Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1688:1–35. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7386-6_1

NMR of Macromolecular Assemblies and Machines at 1 GHz and Beyond: New Transformative Opportunities for Molecular Structural Biology

Caitlin M Quinn 1,2, Mingzhang Wang 1,2, Tatyana Polenova 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC6217836  NIHMSID: NIHMS995054  PMID: 29151202

1. Perspective

In the past two decades, the field of magnetic resonance has realized astounding advancements. One critical achievement toward progress in the fields of structural biology, materials science, and clinical imaging (to name just a few) has been the development of higher magnetic field strengths (14). Higher magnetic fields yield profound improvements in both sensitivity and resolution.

The greatest drawback of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relative to other analytical methods is relatively low sensitivity. Increasing magnetic field strength is a compelling way to increase sensitivity, as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR, i.e. sensitivity) scales approximately as the power of 3/2 with the magnetic field strength (5). The implications of improved sensitivity are numerous and include the capability to study increasingly large and complex biological systems (e.g. whole cells and viral particles), the expansion of applications to physiologically relevant nuclei beyond 1H, 13C, and 15N, such as 17O, 23Na, and 35Cl, as well as practical considerations, for instance shorter experiment times for multi-dimensional experiments (6).

Increased magnetic fields also yield improvements in resolution:

Δν  1γB0

where Δν is the linewidth. As with improvements in sensitivity, increased resolution allows for the study of more complex systems and visualization of finer structural details.

Beyond significant gains in sensitivity and resolution, increased magnetic field strengths are particularly powerful for the study of quadrupolar nuclei (I > ½). Quadrupolar nuclei yield very broad spectra (on the order of MHz) due to the strong coupling (expressed by the coupling constant, CQ) between the nuclear quadrupolar moment and the electric field gradient (EFG). At higher magnetic field strengths, the contributions of the second-order quadrupolar interaction are reduced, leading to narrower spectra (7).

Both NMR and clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) benefit from increased magnetic field strengths. (For reviews of applications of high magnetic fields to MRI see references (8, 9).) Here we focus on advancements in technology and methodology as applied in the burgeoning field of NMR at field strengths above 1 GHz. We also discuss several recent applications of high magnetic fields to the study of biological systems.

1.1. Current State of the Art

Numerous technological gains have promoted the advancement of NMR to current levels, where field strengths above 1 GHz (23.5 T) have recently been achieved (Figure 1). Such advancements have included improvements in superconducting materials, cryo-cooling, and resistive coils. To date, NMR spectrometers up to 1 GHz have utilized low temperature superconducting (LTS) materials such as Nb3Sn and NbTi. However, 1–1.1 GHz is believed to be the upper limit for magnets produced with only LTS materials due to limitations such as current density and temperature (1). Recent advancements have focused on the development of dual LTS/HTS (high temperature superconducting) magnets (1, 3, 1013) wherein the inner HTS coil(s) are surrounded by outer LTS coil(s) (Figure 1). The development of HTS materials (14), such as Rare Earth BaCo oxides (REBCO, e.g. YBCO (15, 16)) and Bi-2223 (Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10-x (17)), has faced challenges including mechanical properties of the materials and manufacturing (18, 19). HTS technology has very recently advanced to the stage where these materials can be used to generate reasonably stable and homogeneous magnetic fields for NMR. Beyond the development of HTS materials, challenges of the magnet technology have included jointing between the HTS and LTS coils (20) and field homogeneity, further discussed below. Furthermore, the addition of HTS coils creates a spatial challenge. A sufficiently wide bore is needed for biomolecular NMR measurements to be possible. (Bore size is also one of the critical limitations in applying MRI at higher magnetic fields.) One approach to overcoming this issue has been modifications in the geometry of LTS coils so that these take up less space (21).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Advancements in magnetic field strengths for NMR over the last few decades. Yellow indicates LTS magnets while green indicates dual LTS/HTS magnets. The dashed line indicates a frequency of 1 GHz (23.5 T). (b) General schematic of dual LTS/HTS magnet including shim coils and superconducting magnet coils. The precise number of LTS and HTS coils may vary. Purple represents superconducting shim coils, while blue represents outer NbTi LTS coils, orange represents Nb3Sn inner LTS coils, and green represents HTS coils. Within the magnet bore, maroon (outer) and pink (inner) bars represent the ferromagnetic and room temperature shim coils respectively.

To date, work on ultrahigh field LTS/HTS magnets for biomolecular NMR applications has focused on proof of concept, with the bulk of published work done on the 24 T magnet at the National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) developed in collaboration with RIKEN, Kobe Steel, and JEOL (Japan) (1, 22). The magnet reached 1020 GHz in 2015 using a Bi-2223 inner HTS coil with outer NbTi and Nb3Sn LTS coils. With this magnet, they have demonstrated the ability to acquire high-quality natural abundance spectra for insensitive nuclei such as 17O (0.04% natural abundance (1, 23)). 1H-1H-1H 3D data indicate the field homogeneity and stability achieved at 24 T (24). As discussed below, a significant advantage of magnetic field strengths over 1 GHz is in the measurement of chemical shift anisotropies (CSAs). The CSA scales with the B0 field, thus at higher fields CSAs are larger and can be measured more accurately. This is particularly advantageous for small CSAs, such as for the aliphatic protons. Pandey et al. demonstrated the measurement of 1H CSAs for L-histidine with the dual LTS/HTS 24 T spectrometer (24).

Beyond superconducting coil technology, for successful operation of ultrahigh field spectrometers advancements have needed to be made with respect to other spectrometer components, concurrent with the development of LTS/HTS magnets. Magnetic field stability and homogeneity are critical to successful experiments. A significant issue in the use of HTS technology for NMR is the inhomogeneous magnetic fields generated by the HTS materials. To compensate for these inhomogeneities in the LTS/HTS systems requires the use of ferromagnetic shim coils in addition to the standard superconducting and room temperature shims used in LTS magnets (25, 26). Due to residual resistance in the HTS coils and further advancements still needed in HTS/LTS jointing, for stable operation of the 1.02 GHz NMR spectrometer at NIMS, the magnet needed be to run in external current or driven mode (27). Field fluctuations generated by the DC power supply had to be corrected with an external 2H lock, not typically required for solid state NMR experiments (28). Further, use of a DC power supply required development of a new safety mechanism in case of power failure (29). Additional developments for the use of HTS materials in ultrahigh field magnets have included design of active quench protection (30) and advancements in cryo-cooling and refrigeration (31, 32).

The next stage in the evolution of increased magnetic field strengths for applications in NMR may be hybrid magnets, where an inner resistive coil is surrounded by an outer superconducting coil. NMR spectrometers currently in use utilize only superconducting coils, with 27 T the highest field achieved to date (the instrument setup for this system is not compatible with biomolecular NMR measurements due to the narrow bore size (33)). Challenges in the development of hybrid magnets for applications in NMR include field stability and homogeneity, cost of operation, and size considerations. The highest persistent magnetic field strength from a hybrid magnet to date is the 45 T spectrometer at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL); however, due to the small bore size, applications are limited to condensed matter physics. The first-in-class hybrid magnet intended for applications including biomolecular NMR and chemistry is the 36 T Series Connected Hybrid (SCH) magnet being developed at NHMFL (34), which makes use of Florida-Bitter resistive coils (35) and Nb3Sn superconducting coils. Designing the resistive and superconducting coils to be powered in series rather than in parallel was a significant achievement that greatly reduced the size, stability, and operating costs of the 36 T magnet relative to the 45 T hybrid magnet. An additional significant achievement of the 36 T magnet is the 40 mm bore size, large enough to accommodate the instrumentation needed for biomolecular NMR experiments. 1 GHz magnets currently produced by Bruker have a standard 54 mm bore. At present efforts are concentrated on achieving the high field homogeneity needed for NMR experiments.

As mentioned above, increased magnetic field strengths in NMR will have a major impact in a significant number of fields including structural biology, materials science, and imaging. NMR studies of inorganic materials will greatly benefit from increased magnetic field strengths as many inorganic nuclei have large quadrupolar coupling constants and/or low natural abundance. Nuclei of particular interest for inorganic applications that have been shown to benefit from higher magnetic field strengths include 6Li (I = 1, 7.6% natural abundance (NA) (36, 37)), 11B (I = 3/2, 80.1% NA (36, 38)), 17O (I = 5/2, 0.04% NA (38, 39)), 25Mg (I = 5/2, 10.0% NA (36, 38)), 27Al (I = 5/2, 100% NA (38)), 59Co (I = 7/2, 100% NA (40, 41)), 73Ge (I = 9/2, 7.7% NA (42)), and 127I (I = 5/2, 100% NA (43, 44)). These elements are essential components of materials in many fields of inorganic chemistry research, including batteries and fuel cells, semiconductors, optical materials, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), catalysts, and glasses. NMR studies of these materials can yield valuable information often inaccessible by other methods including structure, oxidation state, hydrogen bonding environment, molecular motions, and effects of impurities.

Key applications in the field of structural biology that will benefit from development of ultrahigh magnetic fields include membrane proteins in native-like environments, intrinsically disordered proteins such as amyloids and other neurodegenerative proteins, as well as emergent properties associated with complex environments, such as whole cells and intact viral particles, and bodily fluids (in metabolomics). Increased field strengths will yield enhanced detection of low concentration species and increased chemical shift dispersion. In addition, the vast majority of structural biology work in NMR at present utilizes 1H, 13C, and 15N nuclei. However, there are many additional NMR active nuclei with critical roles in biology for which work has been limited to date due to sensitivity- and resolution-related challenges, such as 35/37Cl and 23Na. The group at NIMS in Japan has demonstrated measurements at 24 T on the spin 3/2 nuclei 35Cl and 37Cl (44, 45), as well as 17O (1, 23). One of the fields with greatest potential for growth with the advent of magnetic fields over 1GHz is 17O NMR (39, 46), a critical element in biology which could serve as an exquisite probe for a variety of mechanistic and structural questions, including enzyme catalysis, pharmaceuticals analysis, protein structure and hydration (47, 48), as well as materials/MOF applications mentioned above. To date 17O has not been extensively exploited due to its extremely low natural abundance and the often prohibitive cost of isotopic enrichment. In addition to expanding the repertoire of available nuclei, greater sensitivity will improve the ease of studying 13C and 15N at natural abundance (1% and 0.3% respectively). This is particularly advantageous for systems that cannot be readily isotopically labeled, as well as for in vivo studies. In the following sections we discuss several methods with potentially powerful applications in structural biology at ultrahigh magnetic fields, with regards to achieving the highest quality data, as well as methods to address pressing questions related to protein structure and function. We also highlight several recent notable applications of ultrahigh fields to the study of increasingly complex biological problems.

2. Methods for the Study of Biomolecules at Ultrahigh Magnetic Fields

Ultrahigh magnetic fields benefit the study of macromolecules both by solution NMR and solid-state NMR. At higher fields, the chemical shift dispersion increases linearly. As discussed above, increased field strengths improve both sensitivity and resolution. Narrower line widths facilitate the atomic resolution structural analysis of large biomolecules, ranging from soluble proteins, to protein assemblies, biological complexes, and membrane-embedded and disordered proteins.

2.1. Sensitivity and Resolution Enhancement

Detection Methods: Solid-State and Solution NMR

With increasing magnetic field strengths and concomitant improvements in sensitivity and resolution, additional detection methods have become available to both solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopists. To obtain maximum sensitivity it is preferable to detect on the highest γ nucleus. Given the large 1H gyromagnetic ratio, for many biological systems, this means 1H-detection. Another consequence of proton’s high γ is the very strong 1H-1H homonuclear dipolar coupling, which is on the order of 100 kHz:

D= μ04πγ1γ2r123

where r12 is the distance between the two nuclei. In the absence of motional averaging, the strong 1H-1H dipolar coupling causes severe line broadening. Molecular tumbling in solution averages the dipolar coupling, yielding narrow proton lines. Thus in solution NMR, 1H-detection is the standard approach. However, in the solid state, 1H lines are very broad. Therefore, magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR experiments traditionally have relied on the detection of 13C and 15N to obtain significantly higher resolution (4951). However, this approach sacrifices sensitivity given the smaller gyromagnetic ratios of 13C and 15N. With heteronuclear detection in the solid state a large amount of isotopically labeled sample (typically 10–20 mg) and long data acquisition times are required to compensate for the low sensitivity (49, 52).

Given the resolution enhancement obtained at ultrahigh magnetic fields and the development of fast MAS probes (discussed below), it has become feasible to obtain high-sensitivity solution-like 1H-detected spectra in the solid state. At MAS rates below ~ 100 kHz a degree of 1H dilution is typically still required to eliminate broadening from residual 1H-1H couplings (vide infra). A great deal of work toward the execution of 1H detection in the solid state has focused on achieving the optimum level of deuteration for the best combination of sensitivity and resolution. Early work indicated that at moderate MAS rates (~10–30 kHz) relatively high levels of deuteration were required (5355). Oschkinat and co-workers demonstrated that there is no difference in 1H linewidths for samples with 10% or 100% 1HN back exchange at fast MAS rates (> 60 kHz) and 1 GHz magnetic field (56). Pintacuda and co-workers recently established for 2 proteins (GB1, 56 residues and AP205CP, 130 residues) that with 100 kHz MAS and ultrahigh fields, protein structure determination from 1H-detected data sets of fully protonated proteins is feasible (57).

In recent years, heteronuclear detection has become increasingly utilized in solution NMR (58, 59). Heteronuclear chemical shifts are sensitive to different dynamics timescales than protons, allowing researchers to gain access to information that may be absent in 1H-detected experiments. Heteronuclear detection eliminates issues associated with solvent exchange, an important consideration at or near physiological conditions (60). Furthermore, heteronuclear chemical shifts often have greater dispersion than 1H shifts, an effect that becomes more pronounced at higher magnetic fields and is particularly advantageous for disordered systems (61). Under certain conditions, heteronuclear detection may not result in loss of sensitivity compared to 1H detection (62).

Fast Magic Angle Spinning

With significant advancements in probe and coil design, it is currently possible to spin samples at rates up to ~110 kHz. Fast MAS is a powerful tool for proton detection in bimolecular systems, which in conjunction with ultrahigh fields, leads to further improvement in spectral resolution. Fast magic angle spinning is able to more efficiently average and at upwards of 100 kHz effectively eliminate the strong 1H-1H homonuclear dipolar coupling. This leads to substantially narrowed 1H linewidths, making 1H-detected experiments feasible in the solid state and with recent advances, eliminating requirements for deuteration. Critically, sensitivity losses due to the decreased sample amounts necessitated by the small rotor sizes are compensated by the increased sensitivity of 1H detection and high magnetic fields (63). Reinstra and co-workers first demonstrated proton-detected spectra of fully protonated GB1 at 40 kHz MAS and a 750 MHz magnetic field strength (64). Subsequently, Marchetti et al. reported the resolution enhancement achieved by increasing the magnetic field strength to 1 GHz with 60 kHz MAS, illustrated by dipolar-based 1H-15N CP-HSQC spectra of fully pronated single-stranded-DNA binding (SSB) protein from E.Coli. They also determined the unambiguous assignments of this medium-sized protein (18 kDa per monomer) with a set of 2D and 3D proton-detected 1H-15N, 1H-13C correlation experiments (65). Weingarth and co-workers demonstrated a labeling scheme dubbed inverse fractional deuteration (iFD) to obtain high-resolution 1H-detected spectra for non-exchangeable protonation sites, such as membrane proteins (66). Recently, the combination of fast MAS (100 kHz) and proton detection at ultrahigh field was applied to a range of structurally diverse, fully protonated proteins including GB1, the bacteriophage coat protein AP205CP, and amyloid-forming HET-s (57, 67). The introduction of fast MAS permits the exploitation of fully protonated proteins for structural and dynamics investigations of biological macromolecules with 1H detection. Working with protonated proteins is preferred, not only for cost and time savings, but also for the ability to access 1H-1H distances, which can provide additional long-rang information among side-chains to improve accuracy of protein structure determination.

Non-Uniform Sampling

One approach for resolution or sensitivity enhancement is non-uniform sampling (NUS). Traditionally, in uniformly sampled data sets, points acquired in indirect dimensions are evenly spaced with respect to time. In NUS applications, during acquisition, acquired points are distributed non-linearly according to a chosen sampling scheme. Rather than discrete Fourier transform, NUS data sets are processed using reconstruction algorithms (68). Non-uniform sampling using random schedules weighted by a decaying function results in bona fide time domain sensitivity enhancements by reducing the number of points acquired, thereby allowing for more transients to be acquired in a given time frame (6972). NUS can also be used to obtain resolution enhancement by acquiring out to a longer acquisition time without increasing the number of points. This is a significant advantage given the enhanced resolution (and thus longer FIDs) obtained at higher magnetic fields (73).

With respect to high magnetic field applications in solution NMR, NUS is particularly valuable for multi-dimensional heteronuclear-detected experiments and challenging applications such as metabolomics (74), disordered proteins (7577), and in cell NMR (78), with higher dimensionality experiments offering improved resolution. Maximum entropy reconstruction algorithms have been demonstrated to be robust for these applications (79). Several important applications of NUS In the solid state relevant for ultrahigh field experiments have also been demonstrated including quadrupolar nuclei (17O MQMAS) (80), protein assemblies (70, 81), and high-dimensionality (e.g. 4D) proton-detected experiments (8183) to obtain inter-residue 1H-1H distances (methyl-methyl or amide-amide) for structure determination.

2.2. Resonance Assignment Strategies

To determine structures and examine dynamics of biological macromolecules by NMR, the first, essential step is unequivocal resonance assignments of the individual backbone and sidechain atoms in the target protein. Resonance assignments are determined by a set of 2D and 3D (and sometimes higher dimensionality) experiments that provide intra- and inter-residue backbone and side-chain correlations. To complete assignments and overcome challenges of spectral resolution associated with large proteins and complex biological systems, several strategies have been developed. In conjunction with ultrahigh fields, choice of appropriate labeling schemes for sample preparation and novel pulse sequences further contribute to obtaining high-resolution spectra for accurate and rapid resonance assignments.

Labeling Schemes

Many isotope labeling schemes exist to achieve spectral simplification as well as reduced linewidths due to decreased spin diffusion/transverse relaxation. In MAS NMR, precise structure calculations typically require 13C-13C distance restrains and torsion angles. There are a number of sparse/extensive (as opposed to uniform) 13C labeling schemes, such as [1,3-13C]-glycerol, [2-13C]-glycerol, [1,6-13C]-glucose, and [2-13C]-glucose metabolic precursors (52, 8486) used to obtain distance restraints of 2–7 Å (52, 87). In addition, partial deuteration labeling schemes such as RAP, ILV, and SAIL are suitable to reduce homonuclear dipolar couplings and transverse relaxation, and resolve aliphatic 1H-13C correlations with high resolution and sensitivity in both solution and solid state NMR (53, 55). To obtain increased resolution enhancement of aliphatic protons for tertiary structure determination, Reif and co-workers introduced Reduced Adjoining Protonation (RAP, (88)), in which side chain protonation is diluted by expressing the protein with 2H-glucose and a low H2O/D2O ratio (5–15% and 85–95% respectively) to obtain aliphatic 1H linewidths ~ 25Hz. In this approach, re-protonation at exchangeable sites is not needed. ILV labeling schemes, introduced by Kay and co-workers for selective, stereospecific protonation of methyl groups in Ile, Leu, and Val (8991) have been extended to Ala, Thr, and Met (for review see (92, 93)). This labeling scheme allows for the measurement of more 1H-1H NOEs in a deuterated protein and for the study of larger proteins by solution NMR. A cell-free protocol that has been used is stereo-array isotope labeling (SAIL) of methyl, methylene, and aromatic groups with a combination of 1H/2H/12C/13C patterns (94). The cell free expression protocol prevents isotope scrambling and like ILV-labeling yields narrower lines than uniform 2H,13C,15N-labeling. All of these labeling schemes are fully applicable for experiments at high magnetic fields.

Pulse Sequence Design

Just a few decades ago, solution NMR studies of biological systems were limited by the size of the target protein (~ 30 kDa). Since the introduction of Transverse Relaxation Optimized SpectroscopY (TROSY), solution NMR can be applied to analyze targets with molecular weights of up to 100 kDa in solution (95, 96). At high fields, the transverse relaxation (T2) is dominated by the chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) and dipole-dipole coupling (DD). The TROSY pulse sequence suppresses T2 by employing constructive interference between the CSA and dipolar coupling (96). Thus, the sensitivity enhancement yielded by the TROSY sequence is more pronounced at higher magnetic fields, with the optimal field strength for 1H-detected TROSY being 1 GHz (97, 98).

While 1H-detection has been the method of choice in solution NMR, 15N- and 13C-detected pulse sequences have been developed and make use of increased magnetic fields to achieve higher resolution and site-specific information. Takeuchi et al reported a modified TROSY sequence selective for amide protons (TROSY 15NH), which benefits from the slow T2 and overcomes the low sensitivity of 15N (62, 99). Theoretical simulations indicate maximum sensitivity of TROSY 15NH at a strength field of 1.2 GHz, and the narrowest line width at 900 MHz (Fig. 2(A), (99)), allowing solution NMR spectroscopists to take advantage of higher field strengths where 1H-detected TROSY suffers from reduced resolution. With this approach, deuterated samples are not necessary and high-resolution spectra can be obtained using a 15N-detected TROSY-HSQC experiment (Fig. 2 B,C). Recently, Yoshimura et. al. demonstrated a 13C-detected NMR experiment for probing arginine side chain 15Nη/ε13Cζ correlations at high magnetic field strengths, which facilitates determination of the arginine ionization states indicating conformational changes in the target protein (100). This method also makes use of J-based cross polarization, a method that has shown particular promise for disordered proteins as well (101, 102).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) Simulated plots of TROSY 15NH relaxation rates and relative peak heights as a function of magnetic field strength. (b) Pulse sequences for the 1H- (right) and 15N- (left) detected 2D TROSY-HSQC experiments. (c) Left: 15N-detected TROSY-HSQC, right: 1H-detected TROSY-HSQC. (d) Top: 15N projection of the 2D 15N-detected TROSY-HSQC (left) and 1H-detected TROSY-HSQC (right). Bottom: Selected 15N cross sections of the 2D 15N-detected TROSY-HSQC (left) and 1H-detected TROSY-HSQC (right). Reprinted with permission from Takeuchi, K et al., J. Biomol. NMR., 2015, 63 (4), 323–331. Copyright 2015 Springer.

In the solid state, the development of proton detection in conjunction with fast MAS and ultrahigh fields enables the use of solution-state derived pulse sequences including 3D 1H-detected pulse sequences for resonance assignments. 1H-detected CP-HSQC experiments (103) have been utilized to build 3D 1H-13C-15N correlation experiments, for example the inter-residue (H)CONH and intra-residue (H)CANH experiments (103), with additional 13C-13C correlation dimensions added for increased information content, e.g. DREAM (dipolar recoupling enhanced by amplitude modulation (104, 105)). At spinning speeds above 40 kHz, dipolar magnetization transfers become less efficient. By employing 13C-13C J-based coherence transfer blocks, multiple 13C-13C transfers are achieved in additional experiments for complete backbone resonance assignments: (H)CO(CA)NH, (H)(CO)CA(CO)NH, (H)(CA)CB(CA)NH, and (H)(CA)CB(CACO)NH (63, 106)). For RAP labeled samples, a pair of 3D (H)CCH and HCC(H) experiments were developed by Asami and Reif (Figure 3 (107)) for assigning 1Hα resonances based on correlations with 13Cα and 13CO/Cβ. High resolution was achieved with 13CO and 13Cβ homonuclear scalar decoupling during the 13Cα evolution period (108). An extension of these sequences, (HxCx)CγCxHx experiments, can also be applied for assignments of 13C-ILV-methyl labeled protonated samples (109).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) Pulse sequences of 3D (H)CCH and HCC(H) experiments for RAP-labeled proteins with (b) schematic of magnetization transfers at each step of the pulse sequence. Adapted with permission from Asami, S et al., J. Biomol. NMR., 2012, 52 (1), 31–39. Copyright 2012 Springer.

2.3. Methods for Structural and Dynamics Studies of Biomolecules

Many methods for the structural and dynamics characterization of biomolecules benefit from applications at high and ultrahigh magnetic fields. Certain methods, such as measurement of 1H CSAs, benefit directly from the higher fields as a result of changes in field-dependent nuclear properties. Other methods become easier to execute at higher fields due to inherent improvements in sensitivity and resolution, such as applications of relaxation and paramagnetism in the solid state. Here we highlight several methods that have been successfully applied at high and ultrahigh magnetic fields. Given the detailed structural and dynamics information these methods can provide, they will be essential components of ongoing and future work at ultrahigh magnetic fields.

1H-1H Distance Restraints

Distance restraints are a principal input for structure determination by NMR. In solution NMR structure determination, NOE-derived 1H-1H distances are a key restraint for structure determination, with an upper limit of ~ 5 Å. Until recently, distance restraints in the solid state were largely limited to heteroatoms such as 13C-13C and 15N-13C distances, which can typically probe distances up to ~ 7 Å. High magnetic fields in conjunction with fast MAS and 1H detection presents the opportunity to obtain accurate, high-resolution 1H-1H distance restraints. 1H-1H restraints can access longer distances (up to ~ 13 Å) and correlations not readily detected otherwise, such as inter-residue sidechain methyl-methyl distances with high-quality multi-dimensional 1H-15N and 1H-13C spectra and have proven valuable for tertiary structure determination (81). Early work on small molecules and model proteins utilized moderate MAS rates with heteronuclear detection (110, 111). Increased MAS rates and the use of deuteration schemes enabled the application of proton-detected 1H-1H distance restraints for structure determination (88, 103, 112). While previously extensive deuteration and/or selective 13C labeling (e.g. RAP or ILV) had been required, it was recently demonstrated that 1H-1H restraints of up to ~ 5.5 Å can be obtained for uniformly 1H,13C,15N-labeled samples at 1 GHz field with ~100 kHz MAS (57). Numerous schemes for acquiring proton-detected 1H-1H distance restraints at ultrahigh fields with fast MAS have been proposed. 3D (H)XHH with H-H RFDR mixing (113) has been used in structure determination of SOD (114), GB1 (57), and AP205 (57), with higher dimensionality experiments providing enhanced resolution and unambiguous assignments (112). Meier and co-workers applied DREAM (Dipolar Recoupling Enhanced by Amplitude Modulation) 1H-1H recoupling to obtain methyl-methyl contacts (82), and was applied for structure determination of M2 (115) and the cytoskeletal assembly BacA (81). Several groups have applied non-uniform sampling for 4D 1H-1H correlation experiments (8183). Based on the success of these solid state NMR methods for obtaining 1H-1H distance restraints applied to small- and medium-sized proteins, measurements of 1H-1H distance restraints are very promising for applications to complex biological systems at ultrahigh magnetic fields.

Measurement of 1H Chemical Shift Anisotropy

Hydrogen bonding in proteins is a key determinant of secondary and tertiary structure, and thus is a very valuable parameter for structure determination. The proton chemical shift tensor, and especially its anisotropic component, is highly sensitive to the hydrogen bonding environment (116, 117). Further, the 1H CSA is sensitive to dynamics on the submillisecond to microsecond timescales. In solution NMR, knowledge of tensor magnitudes is also required for quantitative relaxation studies in the characterization of protein motions and to optimize cross-correlated relaxation to achieve narrow linewidths. Thus it is of great interest to establish robust protocols for the measurements of site-specific 1H chemical shift anisotropies (CSAs) with high resolution. Measurements of 1H CSAs have presented a challenge for a number of reasons including the strong 1H-1H homonuclear dipolar coupling and the relatively small magnitude of the 1H CSA tensor. Two approaches for measuring 1H CSAs under MAS are R-symmetry recoupling sequences (118) and rotary resonance spin-locking (119). With the use of an appropriate R-symmetry element one can select for the 1H CSA and 1H-X heteronuclear dipole while eliminating contributions from 1H-1H homonuclear couplings for measurements in fully protonated proteins. Site-specific CSAs can be determined by incorporating the R-symmetry recoupling as one dimension in a 3D experiment with heteronuclear detection (120, 121). Two methods for the measurement of 1H CSAs in solution are CSA-dipolar cross-correlated relaxation, and residual CSA (RCSA) measurements in aligned media (122124). Cross-correlated relaxation measures the interconversion between the CSA and dipolar operators (e.g. Hy and 2HyNz in the case of amide proton CSAs) from which the chemical shift tensor parameters σxx, σyy, and σzz can be extracted using known formalism (125). A downside of this approach is that several cross- and auto-correlation rate measurements are needed for accurate determination of the tensor. The relationship between magnetic field strengths and cross-correlated relaxation rates is discussed below. With RCSA measurements in weakly aligned media, the magnitude and orientation of the CSA tensor can be determined based on changes in the chemical shift relative to an isotropic (i.e. tumbling) sample. Given the relatively small magnitude of the 1H CSA tensor and the B0 field dependence of the CSA interaction, executing these measurements at higher magnetic fields allows for increased resolution and accuracy of measurements (24). With the development of ultrahigh magnetic fields, use of 1H CSA tensors may become a routine parameter for use in protein structure determination by NMR.

Relaxation and Paramagnetic Effects

In the context of dynamics studies in biological systems by NMR, nuclear spin relaxation parameters provide a wealth of information related to domain flexibility, structural plasticity, and biological functions (126). Relaxation studies at ultrahigh magnetic fields in the solid state can take advantage of the ability to quickly acquire well-resolved 15N/13C-1H HSQC spectra at several relaxation intervals (e.g. pulse delay or spin-lock pulse length) (127129). Furthermore, fast MAS generally applied during these ultrahigh field measurements facilitates the accurate measurement of relaxation rates by reducing coherent contributions to the observed relaxation (130, 131). MAS NMR R1 and R measurements at high fields have been used to characterize site-specific protein backbone dynamics of several microcrystalline proteins (130, 132) and was recently applied for the study of protein-nucleic acid interactions (133).

The application of relaxation measurements at high fields in solution NMR requires careful consideration of how properties of the system, such as chemical shift timescale, CSA, CSA-dipolar cross correlation, and T1 are affected by the magnetic field strength. For example, for large systems, 15N longitudinal relaxation (R1) typically deceases at higher magnetic fields (134). Ishima demonstrated that for 15N R1 measurements at 900 MHz, the 1H-15N dipole/15N CSA cross correlation was not sufficiently suppressed in the initial decay affecting accuracy of the R1 measurements. The aforementioned cross correlated CSA-dipolar relaxation interference is a critical component of many solution NMR methods including the TROSY and nuclear Overhauser (NOE) techniques and CSA measurements. TROSY line narrowing is dependent on the CSA/DD cross-correlated relaxation, and hence the CSA magnitude and B0 field (96). 15N-detected TROSY takes advantage of the cross-correlated relaxation rate at high magnetic fields (900 MHz-1.2 GHz) to achieve comparable resolution and sensitivity to 1H-detected TROSY (99), allowing solution NMR spectroscopists to exploit higher magnetic fields without losing sensitivity or resolution due to unfavorable relaxation effects.

Paramagnetic effects provide a great deal of long-range structural information for proteins that contain paramagnetic centers, which may be endogenous or synthetically incorporated. In close proximity to a paramagnetic center, four effects exist: paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE), hyperfine shift (which includes the contact and pseudocontact shifts (PCS)), residual dipolar coupling (RDC), and cross-correlated relaxation (CCR) effects (135). Paramagnetic centers used in NMR applications include nitroxide radicals, Mn2+, Gd3+, Cu2+, Co2+, and lanthanides (136). Paramagnetic centers provide angular and distance information to facilitate the determination and further refinement of protein structures, with the distance and orientation dependence of PREs, PCSs, and RDCs used as restraints in NMR structure calculations (137). Paramagnetic centers have been used to examine many biological systems, such as metalloproteins, cysteine-containing targets attached with a metal tag, and biomolecules modified with a nitroxide spin-label (138142). Measuring site-specific PREs requires examination of relaxation decays dependent on the proximity of the paramagnetic center while PCSs are determined by the difference in chemical shifts between a diamagnetic and a paramagnetic species of the target protein (143).

With remarkable progress in proton detection and fast MAS at high magnetic fields, directly detected 1H spectra offer high sensitivity and resolution for rapid, quantitative measurements of PREs and pseudocontact shifts in MAS NMR. A further advantage of solid state NMR studies of paramagnetic systems is the absence of Curie relaxation, which leads to line broadening in solution, and very fast MAS allows for the observation of signals close to the paramagnetic center (142). 1H-detected, fast MAS PRE and PCS measurements of the metalloenzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) doped with paramagnetic Cu2+ or Co2+ demonstrate the potential power of ultrahigh fields for the study of paramagnetic systems (128, 143, 144). The different properties of these two paramagnetic centers made one ideal for PRE measurements (Cu2+) and the other better suited for PCS measurements (Co2+, Fig 4(B-D)). With the high-resolution 15N-1H CP-HSQC spectra, PREs were obtained from 15N and 13CO R1 relaxation rates for distances of up to ~ 20 Å (Fig 4(A)). High sensitivity enabled the use of 3D experiments for unambiguous assignment of the PCSs. These paramagnetic restraints were combined with 1H-1H distances to subsequently determine a well-defined backbone geometry and metal binding sites in human SOD (Fig 4(E-H)). It has also been demonstrated that 1H T2 relaxation rates can be used to obtain distance restraints of up to 32 Å (145). With access to spectrometers at and beyond 1 GHz, site-specific PRE and PCS measurements will be a significant contribution to structural and dynamics investigations of complex biological environments and high molecular weight macromolecules.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Paramagnetic effects in Cu2+/Co2+ loaded SOD by MAS NMR. (a) 15N and 13CO R1 and R relaxation rates for Cu+- (red, diamagnetic) and Cu2+- (blue, paramagnetic) bound SOD (144). (b) CP-HSQC spectra of Zn2+- (black, diamagnetic) and Co2+- (purple, paramagnetic) bound SOD (144). (c) Left: anisotropic susceptibility tensor for Co2+ with respect to SOD structure. Right: Identification and assignment of PCS from 3D (H)CONH experiment, color scheme as in (b). (d) Expansions of select PCSs from 3D (H)CONH experiment, color scheme as in (b). (e-h) Structure refinement of SOD (143). (e) No paramagnetic restraints, (f) with PRE restraints, (g) with PCS restraints, (h) with PRE and PCS restraints. (a) Reprinted with permission from Knight, MJ et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2012, 46 (9), 2108–2116. (b-d) Reprinted with permission from Knight, MJ et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134 (36), 14730–14733. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (e-h) Reprinted with permission from Knight, MJ et al., Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46 (9), 2108–2116. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Quadupolar Nuclei

Quadrupolar nuclei (spin I > ½) account for a significant number of NMR active nuclei and these elements, including Li, B, O, Na, Al, Cl, and Ca are essential components of biology, materials science, and pharmaceuticals. NMR studies of quadrupolar nuclei can yield information such as the chemical and hydrogen bonding environment and molecular motions. The study of quadrupolar nuclei with NMR has been a challenge due to line broadening induced by the strong quadrupolar couplings and the very broad (MHz) spectra limiting sensitivity and making it difficult to obtain uniform excitation. Higher magnetic fields are beneficial in the study of quadrupolar nuclei because the second order quadrupolar coupling, which typically cannot be eliminated by MAS alone, becomes smaller, hence observed central transition lines are narrower. Improved sensitivity is also beneficial, particularly for low-γ nuclei.

Early methods for the study of quadrupolar nuclei in the solid state included double frequency sweeps (DFS), rotor-assisted population transfer (RAPT), hyperbolic secant (HS) pulses, and double rotation (DOR) (for review see (146) and references therein). A significant advancement in the study of quadrupolar nuclei in the solid state was the development of multiple quantum magic angle spinning (MQMAS (147)), which removes the quadrupolar broadening, allows for the resolution of different species by retaining the isotropic shift, and enables quadrupole to spin-1/2 correlations (148). Though sensitivity can be limited, the method is more robust and easier to implement than others (149, 150). When very broad quadrupolar lines are present, static methods can be a better choice than MAS. Static methods for ultra-wideline measurement of quadrupolar nuclei include quadrupolar echo and QCMPG (quadupolar Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (151, 152)) which uses refocusing pulses during acquisition to record the spin echo and recapitulates the NMR lineshape. Typically several frequency steps (i.e. several spectra at different transmitter frequencies) are required to record the full spectrum. Alternatively, Schurko and co-workers have demonstrated the use of adiabatic pulses to excite a broader region of the spectrum, dubbed adiabatic WURST (wide-band uniform-rate smooth truncation (153)) in combination with QCPMG to obtain broadband excitation and high sensitivity (154, 155).

Quadrupolar relaxation can be exploited for solution NMR structure and dynamics studies of quadrupolar nuclei (156, 157). One approach that exploits quadrupolar relaxation and has been successful for the study of quadrupolar nuclei in the context of biological macromolecules (including 17O, 27Al, and 51V) is quadrupole central transition (QCT) NMR (48, 158160), which utilizes relaxation properties of the central transition at high magnetic fields (i.e. the slow tumbling regime) to obtain narrow lines. The combination of high magnetic fields and narrow lines allows for the observation of fine structural details and applications to larger biological systems (158), as demonstrated in 17O QCT experiments to study the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme Tryptophan synthase (48).

3. Applications of Ultrahigh Fields to the Study of Biological Systems

Ultrahigh field NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to investigate the structural and dynamics properties of macromolecules and their physiological relevance. In the past decade, numerous studies have convincingly demonstrated that increased magnetic fields bring improved resolution and sensitivity, enabling applications in both solution and solid states, including protein-ligand binding interactions (161, 162), and structure determination of soluble macromolecules (163, 164), cellular and viral assemblies (165), intact virus particles (166), membrane proteins (167), and amyloids (168, 169). Ultrahigh field NMR has demonstrated promising high quality results for future atomic-resolution studies of these highly challenging macromolecule targets and others, such as intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs, (61, 170)) and whole cells (171). Here, we highlight several remarkable studies benefited by ultrahigh field NMR techniques to solve interesting biological problems, as well as the current state-of-the-art in emerging fields that will benefit greatly from these technological developments.

The development of proton detection techniques under fast MAS frequencies at ultrahigh fields significantly expands the application of MAS NMR to biological complexes and large proteins. In recent years, the Pintacuda group has developed a rapid proton detection protocol (discussed in section 2.2) and applied it to numerous proteins in a range of assembly states, including the metalloenzyme SOD, microcrystalline SH3, β2m, sedimented nucleocapsids of AP205, the membrane protein M2 channel, and OmpG (63).

Structure determination using proton detection in fully protonated, uniform 13C,15N-labeled AP205CP was achieved with MAS frequencies of 100–111 kHz at 1 GHz magnetic field (57). AP205CP is a dimeric protein comprising the 2.5-MDa viral capsid of a single-stranded RNA bacteriophage. As shown in Figure 5, a series of remarkably high-resolution 1H-detected spectra including 13C-1H, 15N-1H CP-HSQC and (H)CCH experiments were used to obtain unambiguous assignments of about 78% of backbone protons and 65% of all proton resonances. In 3D (H)CCH experiments, 13C resonances of the aliphatic side chains were correlated to their protons, providing proton side chain information. 3D (H)CHHRFDR spectra were acquired to record the inter-molecular 1H-1H contacts for the final structure calculation (Fig 5C). Importantly, 104 inter-monomer contacts were detected, which served to define the dimer interface. The AP205CP dimer structure was determined by this approach with 0.5 mg of protein, less than 2 weeks of instrument time, and rapid analysis of the high-quality data. Further, together with this MAS NMR structure of AP205CP, an atomic-resolution model of the AP205 virus like particle (VLP) was proposed based on the crystal structure of the protein dimer and the cryo-EM (cryo-electron microscopy) structure of the assembled particle (172). Significantly, this somewhat heterogeneous sample exhibited broader 1H linewidths than GB1 (0.15–0.2 ppm vs 0.1 ppm for 1HN), but a high resolution structure could still be determined, suggesting the applicability of the approach to other challenging systems.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Structure determination of the viral protein AP205CP assemblies by MAS NMR at ultrahigh field. (a) (left) A superposition of 15N-1H CP-HSQC spectra of (red) a fully protonated sample at 100 kHz and (black) a perdeuterated, 100% NH sample at 60 kHz MAS frequency. (right) Expansions of 13C-1H CP-HSQC spectra of AP205CP methyl (top) and Hα-Cα (bottom) regions at 100 kHz MAS and 1 GHz field. (b) 13C-13C correlation spectrum (top) and select strips of a 3D (H)CCH spectrum of AP205CP (bottom). (c) Selected strips of a 3D (H)CHH spectrum for determination of distance restraints. The intermolecular peaks are underlined. (d) Expansion of the AP205CP dimer structure showing the restraints extracted from (c). Adapted with permission from Andreas, LB et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2016, 113 (33), 9187–9192.

Andreas et al. reported the MAS NMR structure of a drug-resistant mutation of Influenza A M218–60 in lipid bilayers (S31N mutant) (115). M2 is a tetrameric transmembrane protein that triggers membrane fusion by transporting protons at low pH during viral replication (173, 174). Understanding the structure and H+ transport mechanism of this drug-resistant mutant is essential for the development of novel influenza inhibitors. To obtain long-range distance restraints, several samples were prepared with different isotopic labeling schemes for various measurements, including uniform 13C/15N labeling, extensive 1,6-13C glucose labeling, labeling by residue type, deuteration and ILV-methyl labeling. Using MAS NMR at high and ultrahigh fields (750 MHz – 1GHz), well-resolved 2D and 3D 15N-13C, 13C-13C, and a series of 1H-detected spectra (63) were utilized for resonance assignments of M2. Many residues in the spectra exhibited peak doubling, which indicated M218–60 forms a two-fold symmetric dimer of dimers (Fig 6A). In addition to 13C-13C and 15N-13C long range correlations, 1H-detected 3D and 4D experiments were performed in order to measure inter-helical distances necessary for tetramer structure determination. 3D and 4D variations of (H)CHH (Fig 6 B-F) and (H)NHH experiments provided intermolecular contacts including methyl-methyl contacts and H37-W41 imidazole-indole contacts (Fig 6G). The M2 structure was determined with a total of 283 structural constraints. Different side chain conformations were observed for the gating and pH-sensing residues W41 and H37, indicating that two of the four helices exhibited an “indole in” conformation in one dimer and an “indole out” conformation in the other (Fig 6 H-J). This novel structure suggests that W41 and H37 are likely important in the H+ transport process. Furthermore, the conformation at the S31N mutation lends insight into the mechanism of drug resistance. Through this work, a protocol was established for structure determination of membrane proteins and other challenging protein targets at ultrahigh fields.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Structural and mechanistic studies of the membrane protein Influenza A M2 by MAS NMR at ultrahigh field. (a) Assigned 15N-1H CP-HSQC spectrum recorded at 60 kHz MAS and 1 GHz field. Peak doubling labeled in black and blue indicates the different conformations for each subunit of the dimer. (b) Methyl region of a 2D 13C-1H J-based spectrum of 13C,2H2,1H-ILV labeled M2 and (c-f) selected strips of a 4D HCHHCH spectrum. (g) H37’-W41 inter-residue cross peaks from an (H)NHHRFDR experiment. (h) Positions of H37 and W41 in the M2 dimer of dimers. (i) M2 pore surface indicating water accessibility/pore width: red: < 1 H2O, green = 1 H2O, and blue > 1 H2O. (j) C-terminal H37 and W41 adopts two different conformations in the dimer of dimers. Adapted with permission from Andreas, LB et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137 (47), 14877–14886. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Barbet-Massin et al. demonstrated the potential to investigate large and complex assemblies with fast MAS at ultrahigh fields (175). They characterized the structure and dynamics of a native-like Measles virus (MeV) nucleocapsid. The MeV nucleocapsid consists of a macromolecular assembly of a 525 residue protein, which has 2 domains: an ordered NCORE domain (residues 1–400) and a disordered NTAIL domain (residues 401–525). CP and J-based 15N-1H HSQC experiments were used to observe the rigid NCORE and dynamic NTAIL domains respectively. Bulk 15N T measurements indicated differences in local dynamics between NCORE of intact nucleocapsids and cleaved NCORE domains (where NTAIL is removed by trypsin digestion). An additional advantage of 1H-detection at ultrahigh fields is the ability to characterize hydration, solvent accessibility, and inter-molecular packing, which in this work detailed the increased disorder of the intact nucleocapsids relative to the cleaved NCORE domain. These studies further demonstrated that sample preparation by sedimentation protocols yields narrow proton linewidths under the experimental conditions utilized (i.e. 1 GHz field and 60 kHz MAS), paving the way for future studies of large, heterogeneous systems such as intact viral particles.

The development of ultrahigh field NMR spectrometers open further opportunities for the study of emerging phenomena such as whole cells, intact viral particles, and complex biomaterials. These samples are often very insensitive (low natural abundance, low γ nuclei, or isotopically labeled component is a small percentage of the total sample mass), and, given the complexity of in vivo systems, spectra are often crowded and suffer from line broadening. Furthermore, many nuclei of interest such as 43Ca are quadrupolar. These challenges can be overcome by the use of ultrahigh field spectrometers, and take advantage of the numerous methodological advances described above.

Whole Cell NMR

Whole cell NMR enables the study of biological systems under physiological conditions, such as in vivo cell density and effects of binding interactions and other elements of the cellular environment (176). Challenges to whole cell NMR include sample heterogeneity and cell integrity over the relatively long acquisition times of NMR experiments. To date only a few examples of in vivo protein structure determination have been presented. The first in-cell structure determination by NMR was of a 66 residue heavy metal binding protein overexpressed in E. coli using non-uniform sampling to efficiently acquire data before sample degradation (78). The same protocol was subsequently applied to structure determination of GB1 at 250 μM concentration, closer to physiological cellular concentrations (177). Another recent study presented structure determination of GB1 with a paramagnetic tag for PCS structural restraints in eukaryotic cells (178). Enhanced sensitivity from ultrahigh magnetic fields will likely increase the efficiency of in vivo structure determination of low concentration proteins. While remarkable results have been accomplished with respect to in vivo studies of disordered proteins (179), ultrahigh fields in combination with 13C detection methods (60, 102) will further benefit this area of research. NMR of IDPs suffers from severe sensitivity and resolution challenges due to dynamics, solvent exchange, and the lack of an ordered secondary structure. Lippens and co-workers presented a method for combined J- and CP-based correlation with 13CO detection at 900 MHz for characterization of disordered α-synculein in E. coli cells (102). Whole cell solid-state NMR studies have covered a wide range of systems including bacteria and biofilms to address many significant questions including perturbations in bacterial cell walls induced by drug binding (180, 181), cellular composition (182) and metabolomics (183), as well as monitoring of protein expression and cellular processes (184186). These studies are essential to address pressing issues such as antibiotic resistance (187189). In cell MAS NMR studies typically rely on 13C detection and due to the complex, heterogeneous environments resolution is a hindrance to obtaining atomic level information. The expanded use of ultrahigh magnetic fields, associated gains in sensitivity and resolution, and continued methods developments will significantly advance whole cell structural and dynamics studies by NMR.

Biomaterials is a broad discipline with both technological and clinical applications. NMR is a potentially powerful method for characterizing the structure and dynamics of biomaterials. Recent advances in NMR including ultrahigh field spectrometers will further expand the role of NMR in the study of biomaterials. There is great interest in furthering our understanding of the effects of disease and aging on human bone. MAS NMR at ultrahigh fields is uniquely suited to characterize the high-resolution structural features of bone for both high-resolution studies of 1H nuclei, as well as improved resolution for studies of quadrupolar nuclei that form essential components of bone such as 23Na and 43Ca. Ramamoorthy and co-workers demonstrated the first 1H-1H correlation spectra of bone at fast MAS (up to 110 kHz (190)) and extracted relaxation parameters to characterize the water distribution in bone. 43Ca (0.14% natural abundance) studies of hydroxyapatite, the primary component of bone, detected 2 different calcium coordination environments not observed at lower B0 fields, and determined the NMR parameters (δiso, CQ, ηQ) of the two local environments (191) which were subsequently observed in bovine cortical bone at 833 MHz (192). In addition to 43Ca NMR, Laurencin et al. used 23Na of equine bone and bovine tooth to identify two sodium sites in those materials (193). For these studies, high magnetic fields (≥ 800 MHz) were valuable to overcome challenges associated with quadrupolar nuclei. Biosilica materials, such as enzymes encapsulated in or immobilized on an inorganic matrix of silica, are of great interest for their applications in biotechnology and chemical catalysis (194, 195). Catalytic activity of biosilica-associated enzymes requires conservation of active site structure upon association with the silica network. Stability of the catalytic complex is also essential. It has recently been demonstrated that MAS NMR at ultrahigh fields is a potentially powerful means to characterizing protein structure in these biosilica materials (196). Luchinat and co-workers showed sufficient resolution can be achieved at fast MAS and high fields (850 MHz) for 1H-detected studies of biosilica-encapsulated proteins (190). Another application of biosilica materials, diatoms are unicellular algae with a cell wall composed of silica. Structural features of the diatom cell wall are of interest for a wide range of applications including biotechnology, catalysis, and nanotechnology (197). 29Si NMR is a common approach for studies of both whole cell and isolated cell wall components of diatoms (see (198) for review). While to our knowledge, ultrahigh field studies have not been reported to date, this is another active field of biosilica research that may benefit from greater magnetic field strengths and associated advances.

4. Conclusions

Recent advancements in superconductor technology have made magnetic field strengths over 1 GHz accessible for NMR studies of biomolecular systems. Significant challenges such as field inhomogeneity have needed to be overcome for these instruments to provide atomic level information. Ultrahigh field spectrometers will have a significant impact in a wide range of disciplines including biology and materials science. Numerous methods have been developed that will further enhance the resolution and sensitivity gains that are realized as increased magnetic field strengths. The pioneering applications highlighted in this work indicate the promise of experiments at ultrahigh fields of 1 GHz and beyond in for a variety of complex biomolecules and biomaterials.

References

  • 1.Hashi K, Ohki S, Matsumoto S, Nishijima G, Goto A, Deguchi K, Yamada K, Noguchi T, Sakai S, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa Y, Iguchi S, Yamazaki T, Maeda H, Tanaka R, Nemoto T, Suematsu H, Miki T, Saito K, Shimizu T (2015) Achievement of 1020 MHz NMR. J Magn Reson 256,30–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hashi K, Shimizu T, Goto A, Kiyoshi T, Matsumoto S (2002) Achievement of a 920-MHz high resolution NMR. J Magn Reson 156,318–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yanagisawa Y, Nakagome H, Tennmei K, Hamada M, Yoshikawa M, Otsuka A, Hosono M, Kiyoshi T, Takahashi M, Yamazaki T, Maeda H (2010) Operation of a 500 MHz high temperature superconducting NMR: towards an NMR spectrometer operating beyond 1 GHz. J Magn Reson 203,274–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bird MD, Bai HY, Bole S, Chen JP, Dixon IR, Ehmler H, Gavrilin AV, Painter TA, Smeibidl P, Toth J, Weijers H, Xu T, Zhai YH (2009) The NHMFL hybrid magnet projects. IEEE T Appl Supercon 19,1612–1616 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Polenova T, Gupta R, Goldbourt A (2015) Magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy: a versatile technique for structural and dynamic analysis of solid-phase systems. Anal Chem 87,5458–5469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Boebinger GS, Comment A, Duckett S, Edison AS, Engelke F, Griesinger C, Griffin RG, Hilty C, Maeda H, Parigi G, Prisner T, Ravera E, van Bentum J, Vega S, Webb A, Luchinat C, Schwalbe H, Frydman L (2015) Facing and overcoming sensitivity challenges in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 54,9162–9185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Man PP Quadrupole couplings in nuclear magnetic resonance, general In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2000. p. 12224–12265. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Budinger TF, Bird MD, Frydman L, Long JR, Mareci TH, Rooney WD, Rosen B, Schenck JF, Schepkin VD, Sherry AD, Sodickson DK, Springer CS, Thulborn KR, Ugurbil K, Wald LL (2016) Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale. Magn Reson Mater Phys 29,617–639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Niendorf T, Barth M, Kober F, Trattnig S (2016) From ultrahigh to extreme field magnetic resonance: where physics, biology and medicine meet. Magn Reson Mater Phys 29,309–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bascunan J, Lee HG, Bobrov ES, Iwasa Y (2003) A low- and high-temperature superconducting NMR magnet: design and performance results. IEEE T Appl Supercon 13,1550–1553 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bascunan J, Hahn S, Park DK, Iwasa Y (2011) A 1.3-GHz LTS/HTS NMR magnet- a progress report. IEEE T Appl Supercon 21,2092–2095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bascunan J, Hahn S, Lecrevisse T, Song JB, Miyagi D, Iwasa Y (2016) An 800-MHz all-REBCO insert for the 1.3-GHz LTS/HTS NMR magnet program- a progress report. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yanagisawa Y, Piao R, Iguchi S, Nakagome H, Takao T, Kominato K, Hamada M, Matsumoto S, Suematsu H, Jin X, Takahashi M, Yamazaki T, Maeda H (2014) Operation of a 400 MHz NMR magnet using a (RE:Rare Earth)Ba2Cu3O7-x high-temperature superconducting coil: towards an ultra-compact super-high field NMR spectrometer operated beyond 1 GHz. J Magn Reson 249,38–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scanlan RM, Malozemoff AP, Larbalestier DC (2004) Superconducting materials for large scale applications. P IEEE 92,1639–1654 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsumoto S, Choi S, Kiyoshi T, Otsuka A, Hamada M, Maeda H, Yanagisawa Y, Nakagome H, Suematsu H (2012) REBCO layer-wound coil tests under electromagnetic forces in an external magnetic field of up to 17.2 T. IEEE T Appl Supercon 22, [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hazelton DW, Selvamanickam V, Duval JM, Larbalestier DC, Markiewicz WD, Weijers HW, Holtz RL (2009) Recent developments in 2G HTS coil technology. IEEE T Appl Supercon 19,2218–2222 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cheng MC, Yan BP, Lee KH, Ma QY, Yang ES (2005) A high temperature superconductor tape RF receiver coil for a low field magnetic resonance-imaging system. Supercond Sci Tech 18,1100–1105 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parizh M, Lvovsky Y, Sumption M (2017) Conductors for commercial MRI magnets beyond NbTi: requirements and challenges. Supercond Sci Tech 30, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kajita K, Iguchi S, Xu Y, Nawa M, Hamada M, Takao T, Nakagome H, Matsumoto S, Nishijima G, Suematsu H, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa Y (2016) Degradation of a REBCO coil due to cleavage and peeling originating from an electromagnetic force. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brittles GD, Mousavi T, Grovenor CRM, Aksoy C, Speller SC (2015) Persistent current joints between technological superconductors. Supercond Sci Tech 28, [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roth G: Ultra-high field magnets at Bruker In:Ultrahigh Field NMR and MRI: Science at a Crossroads, Bethesda, MD, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nishijima G, Matsumoto S, Hashi K, Ohki S, Goto A, Noguchi T, Iguchi S, Yanagisawa Y, Takahashi M, Maeda H, Miki T, Saito K, Tanaka R, Shimizu T (2016) Successful upgrading of 920-MHz NMR superconducting magnet to 1020 MHz using Bi-2223 innermost coil. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hashi K, Deguchi K, Yamazaki T, Ohki S, Matsumoto S, Nishijima G, Goto A, Yamada K, Noguchi T, Sakai S, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa Y, Iguchi S, Maeda H, Tanaka R, Nemoto T, Suematsu H, To J, Torres J, Pervushin K, Shimizu T (2016) Efficiency of high magnetic fields in solid-state NMR. Chem Lett 45,209–210 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pandey MK, Zhang RC, Hashi K, Ohki S, Nishijima G, Matsumoto S, Noguchi T, Deguchi K, Goto A, Shimizu T, Maeda H, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa Y, Yamazaki T, Iguchi S, Tanaka R, Nemoto T, Miyamoto T, Suematsu H, Saito K, Miki T, Ramamoorthy A, Nishiyama Y (2015) 1020 MHz single-channel proton fast magic angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 261,1–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iguchi S, Piao R, Hamada M, Matsumoto S, Suematsu H, Takao T, Saito AT, Li J, Nakagome H, Jin X, Takahashi M, Maeda H, Yanagisawa Y (2016) Advanced field shimming technology to reduce the influence of a screening current in a REBCO coil for a high-resolution NMR magnet. Supercond Sci Tech 29, [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iguchi S, Yanagisawa Y, Takahashi M, Takao T, Hashi K, Ohki S, Nishijima G, Matsumoto S, Noguchi T, Tanaka R, Suematsu H, Saito K, Shimizu T (2016) Shimming for the 1020 MHz LTS/Bi-2223 NMR magnet. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Otsuka A, Kiyoshi T, Matsumoto S, Kominato K, Takeda M (2008) Field stability of a 600 MHz NMR magnet in the driven-mode operation. IEEE T Appl Supercon 18,852–855 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takahashi M, Ebisawa Y, Tennmei K, Yanagisawa Y, Hosono M, Takasugi K, Hase T, Miyazaki T, Fujito T, Nakagome H, Kiyoshi T, Yamazaki T, Maeda H (2012) Towards a beyond 1 GHz solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance: external lock operation in an external current mode for a 500 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance. Rev Sci Instrum 83, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matsumoto S, Kiyoshi T, Nishijima G, Hashi K, Takahashi M, Noguchi T, Ohki S, Maeda H, Shimizu T (2016) Equipment for power outage in operation of driven-mode NMR magnet. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gavrilin AV, Weijers HW, et al. : Comprehensive Modelling Study of Quench Behaviour of the NHMFL 32 T All-superconducting Magnet System. Input Data and Methodology Aspects. In:The 5th International Workshop on Numerical Modelling of High Temperature Superconductors, Bologna, Italy, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bai HY, Bird MD, Cantrell KR, Dixon IR, Gavrilin AV (2009) Design of cryogenic system for SCH magnets. IEEE T Appl Supercon 19,1596–1599 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Choi YS, Kim DL, Painter TA, Markiewicz WD, Lee BS, Yang HS, Yoo JS (2008) Closed-loop cryogenic cooling for a 21 T FT-ICR magnet system. IEEE T Appl Supercon 18,1471–1474 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. MagLab claims record with novel superconducting magnet 2015. [cited 2017 January 3]. Available from: https://nationalmaglab.org/news-events/news/maglab-claims-record-with-novel-superconducting-magnet.
  • 34.Bird MD, Dixon IR, Toth J (2015) Large, high-field magnet projects at the NHMFL. IEEE T Appl Supercon 25,1–6 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Toth J (2016) Resistive insert magnet designs for the series-connected hybrids developed at the NHMFL. IEEE T Appl Supercon 26, [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hu JZ, Kwak JH, Yang Z, Wan X, Shaw LL (2009) Direct observation of ion exchange in mechanically activated LiH + MgB2 system using ultrahigh field nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 94,1–3 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vijayakumar M, Kerisit S, Yang ZG, Graff GL, Liu J, Sears JA, Burton SD, Rosso KM, Hu JZ (2009) Combined 6Li, 7Li NMR and molecular dynamics study of Li diffusion in Li2TiO3. J Phys Chem C 113,20108–20116 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kroeker S, Neuhoff PS, Stebbins JF (2001) Enhanced resolution and quantitation from ‘ultrahigh’ field NMR spectroscopy of glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 293,440–445 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu G (2016) Solid-state 17O NMR studies of organic and biological molecules: recent advances and future directions. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 73,1–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Crewdson P, Bryce DL, Rominger F, Hofmann P (2008) Application of ultrahigh-field 59Co solid-state NMR spectroscopy in the investigation of the 1,2-polybutadiene catalyst [Co(C8H13)(C4H6)]. Angew Chem Int Ed 47,3454–3457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ooms KJ, Terskikh VV, Wasylishen RE (2007) Ultrahigh-field solid-state 59Co NMR studies of Co(C2B9H11)2- and Co(C5H5)2+ salts. J Am Chem Soc 129,6704–6705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greer BJ, Michaelis VK, Terskikh VV, Kroeker S (2011) Reconnaissance of diverse structural and electronic environments in germanium halides by solid-state Ge NMR and quantum chemical calculations. Can J Chem 89,1118–1129 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Widdifield CM, Bryce DL (2010) Solid-state 127I NMR and GIPAW DFT study of metal iodides and their hydrates: structure, symmetry, and higher-order quadrupole-induced effects. J Phys Chem A 114,10810–10823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Widdifield CM, Chapman RP, Bryce DL (2009) Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc 66,195–326 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pandey A, Hashi K, Ohki S, Nishijima G, Matsumoto S, Noguchi T, Deguchi K, Goto A, Shimizu T, Maeda H, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa Y, Yamazaki T, Iguchi S, Tanaka R, Nemoto T, Miyamoto T, Suematsu H, Saito K, Miki T, Nishiyama Y (2016) 24 T high-resolution and -sensitivity solid-state NMR measurements of low-gamma half-integer quadrupolar nuclei 35Cl and 37Cl. Anal Sci 32,1339–1345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wong A, Poli F (2014) Solid-state 17O NMR studies of biomolecules. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc 83,145–220 [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gerothanassis IP (2010) Oxygen-17 NMR spectroscopy: basic principles and applications. Part II. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 57,1–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Young RP, Caulkins BG, Borchardt D, Bulloch DN, Larive CK, Dunn MF, Mueller LJ (2016) Solution-state 17O quadrupole central-transition NMR spectroscopy in the active site of tryptophan synthase. Angew Chem Int Ed 55,1350–1354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sun SJ, Han Y, Paramasivam S, Yan S, Siglin AE, Williams JC, Byeon IJL, Ahn J, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T (2012) Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of protein complexes. Methods Mol Biol 831,303–331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Igumenova TI, McDermott AE, Zilm KW, Martin RW, Paulson EK, Wand AJ (2004) Assignments of carbon NMR resonances for microcrystalline ubiquitin. J Am Chem Soc 126,6720–6727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Igumenova TI, Wand AJ, McDermott AE (2004) Assignment of the backbone resonances for microcrystalline ubiquitin. J Am Chem Soc 126,5323–5331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Castellani F, van Rossum B, Diehl A, Schubert M, Rehbein K, Oschkinat H (2002) Structure of a protein determined by solid-state magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. Nature 420,98–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chevelkov V, van Rossum BJ, Castellani F, Rehbein K, Diehl A, Hohwy M, Steuernagel S, Engelke F, Oschkinat H, Reif B (2003) 1H detection in MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy of biomacromolecules employing pulsed field gradients for residual solvent suppression. J Am Chem Soc 125,7788–7789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Paulson EK, Morcombe CR, Gaponenko V, Dancheck B, Byrd RA, Zilm KW (2003) Sensitive high resolution inverse detection NMR spectroscopy of proteins in the solid state. J Am Chem Soc 125,15831–15836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chevelkov V, Rehbein K, Diehl A, Reif B (2006) Ultrahigh resolution in proton solid-state NMR spectroscopy at high levels of deuteration. Angew Chem Int Ed 45,3878–3881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lewandowski JR, Dumez JN, Akbey U, Lange S, Emsley L, Oschkinat H (2011) Enhanced resolution and coherence lifetimes in the solid-state NMR spectroscopy of perdeuterated proteins under ultrafast magic-angle spinning. J Phys Chem Lett 2,2205–2211 [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Andreas LB, Jaudzems K, Stanek J, Lalli D, Bertarello A, Le Marchand T, Cala-De Paepe D, Kotelovica S, Akopjana I, Knott B, Wegner S, Engelke F, Lesage A, Emsley L, Tars K, Herrmann T, Pintacuda G (2016) Structure of fully protonated proteins by proton-detected magic-angle spinning NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113,9187–9192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Felli IC, Brutscher B (2009) Recent advances in solution NMR: fast methods and heteronuclear direct detection. Chemphyschem 10,1356–1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Takeuchi K, Gal M, Shimada I, Wagner G (2012) Low-gamma nuclei detection experiments for biomolecular NMR. Rsc Biomol Sci 25,25–52 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Felli IC, Gonnelli L, Pierattelli R (2014) In-cell 13C NMR spectroscopy for the study of intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat Protoc 9,2005–2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Felli IC, Pierattelli R (2014) Novel methods based on 13C detection to study intrinsically disordered proteins. J Magn Reson 241,115–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takeuchi K, Arthanari H, Imai MK, Wagner G, Shimada I (2016) Nitrogen-detected TROSY yields comparable sensitivity to proton-detected TROSY for non-deuterated, large proteins under physiological salt conditions. J Biomol NMR 64,143–151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Barbet-Massin E, Pell AJ, Retel JS, Andreas LB, Jaudzems K, Franks WT, Nieuwkoop AJ, Hiller M, Higman V, Guerry P, Bertarello A, Knight MJ, Felletti M, Le Marchand T, Kotelovica S, Akopjana I, Tars K, Stoppini M, Bellotti V, Bolognesi M, Ricagno S, Chou JJ, Griffin RG, Oschkinat H, Lesage A, Emsley L, Herrmann T, Pintacuda G (2014) Rapid proton-detected NMR assignment for proteins with fast magic angle spinning. J Am Chem Soc 136,12489–12497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sperling LJ, Nieuwkoop AJ, Lipton AS, Berthold DA, Rienstra CM (2010) High resolution NMR spectroscopy of nanocrystalline proteins at ultra-high magnetic field. J Biomol NMR 46,149–155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Marchetti A, Jehle S, Felletti M, Knight MJ, Wang Y, Xu ZQ, Park AY, Otting G, Lesage A, Emsley L, Dixon NE, Pintacuda G (2012) Backbone assignment of fully protonated solid proteins by 1H detection and ultrafast magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 51,10756–10759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Medeiros-Silva J, Mance D, Daniëls M, Jekhmane S, Houben K, Baldus M, Weingarth M (2016) 1H-detected solid-state NMR studies of water-inaccessible proteins in vitro and in situ. Angew Chem Int Ed 55,13606–13610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stanek J, Andreas LB, Jaudzems K, Cala D, Lalli D, Bertarello A, Schubeis T, Akopjana I, Kotelovica S, Tars K, Pica A, Leone S, Picone D, Xu ZQ, Dixon NE, Martinez D, Berbon M, El Mammeri N, Noubhani A, Saupe S, Habenstein B, Loquet A, Pintacuda G (2016) NMR spectroscopic assignment of backbone and side-chain protons in fully protonated proteins: microcrystals, sedimented assemblies, and amyloid fibrils. Angew Chem Int Ed 55,15503–15509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hyberts SG, Arthanari H, Wagner G (2012) Applications of non-uniform sampling and processing. Top Curr Chem 316,125–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rovnyak D, Sarcone M, Jiang Z (2011) Sensitivity enhancement for maximally resolved two-dimensional NMR by nonuniform sampling. Magn Reson Chem 49,483–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Paramasivam S, Suiter CL, Hou GJ, Sun SJ, Palmer M, Hoch JC, Rovnyak D, Polenova T (2012) Enhanced sensitivity by nonuniform sampling enables multidimensional MAS NMR spectroscopy of protein assemblies. J Phys Chem B 116,7416–7427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Suiter CL, Paramasivam S, Hou G, Sun S, Rice D, Hoch JC, Rovnyak D, Polenova T (2014) Sensitivity gains, linearity, and spectral reproducibility in nonuniformly sampled multidimensional MAS NMR spectra of high dynamic range. J Biomol NMR 59,57–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Palmer MR, Suiter CL, Henry GE, Rovnyak J, Hoch JC, Polenova T, Rovnyak D (2015) Sensitivity of nonuniform sampling NMR. J Phys Chem B 119,6502–6515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rovnyak D, Hoch J, Stern A, Wagner G (2004) Resolution and sensitivity of high field nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 30,1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hyberts SG, Heffron GJ, Tarragona NG, Solanky K, Edmonds KA, Luithardt H, Fejzo J, Chorev M, Aktas H, Colson K, Falchuk KH, Halperin JA, Wagner G (2007) Ultrahigh-resolution 1H-13C HSQC spectra of metabolite mixtures using nonlinear sampling and forward maximum entropy reconstruction. J Am Chem Soc 129,5108–5116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kazimierczuk K, Stanek J, Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk A, Kozminski W (2013) High-dimensional NMR spectra for structural studies of biomolecules. Chemphyschem 14,3015–3025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Roche J, Ying J, Maltsev AS, Bax A (2013) Impact of hydrostatic pressure on an intrinsically disordered protein: a high-pressure NMR study of alpha-synuclein. Chembiochem 14,1754–1761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Marion D (2010) Combining methods for speeding up multi-dimensional acquisition. Sparse sampling and fast pulsing methods for unfolded proteins. J Magn Reson 206,81–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sakakibara D, Sasaki A, Ikeya T, Hamatsu J, Hanashima T, Mishima M, Yoshimasu M, Hayashi N, Mikawa T, Walchli M, Smith BO, Shirakawa M, Guntert P, Ito Y (2009) Protein structure determination in living cells by in-cell NMR spectroscopy. Nature 458,102–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hoch JC, Maciejewski MW, Mobli M, Schuyler AD, Stern AS (2014) Nonuniform sampling and maximum entropy reconstruction in multidimensional NMR. Acc Chem Res 47,708–717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rovnyak D, Filip C, Itin B, Stern AS, Wagner G, Griffin RG, Hoch JC (2003) Multiple-quantum magic-angle spinning spectroscopy using nonlinear sampling. J Magn Reson 161,43–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shi C, Fricke P, Lin L, Chevelkov V, Wegstroth M, Giller K, Becker S, Thanbichler M, Lange A (2015) Atomic-resolution structure of cytoskeletal bactofilin by solid-state NMR. Sci Adv 1,e1501087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Huber M, Hiller S, Schanda P, Ernst M, Bockmann A, Verel R, Meier BH (2011) A proton-detected 4D solid-state NMR experiment for protein structure determination. Chemphyschem 12,915–918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Linser R, Bardiaux B, Andreas LB, Hyberts SG, Morris VK, Pintacuda G, Sunde M, Kwan AH, Wagner G (2014) Solid-state NMR structure determination from diagonal-compensated, sparsely nonuniform-sampled 4D proton-proton restraints. J Am Chem Soc 136,11002–11010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.LeMaster DM, Kushlan DM (1996) Dynamical mapping of E-coli thioredoxin via 13C NMR relaxation analysis. J Am Chem Soc 118,9255–9264 [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Higman VA, Flinders J, Hiller M, Jehle S, Markovic S, Fiedler S, van Rossum BJ, Oschkinat H (2009) Assigning large proteins in the solid state: a MAS NMR resonance assignment strategy using selectively and extensively 13C-labelled proteins. J Biomol NMR 44,245–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hong M (1999) Determination of multiple phi-torsion angles in proteins by selective and extensive 13C labeling and two-dimensional solid-state NMR. J Magn Reson 139,389–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lian LY, Middleton DA (2001) Labelling approaches for protein structural studies by solution-state and solid-state NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 39,171–190 [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Asami S, Schmieder P, Reif B (2010) High resolution 1H-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy of protein aliphatic resonances: access to tertiary structure information. J Am Chem Soc 132,15133–15135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gardner KH, Rosen MK, Kay LE (1997) Global folds of highly deuterated, methyl-protonated proteins by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry-US 36,1389–1401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Goto NK, Gardner KH, Mueller GA, Willis RC, Kay LE (1999) A robust and cost-effective method for the production of Val, Leu, Ile δ1 methyl-protonated 15N-, 13C-, 2H-labeled proteins. J Biomol NMR 13,369–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gans P, Hamelin O, Sounier R, Ayala I, Dura MA, Amero CD, Noirclerc-Savoye M, Franzetti B, Plevin MJ, Boisbouvier J (2010) Stereospecific isotopic labeling of methyl groups for NMR spectroscopic studies of high-molecular-weight proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed 49,1958–1962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhang H, van Ingen H (2016) Isotope-labeling strategies for solution NMR studies of macromolecular assemblies. Curr Opin Struct Biol 38,75–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tugarinov V, Kanelis V, Kay LE (2006) Isotope labeling strategies for the study of high-molecular-weight proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy. Nat Protoc 1,749–754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kainosho M, Torizawa T, Iwashita Y, Terauchi T, Mei Ono A, Guntert P (2006) Optimal isotope labelling for NMR protein structure determinations. Nature 440,52–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Salzmann M, Pervushin K, Wider G, Senn H, Wuthrich K (2000) NMR assignment and secondary structure determination of an octameric 110 kDa protein using TROSY in triple resonance experiments. J Am Chem Soc 122,7543–7548 [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wuthrich K (1997) Attenuated T-2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. P Natl Acad Sci USA 94,12366–12371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Skinner AL, Laurence JS (2008) High-field solution NMR spectroscopy as a tool for assessing protein interactions with small molecule ligands. J Pharm Sci-Us 97,4670–4695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wuthrich K (1998) The second decade - into the third millennium. Nat Struct Biol 5,492–495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Takeuchi K, Arthanari H, Shimada I, Wagner G (2015) Nitrogen detected TROSY at high field yields high resolution and sensitivity for protein NMR. J Biomol NMR 63,323–331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yoshimura Y, Oktaviani NA, Yonezawa K, Kamikubo H, Mulder FA (2017) Unambiguous determination of protein arginine ionization states in solution by NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 56,239–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yuwen T, Skrynnikov NR (2014) CP-HISQC: a better version of HSQC experiment for intrinsically disordered proteins under physiological conditions. J Biomol NMR 58,175–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lopez J, Schneider R, Cantrelle FX, Huvent I, Lippens G (2016) Studying intrinsically disordered proteins under true in vivo conditions by combined cross-polarization and carbonyl-detection NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 55,7418–7422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhou DH, Shea JJ, Nieuwkoop AJ, Franks WT, Wylie BJ, Mullen C, Sandoz D, Rienstra CM (2007) Solid-state protein-structure determination with proton-detected triple-resonance 3D magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 46,8380–8383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhou DH, Nieuwkoop AJ, Berthold DA, Comellas G, Sperling LJ, Tang M, Shah GJ, Brea EJ, Lemkau LR, Rienstra CM (2012) Solid-state NMR analysis of membrane proteins and protein aggregates by proton detected spectroscopy. J Biomol NMR 54,291–305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Verel R, Ernst M, Meier BH (2001) Adiabatic dipolar recoupling in solid-state NMR: the DREAM scheme. J Magn Reson 150,81–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Barbet-Massin E, Pell AJ, Jaudzems K, Franks WT, Retel JS, Kotelovica S, Akopjana I, Tars K, Emsley L, Oschkinat H, Lesage A, Pintacuda G (2013) Out-and-back 13C-13C scalar transfers in protein resonance assignment by proton-detected solid-state NMR under ultra-fast MAS. J Biomol NMR 56,379–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Asami S, Reif B (2012) Assignment strategies for aliphatic protons in the solid-state in randomly protonated proteins. J Biomol NMR 52,31–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hennig M, Bermel W, Schwalbe H, Griesinger C (2000) Determination of psi torsion angle restraints from 3J(Cα,Cα) and 3J(Cα,H-N) coupling constants in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 122,6268–6277 [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Andreas LB, Le Marchand T, Jaudzems K, Pintacuda G (2015) High-resolution proton-detected NMR of proteins at very fast MAS. J Magn Reson 253,36–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lange A, Luca S, Baldus M (2002) Structural constraints from proton-mediated rare-spin correlation spectroscopy in rotating solids. J Am Chem Soc 124,9704–9705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Reif B, van Rossum BJ, Castellani F, Rehbein K, Diehl A, Oschkinat H (2003) Characterization of 1H−1H distances in a uniformly 2H,15N-labeled SH3 domain by MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 125,1488–1489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Linser R, Bardiaux B, Higman V, Fink U, Reif B (2011) Structure calculation from unambiguous long-range amide and methyl 1H-1H distance restraints for a microcrystalline protein with MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 133,5905–5912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Paulson EK, Morcombe CR, Gaponenko V, Dancheck B, Byrd RA, Zilm KW (2003) High-sensitivity observation of dipolar exchange and NOEs between exchangeable protons in proteins by 3D solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 125,14222–14223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Knight MJ, Webber AL, Pell AJ, Guerry P, Barbet-Massin E, Bertini I, Felli IC, Gonnelli L, Pierattelli R, Emsley L, Lesage A, Herrmann T, Pintacuda G (2011) Fast resonance assignment and fold determination of human superoxide dismutase by high-resolution proton-detected solid-state MAS NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 50,11697–11701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Andreas LB, Reese M, Eddy MT, Gelev V, Ni QZ, Miller EA, Emsley L, Pintacuda G, Chou JJ, Griffin RG (2015) Structure and mechanism of the influenza A M2(18–60) dimer of dimers. J Am Chem Soc 137,14877–14886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sharma Y, Kwon OY, Brooks B, Tjandra N (2002) An ab initio study of amide proton shift tensor dependence on local protein structure. J Am Chem Soc 124,327–335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wu G, Freure CJ, Verdurand E (1998) Proton chemical shift tensors and hydrogen bond geometry:  A 1H−2H dipolar NMR study of the water molecule in crystalline hydrates. J Am Chem Soc 120,13187–13193 [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Brouwer DH, Ripmeester JA (2007) Symmetry-based recoupling of proton chemical shift anisotropies in ultrahigh-field solid-state NMR. J Magn Reson 185,173–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Duma L, Abergel D, Tekely P, Bodenhausen G (2008) Proton chemical shift anisotropy measurements of hydrogen-bonded functional groups by fast magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Chem Commun (Camb) 2361–2363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hou G, Paramasivam S, Yan S, Polenova T, Vega AJ (2013) Multidimensional magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy for site-resolved measurement of proton chemical shift anisotropy in biological solids. J Am Chem Soc 135,1358–1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Hou G, Gupta R, Polenova T, Vega AJ (2014) A magic-angle spinning NMR method for the site-specific measurement of proton chemical-shift anisotropy in biological and organic solids. Isr J Chem 54,171–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Loth K, Pelupessy P, Bodenhausen G (2005) Chemical shift anisotropy tensors of carbonyl, nitrogen, and amide proton nuclei in proteins through cross-correlated relaxation in NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 127,6062–6068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yao L, Grishaev A, Cornilescu G, Bax A (2010) The impact of hydrogen bonding on amide 1H chemical shift anisotropy studied by cross-correlated relaxation and liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132,10866–10875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Cornilescu G, Bax A (2000) Measurement of proton, nitrogen, and carbonyl chemical shielding anisotropies in a protein dissolved in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 122,10143–10154 [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Goldman M (1984) Interference effects in the relaxation of a pair of unlike spin-1/2 nuclei. J Magn Reson 60,437–452 [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Lewandowski JR (2013) Advances in solid-state relaxation methodology for probing site-specific protein dynamics. Accounts Chem Res 46,2018–2027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Tollinger M, Sivertsen AC, Meier BH, Ernst M, Schanda P (2012) Site-resolved measurement of microsecond-to-millisecond conformational-exchange processes in proteins by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 134,14800–14807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Knight MJ, Pell AJ, Bertini I, Felli IC, Gonnelli L, Pierattelli R, Herrmann T, Emsley L, Pintacuda G (2012) Structure and backbone dynamics of a microcrystalline metalloprotein by solid-state NMR. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109,11095–11100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Ma PX, Haller JD, Zajakala J, Macek P, Sivertsen AC, Willbold D, Boisbouvier J, Schanda P (2014) Probing transient conformational states of proteins by solid-state R relaxation-dispersion NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 53,4312–4317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lewandowski JR, Sass HJ, Grzesiek S, Blackledge M, Emsley L (2011) Site-specific measurement of slow motions in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 133,16762–16765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lewandowski JR, Sein J, Sass HJ, Grzesiek S, Blackledge M, Emsley L (2010) Measurement of site-specific 13C spin-lattice relaxation in a crystalline protein. J Am Chem Soc 132,8252–8254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Schanda P, Meier BH, Ernst M (2010) Quantitative analysis of protein backbone dynamics in microcrystalline ubiquitin by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132,15957–15967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Dannatt HRW, Felletti M, Jehle S, Wang Y, Emsley L, Dixon NE, Lesage A, Pintacuda G (2016) Weak and transient protein interactions determined by solid-state NMR. Angew Chem Int Ed 55,6637–6640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Ishima R (2014) A probe to monitor performance of 15N longitudinal relaxation experiments for proteins in solution. J Biomol NMR 58,113–122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Su XC, Otting G (2010) Paramagnetic labelling of proteins and oligonucleotides for NMR. J Biomol NMR 46,101–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Otting G (2010) Protein NMR using paramagnetic ions. Annu Rev Biophys 39,387–405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Balayssac S, Bertini I, Lelli M, Luchinat C, Maletta M (2007) Paramagnetic ions provide structural restraints in solid-state NMR of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 129,2218–2219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Jahnke W (2002) Spin labels as a tool to identify and characterize protein-ligand interactions by NMR spectroscopy. Chembiochem 3,167–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Banci L, Bertini I, Luchinat C, Mori M (2010) NMR in structural proteomics and beyond. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 56,247–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Bertini I, Bhaumik A, De Paepe G, Griffin RG, Lelli M, Lewandowski JR, Luchinat C (2010) High-resolution solid-state NMR structure of a 17.6 kDa protein. J Am Chem Soc 132,1032–1040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Sengupta I, Nadaud PS, Helmus JJ, Schwieters CD, Jaroniec CP (2012) Protein fold determined by paramagnetic magic-angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nat Chem 4,410–417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bertini I, Emsley L, Lelli M, Luchinat C, Mao J, Pintacuda G (2010) Ultrafast MAS solid-state NMR permits extensive 13C and 1H detection in paramagnetic metalloproteins. J Am Chem Soc 132,5558–5559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Knight MJ, Felli IC, Pierattelli R, Emsley L, Pintacuda G (2013) Magic angle spinning NMR of paramagnetic proteins. Accounts Chem Res 46,2108–2116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Knight MJ, Felli IC, Pierattelli R, Bertini I, Emsley L, Herrmann T, Pintacuda G (2012) Rapid measurement of pseudocontact shifts in metalloproteins by proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 134,14730–14733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Rovo P, Grohe K, Giller K, Becker S, Linser R (2015) Proton transverse relaxation as a sensitive probe for structure determination in solid proteins. Chemphyschem 16,3791–3796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ashbrook SE (2009) Recent advances in solid-state NMR spectroscopy of quadrupolar nuclei. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11,6892–6905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Frydman L, Harwood JS (1995) Isotropic spectra of half-integer quadrupolar spins from bidimensional magic-angle spinning NMR. J Am Chem Soc 117,5367–5368 [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wang SH, De Paul SM, Bull LM (1997) High-resolution heteronuclear correlation between quadrupolar and spin-1/2 nuclei using multiple-quantum magic-angle spinning. J Magn Reson 125,364–368 [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Gan Z (2000) Isotropic NMR spectra of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei using satellite transitions and magic-angle spinning. J Am Chem Soc 122,3242–3243 [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Thrippleton MJ, Ball TJ, Steuernagel S, Ashbrook SE, Wimperis S (2006) STARTMAS: A MAS-based method for acquiring isotropic NMR spectra of spin I = 3/2 nuclei in real time. Chem Phys Lett 431,390–396 [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Meiboom S, Gill D (1958) Modified spin‐echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 29,688–691 [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Carr HY, Purcell EM (1954) Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 94,630–638 [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kupce E, Freeman R (1995) Adiabatic pulses for wide-band inversion and broad-band decoupling. J Magn Reson Ser A 115,273–276 [Google Scholar]
  • 154.O’Dell LA, Rossini AJ, Schurko RW (2009) Acquisition of ultra-wideline NMR spectra from quadrupolar nuclei by frequency stepped WURST–QCPMG. Chem Phys Lett 468,330–335 [Google Scholar]
  • 155.O’Dell LA, Schurko RW (2008) QCPMG using adiabatic pulses for faster acquisition of ultra-wideline NMR spectra. Chem Phys Lett 464,97–102 [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Palmer AG, Williams J, McDermott A (1996) Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of biopolymer dynamics. J Phys Chem A 100,13293–13310 [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Wu G (2016) An approximate analytical expression for the nuclear quadrupole transverse relaxation rate of half-integer spins in liquids. J Magn Reson 269,176–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Zhu J, Wu G (2011) Quadrupole central transition 17O NMR spectroscopy of biological macromolecules in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 133,920–932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Butler A, Eckert H (1989) Vanadium-51 NMR as a probe of vanadium(V) coorination to human apotransferrin. J Am Chem Soc 111,2802–2809 [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Germann MW, Aramini JM, Vogel HJ (1994) Quadrupolar metal ion NMR study of ovotransferrin at 17.6 T. J Am Chem Soc 116,6971–6972 [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Sasakawa H, Sakata E, Yamaguchi Y, Masuda M, Mori T, Kurimoto E, Iguchi T, Hisanaga SI, Iwatsubo T, Hasegawa M, Kato K (2007) Ultra-high field NMR studies of antibody binding and site-specific phosphorylation of alpha-synuclein. Biochem Bioph Res Co 363,795–799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Yamaguchi Y, Hanashima S, Yagi H, Takahashi Y, Sasakawa H, Kurimoto E, Iguchi T, Kon S, Uede T, Kato K (2010) NMR characterization of intramolecular interaction of osteopontin, an intrinsically disordered protein with cryptic integrin-binding motifs. Biochem Bioph Res Co 393,487–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Blundell CD, Reed MAC, Overduin M, Almond A (2006) NMR spectra of oligosaccharides at ultra-high field (900 MHz) have better resolution than expected due to favourable molecular tumbling. Carbohyd Res 341,1985–1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Park TJ, Kim JS, Ahn HC, Kim Y (2011) Solution and solid-state NMR structural studies of antimicrobial peptides LPcin-I and LPcin-II. Biophys J 101,1193–1201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Quinn CM, Polenova T (2017) Structural biology of supramolecular assemblies by magic-angle spinning NMR spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys 50, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Morag O, Sgourakis NG, Baker D, Goldbourt A (2015) The NMR-Rosetta capsid model of M13 bacteriophage reveals a quadrupled hydrophobic packing epitope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112,971–976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Kaplan M, Pinto C, Houben K, Baldus M (2016) Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) applied to membrane–protein complexes. Q Rev Biophys 49, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Karamanos TK, Kalverda AP, Thompson GS, Radford SE (2015) Mechanisms of amyloid formation revealed by solution NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 88–89,86–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Tycko R (2014) Physical and structural basis for polymorphism in amyloid fibrils. Protein Sci 23,1528–1539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Meyer NH, Zangger K (2014) Enhancing the resolution of multi-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectra of intrinsically disordered proteins by homonuclear broadband decoupling. Chem Commun 50,1488–1490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Banci L, Barbieri L, Bertini I, Luchinat E, Secci E, Zhao YG, Aricescu AR (2013) Atomic-resolution monitoring of protein maturation in live human cells by NMR. Nat Chem Biol 9,297–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Shishovs M, Rumnieks J, Diebolder C, Jaudzems K, Andreas LB, Stanek J, Kazaks A, Kotelovica S, Akopjana I, Pintacuda G, Koning RI, Tars K (2016) Structure of AP205 coat protein reveals circular permutation in ssRNA bacteriophages. J Mol Biol 428,4267–4279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Holsinger LJ, Lamb RA (1991) Influenza virus-M2 integral membrane-protein is a homotetramer stabilized by formation of disulfide bonds. Virology 183,32–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Pinto LH, Holsinger LJ, Lamb RA (1992) Influenza-virus M2 protein has ion channel activity. Cell 69,517–528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Barbet-Massin E, Felletti M, Schneider R, Jehle S, Communie G, Martinez N, Jensen MR, Ruigrok RW, Emsley L, Lesage A, Blackledge M, Pintacuda G (2014) Insights into the structure and dynamics of measles virus nucleocapsids by 1H-detected solid-state NMR. Biophys J 107,941–946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Luchinat E, Banci L (2016) A unique tool for cellular structural biology: in-cell NMR. J Biol Chem 291,3776–3784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ikeya T, Hanashima T, Hosoya S, Shimazaki M, Ikeda S, Mishima M, Guntert P, Ito Y (2016) Improved in-cell structure determination of proteins at near-physiological concentration. Sci Rep 6,38312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Pan BB, Yang F, Ye Y, Wu Q, Li C, Huber T, Su XC (2016) 3D structure determination of a protein in living cells using paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy. Chem Commun (Camb) 52,10237–10240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Theillet FX, Binolfi A, Bekei B, Martorana A, Rose HM, Stuiver M, Verzini S, Lorenz D, van Rossum M, Goldfarb D, Selenko P (2016) Structural disorder of monomeric alpha-synuclein persists in mammalian cells. Nature 530,45–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Bhunia A, Bhattacharjya S, Chatterjee S (2012) Applications of saturation transfer difference NMR in biological systems. Drug Discov Today 17,505–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Romaniuk JAH, Cegelski L (2015) Bacterial cell wall composition and the influence of antibiotics by cell-wall and whole-cell NMR. Philos T R Soc B 370, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Arnold AA, Genard B, Zito F, Tremblay R, Warschawski DE, Marcotte I (2015) Identification of lipid and saccharide constituents of whole microalgal cells by 13C solid-state NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta 1848,369–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Coen M, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Nicholson JK (2008) NMR-based metabolic profiling and metabonomic approaches to problems in molecular toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol 21,9–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Vogel EP, Curtis-Fisk J, Young KM, Weliky DP (2011) Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of human immunodeficiency virus gp41 protein that includes the fusion peptide: NMR detection of recombinant Fgp41 in inclusion bodies in whole bacterial cells and structural characterization of purified and membrane-associated Fgp41. Biochemistry-US 50,10013–10026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Vogel EP, Weliky DP (2013) Quantitation of recombinant protein in whole cells and cell extracts via solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry-US 52,4285–4287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Curtis-Fisk J, Spencer RM, Weliky DP (2008) Native conformation at specific residues in recombinant inclusion body protein in whole cells determined with solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 130,12568–12569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Sharif S, Kim SJ, Labischinski H, Schaefer J (2009) Characterization of peptidoglycan in fem-deletion mutants of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by solid-state NMR. Biochemistry-US 48,3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Cegelski L, Steuber D, Mehta AK, Kulp DW, Axelsen PH, Schaefer J (2006) Conformational and quantitative characterization of oritavancin-peptidoglycan complexes in whole cells of Staphylococcus aureus by in vivo 13C and 15N labeling. J Mol Biol 357,1253–1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Kim SJ, Matsuoka S, Patti GJ, Schaefer J (2008) Vancomycin derivative with damaged D-Ala-D-Ala binding cleft binds to cross-linked peptidoglycan in the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry-US 47,3822–3831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Mroue KH, Nishiyama Y, Pandey MK, Gong B, McNerny E, Kohn DH, Morris MD, Ramamoorthy A (2015) Proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy of bone with ultrafast magic angle spinning. Sci Rep 5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Laurencin D, Wong A, Dupree R, Smith ME (2008) Natural abundance 43Ca solid-state NMR characterisation of hydroxyapatite: identification of the two calcium sites. Magn Reson Chem 46,347–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Xu J, Zhu P, Gan Z, Sahar N, Tecklenburg M, Morris MD, Kohn DH, Ramamoorthy A (2010) Natural-abundance 43Ca solid-state NMR spectroscopy of bone. J Am Chem Soc 132,11504–11509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Laurencin D, Wong A, Chrzanowski W, Knowles JC, Qiu D, Pickup DM, Newport RJ, Gan Z, Duer MJ, Smith ME (2010) Probing the calcium and sodium local environment in bones and teeth using multinuclear solid state NMR and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12,1081–1091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ravera E, Cerofolini L, Martelli T, Louka A, Fragai M, Luchinat C (2016) 1H-detected solid-state NMR of proteins entrapped in bioinspired silica: a new tool for biomaterials characterization. Sci Rep 6,27851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Ravera E, Martelli T, Geiger Y, Fragai M, Goobes G, Luchinat C (2016) Biosilica and bioinspired silica studied by solid-state NMR. Coord Chem Rev 327–328,110–122 [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Fragai M, Luchinat C, Martelli T, Ravera E, Sagi I, Solomonov I, Udi Y (2014) SSNMR of biosilica-entrapped enzymes permits an easy assessment of preservation of native conformation in atomic detail. Chem Commun 50,421–423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Bozarth A, Maier UG, Zauner S (2009) Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82,195–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Brunner E, Groger C, Lutz K, Richthammer P, Spinde K, Sumper M (2009) Analytical studies of silica biomineralization: towards an understanding of silica processing by diatoms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84,607–616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES