Abstract
Mobility of proteins and lipids plays a major role in physiological processes. Platforms which were developed to study protein interaction between immobilized and mobile proteins suffer from shortcomings such as fluorescence quenching or complicated fabrication methods. Here we report a versatile platform comprising immobilized histidine-tagged proteins and biotinylated proteins in a mobile phase. Importantly, multiphoton photolithography was used for easy and fast fabrication of the platform and allows, in principle, extension of its application to three dimensions. The platform, which is made up of functionalized polymer structures embedded in a mobile lipid bilayer, shows low background fluorescence and allows for mobility of arbitrary proteins.
Restrictions in lateral mobility of lipids and proteins in the cell membrane have significant impact on physiological processes. Cell–cell interactions, protein binding, cell signaling, and molecular transport, for example, depend on the mobility of cells and proteins.1−6 Migration or accumulation of proteins and lipids in cell membranes leads to membrane heterogeneities which effect biochemical processes and mechanical properties of membranes.7 One possibility to mimic such heterogeneities is the construction of artificial platforms which allow separation of two mobile phases or the introduction of a mobile and an immobile phase. In the past, introduction of barriers within an artificial lipid bilayer was realized by using different micro- and nanostructures made of polymers, alumina, gold or TiO2,8−10 chromium,11 nanoimprinting of albumin,12 patterning substrates with femtosecond lasers,13 scanning probe lithography,14 or nanopatterned graphene.15 Furthermore, platforms comprising two different mobile phases were demonstrated.11,16 These geometrically confined supported lipid bilayers found application in studying physiological processes e.g. in leukemia cell studies,17 T cell signaling,18−20 or the phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor.21
In addition to membrane proteins with mobility around the nanopatterned substrates, fixed proteins anchored to the substrate via well-defined linkers are equally important for physiological studies. Such anchoring can be achieved, for instance, via dip-pen nanolithography,22 gold nanoparticles,23,24 nanoimprint lithography,25,26 e-beam lithography,27,28 or multiphoton and stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanolithography.29,30 Physiological applications comprise integrin activation for focal adhesion sites,23,31 studies on T cell organization and signaling,32,33 or investigations of lipid organization in ordered domains in living cells.34
The natural extension of applying either mobile proteins on lipid membranes or proteins fixed to micro- and nanostructures on a substrate is to use a hybrid protein platform providing both phases, a mobile one flowing around a fixed one. This was anticipated by Kung et al.,12 Smith et al.,13 and Shi et al.14 although only demonstrated for inactive albumin as fixed protein. Some important physiological studies using functional fixed and functional mobile proteins were reported recently. The groups of Groves and Salaita for example studied epidermal growth factors on breast cancer cells,35−37 while most recently T cell receptor triggering was successfully investigated by using a hybrid platform.38 In most of these studies gold nanoparticles were used to tie down the proteins in the fixed phase,35,36,38 with the disadvantage of fluorescence quenching by gold particles which hampers optical readout.39 Although very small protein anchors of ∼6 nm can be realized, self-assembly of gold nanoparticles as used by Lohmüller et al.35,36 or Deeg et al.40 is limited to periodic, mostly hexagonal patterns. TiO2 circumvents fluorescence quenching,10 but the self-assembled pattern is again hexagonal. Other techniques, which overcome the disadvantages of inflexibility in pattern design, were applied but show shortcomings in fabrication speed and cost. E-beam lithography38 for example provides full flexibility in two and 2.5 dimensions but is a cost intensive technique, while dip-pen lithography37 shows limited flexibility and is a rather slow fabrication method. Clearly, there is a demand for alternative hybrid platforms comprising mobile and immobile proteins which show full flexibility in platform design as well as fast and cheap fabrication and ideally account for excellent optical readout. This is especially of interest, since the present physiological studies are just the beginning of possible applications.
In this Technical Note, we demonstrate a versatile hybrid platform which allows pinning of two different proteins, one in a mobile lipid bilayer and one immobilized on polymer nanostructures. Importantly, the nanostructures are fabricated by multiphoton photolithography (MPP)41,42 which allows for cheap and fast processing and, in principle, extension of the platform in three dimensions.43 The polymer structures are written by MPP in a functional acrylate resin and serve as anchor points for arbitrary histidine-tagged proteins. The mobile phase in which the acrylate structures are embedded is made of a biotin spiked lipid bilayer and can be loaded with arbitrary biotinylated proteins. Thus, the two different immobilization mechanisms via histidine tags on the immobile phase and the streptavidin bound to the biotinylated lipid bilayer allow for orthogonal immobilization of proteins. Additionally, the polymer structure is transparent and shows negligible background fluorescence, which facilitates optical readout.
Experimental Section
MPP allows for maskless fabrication of two- and three-dimensional polymer structures with feature sizes down to 100 nm41,42,44−46 and a lateral resolution around 200 nm.47 Carboxy-functional polymer structures can be written using a photoresist consisting of a carboxy-modified acrylate and a photoinitiator.48 The monomers are pentaerythritol triacrylate (PETA, Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA) and 20 wt % 2-carboxyethyl acrylate (CEA, Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA). One wt % Irgacure 819 (IC 819, BASF Schweiz AG, Switzerland) was added as photoinitiator. For control measurements, structures without carboxy-functionality were fabricated using pure PETA with 1 wt % of IC 819. The chemical structures of the photoresist ingredients as well as detailed information about the experimental design and the sample preparation can be found in the Supporting Information.
After fabrication and development, the polymer structures were cleaned by rinsing with ethanol and incubation with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid buffer. 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine vesicles (POPC, Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., USA)49,30 with 4 wt % of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N (cap biotinyl) (sodium salt) (16:0 Biotinyl Cap PE, Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., USA) were sonicated for 20 min and incubated for another 20 min, leading to a biotin-modified supported lipid bilayer enclosing but not covering the previously fabricated polymer anchors (see Figure 1a).8,30,48,50,51 After washing with 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (pH 7.5, 50 mM), the carboxy groups on the polymer anchors were converted to N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters (Figure 1b). After a second washing step, amino-labeled nitrilotriacetic acid (NH2–NTA) was covalently bound to the NHS esters (Figure 1c). After further washing, an aqueous solution of nickel(II) chloride was added.28,52,53 To ensure binding specificity of histidine-tags to Ni-NTA, the eventually remaining carboxy groups and NHS esters were blocked using albumin. The chelation of nickel ions and the passivation with albumin is shown in Figure 1d. Subsequently, we added histidine-tagged photoswitchable monomeric protein orange (PSmOrange) (Figure 1e) or histidine-tagged emerald green fluorescent protein (EmGFP). Then, fluorescently labeled streptavidin was added and attached to the biotin within the lipid bilayer (Figure 1f).54 The immobilization of histidine-tagged EmGFP or PSmOrange to the carboxy-functional acrylate structure via Ni-NTA interaction as well as binding of Alexa Fluor 555 labeled streptavidin to the lipid bilayer was analyzed via fluorescence microscopy using excitation wavelengths of 491 nm, 642 nm, and 532 nm, respectively. The photoinitiator IC 819 used in writing the polymer structures shows a negligible fluorescence signal at excitation with 491 nm, 532 nm, or 642 nm.30 The chemical structures of the molecules used for protein anchoring can be found in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Protein Immobilization
The selectivity of histidine-tag mediated protein binding via Ni-NTA to carboxy-functional acrylate structures is shown by comparing EmGFP binding to polymer grids with and without carboxy-functionality, offset by half a period in both lateral directions (see the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure 2a). The polymer lines have line widths of about 130 nm. The weak fluorescence signal of the polymer lines fabricated with pure PETA stems from autofluorescence of the structure and unspecifically bound proteins. Fluorescence of the Ni-NTA-functional polymer grid is about 10 times higher compared to the fluorescence from the pure PETA grid (Figure 2b). Additional data from control experiments are shown in the Supporting Information.
Hybrid Protein Platform
The carboxy-functional polymer anchors have diameters of about 100 nm. First, the fluorescent histidine-tagged protein PSmOrange was immobilized on polymer anchors following the strategy shown in Figure 1(a-e). Subsequently, streptavidin labeled with Alexa Fluor 555 was adhered to the biotin-spiked POPC bilayer as sketched in Figure 1f. Figure 3a shows a fluorescence image of the carboxy-acrylate dots with immobilized histidine-tagged PSmOrange (excitation wavelength 642 nm). The fluorescent proteins bind to the polymer anchors. Fluorescence from the Alexa Fluor 555 labeled streptavidin, adhered to the lipid bilayer, is shown in Figure 3b (excitation wavelength 532 nm). Figure 3c shows an overlay of both images. A movie of Alexa Fluor 555 labeled streptavidin diffusing around the fixed PSmOrange can be found in the Supporting Information. In order to quantify the two-dimensional movement of the streptavidin within the bilayer, trajectories were analyzed (Figure 3d). To determine the diffusion constant, a mean square displacement (MSD) statistic (Figure 3e) was applied. The diffusion constant was determined applying a two-dimensional model of free diffusion with MSD(t) = MSD0 + 4Dt (solid line), fitted using the first three points in the MSD(t) plot.49 The resulting mean square displacement versus time plot yields a diffusion constant of D = 0.38 ± 0.09 μm2/s. The offset MSD0 of the linear fit in the MSD(t)-plot corresponds to a positional accuracy of 193 nm.
Conclusions
In conclusion, a platform for binding of two different proteins, one diffusing on a supported lipid bilayer and the other fixed to acrylate anchors, is presented. Two different types of fluorescent proteins (EmGFP or PSmOrange) were specifically immobilized on acrylate structures of about 100 nm in size, bearing carboxy-functionality which is further converted to provide specific Ni-NTA/histidine-tag interaction. Another protein (Alexa Fluor 555 labeled streptavidin) is bound to a lipid bilayer, spiked with biotinylated lipids and surrounding the acrylate anchors. The streptavidin is moving within the lipid bilayer, flowing around the fixed fluorescent proteins. This two-component system, combining both, a mobile and an immobile fraction of different proteins, is well suited for the analysis of protein–protein interactions in living cells. Acrylate protein anchors show much less fluorescence quenching than gold nanoparticles, which have been used in previous platforms for two-phase protein binding. The versatile platform allows immobilization of any histidine-tagged protein to the NTA binding sites as well as incorporation of any biotinylated protein in the mobile phase.55 Importantly, the histidine-tag and the biotin–streptavidin linkage is independent, hence binding of two different types of proteins, one mobile, one fixed, should be easily achievable for a wide range of physiological problems. This extends the applicability of this hybrid protein platform way beyond the two previously described examples of studies on epidermal growth factors35−37 or T cell signaling.38 In comparison to e.g. e-beam lithography, MPP is less cost-intensive and provides three-dimensional writing capability. Further, it is thinkable, that using STED lithography the structure size could be reduced to lateral sizes of around 60 nm.48,56 The height of the polymer structures can be varied from 20 nm (MPP) down to 10 nm (STED lithography).29 We previously showed that 80% of nanoanchors (size about 60 nm) can carry only one antibody.29 Hence, an application for direct protein–protein interaction can be expected.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Heidi Piglmayer-Brezina, Bernhard Fragner, and Alfred Nimmervoll for technical support. The work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project P26461 and Interreg ATCZ14. M.A. has been supported by Austrian Science Fund Project P29110-B21.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02588.
Description of the experimental setups for fabrication and imaging, chemical structures of the photoresist components and sample preparation, chemical structures and materials for protein binding experiments, control experiments, and characterization of the supported lipid bilayer on differently treated substrates (PDF)
Movie of moving streptavidin proteins surrounding the immobilized histidine-tagged fluorescent proteins on polymer anchors (AVI)
Author Present Address
† Department of Chemistry, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Vereb G.; Szöllosi J.; Matkó J.; Nagy P.; Farkas T.; Vigh L.; Mátyus L.; Waldmann T. A.; Damjanovich S. Dynamic, yet structured: The cell membrane three decades after the Singer-Nicolson model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100 (14), 8053–8058. 10.1073/pnas.1332550100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engel A.; Gaub H. E. Structure and mechanics of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 127–148. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.154450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snider J.; Kittanakom S.; Damjanovic D.; Curak J.; Wong V.; Stagljar I. Detecting interactions with membrane proteins using a membrane two-hybrid assay in yeast. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5 (7), 1281–1293. 10.1038/nprot.2010.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engelman D. M. Membranes are more mosaic than fluid. Nature 2005, 438 (7068), 578–580. 10.1038/nature04394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simons K.; Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 1997, 387 (6633), 569–572. 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cordwell S. J.; Thingholm T. E. Technologies for plasma membrane proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10 (4), 611–627. 10.1002/pmic.200900521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damjanovich S.; Gáspár R.; Pieri C. Dynamic receptor superstructures at the plasma membrane. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1997, 30 (1), 67–106. 10.1017/S0033583596003307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groves J. T.; Ulman N.; Boxer S. G. Micropatterning fluid lipid bilayers on solid supports. Science 1997, 275 (5300), 651–653. 10.1126/science.275.5300.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai H.; Wolfenson H.; Depoil D.; Dustin M. L.; Sheetz M. P.; Wind S. J. Molecular Occupancy of Nanodot Arrays. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (4), 4173–4183. 10.1021/acsnano.5b07425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guasch J.; Diemer J.; Riahinezhad H.; Neubauer S.; Kessler H.; Spatz J. P. Synthesis of Binary Nanopatterns on Hydrogels for Initiating Cellular Responses. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28 (6), 1806–1815. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04910. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson B. L.; Groves J. T. Scanning probe lithography on fluid lipid membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (43), 13878–13879. 10.1021/ja046040a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kung L. A.; Kam L.; Hovis J. S.; Boxer S. G. Patterning Hybrid Surfaces of Proteins and Supported Lipid Bilayers. Langmuir 2000, 16 (17), 6773–6776. 10.1021/la000653t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smith A. M.; Huser T.; Parikh A. N. Dynamic recompartmentalization of supported lipid bilayers using focused femtosecond laser pulses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (9), 2422–2423. 10.1021/ja065626p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi J.; Chen J.; Cremer P. S. Sub-100 nm patterning of supported bilayers by nanoshaving lithography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (9), 2718–2719. 10.1021/ja077730s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W.; Chung J. K.; Lee Y. K.; Groves J. T. Graphene-Templated Supported Lipid Bilayer Nanochannels. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (8), 5022–5026. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekula S.; Fuchs J.; Weg-Remers S.; Nagel P.; Schuppler S.; Fragala J.; Theilacker N.; Franzreb M.; Wingren C.; Ellmark P.; Borrebaeck C. A. K.; Mirkin C. A.; Fuchs H.; Lenhert S. Multiplexed lipid dip-pen nanolithography on subcellular scales for the templating of functional proteins and cell culture. Small 2008, 4 (10), 1785–1793. 10.1002/smll.200800949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu M.; Holowka D.; Craighead H. G.; Baird B. Visualization of plasma membrane compartmentalization with patterned lipid bilayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101 (38), 13798–13803. 10.1073/pnas.0403835101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mossman K. D.; Campi G.; Groves J. T.; Dustin M. L. Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses. Science 2005, 310 (5751), 1191–1193. 10.1126/science.1119238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeMond A. L.; Mossman K. D.; Starr T.; Dustin M. L.; Groves J. T. T cell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. Biophys. J. 2008, 94 (8), 3286–3292. 10.1529/biophysj.107.119099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manz B. N.; Jackson B. L.; Petit R. S.; Dustin M. L.; Groves J. T-cell triggering thresholds are modulated by the number of antigen within individual T-cell receptor clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108 (22), 9089–9094. 10.1073/pnas.1018771108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stabley D.; Retterer S.; Marshall S.; Salaita K. Manipulating the lateral diffusion of surface-anchored EGF demonstrates that receptor clustering modulates phosphorylation levels. Integr. Biol. 2013, 5 (4), 659–668. 10.1039/c3ib20239a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim J.-H.; Ginger D. S.; Lee K.-B.; Heo J.; Nam J.-M.; Mirkin C. A. Direct-write dip-pen nanolithography of proteins on modified silicon oxide surfaces. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42 (20), 2309–2312. 10.1002/anie.200351256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cavalcanti-Adam E. A.; Micoulet A.; Blümmel J.; Auernheimer J.; Kessler H.; Spatz J. P. Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85 (3–4), 219–224. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfram T.; Belz F.; Schoen T.; Spatz J. P. Site-specific presentation of single recombinant proteins in defined nanoarrays. Biointerphases 2007, 2 (1), 44–48. 10.1116/1.2713991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falconnet D.; Pasqui D.; Park S.; Eckert R.; Schift H.; Gobrecht J.; Barbucci R.; Textor M. A Novel Approach to Produce Protein Nanopatterns by Combining Nanoimprint Lithography and Molecular Self-Assembly. Nano Lett. 2004, 4 (10), 1909–1914. 10.1021/nl0489438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pla-Roca M.; Fernandez J. G.; Mills C. A.; Martínez E.; Samitier J. Micro/nanopatterning of proteins via contact printing using high aspect ratio PMMA stamps and nanoimprint apparatus. Langmuir 2007, 23 (16), 8614–8618. 10.1021/la700572r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlapak R.; Danzberger J.; Haselgrübler T.; Hinterdorfer P.; Schäffler F.; Howorka S. Painting with biomolecules at the nanoscale. Nano Lett. 2012, 12 (4), 1983–1989. 10.1021/nl2045414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds N. P.; Tucker J. D.; Davison P. A.; Timney J. A.; Hunter C. N.; Leggett G. J. Site-specific immobilization and micrometer and nanometer scale photopatterning of yellow fluorescent protein on glass surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (3), 896–897. 10.1021/ja8079252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiesbauer M.; Wollhofen R.; Vasic B.; Schilcher K.; Jacak J.; Klar T. A. Nano-anchors with single protein capacity produced with STED lithography. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (11), 5672–5678. 10.1021/nl4033523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolfesberger C.; Wollhofen R.; Buchegger B.; Jacak J.; Klar T. A. Streptavidin functionalized polymer nanodots fabricated by visible light lithography. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 13 (1), 27. 10.1186/s12951-015-0084-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold M.; Schwieder M.; Blümmel J.; Cavalcanti-Adam E. A.; López-Garcia M.; Kessler H.; Geiger B.; Spatz J. P. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. Soft Matter 2009, 5 (1), 72–77. 10.1039/B815634D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pi F.; Dillard P.; Alameddine R.; Benard E.; Wahl A.; Ozerov I.; Charrier A.; Limozin L.; Sengupta K. Size-Tunable Organic Nanodot Arrays. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (8), 5178–5184. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzenbacher M.; Kaltenbrunner M.; Brameshuber M.; Hesch C.; Paster W.; Weghuber J.; Heise B.; Sonnleitner A.; Stockinger H.; Schütz G. J. Micropatterning for quantitative analysis of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 2008, 5 (12), 1053–1060. 10.1038/nmeth.1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sevcsik E.; Brameshuber M.; Fölser M.; Weghuber J.; Honigmann A.; Schütz G. J. GPI-anchored proteins do not reside in ordered domains in the live cell plasma membrane. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6969. 10.1038/ncomms7969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohmüller T.; Triffo S.; O’Donoghue G. P.; Xu Q.; Coyle M. P.; Groves J. T. Supported membranes embedded with fixed arrays of gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2011, 11 (11), 4912–4918. 10.1021/nl202847t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohmüller T.; Xu Q.; Groves J. T. Nanoscale obstacle arrays frustrate transport of EphA2-Ephrin-A1 clusters in cancer cell lines. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (7), 3059–3064. 10.1021/nl400874v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narui Y.; Salaita K. S. Dip-pen nanolithography of optically transparent cationic polymers to manipulate spatial organization of proteolipid membranes. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3 (3), 794–799. 10.1039/C1SC00475A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cai H.; Muller J.; Depoil D.; Mayya V.; Sheetz M. P.; Dustin M. L.; Wind S. J. Full control of ligand positioning reveals spatial thresholds for T cell receptor triggering. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 610. 10.1038/s41565-018-0113-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dulkeith E.; Morteani A. C.; Niedereichholz T.; Klar T. A.; Feldmann J.; Levi S. A.; van Veggel F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt D. N.; Möller M.; Gittins D. I. Fluorescence quenching of dye molecules near gold nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89 (20), 203002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.203002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deeg J.; Axmann M.; Matic J.; Liapis A.; Depoil D.; Afrose J.; Curado S.; Dustin M. L.; Spatz J. P. T cell activation is determined by the number of presented antigens. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (11), 5619–5626. 10.1021/nl403266t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maruo S.; Nakamura O.; Kawata S. Three-dimensional microfabrication with two-photon-absorbed photopolymerization. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22 (2), 132–134. 10.1364/OL.22.000132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawata S.; Sun H. B.; Tanaka T.; Takada K. Finer features for functional microdevices. Nature 2001, 412 (6848), 697–698. 10.1038/35089130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wollhofen R.; Axmann M.; Freudenthaler P.; Gabriel C.; Röhrl C.; Stangl H.; Klar T. A.; Jacak J. Multiphoton-Polymerized 3D Protein Assay. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (2), 1474–1479. 10.1021/acsami.7b13183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L.; Fourkas J. T. Multiphoton polymerization. Mater. Today 2007, 10 (6), 30–37. 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70130-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Farsari M.; Vamvakaki M.; Chichkov B. N. Multiphoton polymerization of hybrid materials. J. Opt. 2010, 12 (12), 124001. 10.1088/2040-8978/12/12/124001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cicha K.; Li Z.; Stadlmann K.; Ovsianikov A.; Markut-Kohl R.; Liska R.; Stampfl J. Evaluation of 3D structures fabricated with two-photon-photopolymerization by using FTIR spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110 (6), 064911. 10.1063/1.3639304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer J.; Wegener M. Three-dimensional direct laser writing inspired by stimulated-emission-depletion microscopy. Opt. Mater. Express 2011, 1 (4), 614–624. 10.1364/OME.1.000614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wollhofen R.; Buchegger B.; Eder C.; Jacak J.; Kreutzer J.; Klar T. A. Functional photoresists for sub-diffraction stimulated emission depletion lithography. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7 (7), 2538–2559. 10.1364/OME.7.002538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huppa J. B.; Axmann M.; Mörtelmaier M. A.; Lillemeier B. F.; Newell E. W.; Brameshuber M.; Klein L. O.; Schütz G. J.; Davis M. M. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010, 463 (7283), 963–967. 10.1038/nature08746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchegger B.; Kreutzer J.; Plochberger B.; Wollhofen R.; Sivun D.; Jacak J.; Schütz G. J.; Schubert U.; Klar T. A. Stimulated Emission Depletion Lithography with Mercapto-Functional Polymers. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 1954–1959. 10.1021/acsnano.5b05863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plochberger B.; Stockner T.; Chiantia S.; Brameshuber M.; Weghuber J.; Hermetter A.; Schwille P.; Schütz G. J. Cholesterol slows down the lateral mobility of an oxidized phospholipid in a supported lipid bilayer. Langmuir 2010, 26 (22), 17322–17329. 10.1021/la1026202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haensch C.; Hoeppener S.; Schubert U. S. Chemical modification of self-assembled silane based monolayers by surface reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39 (6), 2323–2334. 10.1039/b920491a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mostegel F. H.; Ducker R. E.; Rieger P. H.; El Zubir O.; Xia S.; Radl S. V.; Edler M.; Cartron M. L.; Hunter C. N.; Leggett G. J.; Griesser T. Versatile thiol-based reactions for micrometer- and nanometer-scale photopatterning of polymers and biomolecules. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3 (21), 4431–4438. 10.1039/C5TB00345H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chilkoti A.; Stayton P. S. Molecular Origins of the Slow Streptavidin-Biotin Dissociation Kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (43), 10622–10628. 10.1021/ja00148a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bayer E. A.; Ben-Hur H.; Wilchek M. A sensitive enzyme assay for biotin, avidin, and streptavidin. Anal. Biochem. 1986, 154 (1), 367–370. 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90538-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wollhofen R.; Katzmann J.; Hrelescu C.; Jacak J.; Klar T. A. 120 nm resolution and 55 nm structure size in STED-lithography. Opt. Express 2013, 21 (9), 10831–10840. 10.1364/OE.21.010831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.