Skip to main content
Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine logoLink to Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine
. 2018 Sep 5;2(4):357–358. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2018.8.39493

Massive Right Breast Hematoma

Manish Amin 1,, Jason P Jerome 1, Phillip Aguìñiga-Navarrete 1, Laura C Castro 1
PMCID: PMC6230366  PMID: 30443627

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old female with a history of hypertension, congestive heart failure, and generalized anxiety disorder taking 81 milligrams of aspirin daily presented as a trauma activation following a motor vehicle collision. She was the restrained driver of a vehicle traveling at approximately 45 miles per hour that was rear-ended by another vehicle traveling at unknown speed. Airbags were deployed. The patient was extricated by first responders.

Upon presentation to the emergency department she was complaining of severe right breast pain. She was initially tachycardic at 115 beats per minute with a blood pressure of 128/60 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Her primary survey was intact and her secondary survey was significant for ecchymosis to her right breast, which was swollen, tense and exquisitely tender (Image 1). No further evidence of trauma was noted.

Image 1.

Image 1

Photograph of patient showing massive right breast hematoma.

After the primary survey her right breast continued to expand and her blood pressure was noted to deteriorate to a recorded low of 99/52 mmHg despite a fluid bolus and blood transfusion. A computed tomography of the chest demonstrated a 10.5 cm × 12.7 cm × 18 cm breast hematoma (Image 2). Remarkably, there was no evidence of other concomitant injuries. Due to her consistently labile blood pressures trauma surgery elected to manage the patient operatively. A 1,500-milliliters hematoma was evacuated, consistent with the patient’s state of class III shock. Origin of the bleeding was determined to be an arterial branch within the pectoralis major. The patient was taking aspirin, causing presumed platelet dysfunction, but her coagulation panel was normal.

Image 2.

Image 2

Axial view of a computed tomography of the chest revealing large right breast hematoma (red circle).

DISCUSSION

Among cases of blunt chest trauma in females, breast hematoma is relatively uncommon, occurring in less than 2%. More than 93.5% are managed expectantly with only 6.5% requiring invasive procedures.1 To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of a massive breast hematoma resulting from blunt chest trauma without concomitant injuries demonstrating a state of Class III shock.2 A similar computed tomography image has been published.3 Nevertheless, the primary difference between this case and the case in the cited image is that the patient in the cited case had concomitant rib fractures and was treated with interventional radiology embolization, whereas the patient in this presentation was treated operatively and had no concomitant injuries. This case illustrates another compartment where hemodynamically-significant bleeding can occur in the setting of trauma.

CPC-EM Capsule.

What do we already know about this clinical entity?

Breast hematomas are relatively uncommon, occurring in less than 2% of blunt chest trauma. More than 93.5% are managed expectantly, with only 6.5% requiring invasive procedures.

What is the major impact of the image(s)?

To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of an isolated massive breast hematoma resulting from blunt chest trauma demonstrating a state of Class III shock.

How might this improve emergency medicine practice?

It may raise suspicion among emergency providers that hemodynamic compromise may be due to an isolated breast hematoma.

Documented patient informed consent and/or Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained and filed for publication of this case report.

Footnotes

Section Editor: Shadi Lahham, MD, MS

Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_cpcem

Conflicts of Interest: By the CPC-EM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sanders C, Cipolla J, Stehly C, et al. Blunt breast trauma: is there a standard of care? Am Surg. 2011;77(8):1066–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paddle AM, Morrison WA. Seat belt injury to the female breast: review and discussion of its surgical management. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(1–2):71–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Madden B, Phadtare M, Ayoub Z, et al. Hemorrhagic shock from breast blunt trauma. Int J Emerg Med. 2015;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0083-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Irvine

RESOURCES