Abstract
Although the majority of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients are labeled sporadic, multiple genetic risk variants have been identified, the most powerful and prevalent of which is the e4 variant of the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene. Here, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of a clinically diagnosed AD patient [ASUi005-A] and a non-demented control (NDC) patient [ASUi006-A] homozygous for the APOE4 risk allele. These hiPSCs maintained their original genotype, expressed pluripotency markers, exhibited a normal karyotype, and retained the ability to differentiate into cells representative of the three germ layers.
Resource table.
| Unique stem cell lines identifier | ASUi005-A ASUi006-A |
| Alternative names of stem cell lines | ASU-161 ASU-487 |
| Institution | Arizona State University; Tempe, AZ; USA |
| Contact information of distributor | David Brafman, David.Brafman@asu.edu |
| Type of cell lines | iPSC |
| Origin | Human |
| Cell source | Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) |
| Clonality | Clonal |
| Method of reprogramming | CytoTune®-iPS 2.0 Reprogramming System |
| Multiline rationale | Age-matched Alzheimer's disease and non-demented control hiPSC lines homozygous for the APOE 4 risk factor |
| Gene modification | No |
| Type of modification | N/A |
| Associated disease | Alzheimer's disease |
| Gene/locus | Apolipoprotein E (APOE) |
| Method of modification | N/A |
| Name of transgene or resistance | N/A |
| Inducible/constitutive system | N/A |
| Date archived/stock date | March 2018 |
| Cell line repository/bank | Not applicable |
| Ethical approval | Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board; IRB # 15-008674 |
Resource utility
Polymorphisms in the Apolipoprotein (APOE) gene have been identified as the most prevalent of the risk factors associated with sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD). As such, hiPSCs with various APOE genotypes will provide a valuable resource to study the mechanisms by which this risk factor contributes to AD onset and progression.
Resource details
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) studies have identified several risk factors associated with increased probability of sporadic Alzheimer's disease (SAD) onset (Bettens et al., 2010). Of these risk factors, polymorphism in the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, a lipoprotein transporter involved in cholesterol metabolism, is the strongest and most prevalent (Hauser & Ryan, 2013). Compared to individuals with an APOE e3/3 genotype (referred to as the ‘risk neutral’ allele), heterozygosity for the e4 allele increases AD risk by 3 fold, and homozygosity for the e4 allele increases risk up to 12 fold (Wolf et al., 2013). In this study, we report the generation of hiPSCs from two individuals from the Arizona APOE Cohort (for which recruitment and enrolment strategies have been described previously (Caselli et al., 2011)) that are homozygous for the APOE e4 allele— a clinically diagnosed AD patient (ASUi005-A, Mini-Mental Status Exam [MMSE] score = Patient too advanced to collect data.) who fulfilled published diagnostic criteria (McKhann et al., 2011) and an age-matched non-demented control patient (NDC; ASUi006-A, MMSE score = 29) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of lines.
| iPSC line names | Abbreviation in figures | Gender | Age | Ethnicity | Genotype of locus | Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUi005-A | 005 | M | 87 | N/A | APOE: 112R/158R | Alzheimer's disease |
| ASUi006-A | 006 | F | 86 | N/A | APOE: 112R/158R | Healthy/Non-Demented |
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were reprogrammed into hiPSCs using the non-integrating CytoTune®-iPS 2.0 Reprogramming System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Several clones from each patient were isolated, expanded, and characterized by karyotyping and flow cytometry. One clone was expanded and fully characterized for each line (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The expanded hiPSC clones displayed a typical pluripotent stem cell morphology (Fig. 1A). All expanded clones were confirmed to be negative for mycoplasma (Supplementary Table 1). Sequencing analysis of the hiPSCs at the APOE gene in exon 4 confirm homozygosity at the e4 allele, identical to the parental PBMCs [Fig. 1B; Note: Human APOE has three major isoforms, ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4, which differ by two amino acid substitutions at residues 112 and 158 in exon 4—ApoE2 (Cys112, Cys158), ApoE3 (Cys112, Arg158), ApoE4 (Arg112, Arg158)]. Expanded clones maintained a normal euploid karyotype (Fig. 1C). Immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 1D) and flow cytometry (Fig. 1E) revealed that the hiPSCs expressed high levels of pluripotency-associated markers NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, and SSEA-4. Absence of viral transgenes in expanded clones was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 1F). Finally, to verify pluripotency, hiPSCs were spontaneously differentiated in vitro through embryoid body (EB) formation. Immunofluorescence (Fig. 1G) and gene expression analysis (Fig. 1H) of EBs revealed downregulation of pluripotency-associated markers (OCT4, NANOG, SOX2) and upregulation of genes associated with endoderm (AFP, SOX17), mesoderm (ACTC1, ISL1, SMA, TBX3), and ectoderm (B3T, MAP2, NCAM, PAX6).
Fig. 1.
(A) Phase contrast images of hiPSC lines. (B) Sanger sequencing showing maintenance of genotype at ApoE locus. (C) Karyotyping confirmed cells maintained a normal euploid karyotype. (D-E) Immunofluorescent and flow cytometry analysis of pluripotency markers (NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, SSEA4). (F) RT-PCR demonstrates absence of SeV vector. SeV infected fibroblasts were used as a positive control. (G) Immunofluorescent staining and (H) gene expression analysis of in vitro differentiated cells shows expression of markers associated with endoderm (AFP, SOX17), mesoderm (ACTC1, ISL1, SMA, TBX3), and ectoderm (B3T, MAP2, NCAM, PAX6).
Table 2.
Characterization and validation.
| Classification | Test | Result | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphology | Photography | Normal | Fig. 1 A |
| Phenotype | Qualitative analysis: Immunocytochemistry | Positive staining for OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2 | Fig. 1D |
| Quantitative analysis: Flow cytometry | OCT4/SSEA-4 Double Positive > 95% | Fig. 1E | |
| Genotype | Karyotype (G-banding) and resolution | 46XY (ASUi005-A) 46XX (ASUi006-A) Resolution 450–550 |
Fig. 1C |
| Identity | Microsatellite PCR (mPCR) | Not performed | |
| STR analysis | 16 Loci All matched | Available with the authors | |
| Mutation analysis | Sequencing Southern Blot OR WGS |
Homozygous for Apolipoprotein e4 risk variant Not performed |
Fig. 1B |
| Microbiology and virology | Mycoplasma | Mycoplasma testing by luminescence. Negative |
Supplementary Table 1 |
| Differentiation potential | Embryoid body | Endoderm (AFP, SOX17), mesoderm (ACTC1, ISL1, NKX2.5, TBX3, SMA), and ectoderm (B3T, NCAM, PAX6, MAP2) | Fig. 1G and H |
| Donor screening (OPTIONAL) | HIV 1+2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C | Not performed | |
| Genotype additional info | Blood group genotyping | Not performed | |
| (OPTIONAL) | HLA tissue typing | Not performed |
Materials and methods
Reprogramming of PBMCs
Peripheral blood samples were collected in BD Vacutainer cell preparation tubes and centrifuged for 30 min at 1800 RCF. Isolated PBMCs were cultured in expansion medium (EM; QBSF-60 [Fisher Scientific] supplemented with 100 μg/mL Primocin [Fisher Scientific], 1% penicillin/streptomycin [Thermo Fisher], 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid [Sigma], 50 ng/mL SCF [R&D], 10 ng/mL IL-3 [R&D], 2 U/mL EPO [R& D], 40 ng/mL IGF-1 [R&D], 1 μM Dexamethasone [Sigma]). After 9–12 days of expansion, 2.5 × 105 PBMCs were resuspended in EM and transferred to a 12 well plate. Sendai viruses (SeV; CytoTune®-iPS 2.0 Reprogramming Kit [Thermo Fisher]) were added at a multiplicity of infection MOI of 10:10:6 for the hKOS:c-Myc:Klf4 Sendai viruses. Three days after transduction, cells were cultured on hESC-qualified Matrigel® (Corning) in TeSR-E7 medium for 7 days, and then switched to TeSR-E8 (E8) medium (STEMCELL Technologies). After 21 days, individual hiPSC colonies were mechanically isolated and expanded in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. After mechanically passaging for the first 3 passages, hiPSCs were non-enzymatically passaged using ReLeSR™ (STEMCELL Technologies) at a split ratio of 1:4–1:6 and cryopreserved. For routine passaging of these lines, Versene was used at a split ratio of 1:6 with 5 μM Rho kinase inhibitor (Y-27632; Biogems). Mycoplasma testing was performed with the MycoAlert PLUS kit (Lonza) and the Lucetta™ Luminometer (Lonza).
Quantitative RT-PCR (QPCR)
RNA was isolated from cells (NucleoSpin RNA Kit, Clontech) and reverse transcription was performed (iScript RT Supermix, Bio-Rad). QPCR was carried out using SYBR green dye on a CFX384 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System. QPCR experiments run with SYBR green dye were carried out using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). For qPCR experiments run with SYBR green dye, a 2 min gradient to 95 °C followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s was used. Primer sequences are provided in Table 3. Gene expression was normalized to 18S rRNA levels. Relative fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2 – AACt method.
Table 3.
Reagent details.
| Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | Dilution | Company Cat # and RRID | |
| Pluripotency markers | Mouse anti-OCT4 | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-5279 RRID: 628051 |
| Mouse anti-NANOG | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-293121 RRID: 10548762 | |
| Goat anti-SOX2 | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-17320 RRID: 2286684 | |
| Mouse IgG1 anti-OCT4-PE | 1:10 | BD Biosciences, Cat# 560186 RRID: 1645331 | |
| Mouse IgG3 anti-SSEA4-APC | 1:10 | R&D Systems, Cat# FAB1435A RRID: 494994 | |
| Differentiation markers | Rabbit anti-AFP | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-15375 RRID: 2223935 |
| Mouse-anti SMA | 1:50 | Santa Cruz, Cat# sc-53015 RRID: 628683 | |
| Mouse anti-B3T | 1:100 | Fitzgerald, Cat# 10R-T136A RRID: 1289248 | |
| Secondary antibodies | Alexa 488 Donkey anti-goat IgG | 1:200 | Thermo Fischer, Cat# A11055 RRID: 2534102 |
| Alexa 647 Donkey anti-mouse IgG | 1:200 | Thermo Fisher, Cat# A31571 RRID: 162542 | |
| Alexa 488 Donkey anti-rabbit IgG | 1:200 | Thermo Fisher, Cat# A21206 RRID: 141708 | |
| Isotype control | Mouse IgG1-PE | 1:10 | BD Biosciences, Cat# 559320 RRID: 397218 |
| Mouse IgG1-APC | 1:10 | R&D Systems, Cat# IC007A RRID: 952035 | |
| Primers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Product size (bp) | Forward/Reverse primer (5′-30′ | |
| SeV Transgene (RT-PCR) | SeV | 181 | GGATCACTAGGTGATATCGAGC |
| ACCAGACAAGAGTTTAAGAGATATGTATC | |||
| Pluripotency markers (qPCR) | NANOG | 183 | CAATGGTGTGACGCAGGGAT |
| GGACTGTTCCAGGCCTGATT | |||
| OCT4 | 164 | CAAAGCAGAAACCCTCGTGC | |
| CTCGGACCACATCCTTCTCG | |||
| SOX2 | 123 | GGATAAGTACACGCTGCCCG | |
| ATGTGCGCGTAACTGTCCAT | |||
| Germ layer markers (qPCR) | ACTC1 | 179 | GTACCCTGGTATTGCTGATCG |
| CCTCATCGTACTCTTGCTTGCT | |||
| AFP | 301 | AGAGTTGCTAAAGGATACCAGGA | |
| AGGCCAATAGTTTGTCCTCAC | |||
| ISL1 | 135 | GGATTTGGAATGGCATGCGG | |
| CATTTGATCCCGTACAACCTGA | |||
| MAP2 | 111 | CCAGTTTCTGCGCCCAGATTT | |
| AGCTCCCAATCAATGCTTCCT | |||
| NCAM | 77 | AGACCCCATTCCCTCCATCA | |
| TGTGCCCATCCAGAGTCTTT | |||
| NKX2.5 | 149 | GAGCCGAAAAGAAAGCCTGAA | |
| CACCGACACGTCTCACTCAG | |||
| SOX17 | 100 | GAATCCAGACCTGCACAACG | |
| CTCTGCCTCCTCCACGAAG | |||
| TBX3 | 212 | ATTTCACAATTCTCGGTGGA | |
| TATAATTCCCCTGCCACGTA | |||
| PAX6 | 100 | CTTCGCTAATGGGCCAGTGA | |
| TCAGATTCCTATGCTGATTGGTGA | |||
| Housekeeping gene (qPCR) | 18s | 150 | GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT |
| CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG | |||
| Genotyping (PCR) | APOE | 244 | TAAGCTTGGCACGGCTGTCCAAGGA |
| ACAGAATTGGCCCCGGCCTGGTACAC | |||
SeV detection
After a minimum of 10 passages, RNA was isolated from cells (NucleoSpin RNA Kit, Clontech) and reverse transcription was performed (iScript RT Supermix, Bio-Rad). RT-PCR was run on a Bio-Rad CFX384 Real-Time System with the primers listed in Table 3 and the following cycling parameters—a 2 min gradient to 95 °C followed by 20 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The resulting products were then run on a 1% gel.
APOE genotyping
For APOE genotyping via Sanger sequencing, genomic DNA was isolated from cells using the DNeasy kit (Qiagen). PCR was performed on a MultiGene OptiMax thermal cycler with the primers list in Table 3 and the following cycling parameters—30 s at 98 °C followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 62 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The resulting PCR product was cleaned up using the PureLink™ PCR Purification Kit (ThermoFisher). Sanger sequencing was performed on PCR products (ASU CLAS Genomics Facility) uses Big Dye V3.1 chemistry with samples processed using an Applied Biosystems 3730XL Sequence Analysis Instrument.
Karyotyping and STR analysis
Cytogenetic analysis was performed using standard protocols for G-banding (Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories). For ASUi005-A, cells were tested at passage 10, 20 metaphase cells were counted, and 4 cells were karyotyped. For ASUi006-A, cells were tested at passage 8, 20 metaphase cells were counted, and 3 cells were karyotyped. Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis was performed with Promega's PowerPlex® 16 multiplex STR system (Cell Line Genetics). The following loci were tested: Amelogenin, CSF1PO, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D21S11, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, FGA, Penta D, Penta E, THO1, TPOX, vWA.
Flow cytometry
Cells were dissociated with Accutase for 10 min at 37 °C, triturated, and passed through a 40 μm cell strainer. Cells were then washed twice with stain buffer (BD Biosciences) and resuspended at a maximum concentration of 5 × 106 cells per 100 μL. Cells were fixed for 30 min at RT with BD Cytofix Fixation Buffer (BD Biosciences). The cells were then washed twice with stain buffer and permeabilized with BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) for 30 min on ice. Cells were then washed twice with stain buffer. Antibodies were added at the dilution indicated in Table 3 in 100 μL of cell suspension. Cells were stained with primary antibodies for 1 h on ice, washed, and resuspended in stain buffer. Cells were analyzed by an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Gates were determined using isotype only controls.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were gently washed twice with PBS prior to fixation. Cells were then fixed for 20 min at room temperature (RT) with BD Cytofix Fixation Buffer (BD Biosciences). Cells were then washed twice with PBS and permeabilized with BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4OC. Cells were then washed twice with PBS. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C and then washed twice with PBS at RT. Secondary antibodies were incubated at RT for 1 h. Antibodies and the concentrations that were used are listed in Table 3. Nucleic acids were stained for DNA with Hoechst 33342 (2 μg/mL; ThermoFisher) for 10 min at RT and then washed twice with PBS. Imaging was performed using an EVOS FL Cell Imaging System (ThermoFisher).
In vitro embryoid body (EB) formation
HiPSCs were harvested using ReLeSR™ (StemCell Technologies) and plated on low attachment plates in E8 medium. The following day, the media was changed to differentiation medium (DM; DMEM/F12, 20% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep). After 5 days, EBs were plated on Matrigel-coated plates and cultured with DM. After 14 days, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for germ layer markers. In addition, cells were dissociated using Accutase, RNA was isolated (as described above for qPCR), and qPCR was performed (as described above for qPCR) to assess expression of pluripotency and germ layer markers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NIH (5R21AG056706-02), an ASU-Mayo Seed Grant (FP00004591) and the Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Consortium.
Footnotes
Author disclosure statement
There authors declare no competing financial interests in this study.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2018.09.007.
References
- Bettens K, Sleegers K, Van Broeckhoven C, 2010. Current status on Alzheimer disease molecular genetics: from past, to present, to future. Hum. Mol. Genet 19, R4–R11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caselli RJ, Dueck AC, Locke DE, Hoffman-Snyder CR, Woodruff BK, Rapcsak SZ, Reiman EM, 2011. Longitudinal modeling of frontal cognition in APOE epsilon4 homozygotes, heterozygotes, and noncarriers. Neurology 76, 1383–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauser PS, Ryan RO, 2013. Impact of apolipoprotein E on Alzheimer's disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res 10, 809–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr., Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH, 2011. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 263–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf AB, Valla J, Bu G, Kim J, Ladu MJ, Reiman EM, Caselli RJ, 2013. Apolipoprotein E as a beta-amyloid-independent factor in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther 5, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

