The crystal structure of the title salt, (C6H16N)2[MoO4], results from N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonded rings formed through interconnections between the (iPr2NH2)+ cations and [MoO4]2− anions.
Keywords: crystal structure, organic-inorganic salt, molybdate anion, N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding, graph set notation
Abstract
The organic–inorganic title salt, (C6H16N)2[MoO4] or (iPr2NH2)2[MoO4], was obtained by reacting MoO3 with diisopropylamine in a 1:2 molar ratio in water. The molybdate anion is located on a twofold rotation axis and exhibits a slightly distorted tetrahedral configuration. In the crystal structure, the diisopropylammmonium (iPr2NH2)+ cations and [MoO4]2− anions are linked to each other through N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating rings with R 12 12(36) motifs that give rise to the formation of a three-dimensional network. The structure was refined taking into account inversion twinning (ratio of ca 4:1 between the two domains).
Chemical context
As a result of the photochromic properties of alkylammonium molybdates (Arnaud-Neu & Schwing-Weill, 1974 ▸), molybdenum chemistry is an exciting research area. A large variety of oxidoanions based on molybdenum have been synthesized and characterized with numerous counter-cations. Among these, mononuclear and binuclear anions as well as polyoxidomolybdates with a much higher nuclearity are known (Gatehouse & Leverett, 1969 ▸; Matsumoto et al. 1975 ▸; Modec et al., 2004 ▸; Müller & Gouzerh, 2012 ▸; Pouye et al., 2014 ▸; Sarr et al., 2018 ▸). Salts containing the tetrahedral molybdate anion [MoO4]2– combined with cations such as K+, Na+, (CH6N3)+, ((C6H11)2NH2)+, (NH3(CH2)2NH3)+, (OHRNH3)+ and (CyNH2)+ have been isolated in the past (Gatehouse & Leverett, 1969 ▸; Matsumoto et al., 1975 ▸; Ozeki et al., 1987 ▸; Thiele & Fuchs, 1979 ▸; Bensch et al., 1987 ▸; Sheikhshoaie & Ghazizadeh, 2013 ▸; Pouye et al., 2014 ▸), but never with the diisopropylammonium cation (iPr2NH2)+. In a continuation of our work on molybdenum compounds with organic cations, we report here the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (iPr2NH2)2[MoO4], (I).
Structural commentary
The asymmetric unit of (I) comprises one (iPr2NH2)+ cation and an {MoO2} entity (Fig. 1 ▸). The [MoO4]2– molybdate anion is completed by application of twofold rotation symmetry. The two Mo—O distances are 1.732 (2) and 1.7505 (15) Å and the O—Mo—O angles vary in a narrow range between 108.77 (10) and 110.7 (2)° (Table 1 ▸), revealing only slight distortions from ideal values. Similar bond lengths and angles for the molybdate anion were reported in previous studies (Ozeki et al., 1987 ▸; Bensch et al., 1987 ▸; Sheikhshoaie & Ghazizadeh, 2013 ▸; Pouye et al., 2014 ▸) where the Mo—O distances vary between 1.749 (2) and 1.776 (3) Å, and the O—Mo—O angles between 106.85 (4) and 113.2 (1)°.
Figure 1.
Asymmetric unit view of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level and hydrogen atoms as spheres of arbitrary radius.
Table 1. Selected bond angles (°).
| O1i—Mo1—O1 | 110.33 (12) | O2—Mo1—O1 | 108.77 (10) |
| O2—Mo1—O1i | 109.13 (11) | O2i—Mo1—O2 | 110.7 (2) |
Symmetry code: (i)
.
In the crystal structure of (CyNH2)2MoO4·2H2O (Cy = cyclohexyl; Pouye et al., 2014 ▸) the four Mo—O bond lengths are equal with 1.7613 (12) Å. Although in this structure similar N—H⋯O intermolecular interactions between the (CyNH2)+ cation and the molybdate anion are present in comparison with the (iPr2NH2)+ cation in the title compound, the small differences in the hydrogen-bonding pattern result in slightly different Mo—O bond lengths between the two structures. On one hand this may be related to the presence of additional water molecules in (CyNH2)2MoO4·2H2O, on the other hand to steric hindrance between the four diisopropylammonium cations that surround each molybdate anion in (I). At least the strengths of the N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds do not seem to have a noticeable effect on the different Mo—O distances in (I). Both hydrogen bonds are very similar in terms of N⋯O distances and N—H⋯O angles (Table 2 ▸).
Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).
| D—H⋯A | D—H | H⋯A | D⋯A | D—H⋯A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1—H1A⋯O2 | 0.89 | 1.80 | 2.684 (3) | 170 |
| N1—H1B⋯O1ii | 0.89 | 1.81 | 2.695 (2) | 174 |
Symmetry code: (ii)
.
Supramolecular features
In the crystal structure of (I), each [MoO4]2– anion is linked to two pairs of symmetry-related diisopropylammonium cations through N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 2 ▸). Contrariwise, each (iPr2NH2)+ cation is linked to two molybdate [MoO4]2− anions. The interaction of six molybdate anions with six diisopropylammonium cations leads to {(iPr2NH2)⋯MoO4}6 ring systems with an
(36) motif (Etter et al., 1990 ▸). Each ring is linked to six adjacent rings giving rise to infinite layers extending parallel to (010) (Fig. 2 ▸). The connection of the rings into a three-dimensional network structure perpendicular to this plane is shown in Fig. 3 ▸.
Figure 2.
The N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding network in (I) (turquoise dashed lines) in a view approximately along [010].
Figure 3.
The N—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding network in (I) (turquoise dashed lines) in a view approximately along [001].
Database survey
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.39 plus 1 update, November 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) revealed 226 entries dealing with (iPr2NH2)+ cations while 32 entries contained the [MoO4]2− molybdate anion.
Synthesis and crystallization
Compound (I) was obtained from a mixture of molybdenum trioxide (3.2 g, 22.23 mmol) and diisopropylamine (4 g, 44.46 mmol) in a 1:2 molar ratio in water. A clear, colourless solution was obtained after stirring for approximately one h. After twenty days of evaporation in an oven at 333 K, some colourless single crystals were obtained.
In the IR spectrum of (I) (Fig. 4 ▸ a), the bands at 899 and 786 cm−1 can be attributed to symmetric and asymmetric Mo—O stretching modes, respectively. The disopropylammonium cation is characterized by a series of vibrational bands in the 3000–2200 cm−1 region, which can be attributed to ν(N—H), ν(C—H) and combination modes. The δ(N—H) bending vibrations probably contribute to the signal observed at 1598 cm−1.
Figure 4.
IR (a) and Raman (b) spectra of (I).
In the Raman spectrum of (I) (Fig. 4 ▸ b), the band at 797 cm−1 is attributed to the antisymmetric stretching mode of the [MoO4]2− molybdate anion. The symmetric vibration, νs(Mo—O), in the form of a weak shoulder at 839 cm−1 in the infrared spectrum, is very intense in the Raman spectrum at 896 cm−1. In the high wavenumber region of the Raman spectrum, the bands between 3000 and 2800 cm−1 can be assigned to the ν(N—H) and ν(C—H) stretching vibrations of the diisopropylammonium cation.
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The structure was refined taking into account twinning by inversion (ratio of ca 4:1 between the two domains). H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with N—H distances of 0.89 Å and C—H distances of 0.96 Å for methyl and of 0.98 Å for methylene groups, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2U eq(C,N) or 1.5U eq(Cmethyl).
Table 3. Experimental details.
| Crystal data | |
| Chemical formula | (C6H16N)2[MoO4] |
| M r | 364.33 |
| Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, P43212 |
| Temperature (K) | 293 |
| a, c (Å) | 9.0166 (1), 23.1158 (3) |
| V (Å3) | 1879.29 (5) |
| Z | 4 |
| Radiation type | Mo Kα |
| μ (mm−1) | 0.71 |
| Crystal size (mm) | 0.38 × 0.26 × 0.1 |
| Data collection | |
| Diffractometer | Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova, Dual, Cu at zero, AtlasS2 |
| Absorption correction | Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2015 ▸) |
| T min, T max | 0.612, 1.000 |
| No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 111277, 2156, 2109 |
| R int | 0.055 |
| (sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.650 |
| Refinement | |
| R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S | 0.019, 0.049, 1.12 |
| No. of reflections | 2156 |
| No. of parameters | 92 |
| H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
| Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.21, −0.31 |
| Absolute structure | Refined as an inversion twin |
| Absolute structure parameter | 0.19 (7) |
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014755/wm5465sup1.cif
CCDC reference: 1874215
Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal, the Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique des Matériaux (LCPM) de l’Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor, Sénégal, the CNRS and Université de Strasbourg, France, the Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, FSCM, Spectropole, Marseille, France and the ICMUB-UMR 6302, Dijon, France for financial support.
supplementary crystallographic information
Crystal data
| (C6H16N)2[MoO4] | Dx = 1.288 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 364.33 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Tetragonal, P43212 | Cell parameters from 49023 reflections |
| a = 9.0166 (1) Å | θ = 3.6–27.7° |
| c = 23.1158 (3) Å | µ = 0.71 mm−1 |
| V = 1879.29 (5) Å3 | T = 293 K |
| Z = 4 | Prism, clear light colourless |
| F(000) = 768 | 0.38 × 0.26 × 0.1 mm |
Data collection
| Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova, Dual, Cu at zero, AtlasS2 diffractometer | 2109 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Detector resolution: 5.3048 pixels mm-1 | Rint = 0.055 |
| ω scans | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2015) | h = −11→11 |
| Tmin = 0.612, Tmax = 1.000 | k = −11→11 |
| 111277 measured reflections | l = −29→30 |
| 2156 independent reflections |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| Least-squares matrix: full | H-atom parameters constrained |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0245P)2 + 0.4149P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| wR(F2) = 0.049 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| S = 1.12 | Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3 |
| 2156 reflections | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
| 92 parameters | Absolute structure: Refined as an inversion twin |
| 0 restraints | Absolute structure parameter: 0.19 (7) |
Special details
| Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refined as a 2-component inversion twin. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| N1 | 0.6950 (2) | 0.2985 (3) | 0.57328 (7) | 0.0451 (5) | |
| H1A | 0.607999 | 0.280281 | 0.556562 | 0.054* | |
| H1B | 0.681809 | 0.289840 | 0.611289 | 0.054* | |
| C1 | 0.8015 (3) | 0.1790 (4) | 0.55462 (12) | 0.0603 (7) | |
| H1 | 0.897057 | 0.196363 | 0.573616 | 0.072* | |
| C2 | 0.7411 (5) | 0.0325 (4) | 0.57499 (18) | 0.0827 (10) | |
| H2A | 0.725309 | 0.036136 | 0.616035 | 0.124* | |
| H2B | 0.810811 | −0.044698 | 0.566106 | 0.124* | |
| H2C | 0.648792 | 0.012618 | 0.555832 | 0.124* | |
| C3 | 0.8245 (4) | 0.1852 (5) | 0.48930 (13) | 0.0872 (11) | |
| H3A | 0.731448 | 0.169286 | 0.470093 | 0.131* | |
| H3B | 0.893498 | 0.109574 | 0.477926 | 0.131* | |
| H3C | 0.863030 | 0.280735 | 0.478768 | 0.131* | |
| C4 | 0.7349 (4) | 0.4560 (3) | 0.56091 (11) | 0.0590 (7) | |
| H4 | 0.745520 | 0.468318 | 0.518986 | 0.071* | |
| C5 | 0.8813 (4) | 0.4960 (4) | 0.58963 (15) | 0.0750 (10) | |
| H5A | 0.876969 | 0.471035 | 0.629966 | 0.112* | |
| H5B | 0.899069 | 0.600390 | 0.585479 | 0.112* | |
| H5C | 0.960302 | 0.441624 | 0.571562 | 0.112* | |
| C6 | 0.6069 (4) | 0.5518 (4) | 0.58154 (14) | 0.0735 (10) | |
| H6A | 0.518209 | 0.524379 | 0.561190 | 0.110* | |
| H6B | 0.628992 | 0.654184 | 0.574169 | 0.110* | |
| H6C | 0.592529 | 0.537236 | 0.622295 | 0.110* | |
| Mo1 | 0.26396 (2) | 0.26396 (2) | 0.500000 | 0.03021 (9) | |
| O1 | 0.2086 (2) | 0.1625 (2) | 0.43916 (6) | 0.0510 (5) | |
| O2 | 0.4506 (2) | 0.2317 (4) | 0.51236 (10) | 0.0959 (9) |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| N1 | 0.0337 (9) | 0.0747 (15) | 0.0269 (8) | 0.0005 (9) | −0.0009 (7) | −0.0005 (9) |
| C1 | 0.0350 (13) | 0.095 (2) | 0.0510 (15) | 0.0047 (13) | 0.0011 (11) | −0.0167 (15) |
| C2 | 0.069 (2) | 0.075 (2) | 0.104 (3) | 0.006 (2) | 0.010 (2) | −0.016 (2) |
| C3 | 0.070 (2) | 0.138 (3) | 0.0536 (17) | 0.007 (2) | 0.0170 (16) | −0.026 (2) |
| C4 | 0.0638 (19) | 0.0767 (18) | 0.0364 (12) | −0.0047 (17) | −0.0013 (14) | 0.0133 (12) |
| C5 | 0.064 (2) | 0.083 (3) | 0.078 (2) | −0.0223 (18) | −0.0017 (18) | 0.003 (2) |
| C6 | 0.086 (2) | 0.071 (2) | 0.0631 (18) | 0.0121 (18) | −0.0156 (17) | 0.0083 (17) |
| Mo1 | 0.03380 (10) | 0.03380 (10) | 0.02304 (12) | −0.00356 (9) | −0.00072 (6) | 0.00072 (6) |
| O1 | 0.0687 (12) | 0.0566 (10) | 0.0277 (7) | −0.0072 (9) | −0.0063 (7) | −0.0049 (7) |
| O2 | 0.0350 (9) | 0.178 (3) | 0.0751 (14) | 0.0026 (14) | −0.0119 (9) | −0.0308 (18) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
| N1—H1A | 0.8900 | C4—H4 | 0.9800 |
| N1—H1B | 0.8900 | C4—C5 | 1.521 (5) |
| N1—C1 | 1.506 (4) | C4—C6 | 1.518 (5) |
| N1—C4 | 1.493 (4) | C5—H5A | 0.9600 |
| C1—H1 | 0.9800 | C5—H5B | 0.9600 |
| C1—C2 | 1.504 (5) | C5—H5C | 0.9600 |
| C1—C3 | 1.525 (4) | C6—H6A | 0.9600 |
| C2—H2A | 0.9600 | C6—H6B | 0.9600 |
| C2—H2B | 0.9600 | C6—H6C | 0.9600 |
| C2—H2C | 0.9600 | Mo1—O1 | 1.7505 (15) |
| C3—H3A | 0.9600 | Mo1—O1i | 1.7504 (15) |
| C3—H3B | 0.9600 | Mo1—O2 | 1.732 (2) |
| C3—H3C | 0.9600 | Mo1—O2i | 1.732 (2) |
| H1A—N1—H1B | 107.1 | N1—C4—H4 | 108.7 |
| C1—N1—H1A | 107.8 | N1—C4—C5 | 110.5 (2) |
| C1—N1—H1B | 107.8 | N1—C4—C6 | 107.3 (3) |
| C4—N1—H1A | 107.8 | C5—C4—H4 | 108.7 |
| C4—N1—H1B | 107.8 | C6—C4—H4 | 108.7 |
| C4—N1—C1 | 118.2 (2) | C6—C4—C5 | 112.9 (3) |
| N1—C1—H1 | 108.5 | C4—C5—H5A | 109.5 |
| N1—C1—C3 | 110.1 (3) | C4—C5—H5B | 109.5 |
| C2—C1—N1 | 108.0 (3) | C4—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
| C2—C1—H1 | 108.5 | H5A—C5—H5B | 109.5 |
| C2—C1—C3 | 113.0 (3) | H5A—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
| C3—C1—H1 | 108.5 | H5B—C5—H5C | 109.5 |
| C1—C2—H2A | 109.5 | C4—C6—H6A | 109.5 |
| C1—C2—H2B | 109.5 | C4—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
| C1—C2—H2C | 109.5 | C4—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
| H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 | H6A—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
| H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 | H6A—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
| H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 | H6B—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
| C1—C3—H3A | 109.5 | O1i—Mo1—O1 | 110.33 (12) |
| C1—C3—H3B | 109.5 | O2i—Mo1—O1 | 109.13 (11) |
| C1—C3—H3C | 109.5 | O2—Mo1—O1i | 109.13 (11) |
| H3A—C3—H3B | 109.5 | O2—Mo1—O1 | 108.77 (10) |
| H3A—C3—H3C | 109.5 | O2i—Mo1—O1i | 108.77 (10) |
| H3B—C3—H3C | 109.5 | O2i—Mo1—O2 | 110.7 (2) |
| C1—N1—C4—C5 | −59.1 (3) | C4—N1—C1—C2 | 176.6 (2) |
| C1—N1—C4—C6 | 177.5 (2) | C4—N1—C1—C3 | −59.5 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, −z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N1—H1A···O2 | 0.89 | 1.80 | 2.684 (3) | 170 |
| N1—H1B···O1ii | 0.89 | 1.81 | 2.695 (2) | 174 |
Symmetry code: (ii) y+1/2, −x+1/2, z+1/4.
References
- Arnaud-Neu, F. & Schwing-Weill, M. J. (1974). J. Less-Common Met. 36, 71–78.
- Bensch, W., Hug, P., Emmenegger, R., Reller, A. & Oswald, H. R. (1987). Mater. Res. Bull. 22, 447–454.
- Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
- Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Gatehouse, B. M. & Leverett, P. (1969). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 849–854.
- Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Matsumoto, K. Y., Kobayashi, A. & Sasaki, Y. (1975). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 48, 1009–1013.
- Modec, B., Brenčič, J. V. & Koller, J. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1611–1620.
- Müller, A. & Gouzerh, P. (2012). Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7431–7463. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ozeki, T., Ichida, H. & Sasaki, Y. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 2220–2221.
- Pouye, S. F., Cissé, I., Diop, L., Molloy, K. C. & Kociok-Kohn, G. (2014). Sci. Study Res.: Chem. Chem. Eng., Biotechnol., Food Ind. (Univ. Bacau), 15, 091–094.
- Rigaku OD (2015). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.
- Sarr, B., Diop, C. A. K., Melin, F., Sidibe, M., Hellwig, P., Michaud, F., Maury, F., Senocq, F., Mbaye, A. & Rousselin, Y. (2018). J. Mol. Struct. 1170, 44–50.
- Sheikhshoaie, I. & Ghazizadeh, M. (2013). Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 27, 69–76.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
- Thiele, A. & Fuchs, J. (1979). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 34, 145–154.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018014755/wm5465sup1.cif
CCDC reference: 1874215
Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report




