Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;23(9):2123. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092123

Table 2.

Comparison of structural information obtained from thiolysis and 1H-13C HSQC NMR.

Plant Sample PC/PD Ratio cis/trans % Galloyl mDP
Thiol NMR Thiol NMR H/C-4 NMR H/C-2 Thiol NMR H/C-4 NMR H/C-2′,5′ Thiol NMR
Desmodium paniculatum 55/45 52.5/47.5 90/10 87.8/12.2 84.2/15.8 None None None 18.6 ND 1
Lespedeza stuevei 42/58 41.4/58.6 44/56 34.8/65.2 33.9/66.1 3 2.4 1.0 9.3 6.7
Lespedeza cuneata 8/92 4.3/95.7 80/20 82.1/17.9 75.4/24.6 None ND 2 5.3 10.6 9.1
Mimosa strigillosa 15/85 15.3/84.7 89/11 ND 3 ND 4 40 50.8 ND 5 7.6 6.1
Desmanthus illinoensis 3/97 1.8/98.2 98/2 ND 3 96.2/3.8 75 76.2 87.5 6.0 5.97
Neptunia lutea 12/88 8.2/91.8 93/7 ND 3 91.5/8.5 32 34.4 25.6 11.5 8.1
Leucaena retusa 99/1 98.6/1.4 98/2 ND 3 ND 4 29 21.3 34.3 39.2 6.3

ND, not determined. 1 Low signal to noise ratio on terminal C-H cross-peak signal. 2 Low signal to noise ratio for H/C-4 cross-peak signal. 3 Due to galloylation of the CT sample, cis/trans assignments become ambiguous using H/C-4 cross-peaks. 4 Low signal to noise ratio for the trans H/C-2 cross-peak signal. 5 Integration of peaks indicated > 100 mol % galloylation.