Abstract
Synaptic vesicles (SVs) transmit signals by releasing neurotransmitters from specialized synaptic regions of neurons. In the synaptic region, SVs are tightly clustered around small structures called active zones. The motor KIF1A transports SVs outward through axons until they are captured in the synaptic region. This transport must be guided in the forward direction because it is opposed by the dynein motor, which causes SVs to reverse direction multiple times en route. The core synapse stability (CSS) system contributes to both guided transport and capture of SVs. We identified Sentryn as a CSS protein that contributes to the synaptic localization of SVs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Like the CSS proteins SAD Kinase and SYD-2 (Liprin-α), Sentryn also prevents dynein-dependent accumulation of lysosomes in dendrites in strains lacking JIP3. Genetic analysis showed that Sentryn and SAD Kinase each have at least one nonoverlapping function for the stable accumulation of SVs at synapses that, when combined with their shared functions, enables most of the functions of SYD-2 (Liprin-α) for capturing SVs. Also like other CSS proteins, Sentryn appears enriched at active zones and contributes to active zone structure, suggesting that it is a novel, conserved active zone protein. Sentryn is recruited to active zones by a process dependent on the active zone-enriched CSS protein SYD-2 (Liprin-α). Our results define a specialized group of active zone enriched proteins that can affect motorized transport throughout the neuron and that have roles in both guided transport and capture of SVs.
Keywords: synaptic vesicle, Sentryn, SAD kinase, Liprin, axonal transport
NEURONS are distinguished from other cells by their complexity. Part of this complexity arises from the need to transport signaling vesicles known as synaptic vesicles (SVs) long distances through axons. Furthermore, after transport, neurons must ensure that SVs become captured in clusters in a specialized synaptic region, where synapses form. The synaptic region can be at a nonterminal or a terminal location in the axon, or it can be distributed throughout the axon as part a single process or branched axon processes (Nicholls 2012; Kandel 2013). The captured SVs cluster around small structures known as active zones—the sites where SVs ultimately fuse and release their neurotransmitter cargo (Sudhof 2012). Here, we identify what appears to be a new active zone-enriched protein named Sentryn. Our data suggest that Sentryn is a missing link in a sophisticated system that ensures the stable accumulation of SVs at synapses.
The cargo transport system of neurons uses a network of microtubule tracks and motors that exhibit intrinsic directionality. The microtubules have a plus and a minus end, and there are dedicated plus- and minus-end directed motors. The microtubules in axons are nearly uniformly oriented with their plus-ends pointing out (Burton and Paige 1981; Heidemann et al. 1981; Baas and Lin 2011). The plus-end directed (forward) motor KIF1A moves SVs from the cell soma to the synaptic region (Hall and Hedgecock 1991). The minus-end directed (reverse) motor dynein moves them in the opposite direction (Ou et al. 2010; Edwards et al. 2015b). During transport from the soma to the synaptic region, both the forward and reverse motors act on the same SVs, causing them to reverse direction multiple times en route (Wu et al. 2013; Edwards et al. 2015b). Although the significance of this bidirectional transport is unknown, its existence means that neurons must have a mechanism to ensure that KIF1A ultimately dominates, thus allowing optimal levels of SVs to reach the synaptic region. We refer to the process that ensures the dominance of forward transport as “guided transport.” Adding complexity, neurons must also have a mechanism to inhibit, block, or equalize the actions of both motors after guided axonal transport to enable SVs to become captured in the synaptic region. In other words, SVs must be protected from counter-productive motor activity both during and after transport.
The core synapse stability (CSS) system contributes to both the guided SV transport and the capture of SVs in the synaptic region. The CSS system is a group of proteins with shared functions in inhibiting the removal of cargos from axons (Edwards et al. 2015a; Miller 2017). The system includes at least three active zone-enriched proteins, SYD-2 (Liprin-α), SAD kinase, and SYD-1. Despite being enriched at active zones, CSS system proteins also affect transport at sites far removed from active zones, since they guide the outward transport of SVs (Miller et al. 2005; Wagner et al. 2009; Zheng et al. 2014; Edwards et al. 2015b). However, the same three proteins also have a post-transport function in the synaptic region near active zones. The synaptic region functions of SYD-2 (Liprin-α), SAD kinase, and SYD-1 were first discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans, when mutant analyses revealed defects in SV cluster formation and synapse assembly (Zhen and Jin 1999; Crump et al. 2001; Hallam et al. 2002; Dai et al. 2006; Patel et al. 2006). Later studies suggested that the role of these proteins in synapse assembly involved capturing SVs to clusters (Stigloher et al. 2011; Kittelmann et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2013; Edwards et al. 2015b). SYD-2 and SYD-1 also contribute to the structure of active zones, but are not required for active zone formation (Zhen and Jin 1999; Owald et al. 2010; Kittelmann et al. 2013).
The finding that CSS system proteins act together in the same neurons to regulate both the guided transport and capture of SVs suggests that these two processes may be coordinated or linked in some way, possibly through the regulation of motorized transport by a common set of proteins. However, the mechanism by which SV capture occurs is unknown, and past studies have focused more on a physical anchoring mechanism and less on the regulation of motorized transport. Fine filaments have been observed to interconnect SVs in electron tomograms and appear to anchor SVs directly or indirectly to the active zone (Landis et al. 1988; Siksou et al. 2007; Fernandez-Busnadiego et al. 2010; Stigloher et al. 2011). However, it is unclear whether the fine filaments serve mainly to protect SVs from diffusion or whether they are also sufficient to protect SVs from the strong forces of motors. Indeed, two recent studies in mice found that dual elimination of either RIM plus RIM-binding protein or ELKS plus RIM led to disassembly of the active zone/dense projection (DP) and eliminated clustering and priming (i.e., docking) of SVs (Acuna et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). However, in those double mutants, wild-type numbers of SVs were still captured at synapses (Acuna et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). This suggests that a capture mechanism not based on physical anchoring, such as motorized transport regulation, may significantly contribute to the captured state. Tethering may act primarily to reduce diffusion of SVs, as has been hypothesized (Landis et al. 1988), while motorized transport regulation may protect SVs from the strong forces of motors.
CSS system proteins can also inhibit the dynein-mediated clearance of lysosomes and early endosomes from axons, and can prevent lysosome accumulation in dendrites (Edwards et al. 2015a). However, this only occurs in genetic backgrounds lacking UNC-16 (JIP3). JIP3 is a large protein that appears conserved in all animals and that seems to have dual, mostly independent, functions as both a kinesin-1 adaptor and as a regulator of dynein’s organelle clearance function in axons (Miller 2017). The combined data from mice, zebrafish, and C. elegans suggest that, in the absence of JIP3, the CSS system gains access to lysosomes and early endosomes, and inhibits their dynein-mediated clearance from axons (Miller 2017). The finding that the CSS system can, if given the opportunity, affect the transport of organelles was significant, because it suggests that the CSS system can regulate a cargo transport system that is shared by some organelles as well as SVs. It also provided further evidence that the CSS system can affect transport throughout the neuron, including in dendrites and early segments of the axon, and not just at its sites of enrichment.
Recently, evidence has emerged that the CSS system also regulates the transport and capture of dense core vesicles (DCVs). DCVs mediate the regulated secretion of neuropeptides (Sossin and Scheller 1991; Levitan 2008). Unlike SVs, DCVs are not clustered around active zones, nor are they clustered tightly together with each other in the synaptic region (Weimer et al. 2006; Hammarlund et al. 2008; Hoover et al. 2014). Two separate studies found that C. elegans syd-2 null mutants accumulate DCVs in cell somas and dendrites in a dynein-dependent manner and have reduced DCV levels in axons (Goodwin and Juo 2013; Edwards et al. 2015b). Despite not appearing to have a special relationship with active zones, DCVs were recently found to use the active zone-enriched CSS system proteins SAD kinase and SYD-2 (Liprin-α) for both guided transport and for capture, with DCV capture occurring in the same synaptic region as SV capture (Morrison et al. 2018). That study was the first identification of DCV capture proteins. The same study also discovered a role for a novel protein in DCV guided transport and capture. The new protein, which is conserved in all animals, was named Sentryn. Based on “sentry,” the name is a metaphor for its role in “standing guard” over captured DCVs and “protecting” them from counter-productive motor activity, both during transport and after capture.
Although Sentryn acts with known CSS system proteins in the guided transport and capture of DCVs (Morrison et al. 2018), it is unclear whether Sentryn is merely an adaptor that connects the CSS system specifically to the regulation of DCV motorized transport, or whether it is a new essential component of the CSS system in all contexts. In the current study, we show that, in most contexts, Sentryn is a component of the CSS system. Adding significance, Sentryn appears to be a new active zone protein, suggesting that it the first novel, conserved active zone protein to be discovered in over 11 years. We further show that both Sentryn and SAD kinase, like Liprin-α, contribute to the structure of the active zone, and that Sentryn is recruited to active zones by a process dependent on the active zone protein SYD-2 (Liprin-α). Finally, we show that CSS system proteins are functionally distinct from most other active zone proteins.
Materials and Methods
C. elegans culture and strains
Worm culture and manipulation essentially followed previously described methods (Brenner 1974; Sulston and Hodgkin 1988; Stiernagle 2006). Briefly, culture media was modified NGM (referred to as NGM-LOB) (Hoover et al. 2014). Prior studies defined the culture plate types “spread plates,” “streak plates,” “locomotion plates,” “24-well plates,” and “96-well solid media culture plates” (Miller et al. 1999; Edwards et al. 2008, 2015b). “96-well thrashing plates” were made similar to “96-well solid media culture plates” (Edwards et al. 2015b) except the media volume per well was 305 μl, and the wells were not seeded with bacteria. The “5 ml unseeded plates” were made by dispensing 5 ml of modified NGM into standard 60-mm Petri plates, allowing them to set overnight at room temperature lid-side-up, and storing unseeded at 4° until needed. The nonwild-type strains used in this study are listed in Supplemental Material, Table S1 in File S1. The relevant mutations present in the worm strains, along with the methods we used for genotyping them in crosses, are listed in Table S2 in File S1.
Targeted knockout of rimb-1 by CRISPR
We inserted the sequence GC TAG C TAA A TGA after codon 16 of the rimb-1 gene (out of 1276 codons total). The underlined sequence is a NheI site for snip-PCR screening (Paix et al. 2014). The insert contains three stop codons, each in a different reading frame (Paix et al. 2014). We used the oligonucleotide-templated coconversion strategy (Arribere et al. 2014), using dpy-10(cn64) as a coconversion marker, and screened for conversion by PCR followed by restriction digest.
We cloned the Cas9 target sequence CATGCCATAGGAGGATGCGG into the pJP118 gRNA expression cassette as previously described for cloning targeting sequences into pRB1017 (Arribere et al. 2014). pJP118 is a modified version of the published pRB1017 plasmid (Arribere et al. 2014). It contains a modified sgRNA (F + E), with an extended Cas9 binding structure and removes a potential Pol III terminator by an A–U base pair flip. The oligo template contained 50 bases of homology on each side of this insertion for 113 bases total. The oligo was ordered from Sigma at the 0.2 μmol scale with PAGE purification. The injection mixture was pDD162 (Cas9 plasmid; 50 ng/μl) (Dickinson et al. 2013), pJA58 (dpy-10 gRNA plasmid; 25 ng/μl) (Arribere et al. 2014), KG#843 (rimb-1 gRNA plasmid; 25 ng/μl), and the dpy-10(cn64) and rimb-1(ce828) oligo templates (500 and 2400 nM, respectively). We injected 36 wild-type animals with this mixture and cloned 48 F1 rollers, 47 of which yielded progeny. Of the 47 rollers, 34 (72%) showed successful edits, as indicated by NheI cleavage of a PCR product containing the insertion site.
Plasmids
Table S4 in File S1 lists all the plasmids used in this study along with sources and/or construction details. For the Gibson Assembly plasmid construction using NEBuilder, we followed the manufacturer’s instructions with the following options and modifications: (1) we designed primers with 30 bp of overlap, with all of the overlap on one of the two fragments to be combined; (2) we used 15 ng/μl as a starting template concentration for all PCR reactions, rather than the much lower concentration recommended by the manufacturer; (3) we performed the optional DpnI digestions, gel-purified the PCR fragments, and quantified them with a Nanodrop; (4) the assembly reaction contained 200 ng of the vector fragment and a threefold molar excess of each remaining fragment; (5) each reaction was performed in 10 μl total volume, starting with 5 μl frozen aliquots of 2× NEBuilder master mix; and (6) we directly transformed 2 μl of the reaction using electroporation. In all constructs involving the cloning of PCR fragments, we sequenced the inserts and used clones containing no mutations in the fragment of interest to make the final stock.
Production and integration of transgenes
We prepared plasmids for microinjection using the Qiagen Tip-20 system according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except that we added a 0.1 M potassium acetate/two volumes ethanol precipitation step after resuspending the isopropanol-precipitated pellet. We produced transgenic strains bearing extrachromosomal arrays by the method of Mello et al. (1991). For the strn-1(ok2975) and strn-1(ok296) rescue experiments for SV distribution phenotypes, the hosts were KG4787 strn-1(ok2975); wyIs85 and KG4943 strn-1(ok2996); wyIs85, respectively. For the strn-1(ok2975) rescue experiments for lysosome distribution phenotypes, the host was KG4750 unc-16(ce483); strn-1(ok2975) ceIs56. For all other injection experiments, N2 was the host. We used pBluescript carrier DNA to bring the final concentration of DNA in each injection mixture to 165–175 ng/μl. We integrated transgenes into the genome using 9100 Rads of gamma rays and screening for 100% transmittance of the cotransformation marker as described (Reynolds et al. 2005; Charlie et al. 2006). We mapped the insertion site of ceIs259 by crossing the integrant through CB4856, reisolating and cloning homozygous animals in the F2 generation, and using the resulting mapping lines to map the integration sites relative to SNPs as described (Schade et al. 2005). Table S3 in File S1 lists all the transgenes in this study, their DNA contents, and the injection concentration of each DNA.
Strain constructions
We constructed strains containing multiple mutations or transgenes using standard genetic methods (Edwards et al. 2015a,b). After making a strain composed of two or more mutations, or one or more mutations plus an integrated transgenic array insertion or an extrachromosomal array, we confirmed the homozygosity of each mutation using the genotyping methods described in Table S2 in File S1.
Light level imaging
File S1 describes the methods used for growth and mounting of strains for imaging, image acquisition and processing, quantitative image analysis, special imaging methods, and immunostaining of formaldehyde-fixed animals.
High-pressure freezing electron microscopy
Worms were prepared using high-pressure freeze (HPF) fixation as described previously (Weimer 2006). Briefly, young adult hermaphrodites were placed in specimen chambers filled with Escherichia coli and frozen at −180° and high pressure using a Leica SPF HPM 100. Freeze substitution was then performed on the frozen samples using a Leica Reichert AFS. Samples were held at −90° for 107 hr with 0.1% tannic acid and 2% OsO4 in anhydrous acetone. The temperature was increased at 5°/hr to −20°, kept at −20° for 14 hr, and increased by 10°/hr to 20°. After fixation, samples were infiltrated with 50% Epon/acetone for 4 hr, 90% Epon/acetone for 18 hr, and 100% Epon for 5 hr. Finally, samples were embedded in Epon and incubated for 48 hr at 65°. All specimens were prepared in the same fixation and subsequently blinded for genotype. Ultrathin (40 nm) serial sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut 6 and collected on formvar-covered, carbon-coated copper grids (EMS, FCF2010-Cu). Poststaining was performed using 2.5% aqueous uranyl acetate for 4 min, followed by Reynolds lead citrate for 2 min. Images were acquired starting at the anterior reflex of the gonad using a Jeol JEM-1220 transmission electron microscope operating at 80 kV. Micrographs were collected using a Gatan digital camera at a magnification of 100,000×. Images were taken of cross-sections of the dorsal cord of three animals for each strain. Cholinergic synapses were identified by morphology (White et al. 1986). A synapse was defined as a set of serial sections containing a DP and two flanking sections from both sides without DPs. SVs were identified as spherical, light gray structures with an average diameter of ∼30 nm. A SV was considered docked if it contacted the plasma membrane (e.g., distance to plasma membrane = 0 nm). Images were analyzed using NIH ImageJ software and macros provided by the Jorgensen lab. Serial images were aligned using TrakEM2 before annotating organelle structures in ImageJ. Analysis of these structures was performed using MATLAB scripts written by the Jorgensen laboratory and Ricardo Fleury.
Behavioral analysis
We performed swimming cycle assays using a modification of the originally described “Thrashing Assay” (Miller et al. 1996). To grow animals for the assay, we transferred 13 L2 stage larvae to each of four Locomotion Plates and cultured the plates at 20° for 5 2/3 days to produce F1 young adults that had never been starved. The day before the assay, we adjusted the assay area temperature to 22.5–23.5° and set the following items in this area: one “96-well thrashing assay plate” (see “C. elegans Culture and Strains”), three “5 ml unseeded plate” (see “C. elegans Culture and Strains”), a 2 liter bottle of M9 with a 10 ml bottle top dispenser (set on 6 ml), a 100 ml bottle of M9, a count-down timer set on 3:00 min, a tally counter, and a 2.5 ml Combi-tip attached to a repeat pipetter and set on 75 μl. We made a “25 μl glass pipet tip” by scoring and breaking off ∼4 cm from the end of a Pasteur pipet, inserting a plastic gel-loading tip into the broken end, and securing the junction with Parafilm.
Prior to, and during, the assay, room thermostats were adjusted to keep the assay area temperature at 22.5–23.5°, as monitored by a CheckTemp digital thermometer kept near the stereoscope stage. To start the assay, one of the source plates was transferred from the 20° incubator to the assay area. A 2.5 ml Combi-tip on a repeat pipetter was used to fill the first 12 wells in row A of the 96-well Thrashing Plate with 75 μl of M9. The 5 ml Unseeded Plate was then filled with 12 ml of M9 using the bottle top dispenser; 12 young adult animals were transferred from the source plate into the 12 ml of M9 in the unseeded plate. We then used a P20 set on 25 μl and the 25 μl glass pipet tip to transfer those animals one at a time, in a full 25 μl of M9 to the first 12 wells of the assay plate. We then immediately focused on the animal in the first well, started a count-down timer, and used a tally counter to count swimming cycles for 3 min. We then recorded the counter value on the datasheet, reset the timer and tally counter, focused on the animal in the next well, started the timer, and counted for 3 min, etc. until we had assayed all 12 animals. We then repeated this for two more sets of 12 animals for 36 animals total, using a fresh 5 ml unseeded plate for every 24 animals assayed.
When counting swimming cycles, we focused on one side of the animal in the middle of the body and count each time that part goes through a complete cycle. We started the timer when the animal was beginning the cycle, such that the first count represents one complete cycle.
Statistical analysis
We performed most statistical comparisons using the unpaired t-test, Welch corrected (for comparisons between two selected groups) or ANOVA followed by the Tukey Kramer post-test (for comparisons involving three or more groups) using Graphpad Instat 3 (Graphpad Software). To compare overall SV distributions relative to the DP (Figure 8), we used the Mann Whitney test on the binned data (run as nonparametric without assuming a Gaussian distribution). All statistical parameters, including the exact value of n, what n represents, and what error bars represent are reported in the figure legends or in the text for data presented in text form. Throughout the paper, the use of the word “significant” when describing a quantitative result means “statistically significant” (P < 0.05).
Data availability
Strains and plasmids are available upon request from the corresponding author, from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, or from AddGene. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables. Supplemental files available at FigShare. File S1 contains Figures S1–S6, Tables S1–S4, Supplemental Materials and Methods and Supplemental Material References. Supplemental material available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.6965732.
Results
Sentryn acts cell autonomously with CSS system proteins to inhibit the dynein-dependent accumulation of lysosomes in dendrites
In a genetic background lacking UNC-16 (JIP3), CSS system proteins have a property, unique among known proteins, of inhibiting the accumulation of lysosomes in dendrites (Edwards et al. 2015a) (see also Introduction). If Sentryn is a new CSS system protein, it might be expected to share this activity. To test this, we quantitatively imaged lysosomes in the dendrites of single, identified cholinergic motor neurons in C. elegans mutants lacking UNC-16 (JIP3) and in double mutants lacking both JIP3 and Sentryn. In C. elegans, Sentryn is also known by the gene name strn-1 (C16E9.2) or the protein name STRN-1. Throughout this study, we used the null deletion mutants strn-1(ok2996) and strn-1(ok2975) (Morrison et al. 2018). To visualize individual lysosomes in neurons, we crossed mutants with a genomically integrated transgene that expresses fluorescently tagged lysosomes in a set of nine cholinergic motor neurons (Edwards et al. 2013, 2015a).
Two combinations of unc-16; strn-1 double mutants accumulated significantly high numbers of lysosomes in dendrites, ∼3.5-fold higher than unc-16 single mutants (Figure 1A). This phenotype is caused by Sentryn acting cell-autonomously in cholinergic motor neurons because expressing a wild type strn-1 cDNA in the same neurons rescued dendritic lysosome levels back to the unc-16 single mutant level (Figure 1A). Sentryn’s ability to inhibit lysosome movements into dendrites has been evolutionarily conserved from worms to humans because a human Sentryn cDNA also significantly rescued the worm strn-1 mutant (Figure 1A).
In a strn-1 single mutant background (i.e., in a background containing wild-type UNC-16), the lysosome distribution in axons, dendrites, and somas resembled wild type (Figure S1, A–C), although dendritic lysosome levels approached significantly high levels (P = 0.0507) (Figure S1B). This is similar to other CSS system single mutants, which also have wild-type, or slightly high, dendritic lysosome levels (Edwards et al. 2015a).
The accumulation of lysosomes in unc-16; strn-1 double mutant dendrites correlated with a mild, but significant, reduction of lysosome levels in the cell soma. This could be rescued to unc-16 single mutant levels by expressing the worm strn-1 cDNA in the same cells (Figure S2A).
In the C. elegans motor neurons we imaged, microtubules in dendrites are oriented primarily with their minus-ends out (Goodwin et al. 2012; Yan et al. 2013). In mutants lacking both UNC-16 (JIP3) and the CSS system, the dendritic lysosome accumulation is dependent on the minus end-directed motor dynein (Edwards et al. 2015a). Although dynein null mutants are sterile in C. elegans, a prior study found that the deletion allele nud-2(ok949) strongly reduces minus-end directed motor activity on SVs in C. elegans motor neurons to an extent indistinguishable from strong loss-of-function mutations in DHC-1 (dynein heavy chain) (Ou et al. 2010). If Sentryn is a CSS system protein, then the dendritic lysosome accumulation in unc-16; strn-1 mutants should also be dynein-dependent, and, indeed, we found that was the case (Figure 1A and Figure S2A).
If Sentryn functions in the CSS system to inhibit dendritic lysosome accumulation in mutants lacking UNC-16 (JIP3), then combining a strn-1 null mutation with null mutations in CSS system proteins should not further increase dendritic lysosome accumulation. In an unc-16(−) background, the dendritic lysosome levels of a strn-1 null mutant were not significantly different from null mutants in the CSS system proteins SAD-1 (SAD kinase) and SYD-2 (Liprin-α). The dendritic lysosome accumulation of the unc-16sad-1 strn-1 triple mutant was not significantly different from the unc-16sad-1 double mutant, while the unc-16syd-2 strn-1 triple showed only a small significant increase over the unc-16syd-2 double (Figure 1B). Taken together with the results demonstrating dynein-dependence, these results suggest that, for regulating lysosome transport into dendrites in an unc-16(−) background, Sentryn’s function largely overlaps with the CSS system proteins SAD-1 (SAD kinase) and SYD-2 (Liprin-α).
In unc-16 mutant axons, SAD-1 (SAD kinase) can largely compensate for lack of sentryn
In wild-type axons, UNC-16 (JIP3) is very efficient at ensuring that dynein sends lysosomes back to the soma before they make it out of the axon initial segment (Edwards et al. 2013). In axons lacking UNC-16 (JIP3), lysosomes move deeper into the axon and accumulate in the synaptic region (Edwards et al. 2013). In the absence of UNC-16 (JIP3), CSS system proteins inhibit the clearance of lysosomes from axons (Edwards et al. 2015a). Knocking out the CSS system protein SAD-1 (SAD kinase) reduces the lysosome accumulation in unc-16 mutant axons by over 80% (Edwards et al. 2015a) (Figure 2).
When we quantified axonal lysosomes in two null alleles of strn-1 in an unc-16(−) background, the reductions were only 20–30%, and this was only significant for one of the two alleles (Figure 2). Furthermore, in quantitative experiments, we did not observe any improvement in locomotion rate for unc-16; strn-1 doubles compared to unc-16 singles (data not shown) in contrast to the improved locomotion rates of unc-16; sad-1 doubles (Edwards et al. 2015a). Overexpressing a wild-type Sentryn cDNA in the same neurons significantly increased, by around twofold, lysosome accumulation in unc-16 strn-1 double mutant axons (Figure 2). This suggests that Sentryn can inhibit the clearance of lysosomes from unc-16 mutant axons. The unc-16sad-1 strn-1 triple did not have significantly enhanced axonal lysosome clearance compared to the unc-16sad-1 double (Figure 2). These experiments suggest that the CSS protein SAD-1 can largely compensate for lack of Sentryn in the clearance of lysosomes from unc-16 mutant axons, but the reverse is not true.
In unc-16 mutant neurons, sentryn inhibits the minus-end accumulation of early endosomes
In unc-16 mutant neurons, early endosomes levels are much lower than wild type in dendrites and much higher than wild type in axons (Edwards et al. 2013, 2015a). Knocking out CSS system proteins in an unc-16(−) background reduces early endosome levels in axons by 40–60% and increases early endosome levels in dendrites by almost fivefold compared to unc-16 single mutants (Edwards et al. 2015a).
Using a genomically integrated transgene that expresses fluorescently tagged early endosomes in a set of nine cholinergic motor neurons (Edwards et al. 2013, 2015a), we found that Sentryn, like CSS system proteins, regulates the distribution of early endosomes in neurons. In dendrites, a strn-1 null mutation significantly increased the accumulation of early endosomes in unc-16 mutant dendrites by almost fivefold (Figure 3A). Similar to lysosomes, the effect in axons was smaller, but there was still a highly significant reduction of early endosomes in unc-16 strn-1 double mutant axons compared to unc-16 single mutants (Figure 3B).
The mutations we analyzed in this experiment are unlikely to have significantly affected the expression of the early endosome marker because our transgene also coexpressed soluble YFP under the same promoter as the early endosome marker, and the levels of this coexpressed marker were similar in all strains, with only small changes between strains that would not impact the conclusions of this experiment (Figure 3C).
Sentryn acts with the CSS system proteins SAD-1 and SYD-2 to ensure that optimal levels of SVs accumulate in the synaptic region
To determine if Sentryn, like CSS system proteins, regulates the localization of SVs, we analyzed the distribution of SVs in a single C. elegans motor neuron in Sentryn mutants. Using a genomically integrated transgene that expresses a fluorescently tagged SV protein (RAB-3), we found that two independent strn-1 null mutants had lower densities of SVs in the synaptic region of the DA9 motor neuron when compared to wild type (Figure 4A and Figure S3A). Both mutants also had significantly high levels of SVs in the dendrite, but neither allele had significantly high levels in the cell soma (Figure 4, B–D and Figure S3, B–D). The axonal and dendritic SV distribution phenotypes could be rescued cell-autonomously by expressing a wild type Sentryn cDNA in the DA9 motor neuron (Figure S3, A–D).
To determine if Sentryn acts in the CSS system to regulate SV localization, we analyzed single, double, and triple mutants that included all possible combinations of strn-1, sad-1, and syd-2 null mutations. A sad-1 null mutation reduced SV levels in the synaptic region to a level not significantly different from the strn-1 null mutant (70–75% of wild type), while a syd-2 null mutation reduced SV levels in the synaptic region more strongly, to ∼40% of wild type (Figure 4A). The strn-1 sad-1 double was significantly worse than either single mutant, such that its SV density in the synaptic region was not significantly different from the syd-2 null. However, neither strn-1 syd-2 nor sad-1syd-2 double mutants were significantly different from syd-2 single mutants. Furthermore, the SV density of the strn-1 sad-1syd-2 triple was not significantly worse than the syd-2 single mutant or the strn-1 sad-1 double (Figure 4A). This suggests that all three proteins act in the same system. However, in this context, Sentryn and SAD kinase each appear to have at least one nonoverlapping function, and their combined overlapping and nonoverlapping functions together enable the function of SYD-2 (liprin-α).
In the dendrite and soma, wild type has very low levels of SVs. sad-1 and syd-2 null mutants have much higher levels of SVs in these regions, while levels in strn-1 null mutants are significantly higher than wild type, but significantly lower than sad-1 and syd-2 mutants (Figure 4, B–D and Figure S3, B–D). No combination of these three mutations resulted in additive effects (Figure 4, B–D). However, in the dendrite, both sad-1 strn-1 and sad-1syd-2 double mutants have significantly lower levels of SVs than sad-1 single mutants (Figure 4, B–D). Although the reason for this suppression is unclear, the results suggest that all three proteins function in the same system in the context of the soma and dendrite, with Sentryn having a more minor role in the function that determines SV levels in these locations.
Sentryn acts with the CSS proteins SAD-1 and SYD-2 to promote accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region
Previously, we showed that CSS system proteins act to ensure that KIF1A outcompetes dynein during the outward transport of SVs to the synaptic region (Edwards et al. 2015b). In CSS system null mutants, KIF1A is no longer able to outcompete dynein to the same extent as it is in wild type, thus causing a fraction of the total SV population to build-up in cell somas and dendrites in a dynein-dependent manner (Edwards et al. 2015b).
The accumulation of SVs in somas and dendrites (i.e., defective forward transport of SVs) likely contributes to the lower SV density in the synaptic region of Sentryn and CSS system mutants. This makes sense: if more SVs accumulate in the soma and dendrite, then there might be fewer available to go to, or be retained at, the synaptic region. However, it is possible that a defect in the capture of SVs in the synaptic region also contributes to the lower SV densities in the synaptic region of Sentryn and CSS system mutants. Indeed, for DCVs, which are more amenable to direct visualization of capture and capture defects and use the same transport motors as SVs, both guided transport and capture defects were found to significantly contribute to the altered DCV distributions in the CSS and Sentryn mutants (Morrison et al. 2018).
The DA9 motor neuron in C. elegans provides an ideal system to assay for SV capture defects because it contains a short, nonterminal synaptic region sandwiched between proximal and distal asynaptic regions (White et al. 1986; Klassen and Shen 2007). If a SV or a small cluster of SVs fails to be captured in the synaptic region, motors could theoretically move SVs to either of the flanking asynaptic regions where they would accumulate. To test for SV capture defects in Sentryn and CSS system mutants, we used a large field-of-view camera and multiple, overlapping images to assemble a high-resolution view of fluorescently tagged SVs along the entire 0.5 mm long DA9 axon in wild-type, Sentryn, SAD Kinase, and Liprin-α null mutant adults. We then produced profile plots of the SV distributions in the DA9 axon and measured the length of the region with SV signals exceeding a predefined threshold. In this assay, an expanded length is the expected result for a SV capture defect.
In wild type, SVs were tightly restricted to a 100 μm region and did not accumulate in either of the flanking asynaptic regions (Figure 5A). In a null mutant lacking the CSS system protein SYD-2, SVs were reduced in the synaptic region and accumulated in both flanking asynaptic regions (Figure 5A). Although SVs filled nearly the entire distal asynaptic region of the syd-2 mutant axon, they were not quite randomly distributed, but still showed an enrichment in the synaptic region. Quantification of the length of the region with SVs revealed an over fourfold expansion in length that, on average, filled most of the axon (Figure 5B).
The strn-1 single mutant showed a small but significant increase in the length of the region with SVs (hereafter referred to as expansion length) (Figure 5B). The sad-1 null mutant’s expansion length was intermediate between the significantly longer expansion length of the syd-2 null mutant and the significantly shorter expansion length of the strn-1 mutant (Figure 5B). The strn-1 sad-1 double null mutant showed an additive effect, with an expansion length significantly longer than either single mutant and not significantly different from the syd-2 single mutant (Figure 5B). The strn-1 syd-2 double mutant was not significantly worse than the syd-2 single mutant, suggesting that Sentryn acts in the same process as SYD-2 (Liprin-α) in this context. However, the expansion length of the sad-1syd-2 double mutant was slightly, but significantly, worse than the syd-2 single mutant, and the expansion length of the strn-1 sad-1syd-2 triple was significantly worse than the strn-1 sad-1 double (Figure 5B). These latter results suggests that SAD kinase has some capture activity in the absence of SYD-2, and that SYD-2 has a small amount of capture activity in the combined absence of Sentryn and SAD kinase.
Overall, these results suggests that all three proteins act as part of the same system in this context, but that SAD kinase and SYD-2 can also act independently of each other to a small degree. Furthermore, in this context, Sentryn and SAD kinase each appear to have at least one nonoverlapping function, and their combined overlapping and nonoverlapping functions together appear to enable most of the function of SYD-2 (Liprin-α).
SV misaccumulations in asynaptic regions of other neuron types
Misaccumulation of SVs in an asynaptic region may be easier to detect in C. elegans ventral cord cholinergic motor neurons than in other neurons due to the presence of their long distal asynaptic regions. These regions, hypothesized to contain stretch receptors (Chalfie and White 1988), provide a large reservoir in which SVs that may have evaded capture at the synaptic region can accumulate. This may also contribute to greater losses of SVs from clusters in the synaptic region than would otherwise be observed. Most neurons lack such an extensive distal asynaptic region. What does SV misaccumulation in asynaptic regions look like in neurons without a long distal asynaptic region? Do CSS system proteins also contribute to localizing SVs to synapses in such neurons?
To address these questions, we imaged native SV clusters in the sublateral axons of C. elegans. In contrast to the DA9 motor neuron axon, these axons do not have a single defined synaptic region, but instead have relatively widely spaced synapses along their length. Each intersynaptic region in these axons is thus the equivalent of a short asynaptic region. Thus, in mutants that are unable to prevent SVs from escaping the synaptic region, SVs, or microclusters of SVs, should accumulate in the intersynaptic regions.
To test this, we immunostained adult animals using a monoclonal antibody specific for the synaptic vesicle ACh transporter, and then quantitatively imaged SV clusters in the sublateral axons. Wild-type clusters showed the expected pattern of relatively widely spaced prominent clusters with intersynaptic regions containing few or no SV microclusters. In contrast, mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase showed a “broken-up” pattern of microclusters interspersed with larger clusters. The largest clusters in the mutants appeared similar in size to small wild-type clusters (Figure 6, A and B).
Consistent with the predicted accumulation of SV microclusters in intersynaptic regions, strn-1 and sad-1 null single mutants had significantly higher numbers of clusters and microclusters per micrometer of axon length (Figure 6C). Although the cluster densities of strn-1 and sad-1 single mutants were not significantly different from each other, the strn-1 sad-1 double mutant had a higher average cluster density than either single mutant (∼140% of wild type). This was significant when comparing the double to strn-1 single mutants, but not quite significant when comparing the double to sad-1 single mutants (Figure 6C).
If SVs misaccumulate in microclusters in intersynaptic regions, this should not change the total SV content per unit length of the axon. Indeed, that is the result we obtained for syd-2 null mutants when analyzing the DA9 axon using transgenically tagged SVs (Edwards et al. 2015b). Consistent with this, the average SV fluorescence per micrometer of strn-1 and sad-1 single mutant axons was not significantly different from wild type, although it trended lower (Figure 6D). The average SV fluorescence per micrometer of the strn-1 sad-1 double was slightly, but significantly, lower than wild type (∼80% of wild type; Figure 6D). Since many microclusters are barely detectable above the high background inherent in any immunostaining experiment, we suggest that the lower level in the strn-1 sad-1 double results from some fraction of microclusters evading detection due to masking by the background. The likelihood of this occurring should be higher in the strn-1 sad-1 double than in either single mutant due to the larger number of microclusters in the double, as shown in Figure 6C.
The above analysis of SV clusters in sublateral axons provides an alternative view of SV misaccumulation in asynaptic regions in sad-1 and strn-1 mutants that complements the analysis of the DA9 axon. These results also appear to provide independent, complementary evidence suggesting that Sentryn and SAD kinase each have at least one nonoverlapping function consistent with a deficiency in capturing SVs in synaptic regions (i.e., that the double mutant tends to be more severe than either single mutant).
Presynaptic ultrastructure and SV distributions relative to the active zone are significantly altered in mutants lacking sentryn and/or SAD kinase
To determine if the reductions in synaptic region SVs in mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase were occurring precisely at synapses, we first quantified native SVs in cholinergic motor neuron synapses using HPF electron microscopy (EM). In all, we sampled an average of 15 synapses taken from a total of three animals each for wild type and strains lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase. The results, obtained blinded, closely matched the results we obtained by imaging transgenically tagged SVs in axons, where we sampled a much larger number of synapses (typically a total of ∼375 synapses taken from a total of 15 animals per genotype). Wild type synapses, reconstructed from an average of 13 thin (40 nm) sections that spanned each synapse, had an average of 412 SVs (Figure 7A). SVs at strn-1 and sad-1 null mutant synapses were reduced to 63 and 72% of wild type, respectively (Figure 7A), similar to the above results for transgenically tagged SVs. Due to the small sample size and high variability of SV numbers between synapses, this was not statistically significant for either mutant. However, SV numbers at strn-1 sad-1 double mutant synapses were further reduced, to 52 ± 6% of wild type (Figure 7, A and D). This was highly significant and closely matched the above result for transgenically tagged SVs in the same double mutant (i.e., Figure 4A).
Although docked SVs were also significantly reduced in the sad-1 single mutant and the strn-1 sad-1 double (Figure 7B), we did not find evidence for a specific defect in SV docking. Instead docked SVs were simply reduced proportional to total SVs (Figure 7B), as was previously found for syd-2 null mutants (Kittelmann et al. 2013). The strn-1 sad-1 double mutant showed the strongest significant reduction in docked SVs, to 53% of wild type, closely matching the reduction in total SVs (Figure 7B).
A previous study found that the DP, which is the electron dense structure at the center of the active zone, was reduced in length in mutants lacking SYD-2 (Liprin-α) (Kittelmann et al. 2013). If Sentryn and SAD kinase have functions that overlap with Liprin-α at the active zone, mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase might also show this ultrastructural defect. Indeed, we found that DP length, measured in blinded samples by counting the number of 40 nm sections that contained a single DP, was significantly reduced in all three mutant strains lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase (Figure 7C). The strongest, most significant reduction in DP length occurred in strn-1 sad-1 double mutants (50% of wild type), although its value was not statistically different from either single mutant (Figure 7C).
We next sought to determine the regions of the synapse from which SVs are missing in mutants lacking Sentryn and SAD kinase. Because the DP length is reduced in mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase, and because SVs are known to cluster around the DP (Stigloher et al. 2011), we hypothesized that the missing SVs in mutants lacking Sentryn and SAD kinase might be those SVs that are closest to the DP, or, alternatively, that SVs might be uniformly reduced regardless of their location relative to the DP. To determine this, we divided synapses into 33 nm wide zones progressively extending from the DP and counted the SVs in each zone. Unexpectedly, the data showed that SVs in mutant synapses lacking Sentryn, or both Sentryn and SAD kinase, were present in wild type numbers in zones that were ≤165 nm from the DP, while SVs in zones farther than 165 nm, specifically 165–700 nm from the DP, were present at lower numbers than wild type (Figure 8, A–C). When individually comparing corresponding zones of each mutant strain to wild type, this reached significance in the Sentryn single mutant for two zones covering ∼350–400 nm from the DP and, in the Sentryn/SAD kinase double mutant, for nine zones covering ∼250–550 nm (Figure 8, A–C). When comparing the overall SV distributions of wild type to each mutant strain using the Mann-Whitney test, the Sentryn single mutant and the Sentryn/SAD kinase double SV distributions were significantly different from wild type (i.e., significantly skewed such that more distal SVs were missing). The SV distribution of the SAD kinase single mutant trended toward, but did not reach, significance, but all zones in the SAD kinase single mutant >165 nm from the DP had fewer SVs than wild type (Figure 8, A–C).
Overall, the EM results, though lacking the statistical power of the transgenically tagged SV studies, are consistent with the reductions of SVs at synapses that we observed in the transgenic studies. Furthermore, the EM studies added important new information by identifying the synapse zones in which SVs are missing in mutants lacking Sentryn or both Sentryn and SAD kinase. Finally, the finding that Sentryn contributes to the structure of the active zone in a manner similar to the active zone proteins Liprin-α, which functions in the same pathway as Sentryn, suggests the intriguing possibility that Sentryn could be a new active zone protein.
Sentryn appears to be a new active zone protein that is dependent on another active zone protein for its localization
Active zones, which mark the sites of SV exocytosis, are the focal points around which SVs are captured in the synaptic region (Weimer et al. 2006; Stigloher et al. 2011; Hoover et al. 2014). The CSS system proteins SYD-2 (Liprin-α) and SAD kinase are enriched at active zones (Ackley et al. 2005; Yeh et al. 2005; Inoue et al. 2006; Weimer et al. 2006; Fouquet et al. 2009). Since the data suggest that Sentryn is also a CSS system protein, and, since the above results show that it plays a role in active zone ultrastructure, we hypothesized that Sentryn might also be enriched at active zones. Our data suggest that is the case. Sentryn largely colocalizes with the active zone-enriched proteins UNC-10 (RIM) and SAD-1 (SAD Kinase) (Figure 9A). When we expressed a rescuing version of full-length GFP-tagged Sentryn at low levels in the DB7 motor neuron, we observed a highly focal localization of Sentryn in a small area of each bouton at the ventral apex of the bouton. The ventral apex is the precise location of the active zone (Figure 9B). In contrast, in a syd-2 null mutant, Sentryn was present in the synaptic region, but showed a diffuse or patchy diffuse localization and was not enriched at the ventral apex (Figure 9C). In a sad-1 null mutant, Sentryn’s localization appeared partially disrupted, sometimes localizing to the ventral apex and sometimes appearing unlocalized or localizing to bouton regions other than the ventral apex (Figure 9C). In general, Sentryn localization is variable in animals lacking sad-1. This is evident when comparing a panel of Sentryn localization images from different sad-1 mutant animals (Figure S6).
In summary, these data suggest that Sentryn is enriched at active zones, and that Sentryn physically interacts with SYD-2 (Liprin-α), or with a SYD-2-dependent protein or complex, to be recruited to active zones. Furthermore, Sentryn appears partially dependent on SAD kinase for localization to active zones.
CSS system proteins are a specialized set of active zone-enriched proteins with unique roles in ensuring the stable accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region
Given that the three CSS proteins we investigated in this study all appear to be active zone-enriched proteins, we wondered if any other active zone-enriched proteins might also have roles in the stable accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region. Indeed, we previously found that SYD-1 acts in the CSS system, and that syd-1 null mutants have impaired SV transport and SV capture in the synaptic region (Edwards et al. 2015a,b). SYD-1 is an active zone-enriched protein with PDZ, C2 and rhoGAP-like domains (Hallam et al. 2002; Owald et al. 2010), and it also functions with SYD-2 (Liprin-α) and SAD-1 (SAD kinase) in synapse assembly in C. elegans (Dai et al. 2006; Patel et al. 2006). Could other active zone-enriched proteins also have roles in ensuring the stable accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region?
To test this, we analyzed putative null mutants in seven other active zone-enriched proteins using our capture failure assay in the DA9 motor neuron (i.e., the assay used for Figure 5). One of the mutants, the rimb-1 (rim-binding protein) null mutant, showed a slight (<10%), but significant, expansion of SVs into the flanking asynaptic regions (Figure S5, A and B). Consistent with RIMB-1 having a role in the CSS system, SVs also accumulated in rimb-1 mutant dendrites (192 ± 32% compared to wild type; N = 15; P = 0.015; Figure S5D). However, unlike other CSS system mutants, the overall density of SVs in the DA9 synaptic region of the rimb-1 null mutant was not significantly reduced (103 ± 4% of wild type, N = 15; Figure S5C). None of the other six mutants showed significant SV accumulation outside of the synaptic region (Figure S5B). These mutants included null mutants in UNC-13 and five active-zone-enriched proteins known to interact with SYD-2 (see Figure S5B for protein names and references). Indeed, null mutants lacking UNC-10 (RIM) or UNC-13 showed a small but significant compression of the synaptic region (∼80% of wild type; Figure S5B). Thus, with the possible exception of a minor or redundant role for RIMB in the CSS system, none of the other six active zone proteins we tested have essential roles in the SV capture function of the CSS system in C. elegans.
Sentryn mutations impair locomotion behavior
The release of ACh from SVs at ventral cord motor neuron synapses is essential for locomotion (Alfonso et al. 1993). To determine if Sentryn and/or SAD kinase contribute to locomotion behavior, we quantified the rate of swimming cycles in wild type and mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase. Placing C. elegans in liquid over a smooth agar surface induces an escape response, in which the animal alters its locomotion pattern and attempts to escape the liquid via high frequency swimming cycles. We counted swimming cycles in at least 36 wild-type and mutant animals for 3 min per animal and obtained averages. At 23°, wild type has ∼100 swimming cycles per minute (Figure 10). Two mutants putatively null for Sentryn swam at a rates significantly lower than wild type (74% and 85%, respectively), while the sad-1(ce749) mutant swam at a rate that was slightly, but significantly, higher than wild type (107%) (Figure 10). However, two combinations of strn-1 sad-1 doubles swam significantly slower than the corresponding strn-1 singles (68 and 74%, respectively), suggesting that Sentryn and SAD kinase have at least one nonoverlapping function that affects locomotion (Figure 10). We note that, on solid media plates, where animals exhibit locomotion rates that average ∼1/6th of their rates in liquid, mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase appear indistinguishable from wild type (data not shown). Overall, these relatively mild defects in locomotion suggest that the SV deficits at motor neuron synapses in these mutants are not large enough to profoundly affect the animal’s behavior, and that there could be more than one SV capture mechanism.
Discussion
This study suggests that Sentryn is a novel active zone protein and a component of a sophisticated system that guides the transport and stable accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region. Evidence for a connection between Sentryn and the CSS system came from the finding that Sentryn and CSS system mutants affect DCV axonal transport and synaptic capture as part of the same system (Morrison et al. 2018). However, it was unclear whether Sentryn is merely an adaptor that connects the CSS system specifically to the guided transport and capture of DCVs, or whether it is a component of the CSS system in other contexts as well.
The results presented here suggest that, in most contexts, Sentryn is indeed a component of the CSS system because it can guide and regulate the motorized transport of a wide spectrum of cargos in neurons. These findings add to a growing body of evidence that the guided axonal transport of SVs and their stable accumulation in the synaptic region are linked through CSS system proteins.
We also provided evidence that Sentryn, like other CSS system proteins, is an active zone-enriched protein that contributes to the structure of the active zone. Sentryn, and the recently reported Clarinet protein (Xuan et al. 2017), appear to be the first active zone proteins to be discovered in over 11 years. The CSS system appears to be a specialized subset of active zone-enriched proteins that functions not only in the synaptic region, but throughout the neuron. Below, we expand on these concepts and explain their significance.
Sentryn and CSS system mutants can affect the active transport of a wide spectrum of cargos
Mutants lacking Sentryn have the signature spectrum of active transport phenotypes shared by all CSS system proteins. Active transport phenotypes in Sentryn and CSS system mutants present as a skewing of cargo distribution toward microtubule minus ends, away from axons and toward cell somas and dendrites. These phenotypes are unlikely to result from defects in neuronal polarity (i.e., causing the dendrite to acquire the identity of an axon) for two reasons. First, defects in active transport can account for the altered distribution. Second, if the dendrite acquired the identity of an axon in CSS system mutants, the microtubule polarity of the dendrite would switch from predominantly minus-end out, as is the case for C. elegans motor neurons, to plus-end out. Impairing dynein would then worsen the accumulation of cargos in dendrites rather than mitigate this phenotype as we found (this study; Edwards et al. 2015a,b; Morrison et al. 2018 for DCVs).
The affected cargos include not only SVs and DCVs but also some classes of large cell soma organelles, such as lysosomes and early endosomes. Sentryn mutants, like CSS system mutants, exhibit a dynein-dependent accumulation of these organelles in dendrites, but only in an unc-16(−) (JIP3 null) background. To our knowledge, CSS system mutants are the only mutants that affect organelle transport in this manner. This is significant because it suggests that Sentryn and CSS system proteins can guide the active transport of cargos at locations far from the main site of enrichment of CSS proteins at active zones.
According to our current model, the core purpose of Sentryn and the CSS system in axonal regions proximal to the first synapse is to ensure that KIF1A outcompetes dynein, and, thus, promotes the forward progress of SVs and DCVs toward the synaptic region. Dynein is a constant threat to SVs and DCVs traveling to the synaptic region, causing them to reverse their direction numerous times en route (Edwards et al. 2015b).
The CSS system appears to have the ability to regulate transport in both directions, perhaps depending on the location, the cargo type, and the relative concentrations of each CSS protein within the axon. During guided transport of DCVs (and presumably SVs that are transported by the same motors), SYD-2 (Liprin-α), Sentryn, and SAD kinase all act to reduce pausing in the axon initial segment and in the synaptic region (Goodwin and Juo 2013; Morrison et al. 2018). The CSS system normally inhibits dynein-mediated movements in this context, without significantly affecting plus end-directed movements (Edwards et al. 2015a). In contrast, Sentryn and SAD Kinase promote KIF1A plus-end movements without affecting dynein minus-end movements (Morrison et al. 2018).
Consistent with SV transport being regulated similar to DCV transport, SYD-2 (Liprin-α) promotes the plus-end movements of the KIF1A plus-end motor itself (Wagner et al. 2009). After transport, as SVs become captured in the synaptic region, where CSS proteins are present in their highest concentrations, transport of DCVs and SVs is inhibited in both directions as DCVs and SVs decrease their exit frequencies from mature clusters (Wu et al. 2013; Morrison et al. 2018). In the synaptic region, Sentryn and SAD kinase also act to ensure balanced movement of any DCVs that spontaneously escape capture. Evidence for this comes from the finding that mutants lacking Sentryn and/or SAD kinase show a strong bias for DCV movements in the anterograde direction, which would take DCVs past the synaptic region (Morrison et al. 2018).
The guided active transport of SVs and their subsequent stable accumulation in the synaptic region may be mechanistically linked through sentryn, SAD kinase, and Liprin-α
Our results suggest that Sentryn acts with SAD kinase and Liprin-α to ensure the stable accumulation of SVs in the synaptic region. The finding that Sentryn, SAD kinase, and Liprin-α are all involved in both SV guided transport and SV stable accumulation in the synaptic region is significant, because it suggests that both processes are linked through these proteins. Similar findings were also obtained for DCVs (Morrison et al. 2018). SYD-1 is also a CSS system protein and active zone component that functions in the same processes as Liprin-α and SAD kinase (Dai et al. 2006; Patel et al. 2006; Owald et al. 2010; Li et al. 2014; Edwards et al. 2015a). The common link seems to be the regulation of motor activity and/or the interactions of SVs with motors and/or microtubules.
The transport-to-capture transition
During transport, the effectiveness of dynein must be limited or overcome to allow the forward transport of SVs to dominate. Upon reaching the synaptic region, a drastic transition occurs. SVs must be protected from counter-productive motor activity to be maintained in a captured state in clusters. However, SVs must now also be protected from plus end-directed movements, which would take them beyond the synaptic region.
We do not yet know how Sentryn and the CSS system alter their relationship with the motor system at the transport-to-capture transition. SYD-2 prevents the dissociation of SVs from clusters (Wu et al. 2013). To do so, SYD-2 would have to suppress movements in both directions, in contrast to the situation during transport where SYD-2 ensures the dominance of anterograde movements. In addition, in the absence of a CSS system SVs and DCVs accumulate in the distal asynaptic region, as far as ∼0.5 mm from the synaptic region (Edwards et al. 2015b; this study; Morrison et al. 2018). Finally, Sentryn promotes entry into the synaptic region, and both Sentryn and SAD kinase strongly limit the number of both anterograde and retrograde movements of DCVs within the synaptic region (Morrison et al. 2018). Sentryn and SAD kinase also ensure balanced anterograde and retrograde movements for any DCVs that escape capture, favoring the recapture of DCVs in the synaptic region (Morrison et al. 2018). Thus, CSS system proteins suppress unbalanced plus- and minus-end movements after capture, but they primarily ensure the dominance of plus-end movements during transport.
One possible explanation for the transport-to-capture transition is that the much higher concentrations of CSS system proteins in the synaptic region (i.e., their strong enrichment near active zones) alters their interactions with the motor system and ultimately leads to the inhibition of motorized transport. Interestingly, our EM data suggest that Sentryn and SAD kinase are not necessary to capture or retain SVs closer than 165 nm from the DP, but they are required to capture or retain more distal SVs. This suggests that capture may be a two-step process. The first step or mechanism, mediated by CSS proteins, appears to promote capture of SVs that are 165–700 nm from the active zone. The second step promotes the capture of SVs more proximal to the active zone (<165 nm). It is possible that one or both of these mechanisms utilize physical anchoring or tethering, such as to the DP or filaments emanating from it. However, mutant mice axons that lack active zones and DPs still contain wild type levels of Liprin-α (SYD-2) at synapses and still capture wild-type numbers of SVs that are unclustered (Acuna et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). Although this does not rule out that some form of tethering contributes to capture, it suggests that immobilization via physical anchoring to the DP is not necessary for the SV capture. Tethering of SVs at synapses may act primarily to cluster SVs or reduce the diffusion of SVs from synaptic sites, but further investigation is necessary to determine whether tethering is sufficient to protect SVs from the strong forces of motors.
Visualizing SV accumulation defects in different kinds of axons
SV accumulation defects can be difficult to detect in some neurons. The DA9 motor neuron in C. elegans is ideal for visualizing such defects because it has a compact synaptic region and a long, distal asynaptic region. The defects we observed in in sad-1 and strn-1 mutants sublateral motor neuron axons, which have a very different arrangement of SV clusters compared to DA9, are consistent with the defects we observed in the DA9 neuron. In both cases, in CSS system mutants, SV clusters are smaller in size, and SVs accumulate in asynaptic regions.
Sentryn appears to be a novel active zone protein and a missing link enabling the function of SYD-2 (Liprin-α) in the synaptic region
In the synaptic region, analysis of double and triple mutants showed that Sentryn and SAD kinase each have at least one nonoverlapping function that, when combined with their shared functions, enables most of the functions of SYD-2 (Liprin-α) for ensuring optimal levels of SVs in the synaptic region. We also observed Sentryn and SAD kinase additive effects for DCV accumulation in the synaptic region of cholinergic motor neurons. The additive effects of Sentryn and SAD kinase are significant because it has long been known that SYD-2 acts in the same pathway as SAD kinase for synapse assembly and capturing SVs to clusters (Patel et al. 2006). However, mutants lacking SYD-2 have significantly stronger synapse assembly/SV capture phenotypes than mutants lacking SAD kinase (Patel et al. 2006; Edwards et al. 2015b). This led to the prediction that one or more additional SYD-2 effectors exists (Patel et al. 2006). Our results suggest that Sentryn is the missing effector.
We observed no additive effects for Sentryn and SAD kinase for their functions in excluding lysosomes and SVs from dendrites. These findings further support the concept that the relationships of CSS proteins to the motor system differ in different contexts or regions of the neuron, as has also been shown for DCVs (Morrison et al. 2018).
This study suggests that Sentryn is an active zone protein. This is significant because active zone proteins are not frequently discovered. Sentryn and the recently discovered Clarinet protein (Xuan et al. 2017) appear to be the first new active zone proteins to be discovered in many years. Adding mechanistic insight into the actions of Sentryn, we showed that Sentryn is dependent on SYD-2 (Liprin-α) for its localization to active zones. Similar results have been found for SAD Kinase (Patel et al. 2006). Thus, at active zones, Sentryn and SAD kinase act downstream of SYD-2 and must at some point physically interact with SYD-2 (Liprin-α), or with a SYD-2-dependent protein or complex, to mediate the active zone functions of SYD-2. However, the interaction of Sentryn with other proteins may be transient or unstable because Sentryn has eluded discovery by conventional biochemical approaches for over 25 years, despite very intensive investigation of SVs, DCVs, and active zone proteins by many laboratories.
The CSS system: a specialized set of active zone-enriched proteins
Our results suggest that not all active zone-enriched proteins have essential roles in the CSS system. This supports a growing body of evidence suggesting that there are at least two groups of active zone-enriched proteins.
One appears to play a major role in active zone structure, but does not have a direct role in SV capture. This group was revealed by studies that found that dual elimination of either RIM plus RIMB protein or ELKS plus RIM led to disassembly of the active zone/DP and eliminated tethering and priming (i.e., docking) of SVs but did not affect SV capture at synapses (Acuna et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). This first group may also include other structural components of the active zone that together mediate several different functions related to neurotransmitter release, such as Ca2+ channel localization and function and SV docking (Sudhof 2012; Ackermann et al. 2015). The second group of active zone proteins, represented by CSS proteins, appears to play a minor structural role in determining the length of the DP, but mainly functions in capturing vesicles in the 165–700 nm zone relative to the DP. In Drosophila mutants lacking both SYD-1 and SYD-2 (Liprin-α), and in worm mutants lacking SYD-2, the active zone/DP (known as a T-bar in flies) is “readily identifiable” (Owald et al. 2010; Stigloher et al. 2011), although quantitative studies in C. elegans have shown that the DP can be significantly shorter in CSS system mutants, at least at cholinergic motor neuron synapses (Kittelmann et al. 2013; this study).
The CSS system is the specialized set of active-zone enriched proteins that has dual roles in both guiding the active transport of SVs and DCVs and in ensuring their capture/stable accumulation in the synaptic region. It is important to note that “active zone-enriched” does not mean that the proteins exclusively localize to, or exclusively function at, the active zone. CSS system proteins also affect transport at sites far removed from active zones in the synaptic region. Furthermore, because DCVs do not share as close a relationship with active zones as SVs, and yet are captured to the synaptic region with the same fidelity as SVs (Morrison et al. 2018), we hypothesize that Sentryn, SAD kinase, and Liprin-α are also present at the sites of DCV capture (i.e., on the fringes of the SV cluster), but that they are greatly enriched at active zones (i.e., at the center of the SV cluster).
Originally the CSS system was named for three founder proteins (CDK-5, SAD-1, and SYD-2) that inhibit dynein-mediated lysosome clearance in unc-16 mutant axons (Edwards et al. 2015a). However, CDK-5 does not strictly fit this definition, because, even though it promotes the outward transport of SVs and DCVs (and organelles in the absence of unc-16) (Ou et al. 2010; Goodwin et al. 2012; Edwards et al. 2015a,b), there is no evidence that it is enriched at active zones or that it participates in SV capture. Indeed, in cdk-5 null mutants SV clusters do not expand into the distal asynaptic region (synaptic region length 95 ± 15% of wild type; N = 14). Hence, in this article we have proposed redefining the CSS abbreviation as Core Synapse Stability system to reflect its ultimate role of ensuring the transport and retention of optimal numbers of captured SVs and DCVs at synapses.
Acknowledgments
We thank Edwin Levitan for providing a plasmid containing Emerald, and Joshua Arribere and Andrew Fire for providing the gRNA plasmid pJP118. Many critical strains in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440) and by Shohei Mitani as part of the Japanese National Bioresource Project. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH (R01GM080765 to K.G.M.) and by a grant from the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (HR14-003 to K.G.M.). This work made use of the BioCryo facility of Northwestern University’s NUANCE Center, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205); the MRSEC program (NSF DMR-1720139) at the Materials Research Center; the International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN); and the State of Illinois, through the IIN. It also made use of the CryoCluster equipment, which has received support from the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) program (NSF DMR-1229693).
Note added in proof: See Morrison et al. 2018 (pp 925–946) in this issue for a related work.
Footnotes
Supplemental material available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.6965732.
Communicating editor: M. Johnston
Literature Cited
- Ackley B. D., Harrington R. J., Hudson M. L., Williams L., Kenyon C. J., et al. , 2005. The two isoforms of the Caenorhabditis elegans leukocyte-common antigen related receptor tyrosine phosphatase PTP-3 function independently in axon guidance and synapse formation. J. Neurosci. 25: 7517–7528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ackermann F., Waites C. L., Garner C. C., 2015. Presynaptic active zones in invertebrates and vertebrates. EMBO Rep 16: 923–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Acuna C., Liu X., Sudhof T. C., 2016. How to make an active zone: unexpected universal functional redundancy between RIMs and RIM-BPs. Neuron 91: 792–807. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alfonso A., Grundahl K., Duerr J. S., Han H.-P., Rand J. B., 1993. The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-17 gene: a putative vesicular acetylcholine transporter. Science 261: 617–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arribere J. A., Bell R. T., Fu B. X., Artiles K. L., Hartman P. S., et al. , 2014. Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 198: 837–846. 10.1534/genetics.114.169730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baas P. W., Lin S., 2011. Hooks and comets: the story of microtubule polarity orientation in the neuron. Dev. Neurobiol. 71: 403–418. 10.1002/dneu.20818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner S., 1974. The genetics of C. elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burton P. R., Paige J. L., 1981. Polarity of axoplasmic microtubules in the olfactory nerve of the frog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3269–3273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalfie M., White J., 1988. The nervous system, pp. 337–391 in The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, edited by Wood W. B. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- Charlie N. K., Schade M. A., Thomure A. M., Miller K. G., 2006. Presynaptic UNC-31 (CAPS) is required to activate the G alpha(s) pathway of the Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic signaling network. Genetics 172: 943–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crump J. G., Zhen M., Jin Y., Bargmann C. I., 2001. The SAD-1 kinase regulates presynaptic vesicle clustering and axon termination. Neuron 29: 115–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai Y., Taru H., Deken S. L., Grill B., Ackley B., et al. , 2006. SYD-2 Liprin-alpha organizes presynaptic active zone formation through ELKS. Nat. Neurosci. 9: 1479–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickinson D. J., Ward J. D., Reiner D. J., Goldstein B., 2013. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat. Methods 10: 1028–1034. 10.1038/nmeth.2641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards S. L., Charlie N. K., Milfort M. C., Brown B. S., Gravlin C. N., et al. , 2008. A novel molecular solution for ultraviolet light detection in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 6: e198 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards S. L., Yu S. C., Hoover C. M., Phillips B. C., Richmond J. E., et al. , 2013. An organelle gatekeeper function for Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-16 (JIP3) at the axon initial segment. Genetics 194: 143–161. 10.1534/genetics.112.147348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards S. L., Morrison L. M., Yorks R. M., Hoover C. M., Boominathan S., et al. , 2015a. UNC-16 (JIP3) acts through synapse-assembly proteins to inhibit the active transport of cell soma organelles to Caenorhabditis elegans motor neuron axons. Genetics 201: 117–141. 10.1534/genetics.115.177345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards S. L., Yorks R. M., Morrison L. M., Hoover C. M., Miller K. G., 2015b. Synapse-assembly proteins maintain synaptic vesicle cluster stability and regulate synaptic vesicle transport in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 201: 91–116. 10.1534/genetics.115.177337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez-Busnadiego R., Zuber B., Maurer U. E., Cyrklaff M., Baumeister W., et al. , 2010. Quantitative analysis of the native presynaptic cytomatrix by cryoelectron tomography. J. Cell Biol. 188: 145–156. 10.1083/jcb.200908082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fouquet W., Owald D., Wichmann C., Mertel S., Depner H., et al. , 2009. Maturation of active zone assembly by Drosophila Bruchpilot. J. Cell Biol. 186: 129–145. 10.1083/jcb.200812150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin P. R., Juo P., 2013. The scaffolding protein SYD-2/Liprin-alpha regulates the mobility and polarized distribution of dense-core vesicles in C. elegans motor neurons. PLoS One 8: e54763 10.1371/journal.pone.0054763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin P. R., Sasaki J. M., Juo P., 2012. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulates the polarized trafficking of neuropeptide-containing dense-core vesicles in Caenorhabditis elegans motor neurons. J. Neurosci. 32: 8158–8172. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0251-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall D. H., Hedgecock E. M., 1991. Kinesin-related gene unc-104 is required for axonal transport of synaptic vesicles in C. elegans. Cell 65: 837–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallam S. J., Goncharov A., McEwen J., Baran R., Jin Y., 2002. SYD-1, a presynaptic protein with PDZ, C2 and rhoGAP-like domains, specifies axon identity in C. elegans. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 1137–1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammarlund M., Watanabe S., Schuske K., Jorgensen E. M., 2008. CAPS and syntaxin dock dense core vesicles to the plasma membrane in neurons. J. Cell Biol. 180: 483–491. 10.1083/jcb.200708018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidemann S. R., Landers J. M., Hamborg M. A., 1981. Polarity orientation of axonal microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 91: 661–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoover C. M., Edwards S. L., Yu S. C., Kittelmann M., Richmond J. E., et al. , 2014. A novel CaM kinase II pathway controls the location of neuropeptide release from Caenorhabditis elegans motor neurons. Genetics 196: 745–765. 10.1534/genetics.113.158568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inoue E., Mochida S., Takagi H., Higa S., Deguchi-Tawarada M., et al. , 2006. SAD: a presynaptic kinase associated with synaptic vesicles and the active zone cytomatrix that regulates neurotransmitter release. Neuron 50: 261–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kandel E. R., 2013. Principles of Neural Science. McGraw-Hill, New York. [Google Scholar]
- Kittelmann M., Hegermann J., Goncharov A., Taru H., Ellisman M. H., et al. , 2013. Liprin-alpha/SYD-2 determines the size of dense projections in presynaptic active zones in C. elegans. J. Cell Biol. 203: 849–863. 10.1083/jcb.201302022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klassen M. P., Shen K., 2007. Wnt signaling positions neuromuscular connectivity by inhibiting synapse formation in C. elegans. Cell 130: 704–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landis D. M., Hall A. K., Weinstein L. A., Reese T. S., 1988. The organization of cytoplasm at the presynaptic active zone of a central nervous system synapse. Neuron 1: 201–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levitan E. S., 2008. Signaling for vesicle mobilization and synaptic plasticity. Mol. Neurobiol. 37: 39–43. 10.1007/s12035-008-8014-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L., Tian X., Zhu M., Bulgari D., Bohme M. A., et al. , 2014. Drosophila Syd-1, liprin-alpha, and protein phosphatase 2A B’ subunit Wrd function in a linear pathway to prevent ectopic accumulation of synaptic materials in distal axons. J. Neurosci. 34: 8474–8487. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mello C. C., Kramer J. M., Stinchcomb D., Ambros V., 1991. Efficient gene transfer in C. elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10: 3959–3970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller K. E., DeProto J., Kaufmann N., Patel B. N., Duckworth A., et al. , 2005. Direct observation demonstrates that Liprin-alpha is required for trafficking of synaptic vesicles. Curr. Biol. 15: 684–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller K. G., 2017. Keeping neuronal cargoes on the right track: new insights into regulators of axonal transport. Neuroscientist 23: 232–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller K. G., Alfonso A., Nguyen M., Crowell J. A., Johnson C. D., et al. , 1996. A genetic selection for Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic transmission mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12593–12598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller K. G., Emerson M. D., Rand J. B., 1999. Goalpha and diacylglycerol kinase negatively regulate the Gqalpha pathway in C. elegans. Neuron 24: 323–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison L. M., Edwards S. L., Manning L., Stec N., Richmond J. E., et al. , 2018. Sentryn and SAD Kinase Link the Guided Transport and Capture of Dense Core Vesicles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 210: 925–946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicholls J. G., 2012. From Neuron to Brain. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. [Google Scholar]
- Ou C. Y., Poon V. Y., Maeder C. I., Watanabe S., Lehrman E. K., et al. , 2010. Two cyclin-dependent kinase pathways are essential for polarized trafficking of presynaptic components. Cell 141: 846–858. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owald D., Fouquet W., Schmidt M., Wichmann C., Mertel S., et al. , 2010. A Syd-1 homologue regulates pre- and postsynaptic maturation in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 188: 565–579. 10.1083/jcb.200908055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paix A., Wang Y., Smith H. E., Lee C. Y., Calidas D., et al. , 2014. Scalable and versatile genome editing using linear DNAs with microhomology to Cas9 sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 198: 1347–1356. 10.1534/genetics.114.170423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel M. R., Lehrman E. K., Poon V. Y., Crump J. G., Zhen M., et al. , 2006. Hierarchical assembly of presynaptic components in defined C. elegans synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 9: 1488–1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds N. K., Schade M. A., Miller K. G., 2005. Convergent, RIC-8-dependent Galpha signaling pathways in the Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic signaling network. Genetics 169: 651–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schade M. A., Reynolds N. K., Dollins C. M., Miller K. G., 2005. Mutations that rescue the paralysis of Caenorhabditis elegans ric-8 (synembryn) mutants activate the G alpha(s) pathway and define a third major branch of the synaptic signaling network. Genetics 169: 631–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siksou L., Rostaing P., Lechaire J. P., Boudier T., Ohtsuka T., et al. , 2007. Three-dimensional architecture of presynaptic terminal cytomatrix. J. Neurosci. 27: 6868–6877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sossin W. S., Scheller R. H., 1991. Biosynthesis and sorting of neuropeptides. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1: 79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiernagle T., 2006. Maintenance of C. elegans (February 11, 2006), WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, /10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1, http://www.wormbook.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stigloher C., Zhan H., Zhen M., Richmond J., Bessereau J. L., 2011. The presynaptic dense projection of the Caenorhabditis elegans cholinergic neuromuscular junction localizes synaptic vesicles at the active zone through SYD-2/liprin and UNC-10/RIM-dependent interactions. J. Neurosci. 31: 4388–4396. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6164-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sudhof T. C., 2012. The presynaptic active zone. Neuron 75: 11–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulston J., Hodgkin J., 1988. Methods, pp. 596–597 in The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, edited by Wood W. B. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner O. I., Esposito A., Kohler B., Chen C. W., Shen C. P., et al. , 2009. Synaptic scaffolding protein SYD-2 clusters and activates kinesin-3 UNC-104 in C. elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19605–19610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S. S. H., Held R. G., Wong M. Y., Liu C., Karakhanyan A., et al. , 2016. Fusion competent synaptic vesicles persist upon active zone disruption and loss of vesicle docking. Neuron 91: 777–791. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weimer R. M., 2006. Preservation of C. elegans tissue via high-pressure freezing and freeze-substitution for ultrastructural analysis and immunocytochemistry. Methods Mol. Biol. 351: 203–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weimer R. M., Gracheva E. O., Meyrignac O., Miller K. G., Richmond J. E., et al. , 2006. UNC-13 and UNC-10/rim localize synaptic vesicles to specific membrane domains. J. Neurosci. 26: 8040–8047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White J. G., Southgate E., Thomson J. N., Brenner S., 1986. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314: 1–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Y. E., Huo L., Maeder C. I., Feng W., Shen K., 2013. The balance between capture and dissociation of presynaptic proteins controls the spatial distribution of synapses. Neuron 78: 994–1011. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xuan Z., Manning L., Nelson J., Richmond J. E., Colon-Ramos D. A., et al. , 2017. Clarinet (CLA-1), a novel active zone protein required for synaptic vesicle clustering and release. eLife 6: pii: e29276 10.7554/eLife.29276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan J., Chao D. L., Toba S., Koyasako K., Yasunaga T., et al. , 2013. Kinesin-1 regulates dendrite microtubule polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans. eLife 2: e00133 10.7554/eLife.00133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeh E., Kawano T., Weimer R. M., Bessereau J. L., Zhen M., 2005. Identification of genes involved in synaptogenesis using a fluorescent active zone marker in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 25: 3833–3841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhen M., Jin Y., 1999. The liprin protein SYD-2 regulates the differentiation of presynaptic termini in C. elegans. Nature 401: 371–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Q., Ahlawat S., Schaefer A., Mahoney T., Koushika S. P., et al. , 2014. The vesicle protein SAM-4 regulates the processivity of synaptic vesicle transport. PLoS Genet. 10: e1004644 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Strains and plasmids are available upon request from the corresponding author, from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, or from AddGene. The authors affirm that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions of the article are present within the article, figures, and tables. Supplemental files available at FigShare. File S1 contains Figures S1–S6, Tables S1–S4, Supplemental Materials and Methods and Supplemental Material References. Supplemental material available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.25386/genetics.6965732.