Abstract
As an emerging sterilization technology, cold atmospheric plasma offers a dry, non-thermal, rapid process that is minimally damaging to a majority of substrates. However, the mechanisms by which plasma interacts with living cells are poorly understood and the plasma generation apparatuses are complex and resource-intensive. In this study, the roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), and charged particles (ions) produced by surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) plasma on prokaryotic (Listeria monocytogenes (Gram-positive)) and eukaryotic (human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC)) cellular function were evaluated. HUVEC and bacterial oxidative stress responses, the accumulation of nitrite in aqueous media, air ion density, and bacterial inactivation at various distances from SDBD actuators were measured. SDBD actuator designs were also varied in terms of electrode number and length to evaluate the cellular effects of plasma volume and power distribution. NO and ions were found to contribute minimally to the observed cellular effects, whereas ROS were found to cause rapid bacterial inactivation, induce eukaryotic and prokaryotic oxidative stress, and result in rapid oxidation of bovine muscle tissue. The results of this study underscore the dominance of ROS as the major plasma generated species responsible for cellular effects, with ions and RNS having a secondary, complimentary role.
Introduction
Cold atmospheric plasma has been heavily investigated in recent years due to its many potential benefits in the field of healthcare, mainly for applications in disinfection and sterilization1–5, wound healing6–8, and cancer treatment9–11. Various cold plasma technologies have shown effectiveness against drug-resistant bacteria and are currently being reviewed for clinical applications12–14. Additionally, this technology has been extensively investigated in different forms for multiple food decontamination applications15,16. However, many of the current designs used to generate cold plasma rely on direct plasma exposure14, consist of complex apparatuses, and require an external gas flow for distribution of plasma-generated species to treatment sites17–21. As a result, there is a strong need for an effective, inexpensive, and versatile cold plasma generation technology with a simple design for broad applications in surface decontamination and sterilization.
As previously described1,22, surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is a novel method of non-thermal plasma generation that overcomes these drawbacks: it has low power requirements, greater treatment flexibility, and an increased effective treatment range. Since SDBD plasma generation is a semi-direct method of exposure to plasma species and does not require the substrate to complete the electric circuit, potential negative effects such as burning and tissue desiccation can be mitigated. SDBD exposure has shown a dose-based differential response in eukaryotic cells23 and lethal effects on prokaryotic cells1,4,22,24. It was observed that prokaryotic cells have a lower tolerance to plasma-generated species than eukaryotic cells22,24and therefore surface decontamination of eukaryotic tissues may be possible without adverse effects on the treated tissue. SDBD, being a surface treatment, may provide an alternative for precision surface treatments in hospitals, medical facilities, and dermatological applications.
Although investigated for many years for flow control applications25–30, the effects of different SDBD design parameters on the production and concentration of plasma-generated species has not been well defined. Different types and concentrations of plasma-generated species have direct effects on the responses of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells to cold plasma treatments21,24,31–33. Thus, it is important to identify the SDBD design parameters that influence plasma-generated species production so that SDBD actuators can be optimized for specific decontamination and sterilization applications. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to evaluate the presence and concentration of ions, reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by SDBD and the influences of various design parameters on their production. More specifically, the effects of electrode length, electrode number, and the distance of treated surfaces from the electrodes were evaluated. Direct and indirect measurements were used to identify the cellular influence of these parameters and the importance of their biological effects was deduced. ROS and ions at close proximity to SDBD actuators were found to be the predominant plasma-produced species that influenced prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, it was shown that optimization of SDBD actuator design can lower the power requirements and increase treatment effectiveness.
Results and Discussion
Correlation of Nitrite Production and Power Distribution
Nitric oxide (NO) is an important intracellular and intercellular signaling molecule involved in regulation of cardiovascular, nervous, and immunological function34. NO regulates vascular tone, endothelial permeability, smooth muscle cell proliferation, platelet aggregation, and other functions34,35. It is synthesized intracellularly during the conversion of L-arginine into L-citrulline in the presence of oxygen (O2), a reaction catalyzed by nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Nitrites (NO2−) are generated readily in aqueous solutions by oxidation of NO36 by O3 or O2−. For this reason, the production of extracellular NO following exposure to cold plasma was determined by measuring the accumulation of NO2−, the stable metabolite of NO secreted into the culture medium to provide evidence of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) produced by the plasma source37,38.
To evaluate the correlation of nitrite formation with power consumption, a two-electrode configuration was used, wherein the actuator consisted of two exposed and powered electrodes with a single encapsulated ground electrode on the opposite side of the dielectric. HUVEC media (without cells) in a 6-well plate was exposed to plasma at approximately 1 cm from the actuator for a treatment time of 2 minutes. The power per unit length was varied by altering the length of the electrodes. It was observed that the nitrite concentration increased with the increase in the power per unit length (Fig. 2a). This result suggested a direct correlation of power with nitrite generation, and hence suggests that higher NO concentrations can be generated with a higher power input. These results agree with the findings of Pavlovich et al., who suggested a transition to higher NOx phase with increased power density39.
Correlation of Nitrite Production and Bacterial Inactivation
The correlation of nitrite generation and bacterial inactivation was evaluated using a five strain mixture of Listeria monocytogenes. Additionally, the effect of increased plasma volume was investigated by varying the number of electrodes between 2, 4, and 7. Since the same net power was applied to all configurations, by increasing the number of electrodes, the volume of plasma produced increased while the power per unit length decreased. All tests were carried out after sufficient drying of bacterial suspensions on glass coverslips (approximately 60 minutes in a biosafety cabinet) so the observed results were on a relatively dry surface. However, the presence of moisture and humidity on the cellular level cannot be ruled out completely and further analysis is required to quantify the effect of moisture on bacterial inactivation with plasma treatment. A higher concentration of OH radicals were observed through optical emission spectroscopy in moist environments in a previous study23.
Nitrite concentration decreased with increasing electrode numbers from 2 to 4 and remained relatively the same between 4 and 7 (Fig. 2b). The 2-electrode configuration had a power per unit length of 93.75 W/m, as compared to the 15.63 W/m in the 7 electrode configuration. Therefore, an increased electrode number increased the plasma volume, albeit at lower power per unit length and therefore a reduced nitrite concentration.
Bacterial inactivation showed an opposite trend, increasing with an increase in electrode number at the same power input (decrease in power per unit length). Inactivation of the bacterial cells inoculated on glass coverslips was observed with the 4 and 7 electrode configurations after 2 minutes of treatment. The increased bacterial inactivation associated with increased plasma volume suggests no clear correlation between nitrite production and bacterial inactivation. A lower power per unit length still produced a high reduction of L. monocytogenes, in contrast to what was observed by others40. This finding suggests that SDBD device design, in which reactive species are actively pushed to distant surfaces by the induced flow, may be a contributing factor to bacterial inactivation39,41–43. The increase in decontamination effects with increased numbers of electrodes may be a consequence of overall increase in the relative densities of plasma-produced species other than RNA as a result of increased plasma volume. The results suggest that the low power, large plasma volume regime may be a better approach for sterilization and decontamination, thus making possible the development of low power plasma devices for decontamination applications.
Correlation of Ion Density and Bacterial Inactivation
To investigate the role of ions in the plasma decontamination process, ion density was correlated with bacterial inactivation using a 3.6 cm, 4-electrode plasma actuator with treatment distances of 1, 3, 5, and 7 cm (Fig. 1). The 4-electrode configuration was selected since a substantially higher bacterial reduction was observed as compared to that measured with the 2-electrode configuration. Measurements from the air ion counter indicated that the ion densities at the treated surface were correlated with distances from the actuator, at approximately 2200 ions/cm3 at 1 cm and 400 ions/cm3 at 7 cm44. Ions are produced by the plasma process from secondary electrons near the actuator. These ions and electrons transfer energy to radicals and meta-stables, which are responsible for microbial inactivation and other cellular effects24,32,40,41,45–48. Sysolyatina et al. in their work noticed that electro physical effect of ions in corona discharges are not essential per se for bacterial inactivation but provides strong synergistic effects with other reactive agents (promoting their biochemical inactivation)41. They also reported that ROS were most efficient in bacterial inactivation41. Ozone, one of the primary meta-stable ROS produced, increased to more than 0.14 ppm within 10 seconds when plasma is generated by SDBD (data not shown).
Bacterial inactivation decreased with decreased ion concentrations as the treated surface increased in distance from 1 to 7 cm from the actuators (Fig. 3a). Alternatively, bacterial inactivation increased with increasing electrode numbers for the same power input at the same distance although the magnitude of ions produced (~103–104) was the same for the 2, 4 and 7 electrode configurations at 1 cm. Hence, two conclusions can be drawn from these data: i) increased ion density correlates with increased bacterial inactivation; ii) the increased plasma volume produced by increasing electrode numbers from 2 to 7 does not increase ion concentration to a level that it affects bacterial inactivation. Rather, other plasma-produced reactive species must be contributing to the increased bacterial inactivation observed with increased plasma volume.
Ion Accumulation in Aqueous Media
In addition to actuator distance, duration of exposure to ions is also a factor in plasma effects on cells, particularly in aqueous environments. To understand this factor, the lifespan of ions was measured in deionized (DI) water and untreated medium by observing the change in conductivity over time after different durations of plasma exposure (Fig. 3b). The conductivity in the untreated medium was significantly higher than that in DI water, which may be attributed to the presence of electrolytes and proteins in the medium. Hence, conductivity changes in the medium could not be measured. The ionic perturbations observed in DI water after plasma treatments were negligible. Untreated DI water retained a conductivity of 0 mS/cm3, even after 24 hours. The absence of change in the perturbations introduced in the conductivity of DI water post treatment showed that the conductivity created is a consequence of oxygen and nitrogen species rather than ions, which have a life span on the order of nanoseconds to milliseconds41,49. Therefore, the effects of ions in aqueous environments may be discounted as playing an important role.
Another possible explanation for these results is the generation of acidic H3O+ ions by reactions of the water molecules with H2O250. Other researchers have noted an increase in acidity and formation of nitrous (HNO2) and nitric (HNO3) acid, along with H2O2, in unbuffered water43,51. A similar decrease in pH was observed in previous work23 and was attributed to formation of HNO2 and HNO3, along with carbonic acid (H2CO3). Increased conductivity may be a result of dissociation of these acids since acidified aqueous nitrate and nitrite anions have been shown to form when water is exposed to atmospheric plasmas43,52.
No substantial increase in ionic perturbations (conductivity) with increased electrode numbers was observed, further suggesting that ions may not contribute to the cellular effects of plasma treatment but rather to the formation of nitrites and increase in the oxidative species, also contributing to increased acidity. The pH decreased from 7 to 3.6, 3.6, and 3.4 and remained constant over a period of 24 hours when exposed to plasma with the 2, 4, and 7 electrode configurations for 2 minute treatments at 1 cm, respectively. These results corroborate the theory of Kono et al. that a synergistic antimicrobial effect occurs as a result of NO2−, H2O2, and low pH52,53. ROS can also interact with NO to produce other reactive species that may contribute to the reduced pH, and accumulation of acids such as nitric acid23. In acidic environments, NO2− and O2− can also react to form peroxynitrous acid (ONOOH) and nitrous acid (HNO2)54. This is another example of how device design affects device performance, evident from the difference in trends of pH change observed here and that observed by Kojtari et al.55. A time course analysis is required for each of the electrode arrangements to ascertain the full effect on change in pH. These results suggest that in an aqueous medium the plasma-produced ions do not contribute to observed cellular effects.
Extracellular Nitrite Accumulation
To evaluate the cellular effects of RNS, HUVECs in media were treated with SDBD cold plasma with and without the presence of a water-soluble NO scavenger, cPTIO. The resulting concentration of nitrites in the most stable configuration in aqueous media, the metabolite form of NO, was then measured via the Griess assay38,56,57 (Fig. 4). One hundred µM of c-PTIO was used since this concentration was effective at mitigating the effects of both extracellular and intracellular NO with no observable effects on the cells themselves11,58. In plasma, NO2 produced from NO and ozone (O3) reacts with H2O to form NO2− and NO3− 59. Nitrite concentrations in plasma treated samples containing HUVECs without the c-PTIO scavenger were nearly 10 fold higher than in samples containing both HUVECs and the scavenger (Fig. 5a), indicating that increased nitrite concentration is due to NO conversion to nitrite. Thirty minutes after plasma exposure of samples without the scavenger, nitrite concentrations were observed to be as high as 195 µM, decreased to approximately 130 µM after one hour, and stabilized to approximately 105 µM after 24 hours. HUVEC cell-containing control samples (no plasma exposure) with and without the scavenger had negligible nitrite concentrations for all time points. These results confirm that the increased nitrite concentration was not produced solely by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in HUVECs, but rather was a result of the plasma treatment. This finding corroborates those of another study in which high HUVEC cell viability was measured after a 4 min plasma treatment23.
When evaluating nitrite concentrations in HUVEC medium devoid of cells, a similar trend was observed. Nitrite concentrations in HUVEC medium without the scavenger were highest 30 minutes after plasma exposure, with an average of 70 µM, and then decreased to18 µM over a period of 24 hours. Therefore, since essentially the same increase in nitrite concentration immediately following plasma treatment and then a rapid decrease that leveled out after 1 hour was observed in HUVEC media with and without cells, it was concluded that NO produced by the plasma did not elicit a noticeable response from the HUVECs. The increased nitrite concentration of the media with the HUVECs may have been due to the presence of the cells themselves and a higher nitrate concentration baseline when compared to the nitrite concentration in the media alone. Similar results were observed with prokaryotic P. aeruginosa as well (Fig. 6).
Intracellular Oxidative Stress Response
The cellular oxidative stress effects of ROS produced by SDBD plasma were evaluated using HUVECs in media. By adding a ROS scavenger (NAC) and a ROS indicator (carboxy-H2DCF-DA) to the media, the relative fluorescence intensity can be correlated with oxidative stress (Fig. 4). The extent of oxidative stress experienced by a cell depends on the concentration of ROS within a cell and the rate at which the ROS can be reduced. O2− and H2O2 are produced during normal cellular respiration but are rapidly and efficiently reduced by several enzymes60. Oxidative stress occurs when these enzymes are not able to reduce ROS rapidly enough, causing an increase in ROS concentration and the potential for oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins. Although O2− and H2O2 have the potential to cause oxidative damage themselves, they also serve as precursors to the more potent hydroxyl radical (OH*) through pathways such as the Fenton reaction60. OH* is the most reactive of the ROS and rapidly causes oxidative damage to cellular components.
The effect of ROS generated by plasma treatment on HUVECs was observed by using carboxy-H2DCF-DA, with and without the presence of NAC (Fig. 5b). Positive control samples without NAC, containing 200 µM H2O2 (Fig. 5c(c)), had a fluorescence intensity similar to that of the plasma treated samples without NAC (Fig. 5c(a)). Fluorescent micrographs showed the highest fluorescence intensity for the plasma treated samples without NAC (Fig. 5c(a)) and the lowest for the untreated control samples with NAC (Fig. 5c(d)). Plasma treated samples with NAC (Fig. 5C(b)) showed a lower intensity than those without, indicating that NAC was able to neutralize the plasma generated ROS and reduce the level of oxidative stress experienced by the cells. Additionally, fluorescence intensity increased over time after plasma treatment and was highest after 24 hours, indicating the occurrence of oxidative stress within the cells. No significant ROS related stress was observed in any of the untreated control samples, with or without NAC. Similar results were observed with prokaryotic P. aeruginosa as well (Fig. 7).
Taken together, these results suggest two major conclusions. First, production of a relatively high concentration of ROS by SDBD plasma was confirmed, with the relative concentration (and therefore cellular effects) negatively correlated with increased distance from the actuators. Second, ROS produced by SDBD plasma was found to cause oxidative stress in HUVECs that continued to increase after plasma treatment was stopped.
Extracellular ROS generation by SDBD plasma actuators was assessed using optical emission spectroscopy in a previous work, wherein the major oxidative species were found to be O3, OH*, NO, and O2+ 23. These ROS can serve as precursors to other ROS, such as H2O2 and HNO2, in an aqueous medium61. Several authors have attempted to validate the dominance of HNO3 and H2O2 in the plasma interaction with cells, especially in the generation of plasma activated water (PAW)51. However, the general conclusion was that these agents, alone62 or in combination, did not give the same response as observed with plasma treatment43,55,63, thus indicating a multicomponent chemical dynamic.
ROS and Plasma Effects on Bovine Muscle Tissue
The dominance of the role of ROS rather than RNS in the plasma treatment process was further confirmed by assessing the effects of plasm treatment on pathogen-inoculated bovine muscle tissue. Interestingly, negligible bacterial inactivation was observed on muscle tissue samples surface inoculated with L. monocytogenes. This observation may be partly attributed to the surface roughness and porosity of the muscle tissue, providing more shelter for the bacteria, or a shadowing effect, from the plasma generated species64. Alternatively, this observation may be a result of the high concentration of myoglobin and other components having high affinities for ROS. Pavlovich et al. observed similar results using pig skin, in which a slight reduction in E. coli concentration was observed after plasma treatment as compared to other substrates39. The presence of such compounds may reduce the concentration of ROS able to interact with and damage bacterial cells.
Although limited bacterial inactivation was observed, the texture and color of the muscle tissue noticeably changed from smooth to wrinkled and from bright red to a rustic brown. This texture and color change may be characteristic evidence of oxymyoglobin (OxyMb) oxidation to form methemoglobin (MetHb) by ROS36. The high concentration of iron in oxymyoglobin (or oxyhemoglobin) may contribute to the high affinity of ROS to oxymyoglobin65. Tang et al.66 reported a similar observation in which the addition of glutathione to bovine muscle cytosol improved oxymyoglobin redox stability. Further investigation of this observation was carried out by treating the muscle tissue samples with and without NAC, an ROS scavenger, prior to plasma treatment. Plasma treated samples with NAC showed no observable color or texture changes, whereas those without NAC exhibited the characteristic color change from bright red to rustic brown (Fig. 8). NAC produced no visibly detrimental effects on untreated muscle tissue control samples (Fig. 8(a)). These results confirm that SDBD produces a relatively high concentration of ROS, even beyond the plasma region itself, and is a major contributing factor to the cellular effects of plasma treatment. Additionally, the high affinity of myoglobin to ROS may have scavenged the plasma-produced ROS before they were able to have detrimental effects on Listeria cells on the surface of the meat, confirming the major role of ROS on bacterial inactivation. Further histological analysis of the tissue samples is required to better characterize the observed effects of cells subjected to plasma treatment.
Cell Surface Effects of SDBD Treatment
TEM of SDBD plasma-treated Listeria cells compared to untreated controls revealed noticeable morphological differences with increasing treatment times ranging from 2 to 6 min (Fig. 9). Untreated cells had distinct boundaries when clustered in groups, with multiple cells undergoing mitosis and clearly visible fimbriae under high magnification. After 2 min treatments cell surfaces were visually darker and cell boundaries appeared more ragged, less uniform, and less distinct between individual cells. Substantially more extracellular debris, visible only in treated samples, may be a result of membrane damage and cytosol leakage. Membrane and cell surface damage became increasingly more evident after 4 and 6 min treatments, evidenced by darker staining, less distinct cellular margins, and greater amounts of extracellular debris (Fig. 9).
Summary and Conclusions
A differential response to plasma treatment between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells has been observed by several researchers6,23,31, Compared to eukaryotes, prokaryotic cells are much more sensitive to oxidative stress67. A similar differential response has been observed between normally functioning eukaryotic cells and cancer cells68, attributed to the Warburg effect, by which cancer cells are damaged more readily by ROS due to their increased reliance on aerobic metabolism69,70. Based on this characteristic, a selective treatment of cancer cells among healthy mammalian cells may be possible68,71. The rate of cellular inactivation by plasma generated in air or oxygen was several times faster than when it is generated in noble gases, further corroborating the dominant role of ROS on cellular effects72. Identifying and quantifying the specific ROS produced will aid in further tuning of the system for higher precision and effective applications. Since non-thermal plasmas allow a surface treatment effect rather than a bulk effect, it will be beneficial to tune the system for etching-like capabilities, providing an exact treatment approach. Furthermore, an increased understanding of the utilization of the flow induction capabilities of SDBD for long range applications should be investigated further and be more fully characterized.
To summarize, these results provide evidence that ROS, rather than NO and ions, are the major contributors to SDBD plasma-induced bacterial inactivation and eukaryotic oxidative stress. Maximal cellular effects were observed when samples were placed in close proximity to plasma actuators, possibly the result of a synergistic effect of ROS, NO, and ions that decreased with increasing distance from the actuators, as was also observed by Kono et al.53. The observed ion density was highest immediately adjacent to the plasma region and decreased rapidly with increased distance from the actuators. In aqueous medium, ROS, NO, and ions contributed to a decrease in pH, adding to the synergistic effects. At increased distances from plasma actuators, ROS were the major plasma generated species interacting with treated cells.
Nitrites may be beneficial in higher concentrations for wound care applications such as in acidified nitrite creams for topical NO donating wound healing agents73 and surface disinfection of robust, difficult to inactivate bacterial strains74. Direct plasma exposure methods such as volumetric DBD, although sometimes more efficient at bacterial inactivation, have been observed to cause tissue damage and often provides a non-uniform treatment39. Hence, the semi-direct method of plasma exposure used in this work (SDBD) is a good alternative with capabilities of flow control to push the generated plasma species to the surface being treated. SDBD actuator designs also allow manipulation of the species being generated by changing the plasma parameters and electrode configurations, thus providing a specific desired effect (i.e. sterilization vs. wound healing). Similar studies, such as the one in the work of Lunov et al.75, provide insight into what effects different kind of changes in various parameters of a plasma generation method can produce. The selectivity and tuning capabilities offered by this technology can help in our efforts to resolve major global public health issues such as the development of bacterial antimicrobial resistance, chronic wound infections, and sterilization of a variety of both organic and inorganic surfaces. Optimized SDBD actuators are viable candidate for numerous applications in the healthcare industry, especially for sterilization and wound healing.
Materials and Methods
Plasma Actuator Arrangements
All SDBD plasma actuators were constructed as described previously23. This plasma actuator arrangement has been shown to produce reactive species and UV light. However, previous findings using optical emission spectroscopy has shown UV light production to be negligible23 so it was not evaluated in this study. Briefly, SDBD plasma actuators were constructed using 0.0254 cm thick Teflon sheets (McMaster-Carr Supply Company, USA) as a dielectric medium, to which 0.2 cm wide copper tape (McMaster-Carr Supply Company, USA) was attached asymmetrically on either side to serve as electrodes (Fig. 1). All experiments were carried out with actuators operating at 6.75 W using a high voltage, high frequency transformer (Minimax70, Information Unlimited, Amhert, NH). Different configurations of electrodes were used, as described below.
(i) To test the effects of power density on nitrite production, three different actuators were constructed with two powered electrodes on one side of the dielectric with lengths of 3.6 cm, 5.4 cm, and 11 cm. Power per unit length of the electrode was calculated for each configuration using the equation:
where the total length of plasma is measured by multiplying the number of edges on which the plasma is generated by the length of the electrodes. Accordingly, power densities per unit length of 93.75 W/m, 62.5 W/m and 30.68 W/m were observed for electrode lengths of 3.6 cm, 5.4 cm, and 11 cm, respectively.
(ii) To understand the bactericidal effects of increased electrode numbers at a constant electrode length, three actuators were prepared using 3.6 cm long electrodes on a dielectric of area 5 cm × 4 cm. The numbers of electrodes placed on the dielectric were 2, 4, and 7, with the same power input as stated above. Samples were exposed to plasma at 1 cm from the actuator for 2 min. To evaluate the effect of increased distance between the actuator and the sample, the 4-electrode configuration was used at distances of 1, 3, 5, and 7 cm from the sample.
(iii) For mammalian cell culture experiments, the actuator size had to be adjusted to fit the culture plates, as in a previous study23. In brief, two parallel electrodes of 11 cm × 0.5 cm were placed on 12.5 cm × 3 cm Teflon sheets on the side exposed to the sample being treated. A common ground electrode of 11 cm × 0.5 cm was used on the opposing side, placed asymmetrically in relation to the powered electrodes (Fig. 1). The actuator was placed 1 cm from the surface of the cell monolayer formed on the bottom of the petri dish. In accordance with previous work23, all HUVECs were treated with plasma for 4 min.
Air Ion Production by SDBD Actuators
The density of ions generated due to SDBD cold plasma actuators were measured with an air ion counter (AlphaLab, Inc., model AIC, Salt Lake City, UT), which measures separately the number of positive and negative ions per cm3 of air. This air ion meter is based on a Gerdien Tube (Gerdien Condenser) design and contains a fan that pulls air through the meter at a calibrated rate. The density of ions resulting from plasma exposure with a 4-electrode actuator was measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 cm from the actuator surface. The air ion density resulting from plasma generation was compared to the ambient air to determine the relative increase in ion density. All measurements were done in triplicate and with the fan off to prevent any bias due to induced convection. Ion density was measured once a steady state reading was observed by the air ion counter.
Bacterial Inoculation and Treatment
Five strains of Listeria monocytogenes (F6854, 12433, G3982, J0161 and, Scott A) were cultured for 24 hours at 37 °C in tryptic soy broth (TSB, Difco). After incubation, 1 mL of each culture was centrifuged at 9,000 x g for 3 minutes. Pellets were re-suspended in 1 mL of 0.1% (w/v) sterile peptone water (Difco) and combined to obtain a 5-strain mixture (5 mL total). Multiple-strain mixtures were used in this research to more closely imitate real-world populations of bacteria consisting of more than a single strain and to rule out any strain-specific responses to the plasma treatment. The mixture was then diluted 10-fold to produce the desired inoculum concentration of 107 CFU/mL, and 100 µL was uniformly distributed in 20–25 spots on sterile 2.2 cm2 glass coverslips (105 to 106 CFU/spot). Inoculated coverslips were air dried in a biosafety cabinet for approximately 60 min prior to plasma treatment. Dried bacterial cells were evaluated in this study to mitigate the effects of medium acidification when bacterial cells are treated in a suspension and allow the more short-lived ROS and RNS to interact with the cell surface rather than the medium in which the cells are suspended. Sysolyatina et al. reported composition of these secondary species is not the same as compared with primary gaseous species generated by the plasma source41, hence drying the bacteria on coverslips helped determine the effects of the primary species. The 100 µL inoculum was spread out in 20–25 spots to reduce the accumulation of layers of cells on one side of each spot as the liquid evaporates as a result of surface tension.
Inoculated coverslips were treated in triplicate for two separate experiments: (1) 1, 3, 5, and 7 cm with 4-electrode actuators for 2 min and; (2) 2, 4, and 7-electrode actuators at 1 cm for 2 min. Plasma-treated and untreated control inoculated coverslips were washed by vortexing for 30 s in 10 mL 0.1% (w/v) sterile peptone in 50 mL conical tubes. Wash fluids were 10-fold serially diluted in 0.1% peptone for enumeration, for which 100 µL of each dilution was plated in duplicate on TSA and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Bacterial inactivation due to cold plasma treatment was assessed by comparing the bacterial recovery of plasma-treated samples to untreated controls. This method was used to negate the potentially negative effects of desiccation on cell viability.
For extracellular nitrite detection and intracellular oxidative stress detection in prokaryotic cells, cryopreserved clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from canine ear swabs were used for the study. P. aeruginosa was revived on blood agar plates. Following revival, roughly 10 colonies were picked a nd mixed in 2 ml of 1x PBS. A serial dilution was made to estimate the concentration of the mixture. Under a dark environment, 50 mM DCFDA, 100 µM c-PTIO, 5 mM NAC were made. 2 mLof all these solutions were aliquot into different tubes. Roughly 10 colonies were added to all these tubes. In a 96 well plate, these reagents were added sequentially in triplicates. Negative and positive controls were established as per need.
All the readings were measured at 0 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 12 hours and 24 hours after final incubation. The concentration of P. aeruginosa used with each reagent was estimated using the Miles-Misra technique. The concentration was found to be 3–5 × 109/mL.
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Culture
HUVEC were chosen for this study since they have been previously noted to be resilient to SDBD plasma treatment and show a dose-dependent response with higher viability compared to other common eukaryotic cells23. HUVEC derived from single donors (Life Technologies) were cultured in Medium 200 phenol red free (PRF), supplemented with low serum growth supplement (LSGS, containing 2% v/v fetal bovine serum, 1 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 10 ng/mL human epidermal growth factor, 3 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor, and 10 µg/mL heparin) following the vendor’s instructions, as described previously23. HUVECs were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2/95% air, in a humidified cell culture incubator and fed with fresh medium every 36 hours. When confluent, cells were suspended with 0.025% trypsin and 0.01% EDTA in PBS and neutralized with trypsin neutralizer solution (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing calf serum as a trypsin inhibitor), centrifuged at 125 × g for 5 minutes, and re-suspended in growth medium. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue stained cells in a hemocytometer and seeded into various culture plates as required. Based on viability analysis and the minimal observed pH change of the HUVEC medium23, cells were exposed to plasma for 4 minutes at a distance of approximately 1 cm.
Electrical Conductivity of Plasma Treated Water and Media
Ten mL of water or growth medium used for HUVEC culture were treated with plasma for 2 and 4 minutes. The electrical conductivity of the treated water and growth medium was measured with a portable pH/EC/TDS meter (Milwaukee Instruments, Inc., model MW802, Rocky Mt, NC) at 30 min, 1 hr, 12 hr, and 24 hr after plasma treatment.
Extracellular Nitrite Detection in HUVEC
HUVECs were seeded into a 24 well plate at 12,000 cells per well and incubated with 500 µL medium. After 24 hours, cells were pretreated with carboxy-PTIO (100 µM), which scavenges NO stoichiometrically, and incubated for 45 minutes before they were exposed to plasma. Untreated samples with and without the NO scavenger were used as controls. Culture medium was retrieved at 30 min, 1 hour, 12 hours, and 24 hours for nitrite analysis and mixed with an equal volume of Griess Reagent (for nitrite detection) as specified by the vendor (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, USA), then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm with an Emax precision microplate reader using the software SoftMax Pro 4.3 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), using a calibration curve with a range of 0–100 µM concentrations of NaNO2.
Fresh medium was used to measure nitrite production induced by plasma to establish a baseline nitrite concentration attributable to plasma exposure to discount nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity. For measuring the effects of power density and number of electrodes, tests were conducted using 1 mL of medium in a 6-well plate and nitrite concentrations were measured 1 hour after exposure.
Extracellular Nitrite Detection in Bacterial Cells
P. aeruginosa incubated with c-PTIO for one hour was seeded to a 96 will plate in triplicates. They were then incubated at 37 °C for 5–10 minutes. Equal volume of Griess reagent obtained commercially, was added to this mixture. Following a 5-minute incubation after adding Griess reagent, the plates were measured at 490 nm using SpectraMax microplate reader and SoftMax pro 4.6.
Intracellular Oxidative Stress Detection in HUVEC
The intracellular effects of ROS produced by SDBD plasma were evaluated using HUVECs in media, but with the addition of a ROS scavenger (NAC) and a ROS indicator (carboxy-H2DCF-DA) (Fig. 4). Carboxy-H2DCF-DA is an acetylated form of fluorescin that is deacytelated by ROS, causing it to fluoresce. Thus, relative fluorescence intensity can be correlated to the relative intracellular accumulation of ROS. At the intracellular level, NAC is rapidly hydrolyzed to L-cysteine, allowing increased production of glutathione (GSH), a powerful antioxidant. In the presence of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), GSH and H2O2 react to form disulfide (GS-SG) and water76 (Fig. 4). At the extracellular level, NAC simply acts as a nucleophile, donating an electron to ROS introduced by the plasma treatment76. Five mM of NAC was used in this study since this concentration was found to provide effective cyto-protective properties while also not having toxic effects on the cells58,77.
HUVECs were seeded in four 96 well plates at a density of 7,000 cells per well and incubated overnight with 200 µL medium. NAC readily binds with all ROS, including those that contain nitrogen78, both intracellularly and extracellularly76. Four different conditions were created: (1) untreated negative control with NAC (5 mM58); (2) plasma treated cells without NAC; (3) plasma treated cells with NAC; (4) untreated positive control with H2O2 (200 µM). Intracellular ROS levels were assessed using the Image-IT LIVE Green Reactive Oxygen Species Detection Kit (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, Caboxy-H2DCF-DA was added to all cultures at 50 μM. Cells were incubated for 45 min, washed with PBS and 200 µL of media was added to each well. The media was removed at the time of exposure, with a thin layer to keep the cells hydrated as in the previous work23,79. For conditions containing NAC, media contained 500 mM of the scavenger. Fluorescence intensity was measured with a microplate reader, SpectraMAX GEMINI XS at 495/529 nm, using the software SoftMax Pro 4.3 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Fluorescence images were captured using an inverted microscope with fluorescent lamp (Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-U, Melville, NY). Intensity was measured and images taken at 30 min, 1 hour, 12 hours, and 24 hours after plasma treatment. Each plate was only exposed once to eliminate photobleaching.
Intracellular Oxidative Stress Detection in Bacterial Cells
P. aeruginosa mixed in 2 ml of 5 mM NAC was added to 96 well plates in triplicates. These plates were then incubated for 15 minutes. Following incubation, under a dark biosafety cabinet hood, equal volume of DCFDA was added. The plates were then covered and incubated for 5–10 minutes. Fluorescence was measured at 480/520 nm using SpectraMax Microplate reader and software SoftMax pro 4.6.
Evaluation of ROS and Plasma Effects on Bovine Muscle Tissue
Two separate sets of experiments were designed to evaluate the role of plasma generated ROS on muscle tissue. First, the tissue was inoculated with pathogens (5 strain cocktail of Listeria monocytogenes) and exposed to plasma for 4 minutes with a 4 electrode configuration at 1 cm from the sample. In the second experiment, the muscle tissue was coated with 1 ml of 5 mM NAC prepared in PBS to observe if the effects of plasma were due predominately to ROS. Samples that did not have NAC were coated with PBS alone to prevent desiccation. Treatment conditions were the same as those for the first experiment.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to visualize untreated control and plasma-treated Listeria innocua (a non-pathogenic species with similar cell morphology to Listeria monocytogenes) cells to evaluate the morphological effects of the plasma treatment. A suspension of approximately 107 CFU/mL of Listeria cells, prepared as described above, were spotted onto carbon-backed gold TEM grids placed onto sterile glass coverslips, air-dried for 60 minutes, and treated with SDBD plasma actuators for 2, 4, and 6 minutes at a distance of 1 cm, as described above. The cells on untreated control and treated TEM grids were then negative stained with phosphotungstic acid and visualized with a JEOL JEM-2100 scanning transmission electron microscope system.
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were conducted in triplicate and reported values are represented as mean ± SD. Significant difference between two groups was analyzed using ANOVA with 95% confidence interval. Differences in the results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work was provided by Plasma Bionics LLC, and Edward Joullian Endowment.
Author Contributions
K. Pai and S.V. Madihally designed the experimental approach, created figures, and wrote the manuscript. C. Timmons and K.D. Roehm performed experiments relevant to HUVECs and L. monocytogenes, and helped write the manuscript. A. Ngo, S.S. Narayanan and A. Ramachandran performed P. aeruginosa experiments, and helped write the manuscript. J.D. Jacob and L.M. Ma contributed conceptually to the work and reviewed the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Markou N, et al. Intravenous colistin in the treatment of sepsis from multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli in critically ill patients. Critical Care. 2003;7:R78. doi: 10.1186/cc2358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cushnie TPT, Cushnie B, Lamb AJ. Alkaloids: An overview of their antibacterial, antibiotic-enhancing and antivirulence activities. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2014;44:377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pai, K. & Jacob, J. In in Proc. 51st AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meeting (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013).
- 4.Maisch T, et al. Decolonisation of MRSA, S. aureus and E. coli by cold-atmospheric plasma using a porcine skin model in vitro. PloS one. 2012;7:e34610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Machala Z, Chládeková L, Pelach M. Plasma agents in bio-decontamination by dc discharges in atmospheric air. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2010;43:222001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/22/222001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brun P, et al. Disinfection of ocular cells and tissues by atmospheric-pressure cold plasma. PloS one. 2012;7:e33245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sung S-J, et al. Sterilization effect of atmospheric pressure non-thermal air plasma on dental instruments. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2013;5:2–8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Julák J, Scholtz V. Decontamination of human skin by low-temperature plasma produced by cometary discharge. Clinical Plasma Medicine. 2013;1:31–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cpme.2013.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Isbary G, et al. Successful and safe use of 2 min cold atmospheric argon plasma in chronic wounds: results of a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;167:404–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10923.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ermolaeva, S. A. et al. Comparative Study of Three Nonthermal Plasma Sources against Causative Agents of Nosocomial Infections. Plasma Medicine 2 (2012).
- 11.Ahn Hak Jun, Kim Kang Il, Hoan Nguyen Ngoc, Kim Churl Ho, Moon Eunpyo, Choi Kyeong Sook, Yang Sang Sik, Lee Jong-Soo. Targeting Cancer Cells with Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Generated by Atmospheric-Pressure Air Plasma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee H, et al. Degradation of adhesion molecules of G361 melanoma cells by a non-thermal atmospheric pressure microplasma. New J. Phys. 2009;11:115026. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/115026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Volotskova O, Hawley TS, Stepp MA, Keidar M. Targeting the cancer cell cycle by cold atmospheric plasma. Scientific Reports. 2012;2:636. doi: 10.1038/srep00636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Daeschlein, G. et al. Cold plasma–a new antimicrobial treatment tool against multidrug resistant pathogens. Worldwide Research Efforts in the Fighting Against Microbial Pathogens–From Basic Research to Technological Developments. Ed. Mendez-Vilas. Brown Walker Press Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 110–113 (2013).
- 15.Kvam E, Davis B, Mondello F, Garner AL. Nonthermal atmospheric plasma rapidly disinfects multidrug-resistant microbes by inducing cell surface damage. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2012;56:2028–2036. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05642-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isbary G, et al. Non-thermal plasma—More than five years of clinical experience. Clinical Plasma Medicine. 2013;1:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpme.2012.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niemira BA. Cold plasma decontamination of foods*. Annual review of food science and technology. 2012;3:125–142. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Misra NN, et al. In-package atmospheric pressure cold plasma treatment of strawberries. Journal of Food Engineering. 2014;125:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stoffels E, Flikweert A, Stoffels W, Kroesen G. Plasma needle: a non-destructive atmospheric plasma source for fine surface treatment of (bio) materials. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2002;11:383. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/11/4/304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rød SK, Hansen F, Leipold F, Knøchel S. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of ready-to-eat meat: Inactivation of Listeria innocua and changes in product quality. Food microbiology. 2012;30:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Isbary G, et al. Cold atmospheric argon plasma treatment may accelerate wound healing in chronic wounds: Results of an open retrospective randomized controlled study in vivo. Clinical Plasma Medicine. 2013;1:25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cpme.2013.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fröhling A, et al. Indirect plasma treatment of fresh pork: Decontamination efficiency and effects on quality attributes. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2012;16:381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2012.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pai Kedar K., Singarapu Kumar, Jacob Jamey D., Madihally Sundararajan V. Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2015;12(7):666–677. doi: 10.1002/ppap.201400134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fridman G, et al. Applied plasma medicine. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2008;5:503–533. doi: 10.1002/ppap.200700154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Forte M, Leger L, Pons J, Moreau E, Touchard G. Plasma actuators for airflow control: measurement of the non-stationary induced flow velocity. Journal of Electrostatics. 2005;63:929–936. doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2005.03.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Forte M, et al. Optimization of a dielectric barrier discharge actuator by stationary and non-stationary measurements of the induced flow velocity: application to airflow control. Exp Fluids. 2007;43:917–928. doi: 10.1007/s00348-007-0362-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Font GI. Boundary layer control with atmospheric plasma discharges. AIAA journal. 2006;44:1572–1578. doi: 10.2514/1.18542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Font, G., Enloe, C. & McLaughlin, T. E. Effect of volumetric momentum addition on the total force production of a plasma actuator. AIAA paper4285 (2009).
- 29.Enloe C, et al. Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actuator: plasma morphology. AIAA journal. 2004;42:589–594. doi: 10.2514/1.2305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boeuf J, Lagmich Y, Unfer T, Callegari T, Pitchford L. Electrohydrodynamic force in dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007;40:652. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/3/S03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wende K, Landsberg K, Lindequist U, Weltmann K-D, von Woedtke T. Distinctive activity of a nonthermal atmospheric-pressure plasma jet on eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells in a cocultivation approach of keratinocytes and microorganisms. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2010;38:2479–2485. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2052835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haertel, B. et al. Differential Influence of Components Resulting from Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma on Integrin Expression of Human HaCaT Keratinocytes. Bio Med Res. Int2013 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Yonson S, Coulombe S, Leveille V, Leask R. Cell treatment and surface functionalization using a miniature atmospheric pressure glow discharge plasma torch. J.Phys.D:Appl. Phys. 2006;39:3508. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/39/16/S08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Aktan F. iNOS-mediated nitric oxide production and its regulation. Life sciences. 2004;75:639–653. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kojda G, Harrison D. Interactions between NO and reactive oxygen species: pathophysiological importance in atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes and heart failure. Cardiovascular research. 1999;43:652–671. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ignarro LJ. Biosynthesis and metabolism of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 1990;30:535–560. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.30.040190.002535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Amano F, Noda T. Improved detection of nitric oxide radical (NO•) production in an activated macrophage culture with a radical scavenger, carboxy PTIO, and Griess reagent. FEBS Letters. 1995;368:425–428. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00700-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sherman MP, Aeberhard EE, Wong VZ, Griscavage JM, Ignarro LJ. Pyrrolidine Dithiocarbamate Inhibits Induction of Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity in Rat Alveolar Macrophages. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1993;191:1301–1308. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pavlovich MJ, Chen Z, Sakiyama Y, Clark DS, Graves DB. Effect of Discharge Parameters and Surface Characteristics on Ambient-Gas Plasma Disinfection. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2013;10:69–76. doi: 10.1002/ppap.201200073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pavlovich MJ, Clark DS, Graves DB. Quantification of air plasma chemistry for surface disinfection. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2014;23:065036. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/065036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sysolyatina E, et al. Role of the charged particles in bacteria inactivation by plasma of a positive and negative corona in ambient air. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2014;11:315–334. doi: 10.1002/ppap.201300041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schwabedissen A, Łaciński P, Chen X, Engemann J. PlasmaLabel–a new method to disinfect goods inside a closed package using dielectric barrier discharges. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 2007;47:551–558. doi: 10.1002/ctpp.200710071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Oehmigen K, et al. The role of acidification for antimicrobial activity of atmospheric pressure plasma in liquids. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2010;7:250–257. doi: 10.1002/ppap.200900077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Likhanskii A, Shneider M, Macheret S, Miles R. AIAA Paper. 2006. Modeling of interaction between weakly ionized near-surface plasmas and gas flow; p. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ying-Hong L, et al. Optical emission spectroscopy investigation of a surface dielectric barrier discharge plasma aerodynamic actuator. Chinese Phys. Lett. 2008;25:4068. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/25/11/063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gaunt LF, Higgins SC, Hughes JF. Interaction of air ions and bactericidal vapours to control micro-organisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2005;99:1324–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fridman G, et al. Comparison of direct and indirect effects of non‐thermal atmospheric‐pressure plasma on bacteria. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2007;4:370–375. doi: 10.1002/ppap.200600217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Capitelli, M., Ferreira, C., Gordiets, B. & Osipov, A. Plasma Kinetics in Atmospheric Gases, 2000, Berlin Springer, ISBN 978-3-662-04158-1”.
- 49.Sysolyatina EV, et al. Experimental Evidences on Synergy of Gas Discharge Agents in Bactericidal Activity of Nonthermal. Plasma. 2013;3:137–152. doi: 10.1615/PlasmaMed.2014008194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chih Wei C, How-Ming L, Moo Been C. Inactivation of Aquatic Microorganisms by Low-Frequency AC Discharges. Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on. 2008;36:215–219. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2007.913928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Traylor MJ, et al. Long-term antibacterial efficacy of air plasma-activated water. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2011;44:472001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/44/47/472001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Naïtali M, Kamgang-Youbi G, Herry J-M, Bellon-Fontaine M-N, Brisset J-L. Combined effects of long-living chemical species during microbial inactivation using atmospheric plasma-treated water. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2010;76:7662–7664. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01615-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kono Y, Shibata H, Adachi K, Tanaka K. Lactate-dependent killing of Escherichia coli by nitrite plus hydrogen-peroxide: A possible role of nitrogen dioxide. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1994;311:153–159. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1994.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Graves DB. The emerging role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in redox biology and some implications for plasma applications to medicine and biology. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2012;45:263001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/26/263001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kojtari A, Ercan U, Smith J, Friedman G, Sensenig R. Chemistry for antimicrobial properties of water treated with non-equilibrium plasma. J. Nanomed. Biotherapeutic Discovery. 2013;4:120. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sun J, Zhang X, Broderick M, Fein H. Measurement of nitric oxide production in biological systems by using Griess reaction assay. Sensors. 2003;3:276–284. doi: 10.3390/s30800276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wimalawansa SJ. Nitric oxide and bone. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1192:391–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ma Y, et al. Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma preferentially induces apoptosis in p53-mutated cancer cells by activating ROS stress-response pathways. PloS one. 2014;9:e91947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Arjunan, K. P. Plasma Produced Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Angiogenesis, Drexel University (2011).
- 60.Imlay JA. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 2003;57:395–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lukes P, Dolezalova E, Sisrova I, Clupek M. Aqueous-phase chemistry and bactericidal effects from an air discharge plasma in contact with water: evidence for the formation of peroxynitrite through a pseudo-second-order post-discharge reaction of H2O2 and HNO2. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2014;23:015019. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/23/1/015019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vandamme M, et al. ROS implication in a new antitumor strategy based on non‐thermal plasma. International Journal of Cancer. 2012;130:2185–2194. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ercan UK, et al. Nonequilibrium Plasma‐Activated Antimicrobial Solutions are Broad‐Spectrum and Retain their Efficacies for Extended Period of Time. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2013;10:544–555. doi: 10.1002/ppap.201200104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kholodnykh AI, Petrova IY, Larin KV, Motamedi M, Esenaliev RO. Precision of measurement of tissue optical properties with optical coherence tomography. Appl. Opt. 2003;42:3027–3037. doi: 10.1364/AO.42.003027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ignarro LJ, Jon MF, Griscavage JM, Rogers NE, Byrns RE. Oxidation of Nitric Oxide in Aqueous Solution to Nitrite but not Nitrate: Comparison with Enzymatically Formed Nitric Oxide From L-Arginine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90:8103–8107. doi: 10.2307/2362973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tang J, Faustman C, Lee S, Hoagland TA. Effect of Glutathione on Oxymyoglobin Oxidation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003;51:1691–1695. doi: 10.1021/jf025924f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stoffels E, Sakiyama Y, Graves DB. Cold Atmospheric Plasma: Charged Species and Their Interactions With Cells and Tissues. Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on. 2008;36:1441–1457. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2008.2001084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Siu Alan, Volotskova Olga, Cheng Xiaoqian, Khalsa Siri S., Bian Ka, Murad Ferid, Keidar Michael, Sherman Jonathan H. Differential Effects of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in the Treatment of Malignant Glioma. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0126313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Engel RH, Evens AM. Oxidative stress and apoptosis: a new treatment paradigm in cancer. Frontiers in bioscience: a journal and virtual library. 2005;11:300–312. doi: 10.2741/1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Heinlin J, et al. Plasma applications in medicine with a special focus on dermatology. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2011;25:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Laroussi M, Leipold F. Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and UV radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004;233:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2003.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Weller R, Finnen MJ. The effects of topical treatment with acidified nitrite on wound healing in normal and diabetic mice. Nitric Oxide. 2006;15:395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wullt M, Odenholt I, Walder M. Activity of three disinfectants and acidified nitrite against Clostridium difficile spores. Infection Control. 2003;24:765–768. doi: 10.1086/502129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lunov O, et al. “The interplay between biological and physical scenarios of bacterial death induced by non-thermal plasma. Biomaterials. 2016;82:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.De Vries N, De Flora S. N‐acetyl‐l‐cysteine. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 1993;53:270–277. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240531040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lunov, O. et al. Cell death induced by ozone and various non-thermal plasmas: therapeutic perspectives and limitations. Scientific reports4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 78.Zafarullah M, Li W, Sylvester J, Ahmad M. Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS. 2003;60:6–20. doi: 10.1007/s000180300001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Stoffels E, Kieft I, Sladek R. Superficial treatment of mammalian cells using plasma needle. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2003;36:2908. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/36/23/007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]