further understand the function of SoGloI gene, its subcellular localization was determined. The SoGloI gene was inserted into a plant expression vector pCXSN between the 35S promoter and GFP. The recombinant pCXSN-SoGloI-GFP construct was then introduced into tobacco leaves through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. As shown in Fig. 6, green fluorescence signals were observable in the cytosol and nucleus of both pCXSN-SoGloI-GFP and the pCXSN-GFP transformed tobacco protoplasts.

Figure 6. Determination of subcellular localization of ScGloI in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) protoplasts under a fluorescence microscopy.

Figure 6

(A) bright field vision of pCXSN-GFP; (B) fluorescence vision of pCXSN-GFP; (C) merged vision of A and B; (D) bright field vision of pCXSN-SoGloI-GFP; (E) fluorescence vision of pCXSN-SoGloI-GFP; (F) merged vision of D and E. The emission wavelength is 515 nm and the excitation wavelength is between 470 nm and 490 nm.

Discussion

Glyoxalase I functions to detoxify the potent cytotoxic compound MG (Thornalley, 1993). In response to stress conditions, cells undergo active metabolism to produce more MG through leakages in the glycolysis and TCA cycle (Umea et al., 1994). GlyI, the first enzyme of the glyoxalase system, plays a critical role in controlling MG levels and cytotoxicity (Wu et al., 2013a). The GloI gene has been cloned and characterized from several plant species. However, the glyoxalase I gene was never cloned and characterized in sugarcane. In the present study, a length GloI gene, designated as SoGloI, was isolated from a smut-resistant sugarcane cultivar YCE 05-179.

The GloI enzyme requires Ni2+ or/and Zn2+ for its catalytic activity (Sukdeo et al., 2004). Sukdeo & Honek (2007) reported that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a gamma proteobacteria, encodes both Ni2+ and Zn2+ forms of the enzyme; GloA1, GloA2 (both Ni binding), and GloA3 (Zn binding). Jain et al. (2016) also found three active GLYI enzymes (AtGLYI2, AtGLYI3 and AtGLYI6) belonging to different metal activation classes coexisting in Arabidopsis thaliana. AtGLYI2 was found to be Zn2+-dependent, whereas AtGLYI3 and AtGLYI6 were Ni2+-dependent. Ni2+-dependent GloI is present as a two-domain protein in all eukaryotes. Among the early branching eukaryotes, the group of algae appears to be the first to encode this gene (Kaur et al., 2013). In this study, a sugarcane SoGloI gene was found to encode two glyoxalase domains as well (Fig. S2). Besides, the multiple protein sequence alignment of SoGloI with those from other species indicated that SoGloI was a Ni2+-dependent enzyme (Fig. 1). The result was similar to OsGLYI-11.2 (Mustafiz et al., 2014), who’s expression was substrate inducible. However, unlike other eukaryotic Zn2+-dependent glyoxalases, OsGLYI-11.2 is a Ni2+-dependent monomeric enzyme.

Plant glyoxalase system in different tissues plays an important role at various vegetative and reproductive stages (Mustafiz et al., 2011). GLOI gene is required for cell division and proliferation; a higher enzyme activity has been found in rapidly dividing cells of cell suspensions, seedlings, and root tips (Lin et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2013a). In this study, SoGloI was constitutively expressed in various tissues of sugarcane genotype YCE 05-179, with the highest level in buds, followed by leaves, roots, leaf sheaths, and internodes (Fig. 5A).

To date, only a few reports have shown that GLOI gene is associated with disease resistance in plants. For instance, a maize Glx-I gene enhances the host defense against Aspergillus flavus through the detoxification of MG, a major product of A. flavus (Chen et al., 2004). The expression of wheat TaGly I is up-regulated 2.3-fold upon infection by Fusarium graminearum (Lin et al., 2010). In our previous study, SoGloI expression was up-regulated during infection with S. scitamineum, the pathogen of sugarcane smut (Wu et al., 2013b). In the present study, we used SA and MeJA to simulate biotic stress. Consistently, under SA and MeJA treatments, the SoGloI expression peaked at 6 hpt, when its activity reached 2.6- and 2.1-fold higher than that of the control, respectively (Fig. 5C). These results suggest that SoGloI expression can increase significantly under pathogenic stresses; however, the exact role of SoGloI in pathogenic resistance process needs to be further investigated.

Glyoxalase I genes also have been implicated to enhance plant tolerance to salt stress. The expression of Gly, a glyoxalase I gene of B. juncea, is up-regulated after exposure to a high concentration of salt (Veena, Reddy & Sopory, 1999). The mRNA and polypeptide levels of GLX1, a glyoxalase I gene of tomato, increased by two to three folds in roots, internodes and leaves when the plants were treated with 10 g/L NaCl (Espartero, Sanchez-Aguayo & Pardo, 1995). The expression of two other glyoxalase I genes, Bv M14-glyoxalase I of sugar beet (Wu et al., 2013a) and TaGly I of wheat (Lin et al., 2010), also significantly enhanced hosts’ tolerance to salt stress. In this study, SoGloI-expressing Rosetta cells grown on agar plates tolerated high concentrations of NaCl up to 250 mM (Fig. 3B) and grew faster in LB liquid medium containing 250 mM NaCl (Fig. 4A). SoGloI expression was increased steadily from 0 to 48 hpt in sugarcane under salt stress (Fig. 5B). Under salt stress, glyoxalase I activity also elevated (Fig. 5D). Taken together, the results indicate the expression level of SoGloI can be significantly up-regulated under salt stress; however, more research is needed to reveal the underlying mechanism.

Zinc (Zn2+), a micronutrient, is necessary for plant growth, but an excessive amount of Zn2+ can inhibit plant growth (Sun et al., 2006; Zarcinas et al., 2004). A few studies have demonstrated that plant GloI genes enhance host tolerance to Zn2+. Singla-Pareek et al. (2006) showed that GlyI from B. juncea enhanced host Zn2+ tolerance to toxic levels in the transgenic tobacco. The expression of TaGly I, a glyoxalase I gene of T. aestivum, is induced continuously under 20 mM ZnCl2treatment. Compared to control, the increase in TaGly I expression is nearly 1.5-fold at 24 h (Lin et al., 2010). In the present study, SoGloI-expressing E. coli Rosetta cells were able to tolerate high concentrations of ZnSO4up to 750 µM (Fig. 3E) and also grew faster in LB liquid medium containing 750 µM ZnSO4 (Fig. 4D).

Consistently, under ZnSO4 stress, the SoGloI expression in sugarcane was up-regulated steadily from 0 to 48 hpt, when its level and enzyme activity were 1.9-fold and 3.1-fold higher than that of the control (Figs. 5B, 5D). These results showed that SoGloI gene can enhance tolerance to excessive zinc stress even in a heterologous host system. Over-expression of glyoxalase I has been shown to confer tolerance to other heavy metals, such as cadmium or lead (Singla-Pareek et al., 2006). The level of expression and activity of SoGloI in E. coli (Figs. 3D, 4C) under CdCl2 treatment (Figs. 5B, 5D) also supported this notion about tolerance to cadmium. Our work further showed that SoGloI expression and its enzyme activity were increased significantly under CuCl2 treatment (Figs. 5B, 5D). All these findings suggest that SoGloI may be a good candidate gene for engineering to develop heavy metal resistant sugarcane cultivars.

As is known, sugarcane is a polyploidy and aneuploidy crop (Scortecci et al., 2012), in which low transformation efficiency remains one of the major limiting factors on transgenic sugarcane production (Dal-Bianco et al., 2012; Gómez-Merino, Trejo-Téllez & Sentíes-Herrera, 2014; Scortecci et al., 2012). This has also limited the functional analysis of isolated sugarcane genes; nonetheless, a model plant species (Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana benthamiana or Brachypodium distachyon) with a shorter life cycle and simpler genome can be explored as an alternative host for transforming and assessing the functional properties of isolated sugarcane genes, such as SoGloI.

Conclusions

This is the first report on the cloning and characterization of glyoxalase I (SoGloI) gene in sugarcane. We isolated and characterized SoGloI gene and demonstrated the enzyme activity of glyoxalase I protein. We found that SoGloI expression and SoGloI enzymatic activity were elevated significantly when sugarcane tissues were subject to simulated biotic and abiotic stress conditions, such as high concentrations of salt or heavy metal ions. The findings have opened up a new research avenue for sugarcane to grow in polluted or salty environments via genetic engineering and breeding of SoGloI to enhance host resistance.

Supplemental Information

Figure S1. Nucleotide acid sequences and deduced amino acid sequences of SoGloI obtained by RT-PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-1
Figure S2. Domain architecture analyses of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-2
Figure S3. Hydrophobicity prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-3
Figure S4. Signal peptides prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-4
Figure S5. Trans-membrane helix domain prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-5
Data S1. Raw data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-6

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province, China (2015J06006), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571732 and 31101196) and the Earmarked Fund for the Modern Agriculture Technology of China (CARS-20). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Liping Xu, Email: xlpmail@126.com.

Youxiong Que, Email: queyouxiong@126.com.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Qibin Wu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Shiwu Gao, Yachun Su and Jinlong Guo performed the experiments.

Yong-Bao Pan authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Michael P. Grisham authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Liping Xu and Youxiong Que conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental File.

References

  • Akhtar, Wahid & Rasul (2003).Akhtar S, Wahid A, Rasul E. Emergence, growth and nutrient composition of sugarcane sprouts under NaCl salinity. Biologia Plantarum. 2003;46:113–116. doi: 10.1023/a:1022326604192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bailey & Bechet (1997).Bailey RA, Bechet GR. Further evidence of the effects of ratoon stunting disease on production under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Proceedings of the South African sugar technologists’ association, vol. 71; 1997. pp. 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  • Begcy et al. (2012).Begcy K, Mariano ED, Gentile A, Lembke CG, Zingaretti SM, Souza GM, Menossi M. A novel stress-induced sugarcane gene confers tolerance to drought, salt and oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e44697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bradford (1976).Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chakravarty & Sopory (1988).Chakravarty TN, Sopory SK. Blue light stimulation of cell proliferation and glyoxalase I activity in callus cultures of Amaranthus paniculatus. Plant Science. 1988;132:63–69. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00264-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2006).Chen SB, Tao LZ, Zeng LR, Vega-Sanchez ME, Umemura K, Wang GL. A highly efficient transient protoplast system for analyzing defence gene expression and protein–protein interactions in rice. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2006;7:417–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2004).Chen ZY, Brown RL, Damann KE, Cleveland TE. Identification of a maize kernel stress-related protein and its effect on aflatoxin accumulation. Phytopathology. 2004;94:938–945. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.9.938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dal-Bianco et al. (2012).Dal-Bianco M, Carneiro MS, Hotta CT, Chapola RG, Hoffmann HP, Garcia AAF, Souza GM. Sugarcane improvement: how far can we go? Current Opinion Biotechnology. 2012;23:265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Damaj et al. (2010).Damaj MB, Kumpatla SP, Emani C, Beremand PD, Reddy AS, Rathore KS, Buenrostro-Nava MT, Curtis IS, Thomas TL, Mirkov TE. Sugarcane DIRIGENT and O-methyltransferase promoters confer stem-regulated gene expression in diverse monocots. Planta. 2010;231:1439–1458. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Deswal & Sopory (1999).Deswal R, Sopory SK. Glyoxalase I from Brassica juncea is a calmodulin stimulated protein. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1999;1450:460–467. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4889(99)00047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espartero, Sanchez-Aguayo & Pardo (1995).Espartero J, Sanchez-Aguayo I, Pardo JM. Molecular characterization of glyoxalase I from a higher plant: up-regulation by stress. Plant Molecular Biology. 1995;29:1223–1233. doi: 10.1007/BF00020464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frickel et al. (2001).Frickel EM, Jemth P, Widersten M, Mannervik B. Yeast glyoxalase I is a monomeric enzyme with two active sites. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:1845–1849. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005760200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghosh & Islam (2016).Ghosh A, Islam T. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of glyoxalase gene families in soybean (Glycine max) indicate their development and abiotic stress specific response. BMC Plant Biology. 2016;16:87. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0773-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez-Merino, Trejo-Téllez & Sentíes-Herrera (2014).Gómez-Merino FC, Trejo-Téllez LI, Sentíes-Herrera HE. Biosystems engineering: biofactories for food production in the century XXI. Cham: Springer; 2014. Sugarcane as a novel biofactory: potentialities and challenges; pp. 129–149. [Google Scholar]
  • Guo et al. (2012).Guo JL, Xu LP, Fang JP, Su YC, Fu HY, Que YX, Xu JS. A novel dirigent protein gene with highly stem-specific expression from sugarcane, response to drought, salt and oxidative stresses. Plant Cell Report. 2012;31:1801–1812. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1293-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasanuzzaman, Hossain & Fujita (2011).Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain MA, Fujita M. Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnology Report. 2011;5:353–365. doi: 10.1007/s11816-011-0189-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hossain & Fujita (2009).Hossain MA, Fujita M. Purification of glyoxalase I from onion bulbs and molecular cloning of its cDNA. Bioscience, Biotechnology & Biochemistry. 2009;73:2007–2013. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoy et al. (1986).Hoy JW, Hollier CA, Fontenot DB, Grelen LB. Incidence of sugarcane smut in Louisiana and its effects on yield. Plant Disease. 1986;70:59–60. doi: 10.1094/PD-70-59. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Iskandar et al. (2004).Iskandar HM, Simpson RS, Casu RE, Bonnett GD, Maclean DJ, Manners JM. Comparison of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in sugarcane. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2004;22:325–337. doi: 10.1007/BF02772676. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jain et al. (2016).Jain M, Batth R, Kumari S, Mustafiz A. Arabidopsis thaliana Contains both Ni2+ and Zn2+ dependent glyoxalase I enzymes and ectopic expression of the latter contributes more towards abiotic stress tolerance in E. coli. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0159348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • James (1996).James G. A review of ratoon stunting disease. International Sugar Journal. 1996;98:532–545. [Google Scholar]
  • Johansen, Svendsen & Rasmussen (2000).Johansen KS, Svendsen I, Rasmussen SK. Purification and cloning of the two domains glyoxalase I from wheat bran. Plant Science. 2000;155:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00250-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaur et al. (2017).Kaur C, Tripathi AK, Nutan KK, Sharma S, Ghosh A, Tripathi JK, Pareek A, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. A nuclear-localized rice glyoxalase I enzyme, OsGLYI-8, functions in the detoxification of methylglyoxal in the nucleus. The Plant Journal. 2017;89(3):565–576. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaur et al. (2013).Kaur C, Vishnoi A, Ariyadasa TU, Bhattacharya A, Singla-Pareek SL, Sopory SK. Episodes of horizontal gene-transfer and gene-fusion led to co-existence of different metal-ion specific glyoxalase I. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:3076. doi: 10.1038/srep03076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2009).Li DM, Staehelin C, Wang WT, Peng SL. Molecular cloning and characterization of a chitinase-homologous gene from Mikania micrantha infected by Cuscuta campestris. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2009;28:90–101. doi: 10.1007/s11105-009-0125-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin et al. (2010).Lin FY, Xu JH, Shi JR, Li HW, Lin B. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel glyoxalase I gene TaGly I in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Molecular Biology Reports. 2010;37:729–735. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9578-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2010).Liu B, Xue XD, Cui SP, Zhang XY, Han QM, Zhu L, Liang XF, Huang LL, Chen XM, Kang ZS. Cloning and characterization of a wheat β-1, 3-glucanase gene induced by the stripe rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Molecular Biology Reports. 2010;37:1045–1052. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9823-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Livak & Schmittgen (2001).Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ddCt method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lo et al. (1994).Lo T, Westwood M, McLellan A, Selwood T, Thornalley P. Binding and modification of proteins by methylglyoxal under physiological conditions: a kinetic and mechanistic study with N-acetylarginine, N-acetylcysteine, and N-acetyl-lysine and bovine serum albumin. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1994;269:32299–32305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustafiz et al. (2014).Mustafiz A, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, Kaur C, Ganguly AK, Bhavesh NS, Tripathi JK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. A unique Ni2+ -dependent and methylglyoxal-inducible rice glyoxalase i possess a single active site and functions in abiotic stress response. The Plant Journal. 2014;78:951–963. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mustafiz et al. (2011).Mustafiz A, Singh AK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Genome-wide analysis of rice and Arabidopsis identifies two glyoxalase genes that are highly expressed in abiotic stress. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2011;11:293–305. doi: 10.1007/s10142-010-0203-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Padmanaban, Alexander & Shanmugan (1998).Padmanaban P, Alexander KC, Shanmugan N. Effect of smut on growth and yield parameters of sugarcane. Indian Phytopathology. 1998;41:367–369. [Google Scholar]
  • Papoulis, Al-Abed & Bucala (1995).Papoulis A, Al-Abed Y, Bucala R. Identification of N2-(1-carboxyethyl) guanine (CEG) as a guanine advanced glycosylation end product. Biochemistry. 1995;34:648–655. doi: 10.1021/bi00002a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips & Thornalley (1993).Phillips SA, Thornalley PJ. The formation of methylglyoxal from triose phosphates. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1993;212:101–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Plaut, Meinzer & Federman (2000).Plaut Z, Meinzer FC, Federman E. Leaf development, transpiration and ion uptake and distribution in sugarcane cultivars grown under salinity. Plant and Soil. 2000;218:59–69. doi: 10.1023/a:1014996229436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Price & Knight (2009).Price CL, Knight SC. Methylglyoxal: possible link between hyperglycaemia and immune suppression? Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2009;20:312–317. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Que et al. (2008).Que YX, Xu JS, Xu LP, Gao SJ, Chen RK. PCR detection for Leifsonia xyli subsp. Xyli, pathogen of the sugarcane ratoon stunting disease. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008;23:364–367. [Google Scholar]
  • Que et al. (2012).Que YX, Xu LP, Lin JW, Chen RK, Grisham MP. Molecular variation of Sporisorium scitamineum in Mainland China revealed by RAPD and SRAP markers. Plant Disease. 2012;96:1519–1525. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-11-0663-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Que et al. (2014).Que YX, Xu LP, Wu QB, Liu YF, Ling H, Liu YH, Zhang YY, Guo JL, Su YC, Chen JB, Wang SS, Zhang CG. Genome sequencing of Sporisorium scitamineum provides insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of sugarcane smut. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:996. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Que et al. (2009a).Que YX, Xu LP, Xu JS, Zhang JS, Zhang MQ, Chen RK. Selection of control genes in real-time qPCR analysis of gene expression in sugarcane. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops. 2009a;30:274–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Que et al. (2009b).Que YX, Yang ZX, Xu LP, Chen RK. Isolation and identification of differentially expressed genes in sugarcane infected by Ustilago scitaminea. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2009b;35:452–458. [Google Scholar]
  • Ridderström & Mannervik (1996).Ridderström M, Mannervik B. Optimized heterologous expression of the human zinc enzyme glyoxalase I. Biochemical Journal. 1996;314:463–4677. doi: 10.1042/bj3140463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scortecci et al. (2012).Scortecci KC, Creste S, Calsa TJ, Xavier MA, Landell MGA, Figueira A, Benedito VA. Plant breeding. London: InTech; 2012. Challenges, opportunities and recent advances in sugarcane breeding; pp. 267–296. [Google Scholar]
  • Sethi, Basu & Guha-Mukherjee (1988).Sethi U, Basu A, Guha-Mukherjee S. Control of cell proliferation and differentiation by regulating polyamine biosynthesis in cultures of Brassica and its correlation with glyoxalase activity. Plant Science. 1988;56:167–175. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(88)90031-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Singla-Pareek, Reddy & Sopory (2003).Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:14672–14677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2034667100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Singla-Pareek et al. (2006).Singla-Pareek SL, Yadav SK, Pareek A, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Transgenic tobacco over-expressing glyoxalase pathway enzymes grow and set viable seeds in zinc-spiked soils. Plant Physiology. 2006;140:613–623. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skipsey et al. (2000).Skipsey M, Andrews CJ, Townson JK, Jepson I, Edwards R. Cloning and characterization of glyoxalase I from soybean. Archives of Biochemistry & Biophysics. 2000;374:261–268. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su et al. (2013).Su YC, Xu LP, Xue BT, Wu QB, Guo JL, Wu LG, Que YX. Molecular cloning and characterization of two pathogenesis-related β-1, 3-glucanase genes ScGluA1 and ScGluD1 from sugarcane infected by Sporisorium scitaminea. Plant Cell Reports. 2013;32:1503–1519. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1463-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukdeo et al. (2004).Sukdeo N, Clugston SL, Daub E, Honek JF. Distinct classes of glyoxalase I: metal specificity of the Yersinia pestis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria meningitidis enzymes. Biochemical Journal. 2004;384:111–117. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukdeo & Honek (2007).Sukdeo N, Honek JF. Pseudomonas aeruginosa contains multiple glyoxalase I-encoding genes from both metal activation classes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics. 2007;1774:756–763. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun et al. (2006).Sun YF, Xie ZM, Li J, Xu JM, Chen ZL, Naidu R. Assessment of toxicity of heavy metal contaminated soils by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure. Environmental Geochemistry & Health. 2006;28:73–78. doi: 10.1007/s10653-005-9014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornalley (1990).Thornalley PJ. The glyoxalase system: new developments towards functional characterization of a metabolic pathway fundamental to biological life. Biochemical Journal. 1990;269:1–11. doi: 10.1042/bj2690001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornalley (1993).Thornalley PJ. The glyoxalase system in health and disease. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 1993;14:287–371. doi: 10.1016/0098-2997(93)90002-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornalley (1996).Thornalley PJ. Pharmacology of methylglyoxal: formation, modification of proteins and nucleic acids, and enzymatic detoxification—a role in pathogenesis and antiproliferative chemotherapy. General Pharmacology: The Vascular System. 1996;27:565–573. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(95)02054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thornalley (2003).Thornalley PJ. Protecting the genome: defense against nucleotide glycation and emerging role of glyoxalase I over-expression in multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2003;31:1372–1377. doi: 10.1042/bst0311372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Umea et al. (1994).Umea M, Hara C, Matsubayashi Y, Li HH, Liu Q, Tadokoro F, Aotsuka S, Uchimiya H. Expressed sequence tags from cultured cells of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under stressed conditions: analysis of transcripts of genes engaged in ATP generating pathways. Plant Molecular Biology. 1994;25:469–478. doi: 10.1007/BF00043875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Usui et al. (2001).Usui Y, Nakase M, Hotta H, Urisu A, Aoki N, Kitajima K, Matsuda T. A 33-kDa allergen from rice (Oryza sativa L. Japonica) cDNA cloning, expression, and identification as a novel glyoxalase I. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:11376–11381. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010337200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Veena, Reddy & Sopory (1999).Veena, Reddy VS, Sopory SK. Glyoxalase I from Brassica juncea: molecular cloning, regulation and its over-expression confer tolerance in transgenic tobacco under stress. The Plant Journal. 1999;17:385–395. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wahid, Rao & Rasul (1997).Wahid A, Rao A, Rasul E. Identification of salt tolerance traits in sugarcane lines. Field Crops Research. 1997;54:9–17. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00038-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2013a).Wu C, Ma CQ, Pan Y, Gong SL, Zhao CX, Chen SX, Li HY. Sugar beet M14 glyoxalase I gene can enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses. Journal of Plant Research. 2013a;126:415–425. doi: 10.1007/s10265-012-0532-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2013b).Wu QB, Xu LP, Guo JL, Su YC, Que YX. Transcriptome profile analysis of sugarcane responses to Sporisorium scitaminea infection using Solexa sequencing technology. BioMed Research International. 2013b;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/298920. Article 298920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yadav et al. (2007).Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Kumar M, Pareek A, Saxena M, Sopory SK. Characterization and functional validation of glyoxalase II from rice. Protein Expression & Purification. 2007;51:126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yadav et al. (2005a).Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Ray M, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Methylglyoxal levels in plants under salinity stress are dependent on glyoxalase I and glutathione. Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications. 2005a;337:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yadav et al. (2005b).Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Methylglyoxal detoxification by glyoxalase system: a survival strategy during environmental stresses. Physiology & Molecular Biology of Plants. 2005b;11:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2014).Yang YT, Fu ZW, Su YC, Zhang X, Li GY, Guo JL, Que YX, Xu LP. A cytosolic glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene, ScG6PDH, plays a positive role in response to various abiotic stresses in sugarcane. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:7090. doi: 10.1038/srep07090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zarcinas et al. (2004).Zarcinas BA, Pongsakul P, McLaughlin MJ, Cozens G. Heavy metals in soils and crops in Southeast Asia 2. Thailand. Environmental Geochemistry & Health. 2004;26:359–371. doi: 10.1007/s10653-005-4670-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng et al. (2016).Zeng ZM, Xiong FJ, Yu XH, Gong XP, Luo JT, Jiang YD, Kuang KC, Gao BJ, Niu XL, Liu YS. Overexpression of a glyoxalase gene, OsGly I, improves abiotic stress tolerance and grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2016;109:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Nucleotide acid sequences and deduced amino acid sequences of SoGloI obtained by RT-PCR.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-1
Figure S2. Domain architecture analyses of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-2
Figure S3. Hydrophobicity prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-3
Figure S4. Signal peptides prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-4
Figure S5. Trans-membrane helix domain prediction of SoGloI protein.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-5
Data S1. Raw data.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5873/supp-6

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a Supplemental File.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES