Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2018 Nov 5;20(Suppl 6):vi221. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy148.916

QOLP-30. SURVIVAL, LOCAL CONTROL, AND HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN OLIGOMETASTATIC AND POLYMETASTATIC SPINAL TUMORS: A MULTICENTER, INTERNATIONAL STUDY

Ori Barzilai 1, Anne Versteeg 2, Arjun Sahgal 3, Laurence Rhines 4, Mark Bilsky 5, Daniel Sciubba 6, James Schuster 7, Michael Webber 8, Peter Varga 9, Stefano Boriani 10, Chetan Bettegowda 6, Michael Fehlings 11, Yoshiya Yamada 12, Michelle Clarke 13, Paul Arnold 14, Ziya Gokaslan 15, Charles Fisher 16, Ilya Laufer 5
PMCID: PMC6217516

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oligometastatic disease (5 metastases) is considered an intermediate cancer state of limited metastatic capacity and improved prognosis. Hence, in recent years, treatment of oligometastatic spinal disease has trended towards more definitive, ablative therapies. Little is known about the actual prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease. The focus of this study was to compare oligometastatic spine patients to those with polymetastatic disease (>5 metastases).

METHODS

This is an international, multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data. Data collected included demographics, survival, local control, histology, number and location of spine metastases, epidural spine cord compression (ESCC), the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), systemic disease burden, and treatment details. Health-related quality of life (HrQOL) measures included; numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-3L), short form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) and the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire (SOSGOQ).

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients were included, of which 215 presented with oligometastatic disease and 178 with polymetastatic disease. A significant survival advantage was found for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared to those with polymetastatic disease at time of initial treatment of spinal metastases. This survival advantage was noticeable in both operative and non-operative patients. Local control rates were higher in the oligometastatic group for the spinal level treated. Furthermore, both groups experienced significant improvement in multiple HrQOL measures at 6 months post-treatment with no differences in these outcome measures between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

At time of treatment of spinal metastatic disease, oligometastatic disease offers a significant survival advantage compared to polymetastatic disease, regardless of treatment choice. Local control can be achieved in both groups. HrQOL measures improve in both groups post-treatment, thus demonstrating a palliative treatment benefit for all treated patients. Our results support the oligometastatic theory and the current trend of ablative treatment for oligometastatic spine disease.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES