Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2018 Oct 22;7:e37677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37677

Morphogenetic degeneracies in the actomyosin cortex

Sundar Ram Naganathan 1,†,, Sebastian Fürthauer 2,9, Josana Rodriguez 3,4, Bruno Thomas Fievet 4, Frank Jülicher 2, Julie Ahringer 4, Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci 5,6, Stephan W Grill 1,5,
Editors: Naama Barkai8, Naama Barkai9
PMCID: PMC6226289  PMID: 30346273

Abstract

One of the great challenges in biology is to understand the mechanisms by which morphogenetic processes arise from molecular activities. We investigated this problem in the context of actomyosin-based cortical flow in C. elegans zygotes, where large-scale flows emerge from the collective action of actomyosin filaments and actin binding proteins (ABPs). Large-scale flow dynamics can be captured by active gel theory by considering force balances and conservation laws in the actomyosin cortex. However, which molecular activities contribute to flow dynamics and large-scale physical properties such as viscosity and active torque is largely unknown. By performing a candidate RNAi screen of ABPs and actomyosin regulators we demonstrate that perturbing distinct molecular processes can lead to similar flow phenotypes. This is indicative for a ‘morphogenetic degeneracy’ where multiple molecular processes contribute to the same large-scale physical property. We speculate that morphogenetic degeneracies contribute to the robustness of bulk biological matter in development.

Research organism: C. elegans

Introduction

Cell and tissue-scale morphogenetic processes are driven by well-orchestrated molecular activities and signalling pathways. Over the last three decades, mutational and RNAi-based genetic screens have provided a catalogue of proteins that are involved in various developmental processes (Perrimon et al., 2010; Mohr and Perrimon, 2012). But we are still a long way from understanding the mechanisms by which molecular-scale activities drive large-scale events such as actomyosin-driven flows, cell division and migration. To advance this problem, we reasoned that one way to connect molecular activities to large-scale functions is to assess phenotypic consequences of individual gene inhibitions at larger scales, and analyse these in the context of a physical theory. This would allow us to investigate which effective material properties are changed by which molecular perturbation, an important step forward that allows understanding of developmental processes across scales.

We pursued this approach in the context of actomyosin-based cortical flow during polarity establishment in C. elegans zygotes. Cortical flow is vital for cell polarization, migration (Bray and White, 1988; Callan-Jones et al., 2016; Ruprecht et al., 2015; Maiuri et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015) as well as for formation of contractile ring during cell division (Turlier et al., 2014; Reymann et al., 2016; Salbreux et al., 2009). In C. elegans, cortical flow is driven by a gradient in myosin activity (contractility) (Mayer et al., 2010), transporting the anterior polarity proteins, PAR-3, PAR-6 and aPKC to the appropriate region of the cortex to trigger polarization (Munro et al., 2004; Goehring et al., 2011). Cortical flow dynamics at large scales can be captured using a hydrodynamic theory by considering the actomyosin cortex as a thin film of an active chiral viscous fluid (Mayer et al., 2010; Behrndt et al., 2012; Turlier et al., 2014; Tjhung et al., 2015; Marchetti et al., 2013; Fürthauer et al., 2012; Fürthauer et al., 2013). Accordingly, large-scale on-axis (anterior directed) and chiral rotatory flows can be quantitatively described by considering active stresses and active torques (Mayer et al., 2010; Naganathan et al., 2014). In this approach, two effective bulk material properties are critical in describing large-scale flows: (1) a hydrodynamic length, which determines the distance over which flow generation ranges and which is vital for long-range advective transport of PAR proteins (Goehring et al., 2011; Mayer et al., 2010) and (2) a chirality index, which quantifies the relative amount by which the cortex is rotated compared to contraction, and which controls embryonic left-right symmetry breaking (Naganathan et al., 2014).

At the molecular scale, cortical flow is driven through actin cortex reorganization facilitated by actin binding proteins (ABPs) and actomyosin regulators as well as through force generation by myosin motor proteins. ABPs perform diverse functions such as sequestration of actin monomers and cross-linking, severing, capping and polymerization of actin filaments (Pollard and Cooper, 1986; dos Remedios et al., 2003; Winder and Proteins, 2005). RNAi and mutagenesis screens have given a glimpse of the phenotypes that emerge upon perturbation of ABP function in different processes (Luo et al., 2013; Wiggan et al., 2012; Shinomiya, 2012; Mendes Pinto et al., 2012; Böttcher et al., 2009; Girard et al., 2004). For example, loss of profilin (an ABP that promotes actin polymerization) expression enhances breast cancer cell motility (Bae et al., 2009) and loss of actinin (an ABP that crosslinks actin filaments) accelerates cleavage furrow constriction during cytokinesis (Mukhina et al., 2007). In the case of cortical flow, however, a comprehensive list of ABPs that regulate flow is not available. Furthermore, it is unknown which molecules regulate the bulk material properties that are critical in describing cortical flow.

Here, we performed a candidate based RNAi screen of 33 ABPs and included 11 actomyosin regulators that were revealed to have a significant impact on flow dynamics, as previously identified in an RNAi-based suppressor screen (Fievet et al., 2013). We quantified the impact of RNAi on each of these genes onto large-scale flow dynamics, and asked which molecular activities affect which material properties of the cortex. We identify several proteins to have a significant impact on cortical properties, and we demonstrate that RNAi of proteins with distinct molecular activities leads to similar changes in the quantifications performed. We categorize these proteins into functional groups and uncover degeneracy in the regulation of actomyosin-based cortical flow.

Attempts to link molecular activities of the actomyosin cytoskeleton to large-scale dynamics have been made before. For example, quantifying cellular geometry and using a physical model it was revealed that fish keratocyte shape is predominantly determined by actin network tread milling and membrane tension (Keren et al., 2008), but a systematic analysis to relate large-scale behaviours to molecular activities was not pursued in this work. In another study, an RNAi screen was performed in order to investigate cellular morphology and migration in Drosophila BG2-cells (Bakal et al., 2007). Here, a number of molecular players and signalling pathways were identified, but the connections to large-scale physical activities that determine cellular shape and migration were not characterized. Thus, mechanisms by which molecular activities integrate to determine large-scale physical functions have not yet been revealed. Perhaps the biggest step in this direction is provided by (Chugh et al., 2017), where an ABP screen was coupled with a computational model to reveal the principles of regulation of cortex thickness and cortical tension. Our work here provides a complementary approach, and we utilize a coarse-grained physical model to identify molecular activities that contribute to large-scale material properties and the emergent physical behaviours of the actomyosin cortex.

Results

Screening approach

We set out to perform a candidate RNAi screen to identify ABPs and actomyosin regulators that affect large-scale properties of cortical flow. We compiled a list of 33 ABPs that had diverse functionalities including nucleation, cross-linking, bundling, severing, capping and sequestering among others (Supplementary file 1, see Materials and methods). In addition to ABPs, we included 11 actomyosin regulators that were identified through a suppressor screen and confirmed to have a significant impact on actomyosin flow (Fievet et al., 2013). To try to obtain a strong loss of function, RNAi of these 44 candidates was performed by feeding L4-staged worms for 40 hrs. Where this resulted in sterile worms or meiotic arrest, we reduced the number of hours of feeding (see Materials and methods, Figure 1A, Supplementary file 1). RNAi of KLP-1 (a kinesin-like motor protein that is expressed only later in development [Zhou et al., 2001]) was used as a negative control for wild-type behaviour (Hall and Hedgecock, 1991; Schonegg et al., 2007). Under each RNAi condition, we quantified actin cortex structure and dynamics followed by a quantitative comparison to a hydrodynamic theory (see Figure 1B for list of quantifications) to determine the resultant large-scale material properties of the cortex. In what follows, we first present our different means of quantification of the various RNAi phenotypes and then identify functional groups among the genes knocked down.

Figure 1. Screen strategy.

Figure 1.

(A) Flow chart describes strategy undertaken to perform candidate RNAi screen of actin binding proteins and actomyosin regulators. Time-lapse images were then used to determine flow properties of the cortex. (B) Schematic of a 1-cell embryo indicating the quantities measured (numbers in red circle) and estimated (numbers in blue circle). Left - 1-cell embryo, where arrows indicate flow velocities and arrow lengths signify magnitude. A, anterior and P, posterior of the embryo; x-axis is along the long-axis of the embryo and the y-axis orthogonal to it. Red boxes within embryo indicate analysis regions in the posterior and anterior. Right - 1-cell embryo with myosin foci (green blobs).

A large fraction of actin binding and regulatory proteins affect cortical flow velocities

To analyse the impact of RNAi knockdown on bulk cortical flow, we measured the cortical flow velocity field by use of particle image velocimetry (PIV, Raffel et al., 2007) in embryos containing GFP-tagged non-muscle myosin II (NMY-2). We quantified both the anterior-directed, vx, and the rotational component, vy, of the cortical flow field (Naganathan et al., 2014). At each time point during flow, we performed a spatial average in the posterior of the embryo, following which a temporal average over the entire flow period was determined, to obtain an average vx¯. We also determined the difference between spatially averaged vy in the posterior and anterior region to specify an average chiral counter-rotation flow velocity vc¯. A distribution of vx¯ and vc¯ across all embryos for every RNAi condition was calculated, and the mean values of these distributions were compared to the respective negative controls. We found that 20 of 44 RNAi conditions resulted in a significant change (99% confidence, Wilcoxon rank sum test) in one or both of mean vx¯ and vc¯ compared to the negative control (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Figure 2—figure supplement 2 and see Videos 14 for representative examples). In agreement with previously published results that AP and chiral flow can be modulated independent of each other (Naganathan et al., 2014), we observed only a weak correlation between AP and chiral counter-rotation flow velocities (Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient, R, 0.04). We observed that on average a reduced anterior-directed or chiral flow could result from either slower flow velocities with the vx¯ or vc¯ distribution respectively closer to zero (Figure 2B,D middle, Video 3) or from fast flow velocities with a rapid change in direction signified by a broad distribution in flow velocities, for example in pfn-1 (RNAi) (Figure 2B,D right, Video 4). Given that large-scale RNAi screens performed in C. elegans 1-cell embryos have failed to identify many of these ABPs (Sönnichsen et al., 2005), we show that a rigorous quantification is required to identify subtle yet significant deviations from wild type cortical flow.

Figure 2. Quantification of cortical flow velocities.

(A), (C) Comparison of mean AP velocity vx¯ and mean chiral counter-rotation velocity vc¯ respectively. Shaded areas in the inset represent regions over which the spatial average was performed in each time frame. Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence (Wilcoxon rank sum test). (B), (D) Representative histograms of instantaneous vx¯ and vc¯ respectively. Gray histograms, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean vx¯ and vc¯ respectively. See Figure 2—figure supplement 1 and Figure 2—figure supplement 2 for histograms of significantly different ABPs and Figure 2—figure supplement 3 for a comparison of mean magnitude velocities. See Supplementary file for number of independent embryo samples in each RNAi condition.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Comparison of mean AP velocity, vx¯.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Each graph presents the instantaneous AP velocity vx¯ histogram for the RNAi condition specified. Only ABP knockdowns that are significantly different from the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi), are shown. Gray histogram, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean vx¯. The number of hours of RNAi is 40 hrs, unless otherwise stated.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Comparison of mean chiral counter-rotation velocity, vc¯.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Each graph presents the instantaneous chiral counter-rotation velocity vc¯ histogram for the RNAi condition specified. Only ABP knockdowns that are significantly different from the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi), are shown. Gray histogram, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean vc¯. The number of hours of RNAi is 40 hrs, unless otherwise stated.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Comparison of mean magnitude velocity, Mag¯.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence (Wilcoxon rank sum test).

Video 1. Phenotype - Fast AP flow: Comparison of cortical flow using TH455 transgenic line (NMY-2::GFP is visualized here) between the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) and arx-1 (RNAi) and unc-59 (RNAi), which led to significantly faster anterior-directed flow velocities.

Download video file (1.9MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.007

Movies were acquired with a 5 s frame interval and are being played 75x faster than real time. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Video 2. Phenotype - Fast chiral flow: Comparison of cortical flow using TH455 transgenic line (NMY-2::GFP is visualized here) between the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) and nex-1 (RNAi) and csnk-1 (RNAi), which led to significantly faster chiral flow velocities.

Download video file (1.7MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.008

Movies were acquired with a 5 s frame interval and are being played 75x faster than real time. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Video 3. Phenotype - Slow AP and chiral flow: Comparison of cortical flow using TH455 transgenic line (NMY-2::GFP is visualized here) between the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) and cap-1 (RNAi), unc-60 (RNAi) and ani-1 (RNAi), which led to significantly slower anterior-directed as well as chiral flow velocities.

Download video file (2.2MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.009

Movies were acquired with a 5 s frame interval and are being played 75x faster than real time. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Video 4. Phenotype - Short-range flow: Comparison of cortical flow using TH455 transgenic line (NMY-2::GFP is visualized here) between the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) and cyk-1 (RNAi), plst-1 (RNAi) and pfn-1 (RNAi), which led to short-range flow.

Download video file (2.3MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.010

Movies were acquired with a 5 s frame interval and are being played 75x faster than real time. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Pulsatility in cortical flow is affected by actin binding and regulatory proteins

In all conditions, we noted that the flow had a pulsatile characteristic (as described in Nishikawa et al., 2017) with a periodic temporal increase and decrease in flow velocity (Video 5). Pulsatility, emerging through self-organization of the actomyosin network, is an intrinsic feature of active contractile systems and plays an instrumental role in numerous morphogenetic processes (Gorfinkiel, 2016; Munjal et al., 2015; Nishikawa et al., 2017). Identification of molecular components that regulate pulsatility is therefore an important step forward in investigating self-organization of actomyosin networks. We refer to the period of the flow velocity oscillation as Tosc. To calculate Tosc, we quantified the temporal change in vx¯ in the posterior of the embryo and performed an autocorrelation of the temporal velocity profile (see Materials and methods for further information). We determined Tosc to be 33.3 ± 4 s (mean ± error of mean at 95 % confidence) for the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition. We found that 10 RNAi conditions resulted in a significant change in Tosc compared to the negative control (Figure 3). Importantly, ABPs that regulate actin filament turnover such as F-actin polymerizing proteins (pfn-1, cyk-1, arx-2) and F-actin severing (unc-60, fli-1) and capping (cap-1) proteins have a significant effect on the period of pulsation suggesting that pulsation is regulated by cortex turnover.

Figure 3. Quantification of pulsatile period of cortical flow.

Figure 3.

(A) Comparison of mean period of pulsatile AP velocity, Tosc, in the posterior of the embryo. Shaded area in the inset represents the region over which the spatial average of velocity was performed in each time frame. The formula for the autocorrelation function is indicated, where T is total analysis time of cortical flow and k is increment (see Materials and methods). Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 95% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 95% confidence (Wilcoxon rank sum test). (B) Normalized autocorrelation decay curves from individual embryos (thin black lines) for the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi), cyk-1 (RNAi) and unc-60 (RNAi). Circular markers represent mean of the periods determined from individual embryos, with error bars representing SEM. See Supplementary file for number of independent embryo samples in each RNAi condition.

Video 5. Pulsatile flow: Cortical flow exhibits pulsatile characteristics in the posterior cortex.

Download video file (286.7KB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.012

Cortical flow acquired using TH455 transgenic line (NMY-2::GFP is visualized here for the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi)) with a 5 s frame interval. Movie is being played 25x faster than real time. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Flow velocities and actomyosin foci structure are correlated

Since network architecture is known to facilitate actomyosin dynamics (Lieleg et al., 2010; Reymann et al., 2012; Blanchoin et al., 2014), we next asked whether a change in flow velocity is associated with an alteration of large-scale actomyosin foci structure (Munro et al., 2004; Munjal et al., 2015). It was shown previously that a change in actin filament organization highly correlates with a change in myosin organization during cortical flow (Reymann et al., 2016). We therefore used non-muscle myosin II as a proxy for cortical structure analysis and quantified myosin foci size, S and foci number density, ρ, under each RNAi condition. We defined foci size as the position of the first local minimum in the myosin fluorescence intensity autocorrelation function, measured in the anterior region of the embryo (see Materials and methods and Figure 4A). To determine foci number density ρ, we developed a custom algorithm that identifies foci by analysing variation in myosin fluorescence intensity in the vicinity of identified local fluorescence extrema (see Materials and methods and Figure 5A). From these quantifications, we found that 17 of 44 RNAi conditions resulted in a significant change in one or both of myosin foci size (Figure 4B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1) and foci number density (Figure 5B, Figure 5—figure supplement 1) when compared to the negative control (klp-1 (RNAi)). Interestingly, we observed that S was negatively correlated with ρ (R, −0.84, Figure 7—figure supplement 2E), where an increase in foci size corresponded to a decrease in foci number density and vice versa. It remains to be investigated whether there exists a limiting component that leads to this inverse correlation. A comparison of flow velocity with foci size/density revealed that 12 of 17 conditions that affected foci size and/or density also resulted in a significant change in flow velocities. Moreover, vx¯ was negatively correlated with S (R, −0.62, Figure 7—figure supplement 2B) and positively correlated with ρ (R, 0.58, Figure 7—figure supplement 2C). In other words, bigger foci size (and smaller foci density) is correlated with slower average flow velocities. We conclude that RNAi conditions that affect actomyosin flow velocities tend to also affect myosin foci size and/or density. Importantly, this suggests that actomyosin network structure is strongly linked to the observed dynamics.

Figure 4. Quantification of myosin foci size.

(A) Representative 2D myosin fluorescence intensity autocorrelation function as a heat map (middle) for the anterior region (left) of a single frame during cortical flow from a klp-1 (RNAi) embryo. Scale bar, 5 µm. Right - radial average of the autocorrelation function. (B) Comparison of mean foci size, S. Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence (Wilcoxon rank sum test). Shaded area in the inset represents the region in which the fluorescence intensity autocorrelation was performed in each frame. (C) Representative histograms of S determined over time during the cortical flow period. Gray histograms, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean foci size. See Figure 4—figure supplement 1 for histograms of significantly different ABPs. See Supplementary file for number of independent embryo samples in each RNAi condition.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Comparison of mean foci size, S.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Each graph presents the foci size histogram for the RNAi condition specified. Only ABP knockdowns that are significantly different from the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi), are shown. Gray histogram, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean S. The number of hours of RNAi is 40 hrs, unless otherwise stated.

Figure 5. Quantification of myosin foci number density.

(A) Detection of myosin foci (right) by analysis of local changes in fluorescence intensity in the vicinity of identified local extrema (middle) for the anterior region (left) of a single frame during cortical flow from a klp-1 (RNAi) embryo. Scale bar, 5 µm. (B) Comparison of mean foci number density, ρ. Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence (Wilcoxon rank sum test). Shaded area in the inset represents the region that was utilized for foci detection in each frame. (C) Representative histograms of ρ determined over time during the cortical flow period. Gray histograms, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean foci number density. See Figure 5—figure supplement 1 for histograms of significantly different ABPs. See Supplementary file for number of independent embryo samples in each RNAi condition.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Comparison of mean foci number density, ρ.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Each graph presents the foci number density histogram for the RNAi condition specified. Only ABP knockdowns that are significantly different from the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi), are shown. Gray histogram, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed lines, mean ρ. The number of hours of RNAi is 40 hrs, unless otherwise stated.

Estimation of large-scale material properties of the cortex

We next sought to identify proteins that affect relevant large-scale material properties of the actomyosin cortical layer. Previous studies have shown that the AP flow velocity (vx) and the y-velocity (vy) obey the equations of motion,

xT=ηx2vxγvx (1)
xτ=12ηx2vyγvy (2)

These equations capture many aspects of cortical flow at larger scales through two effective material properties: first, the hydrodynamic length λ=η/γ, which depends on cortex viscosity η and γ that quantifies the friction with the membrane and/or cytoplasm, and second, the chirality index c=τ/T, where τ is the active torque density and T is the active tension of the actomyosin cortex (Fürthauer et al., 2012; Fürthauer et al., 2013; Mayer et al., 2010; Naganathan et al., 2014). To calculate the material properties, we first determined average myosin distribution along the AP axis (Figure 6B, blue markers) during cortical flow, which we then equated to active tension and active torque density. Using Equations 1 and 2, we then calculated theoretical AP and chiral flow profiles (Figure 6B, Figure 6—figure supplement 1, magenta and beige curves respectively) that best matched with experimental flow profiles (Figure 6B, Figure 6—figure supplement 1, magenta and beige markers respectively). The best fit parameters then yielded the hydrodynamic length and the chirality index. We observed that RNAi of several of the ABPs and actomyosin regulators resulted in a significant change of both the hydrodynamic length and the chirality index as compared to the non-RNAi embryos (Figure 6A,C). Thus, material properties of the cortex can be tuned in different ways, by modulating a diverse set of molecular activities. Interestingly, while a large fraction of RNAi knockdowns resulted in a significantly reduced chirality index, three of four knockdown conditions (rga-3 - also shown in (Naganathan et al., 2014), csnk-1, cpn-1) that resulted in a significantly higher chirality index are known to also impact on myosin activity. This further strengthens the idea that active processes in the actomyosin cytoskeleton generate active torques for chiral symmetry breaking. Notably, 15 of 20 conditions that affected flow velocities and 14 of 17 conditions that affected foci structure resulted in a significant change in the hydrodynamic length. Similarly, 15 of 20 RNAi conditions that affected flow velocities and 13 of 17 conditions that affected foci structure resulted in a significant change in the chirality index. Thus, we conclude that RNAi conditions that affect actomyosin flow velocities, myosin foci size, or myosin foci density tend to also modify the hydrodynamic length and/or the chirality index.

Figure 6. Estimation of physical properties of the cortex.

(A), (C) Comparison of the hydrodynamic length, λ and chirality index, c of the cortex respectively. Error bars, SEM; gray bar, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi) condition; gray horizontal bar, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi); cyan, beige bars, significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence (significance determined using normal cumulative distribution function in MATLAB). The bins over which spatial average of velocities were determined in each frame are shown in the inset. (B) Average myosin intensity (blue markers) and velocity profiles (magenta markers, AP flow velocity vx; beige markers, y-velocity vy) along the AP axis for representative RNAi conditions. Error bars, SEM. Magenta and beige curves, respective theoretical velocity profiles. Dashed lines, theoretical velocity profiles for klp-1 (RNAi) condition. See Figure 6—figure supplement 1 for more examples of fit profiles of significantly different ABPs. See Supplementary file for number of independent embryo samples in each RNAi condition.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Comparison of hydrodynamic model fit to experimental flow profiles.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

Row 1 (row 2) represents the top three ABP knockdowns that resulted in a significantly higher (lower) λ, and row 3 (row 4) represents the top three ABP knockdowns that resulted in a significantly higher (lower) c. Each graph presents the average myosin intensity (blue markers) and velocity profiles (magenta markers, AP flow velocity vx; beige markers, y-velocity vy) along the AP axis for each RNAi condition specified. Error bars, SEM. Magenta and beige curves, respective theoretical velocity profiles. Dashed lines, theoretical velocity profiles of the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi).

Dimensional reduction analysis reveals clusters with similar effects on cortical mechanics

RNAi of ABPs and actomyosin regulators resulted in a spectrum of changes in flow velocities, foci structure and material properties of the cortex. Based on the quantifications performed, we next asked whether there exists groups of proteins that have a similar impact on large-scale actomyosin behaviours. To answer this question we used a nonlinear dimensional reduction algorithm to perform a mapping of the dataset to a lower-dimensional space. We then identified clusters of conditions with similar behaviours by manual inspection. We used five parameters for the analysis – foci number density, AP velocity, oscillatory period, hydrodynamic length and chirality index. We computed pairwise distances between the different RNAi conditions using the minimum curvilinear embedding (MCE) approach (Cannistraci et al., 2010; Cannistraci et al., 2013Muscoloni et al., 2017) (see Materials and methods for more information). Dimensional reduction of this data set (Figure 7A) revealed four different groups of proteins with similar effects on cortical mechanics. Cluster zero corresponds to the wild type (Wt, Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Manual inspection of the pattern by which genes affected the different parameters (heat map in Figure 7B), motivated us to split cluster three into three sub-groups of proteins (clusters 3a-3c). Interestingly, each cluster comprised proteins with different functions suggesting that large-scale actomyosin behaviours can be attained by tuning diverse molecular mechanisms.

Figure 7. Distinct molecular functions possess similar roles at large-scales.

(A) Non-linear dimensional reduction of the quantitative data set was performed and plotted along dimensions that represent the highest variability. Circular markers, ABPs; star markers, actomyosin regulators; colours represent the different clusters and black represents knockdowns in the same group as the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi); Wt - wild type. See Figure 7—figure supplement 1 for a heat map of the wild type cluster and Figure 7—figure supplement 4 for a correlation of quantifications and the two principal axes of the dimensionally reduced data set. (B) Parameters that were used for dimensional reduction (foci density ρ, AP velocity vx¯, chirality index c, flow period Tosc, hydrodynamic length λ) were rearranged and displayed as heat maps for knockdowns that constitute each cluster. Colour bar, z-score. See Figure 7—figure supplement 2 for correlations between different quantifications and Figure 7—figure supplement 3 for visualisation of cytoplasmic actin fluorescence for unc-60 and cap-1 (RNAi) from cluster 3c.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Heat map of proteins part of the wild type cluster.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

Parameters that were used for dimensional reduction (foci density ρ, AP velocity vx¯, chirality index c, flow period Tosc, hydrodynamic length λ) are displayed as heat maps for knockdowns that constitute the wild type cluster. Colour bar, z-score; klp-1 (RNAi) - negative control.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2. Correlation between quantifications for ABPs.

Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

(A) Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients between pairs of quantifications are shown as a heat map. (B)-(E) Selected pairs of quantifications that were positively or negatively correlated are shown as scatter plots. Circular markers, individual knockdowns; error bars, SEM; green marker, negative control, klp-1 (RNAi); gray bars, error of the mean with 99% confidence for klp-1 (RNAi) condition; dashed line, least squares fit of the data.
Figure 7—figure supplement 3. Cytoplasmic actin fluorescence.

Figure 7—figure supplement 3.

SWG007 transgenic line was used to image cytoplasmic actin. A snapshot of the indicated knockdown was performed 2 µm deeper from the cortical region at the start of cortical flows and displayed. An increase in cytoplasmic actin fluorescence was observed in unc-60 and cap-1 (RNAi) conditions compared to the negative control, klp-1 (RNAi). Images are displayed in the same gray-scale dynamic range. Scale bar, 10 µm.
Figure 7—figure supplement 4. Correlation between quantifications and clustering dimensions.

Figure 7—figure supplement 4.

Correlation between the five quantifications (foci density ρ, AP velocity vx¯, chirality index c, flow period Tosc, hydrodynamic length λ) used for clustering and the two principal axes (D1, D2) in the dimensionally reduced data set are shown as a heat map. The Pearson’s linear correlation co-efficient is indicated in each heat map square.

We next briefly discuss each of the three clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of two actomyosin regulators, the Rho-1 regulator RGA-3 and casein-kinase 1 (CSNK-1) and two ABPs, an actin-membrane cross linker (annexin, NEX-1) and an inhibitor of myosin ATPase activity (calponin, CPN-1) (red, Figure 7). A characteristic feature of this cluster was an increase in the average chirality index suggesting that these proteins regulate chiral properties of the actomyosin cortex.

Cluster 2 consisted of an actomyosin regulator (NTL-2, a CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit) and ABPs that scaffold the cortex (SPC-1, spectrin) and create branched actin networks (ARX-2, a component of the ARP 2/3 complex) (green, Figure 7). RNAi of cluster two proteins resulted in an increase in average foci density and a decrease in the period of oscillation, that is faster oscillations. RNAi conditions that resulted in faster oscillations were also found in cluster 3b (see below). Together, these knockdowns enable investigation of mechanisms that lead to emergence of pulsation.

The third cluster consisted of a diverse array of proteins. We split this cluster into three sub-groups which displayed similar behaviours in terms of the quantifications performed. Cluster 3a consisted of 6 actomyosin regulators (orange, Figure 7) displaying an increase in the hydrodynamic length and a decrease in the chirality index of the cortex. Cluster 3b (pink, Figure 7) consisted of one actomyosin regulator (CDC-42, a Rho-GTPase) and 4 ABPs that promote polymerization (profilin, PFN-1; formin, CYK-1), crosslinking (anillin, ANI-1) and bundling of actin filaments (Ding et al., 2017) (plastin, PLST-1). RNAi of cluster 3b proteins resulted in a decrease in average foci number density, AP velocity, oscillatory flow period and chirality index of the cortex. A lower foci density indicates a less dense actomyosin cortex, hinting at a reduction in effective viscosity of the cortex. Consistent with this possibility, we observed a decrease in the hydrodynamic length of the cortex for RNAi of cluster 3b proteins (Figure 7B). Finally, cluster 3c consisted of a myosin chaperone (UNC-45) and two ABPs that cap barbed ends (capping protein, CAP-1) and sever actin filaments (cofilin, UNC-60) (cluster 3c, violet, Figure 7). RNAi of cluster 3c proteins resulted in a decrease in average AP velocity, chirality index and an increase in the average period of oscillation (in cap-1 and unc-60 (RNAi) conditions) that is slower oscillations. Furthermore, we observed an increase in foci number density (UNC-60) or foci size (CAP-1), and cluster 3c RNAi conditions (UNC-60 and CAP-1) tend to display a reduced hydrodynamic length. To rationalize the latter observation, we imaged cytoplasmic actin using a Life act::mKate transgenic line, and observed an increase in cytoplasmic F-actin density under RNAi of the cluster 3c genes cap-1 and unc-60 (Figure 7—figure supplement 3). Increasing F-actin density throughout the cytosol is likely to increase cytoplasmic viscosity, which in turn would lead to an increased effective friction and a reduced hydrodynamic length.

Taken together, we identify clusters of ABPs that regulate large-scale material properties of the cortex. A central result from our study is that distinct ABP molecular activities can have a similar impact on large-scale actomyosin cortical behaviours.

Discussion

Here, we present a systematic approach to connect molecular functions to emergent large-scale physical properties of the actomyosin cortex. We combined RNAi screening with phenotypic characterization in terms of hydrodynamic theory. Our RNAi-based knockdown conditions do not correspond to a full loss of function, and our approach allows for a quantitative characterization of subtle cortical phenotypes. This has enabled us to identity a number of ABPs that were not previously described to have a significant impact on cortical structure and dynamics. We also identified cortex bulk physical properties (hydrodynamic length, chirality index) that are under control of ABPs and actomyosin regulators. Notably, the large-scale physical properties of the cortex are important for embryonic development wherein, a sufficiently long hydrodynamic length facilitates establishment of head-tail (AP) body axis (Mayer et al., 2010) and chiral active torques in the cortex help determine the L/R body axis (Pohl and Bao, 2010; Schonegg et al., 2014; Singh and Pohl, 2014; Naganathan et al., 2014; Naganathan et al., 2016). Since these material properties are impacted by several gene knockdowns, we suggest that the observed hydrodynamic length and chirality index (18 µm and 0.321 respectively for klp-1 (RNAi)) emerges from numerous molecular interactions and are a ‘summed effect’ of many different protein activities. Hence, RNAi perturbation of individual molecular activities results in subtle yet quantifiable deviation from the characteristic wild type behaviour.

Chirality is an emergent active property of the actomyosin cytoskeleton that is dependent on molecular-scale torque generation (Naganathan et al., 2014). Here, we identify actin binding proteins to play a significant role in regulating chirality suggesting that cortical actin network architecture is equally important. This resonates well with a recent discovery, where in addition to myosin activity, the actin network architecture was shown to play a vital role in regulating cortex thickness and tension (Chugh et al., 2017). Finally, actomyosin pulsation is another property of the actomyosin cortex that is involved in a number of morphogenetic processes (Gorfinkiel, 2016). While self-organization of actomyosin cortex (Munjal et al., 2015; Nishikawa et al., 2017) and pulsation of Rho-associated proteins (Nishikawa et al., 2017) were suggested to be important for actomyosin pulsation, here we identify ABPs that facilitate the emergence of pulsation. Generally, we observe that a reduction in cortical viscosity is correlated with faster oscillations (cluster 3b proteins). Furthermore, spectrin (cluster 2) knockdown led to faster oscillations and given that spectrin is vital for maintenance of membrane shape (Zhang et al., 2013), it will be interesting to investigate the effect of membrane stability on actomyosin oscillations.

Interestingly, our MCE analysis indicates that distinct molecular activities can give rise to similar functional phenotypes at large-scales. We suggest that this is likely because the same material property or the same physical behaviour is being impacted by distinct sets of proteins from a single group. For example, polymerizing, crosslinking and bundling activities of ABPs are known to modulate viscoelastic responses of actin networks (Stricker et al., 2010). Here, we show that knockdown of any of these molecular activities leads to similar large-scale phenotypes (cluster 3b in Figure 7) and results in a decreased hydrodynamic length. This signifies a reduced cortical viscosity in all these conditions and thus likely leading to similar flow phenotypes. Similarly, reducing the severing activity or capping of actin filaments leads to similar phenotypes (cluster 3c in Figure 7) that signified an increase in friction of the cortex with the cytoplasm. Our results suggest that critical physical parameters that determine large-scale functions can be tuned by modulating a spectrum of molecular functions. In other words, there exists several ways in which a bulk physical property can be achieved. Our results are indicative of a ‘morphogenetic degeneracy’, where distinct activities at the molecular scale contribute to similar physical activities at larger scales.

Any screening approach where a small set of cellular functions and activities are probed with a large number of molecular perturbations will give rise to degeneracy. This is because there will be cases where similar outcomes in terms of changes to the cellular functions assayed will be achieved with distinct molecular perturbations, and this is most obvious for cases where there is a redundancy in molecular function. We are here suggesting that there is a mechanism at work in living systems that is distinct from this ‘trivial degeneracy’. Our line of argumentation is that there is an intermediate layer at the mesoscale that is important to consider. Phenotypes at larger scales are determined by unusual material properties of living matter at this mesoscale, together with force and torque generation. Now, material properties at the mesoscale arise through coarse-graining and averaging microscopic degrees of freedom, and only a small set of mesoscopic physical parameters contribute to the force balance and the dynamics of the system at the mesoscale. This again gives rise to a degeneracy, but this ‘morphogenetic degeneracy’ at the mesoscale is of physical nature and can arise in the absence of redundancy of molecular activity. Since coarse-graining implies a reduction of the degrees of freedom of a system, similar large scale behaviours can emerge from distinct molecular processes that need not necessarily be redundant with each other.

To conclude, it is important to connect molecular functions to phenotypes at larger scales, and the approach we have pursued here exemplifies an experimental strategy that allows to map out this physical degeneracy between molecular activities and mesoscale physical properties that determine phenotypes. We speculate that the degeneracy we observe in the functioning of ABPs contributes to the robust performance of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. Finally, while degeneracy and its link to robustness has been widely studied with respect to gene regulatory networks (Whitacre, 2010; Whitacre and Bender, 2010; Edelman and Gally, 2001), we here suggest a novel physical implication of degeneracy in living systems that contributes to the robustness of biological matter.

Materials and methods

C.elegans strains

In this study, TH455 transgenic line (unc-119(ed3) III; zuIs45[nmy-2::NMY-2::GFP + unc-119(+)] V; ddIs249[TH0566(pie1::Lifeact::mCherry:pie1)]) was used for imaging cortical flow and SWG007 transgenic line nmy-2(cp8[NMY-2::GFP + unc-119(+)]) I; unc-119(ed3) III; gesIs001[unc-119(ed3) III; (mex-5::Life act::mKate2::nmy2u + unc-119(+))] for imaging cytoplasmic actin. C. elegans worms were cultured on OP50-seeeded NGM agar plates as described (Brenner, 1974).

RNA interference

We first compiled a list of 95 ABPs by assessing putative functions (see Supplementary file 1) and known expression patterns. We removed from our experiments ABPs that act as enzymes, and because our analysis was restricted to 1-cell embryos, proteins that have muscle-specific or cell-cell adhesion-specific functions were also removed. The final list comprised 33 ABPs, which were subjected to RNAi-based knockdown to investigate their roles in actomyosin-based cortical flows. RNAi experiments were performed by feeding (Timmons et al., 2001). Early L4-staged worms were placed on feeding plates (NGM agar containing 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside and 50 µgml-1 ampicillin) and incubated for 40 hrs at 25C. We defined feeding time (number of hours of RNAi) as the time between transfer of worms to the feeding plate and putative fertilization of the egg. Worms were dissected in M9 buffer and the embryos were mounted on 2% agarose pads for image acquisition. The number of hours of feeding was reduced by 10 hrs if 40 hr feeding resulted in sterile worms or produced embryos that arrested at meiosis. The feeding time had to be reduced for cap-1 (30 hrs), cyk-1 (30 hrs), pfn-1 (20 hrs) and unc-60 (15 hrs) RNAi conditions.

Feeding clones for cdc-42, plst-1, erm-1, unc-45, unc-59 and the actomyosin regulators were obtained from the Ahringer lab (Gurdon institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and for pfn-1 and unc-60 from the Hyman lab (MPI-CBG, Dresden, Germany). The rest of the feeding clones were obtained from Source Bioscience (Nottingham, United Kingdom).

Image acquisition

Cortical flow movies using the TH455 transgenic line were acquired at 2324C with a spinning disc confocal microscope using a Zeiss C-Apochromat 63X/1.2 NA objective lens, a Yokogawa CSU-X1 scan head, a 525/50 nm bandpass emission filter from Semrock and an Andor iXon EMCCD camera (512 by 512 pixels). A stack consisting of three z-planes (0.5 µm apart) with a 488 nm laser (30% AOTF intensity) and an exposure of 150 ms was acquired at an interval of 5 s from the onset of cortical flow until the first cell division. The maximum intensity projection of the stack at each time point was then subjected for further analysis.

Flow velocity analysis

Flow velocity analysis was performed from the start of flow until pseudo-cleavage. We refer to this analysis period as the ‘entire flow period’. 2D cortical flow velocity fields were obtained by performing Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) (Raffel et al., 2007) using the freely available PIVlab MATLAB algorithm (pivlab.blogspot.de). PIVlab was employed by performing a 3-step multi pass (with linear window deformation) where the final interrogation area was 16 pixels with a step of 8 pixels.

2D velocity fields were projected to the AP axis by dividing the embryo into 18 bins along the AP axis (see Figure 6A inset and Figure 1B in Naganathan et al., 2014), and by spatially averaging the x-component or the y-component of velocity along each bin in a single frame. Average AP velocity vx¯ was quantified in each frame by spatially averaging the x-component of velocity in the posterior across bins 13 to 16. The posterior domain was considered for velocity analysis because of high flow velocities (see Figure 6B). In the anterior domain, because the flow velocities are relatively lower (see Figure 6B), it is harder to distinguish changes in flow velocities across RNAi conditions. Average chiral counter rotation velocity vc¯ was quantified in each frame by subtracting the y-component of velocity in the anterior (spatially averaged across bins 3 to 6) from the y-component of velocity in the posterior (spatially averaged across bins 13 to 16). Histograms of vx¯ and vc¯ were plotted by computing these quantities in each frame across the entire flow period in all embryos of one experimental condition and mean velocities were compared between conditions. Significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test in MATLAB.

To obtain the flow profiles, 2D velocity fields were projected to the AP axis and averaged over time across the entire flow period (from start of flow till pseudo cleavage). These time-averaged flow profiles were then averaged across all embryos for one experimental condition. Bin extent in the y direction was restricted to a stripe of about 13 µm.

Oscillation analysis

A box of size 6 µm by 6 µm was defined in the posterior with the box centre in between bins 14 and 15. Average AP velocity quantified in this box was used for determination of oscillation period. This analysis was performed in individual embryos. The temporal change in average AP velocity was determined in the box and autocorrelation of the resulting temporal profile was determined using a custom-written function. Before performing autocorrelation, the mean AP velocity in the box across the entire flow period was determined and subtracted from the data. Autocorrelation was performed by shifting incrementally the mean subtracted data until half the total analysis time. The first peak in the autocorrelation profile, which corresponds to the flow oscillation period, was determined using the ‘lmax’ function downloaded from Mathworks. Very few movies across conditions resulted in no peak in the autocorrelation profile, which were discarded. In the case of negative control, the first peak could be identified in all movies. A mean oscillation flow period was determined across embryos for a single experimental condition and compared. Significantly different knockdowns with 95% confidence were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test in MATLAB.

Foci structure analysis

A characteristic myosin foci size was determined by performing spatial myosin fluorescence intensity autocorrelation in MATLAB. The autocorrelation was performed in a stripe of about 27 µm wide (centred in between bins 7 and 8) and 13 µm high in the anterior of the embryo (see Figure 4B inset). The anterior domain was considered for foci structure analysis given the higher overall signal of myosin (see Figure 6B). In the posterior, flow depletes myosin in addition to turnover, thus interfering with the foci structure analysis. A radial average of the resulting autocorrelation was performed using the ‘rscan’ algorithm downloaded from Mathworks. In this function, the coordinates of a circle with a specific radius around an origin are determined, following which the average values of points where the circle passes through are computed. The radius of the circle is incremented and a radially averaged profile is obtained. The position of the first local minimum in the autocorrelation profile, defined as the characteristic foci size, was then determined using the ‘lmin’ function downloaded from Mathworks.

Foci number density was determined in the same analysis stripe by a thresholding method. An interrogation area of about 2 µm by 2 µm was chosen and shifted pixel by pixel through the entire stripe. All local maxima in fluorescence intensities were first identified. The identified maxima were then taken through a number of steps to determine foci number density. Firstly, if the identified maxima were closer than 1 µm, they were merged into a single maximum. Secondly, foci that were significantly dimmer than the rest were identified and discarded. This was performed by first determining the mean fluorescence intensity of each interrogation area centred around the identified maxima. A threshold fluorescence intensity was defined by calculating the average intensity ± 0.5*STD across all interrogation areas of interest. Any interrogation area with a mean intensity lesser than the threshold was considered to be dimmer than the rest and therefore discarded. Finally, foci that comprised many local maxima were identified and merged into a single focus. This was performed by determining the fluorescence intensities in the region between identified maxima. The maxima were merged into a single focus, if no continuous decrease in intensity between the maxima for more than a micron was observed. The total number of foci thus identified was divided by the area of the stripe to obtain the number density.

Histograms of characteristic foci sizes and number densities were plotted by computing these quantities in each frame during the first 75 s of cortical flow in all embryos of one experimental condition and mean values were compared between conditions. Significantly different knockdowns with 99% confidence were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test in MATLAB.

Hydrodynamic model and fitting phenomenological coefficients

The theory for cortical flows that we use to extract the hydrodynamic length and the chirality index is the result of a rigorous derivation from a generic phenomenological theory for active chiral fluids (Fürthauer et al., 2013). The steps of the derivation are laid out in the Appendix of (Naganathan et al., 2014). The resulting theory is compressible in two dimensions but is built on top of a three-dimensional incompressible fluid theory. The important assumptions in the derivation of the theory are: (i) the cortex is viscous on the time scales of cortical flows and thus has no elastic term. This is in fact a consequence of cortical turnover and one might guess that a cortex without turnover might behave more like an elastic gel. Assuming a viscous cortex therefore indirectly takes into account actin and myosin turnover. (ii) A specific relation between the bulk viscosity and shear viscosity of the 3D actomyosin gel was assumed: they are set equal. This is done for simplicity. (iii) The friction term can be considered linear and local. This model cannot describe the observed oscillatory behaviour in the actomyosin cortex. Actomyosin oscillations are driven by independent oscillations in the Rho signalling pathway that regulates myosin activity (Nishikawa et al., 2017) and an independent model is therefore required to describe oscillatory flows.

To compare our theory to experiment, we numerically solved hydrodynamic equations of a thin film of an active chiral fluid (Naganathan et al., 2014) using a finite difference scheme, using the two extreme points of the measured velocity profile as boundary conditions. These equations depend on three free parameters, the hydrodynamic length l, and the constants α and β which relate the measured fluorescence intensity I to the active tension and the active torque density such that T=αI and τ=βI, respectively. Myosin is the main driver of cortical flow. This has been extensively validated for anterior-directed flows in (Mayer et al., 2010) and for chiral flows in (Naganathan et al., 2014). These papers show that active stresses are growing functions µ(C) of myosin concentration c. The exact functional form is unknown and might very well depend on the structure of the underlying actomyosin cortex. Here, we report the first order co-efficient (linear response co-efficient) of a Taylor expansion of µ(C) and its chiral counterpart. Note that our theory makes no predictions on how the structure of the cortex affects flows.

We adjusted these three parameters by performing a least squares fit of the solutions of these equations to the measured velocity profile. In this way, we obtained values for the hydrodynamic length l and the chirality index c=τ/T numerically. We obtained error estimates for l, α and β from the Hessian of the residual of the least square fit with respect to the parameters.

The pfn-1 (RNAi) phenotype was characterized by extreme and fast motion on timescales that are short (15 s) compared to our averaging window and importantly approach the cortical turnover time (30 s), see Figure 3. The hydrodynamic model, which we developed is strictly valid in a regime where the cortex is viscous, that is for flows which are slow compared to the cortical turnover time. pfn-1 (RNAi) might push the cortex into a regime where this assumption breaks down. Indeed, movies of pfn-1 (RNAi) showed events that might be interpreted as local ruptures of the cortex, which is an elastic effect. Since our theory does not include elastic effects, it failed to capture a phenotype dominated by elastic effects. A second effect that comes into play due to the more violent flows is that local compression can lead to local alignment of actin filaments in the cortex. This changes the symmetries of the problem and may give rise to effects that are not captured in our model, which assumes that the actin network is isotropic in the cortical plane. Active fluid theory without chirality was therefore used to fit velocity profiles of pfn-1 (RNAi) as the fit quality was poor when chirality was included. Therefore, we could determine the hydrodynamic length but not the chirality index for pfn-1 (RNAi).

Nonlinear dimensional reduction

Quantifications from both the ABP and suppressor screen data set (11 actomyosin regulators) were first combined and the zscore (from MATLAB) was computed for each RNAi condition across each quantification. Since chirality index for pfn-1 (RNAi) could not be determined from a fit of velocity profiles and given that chiral counter-rotation velocity for pfn-1 (RNAi) was nearly zero (see Figure 2C), a chirality index of zero was used for pfn-1 (RNAi) before computing the z-scores. This was then followed by determination of curvilinear distances (also called nonlinear sample distances) between data points by calculation of pair-wise distances over their minimal spanning tree constructed in the parameter space using the correlation norm (Cannistraci et al., 2010). Kruskal method was used to build the minimum spanning tree. A matrix of these nonlinear pairwise distances (named minimum curvilinear kernel) was then subjected to singular value decomposition to identify the two principal nonlinear and orthogonal directions along which the highest variation in the data set was observed. The zscore normalized data set was then visualized along these two dimensions. All these steps form the Minimum Curvilinear Embedding (MCE) algorithm that is a type of tuning-free nonlinear principal component analysis (Cannistraci et al., 2013).

Acknowledgements

We thank Michel Labouesse, Peter Gross, Masatoshi Nishikawa and Priyamvada Chugh for a critical reading of the manuscript. SWG was supported by the DFG (SPP 1782, GSC 97, GR 3271/2, GR 3271/3, GR 3271/4), the European Research Council (grant No 281903), ITN grants 281903 and 641639 from the EU, the Max-Planck-Society as a Max-Planck-Fellow, and the Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0023/2014). We thank the light microscopy facility of the BIOTEC/CRTD for excellent support. SRN (LT000078/2016) and SF (LT000871/2014) acknowledge support from the Human Frontier Science Program for their postdoctoral fellowships.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Sundar Ram Naganathan, Email: sundar.naganathan@epfl.ch.

Stephan W Grill, Email: stephan.grill@tu-dresden.de.

Naama Barkai, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.

Naama Barkai, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Open-access funding to Sundar Ram Naganathan.

  • Human Frontier Science Program LT000078/2016 to Sundar Ram Naganathan.

  • Human Frontier Science Program LT000871/2014 to Sebastian Fürthauer.

  • Human Frontier Science Program LT00960/2006 to Josana Rodriguez.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 1782 to Stephan W Grill.

  • European Research Council 281903 to Stephan W Grill.

  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions ITN 281903 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Human Frontier Science Program RGP0023/2014 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GSC 97 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 3271/2 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 3271/3 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 3271/4 to Stephan W Grill.

  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions ITN 641639 to Stephan W Grill.

  • Herchel Smith Postdoctoral Fellowship to Josana Rodriguez.

  • Royal Society Research Grant RG2015R2 to Josana Rodriguez.

  • Newcastle University Faculty Fellowship to Josana Rodriguez.

Additional information

Competing interests

Reviewing editor, eLife.

Reviewing editor, eLife.

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Designed the research, Performed the experiments and analysis.

Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Designed the research, Performed comparisons to hydrodynamic theory.

Data curation, Writing—review and editing, Performed the suppressor screen.

Data curation, Performed the suppressor screen.

Supervision, Writing—review and editing, Performed comparisons to hydrodynamic theory.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Writing—review and editing, Performed the suppressor screen.

Software, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Performed non-linear dimensional reduction.

Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing, Designed the research.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Table of ABPs and suppressor proteins.

ABPs and suppressor proteins that were tested as well as those that were discarded are compiled. Common names of the proteins, their orthologous C. elegans gene names, putative functions, number of hours of RNAi and the number of biological replicates performed for each knockdown are indicated. Star indicates ABPs that were also picked up in the suppressor screen previously performed in the Ahringer lab.

elife-37677-supp1.xlsx (16.2KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.024
Transparent reporting form
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.025

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

References

  1. Bae YH, Ding Z, Zou L, Wells A, Gertler F, Roy P. Loss of profilin-1 expression enhances breast cancer cell motility by Ena/VASP proteins. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2009;219:354–364. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakal C, Aach J, Church G, Perrimon N. Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science. 2007;316:1753–1756. doi: 10.1126/science.1140324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrndt M, Salbreux G, Campinho P, Hauschild R, Oswald F, Roensch J, Grill SW, Heisenberg CP. Forces driving epithelial spreading in zebrafish gastrulation. Science. 2012;338:257–260. doi: 10.1126/science.1224143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanchoin L, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Sykes C, Plastino J. Actin dynamics, architecture, and mechanics in cell motility. Physiological Reviews. 2014;94:235–263. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Böttcher RT, Wiesner S, Braun A, Wimmer R, Berna A, Elad N, Medalia O, Pfeifer A, Aszódi A, Costell M, Fässler R. Profilin 1 is required for abscission during late cytokinesis of chondrocytes. The EMBO Journal. 2009;28:1157–1169. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bray D, White JG. Cortical flow in animal cells. Science. 1988;239:883–888. doi: 10.1126/science.3277283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71-94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Callan-Jones AC, Ruprecht V, Wieser S, Heisenberg CP, Voituriez R. Cortical Flow-Driven shapes of nonadherent cells. Physical Review Letters. 2016;116:102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.028102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cannistraci CV, Ravasi T, Montevecchi FM, Ideker T, Alessio M. Nonlinear dimension reduction and clustering by minimum curvilinearity unfold neuropathic pain and tissue embryological classes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:i531–i539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cannistraci CV, Alanis-Lobato G, Ravasi T. Minimum curvilinearity to enhance topological prediction of protein interactions by network embedding. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:i199–i209. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chugh P, Clark AG, Smith MB, Cassani DAD, Dierkes K, Ragab A, Roux PP, Charras G, Salbreux G, Paluch EK. Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. Nature Cell Biology. 2017;19:689–697. doi: 10.1038/ncb3525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ding WY, Ong HT, Hara Y, Wongsantichon J, Toyama Y, Robinson RC, Nédélec F, Zaidel-Bar R. Plastin increases cortical connectivity to facilitate robust polarization and timely cytokinesis. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2017;216:1371–1386. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201603070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. dos Remedios CG, Chhabra D, Kekic M, Dedova IV, Tsubakihara M, Berry DA, Nosworthy NJ. Actin binding proteins: regulation of cytoskeletal microfilaments. Physiological Reviews. 2003;83:433–473. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Edelman GM, Gally JA. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. PNAS. 2001;98:13763–13768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231499798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fievet BT, Rodriguez J, Naganathan S, Lee C, Zeiser E, Ishidate T, Shirayama M, Grill S, Ahringer J. Systematic genetic interaction screens uncover cell polarity regulators and functional redundancy. Nature Cell Biology. 2013;15:103–112. doi: 10.1038/ncb2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fürthauer S, Strempel M, Grill SW, Jülicher F. Active chiral. The European Physical Journal E. 2012;35:89. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2012-12089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fürthauer S, Strempel M, Grill SW, Jülicher F. Active chiral processes in thin films. Physical Review Letters. 2013;110:48103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.048103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Girard KD, Chaney C, Delannoy M, Kuo SC, Robinson DN. Dynacortin contributes to cortical viscoelasticity and helps define the shape changes of cytokinesis. The EMBO Journal. 2004;23:1536–1546. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goehring NW, Trong PK, Bois JS, Chowdhury D, Nicola EM, Hyman AA, Grill SW. Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science. 2011;334:1137–1141. doi: 10.1126/science.1208619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gorfinkiel N. From actomyosin oscillations to tissue-level deformations. Developmental Dynamics. 2016;245:268–275. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hall DH, Hedgecock EM. Kinesin-related gene unc-104 is required for axonal transport of synaptic vesicles in C. elegans. Cell. 1991;65:837–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90391-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen GM, Barnhart EL, Marriott G, Mogilner A, Theriot JA. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature. 2008;453:475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature06952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lieleg O, Claessens MMAE, Bausch AR. Structure and dynamics of cross-linked actin networks. Soft Matter. 2010;6:218–225. doi: 10.1039/B912163N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu YJ, Le Berre M, Lautenschlaeger F, Maiuri P, Callan-Jones A, Heuzé M, Takaki T, Voituriez R, Piel M. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell. 2015;160:659–672. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo W, Yu CH, Lieu ZZ, Allard J, Mogilner A, Sheetz MP, Bershadsky AD. Analysis of the local organization and dynamics of cellular actin networks. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2013;202:1057–1073. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201210123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maiuri P, Rupprecht JF, Wieser S, Ruprecht V, Bénichou O, Carpi N, Coppey M, De Beco S, Gov N, Heisenberg CP, Lage Crespo C, Lautenschlaeger F, Le Berre M, Lennon-Dumenil AM, Raab M, Thiam HR, Piel M, Sixt M, Voituriez R. Actin flows mediate a universal coupling between cell speed and cell persistence. Cell. 2015;161:374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marchetti MC, Joanny JF, Ramaswamy S, Liverpool TB, Prost J, Rao M, Simha RA. Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2013;85:1143–1189. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mayer M, Depken M, Bois JS, Jülicher F, Grill SW. Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows. Nature. 2010;467:617–621. doi: 10.1038/nature09376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mendes Pinto I, Rubinstein B, Kucharavy A, Unruh JR, Li R. Actin depolymerization drives actomyosin ring contraction during budding yeast cytokinesis. Developmental cell. 2012;22:1247–1260. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohr SE, Perrimon N. RNAi screening: new approaches, understandings, and organisms. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA. 2012;3:145–158. doi: 10.1002/wrna.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mukhina S, Wang YL, Murata-Hori M. Alpha-actinin is required for tightly regulated remodeling of the actin cortical network during cytokinesis. Developmental Cell. 2007;13:554–565. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Munjal A, Philippe JM, Munro E, Lecuit T. A self-organized biomechanical network drives shape changes during tissue morphogenesis. Nature. 2015;524:351–355. doi: 10.1038/nature14603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Developmental Cell. 2004;7:413–424. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Muscoloni A, Thomas JM, Ciucci S, Bianconi G, Cannistraci CV. Machine learning meets complex networks via coalescent embedding in the hyperbolic space. Nature Communications. 2017;8:1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01825-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Naganathan SR, Fürthauer S, Nishikawa M, Jülicher F, Grill SW. Active torque generation by the actomyosin cell cortex drives left-right symmetry breaking. eLife. 2014;3:e04165. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Naganathan SR, Middelkoop TC, Fürthauer S, Grill SW. Actomyosin-driven left-right asymmetry: from molecular torques to chiral self organization. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2016;38:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nishikawa M, Naganathan SR, Jülicher F, Grill SW. Controlling contractile instabilities in the actomyosin cortex. eLife. 2017;6:e19595. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perrimon N, Ni JQ, Perkins L. In vivo RNAi: today and tomorrow. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2010;2:a003640. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pohl C, Bao Z. Chiral forces organize left-right patterning in C. elegans by uncoupling midline and anteroposterior axis. Developmental Cell. 2010;19:402–412. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pollard TD, Cooper JA. Actin and actin-binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1986;55:987–1035. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J. Particle Image Velocimetry - A Practical Guide. Second edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. Reymann AC, Boujemaa-Paterski R, Martiel JL, Guérin C, Cao W, Chin HF, De La Cruz EM, Théry M, Blanchoin L. Actin network architecture can determine myosin motor activity. Science. 2012;336:1310–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.1221708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reymann AC, Staniscia F, Erzberger A, Salbreux G, Grill SW. Cortical flow aligns actin filaments to form a furrow. eLife. 2016;5:e17807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruprecht V, Wieser S, Callan-Jones A, Smutny M, Morita H, Sako K, Barone V, Ritsch-Marte M, Sixt M, Voituriez R, Heisenberg CP. Cortical contractility triggers a stochastic switch to fast amoeboid cell motility. Cell. 2015;160:673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Salbreux G, Prost J, Joanny JF. Hydrodynamics of cellular cortical flows and the formation of contractile rings. Physical Review Letters. 2009;103:58102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.058102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schonegg S, Constantinescu AT, Hoege C, Hyman AA. The Rho GTPase-activating proteins RGA-3 and RGA-4 are required to set the initial size of PAR domains in Caenorhabditis elegans one-cell embryos. PNAS. 2007;104:14976–14981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706941104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schonegg S, Hyman AA, Wood WB. Timing and mechanism of the initial cue establishing handed left–right asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Genesis. 2014;52:572–580. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shinomiya H. Plastin family of actin-bundling proteins: its functions in leukocytes, neurons, intestines, and cancer. International Journal of Cell Biology. 2012;2012:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2012/213492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Singh D, Pohl C. Coupling of rotational cortical flow, asymmetric midbody positioning, and spindle rotation mediates dorsoventral axis formation in C. elegans. Developmental Cell. 2014;28:253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sönnichsen B, Koski LB, Walsh A, Marschall P, Neumann B, Brehm M, Alleaume AM, Artelt J, Bettencourt P, Cassin E, Hewitson M, Holz C, Khan M, Lazik S, Martin C, Nitzsche B, Ruer M, Stamford J, Winzi M, Heinkel R, Röder M, Finell J, Häntsch H, Jones SJ, Jones M, Piano F, Gunsalus KC, Oegema K, Gönczy P, Coulson A, Hyman AA, Echeverri CJ. Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005;434:462–469. doi: 10.1038/nature03353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stricker J, Falzone T, Gardel ML. Mechanics of the F-actin cytoskeleton. Journal of Biomechanics. 2010;43:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Timmons L, Court DL, Fire A. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene. 2001;263:103–112. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00579-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tjhung E, Tiribocchi A, Marenduzzo D, Cates ME. A minimal physical model captures the shapes of crawling cells. Nature Communications. 2015;6:5420. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Turlier H, Audoly B, Prost J, Joanny JF. Furrow constriction in animal cell cytokinesis. Biophysical Journal. 2014;106:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Whitacre J, Bender A. Degeneracy: a design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2010;263:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Whitacre JM. Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 2010;7:6–17. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-7-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiggan O, Shaw AE, DeLuca JG, Bamburg JR. ADF/cofilin regulates actomyosin assembly through competitive inhibition of myosin II binding to F-actin. Developmental Cell. 2012;22:530–543. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Winder SJ, Proteins A-B. Actin-binding proteins. Journal of Cell Science. 2005;118:651–654. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang R, Zhang C, Zhao Q, Li D. Spectrin: structure, function and disease. Science China Life Sciences. 2013;56:1076–1085. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4575-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou HM, Brust-Mascher I, Scholey JM. Direct visualization of the movement of the monomeric axonal transport motor UNC-104 along neuronal processes in living Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21:3749–3755. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-11-03749.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Naama Barkai1

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your article "Morphogenetic degeneracies in the actomyosin cortex" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by Naama Barkai as the Senior Editor, a Reviewing Editor and two peer reviewers. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal his identity: Stefan Wieser (Reviewer #1).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor and agreed that this paper provides an important contribution to the literature. Several points in the paper, however, require further discussion, as is detailed in the individual reviewers. Please address all comments below in the revised version.

Reviewer #1:

S.R. Naganathan and co-authors present an RNAi based screen combined with quantitative live-imaging to identify molecular candidates underlying the large-scale physical properties of the cell cortex.

This work is a very interesting contribution towards advancing our current understanding of how individual molecular players determine distinct emergent properties at the cytoskeleton level which are related to cellular function. The authors perform a rigorous and extensive image-based RNAi interference screen in the C. elegans zygote to map diverse molecular actin binding proteins (ABPs) and actin regulatory proteins to bulk mechanical properties of the cell cortex such as flow speed /v, hydrodynamics length scale /λ and chirality /c. These large-scale actomyosin properties create a parameter space with low correlation to identify the contribution of molecular components to mostly independent large-scale properties. The authors identify previously unrecognized molecular modulators of actomyosin cortex dynamics and their analysis reveals that different molecular players converge on modulating the same large-scale cortical properties. This leads the authors to propose a "morphogenetic degeneracy" in which multiple molecular components modulate the same emergent physical cortex characteristics. They speculate that this behaviour is potentially relevant for the robustness of dynamic cellular processes in development.

This work is a relevant contribution to the field of cytoskeleton and cellular dynamics with interesting resources and data sets relevant to a broad scientific community. The article is very well structured and written and presents and summarises the results in an appropriate way.

One concern is related to the argument about "morphogenetic degeneracy". Although this argument catches attention, the finding that different molecular players impact on the same global physical properties of a composite material such as the cell cortex might be expected. The authors speculate about the potential impact of degeneracy on robustness – which is exciting – but awaits future experimental tests.

Reviewer #2:

This paper presents an in-depth quantitative study of the role of actin binding proteins (ABPs) in the dynamics of the actomyosin cortex of C. elegans zygotes. The authors perform a rather extensive RNAi screen of ABPs, associated with a quantitative analysis of actomyosin dynamics, which allows to extract several biophysical parameters (friction length, active torque, period of oscillations etc.). This leads to the quantification of the effect of various molecular players in cortical dynamics. The authors then identify classes of ABPs having a similar impact on the cortex dynamics and put forward the concept of morphogenetic degeneracy.

The paper is very well written, clear, and based on solid observations and arguments. A quantitative analysis of the effect of ABPs on actomyosin dynamics at this level is new to the best of my knowledge and will be surely useful for the community. To me the only disappointing aspect of such study is probably the lack of surprising conclusion or novel effect (which again does not diminish the value of their quantitative analysis). The authors put forward in the discussion the concept of morphogenetic degeneracy. In my opinion their approach inherently leads to some degeneracy, since it relies on a fitting procedure to a coarse-grained physical model, which by definition accounts for the zoo of microscopic degrees of freedom (ABPs) through only a few mesoscopic parameters (e.g. viscosity, friction). It is important that the authors justify why their results go beyond such a trivial degeneracy. To me the interesting side of this discussion would rather be the clustering into classes of ABPs with similar functions; the robustness of such classification however not clear at this stage and is likely to depend on the choice of hydrodynamic model, clustering algorithm.

To conclude, given the quality of the results I recommend publication, provided that the authors provide a more critical discussion of the observed degeneracy that claim. The following points should also be addressed for clarity:

– The choice of hydrodynamic model has the merit to be probably the simplest one that provides good fit to data. Since it neglects pressure like forces in the gel it does not require to explicitly take into actin turn-over dynamics. This can give the erroneous impression that the dynamics is independent of actin turn over dynamics. Since the effect of ABPs acting on actin turn-over is analysed, this should be commented. The limitations of the model should be briefly stated (newtonian fluid, linear friction among others).

– In the fitting procedure the authors take the active stress as proportional to myosin intensity. This should be commented upon. In particular the authors show that myosin clustering (size and density) can have opposite effects, which could sound contradictory.

– The hydrodynamic model as given does not lead to oscillatory behaviour, those require other ingredients. This should be stated.

– In subsection “Dimensional reduction analysis reveals clusters with similar effects on cortical mechanics”, the authors say: “Increasing F-actin density throughout the cytosol is likely to increase cytoplasmic viscosity, which in turn would lead to an increased effective friction and a reduced hydrodynamic length.” Given the definition of friction length as the ratio of viscosity and friction (root of) I don't see why.

– As a general comment, the author analysed isolated perturbations of ABPs, and therefore miss cooperativity in ABPs, which might be important.

eLife. 2018 Oct 22;7:e37677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37677.028

Author response


Reviewer #2:

[…]

To conclude, given the quality of the results I recommend publication, provided that the authors provide a more critical discussion of the observed degeneracy that claim. The following points should also be addressed for clarity:

We thank the reviewer for the encouraging comments. In response to the ‘trivial degeneracy’, this is a very good point that perhaps was not clear in our original submission. We have now rewritten much of the discussion and have added a new paragraph that discusses this point. Briefly, we are suggesting that there is an intermediate layer at the mesoscale that is important to consider, and that has not been systematically investigated before. Phenotypes at larger scales are determined by unusual material properties of living matter at this mesoscale, together with force and torque generation. Now, material properties at the mesoscale arise through coarse-graining and averaging microscopic degrees of freedom, and only a small set of mesoscopic physical parameters contribute to the force balance and the dynamics of the system at the mesoscale. This gives rise to a degeneracy, but this ‘morphogenetic degeneracy’ at the mesoscale is of physical nature and can arise in the absence of redundancy of molecular activity. We think that this is an important distinction to make, and we here outline an approach that allows to map out this physical degeneracy between molecular activities and mesoscale physical properties that determine phenotypes.

Finally, we would like to note that the clustering result is not entirely dependent on the coarse-grained model we have used, and has quantifications (flow velocity, oscillation period and foci structure) that do not depend on our physical model. We have now included a new figure that shows the contribution of each quantification to the final clustering result (Figure 7—figure supplement 4).

Degeneracy is easy to understand from a physics perspective but important to investigate in biology where they are likely to provide a cell/tissue/embryo with robustness against noise and perturbations (Wagner, 2005; Whitacre, 2010; Whitacre and Bender, 2010). A key question for the future will be to investigate the extent to which degeneracy facilitates further evolution and innovation of regulatory systems. Moreover, to address the link between physical degeneracy and biological robustness in the case of cortical flow, an analysis of PAR dynamics and polarity establishment across actin binding protein knockdown conditions is essential, which is beyond the scope of this manuscript.

We have now included these arguments in the discussion, which was rewritten to a large extent in respond to this and other concerns.

– The choice of hydrodynamic model has the merit to be probably the simplest one that provides good fit to data. Since it neglects pressure like forces in the gel it does not require to explicitly take into actin turn-over dynamics. This can give the erroneous impression that the dynamics is independent of actin turn over dynamics. Since the effect of ABPs acting on actin turn-over is analysed, this should be commented. The limitations of the model should be briefly stated (newtonian fluid, linear friction among others).

The theory for cortical flows that we use to extract the hydrodynamic length and the chirality index is the result of a rigorous derivation from a generic phenomenological theory for active chiral fluids (Fuerthauer et al., 2013). The steps of the derivation are laid out in the Appendix of Naganathan et al. (2014). The resulting theory is compressible in two dimensions but is built on top of a three-dimensional incompressible fluid theory. The important assumptions in the derivation of the theory are: (i) the cortex is viscous on the time scales of cortical flows and thus has no elastic term. This is a consequence of cortical turnover and one might guess that a cortex without turnover might behave more like an elastic gel. Assuming a viscous cortex therefore indirectly takes into account actin and myosin turnover. (ii) A specific relation between the bulk viscosity and shear viscosity of the actomyosin gel was assumed, and they are set equal. (iii) The friction term can be considered linear and local.

The referee is correct that this ratio of one is a simplification. It is, however, possible to motivate different ratios of bulk to shear viscosity, depending on how the transition from a 3D bulk active chiral fluid to a 2D surface active chiral fluid is pursued. We would like to point out here that we had in the course of our original work where we presented our discovery of chiral flows in C. elegans (Naganathan et al., 2014) also utilized different ratios of this quantity. However, since we have decoupled flows in x- from flows in y-velocities in this earlier manuscript, changing this ratio essentially has the effect of simply renormalizing other physical parameters like the chirality index, without an apparent impact on the quality of fit. Hence, we had chosen to set the ratio to one for simplicity. In this manuscript here, we also decouple flows in x- from flows in y-direction in our analysis, and thus have kept this ratio at one as well.

We have now included a brief discussion in the Materials and methods section.

– In the fitting procedure the authors take the active stress as proportional to myosin intensity. This should be commented upon. In particular the authors show that myosin clustering (size and density) can have opposite effects, which could sound contradictory.

Myosin is the main driver of cortical flow. This has been extensively validated in Mayer et al. (2010) and for chiral flows in Naganathan et al. (2014). These papers show that active stresses are growing functions μ(c) of myosin concentration c. The exact functional form is unknown and might very well depend on the structure of the underlying actomyosin cortex. Here, we report the first order coefficient (linear response coefficient) of a Taylor expansion of μ(c) and its chiral counterpart. Our theory makes no predictions on how the structure of the cortex affects flows. We now better explain this in the methods section.

– The hydrodynamic model as given does not lead to oscillatory behaviour, those require other ingredients. This should be stated.

The reviewer is right in stating that the current hydrodynamic model does not lead to oscillatory behavior. Oscillations in the actomyosin cortex were shown in an earlier work (Nishikawa et al., 2017) to depend on independent oscillations in the Rho signaling pathway that regulates myosin activity. This can be incorporated into a similar hydrodynamic model, which goes beyond the scope of the current manuscript. We have now explicitly stated this in the methods section.

– In subsection “Dimensional reduction analysis reveals clusters with similar effects on cortical mechanics”, the authors say: “Increasing F-actin density throughout the cytosol is likely to increase cytoplasmic viscosity, which in turn would lead to an increased effective friction and a reduced hydrodynamic length.” Given the definition of friction length as the ratio of viscosity and friction (root of) I don't see why.

Unlike an increased F-actin density in the cortex itself, which would affect the cortical viscosity and its effective friction in the same way, thus leaving the hydrodynamic length unchanged, an increase in cytosolic F-actin will only affect the boundary condition between the cortex and the cytoplasm. Thus, it would increase the friction and not the cortical viscosity leading to a reduced hydrodynamic length.

– As a general comment, the author analysed isolated perturbations of ABPs, and therefore miss cooperativity in ABPs, which might be important.

We agree with the referee that ABPs are likely to function in a cooperative fashion and that considering the interaction between ABPs might lead to interesting and unexpected results. This however goes beyond the scope of the present paper.

References:

Wagner A. (2005) Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. BioEssays, 27(2):176-88

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary file 1. Table of ABPs and suppressor proteins.

    ABPs and suppressor proteins that were tested as well as those that were discarded are compiled. Common names of the proteins, their orthologous C. elegans gene names, putative functions, number of hours of RNAi and the number of biological replicates performed for each knockdown are indicated. Star indicates ABPs that were also picked up in the suppressor screen previously performed in the Ahringer lab.

    elife-37677-supp1.xlsx (16.2KB, xlsx)
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.024
    Transparent reporting form
    DOI: 10.7554/eLife.37677.025

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES