In the course of analyzing our simulation datasets with a new methodology, we came across errors in the calculation of the dissociation rate constants reported in our work.1 In the original paper these were k−1 = 15 μs−1 and k−1 = 13.6 μs−1 from the reactive flux and the relaxation methods, respectively. After correcting the error, which primarily involved a unit conversion problem, and reanalyzing the discretized simulation trajectories we recover values of k−1 = 179 μs−1 and 144 μs−1. The binding rates remain consistent with our previous analysis (k+1 = 647 μM−1s−1 and k+1 = 325 μM−1s−1, from the reactive flux and the relaxation methods, respectively). As a result of this correction in the misreported values, the resulting equilibrium constant is K = k+1/k−1= 3.6 M−1 from the reactive flux method and 2.3 M−1 from the relaxation method. These values of the equilibrium constant are actually in better accord with the experimental value (K =2.2 M−1).2 This correction leaves the rest of the results of the paper unchanged.
We would like to acknowledge Manuel Dibak and Dr. Mauricio del Razo (Freie Universitat¨ Berlin) for their help spotting this problem.
References
- (1).De Sancho D; Kubas A; Wang P-H; Blumberger J; Best RB J. Chem. Theory Comput 2015, 11, 1919–1927, PMID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Carver TE; Rohlfs RJ; Olson JS; Gibson QH; Blackmore RS; Springer BA; Sligar SG J. Biol. Chem 1990, 265, 20007–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
