Abstract
A 90-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of a positive fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy revealed a lesion with multiple nodules covered with abundant mucus at the hepatic flexure. Computed tomography showed a dilated appendix attached distally to the hepatic flexure. Right hemicolectomy was performed, and the pathological examination revealed a mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma infiltrating the hepatic flexure without pseudomyxoma peritonei. The patient is doing well without recurrence 12 months postoperatively. Extraperitoneal drainage of the malignant ascites caused by the fistula may allow for an early diagnosis, while also making it possible to successfully resect the lesion, thus resulting in a favorable outcome.
Keywords: mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, fistula formation, prognosis
Introduction
Appendiceal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy, accounting for only 0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies (1). A mucinous type of appendiceal adenocarcinoma (MAA) is frequently accompanied by mucocele (2). The tumor itself is not aggressive; however, the disease has an unfavorable prognosis due to the absence of specific symptoms and the potential of tumor rupture, resulting in difficulty achieving an early diagnosis (3-5). Mucocele rupture leads to pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), which is the dissemination of malignant cells in the intraperitoneal cavity (6). Fistula formation into adjacent organs is an unusual presentation of MAA. Although some authors have reported that fistula formation might improve the patient outcome by preventing the development of PMP (7, 8), the prognosis of such cases remains unclear.
We herein report a case of MAA with fistula formation and review the pertinent literature to discuss the clinical features and prognostic impact of this rare manifestation.
Case Report
A 90-year-old man with no significant medical history was referred to our hospital for a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT). No remarkable findings were noted in a physical examination. A laboratory analysis revealed a slightly decreased level of hemoglobin (12.7 g/dL; normal range 13.4-17.6 g/dL). Tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9) were normal. Colonoscopy revealed multiple nodules forming a mass-like lesion 35 mm in diameter and covered with a large amount of mucus at the hepatic flexure of the colon (Fig. 1). Mucinous colon carcinoma was suspected, but biopsies from the lesion showed only mucus products and granulation tissue. Other colonoscopy findings included an elevated lesion with multiple small granular protrusions covered with intact epithelium at the appendiceal orifice (Fig. 2). The biopsy from the appendiceal orifice was negative for cancer cells.
Figure 1.

Colonoscopy revealed multiple nodules forming a mass-like lesion covered with a large amount of mucus, 35 mm in diameter, at the hepatic flexure.
Figure 2.

Other colonoscopy findings included an elevated lesion with multiple small granular protrusions covered with intact epithelium at the appendiceal orifice.
A barium enema (BE) showed extrinsic compression at the ileocecum and a filling defect at the hepatic flexure of colon, but the appendix could not be visualized (Fig. 3). Thus, abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed and revealed a dilated appendix adhering to the hepatic flexure (Fig. 4). A second colonoscopy was then performed. A repeat biopsy from the lesion at the hepatic flexure was positive for mucinous adenocarcinoma. The biopsy from the appendiceal orifice was also positive for adenocarcinoma, which infiltrated the submucosal layer. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of appendiceal carcinoma with fistula to the hepatic flexure was established. He had neither distant metastasis nor peritoneal dissemination.
Figure 3.

A barium enema showed extrinsic compression at the ileocecum and a filling defect at the hepatic flexure of colon (arrow), but the appendix could not be visualized.
Figure 4.

Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (coronal image) revealed a dilated appendix adherent to the hepatic flexure (arrow).
En bloc right hemicolectomy with extended lymph node dissection was performed for curative resection. A pathological examination revealed a well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma originating from the appendiceal tip, which infiltrated the hepatic flexure with histological negative margins (Fig. 5). One of the 27 resected lymph nodes was positive. The final pathological stage was T4bN1M0. No adjuvant chemotherapy was performed because of his advanced age. The postoperative course was good with no signs of recurrence at the time of writing (follow-up period: 12 months).
Figure 5.
A: Macroscopically, the appendiceal tumor had invaded the hepatic flexure with fistula formation (arrows). B: Histological findings showed a well-differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (Hematoxylin and Eosin staining; magnification, ×20).
Discussion
Appendiceal carcinoma is a rare malignancy that comprises less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies (1). This disease is classified into five histological subtypes: colonic-type adenocarcinoma, mucinous type (MAA), signet ring cell type, goblet cell carcinoid, and malignant carcinoid. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate depends on the histologic subtypes, ranging from 93% for carcinoid to 27% for signet ring cell type (3). Although the tumor itself is well-differentiated and not typically aggressive, the disease-specific survival rate of MAA is only 58%. This unfavorable outcome can be explained by the potential for mucocele rupture as well as a delayed or inaccurate diagnosis as a result of nonspecific symptoms (4, 5).
A ruptured mucocele can result in the peritoneal spread of mucus material followed by mucinous ascites, known as PMP. Smeenk et al. reported that 20% of patients with appendiceal mucinous tumor (73% benign, 27% malignant) develop PMP (6). The most common symptoms included appendicitis-like events, increasing abdominal distention, and new onset hernia (9). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 51% and 38%, respectively, for patients with PMP from MAA (10). This suggests that malignant ascites is associated with a worse prognosis than overall MAA. The treatment of patients with PMP depends on the resectability of the tumor. The recommended treatment for invasive MAA is right hemicolectomy with lymph node dissection for complete resection (11). Taken together, these data indicate that obtaining a diagnosis during the resectable stage of MAA is crucial to ensuring a good prognosis.
In the present case, the positive result of FOBT caused by the fistula formation led to further investigations, such as colonoscopy, BE, and CT. Thus, an early and accurate preoperative diagnosis was made before progression to PMP. Our search of a medical literature database showed that only 29 cases of MAA with fistula formation have been reported in the English literature. The clinical characteristics of these previous patients and our own are summarized in Table (7, 8, 12-36). The patients were 19 women and 11 men with a median age of 65.5 years (range, 38 to 90). The organs involved in the fistula were the bladder (n=16), skin (n=9), colon (n=4), vagina (n=2), and ileum (n=1). Chief complaints were associated with blood or mucus discharge from the involved organs in almost all of the patients. Appendiceal tumor was diagnosed in 14 (70%) of the 20 patients, while PMP was observed in only 3 (12.5%) of the 24 patients. Surgery was performed as primary treatment in all cases but two. The median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 3 days to 120 months), and follow-up information was available for all 24 cases. Twenty patients (83.3%) were alive at the end of the follow-up period; of them, only 1 had cancer recurrence. However, 4 patients (16.7%) died, but among them, 2 died of other diseases.
Table.
Summary of Cases of MAA with Fistula Formation.
| Reference | Age/ sex |
Fistula location | Chief complaints | Presumed diagnosis | Therapy | PMP | Follow-up | Cause of death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 82/F | Bladder | Hematuria, fecaluria | Large bowel tumor invading urinary bladder | Anterior pelvic exenteration | No | Alive (84Mo) | - |
| 13 | 57/M | Skin | Weight loss, skin fistula in the old appendectomy scar | - | RHC, SE | - | Died (3days) | Acute cardiac failure |
| 14 | 50/M | Bladder | Pyuria, dysuria | Appendiceal adenocarcinoma | Radical cystoprostatectomy, RHC, RT | - | Alive (24Mo) | - |
| 15 | 58/M | Bladder | Pollakiuria, urinary urgency | Bladder cancer | RHC, PC, RT | - | - | - |
| 16 | 82/F | Bladder | Urinary tract infections, lethargy, nausea, increasing obtundation | - | RHC, PC | No | - | - |
| 17 | 85/F | Vagina | Vaginal discharge, rectal bleeding, constipation, urinary incontinence | MAA | ICR, partial vaginal resection | - | Alive (9Mo) | - |
| 18 | 60/F | Skin | Mucinous discharge from a skin fistula in the old appendectomy scar | MAA | RT | No | Died (6Mo) | Gastric cancer |
| 19 | 70/F | Bladder | Hematuria | - | PC, ICR, RT | - | Alive (120Mo) | - |
| 19 | 67/F | Bladder | Hematuria | - | PC, RHC | - | Died (72Mo) | Appendiceal carcinoma |
| 20 | 67/M | Bladder | Dysuria, pollakiuria | Appendiceal neoplasm | RHC, PC, AC | No | - | - |
| 21 | 80/F | Bladder | Hematuria | - | RHC, PC | No | Alive (9Mo) | - |
| 22 | 56/M | Skin | Right iliac fossa pain, pyrexia, leukocytosis | MAA | RT | Yes | Died (39Mo) | Appendiceal carcinoma |
| 23 | 46/M | Skin | Skin ulcers | Scrofuloderma, tuberculosis, pseudomyxoma, malignant tumor of the ascending colon, cecum, appendix, or retroperitoneum | RHC | No | Recurrence (3Mo) | - |
| 24 | 78/F | Bladder | Pollakiuria, micturition pain | Cecal or appendiceal tumor | RHC, PC | No | Alive (12Mo) | - |
| 7 | 75/F | Skin | Skin ulcer with mucus discharge | Appendiceal carcinoma, colonic adenocarcinoma, ovarian adenocarcinoma | RHC, SE | No | Alive (84Mo) | - |
| 25 | 60/F | Skin | Skin swelling | Myxoid variant of liposarcoma or desmoid tumor | RHC, SE | No | Alive (2Mo) | - |
| 26 | 48/F | Vagina | Lower abdominal pain, vomiting, anorexia, pyrexia | Diverticulitis | Ap, rectosigmoid resection, oophorectomy | No | - | - |
| 27 | 67/F | Bladder | Urinary tract infections, hematuria, pollakiuria, urinary urgency | Colonic cancer | RHC, PC | No | Alive (3Mo) | - |
| 28 | 59/F | Ascending colon | Right lower quadrant abdominal pain | MAA | RHC | No | Alive (6Mo) | - |
| 29 | 44/F | Bladder | Right lower quadrant abdominal pain, hematuria | MAA | RHC, PC, right salpingo-oophorectomy, AC | Yes | - | - |
| 30 | 51/F | Skin | Skin ulcer with mucus discharge | - | Ap including a portion of the iliac bone, AC | No | Alive (36Mo) | - |
| 31 | 38/M | Small bowel, sigmoid colon, bladder | Abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, hematuria | Crohn’s disease, sigmoid malignancy small bowel malignancy or lymphoma | RHC, Sx, PC, AC | No | Alive (10Mo) | - |
| 32 | 68/F | Skin | Skin swelling | Acute appendicitis, appendiceal carcinoma | RHC, SE, AC | No | - | - |
| 33 | 64/F | Bladder | Abdominal discomfort, pollakiuria | - | RHC, PC, AC | No | Alive (2Mo) | - |
| 34 | 68/M | Skin | Mucinous discharge from a skin fistula in the old appendectomy scar | - | RHC, SE, HIPEC | No | Alive (12Mo) | - |
| 35 | 63/M | Bladder | Dysuria, mucusuria | Appendiceal pseudomyxoma | ICR, PC, electrovaporization of gelatinous nodules, HIPEC | Yes | Alive (15Mo) | - |
| 36 | 45/F | Bladder | Pyuria, mucusuria | - | RHC, PC | No | Alive (60Mo) | - |
| 36 | 78/F | Bladder | Mucusuria | Appendiceal carcinoma | RHC, PC | No | Alive (36Mo) | - |
| 8 | 68/M | Sigmoid colon | Right lower quadrant abdominal pain, tenderness, constipation | - | Ap, Sx, ICR, resection of right vas deferens, testicular vessels, anterior abdominal wall | No | Alive (12Mo) | - |
| Our case | 90/M | Hepatic flexure | Positive fecal occult blood test | Appendiceal carcinoma | RHC | No | Alive (12Mo) | - |
AC: adjuvant chemotherapy, Ap: appendectomy, F: female, HIPEC: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, ICR: ileocecal resection, M: male, MAA: mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma, Mo: months, PC: partial cystectomy, PMP: pseudomyxoma peritonei, RHC: right hemicolectomy, RT: radiotherapy, SE: skin excision, Sx: sigmoidectomy
Our literature review suggests that, as in our case, the symptoms caused by the fistula led to a further investigation and an early accurate diagnosis, which resulted in the potential for curative resectability. PMP is less frequently observed than typical appendiceal mucinous tumors in patients with MAA with a fistula. Nakao et al. and Hakim et al. reported that fistula formation might improve the prognosis by preventing PMP (7, 8). Fistula formation secondary to MAA may confine the disease to a resectable state by causing drainage of the malignant ascites into the involved organs. The operability itself may explain the good outcome of MAA with fistula formation; indeed, surgery was performed in almost all of the reported cases. However, a publication bias cannot be excluded, so further studies are required to determine the influence of fistula formation on the prognosis of patients with MAA.
We herein report the case of a 90-year-old man with MAA with fistula to the hepatic flexure. Our case shows that fistula formation secondary to MAA may allow for the early diagnosis and resectability, which results in a better prognosis.
The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
References
- 1.Chang P, Attiyeh FF. Adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Dis Colon Rectum 24: 176-180, 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sugarbaker PH. Epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. Cancer J 15: 225-235, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Turaga KK, Pappas SG, Gamblin T. Importance of histologic subtype in the staging of appendiceal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 1379-1385, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marmor S, Portschy PR, Tuttle TM, Virnig BA. The rise in appendiceal cancer incidence: 2000-2009. J Gastrointest Surg 19: 743-750, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973-1998. Cancer 94: 3307-3312, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA. Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34: 196-201, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nakao A, Sato S, Nakashima A, Nabeyama A, Tanaka N. Appendiceal mucocele of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with a cutaneous fistula. J Int Med Res 30: 452-456, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hakim S, Amin M, Cappell MS. Limited, local, extracolonic spread of mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma after perforation with formation of a malignant appendix-to-sigmoid fistula: case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 22: 8624-8630, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Esquivel J, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical presentation of the Pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome. Br J Surg 87: 1414-1418, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ihemelandu C, Sugarbaker PH. Clinicopathologic and prognostic features in patients with peritoneal metastasis from mucinous adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells, and adenocarcinoid of the appendix treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 23: 1474-1480, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Misdraji J. Mucinous epithelial neoplasms of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol 28: S67-S79, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Higa E, Rosai J, Pizzimbono CA, Wise L. Mucosal hyperplasia, mucinous cystadenoma, and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix. A re-evaluation of appendiceal “mucocele”. Cancer 32: 1525-1541, 1973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Andersson A, Bergdahl L, Boquist L. Primary carcinoma of the appendix. Ann Surg 183: 53-57, 1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richie JP. Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix masquerading as a bladder tumor. Arch Surg 112: 666-667, 1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Henry R, Bracken RB, Ayala A. Appendiceal carcinoma mimicking primary bladder cancer. J Urol 123: 590-591, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dalton DP, Dalkin BL, Sener SF, Pappas PS, Blum MD. Enterovesical fistula secondary to mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix. J Urol 138: 617-618, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kneece SM, Wackym PA, Dudley BS, Sawyers JL, Gray GF Jr. Appendicovaginal fistula and primary appendiceal cystadenocarcinoma. South Med J 80: 914-916, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nishitani K, Nishitani H, Shimoda Y. Cutaneous invasion of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. J Dermatol 14: 167-169, 1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen KT, Spaulding RW. Appendiceal carcinoma masquerading as primary bladder carcinoma. J Urol 145: 821-822, 1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ikeda I, Miura T, Kondo I. Case of vesico-appendiceal fistula secondary to mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. J Urol 153: 1220-1221, 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dahms SE, Hohenfellner M, Eggersmann C, Lampel A, Golz R, Thüroff JW. Appendix carcinoma invading the urinary bladder. Urol Int 58: 124-127, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Steven KJ, Dunn WK, Balfour T. Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei: a lethal complication of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Am J Gastroenterol 92: 1920-1922, 1997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Koizumi J, Noguchi H. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei with spontaneous skin fistula. Abdom Imaging 24: 193-195, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arisawa C, Takeuchi S, Wakui M. Appendiceal carcinoma invading the urinary bladder. Int J Urol 8: 196-198, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grover AS, Mittal S, Singla P, Singh P, Kapoor W. Cystadenocarcinoma of appendix with cutaneous fistula - An unusual case presentation. Indian J Surg 67: 267-269, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tucker ON, Madhavan P, Healy V, Jeffers M, Keane FB. Unusual presentation of an appendiceal malignancy. Int Surg 91: 57-60, 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mistry R, Ananthakrishnan K, Hamid BN, Powell C, Foster GE. Appendiceal carcinoma masquerading as recurrent urinary tract infections: case report and review of literature. Urology 68: 428.e1-428.e3, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miyakura Y, Iwai H, Togashi K, et al. Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix invading the ascending colon with fistula formation: report of a case. Surg Today 37: 806-810, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Subramanya D, Grivas PD, Styler M. Appendiceal carcinoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Postgrad Med 120: 95-100, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cakmak A, Karakayali F, Bayar S, Unal E, Akyol C, Kocaoğlu H. Pseudomyxoma retroperitonei presenting with a skin fistula. Turk J Gastroenterol 20: 79-80, 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murphy JA, Matar N. An unusual case of appendiceal adenocarcinoma presenting with rectal bleeding and haematuria. Case Rep Gastroenterol 3: 265-268, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sayles M, Courtney E, Younis F, O'Donovan M, Ibrahim A, Fearnhead NS. Appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma presenting as an enterocutaneous fistula in an incisional hernia. BMJ Case Rep 2010: bcr1120092472, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vidarsdottir H, Moller PH, Benediktsdottir KR, Geirsson G. Adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Scand J Urol Nephrol 44: 354-356, 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mishin I, Ghidirim G, Vozian M. Appendiceal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with implantation metastasis to the incision scar and cutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Cancer 43: 349-353, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Desantis M, Bereder JM, Benchimol D. Vesico-appendiceal fistula revealing pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Visc Surg 151: 61-63, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang W, Wang L, Xu J, Shi S, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Combination of CT imaging and endoscopy in diagnosis of appendicovesical fistula caused by appendiceal adenocarcinoma. J Xray Sci Technol 22: 493-501, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

