Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2018 Nov 6;9:1502. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01502

Drug Transport at the Brain and Endothelial Dysfunction in Preeclampsia: Implications and Perspectives

Pablo Torres-Vergara 1,2,*, Carlos Escudero 2,3,4, Jeffrey Penny 5
PMCID: PMC6232255  PMID: 30459636

Abstract

Transport of drugs across biological barriers has been a subject of study for decades. The discovery and characterization of proteins that confer the barrier properties of endothelia and epithelia, including tight junction proteins and membrane transporters belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and Solute Carrier (SLC) families, represented a significant step forward into understanding the mechanisms that govern drug disposition. Subsequently, numerous studies, including both pre-clinical approaches and clinical investigations, have been carried out to determine the influence of physiological and pathological states on drug disposition. Importantly, there has been increasing interest in gaining a better understanding of drug disposition during pregnancy, since epidemiological and clinical studies have demonstrated that the use of medications by pregnant women is significant and this condition embodies a series of significant anatomical and physiological modifications, particularly at excretory organs and barrier sites (e.g., placenta, breast) expressing transporter proteins which influence pharmacokinetics. Currently, most of the research in this field has focused on the expression profiling of transporter proteins in trophoblasts and endothelial cells of the placenta, regulation of drug-resistance mechanisms in disease states and pharmacokinetic studies. However, little attention has been placed on the influence that the cerebrovascular dysfunction present in pregnancy-related disorders, such as preeclampsia, might exert on drug disposition in the mother’s brain. This issue is particularly important since recent findings have demonstrated that preeclamptic women suffer from long-term alterations in the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In this review we aim to analyze the available evidence regarding the influence of pregnancy on the expression of transporters and TJ proteins in brain endothelial cells, as well the mechanisms that govern the pathophysiological alterations in the BBB of women who experience preeclampsia. Future research efforts should be focused not only on achieving a better understanding of the influence of preeclampsia-associated endothelial dysfunction on drug disposition, but also in optimizing the pharmacological treatments of women suffering pregnancy-related disorders, its comorbidities and to develop new therapies aiming to restore the integrity of the BBB.

Keywords: blood-brain barrier, ABC transporters, SLC transporters, tight junction proteins, endothelial dysfunction, preeclampsia, eclampsia, brain alterations

Introduction

Worldwide, there has been an increase in the number of prescribed and over-the-counter medications taken by pregnant women (Mitchell et al., 2011; Beyene and Beza, 2018; Navaro et al., 2018). In Latin America, the true extent of the use of therapeutic drugs among pregnant women is not well characterized, but in countries such as Uruguay, 96% of pregnant women take medications and 78% use two or more (Viroga et al., 2013). A prospective cohort study conducted in Brazilian, Argentinian and Peruvian populations showed that immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women exhibit a better adherence to anti-HIV therapy when compared to post-partum (Kreitchmann et al., 2012). The above-mentioned statistics are significant since pregnancy is a physiological condition associated with anatomical and physiological modifications capable of influencing the disposition of drugs, including increased blood volume, enhanced basal metabolism, and modified hormone levels, among others.

Treatment of chronic diseases within pregnancy carries a risk for both the mother and fetus, as the administered drug could cross the placenta and reach the fetus circulation, with deleterious consequences (Jentink et al., 2010; Tomson et al., 2018). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out in animal models and human suggest that exposure to drugs is reduced in pregnancy since there is an increase in both the renal glomerular filtration rate (thereby increasing renal elimination) and hepatic metabolism mediated by isoforms of cytochrome P450 enzymes and uridine 5′-phosphate glucuronosyltransferases (Pariente et al., 2016; Koren and Pariente, 2018). Furthermore, the expression and activity of transporters involved in drug disposition appears to be modified in excretory organs (Hebert et al., 2008) in a similar fashion to that observed with metabolizing enzymes.

Pregnant women suffering from psychiatric disorders and other central nervous system (CNS) diseases often require pharmacotherapy to stabilize their symptoms, which are likely to continue after labor due to their chronic nature. Clinical studies of pregnant women receiving antiepileptic and antidepressive pharmacotherapy demonstrated that the reduced drug exposure, due to increased clearance, is associated with an increase in the seizure rate (Reisinger et al., 2013) and decreased plasma levels of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, respectively (Westin et al., 2017). These outcomes clearly demonstrate that pregnancy could have a negative impact on the clinical effect of these drugs.

Furthermore, women under pharmacological treatment for epilepsy (Borthen, 2015) or depression (Palmsten et al., 2012) have a higher risk of suffering complications derived from pathophysiological alterations associated with pregnancy, such as preeclampsia. This pathological condition, that is present in 2–8% of all pregnancies (Duley, 2009), is a disorder characterized by hypertension and proteinuria after the twentieth gestational week, which may evolve to vasogenic edema, eclampsia (seizures) and cerebrovascular stroke if not properly controlled (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013; Cipolla, 2013; Hammer and Cipolla, 2015). It is also reported that 75% of maternal deaths due to preeclampsia are related to cerebrovascular complications including eclampsia, intracranial hemorrhage, and edema (Zeeman, 2009).

Preeclampsia is associated with impaired systemic endothelial function (Roberts et al., 1989) and, in the brain of preeclamptic women, this endothelial dysfunction presents in the form of impaired integrity of the BBB (Bergman et al., 2018), which is apparently maintained even post-partum (Bergman et al., 2016). The influence of endothelial dysfunction on drug disposition in the brain has been studied in disease states, including stroke (Huang et al., 2017) however there is a lack of studies investigating the effect of endothelial dysfunction on brain drug disposition in pregnancy-related disorders. The latter issue is extremely important and needs to be addressed since preeclamptic women may need to receive medications to control symptoms within pregnancy, and/or at some point post-partum, particularly for treatment of chronic conditions, e.g., epilepsy, depression and HIV-infection. Furthermore, it is likely that women with brain endothelial dysfunction could experience increased exposure to the effects of endogenous factors and potentially harmful xenobiotics.

While the function of the BBB and transport of molecules across brain endothelial cells (BECs) has been extensively studied in non-pregnant populations, much less is known about BBB physiology during pregnancy and pregnancy-related disorders. Therefore, this review will summarize the findings related to the effect of pregnancy and preeclampsia on the expression and activity of proteins involved in the transport of drugs at the BBB.

Overview of the Blood-Brain Barrier

The BBB (Figure 1A) is a highly restrictive and specialized neurovascular network comprised of BECs, a basal membrane composed on collagen, fibronectin and laminin, pericytes, neurons and glial cells (Abbott, 2013; Daneman and Prat, 2015). In essence, the BBB isolates the brain parenchyma from the systemic circulation, regulating the supply of nutrients, controlling the bidirectional transport of endogenous mediators and protecting the CNS from exposure to harmful compounds, i.e., xenobiotics and metabolites.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Structure of the blood-brain barrier. The BBB is a neurovascular unit comprised of endothelial cells, a basal membrane, pericytes, astrocytes and neurons (A). Brain endothelial cells (BECs) express ABC/SLC transporters and high levels of Tight Junction (TJ) proteins that confer the barrier properties of the BBB (B). Figure adapted from Abbott et al. (2010) and O’Brien et al. (2012) with permission from their publishers.

Unlike other vascular beds, the endothelial cells of the BBB express a unique phenotype (Figure 1B) with higher levels of expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins, membrane transporters belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and Solute Carrier families (SLC), and metabolizing enzymes (Decleves et al., 2011; Shawahna et al., 2011; Daneman and Prat, 2015; Liao et al., 2017).

Findings of in vitro and animal models have consistently demonstrated that the transport of molecules across the BBB is strongly regulated by membrane transporters and TJ proteins (Cecchelli et al., 1999; Cantrill et al., 2012; Helms et al., 2016). More recently, the use of imaging techniques and probes have allowed the in vivo analysis of transporter functionality, e.g., P-glycoprotein (P-GP) activity at the BBB in both healthy (Bauer et al., 2015) and disease states (Shin et al., 2016).

Overview of Tight Junction Proteins in Brain Endothelial Cells

The paracellular transport of molecules at the BBB is highly selective, and this feature is associated with the expression of high levels of TJ proteins. These proteins act as a biological adhesive, anchoring together adjacent BECs via transmembrane proteins attached to intracellular scaffolding proteins (Haseloff et al., 2015).

The transmembrane proteins occludin, claudins and Junctional Adhesion Molecules (JAMs) form complex strands that interact between cells, reducing paracellular diffusion (Haseloff et al., 2015; Keaney and Campbell, 2015). However, in order to maintain this restrictiveness, TJs are linked to the cytoplasmic zonula occludens (ZO) proteins that provide a structural bridge to the actin cytoskeleton. In zones where there is contact between three BECs, the TJ protein tricellulin (MARVELD2) plays a pivotal role in modulating paracellular permeability by reducing the passage of large molecules (Reinhold and Rittner, 2017).

Since the discovery that the permeability of the BBB could be regulated through reversible disruption of TJs, this principle has served as an approach for the delivery of therapeutics that would not cross this barrier by conventional means, e.g., passive diffusion, carrier-mediated transport (Dithmer et al., 2017; Sol et al., 2017).

Overview of Transporters Involved in Brain Drug Disposition

Data from in vitro and animal models have helped establish which membrane transporters impact brain drug disposition. Furthermore, the International Transporter Consortium et al. (2010) has published and updated recommendations (Hillgren et al., 2013) for decision-making processes related to drug-transporter interactions that could be translated to clinical settings. In this regard, the ABC transporters P-glycoprotein (P-GP; Cordon-Cardo et al., 1989), Multidrug Resistance-associated Proteins (MRPs) MRP4 and MRP5 (Huai-Yun et al., 1998; Seetharaman et al., 1998), Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP; Eisenblatter and Galla, 2002; Eisenblatter et al., 2003), and the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides (OATPs) OATP1A2 and OATP2B1 SLC transporters (Roth et al., 2012), are considered the most clinically important transporters within the BBB. Although there is evidence (from pre-clinical models) that other SLC transporters expressed in the BBB, including members of the Monocarboxylate Transporter (MCT; Lee and Kang, 2016), Organic Anion Transporter (OAT) subfamilies (Hosoya and Tachikawa, 2011) are involved in the uptake of drugs, this review will exclusively focus on the transporter proteins expressed in human BECs. The characteristics of these protein families in human BECs are briefly summarized in Table 1 and the following section.

Table 1.

Human BEC ABC and SLC transporters involved in drug disposition.

Transporter Gene Molecular weight (kDa) Detected at protein level Localization and function References
ABC
P-GP ABCB1 170 Yes Luminal/Efflux Dauchy et al., 2009; Shawahna et al., 2011; Uchida et al., 2011
BCRP ABCG2 70 (Monomer) Yes Luminal/Efflux Eisenblatter et al., 2003; Dauchy et al., 2009; Shawahna et al., 2011; Uchida et al., 2011
MRPs ABCC4 170 Yes Luminal/Efflux Nies et al., 2004; Shawahna et al., 2011
ABCC5 160 Yes
SLC
OATP1A2 SLC21A3 ≈70 Yes Luminal/Uptake Lee et al., 2005; Roth et al., 2012
OATP2B1 SLC21A9 ≈77 Yes Luminal/Uptake Bronger et al., 2005; Roth et al., 2012

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters

P-glycoprotein is a 170 kDa efflux transporter encoded by the ABCB1 gene in human and the abcb1a/abcb1b genes in rodent. This protein is located at the luminal side of BECs and is described as a phenotypical marker (Sugawara et al., 1990; Dauchy et al., 2008; Cantrill et al., 2012). P-GP exhibits a broad substrate specificity that includes anticancer drugs (Mealey and Fidel, 2015), antidepressant drugs (O’Brien et al., 2012), antiepileptic drugs (Stepien et al., 2012), cardiotonic drugs (Ledwitch et al., 2016), HIV protease inhibitors (Liu et al., 2017) and immunosuppressants (Picchianti-Diamanti et al., 2014) among others. This characteristic implies the transporter has a predominant role in regulation the disposition of xenobiotics, including therapeutic drugs, thereby acting as a mechanism of detoxification and drug resistance. Some studies have also proposed a role for P-GP in the transport of endogenous mediators including steroids, bilirubin (Cascorbi, 2011) and amyloid-β, the peptide responsible of the formation of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease (Zhong et al., 2016).

The BCRP is an ABC transporter encoded by the ABCG2 gene in human and abcg2 gene in rodent, and is expressed at the luminal domain of BBB endothelial cells (Eisenblatter et al., 2003). BCRP is a monomeric protein (70 kDa) that requires the formation of at least a homodimer (and can even form homotetramers) to be functionally active (Ni et al., 2010). There is significant overlap in the substrate specificity of P-GP and BCRP and, like P-GP, BCRP can significantly influence drug transport in the body (Poguntke et al., 2010). In human BECs, BCRP is expressed at higher levels than P-GP (Shawahna et al., 2011; Uchida et al., 2011), but its overall contribution to the transport of substrates is less well understood than P-GP. As well as transporting drug substrates, BCRP also participates in transport of hormones (and conjugated metabolites) (Grube et al., 2018) and urate, a product of purine metabolism whose accumulation causes gout (Woodward et al., 2009; Fujita and Ichida, 2018).

The MRP transporters are encoded by the ABCC class of genes in human and abcc genes in rodents. MRPs mediate the transport of a diverse array of drugs and endogenous molecules including hormones, prostaglandins, leukotrienes and their conjugates (glucuronides, sulfates, and glutathione) (Zhou et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2015; Bloise et al., 2016). Members of the MRP family are not as highly expressed in BECs as P-GP and BCRP in human BECs, but the findings of proteomic (Shawahna et al., 2011; Uchida et al., 2011) and transcriptomic (Warren et al., 2009) analyses have demonstrated that MRP4, an isoform located at the luminal side, is expressed at detectable levels in human BECs. Luminal expression of MRP5 in human BECs has also been confirmed by means of fluorescent immunohistochemistry (Nies et al., 2004).

Solute Carrier Transporters

The OATPs, a group of SLC transporters belonging to the SLCO subfamily, are ubiquitously expressed throughout the body, and at the human BBB, luminal expression of OATP1A2 (Lee et al., 2005) and OATP2B1 (Bronger et al., 2005), has been reported. OATPs mediate the uptake and efflux of endogenous and exogenous molecules, which tend to possess amphiphilic characteristics (Roth et al., 2012) and substrates include prostaglandins, steroid and thyroid hormone conjugates (Grube et al., 2018), bile acids and therapeutic drugs (Kalliokoski and Niemi, 2009; Roth et al., 2012).

Expression and Functionality of Blood-Brain Barrier Tight Junctions Proteins and Drug Transporters in Pregnancy

During normal pregnancy there is an increase in blood levels of several endogenous mediators including hormones and their metabolites, pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, matrix metalloproteinases and growth factors (Chavan et al., 2017; Chen and Khalil, 2017). For example, clinical studies report that pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-6(IL-6) and markers of cyclooxygenase-2 activity were increased in healthy women, suggesting that pregnancy is characterized by a mild, sub-clinical systemic inflammatory state (Palm et al., 2013; Danielsen et al., 2014). Under this physiological pro-inflammatory condition, expression and functionality of BBB TJ proteins and ABC/SLC transporters involved in drug disposition could be modified as is observed in other conditions (Keaney and Campbell, 2015; Qosa et al., 2015). Although little is known of the influence of pregnancy on the expression of BBB transporters and TJ proteins, recent studies are addressing this issue.

Tight Junction Proteins and Pregnancy

The influence of pregnancy on the integrity of TJs has primarily been studied in endothelial cells of the placenta (Marzioni et al., 2001; Ahn et al., 2015), and to date, we are not aware of any studies reporting the effects of a healthy pregnancy on the expression of TJ proteins in the maternal BBB. During normal pregnancy, high plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenic mediator that increases BBB permeability through changes in the expression of TJ proteins (Lafuente et al., 2006) including claudin-5 and occludin (Argaw et al., 2012), have been reported (Evans et al., 1998). However, despite elevated plasma levels of VEGF, the permeability of the BBB remains unaltered in normal pregnancy (Cipolla, 2013). Indeed, studies have shown that the serum collected during late pregnancy attenuates the effects of VEGF on permeability of cerebral veins isolated from non-pregnant rats and rats in late-pregnancy (Schreurs et al., 2012). The authors attributed this outcome to the fact that, in late pregnancy, high plasma levels of soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), a splice variant of the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) lacking activity, counteracts the effects of VEGF (Cipolla, 2013).

Membrane Transporters

Current evidence suggests that expression levels of ABC transporters within the maternal BBB vary throughout pregnancy, although this outcome has only been demonstrated in animal models. Studies report the expression of rodent P-gp and mrp1 in the BBB of pregnant mice is higher at mid-gestation and decreases in late-gestation (Coles et al., 2009), whilst positron emission tomography (PET) studies conducted on macaques (Chung et al., 2010) report that P-GP activity increased from mid-gestation to late-gestation, as evidenced by reduced accumulation of the radiolabelled P-GP substrate 11C-verapamil. However, the latter study did not confirm if this effect was a result of increased P-GP expression. No studies to date have reported the influence of pregnancy on the expression of SLC transporters in the maternal BBB, although it has been demonstrated expression of rodent Oatp1a4 (a rodent isoform that shows a high homology with human OATP1A2) in the BBB of the newborn increases with maturation (Harati et al., 2013).

ATP-binding cassette and SLC transporters govern movement of a whole array of endogenous and exogenous molecules through endothelial cells of the BBB. Consequently, this transcellular passage of substances may be significantly affected by pregnancy-dependent changes in transporter expression. However, despite the potential implications of modification of the barrier properties of the maternal BBB, to date, the precise mechanisms by which pregnancy could influence the expression of the above transporters are unclear and are only relatively recently being investigated.

A recent study reported that acute exposure of isolated hippocampal rat brain capillaries to serum obtained from pregnant rats reduced P-GP activity (Johnson et al., 2018). The authors hypothesized that this inhibition of P-GP, mediated by high levels of circulating serum factors, was associated with the increased incidence of seizures in normal pregnant rats. However, this study did not identify the molecules responsible for reduced P-GP activity. Furthermore, the findings are in contrast to those reported in studies investigating the relationship between seizures and P-GP activity, which suggest glutamate-mediated induction of cyclooxygenase-2 activity is responsible for the up-regulation of P-GP expression and activity in BECs in animal models of epilepsy (Zibell et al., 2009; van Vliet et al., 2010) and in capillaries isolated from human brains (Avemary et al., 2013). These findings are particularly important since studies suggest that in normal pregnancies and in preeclampsia, the cerebral levels of glutamate are reduced when compared to non-pregnant women (Nelander et al., 2018).

The specific effects of endogenous factors on the expression and activity of ABC transporters during pregnancy have been studied more in-depth on the developing fetal BBB than in the maternal BBB. Studies have reported that primary cultures of guinea pig BECs, obtained from late-gestational fetuses and postnatal pups, are highly responsive to the effects of glucocorticoids and pro-inflammatory cytokines, with hydrocortisone and dexamethasone (Iqbal et al., 2011) increasing P-gp activity and IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα (Iqbal et al., 2012) decreasing P-gp activity. However, despite the opposing effects exerted by glucocorticoids and cytokines on P-gp expression and activity, a later report demonstrated that co-treatment with the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone, apart from increasing the expression of the transporter, enhanced the inhibitory actions of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα on P-GP activity (Iqbal et al., 2016). The authors suggested that this enhancement of cytokine inhibitory actions is the result of a dexamethasone-mediated increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines receptors.

Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ), a protein found at high levels in plasma during pregnancy (Forbes and Westwood, 2010), has also been reported to regulate the expression of P-GP in BECs, and Baello et al. (2016), have reported TGFβ-mediated up-regulation of P-GP expression and activity, through activation of the ALK1 and ALK5 signaling pathways, in BECs isolated from male fetuses and postnatal guinea pig pups.

Endothelial Dysfunction at the Brain in Pregnancy-Related Disorders

Pregnancy alone can be considered as an inflammatory (but not pathological) state. One hallmark of pregnancy-related disorders, including preeclampsia, is the manifestation of endothelial dysfunction promoted by high levels of factors released from the placenta (Escudero et al., 2009; Myatt and Roberts, 2015).

The brain vasogenic edema present in later stages of preeclampsia is apparently the result of impaired autoregulation of cerebral blood flow and increased BBB permeability (Cipolla and Kraig, 2011; Cipolla, 2013; Hammer and Cipolla, 2015), but the pathophysiological mechanisms involved are still unclear. In vitro studies have demonstrated that when rat cerebral vasculature was exposed to plasma from normal and preeclamptic human pregnancies, there was an increase in BBB permeability. Interestingly, this effect was more marked following treatment with preeclamptic plasma (Amburgey et al., 2010). Furthermore, this study demonstrated that inhibition of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity reversed the effect elicited by the treatment with preeclamptic plasma, suggesting that VEGF could be involved in modulating vascular permeability.

The pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα is also believed to contribute to the increased BBB permeability in preeclampsia. TNFα infusion in healthy pregnant rats at gestational day 19 increased the water content in the anterior cerebrum without increasing the BBB permeability (Warrington et al., 2015). However, when pregnant rats were subjected to a reduction of uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP), a model of placental ischemia that emulates preeclampsia and impairs the maternal cerebral blood flow, they exhibited an increase in both the water content at the anterior cerebrum and BBB permeability, which was counteracted by treatment with the TNFα inhibitor etanercept.

Findings from other studies conducted in the RUPP model have helped to elucidate how BECs respond to the circulating factors present in preeclampsia. When RUPP was performed in pregnant rats at gestational day 14, edema and increased maternal BBB permeability in the anterior cerebrum were observed, with increased expression of the protein aquaporin 4 and no changes in the expression of TJ proteins (Warrington et al., 2014). However, it has been reported the same procedure led to post-partum edema and increased maternal BBB permeability in the posterior cortex, probably due to reduced expression of the TJ protein occludin (Clayton et al., 2018).

The increased BBB permeability reported by both Warrington et al. (2014) and Clayton et al. (2018), is partly supported by clinical studies which demonstrated that in women developing preeclampsia, blood levels of S100B, neuronal specific enolase (NSE) and neurofilament light chain (NfL), three markers of cerebral injury, were higher than those observed in women with normal pregnancies (Bergman et al., 2018). Indeed, another report showed that in preeclamptic women, the levels of S100B and NSE were still high 1-year post-partum, suggesting that the alterations in the integrity of the BBB are manifest for a substantial period of time following delivery (Bergman et al., 2016).

Pharmacological Management of Preeclampsia

Hypertension is one of the pathological features of preeclampsia and is routinely managed with the use of antihypertensive drugs including nifedipine, nicardipine, labetalol, hydralazine and methyldopa (Odigboegwu et al., 2018). Although it remains unclear whether the BBB permeability of these drugs is affected during preeclampsia, it is noteworthy that several antihypertensives, namely labetalol, nicardipine and nifedipine, are substrates of efflux transporters including P-GP (Thiel-Demby et al., 2009; Choi et al., 2013; Incecayir et al., 2013). The therapeutic management of neurological complications associated with preeclampsia, including seizures, primarily relies on the intravenous or intramuscular administration of magnesium sulfate, a drug with demonstrated ability to prevent the development of eclampsia and reduce maternal mortality (Altman et al., 2002).

The mechanism of action by which magnesium sulfate exerts its effects is unknown, but despite this limitation, it is widely considered a neuroprotective agent capable of reducing BBB permeability in animal models of brain injury (Li et al., 2017). Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that magnesium sulfate reduced the water content in the anterior cerebrum, as well protein, cytokine, chemokine and VEGF levels in cerebrospinal fluid of rats subjected to the RUPP procedure (Zhang and Warrington, 2016). The above findings are important since the transport of drugs and endogenous mediators across the choroid plexus, which constitutes the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, is a subject that is receiving increasing interest. A better characterization of the mechanisms that govern transport of molecules across this barrier will certainly help to understand brain drug disposition in both healthy and disease states such as preeclampsia.

To date, as the specific effects of magnesium sulfate on the expression/functionality of BBB TJ proteins and drug transporters are unknown, future studies addressing this subject will prove crucial in identifying potential therapeutic targets and in developing treatment strategies.

How Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Dysfunction Could Alter Brain Drug Disposition in Preeclampsia

The effect of endothelial dysfunction elicited by preeclampsia on brain drug disposition is unknown. A preeclampsia-mediated increase in BBB permeability could potentially result in increased permeation of endogenous, blood-borne substances, including placental derived sFlt-1, and hormones, into the brain. Furthermore, a less restrictive BBB could allow more extensive penetration of therapeutic drugs into the CNS, resulting in increased side effects. In preeclamptic women, in addition to hypertension, which is treated with antihypertensive P-GP drug substrates, comorbidities, including epilepsy, depression and HIV infection, are often reported (Pariente et al., 2016). Since there is evidence that drugs belonging to these pharmacological groups are substrates and/or of ABC/SLC transporters (O’Brien et al., 2012; Stepien et al., 2012; Alam et al., 2016; Han et al., 2017), there is an obvious need to better understand the effect of preeclampsia on BBB transporter physiology and the effects of transporter modifications on brain drug disposition. A list of drugs used for treatment of chronic diseases in pregnancy and preeclampsia is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Drugs employed for treatment of chronic diseases in pregnancy and preeclampsia as substrates/inhibitors of ABC/SLC transporters expressed in human brain endothelial cells.

Drug ABC Transporter
SLC Transporter
Reference
Substrate Inhibitor Substrate Inhibitor
Antidepressants
Citalopram P-GP Weiss et al., 2003a; O’Brien et al., 2012
Fluoxetine P-GP Weiss et al., 2003a; O’Brien et al., 2013
Paroxetine P-GP P-GP Weiss et al., 2003a; O’Brien et al., 2012
Antiepileptics
Carbamazepine P-GP P-GP Weiss et al., 2003b; Zhang et al., 2012
Lamotrigine P-GP, BCRP P-GP Weiss et al., 2003b; Luna-Tortos et al., 2008; Romermann et al., 2015
Oxcarbazepine P-GP Weiss et al., 2003b; Zhang et al., 2011; Antunes Nde et al., 2016
Phenobarbital P-GP Luna-Tortos et al., 2008
Antihypertensives
Labetalol P-GP Incecayir et al., 2013
Nicardipine P-GP Kadono et al., 2010
Nifedipine P-GP Choi et al., 2013
Antirretroviral drugs
Abacavir P-GP, BCRP P-GP, BCRP Pan et al., 2007; Storch et al., 2007
Atazanavir P-GP P-GP, BCRP OATP2B1 Perloff et al., 2005; Storch et al., 2007; Weiss et al., 2007; Fujimoto et al., 2009
Darunavir P-GP P-GP OATP1A2 OATP2B1 Annaert et al., 2010; Hartkoorn et al., 2010; Kis et al., 2010
Efavirenz BCRP P-GP, BCRP OATP2B1 Storch et al., 2007; Weiss et al., 2007; Kis et al., 2010
Indinavir P-GP OATP1A2 Lee et al., 1998; Van Der Sandt et al., 2001; Campbell et al., 2015
Lopinavir P-GP P-GP, BCRP OATP1A2 Lee et al., 1998; Janneh et al., 2007; Weiss et al., 2007; Hartkoorn et al., 2010
Nelfinavir P-GP P-GP, BCRP OATP2B1 Kim et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 2004; Storch et al., 2007; Weiss et al., 2007; Kis et al., 2010
Nevirapine P-GP, BCRP Storch et al., 2007; Weiss et al., 2007
Raltregavir P-GP, BCRP Hashiguchi et al., 2013
Ritonavir P-GP P-GP, BCRP OATP1A2, OATP2B1 Van Der Sandt et al., 2001; Gupta et al., 2004; Weiss et al., 2007; Hartkoorn et al., 2010
Saquinavir P-GP P-GP, BCRP OATP1A2 OATP1A2, OATP2B1 Kim et al., 1998; Lee et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 2004; Janneh et al., 2005; Weiss et al., 2007; Hartkoorn et al., 2010; Kis et al., 2010
Zidovudine P-GP, BCRP, MRP4 BCRP Schuetz et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2003; Pan et al., 2007

Although the precise mechanisms, and effects, of alterations in BBB permeability associated with preeclampsia have not yet been elucidated, it is possible to gain an insight into the potential consequences of BBB modification from clinical situations in which the expression of BBB drug transporters and BBB integrity are altered. In this regard, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke are life-threatening conditions whose outcomes include severe BBB disruption (Knowland et al., 2014; Keep et al., 2018). In rodent models of ischemic stroke, based on middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), an increase in brain water content and a decrease in the expression of TJ proteins, including occludin and claudin-5, have been observed (Huang et al., 2017). In functional terms, the cited reports demonstrated an increase in BBB permeability, i.e., increased brain levels of drugs transported through the paracellular pathway. Interestingly, MCAO also resulted in a time dependent up-regulation of P-GP expression (Cen et al., 2013; DeMars et al., 2017), which may serve as a compensatory protective mechanism, especially for drugs that are substrates of this transporter.

Pathological similarities are observed in both ischemic stroke and preeclampsia, including neuroinflammation, vasogenic edema and increased BBB permeability (Figure 2). To date, there is a lack of studies addressing the effect of preeclampsia on BBB physiology and, in particular, the effects of this disorder on TJ complexes, which govern paracellular permeability, and on ABC/SLC transporters, which regulate transcellular permeability. However, there is potential to monitor ABC transporter functionality, particularly P-GP activity, in women who have a history of preeclamptic pregnancies using non-invasive PET studies employing 11C-verapamil as tracer (Shin et al., 2016). Future studies could employ this technique in women who had suffered preeclampsia or eclampsia, in order to measure P-GP activity and investigate whether there is a correlation between transporter activity and propensity of seizures.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effect of the endothelial dysfunction elicited by preeclampsia and stroke on the expression of transporters and TJ proteins. In both stroke and preeclampsia there is a decrease in the expression of TJ proteins, but in preeclampsia, this change appears to be evident post-partum. In stroke, endothelial dysfunction increases the expression of P-glycoprotein.

Concluding Remarks

The BBB is a highly restrictive but dynamic system that regulates the transport of ions and molecules into and out of the brain. Consequently, alterations in its function could result in an increased CNS exposure to potentially toxic xenobiotics, including therapeutic drugs, and endogenous factors. Given the findings that preeclampsia is associated with increased BBB permeability, there is an urgent and fundamental need to characterize the functionality of BBB ABC and SLC transporter proteins involved in CNS drug disposition through the use of appropriate pre-clinical models and execution of clinical studies.

A better understanding of preeclampsia-associated changes in BBB physiology would not only allow characterization of the processes responsible for pathophysiological changes, but could help improve the therapeutic management of women experiencing, or those who had experienced, preeclamptic pregnancies. Indeed, this knowledge will help to reduce the risk of acute and chronic complications caused by alterations in BBB function elicited by preeclampsia.

Author Contributions

PT-V designed and wrote the manuscript. CE and JP contributed to the writing of the manuscript and provided a critical revision of its contents.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Chilean National Commission of Science and Technological Research (CONICYT), which fund the project “Red multidisciplinaria para el análisis de los mecanismos fisiopatológicos subyacentes al daño endotelial cerebral presente en preeclampsia” Grant No. REDI170373.

References

  1. Abbott N. J. (2013). Blood-brain barrier structure and function and the challenges for CNS drug delivery. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 36 437–449. 10.1007/s10545-013-9608-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbott N. J., Patabendige A. A., Dolman D. E., Yusof S. R., Begley D. J. (2010). Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 37 13–25. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn C., Yang H., Lee D., An B. S., Jeung E. B. (2015). Placental claudin expression and its regulation by endogenous sex steroid hormones. Steroids 100 44–51. 10.1016/j.steroids.2015.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alam C., Whyte-Allman S. K., Omeragic A., Bendayan R. (2016). Role and modulation of drug transporters in HIV-1 therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 103 121–143. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Altman D., Carroli G., Duley L., Farrell B., Moodley J., Neilson J., et al. (2002). Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 359 1877–1890. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08778-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amburgey O. A., Chapman A. C., May V., Bernstein I. M., Cipolla M. J. (2010). Plasma from preeclamptic women increases blood-brain barrier permeability: role of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. Hypertension 56 1003–1008. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.158931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Annaert P., Ye Z. W., Stieger B., Augustijns P. (2010). Interaction of HIV protease inhibitors with OATP1B1, 1B3, and 2B1. Xenobiotica 40 163–176. 10.3109/00498250903509375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Antunes Nde J., Wichert-Ana L., Coelho E. B., Della Pasqua O., Alexandre Junior V., Takayanagui O. M., et al. (2016). Influence of verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of oxcarbazepine and of the enantiomers of its 10-hydroxy metabolite in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 72 195–201. 10.1007/s00228-015-1970-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013). Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 122 1122–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Argaw A. T., Asp L., Zhang J., Navrazhina K., Pham T., Mariani J. N., et al. (2012). Astrocyte-derived VEGF-A drives blood-brain barrier disruption in CNS inflammatory disease. J. Clin. Invest. 122 2454–2468. 10.1172/JCI60842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Avemary J., Salvamoser J. D., Peraud A., Remi J., Noachtar S., Fricker G., et al. (2013). Dynamic regulation of P-glycoprotein in human brain capillaries. Mol. Pharm. 10 3333–3341. 10.1021/mp4001102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Baello S., Iqbal M., Gibb W., Matthews S. G. (2016). Astrocyte-mediated regulation of multidrug resistance p-glycoprotein in fetal and neonatal brain endothelial cells: age-dependent effects. Physiol. Rep. 4:e12853. 10.14814/phy2.12853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bauer M., Karch R., Zeitlinger M., Philippe C., Romermann K., Stanek J., et al. (2015). Approaching complete inhibition of P-glycoprotein at the human blood-brain barrier: an (R)-[11C]verapamil PET study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 35 743–746. 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bergman L., Akerud H., Wikstrom A. K., Larsson M., Naessen T., Akhter T. (2016). Cerebral biomarkers in women with preeclampsia are still elevated 1 year postpartum. Am. J. Hypertens. 29 1374–1379. 10.1093/ajh/hpw097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bergman L., Zetterberg H., Kaihola H., Hagberg H., Blennow K., Akerud H. (2018). Blood-based cerebral biomarkers in preeclampsia: plasma concentrations of NfL, tau, S100B and NSE during pregnancy in women who later develop preeclampsia - A nested case control study. PLoS One 13:e0196025. 10.1371/journal.pone.0196025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Beyene K. G., Beza S. W. (2018). Self-medication practice and associated factors among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Trop. Med. Health 46:10. 10.1186/s41182-018-0091-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bloise E., Ortiga-Carvalho T. M., Reis F. M., Lye S. J., Gibb W., Matthews S. G. (2016). ATP-binding cassette transporters in reproduction: a new frontier. Hum. Reprod. Update 22 164–181. 10.1093/humupd/dmv049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Borthen I. (2015). Obstetrical complications in women with epilepsy. Seizure 28 32–34. 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bronger H., Konig J., Kopplow K., Steiner H. H., Ahmadi R., Herold-Mende C., et al. (2005). ABCC drug efflux pumps and organic anion uptake transporters in human gliomas and the blood-tumor barrier. Cancer Res. 65 11419–11428. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell S. D., Gadel S., Friedel C., Crafford A., Regina K. J., Kharasch E. D. (2015). Influence of HIV antiretrovirals on methadone N-demethylation and transport. Biochem. Pharmacol. 95 115–125. 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cantrill C. A., Skinner R. A., Rothwell N. J., Penny J. I. (2012). An immortalised astrocyte cell line maintains the in vivo phenotype of a primary porcine in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Brain Res. 1479 17–30. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cascorbi I. (2011). P-glycoprotein: tissue distribution, substrates, and functional consequences of genetic variations. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 201 261–283. 10.1007/978-3-642-14541-4_6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cecchelli R., Dehouck B., Descamps L., Fenart L., Buee-Scherrer V. V., Duhem C., et al. (1999). In vitro model for evaluating drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 36 165–178. 10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00083-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cen J., Liu L., Li M. S., He L., Wang L. J., Liu Y. Q., et al. (2013). Alteration in P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier in the early period of MCAO in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 65 665–672. 10.1111/jphp.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chavan A. R., Griffith O. W., Wagner G. P. (2017). The inflammation paradox in the evolution of mammalian pregnancy: turning a foe into a friend. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 47 24–32. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen J., Khalil R. A. (2017). Matrix metalloproteinases in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 148 87–165. 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Choi J. S., Choi I., Choi D. H. (2013). Effects of nifedipine on the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in rats: possible role of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibition by nifedipine. Pharmacol. Rep. 65 1422–1430. 10.1016/S1734-1140(13)71502-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Chung F. S., Eyal S., Muzi M., Link J. M., Mankoff D. A., Kaddoumi A., et al. (2010). Positron emission tomography imaging of tissue P-glycoprotein activity during pregnancy in the non-human primate. Br. J. Pharmacol. 159 394–404. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00538.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cipolla M. J. (2013). The adaptation of the cerebral circulation to pregnancy: mechanisms and consequences. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 33 465–478. 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cipolla M. J., Kraig R. P. (2011). Seizures in women with preeclampsia: mechanisms and management. Fetal Matern. Med. Rev. 22 91–108. 10.1017/S0965539511000040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Clayton A. M., Shao Q., Paauw N. D., Giambrone A. B., Granger J. P., Warrington J. P. (2018). Postpartum increases in cerebral edema and inflammation in response to placental ischemia during pregnancy. Brain Behav. Immun. 70 376–389. 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Coles L. D., Lee I. J., Hassan H. E., Eddington N. D. (2009). Distribution of saquinavir, methadone, and buprenorphine in maternal brain, placenta, and fetus during two different gestational stages of pregnancy in mice. J. Pharm. Sci. 98 2832–2846. 10.1002/jps.21644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cordon-Cardo C., O’brien J. P., Casals D., Rittman-Grauer L., Biedler J. L., Melamed M. R., et al. (1989). Multidrug-resistance gene (P-glycoprotein) is expressed by endothelial cells at blood-brain barrier sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86 695–698. 10.1073/pnas.86.2.695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Daneman R., Prat A. (2015). The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7:a020412. 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Danielsen I., Granstrom C., Rytter D., Halldorsson T. I., Bech B. H., Henriksen T. B., et al. (2014). Subclinical inflammation during third trimester of pregnancy was not associated with markers of the metabolic syndrome in young adult offspring. Obesity 22 1351–1358. 10.1002/oby.20650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dauchy S., Dutheil F., Weaver R. J., Chassoux F., Daumas-Duport C., Couraud P. O., et al. (2008). ABC transporters, cytochromes P450 and their main transcription factors: expression at the human blood-brain barrier. J. Neurochem. 107 1518–1528. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05720.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dauchy S., Miller F., Couraud P. O., Weaver R. J., Weksler B., Romero I. A., et al. (2009). Expression and transcriptional regulation of ABC transporters and cytochromes P450 in hCMEC/D3 human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 77 897–909. 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Decleves X., Jacob A., Yousif S., Shawahna R., Potin S., Scherrmann J. M. (2011). Interplay of drug metabolizing CYP450 enzymes and ABC transporters in the blood-brain barrier. Curr. Drug Metab. 12 732–741. 10.2174/138920011798357024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. DeMars K. M., Yang C., Hawkins K. E., Mccrea A. O., Siwarski D. M., Candelario-Jalil E. (2017). Spatiotemporal changes in P-glycoprotein levels in brain and peripheral tissues following ischemic stroke in rats. J. Exp. Neurosci. 11:1179069517701741. 10.1177/1179069517701741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dithmer S., Staat C., Muller C., Ku M. C., Pohlmann A., Niendorf T., et al. (2017). Claudin peptidomimetics modulate tissue barriers for enhanced drug delivery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1397 169–184. 10.1111/nyas.13359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Duley L. (2009). The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin. Perinatol. 33 130–137. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Eisenblatter T., Galla H. J. (2002). A new multidrug resistance protein at the blood-brain barrier. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293 1273–1278. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00376-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Eisenblatter T., Huwel S., Galla H. J. (2003). Characterisation of the brain multidrug resistance protein (BMDP/ABCG2/BCRP) expressed at the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res. 971 221–231. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02401-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Escudero C., Puebla C., Westermeier F., Sobrevia L. (2009). Potential cell signalling mechanisms involved in differential placental angiogenesis in mild and severe pre-eclampsia. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 7 475–485. 10.2174/157016109789043865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Evans P. W., Wheeler T., Anthony F. W., Osmond C. (1998). A longitudinal study of maternal serum vascular endothelial growth factor in early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 13 1057–1062. 10.1093/humrep/13.4.1057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Forbes K., Westwood M. (2010). Maternal growth factor regulation of human placental development and fetal growth. J. Endocrinol. 207 1–16. 10.1677/JOE-10-0174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fujimoto H., Higuchi M., Watanabe H., Koh Y., Ghosh A. K., Mitsuya H., et al. (2009). P-glycoprotein mediates efflux transport of darunavir in human intestinal Caco-2 and ABCB1 gene-transfected renal LLC-PK1 cell lines. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 32 1588–1593. 10.1248/bpb.32.1588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fujita K., Ichida K. (2018). ABCG2 as a therapeutic target candidate for gout. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 22 123–129. 10.1080/14728222.2018.1420167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grube M., Hagen P., Jedlitschky G. (2018). Neurosteroid transport in the brain: role of ABC and SLC transporters. Front. Pharmacol. 9:354. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gupta A., Zhang Y., Unadkat J. D., Mao Q. (2004). HIV protease inhibitors are inhibitors but not substrates of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 310 334–341. 10.1124/jpet.104.065342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hammer E. S., Cipolla M. J. (2015). Cerebrovascular dysfunction in preeclamptic pregnancies. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 17:64. 10.1007/s11906-015-0575-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Han H., Mann A., Ekstein D., Eyal S. (2017). Breaking bad: the structure and function of the blood-brain barrier in epilepsy. AAPS J. 19 973–988. 10.1208/s12248-017-0096-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Harati R., Benech H., Villegier A. S., Mabondzo A. (2013). P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, Organic Anion Transporter 3, and Transporting Peptide 1a4 during blood-brain barrier maturation: involvement of Wnt/beta-catenin and endothelin-1 signaling. Mol. Pharm. 10 1566–1580. 10.1021/mp300334r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hartkoorn R. C., Kwan W. S., Shallcross V., Chaikan A., Liptrott N., Egan D., et al. (2010). HIV protease inhibitors are substrates for OATP1A2, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 and lopinavir plasma concentrations are influenced by SLCO1B1 polymorphisms. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 20 112–120. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328335b02d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Haseloff R. F., Dithmer S., Winkler L., Wolburg H., Blasig I. E. (2015). Transmembrane proteins of the tight junctions at the blood-brain barrier: structural and functional aspects. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 38 16–25. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hashiguchi Y., Hamada A., Shinohara T., Tsuchiya K., Jono H., Saito H. (2013). Role of P-glycoprotein in the efflux of raltegravir from human intestinal cells and CD4+ T-cells as an interaction target for anti-HIV agents. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 439 221–227. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hebert M. F., Easterling T. R., Kirby B., Carr D. B., Buchanan M. L., Rutherford T., et al. (2008). Effects of pregnancy on CYP3A and P-glycoprotein activities as measured by disposition of midazolam and digoxin: a University of Washington specialized center of research study. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84 248–253. 10.1038/clpt.2008.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Helms H. C., Abbott N. J., Burek M., Cecchelli R., Couraud P. O., Deli M. A., et al. (2016). In vitro models of the blood-brain barrier: an overview of commonly used brain endothelial cell culture models and guidelines for their use. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36 862–890. 10.1177/0271678X16630991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hillgren K. M., Keppler D., Zur A. A., Giacomini K. M., Stieger B., Cass C. E., et al. (2013). Emerging transporters of clinical importance: an update from the International Transporter Consortium. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 94 52–63. 10.1038/clpt.2013.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hosoya K., Tachikawa M. (2011). Roles of organic anion/cation transporters at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers involving uremic toxins. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 15 478–485. 10.1007/s10157-011-0460-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Huai-Yun H., Secrest D. T., Mark K. S., Carney D., Brandquist C., Elmquist W. F., et al. (1998). Expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in brain microvessel endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 243 816–820. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.8132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Huang L., Shang E., Fan W., Li X., Li B., He S., et al. (2017). S-oxiracetam protect against ischemic stroke via alleviating blood brain barrier dysfunction in rats. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 109 40–47. 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Incecayir T., Tsume Y., Amidon G. L. (2013). Comparison of the permeability of metoprolol and labetalol in rat, mouse, and Caco-2 cells: use as a reference standard for BCS classification. Mol. Pharm. 10 958–966. 10.1021/mp300410n [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. International Transporter Consortium Giacomini. Giacomini K. M., Huang S. M., Tweedie D. J., Benet L. Z., Brouwer K. L., et al. (2010). Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9 215–236. 10.1038/nrd3028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Iqbal M., Baello S., Javam M., Audette M. C., Gibb W., Matthews S. G. (2016). Regulation of multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein in the developing blood-brain barrier: interplay between glucocorticoids and cytokines. J. Neuroendocrinol. 28:12360. 10.1111/jne.12360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Iqbal M., Gibb W., Matthews S. G. (2011). Corticosteroid regulation of P-glycoprotein in the developing blood-brain barrier. Endocrinology 152 1067–1079. 10.1210/en.2010-1227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Iqbal M., Ho H. L., Petropoulos S., Moisiadis V. G., Gibb W., Matthews S. G. (2012). Pro-inflammatory cytokine regulation of P-glycoprotein in the developing blood-brain barrier. PLoS One 7:e43022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Janneh O., Jones E., Chandler B., Owen A., Khoo S. H. (2007). Inhibition of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated proteins modulates the intracellular concentration of lopinavir in cultured CD4 T cells and primary human lymphocytes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60 987–993. 10.1093/jac/dkm353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Janneh O., Owen A., Chandler B., Hartkoorn R. C., Hart C. A., Bray P. G., et al. (2005). Modulation of the intracellular accumulation of saquinavir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by inhibitors of MRP1, MRP2, P-gp and BCRP. AIDS 19 2097–2102. 10.1097/01.aids.0000194793.36175.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jentink J., Loane M. A., Dolk H., Barisic I., Garne E., Morris J. K., et al. (2010). Valproic acid monotherapy in pregnancy and major congenital malformations. N. Engl. J. Med. 362 2185–2193. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Johnson A. C., Hammer E. S., Sakkaki S., Tremble S. M., Holmes G. L., Cipolla M. J. (2018). Inhibition of blood-brain barrier efflux transporters promotes seizure in pregnant rats: role of circulating factors. Brain Behav. Immun. 67 13–23. 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.07.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kadono K., Akabane T., Tabata K., Gato K., Terashita S., Teramura T. (2010). Quantitative prediction of intestinal metabolism in humans from a simplified intestinal availability model and empirical scaling factor. Drug Metab. Dispos. 38 1230–1237. 10.1124/dmd.109.029322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kalliokoski A., Niemi M. (2009). Impact of OATP transporters on pharmacokinetics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 158 693–705. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00430.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Keaney J., Campbell M. (2015). The dynamic blood-brain barrier. FEBS J. 282 4067–4079. 10.1111/febs.13412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Keep R. F., Andjelkovic A. V., Xiang J., Stamatovic S. M., Antonetti D. A., Hua Y., et al. (2018). Brain endothelial cell junctions after cerebral hemorrhage: changes, mechanisms and therapeutic targets. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 38 1255–1275. 10.1177/0271678X18774666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kim R. B., Fromm M. F., Wandel C., Leake B., Wood A. J., Roden D. M., et al. (1998). The drug transporter P-glycoprotein limits oral absorption and brain entry of HIV-1 protease inhibitors. J. Clin. Invest. 101 289–294. 10.1172/JCI1269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kis O., Zastre J. A., Ramaswamy M., Bendayan R. (2010). pH dependence of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 2B1 in Caco-2 cells: potential role in antiretroviral drug oral bioavailability and drug–drug interactions. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 334 1009–1022. 10.1124/jpet.110.166314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Knowland D., Arac A., Sekiguchi K. J., Hsu M., Lutz S. E., Perrino J., et al. (2014). Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron 82 603–617. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Koren G., Pariente G. (2018). Pregnancy- associated changes in pharmacokinetics and their clinical implications. Pharm. Res. 35:61. 10.1007/s11095-018-2352-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kreitchmann R., Harris D. R., Kakehasi F., Haberer J. E., Cahn P., Losso M., et al. (2012). Antiretroviral adherence during pregnancy and postpartum in Latin America. AIDS Patient Care STDS 26 486–495. 10.1089/apc.2012.0013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lafuente J. V., Argandona E. G., Mitre B. (2006). VEGFR-2 expression in brain injury: its distribution related to brain-blood barrier markers. J. Neural Transm. 113 487–496. 10.1007/s00702-005-0407-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ledwitch K. V., Barnes R. W., Roberts A. G. (2016). Unravelling the complex drug-drug interactions of the cardiovascular drugs, verapamil and digoxin, with P-glycoprotein. Biosci. Rep. 36:e00309. 10.1042/BSR20150317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lee C. G., Gottesman M. M., Cardarelli C. O., Ramachandra M., Jeang K. T., Ambudkar S. V., et al. (1998). HIV-1 protease inhibitors are substrates for the MDR1 multidrug transporter. Biochemistry 37 3594–3601. 10.1021/bi972709x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Lee N. Y., Kang Y. S. (2016). In vivo and in vitro evidence for brain uptake of 4-phenylbutyrate by the monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1). Pharm. Res. 33 1711–1722. 10.1007/s11095-016-1912-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lee W., Glaeser H., Smith L. H., Roberts R. L., Moeckel G. W., Gervasini G., et al. (2005). Polymorphisms in human organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1A2 (OATP1A2): implications for altered drug disposition and central nervous system drug entry. J. Biol. Chem. 280 9610–9617. 10.1074/jbc.M411092200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Li X., Han X., Yang J., Bao J., Di X., Zhang G., et al. (2017). Magnesium sulfate provides neuroprotection in eclampsia-like seizure model by ameliorating neuroinflammation and brain edema. Mol. Neurobiol. 54 7938–7948. 10.1007/s12035-016-0278-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Liao M. Z., Gao C., Shireman L. M., Phillips B., Risler L. J., Neradugomma N. K., et al. (2017). P-gp/ABCB1 exerts differential impacts on brain and fetal exposure to norbuprenorphine. Pharmacol. Res. 119 61–71. 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Liu X., Ma Q., Zhao Y., Mu W., Sun X., Cheng Y., et al. (2017). Impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms on plasma concentrations of efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir in Chinese children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Pharmacotherapy 37 1073–1080. 10.1002/phar.1988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Luna-Tortos C., Fedrowitz M., Loscher W. (2008). Several major antiepileptic drugs are substrates for human P-glycoprotein. Neuropharmacology 55 1364–1375. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Marzioni D., Banita M., Felici A., Paradinas F. J., Newlands E., De Nictolis M., et al. (2001). Expression of ZO-1 and occludin in normal human placenta and in hydatidiform moles. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 7 279–285. 10.1093/molehr/7.3.279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mealey K. L., Fidel J. (2015). P-glycoprotein mediated drug interactions in animals and humans with cancer. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 29 1–6. 10.1111/jvim.12525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mitchell A. A., Gilboa S. M., Werler M. M., Kelley K. E., Louik C., Hernandez-Diaz S., et al. (2011). Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205 e51–e58. 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Myatt L., Roberts J. M. (2015). Preeclampsia: syndrome or disease? Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 17:83. 10.1007/s11906-015-0595-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Navaro M., Vezzosi L., Santagati G., Angelillo I. F., Collaborative Working G. (2018). Knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding medication use in pregnant women in Southern Italy. PLoS One 13:e0198618. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nelander M., Wikstrom A. K., Weis J., Bergman L., Larsson A., Sundstrom-Poromaa I., et al. (2018). Cerebral osmolytes and plasma osmolality in pregnancy and preeclampsia: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Am. J. Hypertens. 31 847–853. 10.1093/ajh/hpy019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ni Z., Bikadi Z., Rosenberg M. F., Mao Q. (2010). Structure and function of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). Curr. Drug Metab. 11 603–617. 10.2174/138920010792927325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Nies A. T., Jedlitschky G., Konig J., Herold-Mende C., Steiner H. H., Schmitt H. P., et al. (2004). Expression and immunolocalization of the multidrug resistance proteins, MRP1-MRP6 (ABCC1-ABCC6), in human brain. Neuroscience 129 349–360. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.07.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. O’Brien F. E., Clarke G., Dinan T. G., Cryan J. F., Griffin B. T. (2013). Human P-glycoprotein differentially affects antidepressant drug transport: relevance to blood-brain barrier permeability. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 16 2259–2272. 10.1017/S1461145713000692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. O’Brien F. E., Dinan T. G., Griffin B. T., Cryan J. F. (2012). Interactions between antidepressants and P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: clinical significance of in vitro and in vivo findings. Br. J. Pharmacol. 165 289–312. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01557.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Odigboegwu O., Pan L. J., Chatterjee P. (2018). Use of antihypertensive drugs during preeclampsia. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 5:50. 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Palm M., Axelsson O., Wernroth L., Larsson A., Basu S. (2013). Involvement of inflammation in normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 92 601–605. 10.1111/aogs.12093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Palmsten K., Setoguchi S., Margulis A. V., Patrick A. R., Hernandez-Diaz S. (2012). Elevated risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women with depression: depression or antidepressants? Am. J. Epidemiol. 175 988–997. 10.1093/aje/kwr394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Pan G., Giri N., Elmquist W. F. (2007). Abcg2/Bcrp1 mediates the polarized transport of antiretroviral nucleosides abacavir and zidovudine. Drug Metab. Dispos. 35 1165–1173. 10.1124/dmd.106.014274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Pariente G., Leibson T., Carls A., Adams-Webber T., Ito S., Koren G. (2016). Pregnancy-associated changes in pharmacokinetics: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 13:e1002160. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Perloff E. S., Duan S. X., Skolnik P. R., Greenblatt D. J., Von Moltke L. L. (2005). Atazanavir: effects on P-glycoprotein transport and CYP3A metabolism in vitro. Drug Metab. Dispos. 33 764–770. 10.1124/dmd.104.002931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Picchianti-Diamanti A., Rosado M. M., Scarsella M., Lagana B., D’amelio R. (2014). P-glycoprotein and drug resistance in systemic autoimmune diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15 4965–4976. 10.3390/ijms15034965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Poguntke M., Hazai E., Fromm M. F., Zolk O. (2010). Drug transport by breast cancer resistance protein. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 6 1363–1384. 10.1517/17425255.2010.519700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Qosa H., Miller D. S., Pasinelli P., Trotti D. (2015). Regulation of ABC efflux transporters at blood-brain barrier in health and neurological disorders. Brain Res. 1628 298–316. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Reinhold A. K., Rittner H. L. (2017). Barrier function in the peripheral and central nervous system-a review. Pflugers Arch. 469 123–134. 10.1007/s00424-016-1920-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Reisinger T. L., Newman M., Loring D. W., Pennell P. B., Meador K. J. (2013). Antiepileptic drug clearance and seizure frequency during pregnancy in women with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 29 13–18. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.06.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Roberts J. M., Taylor R. N., Musci T. J., Rodgers G. M., Hubel C. A., Mclaughlin M. K. (1989). Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 161 1200–1204. 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90665-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Romermann K., Helmer R., Loscher W. (2015). The antiepileptic drug lamotrigine is a substrate of mouse and human breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2). Neuropharmacology 93 7–14. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Roth M., Obaidat A., Hagenbuch B. (2012). OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. Br. J. Pharmacol. 165 1260–1287. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01724.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Schreurs M. P., Houston E. M., May V., Cipolla M. J. (2012). The adaptation of the blood-brain barrier to vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor during pregnancy. FASEB J. 26 355–362. 10.1096/fj.11-191916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Schuetz J. D., Connelly M. C., Sun D., Paibir S. G., Flynn P. M., Srinivas R.V., et al. (1999). MRP4: a previously unidentified factor in resistance to nucleoside-based antiviral drugs. Nat. Med. 5 1048–1051. 10.1038/12487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Seetharaman S., Barrand M. A., Maskell L., Scheper R. J. (1998). Multidrug resistance-related transport proteins in isolated human brain microvessels and in cells cultured from these isolates. J. Neurochem. 70 1151–1159. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70031151.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Shawahna R., Uchida Y., Decleves X., Ohtsuki S., Yousif S., Dauchy S., et al. (2011). Transcriptomic and quantitative proteomic analysis of transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes in freshly isolated human brain microvessels. Mol. Pharm. 8 1332–1341. 10.1021/mp200129p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shin J. W., Chu K., Shin S. A., Jung K. H., Lee S. T., Lee Y. S., et al. (2016). Clinical applications of simultaneous PET/MR imaging using (R)-[11C]-verapamil with cyclosporin a: preliminary results on a surrogate marker of drug-resistant epilepsy. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 37 600–606. 10.3174/ajnr.A4566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sol Y., Choi S. H., Kim H. J., Kim Y. W., Cho B. M., Han H. S., et al. (2017). Morphologic mechanisms of increased vascular permeability of triolein emulsion to the blood-brain barrier. Microscopy 66 366–370. 10.1093/jmicro/dfx026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Stepien K. M., Tomaszewski M., Tomaszewska J., Czuczwar S. J. (2012). The multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein in pharmacoresistance to antiepileptic drugs. Pharmacol. Rep. 64 1011–1019. 10.1016/S1734-1140(12)70900-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Storch C. H., Theile D., Lindenmaier H., Haefeli W. E., Weiss J. (2007). Comparison of the inhibitory activity of anti-HIV drugs on P-glycoprotein. Biochem. Pharmacol. 73 1573–1581. 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sugawara I., Hamada H., Tsuruo T., Mori S. (1990). Specialized localization of P-glycoprotein recognized by MRK 16 monoclonal antibody in endothelial cells of the brain and the spinal cord. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 81 727–730. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02636.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Thiel-Demby V. E., Humphreys J. E., St John Williams L. A., Ellens H. M., Shah N., Ayrton A. D., et al. (2009). Biopharmaceutics classification system: validation and learnings of an in vitro permeability assay. Mol. Pharm. 6 11–18. 10.1021/mp800122b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tomson T., Battino D., Bonizzoni E., Craig J., Lindhout D., Perucca E., et al. (2018). Comparative risk of major congenital malformations with eight different antiepileptic drugs: a prospective cohort study of the EURAP registry. Lancet Neurol. 17 530–538. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30107-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Uchida Y., Ohtsuki S., Katsukura Y., Ikeda C., Suzuki T., Kamiie J., et al. (2011). Quantitative targeted absolute proteomics of human blood-brain barrier transporters and receptors. J. Neurochem. 117 333–345. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07208.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Van Der Sandt I. C., Vos C. M., Nabulsi L., Blom-Roosemalen M. C., Voorwinden H. H., de Boer A. G., et al. (2001). Assessment of active transport of HIV protease inhibitors in various cell lines and the in vitro blood–brain barrier. AIDS 15 483–491. 10.1097/00002030-200103090-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. van Vliet E. A., Zibell G., Pekcec A., Schlichtiger J., Edelbroek P. M., Holtman L., et al. (2010). COX-2 inhibition controls P-glycoprotein expression and promotes brain delivery of phenytoin in chronic epileptic rats. Neuropharmacology 58 404–412. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Viroga S., López M., Tamosiunas G. (2013). Seguridad de los medicamentos gastrointestinales en el embarazo. Arch. Med. Interna 35 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang X., Furukawa T., Nitanda T., Okamoto M., Sugimoto Y., Akiyama S., et al. (2003). Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) induces cellular resistance to HIV-1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Mol. Pharmacol. 63 65–72. 10.1124/mol.63.1.65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Warren M. S., Zerangue N., Woodford K., Roberts L. M., Tate E. H., Feng B., et al. (2009). Comparative gene expression profiles of ABC transporters in brain microvessel endothelial cells and brain in five species including human. Pharmacol. Res. 59 404–413. 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Warrington J. P., Drummond H. A., Granger J. P., Ryan M. J. (2015). Placental ischemia-induced increases in brain water content and cerebrovascular permeability: role of TNF-alpha. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 309 R1425–R1431. 10.1152/ajpregu.00372.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Warrington J. P., Fan F., Murphy S. R., Roman R. J., Drummond H. A., Granger J. P., et al. (2014). Placental ischemia in pregnant rats impairs cerebral blood flow autoregulation and increases blood-brain barrier permeability. Physiol. Rep. 2:e12134. 10.14814/phy2.12134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Weiss J., Dormann S. M., Martin-Facklam M., Kerpen C. J., Ketabi-Kiyanvash N., Haefeli W. E. (2003a). Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305 197–204. 10.1124/jpet.102.046532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Weiss J., Kerpen C. J., Lindenmaier H., Dormann S. M., Haefeli W. E. (2003b). Interaction of antiepileptic drugs with human P-glycoprotein in vitro. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 307 262–267. 10.1124/jpet.103.054197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Weiss J., Rose J., Storch C. H., Ketabi-Kiyanvash N., Sauer A., Haefeli W. E., Efferth T. (2007). Modulation of human BCRP (ABCG2) activity by anti-HIV drugs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59 238–245. 10.1093/jac/dkl474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Westin A. A., Brekke M., Molden E., Skogvoll E., Spigset O. (2017). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in pregnancy: changes in drug disposition. PLoS One 12:e0181082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Woodward O. M., Kottgen A., Coresh J., Boerwinkle E., Guggino W. B., Kottgen M. (2009). Identification of a urate transporter, ABCG2, with a common functional polymorphism causing gout. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 10338–10342. 10.1073/pnas.0901249106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zeeman G. G. (2009). Neurologic complications of pre-eclampsia. Semin. Perinatol. 33 166–172. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhang C., Kwan P., Zuo Z., Baum L. (2012). The transport of antiepileptic drugs by P-glycoprotein. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64 930–942. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Zhang C., Zuo Z., Kwan P., Baum L. (2011). In vitro transport profile of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, and their active metabolites by human P-glycoprotein. Epilepsia 52 1894–1904. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03140.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Zhang L. W., Warrington J. P. (2016). Magnesium sulfate prevents placental ischemia-induced increases in brain water content and cerebrospinal fluid cytokines in pregnant rats. Front. Neurosci. 10:561. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Zhang Y. K., Wang Y. J., Gupta P., Chen Z. S. (2015). Multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs) and cancer therapy. AAPS J. 17 802–812. 10.1208/s12248-015-9757-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Zhong X., Liu M. Y., Sun X. H., Wei M. J. (2016). Association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and haplotypes and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 6:32708. 10.1038/srep32708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Zhou S. F., Wang L. L., Di Y. M., Xue C. C., Duan W., Li C. G., et al. (2008). Substrates and inhibitors of human multidrug resistance associated proteins and the implications in drug development. Curr. Med. Chem. 15 1981–2039. 10.2174/092986708785132870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Zibell G., Unkruer B., Pekcec A., Hartz A. M., Bauer B., Miller D. S., et al. (2009). Prevention of seizure-induced up-regulation of endothelial P-glycoprotein by COX-2 inhibition. Neuropharmacology 56 849–855. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES