Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2018 Nov 5;20(Suppl 6):vi63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy148.256

CMET-47. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF FITNESS TO DRIVE IN PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES

Cristina Valencia-Sanchez 1, Steven Schild 1, Sujay Vora 2, Jonathan Ashman 2, Thomas Daniels 2, Michele Halyard 2, William Rule 2, Nan Zhang 2, Richard Butterfield 2, Akanksha Sharma 3, Maciej Mrugala 4, Alyx Porter 2
PMCID: PMC6217027

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Brain tumors can result in focal neurological and cognitive deficits which may impair the ability to drive. There are no evidence-based recommendations on driving restrictions for patients with brain metastases. Recommendations vary per practice, with extrapolation based on local driving and epilepsy laws. Occupational Therapy driving assessment (OTDA) may provide insight into limitations for this population.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether clinical neurologic examination is sufficient to predict suitability to drive in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

We assessed the concordance between Neurology assessment of suitability to drive (pass/fail) and OTDA in individuals with brain metastases. 40 subjects were prospectively enrolled. Neurooncology evaluation was performed as standard of care, including an interview and neurological examination. Subjects subsequently underwent OTDA during which a battery of objective measures of visual, cognitive and motor skills related to driving was administered.

RESULTS

Preliminary results from the first 29 patients included are reported. Mean age was 68 years. Lung was the primary location of the tumor in 62% cases. More patients in the group that failed OTDA had bilateral brain metastasis (77.3% vs 42.9%,p=0.0478). The sensitivity of the Neurology assessment to predict driving fitness compared to OTDA was 22.7% and the specificity 71.4%. The 22 patients who failed OTDA were more likely to fail on Vision Coach (81.8%), MOCA (68.2%) and Trail Making (50%) tests.

DISCUSSION

There was poor correlation between the assessment of suitability to drive by Neurology and the outcome of the OTDA in patients with brain metastases. Subtle deficits that may impair the ability to drive safely may not be evident on neurologic examination. The Vision Coach, MOCA and Trail Making tests were the most sensitive tests to predict driver safety. The results raise questions about the choice of assessments in making recommendations about fitness to drive in people with brain metastases.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES